It’s not only okay, but EXPECTED that they pass into law anything that is on
the conservative agenda.

The hypocrisy is mind-blowing.

The liberals on the SC have changed laws MUCH less than the conservatives, but we sure don’t hear it from our “liberal” media.

SSDD…

Yep, they are. Democrat senators wanted their pound of flesh, but only ended up looking foolish.

Good for Roberts in not answering their questions.

“This is a conservative I can do business with”.

Fuck you, Diane…

She didn’t vote for him, but refused to filibuster, which amounted to the same thing…

Wrong.

Your twisting of “description” and “definition” is hilarious. Let me guess: You flunked English comp, right? A definition is a description of a word.

And, yes, corporations were covered in Il Duce’s description when he used the word “collective”. A corporation, an association, a church, a battalion, or a political party are all “collectives” and anti-individualistic.

Liberalism is the philosophy of individual liberty. It’s why it’s important for individuals to be able to sue large corporations because otherwise individual liberty is crushed.

I’m sorry to make you cry, little girl PIP. And I certainly don’t think the name suits you. You obviously don’t think you are among equals. And I certainly don’t think you’re first at anything except being a jerk.

The Bush/Cheney White House: If it walks like a fascist duck and quacks like a fascist duck, it is a fascist duck.

In your FACE, Mr. Monkey!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

No need to run away crying, Mr. Monkey.

Don’t worry, PIP. They’re tears of laughter.

Just use your “googles” or whatever and check the etymology. You have provided a description, not a definition.

More sophistry. (Hint: no one’s buying it, PIP.)

I will allow that a Fascist regime most certainly would have a say as to how corporations are run, but that does not provide a definition of “fascism” and hence is only incidental to the meaning of the word.

Don’t backpedal too quickly…you’ll break the chain.

You’re still wrong. BloodForOil’s definition was substantially closer than yours, which means he still wins, and (yes) you still lose.

BTW, Mr. Monkey,

I will presume whatever the fukc I damn well please.

And that’s precisely what makes you so entertaining.

Anyway, I do have to skate now…time to make the drive home.

PIP, feel free to try to spin this as a “win” by posting replies I’ll be unable to respond to. We don’t want to completely demolish your self-esteem, now…

I will presume whatever the fukc I damn well please.

Comment by TripMaster Monkey — June 21, 2007 @ 6:03 pm

No need to run away crying, Mr. Monkey.

Just use your “googles” or whatever and check the etymology. You have provided a description, not a definition.

I will allow that a Fascist regime most certainly would have a say as to how corporations are run, but that does not provide a definition of “fascism” and hence is only incidental to the meaning of the word.

I had hoped by this time that you would have been sufficiently moved to undertake some research of your own on fascism, and would have managed to see the error of your previous statements by now. Unfortunately, it seems you’ve instead settled for being deliberately obtuse.

If you don’t want to learn, no one can teach you. Persist in your ignorance, if that is what you truly desire. Just don’t presume to lecture us on a subject you so clearly fail to comprehend.

Sounds an awful lot like you’re running away crying.

BTW, no where in your description do you say anything about “corporations.”

No, your post contains a description, not a definition.

Sophistry. Try again.

and who was it Benny?

Are you asking me? Do your own damned homework.

I don’t even give a shit.

Sounds an awful lot like you’re “running away crying”. Imagine that.

Oh well. I accept your surrender.

Comment by Alejandro

Uh, no. Look up Carswell, Haynsworth and Bork for starters.

Roberts, who pledged to respect precedent during his confirmation hearings, has begun overturning precedents.

Because it doesn’t matter what you say during confirmation hearings. Once you’re in, you’re in. Confirmation hearings are for show.

If you can’t or won’t buy a copy, go to the bookstore and read that chapter. Then get back to us about how realistic it is to describe the Bush administration as “fascists.”

No, your post contains a description, not a definition.

and who was it Benny?

I don’t even give a shit.