On Rush Limbaugh’s radio show Tuesday, a 13 year old caller named Patrick complained that he was forced to read “liberal magazines like Time and Newsweek” in school which explained the globe was getting warmer. The caller said he was skeptical of the science because “my parents have always been skeptical of it.” Limbaugh then offered the following encouragement to the caller:
RUSH: Patrick, this will be a good lesson. There are liberals everywhere. You may think that just because your town is conservative — there are liberals. They’re hiding in the shadows, and they are lurking there, and they’re around and the odds are that many of them are in the school system. You’ll probably at some point probably have to watch [Al Gore’s movie], unless your parents and other parents find out about it and demand, “If you’re going to show this movie, you better show the Great Global Warming Swindle and put the other side to our kids out there.” Well, congratulations. I’m glad you called and told us this. This is the kind of thing that gives us all encouragement for the future. Here you are at 13, already aware of when you’re watching propaganda. That’s great.
I wonder how much they paid the kid to say that..?
July 5th, 2007 at 3:54 pm“Here you are at 13, already aware of when you’re watching propaganda. That’s great.”
But unaware that he’s listening to it. That’s great…
July 5th, 2007 at 3:55 pmI don’t think they had to pay him. Brought up in a right-wing home … but I can’t believe people are still skeptical. And talking about propaganda! What about the right-wing propaganda. Idiot.
July 5th, 2007 at 3:55 pmTime?
July 5th, 2007 at 3:56 pmNewsweek?
Liberal propaganda?
Ah ha
Ah ha ha
Ah ha ha ha
Ah ha ha ha ha
Ah ha ha ha ha ha
Ah ha ha ha ha ha ha
There is a special place in Hell for these bastards and sadly it will be standing room only.
July 5th, 2007 at 3:57 pmDon’t worry young man. A well rounded education is not necessary for you. It will only cause you to think for yourself which may end up being detrimental to my stock options down the road. Drop out now and join the fight against public education.
July 5th, 2007 at 3:58 pmI think the average age of a Limbaugh listener is declining, what is the average now, about 19?
July 5th, 2007 at 3:58 pmThe whole idea that global warming ins liberal propaganda doesn’t make sense. How do liberals benefit from the belief that the world is warming???
July 5th, 2007 at 3:58 pmDid anyone see JESUS CAMP?
There is a scene where the mother is teaching her kid how foolish global warming is. Talked to her kid, saying something like “The temperature has risen only about a degree - doesn’t that seem like enough to mean it will do any damage?” The kid said “No” and then they both smiled contently.
July 5th, 2007 at 3:58 pmOh please. “The Great Global Warming Swindle”? Still???
Check here for a comprehensive listing of the reasons you need not waste 75 minutes of your time watching this dreck.
July 5th, 2007 at 3:59 pm#2. My thoughts as well.
July 5th, 2007 at 3:59 pmWasn’t Time the one that named Bush man of the year?
Liberal huh?
Anyway, it is nice to know that in the great world of political movements we are basically Batman.
July 5th, 2007 at 3:59 pmDamn! That reminds me, I’ve been shirking my lurking duties lately! I better go find some bushes and shadows to tempt children with my liberal propaganda. “Pssst! Hey kid! Want some Mother Jones?”
July 5th, 2007 at 3:59 pm#7
I think the average age of a Limbaugh listener is declining, what is the average now, about 19?
Comment by Raven — July 5, 2007 @ 3:58 pm
I think 19 actually refers to the IQ of the average Limpball listener.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:00 pmToo funny. One only wishes there was an alternate universe we could send Rush to where his fantasy was really true: liberals outing and persecuting conservatives like the Fat Man himself. You know, kids snitching on their parents who then get hauled off the gulag. Oh, sadly that has happened too many times in history. I wonder if Rush knows?
It would be one thing if Rush believed his own blather. But I suspect it’s an act, you know, a day job to pay for his pills and sex trips to the Carribean.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:00 pmYeah that’s right Rush, equate liberals with slimy low life’s that lurk around in the shadows like pedophiles.
He is right about one thing, there are liberals everywhere.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:00 pmDo we have claws too?
These sound like the same things they said about witches. And then the commies, and then the japanese, and then the commies again, the blacks, the mexicans, the arabs…
I wonder if they’re just going to eventually come out and say ‘If you’re not this hair color, this skin color, and this religion, with these particular beliefs (at least practiced unto others…), we hate you.
I’m 17, I encouraged the use of An Inconvenient Truth in my high school. I encouraged my science teacher to talk about that issue. I talked with my fellow students, and I ensured they all knew a simple fact: If someone’s telling you something, and they don’t cite a source, you need to check up on it. I occasionally get checked-up on too, and they laugh in my face on it, because I encouraged them to do that.
I think Rage Against the Machine put it rightly: “We gotta kick ‘em out.” And we should start with this generation, and it should be preached thereafter.
-Xbot
July 5th, 2007 at 4:00 pmThe caller said he was skeptical of the science because “my parents have always been skeptical of it.”
A typical dittohead. Doesn’t think for himself. No wonder Rush took the call.
As for liberals hiding in the shadows…Not anymore:
Another Runaway Quarter For MSNBC And Olbermann.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:00 pm“MSNBC’s growth is powered by a surging Countdown with Keith Olbermann. The most recent quarter continues a pattern of Countdown battering away at The Factor’s lead, just as it has been doing for the past year.”
“If you’re going to show this movie, you better show the Great Global Warming Swindle and put the other side to our kids out there.â€
Hmm. The other side. Just like the fairness doctrine does for talk radio.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:01 pmTime and Newsweek are liberal huh? LOL.
Time and Newsweek are owned by giant corporations. And who owns giant corporations? Wild-eyed, shaggy, dope-smoking liberals? LOL.
Don’t make me laugh. They just hired Bill Kristol for Crissakes.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:01 pmThat poor dumb kid hasn’t got a chance.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:01 pmNow I’m scared. Rush told me that there are lots of liberals just lurking out there. I look behind bushes as I walk past them. I don’t want some liberal jump out and start to educate me. Lord please save me!!
July 5th, 2007 at 4:02 pmLiberals?
July 5th, 2007 at 4:02 pmYes, Rush, we’re around every corner, in every car,
at every McDonalds pickup window,
at the end of every Wal-Mart checkout lane…
We’re everywhere, on your street, in your basement, and behind your closet door.
We’re even under your bed at night…..
(BOO)
#9 Did anyone see JESUS CAMP?
Comment by Anonymous By Choice — July 5, 2007 @ 3:58 pm
What an absolutely frightening movie and a testament to how malleable young minds are. Brainwashing is real and it’s happening right now in an Evangelical MegaChurch near you.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:03 pmDigDug
What you have to understand is:
You know how you get some liberals who think Israel is behind everything?
Well, that is the entire Conservative movement, except instead of Isreal, read “Scientist.”
July 5th, 2007 at 4:03 pmMusta been Patrick1, calling to offer his worship to the drug addict.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:04 pm#9 Did anyone see JESUS CAMP?
Comment by Anonymous By Choice — July 5, 2007 @ 3:58 pm
What an absolutely frightening movie and a testament to how malleable young minds are. Brainwashing is real and it’s happening right now in an Evangelical MegaChurch near you.
Comment by Lupeyg2 — July 5, 2007 @ 4:03 pm
Absolutely horrifying film. Child abuse at it’s most insidious.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:05 pmDamn liberals! Always forcing kids to read. Whats next? Forcing this kid to learn science?
July 5th, 2007 at 4:05 pmhmmm. Here come some young kid. Let’s jump out and scare the bejeezus out of him.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:06 pmRush is still illegally using drugs. If one can not hear/see this, then one is obviously drinking too much kool aid.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:07 pmOr could it be, the 20% pro bush hate America crowd are those indulging in the pharmaceuticals and are too drugged, as limp…, to see reality.
Boogie boogie boogie!
July 5th, 2007 at 4:07 pmMaybe Patrick was a Republican Senator pretending to be 13…
Thank you Xbot… you’ve got my support for kicking them out and it just may have to be your generation. I’m counting on you.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:08 pmWhat next? Them liberuls will be tellin our yungsters that cavemen didn’t eat dinosaurs?
July 5th, 2007 at 4:08 pmWhat then, the Flintstones are just a cartoon? Oh the shame!
Rush should have told this kid that Democrats/liberals are better people than republican/conservatives and that the kid should support liberals or he is going straight to hell.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:08 pm#27 Child abuse at it’s most insidious.
Comment by Zooey — July 5, 2007 @ 4:05 pm
Without a doubt that is child abuse. Implanting irrational fears into the heads of children which then causes obvious severe emotional distress is worse than some of the things my wife (social worker) takes kids out of homes for.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:09 pmThere are liberals everywhere. You may think that just because your town is conservative — there are liberals. They’re hiding in the shadows, and they are lurking there, and they’re around and the odds are that many of them are in the school system.
Lifted by paraphrase from “The Eternal Jew”….
July 5th, 2007 at 4:10 pmHey, like, ya know what?
July 5th, 2007 at 4:11 pmJust for making a phone call, and asking this question they gave me to ask, they gave me this really cool X-box thingy, with some really cool games, like “End of the Universe”, and “Big Deal Drugrunners”,
and this really weird one called “King Karls Keep” that I’m supposed to listen to at night while I sleep.
I had to sign all these papers, but they wouldn’t let me have any of them…. donch’a think that’s weird?
They were about servitude or something like that, you know what I mean?
I mean, what does that mean?
Ya know what I mean?
It’s just a good thing that the kids’ parents are Dittoheads or he’d be turning them in to the HUAC. Limbaugh sounds like one of those Red Scare “news” films from the 50s. What a jerk.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:11 pmSo the consensus judgment is that the caller was patrick? I’m thinking maybe it was m12, and he exaggerated his age to sound more mature.
Either way, I wouldn’t completely give up on this kid. if he’s that deeplyindoctrinated at 13, it’s possible that he’ll rebel at 16 and become a wild-eyed, dirty f*cking hippie.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:12 pmAnd I bet Junior believes that Adam and Eve rode dinosaurs.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:13 pmCalling in the ALL shoes…………
ANY 2008 RED seats go after them, hunt them down.
All finger lap top pickers…..
start infecting red state newpapers, start infecting red thread boards with financial charts, (post below under car pool for troops)
call red congressmen that are UP for re-election in 2008. Target those Republican Troop Murderers for their seat at the 2008 dinner table.
List out the murders that they have done since the REPUBLICANS stopped the withdrawal of our troops.
They are dirty rats, that lie, cheat and kill the american middle class families. The republicans have more blood on their hands than convicts living in prison, including sleeezeeeee LIBBY.
Go start the posts on any RED main boards ……………..
elk
July 5th, 2007 at 4:13 pm13 is actually an appropriate age for Limbaugh listerners. It’s when kids are just beginning to think critically and (therefore?) tend to believe they know everything. I used to believe 13 was GWB’s intellectual/emotional age; then a psychiatrist told me he thought GWB’s development ended around 9.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:15 pmRush Limbaugh. Bedwetting and obese drug addict and childless, thrice divorced, patron of underage sex meccas.
Yep, the perfect voice for the Bush/Coulter Republican Party.
-GSD
July 5th, 2007 at 4:15 pm“You’ll probably at some point probably have to watch [Al Gore’s movie], unless your parents and other parents find out about it and demand, “If you’re going to show this movie, you better show the Great Global Warming Swindle and put the other side to our kids out there.—
that is the typical bs you hear from the right wing, and yet that is exactly what most ‘news’ shows do. They put on the facts, and then have a blow hard right wing nut job spew ten time more lies and inacuracies. Thats the ‘other’ side.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:15 pm“…it’s possible that he’ll rebel at 16 and become a wild-eyed, dirty f*cking hippie.”
Comment by spit take
I’m here to testify: It’s been known to happen. LOL
July 5th, 2007 at 4:16 pm#9 Did anyone see JESUS CAMP?
Comment by Anonymous By Choice — July 5, 2007 @ 3:58 pm
What an absolutely frightening movie and a testament to how malleable young minds are. Brainwashing is real and it’s happening right now in an Evangelical MegaChurch near you.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:17 pmComment by Lupeyg2
——————————————————
This is nothing compared to the Palenstinian kiddy camps with suicide belts, Allah Akbar, death to Jews etc……
“I wonder how much they paid the kid to say that..?
Comment by JG — July 5, 2007″
Why? Bacause he doesn’t agree with your garbage science?
July 5th, 2007 at 4:19 pmAll I can say is that I hope these liberal hatin’ conservatives find themselves down and out in the gutter. When they need some one to give them a helping hand, they’ll meet one of their heroic, self-centered conservatives who will admonish them to get a job and pull themselves up by their bootstraps.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:20 pm#46 This is nothing compared to the Palenstinian kiddy camps with suicide belts, Allah Akbar, death to Jews etc……
Comment by Flaco — July 5, 2007 @ 4:17 pm
So are you justifying the brainwashing? Wouldn’t it make more sense to try and prevent those kids from adhering to extremism rather than build up your own counter-extremism and then war it out?
Is this a new take on an old talking point - “The Palestinians did it too”?
July 5th, 2007 at 4:20 pm“I can’t believe people are still skeptical.
Comment by RushHater — July 5, 2007″
And you can explain to us why we shouldn’t be skeptical?
July 5th, 2007 at 4:21 pmHere you are at 13, already aware of when you’re watching propaganda. That’s great.
And your Rush Limbaugh armband and brown shirt are on their way to you now…
July 5th, 2007 at 4:21 pm#42 penalcolony
July 5th, 2007 at 4:21 pmThat’s the age when lil W was shoving lit firecrackers up frog’s asses, makes sense when you look at the mess in Iraq.
Hey, michael has joined us and he’s brought all of his counterarguments with him….
July 5th, 2007 at 4:22 pm“There is a special place in Hell for these bastards and sadly it will be standing room only.
Comment by Maddie — July 5, 2007″
Oh please. Aren’t you capable of saying anything a little more intelligent than that?
July 5th, 2007 at 4:22 pmwhatever it is, I’m against it.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:23 pm“I think the average age of a Limbaugh listener is declining, what is the average now, about 19?
Comment by Raven — July 5, 2007″
That’s a good thing because as they get older they will have the bases for making intelligent decisions!
July 5th, 2007 at 4:24 pmWhy? Bacause he doesn’t agree with your garbage science?
Comment by michael — July 5, 2007 @ 4:19 pm
What’s “garbage science” about it? Just because you don’t agree with it?
July 5th, 2007 at 4:24 pmWhy? Bacause he doesn’t agree with your garbage science?
And you can explain to us why we shouldn’t be skeptical?
Oh please. Aren’t you capable of saying anything a little more intelligent than that?
Comments by michael
In 3 posts, you’ve managed to add nothing to your side of the debate (and I’m humoring you by actually calling it a debate…since a debate implies that there is credibility to both sides of the argument).
July 5th, 2007 at 4:25 pmOh please. Aren’t you capable of saying anything a little more intelligent than that?
Comment by michael — July 5, 2007 @ 4:22 pm
Why do you assume that Maddie is not capable of saying anything more intelligent than that?
July 5th, 2007 at 4:25 pmCongratulations Patrick! At 13 years old you are all ready as big a fool as your parents. Takes most folks a lot longer than 13 years to be totally brainwashed but you were easy. Who ever said there was no fool like an old fool when here we have a nice young fool all set to take his place in the lineup of morons, flatearthers and conservative pinheads. So sad to think that some poor girl will someday marry this waste of DNA and spawn.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:26 pmYeah, you got to watch out for us liberals. We’ll stuck your blood and make your kids gay and learn tolerance. Bwahahahahahahahaha!
/sarcasm
July 5th, 2007 at 4:27 pmThat’s a good thing because as they get older they will have the bases for making intelligent decisions!
Comment by michael — July 5, 2007 @ 4:24 pm
Oh, please. What makes you figure that they will be “intelligent” decisions?
July 5th, 2007 at 4:27 pmWhy? Bacause he doesn’t agree with your garbage science?
And you can explain to us why we shouldn’t be skeptical?
Oh please. Aren’t you capable of saying anything a little more intelligent than that?
Comments by michael
In 3 posts, you’ve managed to add nothing to your side of the debate (and I’m humoring you by actually calling it a debate…since a debate implies that there is credibility to both sides of the argument).
Comment by Lupeyg2 — July 5, 2007 @ 4:25 pm
Looks like mikey has had his three questions for this thread - everyone gets to cross the bridge now and pay no more attention to him.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:27 pmLurking liberals? Wait, nobody told me we were supposed to lurk. Did I miss a meeting? I was busy infiltrating - damn it’s hard to keep up with the liberal conspiricy!
July 5th, 2007 at 4:28 pmLooks like mikey has had his three questions for this thread - everyone gets to cross the bridge now and pay no more attention to him.
Comment by TerrytheTurtle — July 5, 2007 @ 4:27 pm
Dammit! That was good.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:28 pm#64 Comment by TerrytheTurtle — July 5, 2007 @ 4:27 pm
You can always use his playbook and just keep questioning his questions to an asinine degree.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:29 pmRush added, “Hey, kid. Let me know if you need any illegal prescription drugs. I can take care of you.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:29 pm#65: Yes. “Lurk” is the new directive from those who set the liberal agenda. By the way, according to the agenda, we’ve got a 15 minute break coming up at 3:30.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:30 pmShortly afterwords Rush asked his staff to supply the contact information on the boy…Rush wants to keep “helping”.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:30 pmQuit talking about Al Gore III
July 5th, 2007 at 4:31 pm“That’s a good thing because as they get older they will have the bases for making intelligent decisions!”
Comment by michael
Well, that is the Conflict Capitalists dream,
to have the bases, right? (pardon the pun)
Or did you mean basis?
(Did you get a late start on your personal programming, or are you just a “slow learner”?)
July 5th, 2007 at 4:32 pm“Musta been Patrick1
Comment by RUCerious — July 5, 2007″
i wouldn’t doubt that for a minute.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:33 pmThat’s a good thing because as they get older they will have the bases for making intelligent decisions!
Comment by michael —
Jeez you are dumb. What “bases” will they have, the ones in Iraq?
All your base are belong to us Micheal.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:33 pmThis is nothing compared to the Palenstinian kiddy camps with suicide belts, Allah Akbar, death to Jews etc……
Comment by Flaco — July 5, 2007 @ 4:17 pm
Where are these camps, exactly? What part of “Palenstine?” I’m always hearing about these indoctrination training camps for “Palenstinian” youth, yet I’ve yet to see any proof that they actually exist. At least, proof that’s not supplied by MEMRI and AIPAC.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:33 pmThis is the typical type of propaganda that we can expect from the right wing and Republican elite. For years they have been painting all Democrats and liberals as dangerous, subhuman enemies of the state. We can laugh all that we want at how stupid these characterizations are. We can dismiss the tactic as inappropriate. We can swear that we will not adopt such personal, nonsubstantive arguments. However, our country elect Bush and re-elected him to a second term; lived under an all Republican controlled government until the 2006 election and we have watched our Supreme Court turned into a throw back of the late 1800’s. Take it seriously and develop a way to counter the propaganda. We may very well carry the presidency but we will live with the courts and nonpartisan career civil servants chosen by Bush for many years. We were lucky that a majority seems to be waking up. We may not be that lucky the next time.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:33 pmWaaaauuuuugggghhhh! Liberals! Liberals! They’re Everywhere! Night of the Living Liberals! Board up your windows and doors! They’ll try and make you think and Not Obey! Hear only the soothing words of the Great Deciderer and he will deliver you from the evil Liberals!
July 5th, 2007 at 4:34 pmThey should just come right out and say it:
” the Truth is Liberal Propaganda! Any institution that tries to give you that damn Truth is a dirty Liberal conspiracy! The world is flat! All people came from White Folks Adam and Eve! The Universe is ours to do with as we please! Everything else is Liberal Propaganda designed to…. to what?…. what exactly is the Liberal Propaganda designed to do? Oh Yeah! Embolden the terrorists! Global Warming Emboldens the Terrorists!”
I just saw some dimwit on Faux Noise saying that “National Healthcare would allow terrorists into the country.
How can you bring yourself to say something some so stupid?
July 5th, 2007 at 4:35 pm“That’s a good thing because as they get older they will have the bases for making intelligent decisions!”
Comment by michael
By listening to the propaganda being spoonfed to them? Judging by your own spelling if you’re defending this sheepification I weep for our youth (it’s basis with an I by the way)!
July 5th, 2007 at 4:35 pmI am so happy for the Jungsturm Rush Limpbaughs!
July 5th, 2007 at 4:35 pmThat’s a good thing because as they get older they will have the bases for making intelligent decisions!
Comment by michael — July 5, 2007 @ 4:24 pm
Oh, please. What makes you figure that they will be “intelligent†decisions?
Comment by spit take — July 5, 2007 @ 4:27 pm
When can one comment on intelligence when he doesn’t know the difference between bases and basics.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:36 pmYou can always use his playbook and just keep questioning his questions to an asinine degree.
Comment by Lupeyg2 — July 5, 2007 @ 4:29 pm
True, but I already have a five-year-old at home.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:36 pmNo wonder so many of his listeners have “minds full of mush”.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:36 pmOH MY GOD! there’s a liberal in my house!!!!
eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
oh wait, that’s just me.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:36 pm“However, our country elect Bush and re-elected him to a second term”
That defends on your definition of ‘elect’; personally I believe Bush was not ‘elected’ either time…
July 5th, 2007 at 4:37 pmSeems like this 13 yr old kid is wise beyond his years. Kudos to his parents for their involvement in his education.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:37 pmI like lurking in leafy, limber larches.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:38 pmDon’t waste your time on this article; send to the FCC as offensive material. They have to put it in their records.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:38 pmThe majority of America did NOT elect herr dubyah in 2000.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:39 pmAt least, proof that’s not supplied by MEMRI…
Comment by toasterhead
——————————————
Dude you are not serious. You mean CAIR
July 5th, 2007 at 4:40 pm….the limberness lends lots of leverage when I leap.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:41 pmhey, don’t worry about flaky, the skinny troll. he obviously doesn’t realize the treasure trove of comparing the misdeeds of politicians’ children he’s just opened up (barb and jenna bush).
certainly there isn’t anyone on the right that has children that have gotten in trouble with the law (noelle bush).
certainly flaky realizes that it would be completely hypocritical to attack al gore because of his son’s unwise actions. because certainly it’s in bad taste to criticize the bushes for their children’s mistakes…
i wonder what the “liberal media” will do?
July 5th, 2007 at 4:41 pmI wish liberals actually did more lurking in the shadows — where I live they won’t shut up!
July 5th, 2007 at 4:42 pmThe majority of America did NOT elect herr dubyah in 2000.
Comment by Dr. Matt — July 5, 2007 @ 4:39 pm
Yeah but I voted twice and my second one counted lots.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:44 pmThey kill Mickey Mouse….
http://www.memritv.org/Transcript.asp?P1=1497
July 5th, 2007 at 4:44 pmTo say that liberals are lurking in the corners trying to get you is a bit extreme. For the most part they believe that they are doing the right thing and have good intentions. Unfortunately, it is their good intentions that end up being the opposite for our country which is what makes them dangerous.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:45 pmhttp://www.memritv.org/
this stuff is lovely
July 5th, 2007 at 4:46 pmThey kill Mickey Mouse….
Comment by Flaco
I hate to do this to you, limpdick, but Mickey Mouse ain’t real.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:46 pmRush is hearing all those stories about the younger generation of Muslims being indoctrinated to hate America, so he’s doing his part to generate a new breed of young Republican haters here at home.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:46 pmComment by lonesomerobot — July 5, 2007 @ 4:41 pm
What about Neil ‘love me long time’ Bush?
July 5th, 2007 at 4:48 pmUnfortunately, it is their good intentions that end up being the opposite for our country which is what makes them dangerous.
Comment by wow!
Wow. What a doofus.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:49 pmComment by Cynicon Implant
Are they openly lurking?
July 5th, 2007 at 4:49 pmThat could then be considered loitering….
Does that make you nervous?
Rush is hearing all those stories about the younger generation of Muslims being indoctrinated to hate America, so he’s doing his part to generate a new breed of young Republican haters here at home.
Comment by Toss these losers — July 5, 2007 @ 4:46 pm
Typical Liberal…..are you this blind? do you not see the left wing hate on this site against conservatives? against Republicans? against Limbaugh?
sad, sad…once again Liberals show their great hypocrisy.
TP Liberals thrive spewing out hate against anyone that is not a Libtard like them.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:50 pmOkay, I have not the time, the patience, nor the stomach to listen to this particular link, but I do have one question…
July 5th, 2007 at 4:50 pmdid Rush end the segment by asking this 13 year old boy a series of questions:
” Do you have any plans this weekend? Have you ever visited a third world country like the Dominican Republic? Do you like movies about gladiators? Have you ever seen a blue little pill, and it’s magical results? Do your parents have any controlled substances for pain at home? Have you ever been in a Turkish prison? You ever seen a grown man naked?”
I will leave the lurking in the shadows for young boys to the likes of Mark Foley.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:51 pm“For the most part they believe that they are doing the right thing and have good intentions. Unfortunately, it is their good intentions that end up being the opposite for our country which is what makes them dangerous.
Comment by wow! — July 5, 2007 @ 4:45 pm”
Actually, you must be talking about Republicans.
We are LESS safer now, then we were 7 years ago.
We are IN DEBT more now, then we were 7 years ago.
We are MORE hated now, then we were 7 years ago.
We have DESTROYED the Constitution, in onlly 7 years under the Republicans…..
The Republicans are the ones that have the opposite effect on our country.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:51 pmThey kill Mickey Mouse….
http://www.memritv.org/Transcript.asp?P1=1497
Comment by Flaco — July 5, 2007 @ 4:44 pm
Yes they did.
Mickey Mouse
July 5th, 2007 at 4:51 pm***R.I.P***
___†___
http://www.memritv.org/
this stuff is lovely
Comment by Flaco — July 5, 2007 @ 4:46 pm
Lovely indeed! I love how they translated “btkhoona al-yehood” as “we will annihilate the Jews.” It’s only a teensy smidge different from the more accurate translation “the Jews will shoot us.”
July 5th, 2007 at 4:52 pmwhat, terry? you mean neil bush?
from what i gather, he’s supposed to get whatever he wants. it’s a bush thing. no crime here. move along.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:52 pmRush added, “Hey, kid. Let me know if you need any illegal prescription drugs. I can take care of you.
Comment by Bush is Corrupt — July 5, 2007 @ 4:29 pm
Yes, he gave him directiosn to Al Gore’s son’s house.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:52 pmBOO!
July 5th, 2007 at 4:53 pmI wish liberals actually did more lurking in the shadows — where I live they won’t shut up!
Comment by Cynicon Implant — July 5, 2007 @ 4:42 pm
So you then come here - a liberal blog - to escape it? Huh?
Oh, and P.S., check out the First Amendment…
July 5th, 2007 at 4:53 pmWow. What a doofus.
Comment by Zooey
I am so hurt.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:54 pmLumNuts, you have drugs? What a person to look up to, sad sad. Even if his parent were on the left or right side ,would let your child listen to someone like Lumnuts, these must be some kind of parents.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:54 pmare you sure it wasn’t jeb bush’s daughter’s house, conservatron?
July 5th, 2007 at 4:55 pm“For the most part they believe that they are doing the right thing and have good intentions. Unfortunately, it is their good intentions that end up being the opposite for our country which is what makes them dangerous.
Comment by wow! — July 5, 2007 @ 4:45 pmâ€
Actually, you must be talking about Republicans.
We are LESS safer now, then we were 7 years ago.
We are IN DEBT more now, then we were 7 years ago.
We are MORE hated now, then we were 7 years ago.
We have DESTROYED the Constitution, in onlly 7 years under the Republicans…..
The Republicans are the ones that have the opposite effect on our country.
Comment by RemoveBush — July 5, 2007 @ 4:51 pm
yea, we were really safe under President Clinton when….
1993 First WTC bombing which was ment to bring down the tower.
1996 Attack on American base in Sauid Arabia by Al Qaeda
1998 American Embassies in Africa are blow up and destroyed by Al Qaeda
2000 USS Cole attacked 17 naval personell die, thanks to who? Al Qaeda
1996 Bin Laden declares war on the USA and calls the USA under President Clinton….a paper tiger.
yeah right we were safer under a Democratic President. What you smoking boy, pass it around, don’t be selfish, we all want to live in la la la land with you. moron.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:55 pmThat kid better drop out of school soon, otherwise the liberals might get to him.
That way he can grow up with all the skills necessary to work at McDonalds. No liberals there right? Hopefully the jobs there won’t be outsourced at that point.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:58 pmComment by Conservatron
Who said: “We do not negotiate with terrorists?”
“Catsup is a vegetable?”
July 5th, 2007 at 4:58 pmI just hope that kid stays out of groping distance.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:58 pmWhenever Patrick1nut posts here from now on, and when I actually read is inane comments, I will automatically imagine hearing this whiny, prepubescent, nerdy ditto head stating:
that he was skeptical of the science because “my parents have always been skeptical of it.â€
*snort!*
July 5th, 2007 at 4:59 pmOf course the kid was a child actor paid to spout such nonsense. Just like that black, closet-case Armstrong Williams was paid by the Whitehouse. Gay gay hustler has an easier time getting in the whitehouse, than getting on Lush’s talk show.
Remeber that Lush went to P.R. with oxy and viagra to have “bible meatings” with kids.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:59 pm“Actually, you must be talking about Republicans.”
“We are LESS safer now, then we were 7 years ago-” I disagree we were never safe before when the plans for 9/11 were being made. We now have more security and better intel to stop future attacks.
“We are IN DEBT more now, then we were 7 years ago.”-I agree
“We are MORE hated now, then we were 7 years ago.”-Clearly we were hated 7 years ago or 9/11 never would have happened. Unfortunately protecting ourselves has cast us in a poor light among other countries.
“We have DESTROYED the Constitution, in onlly 7 years under the Republicans…..”-I disagree the constitution is still in tact. I assume you are referring to wiretapping and intense interrogation. Unfortunately it takes extreme measures to protect our country. Lincoln and FDR understood this, which is why today’s liberal have good intentions but are very dangerous.
Comment by RemoveBush
July 5th, 2007 at 4:59 pmFrom 1994 - 2000, Clinton had a CONSERVATIVE Congress, who wouldn’t let him do anything about Osama…
“GOP Congress blocked Clinton push for anti-terror legislation
by John Aravosis (DC) · 9/04/2006 11:10:00 AM ET
Discuss this post here: Comments (131) · digg it · reddit · FARK · · Link
CNN, July 30, 1996
Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, emerged from the meeting and said, “These are very controversial provisions that the [Clinton] White House wants. Some they’re not going to get.” ….[Hatch] also said he had some problems with the president’s proposals to expand wiretapping.
So Bill Clinton, rather than just breaking the law as Bush did (then again, perhaps this is why Bush broke the law - he knew from history that the Republicans controlling the congress would oppose his efforts to expand wiretapping), decided to go to the Republican congress in 1996 and ask them for increased authority to do more eavesdropping in order to stop the terrorists - stop September 11. Senior Republican Senator Orrin Hatch, one of the GOP’s top picks for the Supreme Court and a GOP committee chair, objected.
The Republicans stopped President Clinton from getting all the tools he needed to stop the next September 11 - well, no, actually they opposed giving President Clinton all the tools he needed to stop the actual September 11. Could September 11 have been stopped if the GOP had given President Clinton the tools he requested to stop Osama and Mohammad Atta from killing 3,000 people in New York, Pennsylvania and Washington?”
http://www.americablog.com/ 2006/ 09/ gop-congress-blocked-clinton-push-for.html
July 5th, 2007 at 5:00 pmResponse to #116:
Here’s what a real President did against terrorism:
# PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON developed the nation’s first anti-terrorism policy, and appointed first national coordinator of anti-terrorist efforts.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:00 pm# Bill Clinton stopped cold the Al Qaeda millennium hijacking and bombing plots.
# Bill Clinton stopped cold a planned attack to kill the Pope.
# Bill Clinton stopped cold a planned attack to blow up 12 U.S. jetliners simultaneously.
# Bill Clinton stopped cold a planned attack to blow up UN Headquarters.
# Bill Clinton stopped cold a planned attack to blow up FBI Headquarters.
# Bill Clinton stopped cold a planned attack to blow up the Israeli Embassy in Washington.
# Bill Clinton stopped cold a planned attack to blow up Boston airport.
# Bill Clinton stopped cold a planned attack to blow up Lincoln and Holland Tunnels in NY.
# Bill Clinton stopped cold a planned attack to blow up the George Washington Bridge.
# Bill Clinton stopped cold a planned attack to blow up the US Embassy in Albania.
# Bill Clinton tried to kill Osama bin Laden and disrupt Al Qaeda through preemptive strikes (efforts denounced by the G.O.P.).
# Bill Clinton brought perpetrators of first World Trade Center bombing and CIA killings to justice.
# Bill Clinton did not blame the Bush I administration for first World Trade Center bombing even though it occurred 38 days after Bush left office. Instead, worked hard, even obsessively — and successfully — to stop future terrorist attacks.
# Bill Clinton named the Hart-Rudman commission to report on nature of terrorist threats and major steps to be taken to combat terrorism.
# Bill Clinton sent legislation to Congress to tighten airport security. (Remember, this is before 911) The legislation was defeated by the Republicans because of opposition from the airlines.
# Bill Clinton sent legislation to Congress to allow for better tracking of terrorist funding. It was defeated by Republicans in the Senate because of opposition from banking interests.
# Bill Clinton sent legislation to Congress to add tagents to explosives, to allow for better tracking of explosives used by terrorists. It was defeated by the Republicans because of opposition from the NRA.
# Bill Clinton increased the military budget by an average of 14 per cent, reversing the trend under Bush I.
# Bill Clinton tripled the budget of the FBI for counterterrorism and doubled overall funding for counterterrorism.
# Bill Clinton detected and destroyed cells of Al Qaeda in over 20 countries.
# Bill Clinton created national stockpile of drugs and vaccines including 40 million doses of smallpox vaccine.
# Of Clinton’s efforts says Robert Oakley, Reagan Ambassador for Counterterrorism: “Overall, I give them very high marks” and “The only major criticism I have is the obsession with Osama”.
# Paul Bremer, current Civilian Administrator of Iraq disagrees slightly with Robert Oakley as he believed the Bill Clinton Administration had “correctly focused on bin Laden.
# Barton Gellman in the Washington Post put it best, “By any measure available, Bill Clinton left office having given greater priority to terrorism than any president before him” and was the “first administration to undertake a systematic anti-terrorist effort”.
President Clinton urged Congress Tuesday to act swiftly in developing anti-terrorism legislation before its August recess.
“We need to keep this country together right now. We need to focus on this terrorism issue,” Clinton said during a White House news conference.
But while the president pushed for quick legislation, Republican lawmakers hardened their stance against some of the proposed anti-terrorism measures.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:01 pmThere’s even an audio clip of President Clinton practically begging the Republicans to give him the tools he needed to stop Osama and the terrorists. Trent Lott said no. Orrin Hatch said no. Do these men really deserve to run the Congress during a time of war?
Lush WOOD make a good repug page leader.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:02 pm“yea, we were really safe under President Clinton when….
1993 First WTC bombing which was ment to bring down the tower.”
Really????? So then the informant for the FBI is just a silly little fool and all of those tapes he made of the FBI telling him how to do it and providing him with the material is just an imagination???? It is NOW public record….. Try doing some danm reading to learn the truth…..
“1996 Attack on American base in Sauid Arabia by Al Qaeda”
Yet, your strong president removed our troops from SA per the request of OBL……
“1998 American Embassies in Africa are blow up and destroyed by Al Qaeda”
Nothing like the bombings and killings going on now!!!! I guess in your crazy mind, the more people that die the better the situation. IDIOT!
“2000 USS Cole attacked 17 naval personell die, thanks to who? Al Qaeda”
Yep, and Bush did NOTHING ABOUT IT! Clinton wanted proof it was Al Quaeda before attacking, and when it was PROVEN to be AQ, what did Bush do???? After all, when the investigation was finished he was president!
“1996 Bin Laden declares war on the USA and calls the USA under President Clinton….a paper tiger.
yeah right we were safer under a Democratic President. What you smoking boy, pass it around, don’t be selfish, we all want to live in la la la land with you. moron.
Comment by Conservatron — July 5, 2007 @ 4:55 pm”
I think you are the one smoking something…… I remember Clinton being openly welcomed by ALL countries he traveled to…… Hell even Bush can’t travel in the US without having some kind of protest where he is going…….
You get a ‘D’ for effort…..
July 5th, 2007 at 5:03 pmComment by Perry Logan
Where did you copy and paste that from? I would like to see more about it.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:03 pmsome times I wonder whether I’m really in US of America, the most Technologically Advanced country !!!
Naturalized Citizen
July 5th, 2007 at 5:04 pmRushitco: An Exceptional Pig!
July 5th, 2007 at 5:06 pmI think you are the one smoking something…… I remember Clinton being openly welcomed by ALL countries he traveled to…… Hell even Bush can’t travel in the US without having some kind of protest where he is going…….
You get a ‘D’ for effort…..
Comment by RemoveBush
July 5th, 2007 at 5:06 pm—————————————————–
Yep a travel agent for President that’s what we need.
#123, Idiot,
the terrorist attack against the Pope was actually discovered by Phillipino authorities while they were investigating terrorists in the Phillipines. the terrorist retards were so inept that when the Phillipino police went to their apartments they neglected to destroy the evidence.
Guess what fool, Clinton had nothing to do with it. I know your Democratic gods and pundits have told you otherwise, but try to think on your own rather than cutting and pasting a bunch of crap from a super, duper Liberal website.
fcking Libtards, such pathetic fools.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:07 pm#123 Unbelievable: Fabulous work here! Thanks for furnishing us all of these Clinton accolades. Certainly a president who has a 8 billion dollar surplus at the end of this terms has accomplished more than this dweeb could accomplish in his wildest dreams!
July 5th, 2007 at 5:08 pmLooks like our little idiotron is imploding…..hahaha! Tuff stuff, dude!
July 5th, 2007 at 5:09 pmDo yourself a favor and hit the road. Isn’t it ten minutes over your time to punch out??
I think you are the one smoking something…… I remember Clinton being openly welcomed by ALL countries he traveled to…… Hell even Bush can’t travel in the US without having some kind of protest where he is going…….
You get a ‘D’ for effort…..
Comment by RemoveBush — July 5, 2007 @ 5:03 pm
Oh I forgot, for you libtards, the measure of a good President is whether or not the whole world is licking his balls and penis. Sorry.
and sorry, when President clinton traveled to South America, he was booed, geered, his caravan was spat on, etc, etc.
get Clinton’s d!ck out of your mouth, you will start making sense, ok?
July 5th, 2007 at 5:09 pmWeird…I show my kids pictures of Bill-O and tell them that they’ll always be surrounded by morons and they’ll have to get used to it.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:09 pm…and do not forget that Clinton foreign policy 800,000 dead Rwandans in peace time presidency.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:10 pm“I disagree we were never safe before when the plans for 9/11 were being made. We now have more security and better intel to stop future attacks.”
You make the assumption that the Official Version of what happened on 9/11 is true…… Given the evidence now, it is hard to say that it was AQ that performed 9/11. There is more evidence to prove that AQ was NOT involved with 9/11 then there is to support that notion.
I agree
At least we can agree on something.
“Clearly we were hated 7 years ago or 9/11 never would have happened. Unfortunately protecting ourselves has cast us in a poor light among other countries.”
See my previous comment about this….
“I disagree the constitution is still in tact. I assume you are referring to wiretapping and intense interrogation. Unfortunately it takes extreme measures to protect our country. Lincoln and FDR understood this, which is why today’s liberal have good intentions but are very dangerous.”
Sorry, but you are truely WRONG!!!!
In the examples given the COURTS told Lincoln and FDR that they COULD NOT do that……
And your assumption that we should give up libberty for protection means that we DESERVE NEITHER!!!! It’s odd that for over 230 years we were able to protect our country without destroying the Constitution…..
Oh……. And the warrentless wiretapps were planned and ongoing only 3 weeks after Bush got into office….. I did not know that we were under attack back then…….. Please provide me the events that warrented the surveilence of Americans before 9/11?????
July 5th, 2007 at 5:10 pm#131 Life is tough when you keep getting biotch-slapped, isn’t it?
July 5th, 2007 at 5:11 pm#123 Unbelievable: Fabulous work here! Thanks for furnishing us all of these Clinton accolades. Certainly a president who has a 8 billion dollar surplus at the end of this terms has accomplished more than this dweeb could accomplish in his wildest dreams!
Comment by veritas — July 5, 2007 @ 5:08 pm
wow, no wonder you are a Libtard, they love peoplw without an education!
Retard, read up on your Constitution, most of us learned this in 8th grade civic class…..Congress has the power of the purse, not the President, so guess what, the surplus had NOTHING to do with the President.
son, child, my little dweeb, open up a book and please, for your sake son, get an education, ok? you desperatly need one.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:12 pmYep, Patrick. There are homophobic homosexual, “hillbilly heroin” addicts everywhere. You may think that just because your town is heterosexual — there are homophobic homosexual, “hillbilly heroin” addicts. They’re hiding in the shadows, and they are lurking there, and they’re around and the odds are that many of them are in the school system.
And even more of them in the pundit media.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:13 pm…and do not forget that Clinton foreign policy 800,000 dead Rwandans in peace time presidency.
Comment by Flaco — July 5, 2007 @ 5:10 pm
EXACTLY FLACO!!!!!
Thanks to the UN and President Clinton doing nothing, 800,000 Tutsis died at the hands of the machetees of Hutus.
800,000 Tutsis’ death are on the hands of President Clinton and the UN.
only Libtards would defend this atrocity. fcking rats.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:13 pmRemoveBush: Slap em with facts - fictional characters like these drooling trolls can’t deal with fact.
Of course, the warrantless (highly illegal) wiretapping was occurring well in advance of 911….as was the composition of the Patriot Act….as were the plans to invade Iraq…..shall we go on?? The facts are beginning to stack up and take shape and it’s beginning to look pretty ugly for the neocons. I’d suggest radical plastic surgery for each of them in the not-too-distant future.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:14 pm1993 First WTC bombing which was ment to bring down the tower.
yep, all clinton’s fault. he had been in office all of 35 days. blame clinton for this and yet howl in disapproval when bush is accused of doing nothing for eight months before 9/11.
that is the definition of hypocrisy.
you always claim clinton did nothing. far from it:
1996 Attack on American base in Sauid Arabia by Al Qaeda
According to the United States, classfied evidence suggests that the government of Iran was the key sponsor of the incident, and several high ranking members of their military may have been involved.[3] The U.S. government may have been hesitant to more aggressively pursue the offenders within the Iranian military due to the recent rise of a more reformist government and a desire to enhance relations with Iran at the time. [a trend that has ended since bush has been in office…wonder why? could it be his incredible diplomacy skills?]
A U.S. federal court has found that the Khobar Towers bombing was authorized by Ali Khamenei, then leader of Iran.
so what are you smoking?
1998 American Embassies in Africa are blow up and destroyed by Al Qaeda
In response to the bombings, U.S. President Bill Clinton ordered Operation Infinite Reach, a series of cruise missile strikes on terrorist targets in Sudan and Afghanistan on August 20, 1998
2000 USS Cole attacked 17 naval personell die, thanks to who? Al Qaeda
Evidence of al-Qaeda’s involvement was inconclusive for months after the attack. The staff of the 9-11 Commission found that al-Qaeda’s direction of the bombing was under investigation but “increasingly clear” on November 11, 2000. It was an “unproven assumption” in late November. By December 21 the CIA had made a “preliminary judgment” that “al Qaeda appeared to have supported the attack,” with no “definitive conclusion.”[11]
Accounts thereafter are varied and somewhat contradictory.
Then-National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice told the Commission that when the administration took office on January 20, 2001, “We knew that there was speculation that the 2000 Cole attack was al Qaeda… We received, I think, on January 25th the same assessment [of al-Qaeda responsibility]. It was preliminary. It was not clear.”
so the cole bombing fell on the bush administration…and they did nothing.
on the contrary, clinton actually had a pretty good record of responding to terrorist attacks, once they knew who was responsible.
one more thing, conservatron, where is osama? dead or alive? how come it took 411 days to begin investigating 9/11?
July 5th, 2007 at 5:14 pm#138 Contrary to your bio, you did enter the 8th grade then?? Well, glory be! Never would have guessed it by the tone and tenor of your inane, drivel-spewn posts.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:15 pm“I disagree we were never safe before when the plans for 9/11 were being made. We now have more security and better intel to stop future attacks.â€
You make the assumption that the Official Version of what happened on 9/11 is true…… Given the evidence now, it is hard to say that it was AQ that performed 9/11. There is more evidence to prove that AQ was NOT involved with 9/11 then there is to support that notion.
I agree
At least we can agree on something.
“Clearly we were hated 7 years ago or 9/11 never would have happened. Unfortunately protecting ourselves has cast us in a poor light among other countries.â€
See my previous comment about this….
“I disagree the constitution is still in tact. I assume you are referring to wiretapping and intense interrogation. Unfortunately it takes extreme measures to protect our country. Lincoln and FDR understood this, which is why today’s liberal have good intentions but are very dangerous.â€
Sorry, but you are truely WRONG!!!!
In the examples given the COURTS told Lincoln and FDR that they COULD NOT do that……
And your assumption that we should give up libberty for protection means that we DESERVE NEITHER!!!! It’s odd that for over 230 years we were able to protect our country without destroying the Constitution…..
Oh……. And the warrentless wiretapps were planned and ongoing only 3 weeks after Bush got into office….. I did not know that we were under attack back then…….. Please provide me the events that warrented the surveilence of Americans before 9/11?????
Comment by RemoveBush — July 5, 2007 @ 5:10 pm
Are you stupid? even Lincoln said that America shouldn’t allow the Constituiton to be the death of America.
try to figure out what he ment, my dumb Libtard.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:15 pmTrolls have no supporting evidence or fact checks….just a load of pure bull$hit and nonsense which is why most of us choose to ignore their worthless posts.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:17 pmso the cole bombing fell on the bush administration…and they did nothing.
on the contrary, clinton actually had a pretty good record of responding to terrorist attacks, once they knew who was responsible.
one more thing, conservatron, where is osama? dead or alive? how come it took 411 days to begin investigating 9/11?
Comment by lonesomerobot — July 5, 2007 @ 5:14 pm
Really, good response to terrorist attacks? So lobbying a few missles to unmaned terrorist camps is what you call a good response?
Or did Clinton call up the military and took Bin Laden and killed him?
do tell, Clinton had from 1993 until 2000 to capture Bin Laden, did he?
is this what youc all a good response to terrorist attacks?
another Libtard wack job that knows well how to cut and paste.
poor Libtards, so desperate to defend their god Clinton.
pathetic, I am embarrassed for you Libtards.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:17 pm…and do not forget that Clinton foreign policy 800,000 dead Rwandans in peace time presidency.
Comment by Flaco — July 5, 2007 @ 5:10 pm
I know this must be upsetting to you. You’ve only managed to kill 650,000 Iraqis in a wartime presidency, and it must hurt to be so close but so far to Clinton’s record. But take heart - that’s an old figure for Iraq- I’m sure you’ll be passing 800,000 dead very soon.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:18 pmhttp://www.physics911.net/faq
Get facts, trollturds!
July 5th, 2007 at 5:18 pmPlease provide me the events that warrented the surveilence of Americans before 9/11?????
Comment by RemoveBush — July 5, 2007 @ 5:10 pm
Are you stupid? even Lincoln said that America shouldn’t allow the Constituiton to be the death of America.
try to figure out what he ment, my dumb Libtard.
Comment by Conservatron — July 5, 2007 @ 5:15 pm
Oh I get it, Lincoln thought that a Stasi-style police state would be a good thing for Amurka. Man. I’ve been misreading Lincoln all along.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:18 pmme too
July 5th, 2007 at 5:19 pmTrolls have no supporting evidence or fact checks….just a load of pure bull$hit and nonsense which is why most of us choose to ignore their worthless posts.
Comment by veritas — July 5, 2007 @ 5:17 pm
hahahaha!!! yes, veritas, I guess you believe the crap that you spew out of your mouth, eh?
so you call facts and evidence the cutting and pasting that you Libtards are doing from Liberal websites that hate anything that even comes close to being conservative?
riiiiiiiggggggghhhhhht veritas, man you are a pathetic human being. NO wonder you are Libtard.
tell me, did Clinton capture Bin Laden? did he destroy the terrorist camps he had in Afghanistan and through out the world? did he send our military against Bin Laden?
he did all this things, right? right?
pathetic veritas, the sand part is that you honestly believe you are well informed. I pity you my child. I truly pity you.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:20 pmveritas do not say 9/11 or ace will show up any minute.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:20 pmdo tell, Clinton had from 1993 until 2000 to capture Bin Laden, did he?
Chimpy’s been ‘looking for him’ since Jan 2001 and has been using the ENTIRE military since Sep 2001 - who’s record is better?
July 5th, 2007 at 5:20 pm#123 Unbelievable: Fabulous work here! Thanks for furnishing us all of these Clinton accolades.
The kudos goes to Perry Logan for that list (I was the Republican ‘brick wall’ posts sandwiched around him :)
It was a great post, and should be repeated every time a trolls says ‘Clinton!!!’
Certainly a president who has a 8 billion dollar surplus at the end of this terms has accomplished more than this dweeb could accomplish in his wildest dreams!
Comment by veritas — July 5, 2007 @ 5:08 pm
No kidding…
July 5th, 2007 at 5:20 pm#148
On nooooooooooo! you mentioned 9\11.
ace will be here any minute
a=rabs
July 5th, 2007 at 5:22 pmc=onspire
e=vil
“Or did Clinton call up the military and took Bin Laden and killed him?
do tell, Clinton had from 1993 until 2000 to capture Bin Laden, did he?
is this what youc all a good response to terrorist attacks?
another Libtard wack job that knows well how to cut and paste.
poor Libtards, so desperate to defend their god Clinton.
pathetic, I am embarrassed for you Libtards.
Comment by Conservatron — July 5, 2007 @ 5:17 pm”
I know you are not trying to play this card……..
Sooooo……. Where is OBL and in what jail/grave is he in?????
How is OBL’s family doing after 9/11???? Oh, wait you cant say because they were flown out of the country shortly afte 9/11……
How about Tora Bora????? Hmmmmmm…… He got away?????
“wanted dead or alive”, “I really don’t know where he is….. I’m really not that concerned about him”
For this effort, you get ‘FFF’
July 5th, 2007 at 5:22 pm…and do not forget that Clinton foreign policy 800,000 dead Rwandans in peace time presidency.
Comment by Flaco — July 5, 2007 @ 5:10 pm
I know this must be upsetting to you. You’ve only managed to kill 650,000 Iraqis in a wartime presidency, and it must hurt to be so close but so far to Clinton’s record. But take heart - that’s an old figure for Iraq- I’m sure you’ll be passing 800,000 dead very soon.
Comment by toasterhead — July 5, 2007 @ 5:18 pm
so that’s the best answer you have to defend your god Clinton? make up some ridiculous number of deaths of Iraqis? hahahahaha!!!!!!!
so since you think it was ok for Clinton to allow the death of 800,000 Tutsis, why are you crying about Bush’s supposed 650,000 deaths.
by the way, if you go to Rwanda, you can see the mass graves, the skulls, the mass killing fields.
Now can you please tell me or guide me to a neutral sources that shows the graves of 650,000 Iraqis dead?
where is the hardcore, first hand evidence like in Rwanda, of the Marxist, communist claim that 650,000 Iraqis have died?
July 5th, 2007 at 5:23 pmRemoveBush
How is OBL’s family doing after 9/11???? Oh, wait you cant say because they were flown out of the country shortly afte 9/11…
Vast Nutwing Conspiracy=VNC
The JooooOOOoooOOOoooOOoooOOOs
July 5th, 2007 at 5:24 pmdo tell, Clinton had from 1993 until 2000 to capture Bin Laden, did he?
Chimpy’s been ‘looking for him’ since Jan 2001 and has been using the ENTIRE military since Sep 2001 - who’s record is better?
Comment by TerrytheTurtle — July 5, 2007 @ 5:20 pm
Let us see, under Clinton Bin Laden said, “The United States is a paper tiger.” and in 1996 declared war on the USA.
Bush inherited a war that started under President Clinton. Study some history before you talk out of your smelly ass.
Clinton sent out lawyers to go after Al Qaeda and Bin Laden. When the military had the chance to kill Bin Laden, the Clinton administration said no. Wonder why, eh?
Bin Laden kep on denegrading the USA while Clinton was at the helm.
After 9/11, which was part of a war that had started under Clinton, Bin Laden lives in a cave and doesn’t say squat about the USA. Instead pissing in his tunic and crying like a baby the coward sends out his terrorist followers to give messages to the world.
yes, you are right, Bush has a better record. Thank you for noticing.
you may yet be saved from the dark side, my little Libtard.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:26 pm“where is the hardcore, first hand evidence like in Rwanda, of the Marxist, communist claim that 650,000 Iraqis have died?
Comment by Conservatron — July 5, 2007 @ 5:23 pm”
I doubt that someone has sat down and counted each and EVERY bone to get that value….. They extrapulate that information… Just like they did in this report.
BTW: This is the ACCEPTED method of determining deaths in a given area, like Rwanda or Iraq!
http://www.jhsph.edu/ publichealthnews/ press_releases/ 2006/ burnham_iraq_2006.html
July 5th, 2007 at 5:28 pm#123 Unbelievable: Fabulous work here! Thanks for furnishing us all of these Clinton accolades.
The kudos goes to Perry Logan for that list (I was the Republican ‘brick wall’ posts sandwiched around him :)
It was a great post, and should be repeated every time a trolls says ‘Clinton!!!’
Certainly a president who has a 8 billion dollar surplus at the end of this terms has accomplished more than this dweeb could accomplish in his wildest dreams!
Comment by veritas — July 5, 2007 @ 5:08 pm
No kidding…
Comment by unbelievable — July 5, 2007 @ 5:20 pm
Only Clinton’s whores would say that Clinton has a great record after he refuse to help the 800,000 Tutsis, men, women and children, who were massacred by the Hutus.
man you people are disgusting human beings. You put you party and your ideology to shame.
Libtards say, “Yes, Clinton has a better record than Bush, he allowed the death of 800,000 Tutsis with the help of the UN.”
well, if this is a record you want your god to hold, by all means, Liberal whores, have him hold it.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:28 pmHey TP you’ve heard it here first.
Rove will bring out Osama during the 2008 elections for a landslide victory for the Republiscums.
Shhh be very quiet I’m huntin’ Osamas.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:29 pmhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/ 2/ hi/ uk_news/ politics/ 6495753.stm
Difficult to do a grave count in the middle of a civil war, but the Lancet study was peer-reviewed, widely accepted statistical methods. Of this approx 30% are ‘attributable to the coalition’ So no, not 650,000 - only 200,000 are the coalition’s fault - I bet that’s a relief to everyone, eh?
July 5th, 2007 at 5:30 pm“After 9/11, which was part of a war that had started under Clinton, Bin Laden lives in a cave and doesn’t say squat about the USA. Instead pissing in his tunic and crying like a baby the coward sends out his terrorist followers to give messages to the world.
yes, you are right, Bush has a better record. Thank you for noticing.
you may yet be saved from the dark side, my little Libtard.
Comment by Conservatron — July 5, 2007 @ 5:26 pm”
I see….. So as long as they are not seen then everything is just fine?????
Typical BS from a Republican……
If he is still alive, he is a powerful person to be running the AQ organization and can still deliever plans and money to them as well….
Your ignorance really does blind you doesn’t it???
July 5th, 2007 at 5:31 pmDead Tutsis are not humans to Libs. They have pretty much forgotten about them. It’s in the past. You know forgive and forget. they are the party of Compassion.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:31 pmConservatron…Why do you think that Bin Laden attacked us on Sept. 11. Do you think he was thinking..”Boy , if I just knock down a couple of buildings, the Americans will flee Muslim Lands in Terror, and never come back”
July 5th, 2007 at 5:32 pmNo… the attack on Sept. 11 was BAIT, and Bush took it.
Could someone please supply the actual Lincoln quote regarding the Constitution and the death of America? I’d really like to see it, along with the context it was used in, assuming it exists. Maybe its just some hideous Liberal Lie!
July 5th, 2007 at 5:32 pmComment by unbelievable — July 5, 2007 @ 5:20 pm
Only Clinton’s whores would say that Clinton has a great record after he refuse to help the 800,000 Tutsis, men, women and children, who were massacred by the Hutus.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:33 pm——————————————————
Clinton is a Christian too.
You make the assumption that the Official Version of what happened on 9/11 is true…… Given the evidence now, it is hard to say that it was AQ that performed 9/11. There is more evidence to prove that AQ was NOT involved with 9/11 then there is to support that notion
Is this what the left has now? I can’t read anything else you write after seeing this…I thought I was actually discussing with somebody that could rationally look at this.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:33 pm