Mark Levin’s Grand Left-Wing Conspiracy Theory Falls Apart In First Sentence
Mark Levin’s Grand Left-Wing Conspiracy Theory Falls Apart In First Sentence
Yesterday, the Center for American Progress and Free Press jointly released a statistical analysis showing that talk radio in the United States is dominated almost exclusively by conservatives.
Matt Drudge picked up the report, and it’s now being pilloried on the right. First out of the gate was National Review writer and radio host Mark Levin, who conjured a conspiracy theory linking the report on radio regulation to Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY):
The Center for American Progress and Free Press (yeh, right) is a sleazy operation. It was set-up by Bill Clinton’s impeachment chief of staff, John Podesta, and is run by him today. It is no coincidence that Podesta would issue this report now, as its purpose is to help Hillary Clinton by unleashing yet another assault on talk radio. [...]
The Center for American Progress and Free Press is an IRS designated tax-exempt 501 (C)(3) organization, based on its representation to the IRS that it is a non-partisan group operating in the public interest. My guess is that Podesta is in regular communication with the Clinton campaign and he or others may well be coordinating some of their activities on her behalf and on behalf of the Democrat Party.
Levin’s attack falls apart in his first sentence. The “sleazy” Clintonista “Center for American Progress and Free Press” doesn’t exist. There is no such organization.
The Center for American Progress, headed by former Clinton chief of staff John Podesta, is one group. Free Press is its own, distinct group. The report was a collaboration between these two progressive nonprofit organizations. Perhaps Levin can make clear whether he thinks Free Press is part of the Clinton conspiracy, or was duped into collaborating on the report.
Additionally, CAP does not coordinate with any campaign, and Levin offers no evidence — other than his “guess” — that the report’s “purpose” was to “help Hillary Clinton.” The real purpose of the report was to highlight the imbalance in talk radio and propose remedies.
ThinkProgress also spoke with Josh Silver, executive director of Free Press, who issued this response to Levin:
As executive director of Free Press, I was surprised to learn on the National Review Web site that my organization was part of the Center for American Progress. While we did work with CAP on this study of talk radio programming, as well as issues like Community Internet, a simple Google search would have showed that Free Press is an independent, nonpartisan organization. We don’t take money from any political party or corporation, and we have teamed up on different media policy issues with everyone from MoveOn.org and the Christian Coalition to the ACLU, the Parents Television Council and the American Library Association.
Last I checked, we were even working with The National Review itself on a campaign to stop unfair postal rate hikes that threaten smaller publications and opinion journals. If we can get those rate hikes reversed, hopefully NRO.com will be able to hire more fact-checkers.
Topic Cloud
ArchivesBlog Roll
Too late. Levin’s lies will find their way into the rightwing blogosphere, where they will be spread as fact.
June 21st, 2007 at 5:17 pmAlright, it seems like a grammatical error the douchebag made. I think Levin is a prick, but c’mon TP you seem to be reaching a bit.
June 21st, 2007 at 5:20 pmYes, we liberals regularly meet at John Podesta’s house (yes, all of us) to conspire on how to… how to… how to, uh… what exactly is their issue here? That liberals are “conspiring” with other liberals to study the media? Sheesh… So, this is what happens after you’ve completely scraped the bottom of the barrel…
If I were gonna accuse someone of conspiracy – I’d make it a hell of a lot more interesting and melodramatic than this non-issue of a ’study’.
June 21st, 2007 at 5:23 pmLet him talk. He sounds like a jackass and thinks like a schoolboy.
June 21st, 2007 at 5:24 pmThe first time I heard him, I thought it was a parody.
The drudge link would explain why the AM Radion thread had over 2000 comments. I wonder what it is about radio that seems to drive the righties so crazy?
June 21st, 2007 at 5:24 pmfortruth, he said:
The Center for American Progress and Free Press (yeh, right)
is a sleazy operation.
not are…
but, even many commentors here, myself included, think that TP
June 21st, 2007 at 5:26 pm(and CAP) have a “close” relationship with hillary…
and, duh…
…
Is TP once again trying to deny they favor Hillary Clinton? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
June 21st, 2007 at 5:28 pmi just got back here and found out the original thread
about this report has alomost 3000 comments…
dare i read any of them, or is it a trooll-fest over there…
yeesh!
June 21st, 2007 at 5:28 pmThe drudge link would explain why the AM Radion thread had over 2000 comments. I wonder what it is about radio that seems to drive the righties so crazy?
Comment by Krazny
Yep.
What? They’re not up to 5000 yet? :D
June 21st, 2007 at 5:29 pmIt’s one of their primary outlets for their Noise Machine, and it’s a HUGE outlet at that. The viewership for their shows are big, and they rely on all those “Great Americans” who listen to their vitriolic sputum to vote for their Noise Machine agenda. No wingnut outlet holds a candle to that, which is why Hannity has been going apesh$t on the topic lately. It’s a major threat to them – a well-balanced opinion just can’t happen in their world. It would shatter all those decades they have worked so diligently hard to control.
June 21st, 2007 at 5:29 pmRight Wing Dictionary
“Assault” – Asking for Fairness
June 21st, 2007 at 5:30 pm“sleazy” – Reporting exactly what Conservatives say.
File under: The Radiculous Right
June 21st, 2007 at 5:30 pmI guess nobody checks the FACTS before they open their mouths anymore.
I’ve heard Levin peeps in windows all over his home town…..
June 21st, 2007 at 5:30 pmMatt Drudge picked up the report, and it’s now being pilloried on the right.
“Pilloried” is an excellent term.
Number of comments on yesterday’s “talk radio” thread: 2947 and counting.
Number of comments on yesterday’s “talk radio” thread with substance: 223, and don’t expect that number to go up anytime soon (unless you mosey over there and do it yourself).
June 21st, 2007 at 5:31 pmwho sits at home all day and listens to the radio? i have a job to go to and a family to raise.
June 21st, 2007 at 5:32 pmdare i read any of them, or is it a trooll-fest over there…
yeesh!
Comment by katy
“It’s like thousands of chipmunks in a circle-jerk orgy” is how someone described it. LOL
June 21st, 2007 at 5:34 pmUnfortunately, one thing the wingnuts seem to have the Dems just don’t seem to have is a united, rabid, group who is devoted and loyal. Completely reliable and consistent, who will rally around and become an effective team.
I don’t see that with Dems.
June 21st, 2007 at 5:36 pmJune 21, 2007
Liberals On Talk Radio: If You Can’t Beat Em…….Legislate Them To Death
by B.T.
Things like this that appear on a blog that fraudulently uses the word “progress†in its name just makes me chuckle:
REPORT: The Right Wing Domination Of
Talk Radio And How To End It
The Center for American Progress and Free Press today released the first-of-its-kind statistical analysis of the political make-up of talk radio in the United States. It confirms that talk radio, one of the most widely used media formats in America, is dominated almost exclusively by conservatives.
The new report — entitled “The Structural Imbalance of Political Talk Radio†— raises serious questions about whether the companies licensed to broadcast over the public radio airwaves are serving the listening needs of all Americans.
While progressive talk is making inroads on commercial stations, right-wing talk reigns supreme on America’s airwaves. Some key findings:
– In the spring of 2007, of the 257 news/talk stations owned by the top five commercial station owners, 91 percent of the total weekday talk radio programming was conservative, and only 9 percent was progressive.
– Each weekday, 2,570 hours and 15 minutes of conservative talk are broadcast on these stations compared to 254 hours of progressive talk — 10 times as much conservative talk as progressive talk.
– 76 percent of the news/talk programming in the top 10 radio markets is conservative, while 24 percent is progressive.
Two common myths are frequently offered to explain the imbalance of talk radio: 1) the 1987 repeal of the Fairness Doctrine (which required broadcasters to devote airtime to contrasting views), and 2) simple consumer demand. Each of these fails to adequately explain the root cause of the problem. The report explains:
Our conclusion is that the gap between conservative and progressive talk radio is the result of multiple structural problems in the U.S. regulatory system, particularly the complete breakdown of the public trustee concept of broadcast, the elimination of clear public interest requirements for broadcasting, and the relaxation of ownership rules including the requirement of local participation in management. […]
Ultimately, these results suggest that increasing ownership diversity, both in terms of the race/ethnicity and gender of owners, as well as the number of independent local owners, will lead to more diverse programming, more choices for listeners, and more owners who are responsive to their local communities and serve the public interest.
Along with other ideas, the report recommends that national radio ownership not be allowed to exceed 5 percent of the total number of AM and FM broadcast stations, and local ownership should not exceed more than 10 percent of the total commercial radio stations in a given market.
This kind of report is comedy gold. Really, for people who are supposedly so smart God himself is envious to write this kind of tripe is hilarious, because they so badly miss the point entirely. Conservative talk radio is popular because the majority of the hosts are good at what they do, and are articulate in what they say. Liberal talk radio is so far to the left it’s only going to appeal to the same kind of people that run and read sites like Think Progress and democraticunderground, the same folks who so consistenly focused on the bad and negative in America, and who are so intolerant of more conservative views they turn off the political middle. At least in Conservative talk radio you get all shades of the right, which makes for a broader listening base.
If liberals, who already control much of the MSM and get carte blanche with their views daily, could put forth a talk show host that wasn’t a charter member of MoveOn who could appeal to a broad base of folks this wouldn’t be an issue. But they have yet to try that. No, instead their focus is on how they can just legislate Conservative talk radio away. Could it be they know deep down their pure unadulterated liberalism can’t beat Conservatism head to head?
June 21st, 2007 at 5:37 pmthe am radio thread is pretty much a right wing circle jerk at this point. I wouldn’t bother unless you like mindless aggression and hate
June 21st, 2007 at 5:37 pm“It’s like thousands of chipmunks in a circle-jerk orgy†is how someone described it. LOL
Comment by Wayne
“Someone” deserves credit. That’s hysterical and perfect.
June 21st, 2007 at 5:38 pmThe left-wing conspiracy he’s talking about is a horde of pissed off Americans getting involved to stop a bunch of crooks from robbing America of its future.
Stop Joe Lieberman from helping Susan Collins get re-elected. This is a chance for a big political win today!
June 21st, 2007 at 5:38 pmRadio trash jocks are mostly far-right jerks and not leftwingers.
June 21st, 2007 at 5:39 pmTP should take the same approach toward their friends as they do their enemies. It would have exposed this dubious story and the partisans behind it. Ridiculous.
June 21st, 2007 at 5:41 pmI just wish TP would finally come out and admit they are a Clinton operation. If you think I am wrong, TP should announce which canidate they support (it is obviously Clinton of course).
June 21st, 2007 at 5:42 pm“Someone†deserves credit. That’s hysterical and perfect.
Comment by gummitch
so true
heh found it.
It’s… it’s like watching an enormous swarm of… rabid chipmunks… performing some sort of ritualistic, endless, circle-jerk…
Comment by The Republic of Stupidity
June 21st, 2007 at 5:42 pmUnfortunately, one thing the wingnuts seem to have the Dems just don’t seem to have is a united, rabid, group who is devoted and loyal. Completely reliable and consistent, who will rally around and become an effective team.
I don’t see that with Dems.
Comment by ForTruth — June 21, 2007 @ 5:36 pm
No question. Conservatives have more group discipline than liberals — that’s because they see things in more simplified patterns. Liberals are more comfortable with nuance, and thus have a much more difficult time coming to agreement.
Also because it seems that with conservatives, it’s all about winning, not so much about what’s best.
June 21st, 2007 at 5:45 pmRoger I’m pretty sure most of us are aware this site is a Hillary Clinton site.
I like to come here for the fun. You like to come here for the free sodas.
June 21st, 2007 at 5:46 pmSo THAT’S why I’ve been censored in the past for criticizing Bill Clinton!
June 21st, 2007 at 5:48 pmSpit take
I agree,
If you keep it real simple, then everyone can agree. If everyone in the group is simple-minded, then the whole-group think can take over.
No wonder ants are some of the most prolific organisms on the planet.
June 21st, 2007 at 5:48 pmI work in a newsroom, and I’m the only conservative in my newsroom. Explain to me why all of my colleagues are flaming left-wingers. The same has been true in the other newsrooms I’ve worked in.
June 21st, 2007 at 5:49 pmComment by Roger_Roger
Faiz has already stated TP does not support any one candidate.
But we realize you have a reading comprehension problem……
June 21st, 2007 at 5:49 pmLevin is a major moron.
June 21st, 2007 at 5:50 pmSo THAT’S why I’ve been censored in the past for criticizing Bill Clinton!
Comment by Alejandro
Funny, they never censor my rants against Hillary.
June 21st, 2007 at 5:51 pmJust Saying….
Mark Levin is an unmitigated piece of filth. How anyone can tolerate more than 5 minutes of his screed is beyond me. My gag reflex to this POS is second only to Glenn Beck.
June 21st, 2007 at 5:51 pmHow bout this is a progressive site with a goal of letting facts come to light.Then we get to tear it apart or support it as we see fit.
F@CKING IDIOT.
Screw this, my back hurts.
June 21st, 2007 at 5:52 pmI’m going home.
HRUMPF
“I work in a newsroom, and I’m the only conservative in my newsroom. Explain to me why all of my colleagues are flaming left-wingers. The same has been true in the other newsrooms I’ve worked in.
Comment by John R. — June 21, 2007 @ 5:49 pm”
And yet they don’t chase after this president…….
They give him a pass on EVERYTHING!!!!!
I remember seeing Clinton on the TV EVERYDAY for the impeachment…..
So a Republican president BREAKING MORE LAWS THEN the Mafia get very little reporting, but a Democrat president gets news reports 24/7 for a blow job????
Yeah……. That’s a flamin left-leaning meadia…..
June 21st, 2007 at 5:53 pmN-O-T!!!
THis sucker is funded by the Center for American Progress. Hmmmm.
Its ok, we all have our funding sources. Its just reality. Just know what you are dealing with.
What’s Roger’s funding source?
June 21st, 2007 at 5:54 pmI work in a newsroom, and I’m the only conservative in my newsroom. Explain to me why all of my colleagues are flaming left-wingers. The same has been true in the other newsrooms I’ve worked in.
Comment by John R. — June 21, 2007 @ 5:49 pm
Sounds like a personal problem to me.
June 21st, 2007 at 5:58 pmI work in a newsroom, and I’m the only conservative in my newsroom. Explain to me why all of my colleagues are flaming left-wingers. The same has been true in the other newsrooms I’ve worked in.
Comment by John R
Given the language you used to describe your co-workers, I am led to believe that anyone to the left of Atilla would be a “flaming left-winger” in your book. Until you can get a job at the National Review, you’ll probably have to put up with it.
June 21st, 2007 at 5:59 pmI’ve figured out all our problems, but I don’t have a fix unfortunately. Right-wingers simply haven’t evolved as far as the left. They’re incapable of critical thought, and their response to everything is defensive and attacking.
To my mind, most of our problems will go away when we reach a critical mass of those who have evolved.
June 21st, 2007 at 6:00 pmI finally saw coverage of the Tax evader guy holed up in his compound.
If you read the entire story, only the last 3 sentences tell the guy’s side, and why he is doing it.
Fox won’t touch that story at all.
We wouldn’t want people asking questions about the 1913 act which may not have been properly ratified. Just sayin’
June 21st, 2007 at 6:00 pm“We wouldn’t want people asking questions about the 1913 act which may not have been properly ratified. Just sayin’
Comment by ForTruth — June 21, 2007 @ 6:00 pm”
Not just that……
The BIG problem is that ONLY the CONGRESS can make laws…..
The last time I checked the IRS was not CONGRESS…….
To date, NO ONE has been able to provide the law that Congress passed stating that people has to pay personal income tax.
By the Constitution the IRS is ILLEGAL!!!!
Though many will argue otherwise, I simply ask them to show me the law passed by Congress and they can’t!
June 21st, 2007 at 6:04 pmits still a liberal group who wants to hush free speech.
June 21st, 2007 at 6:11 pmThough many will argue otherwise, I simply ask them to show me the law passed by Congress and they can’t!
Comment by RemoveBush
Sixteenth Amendment to the Constitution.
What part of that do you not understand?
June 21st, 2007 at 6:15 pmThough many will argue otherwise, I simply ask them to show me the law passed by Congress and they can’t!
Comment by RemoveBush
The 16th amendment
“The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.”
Amendment XVI (the Sixteenth Amendment) of the United States Constitution, authorizing income taxes in their present form, was ratified on February 3, 1913.
According to the United States Government Printing Office, the following states ratified the amendment:[8]
1. Alabama (August 10, 1909)
June 21st, 2007 at 6:20 pm2. Kentucky (February 8, 1910)
3. South Carolina (February 19, 1910)
4. Illinois (March 1, 1910)
5. Mississippi (March 7, 1910)
6. Oklahoma (March 10, 1910)
7. Maryland (April 8, 1910)
8. Georgia (August 3, 1910)
9. Texas (August 16, 1910)
10. Ohio (January 19, 1911)
11. Idaho (January 20, 1911)
12. Oregon (January 23, 1911)
13. Washington (January 26, 1911)
14. Montana (January 27, 1911)
15. Indiana (January 30, 1911)
16. California (January 31, 1911)
17. Nevada (January 31, 1911)
18. South Dakota (February 1, 1911)
19. Nebraska (February 9, 1911)
20. North Carolina (February 11, 1911)
21. Colorado (February 15, 1911)
22. North Dakota (February 17, 1911)
23. Michigan (February 23, 1911)
24. Iowa (February 24, 1911)
25. Kansas (March 2, 1911)
26. Missouri (March 16, 1911)
27. Maine (March 31, 1911)
28. Tennessee (April 7, 1911)
29. Arkansas (April 22, 1911, after having previously rejected the amendment)
30. Wisconsin (May 16, 1911)
31. New York (July 12, 1911)
32. Arizona (April 3, 1912)
33. Minnesota (June 11, 1912)
34. Louisiana (June 28, 1912)
35. West Virginia (January 31, 1913)
36. New Mexico (February 3, 1913)
Thanks Wayne.
I pay my taxes.
June 21st, 2007 at 6:23 pm#39 Comment by Namtillaku — June 21, 2007 @ 6:00 pm
I’ve figured out all our problems, but I don’t have a fix unfortunately. Right-wingers simply haven’t evolved as far as the left. They’re incapable of critical thought, and their response to everything is defensive and attacking.
Al Gore, in his new book, “The Assault on Reason” says it differently, even though the result is as you note. In chapter 1 called “the politics of fear,” he points to fear as the governing factor. (Not a new thought but the real answer, nontheless.)
People that jump on board the BushCo, right wingnut bandwagon, are scared to death, and thought is nowhere to be found. Once they sign on to the emotional fear no one is going to talk them out of it. They are operating on emotional auto-pilot. It would be like trying to pry a gun out of a rigormortised hand. And that is one reason it is of no value to argue or “discuss” anything with trolls.
To my mind, most of our problems will go away when we reach a critical mass of those who have evolved.
Yes, our evolutionary direction is leading us there. However, as the scientists are now discovering we are a long distance from that cure. The real hope we have in the present, is to promote reason and logic to prevent evil people from using fear to manipulate and control us. BushCo is the best and most apparent use these things, and of the danger we face as a country and the world.
Check out Gore’s book! It is an extraordinary view of the big picture. Extremely readable; he puts into clear perspective what is, and has been, going on and his view of why. I have not heard this kind of clarity from any presidential candidate!
June 21st, 2007 at 6:54 pmJohn R said, “I work in a newsroom, and I’m the only conservative in my newsroom. Explain to me why all of my colleagues are flaming left-wingers.”
I think it’s because journalists tend to be educated people who care about the world around them. How’d you get in?
June 21st, 2007 at 7:19 pmLevin goes ballastic right from the gitgo. Maybe you should responded in kind by saying something like – “Mark Levin is a renowned child molester who writes for an organization where most of the staff get hot just thinking about Fred Thompson’s aftershave”. And if you just happened to call his organization the Weekly National Standard Review, you’d have his accuracy in naming organizations.
Seriously, they let this loon out of his cage again?
June 21st, 2007 at 7:27 pmIt’s not very surprising that the GOP has been trying everything they can to paint a bad picture of notable Democratic leaders. The support of Democratic candidates and leaders really supports the notion that the Democrats are taking on issues that really matter to the American people. From health care to education and poverty, these issues take precedence over an ever-inflating military budget. This is why the the GOP and conservatives have resorted to smear campaigns. They can’t win on the issues.
The Borgen Project states that just $19 billion annually can end starvation and $23 billon annually can reverse the spread of Malaria and AIDS. With these issues being so easily addressed, it is no wonder that a war-touting Republican side isn’t doing well in the polls or with the American people.
June 21st, 2007 at 7:32 pmThe drudge link would explain why the AM Radion thread had over 2000 comments. I wonder what it is about radio that seems to drive the righties so crazy?
Comment by Krazny — June 21, 2007 @ 5:24 pm
Will someone give me the link to this?
June 21st, 2007 at 7:40 pmWill someone give me the link to this?
Comment by Merlin
Just scroll down the main TP page until you get to yesterday’s article about the study on Right Wing Radio.
June 21st, 2007 at 8:37 pmThe Center for American Progress … is an IRS designated tax-exempt 501 (C)(3) organization, based on its representation to the IRS that it is a non-partisan group operating in the public interest.
So the left-wing conspiracy theory fell down.
June 21st, 2007 at 8:50 pmMeanwhile the tax fraud case looks pretty strong.
Comment by gummitch — June 21, 2007 @ 8:37 pm
Thanks. I wrote that thread off so early as a bad thread, I forgot it existed. Looking at it now prooves that it is.
June 21st, 2007 at 8:51 pm“its still a liberal group who wants to hush free speech.
Comment by Chris — June 21, 2007 @ 6:11 pm”
And the proof?
June 21st, 2007 at 8:54 pm“The Center for American Progress … is an IRS designated tax-exempt 501 (C)(3) organization, based on its representation to the IRS that it is a non-partisan group operating in the public interest.
So the left-wing conspiracy theory fell down.
Meanwhile the tax fraud case looks pretty strong.
Comment by Kilo — June 21, 2007 @ 8:50 pm”
Hmmmm, I believe the non-partisan part applies to where their funding comes from, not what opinions they hold. I think ya’ got nuthin’.
June 21st, 2007 at 8:58 pmI love it! Conservatives getting their asses handed to them by way of the truth. No media bias on tv, radio, or any other main stream medium. The blogoshpere is shaping up to be the great equalizer. Some thorough research, click and paste, done… Like the baby eating son of satan once said, “Bring it on!”
June 21st, 2007 at 10:58 pmthis is for unbelievable
Kucinich: Congress To Take On FCC, consider ‘Fairness Doctrine’, says ‘we are now in a position to move a progressive agenda’… ^
From the January 16, 2007 01:55:48 GMT edition of the Drudge Report.
http://www.fmqb.com/Article.asp?id=333927
June 22nd, 2007 at 2:08 amdantheman are you and Hugo Chavez related ? or maybe just party together
June 22nd, 2007 at 2:09 am“No media bias on tv, radio, or any other main stream medium.”
I believe that piece put out by msnbc that details how reporters give D money over R 9-1 proves that point completely wrong.
June 22nd, 2007 at 7:26 amThe most amazing thing about this to me is that Mark Levin has a radio show. If he’s the guy I’m thinking of, he has the squeakiest, most annoying voice in history. His voice makes Bradley Schlozman ’s sound like JJames Earl Jones.
June 22nd, 2007 at 8:32 amI LOVE CALLING HIS PIECE OF SHIT SHOW…I Am “Fred from New Jersey.”
We are gonna hang ya Mark.
June 22nd, 2007 at 9:08 amTo be tax-exempt under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, an organization must be organized and operated exclusively for purposes set forth in section 501(c)(3), and none of its earnings may inure to any private shareholder or individual. In addition, it may not attempt to influence legislation as a substantial part of its activities and it may not participate in any campaign activity for or against political candidates.
http://www.irs.gov/charities/charitable/article/0,,id=96099,00.html
Still think I got nothin ?
June 22nd, 2007 at 10:14 amI’m thinking of Calling Marc levin next week, and using the call for my little internet radio show to mock him. Does he even allow callers who challange him on the air?
June 22nd, 2007 at 11:26 amSo what about the conservative dominance of talk radio? The trouble is those of you on the Left aren’t after “balance,” you are after a monopoly on discourse.
This little video is the epitome of the Left’s actual way of thinking:
June 22nd, 2007 at 1:17 pmhttp://tinyurl.com/3ymjfe
What a bunch of left-wing socialist nutjobs. Don’t you have anything better to do than read this lunatic-fringe ThinkRegression blog? Get a life… then get a job, pinkos.
I’m tired of paying for you fools to sit around doing nothing all day but creating ridiculous conspiracy theories about Republicans and lionizing the Socialistcrats trying to institue a failed ideaology onto America.
What are we going to do about the socialist nutjob dominance of our educational system? Of newspapers? Of television? Of Hollywierd? Of ABC? Of NBC? Of CBS? Of PBS?
June 22nd, 2007 at 4:04 pm“This little video is the epitome of the Left’s actual way of thinking:”
It is you and your party’s fascist ways that more matches the verbiage in the video. Go back to your Brown shirt store.
June 22nd, 2007 at 5:15 pmWhat do we learn from this story? When right wingers want to smear someone and they don’t have any fodder, they just make shit up.
June 22nd, 2007 at 6:46 pm