Texas court backs DeLay, but two charges remain.
By on Jun 27th, 2007 at 2:44 pm
Texas court backs DeLay, but two charges remain.
An appeals court in Texas refused today to reinstate a dropped conspiracy charge against former House Majority Leader Tom Delay (R), though the former congressman is still facing two charges of money laundering and conspiring to launder money. The court agreed with a previous judge who threw out the one conspiracy charge because the alleged crime occurred before the law took effect in 2003.
View Most Popular
Advertisement
What We're About
What We're Fighting For
What We're Fighting Against
Featured
Subscribe to the Progress Report
Topic CloudView topics sorted by popularity
Afghanistan
Bachmann
Beck
Boehner
Bush
Business
Cheney
Civil Rights
Congress
Corporate Ethics
Dobbs
Economy
Education
Election
Energy
Environment
Ethics
Fox News
Gingrich
Glenn Beck
Global Warming
Health Care
Immigration
International Relations
Justice
LGBT
Lieberman
Limbaugh
Media
Military
O'Reilly
Obama
Palin
Pelosi
Politics
Race
Radical Right
Religion
Steele
Stimulus
Tea Parties
Tea Party
Terrorism
Veterans
Women's Rights
Visit Our Affiliated Sites
Reports
In-depth studies on select topics
Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.
ArchivesBlog Roll
Gee a big win, there Tom. You got a pass because your crime took place before the law was in effect.
God, I love watching the GOP idiots support this as a win. THAT shows how much concern the GOP and its followers have for the rule of law in this country!!
June 27th, 2007 at 2:50 pmSo he’s morally guilty, yet legally innocent?
June 27th, 2007 at 2:51 pmThe money laundering charges are very serious.
June 27th, 2007 at 2:52 pmComment by VerbalKint
Tom DeLay – 2 counts
William Jefferson – 16 counts.
June 27th, 2007 at 2:55 pmI’m happy with the money laundering and conspiracy charges. :)
June 27th, 2007 at 2:55 pmThe money laundering charges are very serious.
Comment by VerbalKint
Isn’t that an IRS violation and are those laws vaguer and easier to convict on.
June 27th, 2007 at 2:56 pmTom DeLay – 2 counts
William Jefferson – 16 counts.
Comment by CT V_1
The number of charges does not determine one’s level of corruption, CT. Let’s see how the convictions shake out, shall we?
BTW, this is not a contest. They’re both scum and need to rot in jail.
June 27th, 2007 at 2:57 pmTom DeLay – 2 counts
William Jefferson – 16 counts.
Comment by CT V_1
The difference is Dems don’t support Jefferson. But you guys are here defending Delay.
June 27th, 2007 at 2:57 pmJefferson did it too! Then he did it x1445!
But it’s totally, totally, understandable and typical and expected to see the subject pass. I mean, Jefferson is already a mute on this board. Must be politically motivated, a show-trial, or baseless. Poor Jefferson.
June 27th, 2007 at 2:57 pmComment by shane
You’re defending Jefferson by remaining mute. With DeLay, at least, there’s some reasonable concern that the DA could be politically motivated in charging him, given that that court has already dropped at least one of the original charges against DeLay.
June 27th, 2007 at 3:01 pmTom Delay – 2 counts. William Jefferson 16 counts and their both guilty as hell so what’s your point?? You sound like Tom Dleay when he said his cheating on his wife was not as bad as Newt’s because he, Tom Delay found God. You repuke never stop do ya??
June 27th, 2007 at 3:02 pmHey C\/nt_1…LOOK OVER THERE…IT’S PARIS HILTON!!
Comment by MsJoanne
Look over there! It’s one more young chick for you to be jealous about! If Rosie O’Donnell was jailed for the same reason, you’d have no problem with the same level of coverage, dolt.
What’s up with the fat V in the middle?
June 27th, 2007 at 3:03 pmTrumped up charges slip sliding away…
People are tired of this crap — first the Libby thing (lied about a non-crime), then the US Attorney thing (perfectly legal firings), now it looks like the Delay charges are pretty bogus.
Is this what the Dems want to be perceived as — the over-prosecuting party?
I guess when your policies aren’t popular you need to distract people with something else, right?
June 27th, 2007 at 3:03 pmComment by marcus robinson
I won’t be muted because your own hypocrisy makes you uncomfortable. You shouldn’t pretend that my bringing up Mr. Jefferson has no merit.
June 27th, 2007 at 3:04 pmMr. Jefferson is cooling his drinks with a few C-note ice cubes. You would think the dems would be calling for his resignation from office, what with their outrage at political corruption ala DeLay. But no, they cant do that, the most corrupt city in America badly needs their corrupt congressman in this time of need.
America’s Grandmother must have lost her broom, cleaning up the culture of corruption seems to have lost its impetus.
June 27th, 2007 at 3:08 pmJefferson did it too! Then he did it x1445!
But it’s totally, totally, understandable and typical and expected to see the subject pass. I mean, Jefferson is already a mute on this board. Must be politically motivated, a show-trial, or baseless. Poor Jefferson.
Comment by CT V_1 — June 27, 2007 @ 2:57 pm
Can you cite a single TP poster who said that Jefferson’s indictment was either “politcally motivated”, a “show trial” or “baseless”?
No? Then STFU.
June 27th, 2007 at 3:08 pmBringing up Jefferson is laughable. No one, not anyone in the party or those who are democrats support that. But don’t miss Brittany over there. Good way to throw everyone off the issue. Just like your jealousy comment. Oh, yeah, baby…I am sooooooo jealous.
Who was it that stopped many of the files from finding the light of day? The GOP.
June 27th, 2007 at 3:10 pmSpit, I think he’s trying to say that DeLay’s was political…but since the DoJ is owned by the GOP, it’s an amusing try at diversion at best.
More PARIS, LINDSAY, etc.
June 27th, 2007 at 3:11 pmYou’re defending Jefferson by remaining mute. With DeLay, at least, there’s some reasonable concern that the DA could be politically motivated in charging him, given that that court has already dropped at least one of the original charges against DeLay.
Comment by CT V_1 — June 27, 2007 @ 3:01 pm
Are you serious? Anyone who “remains mute” is demonstrating support? Wow. That’s some weird rules of evidence you follow there, CT V_1.
Using your same argument, given that Jefferson is a Democrat and the current Justice Department has established a record of partisanship in prosecutorial decisions that is unmatched, why do you assume that there could be no “reasonable concern” about a political element to Jefferson’s indictment?
June 27th, 2007 at 3:12 pmNo? Then STFU.
Comment by spit take
Really clever, dirty liberal. I’m nice enough not to send that dreaded police-state to your premises of roach-like existence so they wrestle you to the ground. They’ll require you to STFU, nuncle.
Liberals want Jefferson acquitted for the sake of diversity, LOL. I don’t need you to point it out directly. Criminals can get convicted without a confession, thankfully.
Liberals, so predictable.
June 27th, 2007 at 3:14 pmPut Delay on trial already, I want to see him in prison before I grow too old.
June 27th, 2007 at 3:15 pmI can’t wait to see him on Faux News in his orange jumpsuit!
June 27th, 2007 at 3:16 pmComment by spit take
I’m sorry, I don’t think it registered in your canned brain. All of you planned ahead of time for fake condemnation when Jefferson was actually indicted, then slowly got right back to bashing nobody but Republicans, primarily ones who haven’t even been indicted, a state of speculation from all of you.
There is no reasonable concern. The FBI has him on tape, money in the freezer, etc., etc., etc. This is generally an open-and-shut case. There you go, ignore the evidence and use your ignorance as a cover to defend the con. The FBI conducted a thorough investigation and turned over a great case to the U.S. Attorney. It’s pretty much exempt from the troubles at the department.
June 27th, 2007 at 3:20 pmComment by Buck — June 27, 2007 @ 3:15 pm
All of you have been bragging about DeLay for years now, when there’s no clear evidence of his guilt.
I predict an acquittal for Tom DeLay, so I don’t need to stoop down to your level and “pretend” anything. It’s also good to see all of you pretend to support the troops, but that’s a different thread.
June 27th, 2007 at 3:24 pmThe difference between Delay and Jefferson is that Delay was excceedingly effective in his job and it drove the Dems nuts. They wanted to get rid of him so they trumped up some charges.
Jefferson is just a nobody who broke the law. Repubs don’t really even care about nailing him as he is politically ineffective anyway.
But I have a question: the Dems are the morally superior party so they should be putting morals above politics and prosecute both equally, right?
June 27th, 2007 at 3:25 pmLiberals want Jefferson acquitted for the sake of diversity, LOL. I don’t need you to point it out directly. Criminals can get convicted without a confession, thankfully.
Liberals, so predictable.
Comment by CT V_1
That’s a blatant lie, CT. You have NEVER seen any of us defending Jefferson’s behavior. The same cannot be said about the right’s whining defense of DeLay.
June 27th, 2007 at 3:28 pmTom Delay is innocent. I can’t believe these trumped up charges!!!
Don’t Stop the Hustle Tom
June 27th, 2007 at 3:29 pmAll of you have been bragging about DeLay for years now, when there’s no clear evidence of his guilt.
I predict an acquittal for Tom DeLay, so I don’t need to stoop down to your level and “pretend†anything. It’s also good to see all of you pretend to support the troops, but that’s a different thread.
Comment by CT V_1
I rest my case.
June 27th, 2007 at 3:30 pmRight, silicon, we agree on that…both should be in jail.
Along with about 120 other Rightards!
June 27th, 2007 at 3:30 pmSo, another crooked Bush crony judge is protecting another crooked Bush minion. There is no longer any justice – if you’re connected you’re free, if not you go to jail. Why should anyone bother to obey the law? Welcome to Amerika.
June 27th, 2007 at 3:30 pmRight, silicon, we agree on that…both should be in jail.
Along with about 120 other Rightards!
Comment by Zimzone — June 27, 2007 @ 3:30 pm
These is exactly the problem.
If DeLay can’t get a true jury of his peers, he may be convicted on prejudice alone.
June 27th, 2007 at 3:33 pmLove the genetic fallacy that the right is using. Well, you’re a libburrul so you must support a corrupt libburrul when not one person has come and said Jefferson shouldn’t be pursued.
Of course, it’s kinda hard to do when alot of the evidence has been held up by the GOP.
June 27th, 2007 at 3:35 pmComment by PRIMVS INTER PARES
I doubt that DeLay is going to be able to get a fair trial out of this.
June 27th, 2007 at 3:36 pmComment by MsJoanne
Haven’t you recognized by now that you’re a partison loon? I mean, “genetic fallacy”? The rest of your statement was non-sensical rubbish.
June 27th, 2007 at 3:38 pmI doubt that DeLay is going to be able to get a fair trial out of this.
Comment by CT V_1 — June 27, 2007 @ 3:36 pm
It is a shame, DeLay is a noble and honorable man.
June 27th, 2007 at 3:40 pmHey CT clown, you forgot:
Bob Ney – convicted, in Federal Prison
Duke Cunningham, in Federal Prison
David Safavian (WH official) convicted, sent to prison
Scooter Libby – convicted of multiple felonies, sentenced to prison
Steven Griles (Deputy Interior Secretary) – convicted, sentenced to prison
Kyle “Dusty” Foggo – Bush appointee, #3 man at CIA – indicted for taking bribes from those who bribed Duke Cunningham – Gonzales FIRED the prosecutor who took out both of them
Ken Tomlinson – head of CPB (over PBS and NPR) – caught running a horse racing/bookie operation out of his government office; this vindicated Bill Moyers, who was bashed by people like you for complaining that Tomlinson was “corrupt.”
This is just a partial list, I could go on and on. John Doolittle, (R-CA) is another California Rep. on the verge of indictment along with Tom Feeney of Florida.
June 27th, 2007 at 3:44 pmThree predictions from the sage CI:
1. Delay walks away from these charges.
2. The loons here at TP blame it on Halliburton or Bushitler and go crying to their mommies.
3. I laugh hysterically.
June 27th, 2007 at 3:45 pmDelay is just a cockroach, so just spray him with Raid.
June 27th, 2007 at 3:46 pmComment by sponson
Hey sponson clown: you’ve already convicted DeLay through the media! You have no credibility to speak! The media only tells you what you want to hear! I think we ought to change corporate owners, per your plan for talk radio, to encourage more “viewer diversity.”
Braindead hippie!
June 27th, 2007 at 3:47 pmComment by Cynicon Implant
I’ll have the popcorn ready.
June 27th, 2007 at 3:48 pmWilliam “Frozen Assets” Jefferson is the laughing stock of this particular ‘librul’ family, CT. Do we talk about him every waking moment of the day? Of course not. No more than we talk about Tom “Too Much Bug Spray In His Diet” Delay. But yes, our talk about these two men is a slight bit different.
Right now, the House Ethics committee is conducting its own investigation of Mr. Frozen Assets. Mr. Frozen Assets lost his position on his committee, and is hanging on to his seat simply because the law says he’s innocent until proven guilty.
Mr. Bug-spray Diet, on the other hand, was never investigated by his peers. While Mr. Frozen Assets lost his committee positions a year before his indictments were handed down, Mr. Bugspray Diet held onto his position as House Speaker until after he was indicted. In fact, your party gave him a pass on House ethics rules, until a groundswell of criticism from people like us made them say, “Well, maybe we SHOULD relieve him of his position as speaker as the law requires.” It was his choice to bow out of the election, so the reason he is Mr. Bugspray instead of Representative Bugspray is because of _his_ choice.
In the end, I hope justice finds both Mr. Bugspray and Mr. Frozen Assets. Bugspray Man, however, will be a sweater victory considering how much you blowhards supported him. Notice, the Democrats AREN’T supporting Frozen Assets like you tools supported Bugspray. Got it? Good.
June 27th, 2007 at 3:52 pm#47, right after you go f*ck yourself.
Try to expand your tiny little mind, then you might understand what I wrote.
Oh, sorry, my bad…mission impossible.
Now, back to that f*cking yourself. See ya!
June 27th, 2007 at 3:56 pmCT,
MsJoanne is a good person. We must remember to be respectful, even if we disagree some of the time.
June 27th, 2007 at 3:57 pmMy local paper’s headline says: High court upholds dismissal of indictment against DeLay
Which prompted two of my co-workers to say: “See? Ronnie Earl had a political vendetta”
To which I said: ” Only one of the charges was dropped, the other two still stand.”
Which then made jaws drop and brought on deafening silence. I do like a quiet office. Perhaps my co-workers should read more than just the headlines.
June 27th, 2007 at 3:58 pmComment by Jeremy
“Got it? Good.”
You seem hungry for the dilly-dally response. Too bad you won’t get it.
Listen, shiteater. You do support Mr. Jefferson. He’s your perfect democrat. You will see to it that the media doesn’t bother him as they do Tom DeLay so that he receives a fair trial. As for Rep. DeLay, you have not been providing that due process. You just want a political opponent to tally-down.
I don’t accept arguments from loons, they have no factual basis. Try again, please.
Rejected.
June 27th, 2007 at 3:59 pmWow….someone is purging comments.
June 27th, 2007 at 3:59 pmPIP, ya think? Hmmm.
Nah, I have to take a pass this time. But thanks for the reminder. I should take these attacks like Mrs. Edwards; god bless her. But I’m not a good southern gal. Something I have to work on, I suppose. ;)
June 27th, 2007 at 4:01 pmComment by CT V_1 — June 27, 2007 @ 3:59 pm
How many times has the Liberal Media put DeLay’s mug shot up on a screen or in publication?
More times than I can remember.
Now, what about Jefferson??????????
June 27th, 2007 at 4:02 pmI don’t accept arguments from loons, they have no factual basis. Try again, please.
Rejected.
Comment by CT V_
You are SO FULL OF SH*T, you must have really dark brown eyes…
And please give PRIMUS the reach around once in a while, you greedy gay horn-dog!
June 27th, 2007 at 4:03 pmHow many times has the Liberal Media put DeLay’s mug shot up on a screen or in publication?
More times than I can remember.
Now, what about Jefferson??????????
Comment by PRIMVS INTER PARES
BOO FRIGGIN’ HOO!!!! Don’t get your frilly panties all in a wad, your crook is just more popular than Jefferson.
June 27th, 2007 at 4:06 pmComment by Not Canadian
Your deportation orders should be in the mail. Also, you will be fitted with an ankle-bracelet to ensure that you never reenter.
June 27th, 2007 at 4:07 pmNot American,
June 27th, 2007 at 4:08 pmIf you will not admit that the Libero-Islamist Media has influenced potential jurors, than your Muslim master have failed to train you.
BOO FRIGGIN’ HOO!!!! Don’t get your frilly panties all in a wad, your crook is just more popular than Jefferson.
Comment by Not Canadian — June 27, 2007 @ 4:06 pm
A mugshot is a mug shot. ALL representatives are popular. ALL congressional corruption should receive equal air time.
Again, your minimizing the accusations, as you expect me not to point out.
June 27th, 2007 at 4:10 pmComment by CT V_1
You own this thread baby! :D
June 27th, 2007 at 4:11 pmComment by PRIMVS INTER PARES
I think the “Not Canadian” moniker is misleading. Isn’t this one supposed to be a conservative (or normal) commentator?
TAKE PiP’s advice! Change your screen name to ‘Not American.’
June 27th, 2007 at 4:12 pmGee, C\/nT_1…think it might have something to do with Jefferson actually stepping down vs. Delay hanging around after he was indicted? Can’t imagine why one would be favored over the other.
June 27th, 2007 at 4:12 pmRabid TPers listen to them go crazy!
June 27th, 2007 at 4:13 pm8>) cool!
FLACO!!!
What’s up my man!?!
How is everything?
June 27th, 2007 at 4:13 pmJefferson stepped down because of his guilty conscience. DeLay, on the other hand, is innocent.
June 27th, 2007 at 4:15 pm>Comment by Jeremy
>>“Got it? Good.â€
>You seem hungry for the dilly-dally response. Too bad you won’t
>get it.
Actually, I’m hungry for a 6′ ham and cheese sub, but that’s beside the point…
>Listen, shiteater. You do support Mr. Jefferson. He’s your perfect
^^^^^^
PERSONAL ATTACK: I guess that means you concede the argument?
And wow. I support Frozen Assets? Funny…I always thought that he was a scumbag as bad as Edwin Edwards, and much of the same bullshit that Edwards brought he brings as well. CT, you need to get your crystal ball checked. I support him about as much as I support Edwards…which is to say that if a decent independant or Republican came up, I’d vote for him over either of those two douchbags any day of the week. Too bad in Edwards case it was a choice between Edwin “The Thief” Edwards and David DuKKKe.
>democrat. You will see to it that the media doesn’t bother him as
>they do Tom DeLay so that he receives a fair trial. As for Rep.
>DeLay, you have not been providing that due process. You just
>want a political opponent to tally-down.
Actually, _I_ personally have done nothing to ensure or restrict the media’s coverage on either man’s … ethical shortcomings. Damn, 0 for 2, CT. I hope that Crystal ball is still under warranty.
As I see it, both men are receiving a fair trial. I will be disappointed if either man goes free, but I’ll LOVE it if Bugspray is convicted. Too bad I don’t know where you live, because if I did, I’d be wallpapering your house in ‘Tom Delay Found Guilty’ newspapers, just to piss you off. ^_- Nah, not really, but if your sorry carcass is still on here then, I’ll gladly rub your nose in it for being such a neocon troll and tool.
>I don’t accept arguments from loons, they have no factual basis.
^^^
We call this an Ad Hominem (Against the Person) attack, and the second (run-on) sentence above is a Association Fallicy — all arguments from loons have no factual basis.
You scream ‘LIBRUL MEDIA’ over and over and over and over again, on a site where we’ve already posted time and time and time again evidence that suggests this ‘LIBRUL MEDIA’ you foam at the mouth over exists solely in your imagination. Not once have you demonstrated that this ‘LIBRUL MEDIA’ you scream about actually exists. Instead, you keep screaming and screaming, thinking that one day we’ll actually suddenly see your own particular light and agree with you. It shouldn’t surprise you that we think you are a fool.
>Try again, please.
Sure. Why not. Installing drivers on a computer is boring and tedious work. Dissecting this so-called argument of yours is an entertaining diversion.
>Rejected.
Well, somebody here is rejected, but I don’t think it’s me…
June 27th, 2007 at 4:17 pmFLACO!!!
What’s up my man!?!
How is everything?
Comment by PRIMVS INTER PARES
—————————————————————
YOU HAVE TO SPEAK UP PRIMVS INTER PARES.
June 27th, 2007 at 4:18 pmCANNOT HEAR YOU OVER THE RABID TPERS HERE. 8
Comment by Jeremy — June 27, 2007 @ 4:17 pm
Geez, Jeremy.
Take a Midol!!!
June 27th, 2007 at 4:20 pmComment by MsJoanne
STEPPING DOWN? He’s still a Representative, isn’t he? He stepped down from a freakin’ committee – one he should have never been assigned to from the beginning. DeLay stepped aside from the Maj. Leader position, as per Republican rules. He may not have officially resigned until June 2006, but you’re not bashing Jefferson. He’s still collecting a paycheck from the treasury.
June 27th, 2007 at 4:21 pmnote: they’re not saying he didn’t do it, just that he did it before the rules were in place… a beacon of integrity! no wonder consternative Christian groups are clamoring to have him as a keynote speaker…
June 27th, 2007 at 4:21 pmFLACO!!!
What’s up my man!?!
How is everything?
Comment by PRIMVS INTER PARES
—————————————————————
YOU HAVE TO SPEAK UP PRIMVS INTER PARES.
CANNOT HEAR YOU OVER THE RABID TPERS HERE. 8
Comment by Flaco — June 27, 2007 @ 4:18 pm
WHAT’S UP FLACO!?!
June 27th, 2007 at 4:22 pmnote: they’re not saying he didn’t do it, just that he did it before the rules were in place…
Comment by Pete Bogs — June 27, 2007 @ 4:21 pm
Exactly!!!
How could he break a law that didn’t exist???
These were trumped up charges from the beginning!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
June 27th, 2007 at 4:24 pmPRIMVS INTER PARES:
Nah, I don’t think I will. You can always go to another blog if you don’t like my commentary on this one. Here’s a few hints for you.
http://www.redstate.com
http://www.freerepublic.com
I never post on those. I don’t believe in trolling another political idiology’s boards…obviously unlike you and yours. ;)
June 27th, 2007 at 4:24 pmideology, even
June 27th, 2007 at 4:25 pmYou’re wrong. I think Jefferson should step aside completely. I am not sticking up for him in any way, shape, or form. He looks guilty as hell to me, but I haven’t heard the case.
The wee difference was the role that Delay wouldn’t step down from. There’s a bit of a difference between a rep and a speaker, don’t you agree? But you think Delay’s innocent so there’s nothing wrong with what he did. I’ve said all I will about that. He wasn’t found innocent of the headline that started this thread, he got off on a technicality, which you seem to want to ignore.
You think I support a dirty dem and loathe a dirty repub. I don’t. I say f*ck them all. If they’re dirty, fry their a$$ and send them away for a long, long time. Just like Scooter. If you do the crime, do the time (jeez, I just broke out in the Baretta theme song. Ugh!)
It all comes down to what they are doing for and against the people of this country. A dirty rep is no good to or for anyone.
June 27th, 2007 at 4:28 pmI never post on those. I don’t believe in trolling another political idiology’s boards…obviously unlike you and yours. ;)
Comment by Jeremy — June 27, 2007 @ 4:24 pm
Jeremy, I am personally offended.
I tried to give some helpful advice, and you insult me.
I am a progressive, and as such I post here…
True progressives do not kick people out who they disagree with,
Your problem is that you are an Islamo-Stalinist with a pro-Muslim agenda, you do not want free speech because you have been brain-washed. Take the Midol and chill out.
June 27th, 2007 at 4:28 pm#
[SNIP]
>I am a progressive, and as such I post here…
I seriously doubt it.
I haven’t seen a single indication that you’re progressive and pro-rule-of-law.
>True progressives do not kick people out who they disagree with,
No, but honest people don’t go and join a group whose political views are opposed to their own for the sole purpose of stirring up trouble either.
>Your problem is that you are an Islamo-Stalinist with a pro-Muslim
1) Personal Attack of a decidedly neocon flavor (”Islamo-Stalinist”)
2) Falsehoods.
a) While I have nothing against moderate Muslims (or moderate
Jews or Christians, for that matter), I myself am happily ag-
nostic slipping towards Athiest (”God surely couldn’t want
THIS shit to be going on, now would He?”)
b) Stalin is a (thankfully) dead relic of a bygone era. Soviet
style Communism is dead. Too bad you and yours blinked at
China, and now they own us. The closest I get to Commu-
nism is a demand for strict accountability and responsibility of
our corporate so-called ‘citizens’.
>agenda, you do not want free speech because you have been
>>Nah, I don’t think I will. You can always go to another blog if you
>>don’t like my commentary on this one. Here’s a few hints for you.
‘You can always go…’ seems to me like a suggestion, not a directive. And…
>brain-washed. Take the Midol and chill out.
… ‘take the Midol and chill out’ sounds like you’re telling me to shut up…i.e. depriving me of free speech. Let me guess. Free speech is fine for you, but all the rest of us better shut up and tow your line, eh? Like I said before, No…I don’t think I will. Gotta problem with that? Let’s borrow your favorite man’s favorite expression…
In the great words of Cheney the Dick…
“Go F*ck Yourself…”
June 27th, 2007 at 4:37 pmComment by PRIMVS INTER PARES — June 27, 2007 @ 4:28 pm
Ms. Joane and Jeremy, I should of used my loving Republican side of debate. To the extent of my scrantonicity, I attest to the righteousness of my deepest apologalas.
Goode Bless.
June 27th, 2007 at 4:39 pmPiP, you kick ass!
June 27th, 2007 at 4:41 pmComment by Jeremy — June 27, 2007 @ 4:37 pm
HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
…
…
…
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
June 27th, 2007 at 4:47 pmComment by Jeremy — June 27, 2007 @ 4:37 pm
Ok, Ok.
I’m Metaprogressive ™
June 27th, 2007 at 4:48 pm#74:
I rest my case…
June 27th, 2007 at 4:49 pmPiP, you kick ass!
Comment by CT V_1 — June 27, 2007 @ 4:41 pm
Thanks CT.
I’m glad that you apologized to MsJ, but Jeremy didn’t deserve it.
June 27th, 2007 at 4:49 pm…….but Jeremy didn’t deserve it.”
Comment by PRIMVS INTER PARES — June 27, 2007 @ 4:49 pm
Does he support Muslimshiteaters ™? If so, I withdraw the apology?
June 27th, 2007 at 4:54 pmDoes he support Muslimshiteaters â„¢? If so, I withdraw the apology?
Comment by CT V_1 — June 27, 2007 @ 4:54 pm
He is controlled by Islamo-Stalinists, so yeah, he supports them!!!
June 27th, 2007 at 4:56 pmApology for Mr. Jeremy-stalin is hereby WITHDRAWN.
MsJoan, I hope you’ll still accept yours.
June 27th, 2007 at 5:03 pmWow. Looks like this thread has some trolls of the age of about 10 years old, with all the extended exclamation points and what not.
June 27th, 2007 at 5:11 pmComment by CT V_1
You own this thread baby! :D
Comment by Flaco
The schizophrenic speaks to itself, AS USUAL.
Don’t hurt yourself trying to pat your own back to hard!
BTW, you should get a refund from your flunky Community College, puke, you haven’t learned ANYTHING WORTH A SH*T.
June 27th, 2007 at 5:28 pmComment by Not Canadian
DEPORT! DEPORT! You’ve overstayed your fake visa, please leave.
June 27th, 2007 at 5:35 pmComment by Not Canadian
By the way, somebody’s path of education is not for you to criticize. You won’t get anywhere in life, so I’m already better off than you.
June 27th, 2007 at 5:38 pmConsidering that Community Colleges have helped millions of people move onto 4-year schools (which I’m headed to) and good careers… again, your stereotype have no merit. Get yourself updated, now.
June 27th, 2007 at 5:40 pmIt is quite amusing to watch the trolls, especially Flaco and CT try to defend Tommy Boy Delay. It just goes to show how they find ANYTHING a Repug does in the name of the party is OK (Like sucking Jack A’s teat, as almost all of them have done, including Darth hissown self) and twisting the rule of law to fit their agenda.
But then integrity and constitutional advocacy has never been the current Cabal’s strong suit and the trolls here just keep on worshipping at their feet.
But 08 is fast approaching and the sewage swirling round the bowl will be smelly and leave some bad streaks but they will get cleaned up.
June 27th, 2007 at 6:27 pmCHENEY 2008!!!
June 27th, 2007 at 6:37 pmPrimus, U da MAN!!! Would dream for that ticket. Now, if you can just get his pacemaker to last past ‘08……….
June 27th, 2007 at 6:44 pmFREE ON A TECHNICALITY!!
June 27th, 2007 at 6:45 pmWhoopeeee!
I’ll bet the Repugs are proud they can now use the technicalities they’ve accused poor people of using for decades to avoid the horrors of our penal colonies.
PRIMATE INTER PARES you are a fool.
June 27th, 2007 at 6:46 pmFREE ON A TECHNICALITY!!
Comment by Shirley — June 27, 2007 @ 6:45 pm
Yeah, a technicality, can you believe it?!?
I mean, just because he did not break the law, doesn’t mean that the Islamo-Leftists shouldn’t ruin his life!!!!
June 27th, 2007 at 7:07 pm♠
June 29th, 2007 at 6:40 pm