White House: It Would Be ‘Awkward’ If Bush Were Investigated By Executive Agency
White House: It Would Be ‘Awkward’ If Bush Were Investigated By Executive Agency
White House spokesperson Dana Perino struggled again today to explain why Vice President Cheney was exempted from a presidential order meant to safeguard classified national security information.
Perino stuck by her argument from Friday that President Bush never intended for the executive order to apply to Cheney any differently than it applies to the president’s own office. Asked why Bush was exempted, Perino claimed it would be “awkward” for the president to ask an executive branch agency “to come in and investigate himself.”
On Friday, Perino refused to say whether Cheney is a member of the executive branch. Today, she returned with an answer: like “every vice president,” Cheney has “legislative and executive functions.” Does that mean he is a member of the executive branch? “Look, I’m not a legal scholar,” Perino said, again calling it an “interesting constitutional question.” Watch it:
Perino claimed ignorance about other key questions in this scandal. She said she didn’t know when President Bush had altered the executive order to exempt Cheney, or why the order was amended in 2003.
Also, Perino rejected a call today from Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) that Attorney General Alberto Gonzales recuse himself from the Justice Department’s internal debates over whether Cheney is violating the executive order. “No, I don’t think that’s necessary,” said Perino.
Transcript:
QUESTION: But, Dana, how could the vice president earlier in the administration argue he didn’t have to turn over records about the energy task force, for example, because he was a member of the executive branch?
PERINO: Ask the Supreme Court.
QUESTION: He clearly stated that.
PERINO: You could ask the Supreme Court, who ruled in his favor.
QUESTION: But he did not say, I’m a member of the legislative branch as well, so I don’t have to — I mean, he clearly stated that there was strong executive power and he didn’t have to turn over these records.
Now, when it suits his interests, he seems to be saying a different legal argument.
PERINO: Look, I’m not a legal scholar. And there’s plenty of them that you can find in Washington, D.C.
But just that very point that you’re making there shows that he has functions in both the executive branch and the legislative branch.
QUESTION: But he didn’t mention those dual functions in the earlier legal arguments at the beginning of the administration. He only used the executive branch argument.
PERINO: Look, you can try to call his office and try to get more information. I’m not opining on his argument that his office is making.
What I can tell you is that the president did not intend for him to be treated separately from himself in this executive order regarding the ISOO office.
QUESTION: So, also though, you mentioned a moment ago that the vice president gets his paycheck from the Senate.
Does the White House then also believe he should get funding for the Vice President’s Office from the legislative branch instead of from the executive branch?
PERINO: I don’t know. These are not decisions…
QUESTION: But you just noted that. You just noted that he gets his paycheck…
PERINO: The reason I noted that is because I’m trying to illustrate the point that he has roles in both the legislature and in the executive branch.
QUESTION: But the National Archives documents they want have to do with his executive branch functions. I mean, the secret documents, one assumes, are from his duties as vice president.
PERINO: If you — in the executive order, the president and the vice president are discharged separately from agencies, in which — it would be awkward if the president, who was the supervisor of this office, was asking that office to come in and investigate himself.
And in this executive order, the president is saying that the vice president is not different than him.
QUESTION: And when did he decide that, just in 2003?
I mean, he…
PERINO: In terms of the executive order? I need to go back…
(CROSSTALK)
QUESTION: He did it for a couple of years before that. He just was doing that out of the good of his heart, or…
(LAUGHTER)
PERINO: I think so.
QUESTION: OK.
(inaudible) also has a 30-year history, which is part of why the National Archives oversight office is concerned because other presidents had provided — other White Houses had provided this information. And so it really is a break with a pattern.
Why is that necessary?
PERINO: I don’t know why the E.O. was amended in 2003. And I can try to go back and find out.
What I do know is that when the president wrote this E.O., it’s clear in the reading of it that he does not intend for the vice president to be seen as separate from himself. And they are not asking someone who is subordinate to them to come in and investigate them. And I think that the ISOO office has had only a complaint about the Vice President’s Office, not about other places within the executive branch.
And so that can be resolved either by the Justice Department or, as I am telling you as the president’s spokesman, he did not intend for the vice president to be seen as separate from himself.
QUESTION: Was the president satisfied that Alberto Gonzales has not responded yet after five, six months of a request by this office to have this issue mediated?
PERINO: I think — I have not asked the president if he’s concerned about that. And I would ask you to call over to Justice Department to find out about their…
QUESTION: Should Alberto Gonzales recuse himself because he was White House counsel?
PERINO: No, I don’t think that’s necessary.
QUESTION: I mean, if the argument was so clear that you’re making about he wasn’t part of the agencies, then why didn’t he make that argument coming back? That’s not the argument he made.
PERINO: I don’t know why he made the arguments that he did.
(CROSSTALK)
PERINO: It might not have been clear to them. And I don’t know all the discussions that they had back and forth between the Vice President’s Office and ISOO.
What I’m telling you is that the — in the reading of the E.O. and in asking about the interpretation of it, that’s the answer I’ve got.
Topic Cloud
ArchivesBlog Roll
Here is the END of the game…
Read it and weep folks as oil crested $70.00 per/br
Brent Crude Oil Dec 07
June 25th, 2007 at 4:45 pm75.31
11:52am ET
She’s just too cute…
My kind of a woman – delivering bullshit lines with such conviction and ability to twist and turn when they try to catch her in a lie. :)
June 25th, 2007 at 4:46 pmIt is time to hold these crooks accountable. Impeach Cheney 1st.
June 25th, 2007 at 4:47 pmDucking, dodging, and dancing! I can’t understand why the public doesn’t realize that there is no such thing as a “liberal” press corps. Apparently the Washington Post is starting to turn on the dark lord. Maybe the dam will break and we will get an impeachment in spite of Pelosi and Reid.
June 25th, 2007 at 4:48 pmpathetic ditz…
June 25th, 2007 at 4:49 pmIt would be “awkward” if GDumbya were investigated by anyone.
The alcoholic, smirking, swaggering little cowboy can’t pass scrutiny at all. No wonder they’re trotting out Dana and the rest of the Keystone Kops to shore up the flood walls.
When the first crack develops, they will all drown and FEMA won’t be able to save them.
I suppose this same defense would be used if Congress were ever to grow a pair and impeach GDumbya and Darth — “it would look ‘awkward’ to impeach us”.
June 25th, 2007 at 4:50 pmPerino claimed ignorance
She got that right at least.
June 25th, 2007 at 4:52 pmThis Administration has always dressed up and massaged its message. To more clearly see what’s really being said about Darth Cheney, take away pretty Perino’s porcelain grin and replace it with the sardonic mask of Adolph Eichman; and then the true, scary nature of the message is heard as it should be. Cheney don’t need no stinkin’ badge. He’s Lord Vader himself. He’s above the law. Hell, he IS the law. This whole group of crooks and liars needs to be brought to justice. Election ‘08 will not have been too soon.
June 25th, 2007 at 4:53 pmLady, Bush in office is awkward.
June 25th, 2007 at 4:53 pmTony Snowjob looked mighty pasty the last time I looked.
June 25th, 2007 at 4:54 pmIs Dana Purina his permanent replacement?
#13: Why? For doing her job?
June 25th, 2007 at 4:55 pmRoboTroll 3100 reports:
Partisan Show Trialâ„¢
Criminalization of Politicsâ„¢
The Vice-President is not a member of the executive Branch.
The President is not a member of the executive Branch, either.
-
-
-
RoboTroll 3100 request to home office:
Different talking points. Current crop are nearing expiration date.
June 25th, 2007 at 4:56 pmWHAT IS IT GOING TO TAKE FOR THIS DO NOTHING CONGRESS TO FILE CRIMINAL INDICTMENTS AGAINST THIS BUNCH?
All they do is sit around and talk and maybe investigate. Enough!
Let’s get some action
June 25th, 2007 at 4:56 pmDana is right, it would be awkward, best to get a neutral 3rd party to investigate.
June 25th, 2007 at 4:56 pm“Look, you can try to call his office and try to get more information. I’m not opining on his argument that his office is making.”
HEYOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
June 25th, 2007 at 4:57 pmPerino: “I really don’t know anymore, but the paycheck is really good”
June 25th, 2007 at 5:00 pmWhat a bubble-gum cutie….
June 25th, 2007 at 5:00 pmso, since the prez and vp have just excluded themselves from the exec. branch, does that mean we get to pick a prez and vp?
June 25th, 2007 at 5:00 pmWhat a bubble-gum cutie….
Comment by CT V_1 — June 25, 2007 @ 5:00 pm
Y’ got dat right CT!!!
June 25th, 2007 at 5:01 pmDana can say whatever she wants, I’ll believe it.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:02 pmI’ll believe my eyes instead. Dana is sure hot.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:03 pmwhere’s that Cut and Run coward Tony Snow?
June 25th, 2007 at 5:03 pmI don’t know how a woman’s skin could be so silky smooth.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:04 pmWe still fail to get to the meet of the matter. This is not just a matter of violating a law, regulation or executive order. It is a matter of:
1. National security: Are documents appropriately classified? These items include staff as well as the President and Vice-President. All we need is for some dufus (and this administration seems to adept at bringing inexperience, dumb people into its highest reaches) to accidentally fail to classify documents with top secret information.
2. Sound management: I have dealt with nuclear and SCI information in my past. The proper procedures to protect such information is burdensome and complicated. It is easy for an individual or staff to develop bad habits and shortcut proper procedures. REVIEWS POINT OUT PROCEDURAL AND PERSONAL SHORTCOMINGS IN SECURITY PRACTICES WITH A VIEW TO IMPROVING THE SECURITY OF INFORMATION AND DETERRING THE DEVELOPMENT OF SHORTCUTS. The failure to utilize ISOO to run such reviews demonstrates an arrogant and cavalier attitude towards the protection of the nation’s security.
3. Bush and CO do not understand management accountability and tend to see their authority in terms of a criminal case. One may only suspect that they are hiding something to be so frightened by a mere review of their practices and procedures. It is telling that previous Democratic and Republican Administrations permitted such reviews.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:04 pmNo more executive privileges then.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:04 pmA/ “Look, I’m not a legal scholar,†Perino said…
B/ Also, Perino rejected a call today from Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) that Attorney General Alberto Gonzales recuse himself from the Justice Department’s internal debates over whether Cheney is violating the executive order. “No, I don’t think that’s necessary,†said Perino.
Well, B certainly proves A.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:04 pmCan we get a Stepford Witness who may (not can) respond to questions about Cheney’s statements uttered out of each side of sneer?
June 25th, 2007 at 5:05 pmThis is a good plan for Rover and Darth…….trot out a perky Katie Couric type, one who has no clue and can’t answer any question, but can SMIIIILE and giggle with the best of them.
These guys have the process down indeed. Next thing we will see Paris Hilton spouting the BushCo Bullsh!t.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:05 pmDana Purina LOL!!
June 25th, 2007 at 5:05 pmTell the Congress to stop the games and impeach Bush & Cheney now!
June 25th, 2007 at 5:06 pmwhere’s that Cut and Run coward Tony Snow?
Comment by Zappatero — June 25, 2007 @ 5:03 pm
What’s wrong with you dude?!?!?!?!
You’re kiddin’, right?
where’s tony? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
June 25th, 2007 at 5:06 pmIt Would Be ‘Awkward’ If Bush Were Investigated By Executive Agency
Gee Dana, ya THINK?
The only real question is do you mean for Bush or the investigators.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:06 pm#15: Hey, RoboTroll 3100. You could try the misdirect-and-stonewall technique. You know, “The President has never claimed that he, or Mr. Vice President, are not members of the Executive branch. That does not, however, mean that they’re limited to the role assigned to the members of the Executive branch. Therefore, it is simplistic to claim that they should be simply treated with the same set of rules and any investigations should not be conducted before a thorough investigation of this interesting Constitutional question is resolved”. It doesn’t make any sense at all, but it’s good stuff for misdirecting and confusing those pesky people asking annoying questions.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:06 pmSince the majority of us agree that our government is pis%ing down our backs and telling us it’s raining…
June 25th, 2007 at 5:06 pmWhy don’t we start things off and hold a national general strike to express the will of the people?
Did anyone ask her about her lies the other day regarding…
And the subsequent chase here:
?????
June 25th, 2007 at 5:10 pmPERINO: Look, you can try to call his (Cheney’s) office and try to get more information.
And good goddamn luck that, too.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:11 pm#31: Come on bartlebee. You need to relax, man. I thought you liberals were ok with this kind of subject.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:11 pmAs long as the TV screen continues to show hot chicks, we’re doomed.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:12 pmIt is telling that previous Democratic and Republican Administrations permitted such reviews.
Comment by JMOHR — June 25, 2007 @ 5:04 pm
And, that Cheney permitted such reviews until 2003.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:13 pmNewsflash Schumer. You are not the decider of what happens in the Executive branch!
June 25th, 2007 at 5:13 pmYeah, so much crap has piled up, it would be real “awkward” for anything to be looked at in the executive at this point. Kinda like those places that get piled up with animal waste and like 200 cats. It takes a while for the neighbors to notice.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:14 pm#31: Come on bartlebee. You need to relax, man. I thought you liberals were ok with this kind of subject. I see a beautiful woman, I’m not going to hide my admiration. Or is it too sexist for a progressive like you? Should I talk about her inner beauty and intelligence before I even dare to mention that she’s damn pretty, too?
June 25th, 2007 at 5:15 pmIt is sexist for anybody stupid.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:16 pmPERINO: Look, you can try to call his (Cheney’s) office and try to get more information.
And good goddamn luck that, too.
Comment by mikey r — June 25, 2007 @ 5:11 pm
They’ll just refer any inquiries to the DOJ, who will say the matter is still under review until, oh, Jan. 20, 2009.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:16 pmAnd neither are Bush and Cheney, because they aren’t a part of the executive branch.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:17 pmBy all means, if it makes the president feel “awkward,” let’s stop insisting on obeying the law and following the Constitution. Heavens, we wouldn’t want any awkwardness.
In fact, most people being investigated feel awkward. You know, drug dealers, child molesters, and the like, so let’s not enforce ANY laws.
Everyone will feel better then. Isn’t that nice….?
June 25th, 2007 at 5:17 pm/sarcasm
And neither are Bush and Cheney, because they aren’t a part of the executive branch.
Comment by Spudge_Boy
SNAP!!!
June 25th, 2007 at 5:18 pmSure Dana’s cute.
She’ll go be on Fox news when this is all over. She’s perfect for that job.
She’s fairly smart too.
But, even cute and smart Dana can’t make this pig look good. She knows who is in the executive. Duh.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:19 pm#48: Well, if you read my first post, I also admired her skill in dodging and ducking questions and delivering bullshit lines.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:20 pm#38,
Good luck on that suggestion as such requires (gasp!) sacrifice for the good of humanity and (larger gasp!) a commitment to the US Constitution. Neither of which, you will find, are available in any discernible quantity here.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:21 pm#13: Why? For doing her job?
Comment by MAF54
I’m not sure lying to the planet is in her job description. I thought her job was to communicate things to the american people (through the press) – and not to make fools out of the press corps. Why those newspeople sit there and get lied to day after day is a huge question for me. If there gonna get lied to anyway, why leave home?
June 25th, 2007 at 5:21 pmWell, if it’s too awkward to be investigated by an Executive Agency, might I suggest a Special Prosecutor?
June 25th, 2007 at 5:21 pmNewsflash Schumer. You are not the decider of what happens in the Executive branch!
Comment by m12
No WE ARE! Your boys going down m12. You know it and i know it.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:22 pm#58: Her job is to tell the people what the President tells her to say. If the President wants to feed the press and public bullshit, that’s what she’s going to do to the best of her abilities.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:23 pmI’m not sure lying to the planet is in her job description.
Comment by Tom — June 25, 2007 @ 5:21 pm
It is. In fact, it is the line before “Stutter, and look cute.”
June 25th, 2007 at 5:23 pmYep Dana just does as she’s told. Poor thing.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:24 pmComment by shane
I don’t need to be paid to comment how vibrant-looking Dana looks. She looks amazing, you’ll get over it.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:24 pmWhy those newspeople sit there and get lied to day after day is a huge question for me. If there gonna get lied to anyway, why leave home?
Comment by Tom
So they get invited to the right dinner and cocktail parties. These people have their priorities and it’s not the good of the American people.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:24 pmComment by Spudge_Boy — June 25, 2007 @ 5:17 pm
Here…
An executive order that Bush issued in March 2003 — amending an existing order — requires all government agencies that are part of the executive branch to submit to oversight. Although it doesn’t specifically say so, Bush’s order was not meant to apply to the vice president’s office or the president’s office, a White House spokesman said.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:25 pmIt would be awkward if these pigs were accountable to anyone.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:25 pm#63,
I know it would be a tough job, but someone’s gotta do it. Oh hell, I will.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:25 pm#63: Hardly. An airhead could not deliver those lines or dance around the questions. Admit it. She’s one cute and smart young woman, and you just hate that she’s playing for the opposite team.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:25 pmJust because Chimpy says it would be akward, does NOT imply it wont happen. Go fetal and start your whining, Dumbya.
Hell, it would be akward for der Shrub, but delicious for the 74% of us who demand justice from ALL levels of government, ESPECIALLY the highest office.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:25 pmWell, if it’s too awkward to be investigated by an Executive Agency, might I suggest a Special Prosecutor?
Comment by Briseadh na Faire
***crickets chirping***
June 25th, 2007 at 5:26 pmHey maf,
Time to go worship your Jeff Stryker DVD collection…
June 25th, 2007 at 5:26 pmMr. Foley is right, her job is to tell the press, and the American people, what the President wants her too. The simple fact they trotted her out, means that Snow is probably throwing up right now, because he simply cannot continue to lie. Why not get a cute, blonde out there, it would be like attacking a kitten. She is too cute to ask the tough questions, and nobody is going to press her.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:26 pmSo tell us, M12, what branch is the President a part of? One of the branches of brush he is constantly clearing on his “ranch”?
HAHAHAHAHAHA!
June 25th, 2007 at 5:27 pmDana is a bubbly Republican woman, there’s much to love about her.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:28 pmI know it would be a tough job, but someone’s gotta do it. Oh hell, I will.
Comment by ForTruth
Only a true American would sacrifice himself to such a task…..
June 25th, 2007 at 5:28 pmGodspeed, ForTruth!
Stand back, Kasinca, and let me handle that. I’m a professional, you’re not.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:29 pmReperv troll admits Dana Purina is lying.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:29 pmYeah time to get Ken Starr on this case. That name sounds like one of the cast in a Jeff Stryker movie.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:30 pmI would make her the Chief spokesperson in my administration – COMING IN 25-30 YEARS!
June 25th, 2007 at 5:30 pmNObody better lay a hand on MY woman!
Or it’s Mr. Saturday Night Special time, fellers!!!
June 25th, 2007 at 5:32 pmActually that would be quite satisfying to be able to spank Dana for every lie she tells. I can see it.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:32 pmOh c’mon Dana — surely you can do better than this! First, why in the world would you face the press without having your ducks in a row after the veep declared something as provocative as his not being part of the Exec Branch? Did you honestly think nobody would ask about that? And why in the world would you make up a reference on “page 18 of the EO” and hope that nobody would check it out? If Olbermann hadn’t done it, some other journalist who checks facts would have. The press hasn’t ALL been reduced to sucking up WH drivel mindlessly.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:32 pmpuke women have crabs.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:32 pm#80: Damn you’re a boy-scout. “Admits”. Have I said anything to the contrary? No. I’ve been quite open about the tactics GOP employs. Lying, obfuscating and stonewalling are standard tactics.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:33 pmMeanwhile, back at the surge:
It’s nice to know the sectarian civil war is over, and it’s just US against Al Qaeda now. – Extra ration of Victory Gin to Winston Smith -
June 25th, 2007 at 5:33 pmMaybe the first time the White House has been honest about anything re: Bush not being a part of the Exec. Branch. From his bio on the WH web site:
George W. Bush is the 43rd President of the United States. He was sworn into office on January 20, 2001, re-elected on November 2, 2004, and sworn in for a second term on January 20, 2005.
Even they agree he wasn’t elected in 2000.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:33 pmComment by kasinca
Dana is NOT an airhead. Let’s keep our compliments civil! I like that she’s cute and has silky skin – comments she probably likes! What do you like about her?
June 25th, 2007 at 5:33 pmWhat do you like about her?
Comment by CT V_1
She could be carried like a six-pack. That’s hot, huh?
June 25th, 2007 at 5:36 pmWell CT V_1
Does she list her strong points on her Match.com profile? Like having a kung foo grip? Can tie a string into a bow inside of her mouth, stuff like that?
June 25th, 2007 at 5:36 pm#38 – Why don’t we start things off and hold a national general strike to express the will of the people?
Count me in. This is as good a place to start as any.
Have one of the big blogs or progressive organizations propose a date, complete with ads in all the Washington DC newspapers as to what’s happening and why, and I think we’ll get their attention d*mned quick.
It’s too bad Pelosi and Reid have failed to listen to the will of the people.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:37 pm#81,
Nobody likes a lying kunt. Some, like yourself, may be attracted to the physical attributes but that is just a sign of extremely limited intelligence.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:37 pmComment by CT V_1 — June 25, 2007 @ 5:33 pm
She can kill ten Muslims Shiteaters ™ with her bare hands!
June 25th, 2007 at 5:38 pm#81 – …I like that she’s cute and has silky skin – comments she probably likes! What do you like about her?
She plays as if she is sexually accessible. That’s why the men in the press corps are creaming themselves.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:38 pmNObody better lay a hand on MY woman!
Or it’s Mr. Saturday Night Special time, fellers!!!
Comment by PRIMVS INTER PARES
What contest are you up for, whippersnapper!
June 25th, 2007 at 5:38 pmWhat do you like about her?
Comment by CT V_1
I like that she’s a spokesmodel for BushCo, and will have to change her name to take Vanna White’s spot in a couple years.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:39 pmComment by CT V_1 — June 25, 2007 @ 5:38 pm
I’m sayin’ that my woman there and I’m a man who cares, so this might be all for you!
June 25th, 2007 at 5:41 pmDude she is sexually accessible, whoops, did I just say that…
June 25th, 2007 at 5:41 pmDoes Dana know how many have claimed her to be “their woman”?
Hell, I did her too.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:42 pmI like Dana’s hair style. It’s kind of boyish, don’t you think?
June 25th, 2007 at 5:42 pmLike I said, you guys have been palming it too long.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:43 pmBy deleting most all of the evidence in the Cheney thread pertaining to the Rockefeller/Israel led globalist conspiracy, TP reveals that it is merely one of hundreds of false fronts, another Rockefeller-backed trojan horse designed to corral dissenters into nice little vertical stove-pipes, where they can be dealt with.
The entire thing is just a scam.
There is no “Progressive Movement”
What could possibly be progressive about censorship?
It’s all just marketing.
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/06/25/cheney-no-change/#comments
June 25th, 2007 at 5:43 pm“awkward” since a President SHOULD be above reproach; however, this guy has certainly reinvented the word – corrupt. As for Pelligrino-waterhead, she continues to outdo herself in terms of total stupidity, doesn’t she? Amazing how she can prostitute herself in this way….while the rest of the country is laughing their tails off at her. Perhaps she doesn’t realize that she is being made a patsy of??
June 25th, 2007 at 5:44 pmI don’t need to be paid to comment how vibrant-looking Dana looks. She looks amazing, you’ll get over it.
Comment by CT V_1
What’s that, about 12 posts on Dana’s looks? At a nickel a post your up to 60 cents. Keep at it little buckaroo.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:44 pmComment by ace — June 25, 2007 @ 5:43 pm
They didn’t censor Flaco… so there! Ha!
June 25th, 2007 at 5:45 pmWhen they send out an airhead woman to “run interference”, you KNOW they’re in deep, deep trouble. Plan for some more bombshells to be outed this week, folks!
June 25th, 2007 at 5:45 pmYou trolls are pathetic. You post nothing of substance. Just accolades of how pretty Dana Perino is. You are nothing but superficial, water-toting, sheep and what you do is COMPLETELY un-american. You care nothing about the abuse of power of this govt. Go watch your Fox News and brush up on the latest Paris Hilton events and leave the thinking to us grown-ups.
Don’t bother replying…..it’ll just be more bullshit.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:45 pm#91 – Dude she is sexually accessible, whoops, did I just say that…
Isn’t amazing that the Toy Emperor’s SpokeT*ts has to resort to that level to feed us ever more Bush*t?
Lets start working on a National Strike Day (or Week, for that matter).
June 25th, 2007 at 5:45 pmand yes….pathetic ditz is an understatement when it comes to describing Dana Perino.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:46 pm“She could be carried like a six-pack. That’s hot, huh?”
Comment by Not Canadian — June 25, 2007 @ 5:36 pm
That’s right! A real man carries hot press secretary to the WH lawn!
“Does she list her strong points on her Match.com profile? Like having a kung foo grip? Can tie a string into a bow inside of her mouth, stuff like that?”
Hey, I only said she wasn’t an airhead, didn’t mean Grace Hopper. If she was that smart, she’d play that “hard to get” card. We wouldn’t want to go there.
“Nobody likes a lying kunt. Some, like yourself, may be attracted to the physical attributes but that is just a sign of extremely limited intelligence.”
No, it’s a sign of young manhood.
“She can kill ten Muslims Shiteaters â„¢ with her bare hands!”
Comment by PRIMVS INTER PARES — June 25, 2007 @ 5:38 pm
To hell with silky skin, then! Can she kill them through the mic, as well?
June 25th, 2007 at 5:46 pmCheney built a whole governing body of his own.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:46 pmIt tells us a great deal about our resident trolls….doesn’t it? They must be butt-ugly to find an airhead like Perino attractive. Every level seeks it’s own I guess…
June 25th, 2007 at 5:46 pmComment by shane
Should I care if you’re keeping track?
June 25th, 2007 at 5:47 pm#104 Tricky Dick’s been out of control from Day One. It’s all coming out like a bad case of the trots now.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:47 pmI wonder if Dana lifts weights? I hope not. I bet she’d look hot dressed like a boy.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:48 pmJeez, she sounds more like Gonzo every day. I don’t know. I don’t think. Blah, blah, blah.
I love the sound of Special Prosecutor. That’s music to my sweet ears.
Dana Perino is a c*nt, plain and simple. But she’s definitely Fox material. Cute and lies like a rug (lies ON a rug?). Just like that Coulter b!tch. C*ntly cute, just like the little republican dickheads like. There are places waiting in hell for both of them. I can only hope it’s sooner than later.
Looks like Mr. Snow might be going there shortly himself. He doesn’t look too good these days. Paybacks, Mr. Snow. Paybacks. Karma is such a b!tch.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:48 pmI knew a boy named Dana once. He worked out.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:49 pmSomeone said it earlier, but it’s worth repeating:
It’s rather awkward to have Darth Cheney and the Toy Emperor act like they are executives on the one hand, and not executives on the other.
Impeach and remove them from office and get on with the business of government. Please.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:49 pmMy hairy palms keep me from leaving my mom’s basement to actually meet girls, so I’m forced to rub-one-out while watching totally unobtainable women!!!
June 25th, 2007 at 5:50 pmMaybe we could discuss the topic as if Snowflake had delivered this performance, rather then this Dull Perino? Just for giggles, huh?
June 25th, 2007 at 5:50 pmTo hell with silky skin, then! Can she kill them through the mic, as well?
Comment by CT V_1 — June 25, 2007 @ 5:46 pm
She can kill Muslim Shiteaters ™ just by lookin’ at ‘m. Their Islamo-Fascist heads explode when they see her fine ass!
June 25th, 2007 at 5:50 pmI meant to say that I hope Dan DOES lift weights. I like a woman with a bicep. I don’t know why, it just turns me on.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:50 pmI like that she’s a spokesmodel for BushCo, and will have to change her name to take Vanna White’s spot in a couple years.
Comment by Zooey
I know she represents two farting dustbags, Zooey. But this is such a wonderful way to blow some steam and comment on a woman who cares so much about her looks.
I would ask Dana to be my first lady, even 25-30 years from now. I think she’d still be hot.
THAT’S HOT!
June 25th, 2007 at 5:52 pmI meant to say that i meant to say that DANA lifts weights. I didn’t mean to say “Dan”. I’ve never been with anyone named “Dan” because Dan would be a boy and I’m not into all that stuff. Eww.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:52 pma full blown troll attack is in progress.
the Megaphone operatives are here in force – off topic as can be.
it originated near the end of this thread:
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/06/25/cheney-no-change/#comments
June 25th, 2007 at 5:54 pmShould I care if you’re keeping track?
Comment by CT V_1
I’m just looking out for your interests. Want to make sure you make your quota for the day. You started earlier sounding like you were motivated and now your just racing to the finish line. What time do you get off work?
June 25th, 2007 at 5:54 pmI don’t need to be paid to comment how vibrant-looking Dana looks. She looks amazing, you’ll get over it.
Comment by COMPOST
Yea. The pockmarks and still active zits give a kind of textured look to her face. Like a relief map.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:54 pmYou boys keep palming it and you’re gonna go blind.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:54 pmALERT: #112 is NAMEJACKER!
I’m sorry, are my compliments of the beauty too politically-incorrect for you?
June 25th, 2007 at 5:54 pmAlright, alright already, back to the pain of discussing Cheney.
Cheney has created more of a shadow govmt than ever before. He has his own army of clones, they are all him.
I agree, Cheney is a stain on the flag, he’s no Patriot, hes the anti-patriot. He’s Dick-tater.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:55 pmI got this off another website. Classic, isn’t it?
A few media outlest picked up on Rahm Emanuel’s idea of defunding Dick Chaney’s office as part of the executive-branch appropriations. “The vice president needs to make a decision,” Emanuel said. Lea Anne McBride, a Chaney spokesperson, said Emanuel “can either deal with the serious issues facing our country or create more partisian politics.”
How f*cking priceless is that!
June 25th, 2007 at 5:56 pmI’m starting new branch of government, the Olive branch, we seek piece (of ass.)
June 25th, 2007 at 5:57 pmI would ask Dana to be my first lady, even 25-30 years from now. I think she’d still be hot.
THAT’S HOT!
Comment by CT V_1
As long as you know she’s a whore, I guess you can keep an eye on her…
June 25th, 2007 at 5:58 pmYea. The pockmarks and still active zits give a kind of textured look to her face. Like a relief map.
Comment by BARTLEBEE
Yeah, CORNtroller thinks that’s artsy. He has figured out they’re pockmarks yet.
June 25th, 2007 at 5:58 pmCheney is a beautiful human-being, a wonderful man, and a great American. We are lucky to live in the time of his reign!
BUSH/CHENEY ‘08!!!
June 25th, 2007 at 5:59 pmYou boys keep palming it and you’re gonna go blind.
Comment by BARTLEBEE
Too late!
June 25th, 2007 at 5:59 pmPeach MInt Awk Ward.
Polly wants a hanging of these traitors, who may or may no be members of the Awkward Branch of the U. S. Government, depending on which side of their mouth that they are currently lying out of..
June 25th, 2007 at 6:00 pmPrime-it, Got those bumper stickers ready yet? They will be a bit hit…. especially for the Dems whow would love to run against that team.
June 25th, 2007 at 6:02 pmThe press secretary should be an elected position. I nominate……. Pam Anderson. Yeah thats it. She can make videos and stuff.
June 25th, 2007 at 6:05 pmAs long as you know she’s a whore, I guess you can keep an eye on her…
Comment by Zooey — June 25, 2007 @ 5:58 pm
Well, I think she’s a principled woman and likes man compliments. If she dumps her husband 25+ years from now for the President-elect (CTV1), I’d help her enroll in AARP. She’d probably still be hot to me. It would beat the local librarian.
June 25th, 2007 at 6:06 pmComment by Upside00 — June 25, 2007 @ 6:02 pm
Send a $10 with self-addressed, stamped envelope to the RNC.
June 25th, 2007 at 6:07 pmErratum: post #135) Should read –
Comment by Upside00 — June 25, 2007 @ 6:02 pm
Send $10 with a self-addressed, stamped envelope to the RNC.
June 25th, 2007 at 6:08 pmALERT: #112 is NAMEJACKER!
Comment by CT V_1 — June 25, 2007 @ 5:54 pm
Thanks for the heads-up, CT V_1. i was getting worried, as the name-jacker CTV_1 was sounding more believable and intelligent than you usually do. I thought something was up.
June 25th, 2007 at 6:10 pmuMM. ACE, This is just normal troll traffic.
June 25th, 2007 at 6:10 pmDon’t flatter yourself to think they follow you around.
PiPpy/CTV1 ‘28!!!
June 25th, 2007 at 6:10 pmWell, I think she’s a principled woman and likes man compliments. If she dumps her husband 25+ years from now for the President-elect (CTV1), I’d help her enroll in AARP. She’d probably still be hot to me. It would beat the local librarian.
Comment by CT V_1
Did you listen to what she was saying? She’s a whore. Whores only have whore principles.
June 25th, 2007 at 6:10 pm“Newsflash Schumer. You are not the decider of what happens in the Executive branch!
Comment by m12 “
Boy m12, you are really slow. Did you miss the part where Bush said that neither he nor Chaney are part of the Executive Branch. Therefore, since they are not part of the Executive Branch, they can’t decide what happens there.
June 25th, 2007 at 6:10 pmPiPpy/CTV1 ‘28!!!
Comment by PRIMVS INTER PARES
I’d settle for VEEP. I still get a mansion to use, right?
June 25th, 2007 at 6:12 pm“Look, I’m not a legal scholar,†Perino said,”
So, where is cancer boy? Up on Nantucket with the shills?
June 25th, 2007 at 6:13 pmI’d settle for VEEP. I still get a mansion to use, right?
Comment by CT V_1 — June 25, 2007 @ 6:12 pm
Of course!!!
Don’t worry, you’ll be Prez when I retire!!!
June 25th, 2007 at 6:13 pmDid you listen to what she was saying? She’s a whore. Whores only have whore principles.
Comment by Zooey
Zoo, never fear, I’ve read the transcript. She could be reading from a prompter for all I know and tryin’ to look serious about it for all I know. Heck, she should replace Fred Thompson on L&0 once she’s all done.
June 25th, 2007 at 6:14 pmCheney is a beautiful human-being, a wonderful man, and a great American. We are lucky to live in the time of his reign!
Comment by DUMBASS INTER ECONTRAS — June 25, 2007 @ 5:59 pm
Reign was a good choice of words Herr Goebell’s.
You two shoudl get a room.
June 25th, 2007 at 6:16 pmOf course!!!
Don’t worry, you’ll be Prez when I retire!!!
Comment by PRIMVS INTER PARES — June 25, 2007 @ 6:13 pm
!!!PiP/CT 2028!!! Promises to be a principled Futurecratic administration! Four full terms!
June 25th, 2007 at 6:18 pm!!!PiP/CT 2028!!! Promises to be a principled Futurecratic administration! Four full terms!
Comment by CT V_1 — June 25, 2007 @ 6:18 pm
We need to become Bush and Cheney scholars. We have a lot of note taking to do!!!
June 25th, 2007 at 6:20 pm“Look, I’m not a legal scholar,†Perino said, again calling it an “interesting constitutional question.†Perino
June 25th, 2007 at 6:27 pmGeez, she’s right, and apparently there are no others employed by this administration as well.
Sure would hate to put my tenure at the WH on my resume after the next election. This biggest bunch of baffoons in world history.
No, Dana, it isn’t an “interesting Constitutional question.” The Vice President should know WHAT BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT HE IS IN! He’s the f-ing VICE PRESIDENT!
June 25th, 2007 at 6:29 pmWe need to become Bush and Cheney scholars. We have a lot of note taking to do!!!
Comment by PRIMVS INTER PARES — June 25, 2007 @ 6:20 pm
The RNC/Yale/Neoconic think-tanks promises to provide us with adequate preparation. This will be tougher than getting through medical school, but imagine: we’ll be a lightning team in the White House, controlling the news, being a daily feature. Our awards based on merit and principle would be endless, billion-dollar corporate opportunities broad thereafter.
June 25th, 2007 at 6:36 pmOh, who am I kidding? I like boys!
June 25th, 2007 at 6:43 pmOVP is not exhempt from classification/security requirements in 32 CFR 2800. The CFR expressly calls for OVP to be audited, reviewed, and subject to prosecution.
Look at this: [Or hit the link under "Anon" below]
http://law.justia.com/us/cfr/title32/32-6.2.9.19.1.html
Executive-agency auditors are required to review OVP. Here are the penalties on OVP staff which the Executive Branch imposes after a review: “(j) Penalties. Any individual breach of security may warrant penalties up to and including the separation of the individual from his employment or criminal prosecution.”
Or is WH asking the public to believe that the President will obstruct justice, shut down invsetigations, and not engage in law enforcement? This takes the President to the Pre-Magna Carta days. Does he want to get thrown into the dungeon?
June 25th, 2007 at 6:48 pmWe have a lot of note taking to do!!!
Comment by DUMBASS INTER ECONTRAS — June 25, 2007 @ 6:20 pm
We sure do.
In fact, rest assured we’re documenting EVERYTHING.
June 25th, 2007 at 6:51 pmAnd you can view those notes at their upcoming trial and sentencing hearing.
June 25th, 2007 at 6:51 pmComment by BARTLEBEE
The PiP/CT administration promises to bury the liberal party for good. Thought November 1994 sucked? You’re gonna love this.
If you’re lucky, we’ll be in the White House as late as 2028. Gear up for the most most effective Presidential administration of all time.
June 25th, 2007 at 7:05 pmWell, if there is a federal penitentary called “The White House”, then you may be right.
June 25th, 2007 at 7:10 pmComment by BARTLEBEE
Oh, you heard? Mr. William Jefferson has aspirations to run for that White House. I think his electoral prospects remain bright. The good thing, he’ll spend more than two terms in “office.”
June 25th, 2007 at 7:17 pmNope.
Think again skippy.
All the babble out of that hole in your face won’t change a thing.
Here come da judge
Here come da judge
June 25th, 2007 at 7:19 pmWilliam Jefferson, lol.
Never mind the never ending parade of criminals you guys have on the chopping block. How’s Dusty Foggo doing?
June 25th, 2007 at 7:22 pmOr hows Libby? Think they’ll like the name “scooter” in prison?
June 25th, 2007 at 7:22 pmGet the point everyone, THIS IS NOT A MATTER OF CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION, IT IS A MATTER OF PROTECTING NATIONAL SECURITY AND COMPETENT MANAGEMENT.
You play into the President’s hands when you let him frame the question as one of breaking the law and being investigated. Our response should be:
WHY DOES THE PRESIDENT RESIST A ROUTINE AUDIT CONCERNING THE CLASSIFICATION AND HANDLING OF CLASSIFIED INFORMATION AS HAS BEEN DONE FOR THE PAST 30 YEARS BY REPUBLICAN AND DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTS?
DOES THE PRESIDENT NOT CARE ABOUT THE PROTECTION OF THE HIGHEST SECRETS IN THIS COUNTRY?
DOES THE PRESIDENT REALLY WANT TO RISK THE SECURITY OF THIS NATION BECAUSE SOME SECRETARY, ASSISTANT OR ASSISTANT TO AN ASSISTANT ON THE PRESIDENT’S OR VICE PRESIDENT’S STAFF FAILS TO PROPERLY CLASSIFY A DOCUMENT OR FAILS TO PROPERLY SECURE THE DOCUMENTS?
WOULD ANY COMPETENT EXECUTIVE SO RISK HIS ORGANIZATION BY FAILING TO TAKE THE SAME STEPS TO AUDIT AND REVIEW SECURITY PROCEDURES AS WOULD OCCUR IN ANY FEDERAL, STATE OR CORPORATE ORGANIZATION (TO INCLUDE THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE ORGANIZATION AND THEIR STAFFS)?
WHY WOULD ANY RATIONAL HUMAN BEING ATTEMPT TO CREATE PHONY CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES THAT COULD UNDERMINE THE RELATIONS BETWEEN BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT TO AVOID A FAIRLY SIMPLE AUDIT TO ENSURE THE SECURITY OF THIS NATIONS SECRETS?
These are the points that must be made first. Then you can argue the legalities and separation of powers issues. However, the reason for such reviews place the issue in context. The break with the tradition of past administration makes the Bush Co position look irrational and the President vain as well as weak.
June 25th, 2007 at 7:22 pmOr hows Delay doing? I really liked his mugshot.
June 25th, 2007 at 7:23 pmOr hows Jack Abramoff?
Hows that fat sack of crap liking his prison term?
June 25th, 2007 at 7:23 pmOr hows Ken Lay?
Long time friend of the Bushy’s doing? I hear he cried when they hauled his ass off.
June 25th, 2007 at 7:24 pmOr hows Mark Foley?
How’s you’re glorious child molester doing now that he’s in disgrace?
June 25th, 2007 at 7:24 pmOr hows Ted Haggard?
Still snorting coke, sucking cock and consulting the president?
LMAO
June 25th, 2007 at 7:25 pmHow hows Claude Allen? How’d that whole “shoplifting ring” thingy work out?
How’d the president every pick a cheif policy advisor who was also part of a tri state SHOPLIFTING RING, lol.
Your boy really knows how to pick em, huh?
June 25th, 2007 at 7:25 pmFART&PEE,
Shut the fukc up.
Sincerely,
PiPpy
June 25th, 2007 at 7:26 pmHow’s that rabid pig Ted Stevens doing, and that whole Vecco Oil thing?
Think he’s gonna do well in jail?
June 25th, 2007 at 7:28 pmShut me up boy.
June 25th, 2007 at 7:29 pmOr how’s John Doolittle doing, now that he’s under investigation for corruption with his pal Jack Abramoff.
You remember Abramoff. Hes the right wing lobbyist all your boys were wining and dining with, who’s currently taking it up the rear in a federal pen.
June 25th, 2007 at 7:30 pmOr hows Tom Feeny? Another Abramoff buddy doing? I hear his investigation is coming along nicely.
June 25th, 2007 at 7:31 pmLots of people in this thread need
TO FAP AT DANA RIGHT NOW
then get back to reality once their balls are empty.
June 25th, 2007 at 7:32 pmOr hows Jerry Lewis doing?
Or hows Gary Miller?
Or hows Tim Murphy making out?
June 25th, 2007 at 7:33 pmOr hows Bob Beauprez’s investigation for CORRUPTION coming?
June 25th, 2007 at 7:33 pmOr hows Conrad Burns?
How about Jim Gibbons?
June 25th, 2007 at 7:34 pmOh and lets not forget the wicked witch of the wetlands, Katherine Harris.
How’s the queen bitch doing now that she’s under not one, but TWO ongoing investigations, one by the Justice Department, and one by the Defense Department?
How’s that sick whore holding up?
June 25th, 2007 at 7:36 pmAnd how’s Bob Ney, now that he plead GUILTY to corruption?
How’s that worthless republican scum handling his THIRTY MONTHS IN PRISON, you inbred hack?
June 25th, 2007 at 7:37 pmOr hows Curt Weldon coming with his “Family Plan” investigation? LMAO
June 25th, 2007 at 7:40 pmHow are all the right wing corrupt pigs you lowlife vermin picked to lead our country, doing now that judgements coming, you hapless inbred prick?
June 25th, 2007 at 7:41 pmBARTLEBEE,
Thanks for telling us the TRUTH about these unamerikkkan Nazi WAR CRIMINAL coxuckers like Bush.
If you get “first among equals” to tell you to “shut up” (a la O’Dildo), you are telling the TRUTH, because
the TRUTH is the ENEMY of Bush and his CRIMINALS and their azzhole-lickers.
June 25th, 2007 at 7:43 pmMy pleasure BGtH.
I was starting to get writers cramp though.
:|
Theres enough of them to start their own country.
June 25th, 2007 at 7:50 pmthe TRUTH is the ENEMY of Bush and his CRIMINALS and their azzhole-lickers.
June 25th, 2007 at 8:51 pmDANA loves ass-play and double penetration. She’s a cum-dumpster from way back, called her “finger-bowl” in high-school.
It might be awkward if Bush and Cheney were both impeached, convicted, removed from office, then sent to the Hague to stand trial for war crimes.
In any case, that is what should happen, to save the soul of America and return us to rule of law under our Constitution and Bill of Rights.
June 25th, 2007 at 10:43 pmYes it would be awkward if anyone under the red Republican loyalty banner of this Administration did his or her job competently.
Damned shocking, I say.
June 26th, 2007 at 12:28 amLots of people in this thread need TO FAP AT DANA RIGHT NOW
Come on. That’s just sexist. I’m sure there are women here as well who find Dana hot, hot, hot!
June 26th, 2007 at 1:43 amShe’s not looking so good. I hope she isn’t coming down with cancer.
June 26th, 2007 at 6:55 amI think he fits the description of enemy combatant. He has no rights at all at this point in time.
June 26th, 2007 at 8:17 amNewsflash Schumer. You are not the decider of what happens in the Executive branch!
Comment by m12 —
Newsflash, me12(yrs. old), There are supposed to be three equal branches of government to provide checks and balances. Yes, I know you neoCONs don’t like accountability from your Dick-tator, but the Constitution calls for it.
June 26th, 2007 at 9:23 amFu@#$ng c%^t. How do these F$%KERS look at them selves in the mirror? All of these MF’s need to be dealt with with extreme prejudice! Them and all who support, enable, and do their bidding…… This administration will end and the protection will end as well…… May they spend the rest of their lives looking over their shoulder for the next subponea.
June 26th, 2007 at 10:20 amThe lady is a liar. Who cares what she looks like.
They want you wanting her ass, that way you
don’t think or listen.
June 26th, 2007 at 12:05 pmIt’s not awkward at all for an executive branch agency to investigate itself. Every executive branch agency I’ve ever heard of has its own internal Office of Inspector General. The system pre-supposes that all employees in the agency are subject to restrictions in their official actions and that there is someone around who makes sure that they behave in accordance with those restrictions.
June 26th, 2007 at 3:19 pmDana Whorino = Deep throat on the microphone.
It doesn’t get any stupider than this.
June 26th, 2007 at 5:01 pmThis is up there with Colin Powell declaring that the US shouldn’t have to abide by the Anti-War crimes, Anti-Torture, Anti-Terrorism provisions of the ICC and the Rome Statues because.. its too inconvenient. Because a noble shining light of democracy and freedom should surely never be burdened with troublesome groundless accusations like that! Yeah, while they were torturing abductees and hostages to death at places like Abu Ghraib, oops! What an amazing coincidence!
ALL HAIL THE HOMELAND, OBEY AND BE SPARED.
June 26th, 2007 at 11:44 pmThis is just more of the same semantics double-talk and dishonesty we’ve gotten from this administration. It has the effect of being a verbal signing statement where the word’s used in the principal document, and publicized to the media and then to the american people, don’t mean what they say.
June 27th, 2007 at 5:22 pmI don’t understand why we are picking up the salary and benefits of the Attorney General and any other select attorneys that take time from America’s business, at the president’s direction, to work so dilligently on how this admiistration can deceive others, including the American people. They are personal attorneys and should be paid by him, not the people they deceive.
Unfortunately, the only ones that can really do anything about these types of situations are the American people, who just can’t seem to muster the courage to do the right thing other than take polls and complain when things they knew about, or should have been aware of, add to the legacy of deceit and undemocratic principles this administration and we, as their forced citizenry, have become famous for all over the world.
I truly wish that someone would walk into the oval office some day and find Perino sucking up on Mr. Bush. She is such a tard! Anytime this administration needs to put a lid on something the send out the bleach blond bimbo to aggravate the press.
Hey, why doesn’t this administration offer Ann Coulter a job as White House spokesperson. What a team that’d be–Dana and Anna! Whew, God help us, please!
June 27th, 2007 at 10:03 pmevery school-age child knows that the executive branch comprises both the Presient and the Vice-President…as georgie-boy is a mental midget, why doesn’t he know it too? his intellectual equals can recite this s%@t by heart.
June 28th, 2007 at 4:38 am