They are Saudi OIL WHOREBAGS who have known the Bin Ladens and the Saudi TERRORIST FINANCIERS (still funding Al Queda) for YEARS.

Just because Snow said some things against Bush previously, says NOTHING of the FACT that he is a LIAR for the Bush CRIMINALS.

And will BURN IN HELL FOR ETERNITY.

Speaking of SERIOUSLY, please tell me:

WHY did Bush and Cheney REFUSE TO TESTIFY UNDER OATH to the 9/11 Commission??

i.e. SWEAR TO GOD TO TELL THE TRUTH TO THE USA??

Come on, Nazi azzhole-licker, BRING IT ON.

Because ALL of YOUR barbs directed toward ME mean that YOU can’t be taken seriously, especially since you support WAR CRIMINALS.

The REAL WAR CRIMINALS are the Bushes, and they and YOU will burn in hell for ETERNITY.

And Bush and Cheney are COXUCKER punk TRAITORS to the USA..

BURN!
SIZZLE!
FRY!
TOAST!
ROAST!
SINGE!

Have a nice day!!!

See you in hell Nazi azzhole-licker (cause I’LL be THERE),

Mr. Bush
MURDEROUS WAR CRIMINAL
COWARDLY AWOL TRAITOR TO THE USA (TM–BushCrimeCo, Inc.)

NOPE, you’re the Islamo-Stalinist Muslim adorer, perhaps you should spend some quality time with them. Again, you’re the #1 candidate to spend an eternity in hell, why seek to bring others down to your level? You should be on your own, buddy.

“Your attacks on ME are the words of a Nazi azzhole-licker of unamerican TRAITOR coxucker PUNKS like Bush. They mean NOTHING.”

They carry infinite meaning, actually. You’re essentially a bat out of hell, so you don’t expect to be dipped in chocolate on ANY thread – liberal or conservative – do you?

“What DOES mean something is that EVEN IF BUSH AND CHENEY don’t get their trials in THIS LIFETIME, God HEARS their LIES and SEES the EVIL, MURDEROUS ACTS THAT THEY HAVE COMMITTED.”

Communism has probably caused more deaths. Ever speak out against that? Saddam was more of an enemy than our President ever will be. Perhaps you should make a better effort to respect our commander-in-chief.

“Have a NICE ETERNAL DAMNATION, Nazi azzhole-licker of Bush.”

You advocate for terrorist Muslims, yet I am the candidate for hell? Your posts are really easy to skip, by the way, and your propaganda is an easy motivation for the right-wing to write books, all of which end up becoming best-sellers. Let’s see: conservatives write books, they sell extremely well, yet this is supposedly a “progressive” nation. One more rebuttal to THAT false report. Man you people don’t get it. Anyhow, I digress.

“AND Tony Snow is STILL a LIAR, even if he LIES for TRAITORS like Bush and Cheney.”

After you just refuted an extensive archived documentary from your own TP, you can’t be taken seriously. You may have some leeches on your brain.

“And Tony IS going to DIE soon. Just LOOK at him, if you can…”

Well, I see that you need help, but you’re already in hell.

“Oh well, some NEED to be in hell, and they CERTAINLY do…”

Again, why attempt to bring everyone down to your level?

Cook your polls, then. It’s good that you’re all warm and toasty inside, even if that’s based on a false premise.

Stupid hippie.

Re: and classified information being mishandled? do you not see the huge hypocrisy on this made up non-scandal?

Comment by Conservatron — June 26, 2007 @ 1:38 pm

Wiretapping the enemy was reported to the world long before the NYT reported on it, fool. Not a whimper from Bush or the Repubs in Congress. Here:

Go to CNN.com, search their archives for “Patriot Act,” go to page 38 of the results, and read the article dated 10/8/01 entitled “PC World poll highlights privacy concerns.” Monitoring the communications of the terrorists is hardly a national secret. Let me quote from that article which references a PC World poll:

The proposed PATRIOT (Provide Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism) Act would provide investigators with more flexibility and greater access to high-tech tools to pursue wiretaps of mobile phones, interception of e-mail messages, and monitoring of Web surfing and other PC-based communications.

Are you going to be the first to report CNN and the author of this article to the FBI for helping the enemy? No? I’ve tried several times to get your idiot troll friends to do this, but nobody has bothered. You can find the number to your local FBI field office on their web site.

Comment by Conservatron — June 28, 2007 @ 4:56 pm

Fact: In July 2006 it was revealed that the Office of Professional Responsibility in the Justice Department — the office “responsible for investigating allegations of misconduct involving Department attorneys” — repeatedly attempted to investigate whether DOJ lawyers acted improperly concerning their role in the President’s warrantless eavesdropping program, but finally stopped their investigation because the President refused to give them the security clearances they needed to conduct the investigation.

Yet the President had no problem giving clearance to individuals, some who where civilians, when he wanted to find out who had leaked information regarding the warrantless wiretapping program to the public.

Bush has repeatedly claimed that the warrantless wiretapping program is legal. Yet he continues to hide (what is he afraid of?) and block any attempts at oversight. And spare me the argument that Bush made when he said that Congress was advised of the program. I didn’t know that Congress was made up of 8 members.

From recent testimony, it appears that not everyone in the administration was going along with this program. Until recently, Bush would have us believe that there was no disagreement. Had the investigation by the OPR been allowed to proceed, they surely would have found this out. However, up until the Democrats regained oversight power, the rubber-stamp Congress didn’t give a damn what this “president” did, despite members of the Republican party, among them Arlen Specter and Lindsey Graham, announcing that, yes, the warrantless wiretapping program was against the law and called for investigations yet ending up kissing Bush’s ass anyway.

Fact: President Bush says his warrantless wiretapping program, which involves communication in which one end of the call is in a foreign country, is a valid program because the NSA does not have enough time to go to the FISA court for a warrant. Mr. Bush says going to the FISA court would slow down the process of tracking terrorists and that they may get away.

However, Mr. Bush says that for domestic to domestic calls, he still goes to the FISA court.

So in other words, in one situation (domestic-international call), we don’t have time to go to FISA. But in another situation (domestic-domestic call), which could also involve one terrorist talking to another, Bush does go to FISA. Thus in one situation, he is “concerned” about time constraints, and in the other he is not. Bush’s rationale for avoiding the FISA court is blown to hell.

Made up charges? Bah!

Insignificant piece of shit…or 26%er.

Oh well, some NEED to be in hell, and they CERTAINLY do…

Comment by CT V_1

Have a NICE ETERNAL DAMNATION, Nazi azzhole-licker of Bush.

Stupid hippie.

Hey shit for brains. Liberal is good, 26%ers are dumb. Get a clue.

nuff said.

Adverse inference: The President’s original admission of warrantless interrogations/surveillance is valid; and evidence of criminal activity.

Reynolds and NIxon are precedents which prohibit classification of illegal activity behind a claim of privilege or state secrets. Legal counsel like Clements who appear to have been engaged in illegal activity, and not stopping it, could be disbarred for not having resigned. Snow’s denials are fleeting, without merit, and not supported by the Preident’s fatal admissions to the contrary.

I am afraid that I can only conclude that you are the product of your sister, and mother being one in the same person. Being stupid does not make name calling on your part suddenly a brilliant argument.

As to your claim that Clinton did indeed do it too:

1: Irrelevant. My point is that neither the Democrats nor the Republicans should be in power if they are abusing that power or allowing a precedent whereby they can abuse that power.

2: 9 times out of 10, it is simply untrue. The worst the Republicans can honestly say about the guy is that he lied about getting a blowjob. Hardly a stirring indictment of Clinton’s time as president.

It’s not the only thing that’s there, you illiterate fool! TP covered it extensive, and they even provide a link within the article to coverage of further statements.

If you can’t accept that, then you’ve lost all credibility.

TP – do I need to tell you how disappointed I am in you now?! What happened to:

“Snow is lying”?!

Did you get a call from the WH or something?

Geez…How are we going to get anywhere if we’re so freaking wimpy that we can’t even call out a liar?

Not made up. Pretty damn obvious. Bush’s military tribunals were ruled invalid by the American supreme court, that made them illegal. Bush’s wiretaps were done without a warrant (BTB: The required warrant could have been gotten up to 3 days AFTER listening in began, hardly onerous) and were thus illegal.

Further, what happens to a normal personw when they get a subpeona and they choose to ignore it? Yep, that’s a crime too.

Pelosi and the Democrats have AMPLE grounds for impeachment and conviction, the trouble is, they want to do exactly the same things as Bush is doing now. They want their president to have absolute power, and the best way for them to do that is to use Bush to generate a precedent for that power.

By accepting that a unpopular Republican President with under two years left in office, as being above the law, they can use the powers he grabbed when a more popular Democrat takes over. The Republican party is now for all intents and purposes dead, it is identified with corruption, incompetence and stupidity. The first two are a result of K Street and the 6 years the Republicans held all three houses, the last is due to the remaining 30 percenters.

Confronted with the evidence, I hope you now see what delusional piece of dry cow crap that you truly are.

Now you can recognize that my posts on #24 and #26 were clear sarcasm.

Your #1 on that “Top 10″ list of candidates to go to hell, by the way.

Suck an a**, HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!

In 1776 a group of men sat at a table to sign their death warrant. It was the Declaration Of Independence. Treason against England. They did so because the King of England would not listen to the colonies.

WE are the new colonies. The majority of Americans who have spoken.We have listened to the splitting of hairs and legal wragglings of Bush and Cheney and their spokepersons. They seem to forget that there were no splitting of hairs in the Declaration or the Consititution. Yet, they wrap themselves in the cloak of desperate men as Englands wealthy elite did. Splitting Hairs
Cheney and Bush or treasonous to the founding fathers of our country.