Oral sex is more than acceptable; it’s great! and how many guys having a affair have lied about it? The comparisons just don’t compute. The best thing about the Clinton impeachment is that it made it okay to talk openly about oral sex and various forms of foreplay. For this prudish Puritan society, that’s a significant contribution, particularly in this Age of AIDS.

Of course, FOX and CBS are still too embarrassed to hear the word ‘condom’ in an ad, but maybe they’ll grow up by the 22nd century.

Hmmm, I don’t recall the NY Slimes propagandists running out and interviewing lawyers for terrorists about why THEIR clients weren’t permitted to purchase pardons from Clinton.

Comment by CT_V1, Dean of Dissent — July 5, 2007 @ 3:32 pm

Don’t be ridiculous, CT.

Yet Ken Starr used offers of reduced sentences in order to try to obtain cooperation.

One of the 14 died in solitary confinement.

Faced with the circumstances of an investigation into corruption by a special prosecutor, President Clinton could have commuted the sentences or pardoned the guilty, but he didn’t.

Clinton most certainly did not do it too. Any argument to the contrary must address the Whitewater investigation, the convictions, the prison times served by friends and associates of the Clintons.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_McDougal

She did the time, including 7 weeks in solitary confinement.

Clinton did it too?

I don’t think so.

Comment by ValiantVenusGrewFromUranus — July 5, 2007 @ 4:04 pm

…says the generator of contrived terms and talking points, all of which require censorship.

Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much?
Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much?
Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much?
Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much?
Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much?
Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much?
Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much? Project much?

Of the armed forces under Clinton, he said:
Our military is low on parts, pay and morale. If called on by the commander-in-chief today, two entire divisions of the Army would have to report … Not ready for duty, sir. …

This broken military is the one he has used in his GWOT!

Then he said: “I will act on principle. …”

We wonder what principle.

Next he says: “The world needs America’s strength and leadership… We will give our military the means to keep the peace, and we will give it one thing more … a commander-in-chief who respects our men and women in uniform, and a commander-in-chief who earns their respect.

A generation shaped by Vietnam must remember the lessons of Vietnam. When America uses force in the world, the cause must be just, the goal must be clear, and the victory must be overwhelming.”

We’ve learned that lesson allright, right GW?

And finally, he summarizes: “And to lead this nation to a responsibility era, a president himself must be responsible. And so, when I put my hand on the Bible, I will swear to not only uphold the laws of our land, I will swear to uphold the honor and dignity of the office to which I have been elected, so help me God. …

After all of the shouting, and all of the scandal. After all of the bitterness and broken faith. … Our country is ready for high standards and new leaders … An era of tarnished ideals is giving way to a responsibility era …”

Yeah, right.
He ended up lowering the bar, and has accomplished none of these lofty goals. In fact, it would appear that he deliberately worked against them.

Yes, Bill Clinton lowered the moral standards of a nation by receiving, then lying about, oral sex. We have all suffered for that, haven’t we? I know I feel a little naughty after a good BJ.
But look what Mr. Bush has done to the moral fabric of America. His message of high moral standards, like with so many politicians, is just for public consumption and lacks any true moral substance.
His favorite philosopher is Jesus!
How he tries to emulate him by pitying and aiding the poor.
Like poor Scooter. Hasn’t he suffered enough.
He paid his $250 thousand dollar fine today. So all is well.
Scooter had over $5 million donated to his defense fund.
How ill he manage?

Obstruction of Justice…it pays better than assistant to the Vice President!

Call the system you wish to fight what it is: Theocracy.

I mean, why are you righties so afraid of the accurate name of the form of government championed by the likes of Osama Bin Laden?

That’s a contrived term, and a b*llsh*t term to cover up the danger of religio-fascism like yours. Pure projection, you nazi-b!tch!

You’ve confused NATIONALISM with PATRIOTISM, you inbred fat*ss Nazi-b!tch!

It is a duty, CT.

A National duty of true patriots like you and me.

So again you are making assumptions, there is no evidence that that outing of Plame has resulted in the death of any agents.

That’s an idiotic argument…equivalent to me pleading innocent of drunk driving in a court of law on the grounds that I didn’t actually kill anybody…or at least the prosecution couldn’t prove I did.

You’re going to have to do a lot better than that.

Islamo-Stalinism is a serious problem throughout the world, it’s the grapple of our time and a serious threat. It’s a great priority to combat.

I don’t take one’s disagreement with me as notice that “I’m not contributing anything,” as that shouldn’t be the signal.

I think you’re getting too defensive.

Comment by wow! — July 5, 2007 @ 1:55 pm

Your attempt at equivocation has failed miserably.