Comments on: Federal Doolittle probe digging deeper.

By: Jeff Gannon

Jeff Gannon — Thu, 28 Jun 2007 21:11:33 +0000

Jeff, please forgive me, but I donâ€™t understand your post. I think you are disagreeing with me or making a partisan point, but Iâ€™m not sure.

Oh no. Don’t get me wrong. I was just talking about the dems I’ve serviced in the past. They all like the judicial play. A stern judge or a lawyer asking them questions.

By: Jay Randal

Jay Randal — Thu, 28 Jun 2007 20:58:18 +0000

How many times do I have to say on TP that Doolittle is done and stick a fork in him please?!

By: ForTruth

ForTruth — Thu, 28 Jun 2007 20:36:17 +0000

“Lights out at the boys school”

By: Sharon and Holden Dicks

By: Just Me

Just Me — Thu, 28 Jun 2007 20:30:39 +0000

Jeff, please forgive me, but I don’t understand your post. I think you are disagreeing with me or making a partisan point, but I’m not sure.

I assume, and correct me if I’m wrong, that the concept of ‘innocent until proven guilty’ is central to our justice system, it applies equally, in court at least, to everyone accused of a crime, and is supported by people of all political stripes. If this assumption is not correct, I am very concerned for the health of our republic.

By: Gregor Samsa

Gregor Samsa — Thu, 28 Jun 2007 20:28:51 +0000

And there is that “liberal” media again, calling Abramoff a “disgraced lobbyist”.

They should call him what he is: Corrupt, nefarious, influence-peddling Republican operative.

By: barrelhse

barrelhse — Thu, 28 Jun 2007 20:21:33 +0000

Wait a minute, I KNOW Mr. Doolittle has vehemently denied any wrongdoing whatsoever, it’s myfuckingwife, nothingtoseehere, demowitchhunt, and it’notfair.
So why do they keep investigating?

Jeez, the poor guy.

By: Jeff Gannon

Jeff Gannon — Thu, 28 Jun 2007 20:20:11 +0000

innocent until proven guilty.

Oh yes. That’s a very popular role-play with the dems. In the end, they all plead guilty.

By: Just Me

Just Me — Thu, 28 Jun 2007 19:49:02 +0000

Let’s remember – innocent until proven guilty. I’m glad to see due diligence is being done with an investigation. If a crime has been committed, they will need all the facts and evidence to support a guilty verdict. Until then, all we know is that an investigation is taking place – it doesn’t do our justice system any good to jump to conclusions.

I know all of this is obvious, but it just seemed like a good time to get it out there.

By: Zooey

Zooey — Thu, 28 Jun 2007 19:41:31 +0000

Doolittle must be quite uncomfortable from the constant deep probing.

By: Rusty

Rusty — Thu, 28 Jun 2007 19:26:52 +0000

Looks like he will have a bunk-mate in the form of Tom Feeney (R-FL):

http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/003559.php#more

By: Ms Marple

Ms Marple — Thu, 28 Jun 2007 19:23:20 +0000

Also Charlie brown is challenging Doolittle to disclose all his earmarks and Doolittle refuses. I never have and I don’t intend to start now,” Doolittle said. “It breaches confidentiality with constituents who make requests.”

By: Buck Fush

Buck Fush — Thu, 28 Jun 2007 19:16:43 +0000

Looks like he might Doo-a-little time in the pokie.

By: BottomBoy

BottomBoy — Thu, 28 Jun 2007 19:00:25 +0000

This thread is just too gay.

By: Mark Foley

Mark Foley — Thu, 28 Jun 2007 18:57:31 +0000

Hey Jeff,

I don’t think cherries make any good tops. If you manage to get your hands on a real cherry, just ask him for some pickle chugging or stay on top yourself.

Just a friendly advice.

-Mark

By: Rusty

Rusty — Thu, 28 Jun 2007 18:52:55 +0000

Deep probes Jeff. Deep probes.

By: Jeff Gannon

Jeff Gannon — Thu, 28 Jun 2007 18:52:02 +0000

Probes? Oh, pretty please – with a cherry on top.

By: Rusty

Rusty — Thu, 28 Jun 2007 18:50:54 +0000

So long Doo. Another for the Grand old Docket!