Comments on: Althouse’s Clinton obsession.

By: Tom

Tom — Mon, 25 Jun 2007 00:59:58 +0000

#169. 20 years ago Ann Althouse was a dynamo – entertaining, thought provoking and insightful all at once.

If she is indeed just marking time now, that is truly unfortunate.

By: Jane E. Schneider

Jane E. Schneider — Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:07:13 +0000

Completely OT: Tundra, if you’re out there, I’m a little more awake now.

By: No Pardon for Treason.

No Pardon for Treason. — Thu, 21 Jun 2007 21:59:18 +0000

#167: 20 years ago? How about a recent one: I was a law student at UW just two years ago. Althouse is a professor to be avoided. As I stated earlier, her method of “teaching” is to read questions out of the text.

Her skills are best used watching American Idol.

She’s yet another hypocritical Conservative who lives off the backs of the taxpayers (UW is a public university).

By: barrelhse

barrelhse — Thu, 21 Jun 2007 03:40:43 +0000

Regent, Tom?

By: Tom

Tom — Thu, 21 Jun 2007 01:53:05 +0000

I am, or to be correct, was, one of Ann Althouse’s students 20 odd years ago.

Ann Althouse a conservative?

An iconoclast, yes; conservative, no.

And lest any seek to right me off as a light weight, I claim the accepted elitist badges of status: Law Review and top 10%.

You guys are outta your league.

By: Wayne A. Schneider

Wayne A. Schneider — Wed, 20 Jun 2007 23:00:13 +0000

Stop by Wayneâ€™s blog, heâ€™s got another song parody for your enjoyment.

Comment by Jane E. Schneider

Thanks,but no thanks. Iâ€™d rather watch paint dry.

Comment by dbadass â€” June 20, 2007 @ 3:02 am

She wasnâ€™t inviting you, troll.

Comment by SKdeA â€” June 20, 2007 @ 3:06 am

Actually, I welcome anyone to come read my blog and leave comments, provided you want to be serious. Not only is it there for your mild amusement, but I like to hone my debating skills by trying to refute the other side’s arguments on the serious stuff. If someone seriously believes I’m mistaken about something, by all means, say so and why. If I find that I’m wrong, then I’ll have to reconsider my views. Which shows I’m a liberal.

And you are always welcome to come visit, SKdeA. Now that I’m back to regular blogging, the muse has been hitting me again.

By: lizriz

lizriz — Wed, 20 Jun 2007 21:21:41 +0000

ROTFLMAO

By: Denis Diderot

Denis Diderot — Wed, 20 Jun 2007 21:08:21 +0000

This from a law professor who wrote a law review article entitled “Standing in Fuzzy Slippers.” (Full Disclosure: I graduated from University of Wisconsin law school, and Prof. Althouse was near uniformly considered something of an intellectual light-weight.) On the other hand, I have enjoyed Althouse’s blogging about American Idol, a topic that fits her intellectual skills.

By: angryvietnamvet

angryvietnamvet — Wed, 20 Jun 2007 17:06:59 +0000

my previous post was just to demonstrate that i canbe as crazy as any old law professor in the hinterlands…

By: angryvietnamvet

angryvietnamvet — Wed, 20 Jun 2007 17:05:11 +0000

Funny, onion rings always remind me of j.c. on the cross…I know, its all very sexual, but I must confess…maybe jerry fellatiowell can cure me from his perch in onionville, worstcuntsis

By: dbadass

dbadass — Wed, 20 Jun 2007 16:33:48 +0000

But you have to admit, you were being kind of rude to Janeâ€¦

Comment by SKdeA â€” June 20, 2007 @ 3:22 am

My apologies to Jane. No intent intended

By: dbadass

dbadass — Wed, 20 Jun 2007 16:32:17 +0000

Thanks,but no thanks. Iâ€™d rather watch paint dry.

Comment by dbadass â€” June 20, 2007 @ 3:02 am

She wasnâ€™t inviting you, troll.

Comment by SKdeA â€” June 20, 2007 @ 3:06 am

No problem as the invite must have been for the weaker version of “dbadass”.

By: dbadass

dbadass — Wed, 20 Jun 2007 16:30:07 +0000

Stop by Wayneâ€™s blog, heâ€™s got another song parody for your enjoyment.

Comment by Jane E. Schneider

Thanks,but no thanks. Iâ€™d rather watch paint dry.

Comment by dbadass â€” June 20, 2007 @ 3:02 am

Damn! I thought I was the only dbadass. Apparently there is one awake at 3:02 am. I’ll bet I’m a bigger badass than you. Wanna find out?

By: Sharon

Sharon — Wed, 20 Jun 2007 14:49:49 +0000

No Candyce, your probably a closet vegan…Blessings

By: Candyce

Candyce — Wed, 20 Jun 2007 13:34:25 +0000

I must be totally naive or totally repressed. I have never associated onion rings with vagina. In fact, onion rings are my favorite side when I give in to the urge to feed my need for something bad to eat. Does this mean I am a lesbian?

By: john

john — Wed, 20 Jun 2007 13:27:59 +0000

diodorus siculus
made himself ridiculus
he thought a thimble
was a phallic symbol

(i think x.j. kennedy wrote that)

By: No Pardon for Treason.

No Pardon for Treason. — Wed, 20 Jun 2007 13:22:21 +0000

I have friends who attended UW Law School and took classes with Prof. Althouse. She is a hack of a professor who “taught” Constitutional law by reading problem sets out of the textbook. No other dialogue between her and the students. A weak legal mind who is living off the teat of the Wisconsin taxpayers.

By: heyzeus

heyzeus — Wed, 20 Jun 2007 13:02:53 +0000

(Curd Blossoms?)

By: heyzeus

heyzeus — Wed, 20 Jun 2007 13:01:47 +0000

As she is now a resident of Wisconsin, I’m wondering if Ann has any views on the sexual connotations of deep fried cheese curds.

By: SquarePeg

SquarePeg — Wed, 20 Jun 2007 12:59:34 +0000

Symbolism, who wouldn’t thought it:

Jerry Falwell: Teletubbie with thing on head = gay.

Althouse: Onion ring = vagina.

Now, all we need is an interpretation of the symbolism for George Bush!