Limbaugh warns 13 yr old caller about dangerous liberals.
Limbaugh warns 13 yr old caller about dangerous liberals.
On Rush Limbaugh’s radio show Tuesday, a 13 year old caller named Patrick complained that he was forced to read “liberal magazines like Time and Newsweek” in school which explained the globe was getting warmer. The caller said he was skeptical of the science because “my parents have always been skeptical of it.” Limbaugh then offered the following encouragement to the caller:
RUSH: Patrick, this will be a good lesson. There are liberals everywhere. You may think that just because your town is conservative — there are liberals. They’re hiding in the shadows, and they are lurking there, and they’re around and the odds are that many of them are in the school system. You’ll probably at some point probably have to watch [Al Gore's movie], unless your parents and other parents find out about it and demand, “If you’re going to show this movie, you better show the Great Global Warming Swindle and put the other side to our kids out there.” Well, congratulations. I’m glad you called and told us this. This is the kind of thing that gives us all encouragement for the future. Here you are at 13, already aware of when you’re watching propaganda. That’s great.
Topic Cloud
ArchivesBlog Roll
I wonder how much they paid the kid to say that..?
July 5th, 2007 at 3:54 pm“Here you are at 13, already aware of when you’re watching propaganda. That’s great.”
But unaware that he’s listening to it. That’s great…
July 5th, 2007 at 3:55 pmI don’t think they had to pay him. Brought up in a right-wing home … but I can’t believe people are still skeptical. And talking about propaganda! What about the right-wing propaganda. Idiot.
July 5th, 2007 at 3:55 pmTime?
July 5th, 2007 at 3:56 pmNewsweek?
Liberal propaganda?
Ah ha
Ah ha ha
Ah ha ha ha
Ah ha ha ha ha
Ah ha ha ha ha ha
Ah ha ha ha ha ha ha
There is a special place in Hell for these bastards and sadly it will be standing room only.
July 5th, 2007 at 3:57 pmDon’t worry young man. A well rounded education is not necessary for you. It will only cause you to think for yourself which may end up being detrimental to my stock options down the road. Drop out now and join the fight against public education.
July 5th, 2007 at 3:58 pmI think the average age of a Limbaugh listener is declining, what is the average now, about 19?
July 5th, 2007 at 3:58 pmThe whole idea that global warming ins liberal propaganda doesn’t make sense. How do liberals benefit from the belief that the world is warming???
July 5th, 2007 at 3:58 pmDid anyone see JESUS CAMP?
There is a scene where the mother is teaching her kid how foolish global warming is. Talked to her kid, saying something like “The temperature has risen only about a degree – doesn’t that seem like enough to mean it will do any damage?” The kid said “No” and then they both smiled contently.
July 5th, 2007 at 3:58 pmOh please. “The Great Global Warming Swindle”? Still???
Check here for a comprehensive listing of the reasons you need not waste 75 minutes of your time watching this dreck.
July 5th, 2007 at 3:59 pm#2. My thoughts as well.
July 5th, 2007 at 3:59 pmWasn’t Time the one that named Bush man of the year?
Liberal huh?
Anyway, it is nice to know that in the great world of political movements we are basically Batman.
July 5th, 2007 at 3:59 pmDamn! That reminds me, I’ve been shirking my lurking duties lately! I better go find some bushes and shadows to tempt children with my liberal propaganda. “Pssst! Hey kid! Want some Mother Jones?”
July 5th, 2007 at 3:59 pm#7
I think the average age of a Limbaugh listener is declining, what is the average now, about 19?
Comment by Raven — July 5, 2007 @ 3:58 pm
I think 19 actually refers to the IQ of the average Limpball listener.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:00 pmToo funny. One only wishes there was an alternate universe we could send Rush to where his fantasy was really true: liberals outing and persecuting conservatives like the Fat Man himself. You know, kids snitching on their parents who then get hauled off the gulag. Oh, sadly that has happened too many times in history. I wonder if Rush knows?
It would be one thing if Rush believed his own blather. But I suspect it’s an act, you know, a day job to pay for his pills and sex trips to the Carribean.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:00 pmYeah that’s right Rush, equate liberals with slimy low life’s that lurk around in the shadows like pedophiles.
He is right about one thing, there are liberals everywhere.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:00 pmDo we have claws too?
These sound like the same things they said about witches. And then the commies, and then the japanese, and then the commies again, the blacks, the mexicans, the arabs…
I wonder if they’re just going to eventually come out and say ‘If you’re not this hair color, this skin color, and this religion, with these particular beliefs (at least practiced unto others…), we hate you.
I’m 17, I encouraged the use of An Inconvenient Truth in my high school. I encouraged my science teacher to talk about that issue. I talked with my fellow students, and I ensured they all knew a simple fact: If someone’s telling you something, and they don’t cite a source, you need to check up on it. I occasionally get checked-up on too, and they laugh in my face on it, because I encouraged them to do that.
I think Rage Against the Machine put it rightly: “We gotta kick ‘em out.” And we should start with this generation, and it should be preached thereafter.
-Xbot
July 5th, 2007 at 4:00 pmThe caller said he was skeptical of the science because “my parents have always been skeptical of it.”
A typical dittohead. Doesn’t think for himself. No wonder Rush took the call.
As for liberals hiding in the shadows…Not anymore:
Another Runaway Quarter For MSNBC And Olbermann.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:00 pm“MSNBC’s growth is powered by a surging Countdown with Keith Olbermann. The most recent quarter continues a pattern of Countdown battering away at The Factor’s lead, just as it has been doing for the past year.”
“If you’re going to show this movie, you better show the Great Global Warming Swindle and put the other side to our kids out there.â€
Hmm. The other side. Just like the fairness doctrine does for talk radio.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:01 pmTime and Newsweek are liberal huh? LOL.
Time and Newsweek are owned by giant corporations. And who owns giant corporations? Wild-eyed, shaggy, dope-smoking liberals? LOL.
Don’t make me laugh. They just hired Bill Kristol for Crissakes.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:01 pmThat poor dumb kid hasn’t got a chance.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:01 pmNow I’m scared. Rush told me that there are lots of liberals just lurking out there. I look behind bushes as I walk past them. I don’t want some liberal jump out and start to educate me. Lord please save me!!
July 5th, 2007 at 4:02 pmLiberals?
July 5th, 2007 at 4:02 pmYes, Rush, we’re around every corner, in every car,
at every McDonalds pickup window,
at the end of every Wal-Mart checkout lane…
We’re everywhere, on your street, in your basement, and behind your closet door.
We’re even under your bed at night…..
(BOO)
#9 Did anyone see JESUS CAMP?
Comment by Anonymous By Choice — July 5, 2007 @ 3:58 pm
What an absolutely frightening movie and a testament to how malleable young minds are. Brainwashing is real and it’s happening right now in an Evangelical MegaChurch near you.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:03 pmDigDug
What you have to understand is:
You know how you get some liberals who think Israel is behind everything?
Well, that is the entire Conservative movement, except instead of Isreal, read “Scientist.”
July 5th, 2007 at 4:03 pmMusta been Patrick1, calling to offer his worship to the drug addict.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:04 pm#9 Did anyone see JESUS CAMP?
Comment by Anonymous By Choice — July 5, 2007 @ 3:58 pm
What an absolutely frightening movie and a testament to how malleable young minds are. Brainwashing is real and it’s happening right now in an Evangelical MegaChurch near you.
Comment by Lupeyg2 — July 5, 2007 @ 4:03 pm
Absolutely horrifying film. Child abuse at it’s most insidious.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:05 pmDamn liberals! Always forcing kids to read. Whats next? Forcing this kid to learn science?
July 5th, 2007 at 4:05 pmhmmm. Here come some young kid. Let’s jump out and scare the bejeezus out of him.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:06 pmRush is still illegally using drugs. If one can not hear/see this, then one is obviously drinking too much kool aid.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:07 pmOr could it be, the 20% pro bush hate America crowd are those indulging in the pharmaceuticals and are too drugged, as limp…, to see reality.
Boogie boogie boogie!
July 5th, 2007 at 4:07 pmMaybe Patrick was a Republican Senator pretending to be 13…
Thank you Xbot… you’ve got my support for kicking them out and it just may have to be your generation. I’m counting on you.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:08 pmWhat next? Them liberuls will be tellin our yungsters that cavemen didn’t eat dinosaurs?
July 5th, 2007 at 4:08 pmWhat then, the Flintstones are just a cartoon? Oh the shame!
Rush should have told this kid that Democrats/liberals are better people than republican/conservatives and that the kid should support liberals or he is going straight to hell.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:08 pm#27 Child abuse at it’s most insidious.
Comment by Zooey — July 5, 2007 @ 4:05 pm
Without a doubt that is child abuse. Implanting irrational fears into the heads of children which then causes obvious severe emotional distress is worse than some of the things my wife (social worker) takes kids out of homes for.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:09 pmThere are liberals everywhere. You may think that just because your town is conservative — there are liberals. They’re hiding in the shadows, and they are lurking there, and they’re around and the odds are that many of them are in the school system.
Lifted by paraphrase from “The Eternal Jew”….
July 5th, 2007 at 4:10 pmHey, like, ya know what?
July 5th, 2007 at 4:11 pmJust for making a phone call, and asking this question they gave me to ask, they gave me this really cool X-box thingy, with some really cool games, like “End of the Universe”, and “Big Deal Drugrunners”,
and this really weird one called “King Karls Keep” that I’m supposed to listen to at night while I sleep.
I had to sign all these papers, but they wouldn’t let me have any of them…. donch’a think that’s weird?
They were about servitude or something like that, you know what I mean?
I mean, what does that mean?
Ya know what I mean?
It’s just a good thing that the kids’ parents are Dittoheads or he’d be turning them in to the HUAC. Limbaugh sounds like one of those Red Scare “news” films from the 50s. What a jerk.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:11 pmSo the consensus judgment is that the caller was patrick? I’m thinking maybe it was m12, and he exaggerated his age to sound more mature.
Either way, I wouldn’t completely give up on this kid. if he’s that deeplyindoctrinated at 13, it’s possible that he’ll rebel at 16 and become a wild-eyed, dirty f*cking hippie.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:12 pmAnd I bet Junior believes that Adam and Eve rode dinosaurs.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:13 pmCalling in the ALL shoes…………
ANY 2008 RED seats go after them, hunt them down.
All finger lap top pickers…..
start infecting red state newpapers, start infecting red thread boards with financial charts, (post below under car pool for troops)
call red congressmen that are UP for re-election in 2008. Target those Republican Troop Murderers for their seat at the 2008 dinner table.
List out the murders that they have done since the REPUBLICANS stopped the withdrawal of our troops.
They are dirty rats, that lie, cheat and kill the american middle class families. The republicans have more blood on their hands than convicts living in prison, including sleeezeeeee LIBBY.
Go start the posts on any RED main boards ……………..
elk
July 5th, 2007 at 4:13 pm13 is actually an appropriate age for Limbaugh listerners. It’s when kids are just beginning to think critically and (therefore?) tend to believe they know everything. I used to believe 13 was GWB’s intellectual/emotional age; then a psychiatrist told me he thought GWB’s development ended around 9.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:15 pmRush Limbaugh. Bedwetting and obese drug addict and childless, thrice divorced, patron of underage sex meccas.
Yep, the perfect voice for the Bush/Coulter Republican Party.
-GSD
July 5th, 2007 at 4:15 pm“You’ll probably at some point probably have to watch [Al Gore’s movie], unless your parents and other parents find out about it and demand, “If you’re going to show this movie, you better show the Great Global Warming Swindle and put the other side to our kids out there.—
that is the typical bs you hear from the right wing, and yet that is exactly what most ‘news’ shows do. They put on the facts, and then have a blow hard right wing nut job spew ten time more lies and inacuracies. Thats the ‘other’ side.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:15 pm“…it’s possible that he’ll rebel at 16 and become a wild-eyed, dirty f*cking hippie.”
Comment by spit take
I’m here to testify: It’s been known to happen. LOL
July 5th, 2007 at 4:16 pm#9 Did anyone see JESUS CAMP?
Comment by Anonymous By Choice — July 5, 2007 @ 3:58 pm
What an absolutely frightening movie and a testament to how malleable young minds are. Brainwashing is real and it’s happening right now in an Evangelical MegaChurch near you.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:17 pmComment by Lupeyg2
——————————————————
This is nothing compared to the Palenstinian kiddy camps with suicide belts, Allah Akbar, death to Jews etc……
“I wonder how much they paid the kid to say that..?
Comment by JG — July 5, 2007″
Why? Bacause he doesn’t agree with your garbage science?
July 5th, 2007 at 4:19 pmAll I can say is that I hope these liberal hatin’ conservatives find themselves down and out in the gutter. When they need some one to give them a helping hand, they’ll meet one of their heroic, self-centered conservatives who will admonish them to get a job and pull themselves up by their bootstraps.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:20 pm#46 This is nothing compared to the Palenstinian kiddy camps with suicide belts, Allah Akbar, death to Jews etc……
Comment by Flaco — July 5, 2007 @ 4:17 pm
So are you justifying the brainwashing? Wouldn’t it make more sense to try and prevent those kids from adhering to extremism rather than build up your own counter-extremism and then war it out?
Is this a new take on an old talking point – “The Palestinians did it too”?
July 5th, 2007 at 4:20 pm“I can’t believe people are still skeptical.
Comment by RushHater — July 5, 2007″
And you can explain to us why we shouldn’t be skeptical?
July 5th, 2007 at 4:21 pmHere you are at 13, already aware of when you’re watching propaganda. That’s great.
And your Rush Limbaugh armband and brown shirt are on their way to you now…
July 5th, 2007 at 4:21 pm#42 penalcolony
July 5th, 2007 at 4:21 pmThat’s the age when lil W was shoving lit firecrackers up frog’s asses, makes sense when you look at the mess in Iraq.
Hey, michael has joined us and he’s brought all of his counterarguments with him….
July 5th, 2007 at 4:22 pm“There is a special place in Hell for these bastards and sadly it will be standing room only.
Comment by Maddie — July 5, 2007″
Oh please. Aren’t you capable of saying anything a little more intelligent than that?
July 5th, 2007 at 4:22 pmwhatever it is, I’m against it.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:23 pm“I think the average age of a Limbaugh listener is declining, what is the average now, about 19?
Comment by Raven — July 5, 2007″
That’s a good thing because as they get older they will have the bases for making intelligent decisions!
July 5th, 2007 at 4:24 pmWhy? Bacause he doesn’t agree with your garbage science?
Comment by michael — July 5, 2007 @ 4:19 pm
What’s “garbage science” about it? Just because you don’t agree with it?
July 5th, 2007 at 4:24 pmWhy? Bacause he doesn’t agree with your garbage science?
And you can explain to us why we shouldn’t be skeptical?
Oh please. Aren’t you capable of saying anything a little more intelligent than that?
Comments by michael
In 3 posts, you’ve managed to add nothing to your side of the debate (and I’m humoring you by actually calling it a debate…since a debate implies that there is credibility to both sides of the argument).
July 5th, 2007 at 4:25 pmOh please. Aren’t you capable of saying anything a little more intelligent than that?
Comment by michael — July 5, 2007 @ 4:22 pm
Why do you assume that Maddie is not capable of saying anything more intelligent than that?
July 5th, 2007 at 4:25 pmCongratulations Patrick! At 13 years old you are all ready as big a fool as your parents. Takes most folks a lot longer than 13 years to be totally brainwashed but you were easy. Who ever said there was no fool like an old fool when here we have a nice young fool all set to take his place in the lineup of morons, flatearthers and conservative pinheads. So sad to think that some poor girl will someday marry this waste of DNA and spawn.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:26 pmYeah, you got to watch out for us liberals. We’ll stuck your blood and make your kids gay and learn tolerance. Bwahahahahahahahaha!
/sarcasm
July 5th, 2007 at 4:27 pmThat’s a good thing because as they get older they will have the bases for making intelligent decisions!
Comment by michael — July 5, 2007 @ 4:24 pm
Oh, please. What makes you figure that they will be “intelligent” decisions?
July 5th, 2007 at 4:27 pmWhy? Bacause he doesn’t agree with your garbage science?
And you can explain to us why we shouldn’t be skeptical?
Oh please. Aren’t you capable of saying anything a little more intelligent than that?
Comments by michael
In 3 posts, you’ve managed to add nothing to your side of the debate (and I’m humoring you by actually calling it a debate…since a debate implies that there is credibility to both sides of the argument).
Comment by Lupeyg2 — July 5, 2007 @ 4:25 pm
Looks like mikey has had his three questions for this thread – everyone gets to cross the bridge now and pay no more attention to him.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:27 pmLurking liberals? Wait, nobody told me we were supposed to lurk. Did I miss a meeting? I was busy infiltrating – damn it’s hard to keep up with the liberal conspiricy!
July 5th, 2007 at 4:28 pmLooks like mikey has had his three questions for this thread – everyone gets to cross the bridge now and pay no more attention to him.
Comment by TerrytheTurtle — July 5, 2007 @ 4:27 pm
Dammit! That was good.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:28 pm#64 Comment by TerrytheTurtle — July 5, 2007 @ 4:27 pm
You can always use his playbook and just keep questioning his questions to an asinine degree.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:29 pmRush added, “Hey, kid. Let me know if you need any illegal prescription drugs. I can take care of you.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:29 pm#65: Yes. “Lurk” is the new directive from those who set the liberal agenda. By the way, according to the agenda, we’ve got a 15 minute break coming up at 3:30.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:30 pmShortly afterwords Rush asked his staff to supply the contact information on the boy…Rush wants to keep “helping”.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:30 pmQuit talking about Al Gore III
July 5th, 2007 at 4:31 pm“That’s a good thing because as they get older they will have the bases for making intelligent decisions!”
Comment by michael
Well, that is the Conflict Capitalists dream,
to have the bases, right? (pardon the pun)
Or did you mean basis?
(Did you get a late start on your personal programming, or are you just a “slow learner”?)
July 5th, 2007 at 4:32 pm“Musta been Patrick1
Comment by RUCerious — July 5, 2007″
i wouldn’t doubt that for a minute.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:33 pmThat’s a good thing because as they get older they will have the bases for making intelligent decisions!
Comment by michael —
Jeez you are dumb. What “bases” will they have, the ones in Iraq?
All your base are belong to us Micheal.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:33 pmThis is nothing compared to the Palenstinian kiddy camps with suicide belts, Allah Akbar, death to Jews etc……
Comment by Flaco — July 5, 2007 @ 4:17 pm
Where are these camps, exactly? What part of “Palenstine?” I’m always hearing about these indoctrination training camps for “Palenstinian” youth, yet I’ve yet to see any proof that they actually exist. At least, proof that’s not supplied by MEMRI and AIPAC.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:33 pmThis is the typical type of propaganda that we can expect from the right wing and Republican elite. For years they have been painting all Democrats and liberals as dangerous, subhuman enemies of the state. We can laugh all that we want at how stupid these characterizations are. We can dismiss the tactic as inappropriate. We can swear that we will not adopt such personal, nonsubstantive arguments. However, our country elect Bush and re-elected him to a second term; lived under an all Republican controlled government until the 2006 election and we have watched our Supreme Court turned into a throw back of the late 1800’s. Take it seriously and develop a way to counter the propaganda. We may very well carry the presidency but we will live with the courts and nonpartisan career civil servants chosen by Bush for many years. We were lucky that a majority seems to be waking up. We may not be that lucky the next time.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:33 pmWaaaauuuuugggghhhh! Liberals! Liberals! They’re Everywhere! Night of the Living Liberals! Board up your windows and doors! They’ll try and make you think and Not Obey! Hear only the soothing words of the Great Deciderer and he will deliver you from the evil Liberals!
July 5th, 2007 at 4:34 pmThey should just come right out and say it:
” the Truth is Liberal Propaganda! Any institution that tries to give you that damn Truth is a dirty Liberal conspiracy! The world is flat! All people came from White Folks Adam and Eve! The Universe is ours to do with as we please! Everything else is Liberal Propaganda designed to…. to what?…. what exactly is the Liberal Propaganda designed to do? Oh Yeah! Embolden the terrorists! Global Warming Emboldens the Terrorists!”
I just saw some dimwit on Faux Noise saying that “National Healthcare would allow terrorists into the country.
How can you bring yourself to say something some so stupid?
July 5th, 2007 at 4:35 pm“That’s a good thing because as they get older they will have the bases for making intelligent decisions!”
Comment by michael
By listening to the propaganda being spoonfed to them? Judging by your own spelling if you’re defending this sheepification I weep for our youth (it’s basis with an I by the way)!
July 5th, 2007 at 4:35 pmI am so happy for the Jungsturm Rush Limpbaughs!
July 5th, 2007 at 4:35 pmThat’s a good thing because as they get older they will have the bases for making intelligent decisions!
Comment by michael — July 5, 2007 @ 4:24 pm
Oh, please. What makes you figure that they will be “intelligent†decisions?
Comment by spit take — July 5, 2007 @ 4:27 pm
When can one comment on intelligence when he doesn’t know the difference between bases and basics.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:36 pmYou can always use his playbook and just keep questioning his questions to an asinine degree.
Comment by Lupeyg2 — July 5, 2007 @ 4:29 pm
True, but I already have a five-year-old at home.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:36 pmNo wonder so many of his listeners have “minds full of mush”.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:36 pmOH MY GOD! there’s a liberal in my house!!!!
eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
oh wait, that’s just me.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:36 pm“However, our country elect Bush and re-elected him to a second term”
That defends on your definition of ‘elect’; personally I believe Bush was not ‘elected’ either time…
July 5th, 2007 at 4:37 pmSeems like this 13 yr old kid is wise beyond his years. Kudos to his parents for their involvement in his education.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:37 pmI like lurking in leafy, limber larches.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:38 pmDon’t waste your time on this article; send to the FCC as offensive material. They have to put it in their records.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:38 pmThe majority of America did NOT elect herr dubyah in 2000.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:39 pmAt least, proof that’s not supplied by MEMRI…
Comment by toasterhead
——————————————
Dude you are not serious. You mean CAIR
July 5th, 2007 at 4:40 pm….the limberness lends lots of leverage when I leap.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:41 pmhey, don’t worry about flaky, the skinny troll. he obviously doesn’t realize the treasure trove of comparing the misdeeds of politicians’ children he’s just opened up (barb and jenna bush).
certainly there isn’t anyone on the right that has children that have gotten in trouble with the law (noelle bush).
certainly flaky realizes that it would be completely hypocritical to attack al gore because of his son’s unwise actions. because certainly it’s in bad taste to criticize the bushes for their children’s mistakes…
i wonder what the “liberal media” will do?
July 5th, 2007 at 4:41 pmI wish liberals actually did more lurking in the shadows — where I live they won’t shut up!
July 5th, 2007 at 4:42 pmThe majority of America did NOT elect herr dubyah in 2000.
Comment by Dr. Matt — July 5, 2007 @ 4:39 pm
Yeah but I voted twice and my second one counted lots.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:44 pmThey kill Mickey Mouse….
http://www.memritv.org/Transcript.asp?P1=1497
July 5th, 2007 at 4:44 pmTo say that liberals are lurking in the corners trying to get you is a bit extreme. For the most part they believe that they are doing the right thing and have good intentions. Unfortunately, it is their good intentions that end up being the opposite for our country which is what makes them dangerous.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:45 pmhttp://www.memritv.org/
this stuff is lovely
July 5th, 2007 at 4:46 pmThey kill Mickey Mouse….
Comment by Flaco
I hate to do this to you, limpdick, but Mickey Mouse ain’t real.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:46 pmRush is hearing all those stories about the younger generation of Muslims being indoctrinated to hate America, so he’s doing his part to generate a new breed of young Republican haters here at home.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:46 pmComment by lonesomerobot — July 5, 2007 @ 4:41 pm
What about Neil ‘love me long time’ Bush?
July 5th, 2007 at 4:48 pmUnfortunately, it is their good intentions that end up being the opposite for our country which is what makes them dangerous.
Comment by wow!
Wow. What a doofus.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:49 pmComment by Cynicon Implant
Are they openly lurking?
July 5th, 2007 at 4:49 pmThat could then be considered loitering….
Does that make you nervous?
Rush is hearing all those stories about the younger generation of Muslims being indoctrinated to hate America, so he’s doing his part to generate a new breed of young Republican haters here at home.
Comment by Toss these losers — July 5, 2007 @ 4:46 pm
Typical Liberal…..are you this blind? do you not see the left wing hate on this site against conservatives? against Republicans? against Limbaugh?
sad, sad…once again Liberals show their great hypocrisy.
TP Liberals thrive spewing out hate against anyone that is not a Libtard like them.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:50 pmOkay, I have not the time, the patience, nor the stomach to listen to this particular link, but I do have one question…
July 5th, 2007 at 4:50 pmdid Rush end the segment by asking this 13 year old boy a series of questions:
” Do you have any plans this weekend? Have you ever visited a third world country like the Dominican Republic? Do you like movies about gladiators? Have you ever seen a blue little pill, and it’s magical results? Do your parents have any controlled substances for pain at home? Have you ever been in a Turkish prison? You ever seen a grown man naked?”
I will leave the lurking in the shadows for young boys to the likes of Mark Foley.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:51 pm“For the most part they believe that they are doing the right thing and have good intentions. Unfortunately, it is their good intentions that end up being the opposite for our country which is what makes them dangerous.
Comment by wow! — July 5, 2007 @ 4:45 pm”
Actually, you must be talking about Republicans.
We are LESS safer now, then we were 7 years ago.
We are IN DEBT more now, then we were 7 years ago.
We are MORE hated now, then we were 7 years ago.
We have DESTROYED the Constitution, in onlly 7 years under the Republicans…..
The Republicans are the ones that have the opposite effect on our country.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:51 pmThey kill Mickey Mouse….
http://www.memritv.org/Transcript.asp?P1=1497
Comment by Flaco — July 5, 2007 @ 4:44 pm
Yes they did.
Mickey Mouse
July 5th, 2007 at 4:51 pm***R.I.P***
___†___
http://www.memritv.org/
this stuff is lovely
Comment by Flaco — July 5, 2007 @ 4:46 pm
Lovely indeed! I love how they translated “btkhoona al-yehood” as “we will annihilate the Jews.” It’s only a teensy smidge different from the more accurate translation “the Jews will shoot us.”
July 5th, 2007 at 4:52 pmwhat, terry? you mean neil bush?
from what i gather, he’s supposed to get whatever he wants. it’s a bush thing. no crime here. move along.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:52 pmRush added, “Hey, kid. Let me know if you need any illegal prescription drugs. I can take care of you.
Comment by Bush is Corrupt — July 5, 2007 @ 4:29 pm
Yes, he gave him directiosn to Al Gore’s son’s house.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:52 pmBOO!
July 5th, 2007 at 4:53 pmI wish liberals actually did more lurking in the shadows — where I live they won’t shut up!
Comment by Cynicon Implant — July 5, 2007 @ 4:42 pm
So you then come here – a liberal blog – to escape it? Huh?
Oh, and P.S., check out the First Amendment…
July 5th, 2007 at 4:53 pmWow. What a doofus.
Comment by Zooey
I am so hurt.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:54 pmLumNuts, you have drugs? What a person to look up to, sad sad. Even if his parent were on the left or right side ,would let your child listen to someone like Lumnuts, these must be some kind of parents.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:54 pmare you sure it wasn’t jeb bush’s daughter’s house, conservatron?
July 5th, 2007 at 4:55 pm“For the most part they believe that they are doing the right thing and have good intentions. Unfortunately, it is their good intentions that end up being the opposite for our country which is what makes them dangerous.
Comment by wow! — July 5, 2007 @ 4:45 pmâ€
Actually, you must be talking about Republicans.
We are LESS safer now, then we were 7 years ago.
We are IN DEBT more now, then we were 7 years ago.
We are MORE hated now, then we were 7 years ago.
We have DESTROYED the Constitution, in onlly 7 years under the Republicans…..
The Republicans are the ones that have the opposite effect on our country.
Comment by RemoveBush — July 5, 2007 @ 4:51 pm
yea, we were really safe under President Clinton when….
1993 First WTC bombing which was ment to bring down the tower.
1996 Attack on American base in Sauid Arabia by Al Qaeda
1998 American Embassies in Africa are blow up and destroyed by Al Qaeda
2000 USS Cole attacked 17 naval personell die, thanks to who? Al Qaeda
1996 Bin Laden declares war on the USA and calls the USA under President Clinton….a paper tiger.
yeah right we were safer under a Democratic President. What you smoking boy, pass it around, don’t be selfish, we all want to live in la la la land with you. moron.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:55 pmThat kid better drop out of school soon, otherwise the liberals might get to him.
That way he can grow up with all the skills necessary to work at McDonalds. No liberals there right? Hopefully the jobs there won’t be outsourced at that point.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:58 pmComment by Conservatron
Who said: “We do not negotiate with terrorists?”
“Catsup is a vegetable?”
July 5th, 2007 at 4:58 pmI just hope that kid stays out of groping distance.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:58 pmWhenever Patrick1nut posts here from now on, and when I actually read is inane comments, I will automatically imagine hearing this whiny, prepubescent, nerdy ditto head stating:
that he was skeptical of the science because “my parents have always been skeptical of it.â€
*snort!*
July 5th, 2007 at 4:59 pmOf course the kid was a child actor paid to spout such nonsense. Just like that black, closet-case Armstrong Williams was paid by the Whitehouse. Gay gay hustler has an easier time getting in the whitehouse, than getting on Lush’s talk show.
Remeber that Lush went to P.R. with oxy and viagra to have “bible meatings” with kids.
July 5th, 2007 at 4:59 pm“Actually, you must be talking about Republicans.”
“We are LESS safer now, then we were 7 years ago-” I disagree we were never safe before when the plans for 9/11 were being made. We now have more security and better intel to stop future attacks.
“We are IN DEBT more now, then we were 7 years ago.”-I agree
“We are MORE hated now, then we were 7 years ago.”-Clearly we were hated 7 years ago or 9/11 never would have happened. Unfortunately protecting ourselves has cast us in a poor light among other countries.
“We have DESTROYED the Constitution, in onlly 7 years under the Republicans…..”-I disagree the constitution is still in tact. I assume you are referring to wiretapping and intense interrogation. Unfortunately it takes extreme measures to protect our country. Lincoln and FDR understood this, which is why today’s liberal have good intentions but are very dangerous.
Comment by RemoveBush
July 5th, 2007 at 4:59 pmFrom 1994 – 2000, Clinton had a CONSERVATIVE Congress, who wouldn’t let him do anything about Osama…
“GOP Congress blocked Clinton push for anti-terror legislation
by John Aravosis (DC) · 9/04/2006 11:10:00 AM ET
Discuss this post here: Comments (131) · digg it · reddit · FARK · · Link
CNN, July 30, 1996
Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, emerged from the meeting and said, “These are very controversial provisions that the [Clinton] White House wants. Some they’re not going to get.” ….[Hatch] also said he had some problems with the president’s proposals to expand wiretapping.
So Bill Clinton, rather than just breaking the law as Bush did (then again, perhaps this is why Bush broke the law – he knew from history that the Republicans controlling the congress would oppose his efforts to expand wiretapping), decided to go to the Republican congress in 1996 and ask them for increased authority to do more eavesdropping in order to stop the terrorists – stop September 11. Senior Republican Senator Orrin Hatch, one of the GOP’s top picks for the Supreme Court and a GOP committee chair, objected.
The Republicans stopped President Clinton from getting all the tools he needed to stop the next September 11 – well, no, actually they opposed giving President Clinton all the tools he needed to stop the actual September 11. Could September 11 have been stopped if the GOP had given President Clinton the tools he requested to stop Osama and Mohammad Atta from killing 3,000 people in New York, Pennsylvania and Washington?”
http://www.americablog.com/2006/09/gop-congress-blocked-clinton-push-for.html
July 5th, 2007 at 5:00 pmResponse to #116:
Here’s what a real President did against terrorism:
# PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON developed the nation’s first anti-terrorism policy, and appointed first national coordinator of anti-terrorist efforts.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:00 pm# Bill Clinton stopped cold the Al Qaeda millennium hijacking and bombing plots.
# Bill Clinton stopped cold a planned attack to kill the Pope.
# Bill Clinton stopped cold a planned attack to blow up 12 U.S. jetliners simultaneously.
# Bill Clinton stopped cold a planned attack to blow up UN Headquarters.
# Bill Clinton stopped cold a planned attack to blow up FBI Headquarters.
# Bill Clinton stopped cold a planned attack to blow up the Israeli Embassy in Washington.
# Bill Clinton stopped cold a planned attack to blow up Boston airport.
# Bill Clinton stopped cold a planned attack to blow up Lincoln and Holland Tunnels in NY.
# Bill Clinton stopped cold a planned attack to blow up the George Washington Bridge.
# Bill Clinton stopped cold a planned attack to blow up the US Embassy in Albania.
# Bill Clinton tried to kill Osama bin Laden and disrupt Al Qaeda through preemptive strikes (efforts denounced by the G.O.P.).
# Bill Clinton brought perpetrators of first World Trade Center bombing and CIA killings to justice.
# Bill Clinton did not blame the Bush I administration for first World Trade Center bombing even though it occurred 38 days after Bush left office. Instead, worked hard, even obsessively — and successfully — to stop future terrorist attacks.
# Bill Clinton named the Hart-Rudman commission to report on nature of terrorist threats and major steps to be taken to combat terrorism.
# Bill Clinton sent legislation to Congress to tighten airport security. (Remember, this is before 911) The legislation was defeated by the Republicans because of opposition from the airlines.
# Bill Clinton sent legislation to Congress to allow for better tracking of terrorist funding. It was defeated by Republicans in the Senate because of opposition from banking interests.
# Bill Clinton sent legislation to Congress to add tagents to explosives, to allow for better tracking of explosives used by terrorists. It was defeated by the Republicans because of opposition from the NRA.
# Bill Clinton increased the military budget by an average of 14 per cent, reversing the trend under Bush I.
# Bill Clinton tripled the budget of the FBI for counterterrorism and doubled overall funding for counterterrorism.
# Bill Clinton detected and destroyed cells of Al Qaeda in over 20 countries.
# Bill Clinton created national stockpile of drugs and vaccines including 40 million doses of smallpox vaccine.
# Of Clinton’s efforts says Robert Oakley, Reagan Ambassador for Counterterrorism: “Overall, I give them very high marks” and “The only major criticism I have is the obsession with Osama”.
# Paul Bremer, current Civilian Administrator of Iraq disagrees slightly with Robert Oakley as he believed the Bill Clinton Administration had “correctly focused on bin Laden.
# Barton Gellman in the Washington Post put it best, “By any measure available, Bill Clinton left office having given greater priority to terrorism than any president before him” and was the “first administration to undertake a systematic anti-terrorist effort”.
President Clinton urged Congress Tuesday to act swiftly in developing anti-terrorism legislation before its August recess.
“We need to keep this country together right now. We need to focus on this terrorism issue,” Clinton said during a White House news conference.
But while the president pushed for quick legislation, Republican lawmakers hardened their stance against some of the proposed anti-terrorism measures.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:01 pmThere’s even an audio clip of President Clinton practically begging the Republicans to give him the tools he needed to stop Osama and the terrorists. Trent Lott said no. Orrin Hatch said no. Do these men really deserve to run the Congress during a time of war?
Lush WOOD make a good repug page leader.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:02 pm“yea, we were really safe under President Clinton when….
1993 First WTC bombing which was ment to bring down the tower.”
Really????? So then the informant for the FBI is just a silly little fool and all of those tapes he made of the FBI telling him how to do it and providing him with the material is just an imagination???? It is NOW public record….. Try doing some danm reading to learn the truth…..
“1996 Attack on American base in Sauid Arabia by Al Qaeda”
Yet, your strong president removed our troops from SA per the request of OBL……
“1998 American Embassies in Africa are blow up and destroyed by Al Qaeda”
Nothing like the bombings and killings going on now!!!! I guess in your crazy mind, the more people that die the better the situation. IDIOT!
“2000 USS Cole attacked 17 naval personell die, thanks to who? Al Qaeda”
Yep, and Bush did NOTHING ABOUT IT! Clinton wanted proof it was Al Quaeda before attacking, and when it was PROVEN to be AQ, what did Bush do???? After all, when the investigation was finished he was president!
“1996 Bin Laden declares war on the USA and calls the USA under President Clinton….a paper tiger.
yeah right we were safer under a Democratic President. What you smoking boy, pass it around, don’t be selfish, we all want to live in la la la land with you. moron.
Comment by Conservatron — July 5, 2007 @ 4:55 pm”
I think you are the one smoking something…… I remember Clinton being openly welcomed by ALL countries he traveled to…… Hell even Bush can’t travel in the US without having some kind of protest where he is going…….
You get a ‘D’ for effort…..
July 5th, 2007 at 5:03 pmComment by Perry Logan
Where did you copy and paste that from? I would like to see more about it.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:03 pmsome times I wonder whether I’m really in US of America, the most Technologically Advanced country !!!
Naturalized Citizen
July 5th, 2007 at 5:04 pmRushitco: An Exceptional Pig!
July 5th, 2007 at 5:06 pmI think you are the one smoking something…… I remember Clinton being openly welcomed by ALL countries he traveled to…… Hell even Bush can’t travel in the US without having some kind of protest where he is going…….
You get a ‘D’ for effort…..
Comment by RemoveBush
July 5th, 2007 at 5:06 pm—————————————————–
Yep a travel agent for President that’s what we need.
#123, Idiot,
the terrorist attack against the Pope was actually discovered by Phillipino authorities while they were investigating terrorists in the Phillipines. the terrorist retards were so inept that when the Phillipino police went to their apartments they neglected to destroy the evidence.
Guess what fool, Clinton had nothing to do with it. I know your Democratic gods and pundits have told you otherwise, but try to think on your own rather than cutting and pasting a bunch of crap from a super, duper Liberal website.
fcking Libtards, such pathetic fools.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:07 pm#123 Unbelievable: Fabulous work here! Thanks for furnishing us all of these Clinton accolades. Certainly a president who has a 8 billion dollar surplus at the end of this terms has accomplished more than this dweeb could accomplish in his wildest dreams!
July 5th, 2007 at 5:08 pmLooks like our little idiotron is imploding…..hahaha! Tuff stuff, dude!
July 5th, 2007 at 5:09 pmDo yourself a favor and hit the road. Isn’t it ten minutes over your time to punch out??
I think you are the one smoking something…… I remember Clinton being openly welcomed by ALL countries he traveled to…… Hell even Bush can’t travel in the US without having some kind of protest where he is going…….
You get a ‘D’ for effort…..
Comment by RemoveBush — July 5, 2007 @ 5:03 pm
Oh I forgot, for you libtards, the measure of a good President is whether or not the whole world is licking his balls and penis. Sorry.
and sorry, when President clinton traveled to South America, he was booed, geered, his caravan was spat on, etc, etc.
get Clinton’s d!ck out of your mouth, you will start making sense, ok?
July 5th, 2007 at 5:09 pmWeird…I show my kids pictures of Bill-O and tell them that they’ll always be surrounded by morons and they’ll have to get used to it.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:09 pm…and do not forget that Clinton foreign policy 800,000 dead Rwandans in peace time presidency.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:10 pm“I disagree we were never safe before when the plans for 9/11 were being made. We now have more security and better intel to stop future attacks.”
You make the assumption that the Official Version of what happened on 9/11 is true…… Given the evidence now, it is hard to say that it was AQ that performed 9/11. There is more evidence to prove that AQ was NOT involved with 9/11 then there is to support that notion.
I agree
At least we can agree on something.
“Clearly we were hated 7 years ago or 9/11 never would have happened. Unfortunately protecting ourselves has cast us in a poor light among other countries.”
See my previous comment about this….
“I disagree the constitution is still in tact. I assume you are referring to wiretapping and intense interrogation. Unfortunately it takes extreme measures to protect our country. Lincoln and FDR understood this, which is why today’s liberal have good intentions but are very dangerous.”
Sorry, but you are truely WRONG!!!!
In the examples given the COURTS told Lincoln and FDR that they COULD NOT do that……
And your assumption that we should give up libberty for protection means that we DESERVE NEITHER!!!! It’s odd that for over 230 years we were able to protect our country without destroying the Constitution…..
Oh……. And the warrentless wiretapps were planned and ongoing only 3 weeks after Bush got into office….. I did not know that we were under attack back then…….. Please provide me the events that warrented the surveilence of Americans before 9/11?????
July 5th, 2007 at 5:10 pm#131 Life is tough when you keep getting biotch-slapped, isn’t it?
July 5th, 2007 at 5:11 pm#123 Unbelievable: Fabulous work here! Thanks for furnishing us all of these Clinton accolades. Certainly a president who has a 8 billion dollar surplus at the end of this terms has accomplished more than this dweeb could accomplish in his wildest dreams!
Comment by veritas — July 5, 2007 @ 5:08 pm
wow, no wonder you are a Libtard, they love peoplw without an education!
Retard, read up on your Constitution, most of us learned this in 8th grade civic class…..Congress has the power of the purse, not the President, so guess what, the surplus had NOTHING to do with the President.
son, child, my little dweeb, open up a book and please, for your sake son, get an education, ok? you desperatly need one.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:12 pmYep, Patrick. There are homophobic homosexual, “hillbilly heroin” addicts everywhere. You may think that just because your town is heterosexual — there are homophobic homosexual, “hillbilly heroin” addicts. They’re hiding in the shadows, and they are lurking there, and they’re around and the odds are that many of them are in the school system.
And even more of them in the pundit media.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:13 pm…and do not forget that Clinton foreign policy 800,000 dead Rwandans in peace time presidency.
Comment by Flaco — July 5, 2007 @ 5:10 pm
EXACTLY FLACO!!!!!
Thanks to the UN and President Clinton doing nothing, 800,000 Tutsis died at the hands of the machetees of Hutus.
800,000 Tutsis’ death are on the hands of President Clinton and the UN.
only Libtards would defend this atrocity. fcking rats.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:13 pmRemoveBush: Slap em with facts – fictional characters like these drooling trolls can’t deal with fact.
Of course, the warrantless (highly illegal) wiretapping was occurring well in advance of 911….as was the composition of the Patriot Act….as were the plans to invade Iraq…..shall we go on?? The facts are beginning to stack up and take shape and it’s beginning to look pretty ugly for the neocons. I’d suggest radical plastic surgery for each of them in the not-too-distant future.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:14 pm1993 First WTC bombing which was ment to bring down the tower.
yep, all clinton’s fault. he had been in office all of 35 days. blame clinton for this and yet howl in disapproval when bush is accused of doing nothing for eight months before 9/11.
that is the definition of hypocrisy.
you always claim clinton did nothing. far from it:
1996 Attack on American base in Sauid Arabia by Al Qaeda
According to the United States, classfied evidence suggests that the government of Iran was the key sponsor of the incident, and several high ranking members of their military may have been involved.[3] The U.S. government may have been hesitant to more aggressively pursue the offenders within the Iranian military due to the recent rise of a more reformist government and a desire to enhance relations with Iran at the time. [a trend that has ended since bush has been in office...wonder why? could it be his incredible diplomacy skills?]
A U.S. federal court has found that the Khobar Towers bombing was authorized by Ali Khamenei, then leader of Iran.
so what are you smoking?
1998 American Embassies in Africa are blow up and destroyed by Al Qaeda
In response to the bombings, U.S. President Bill Clinton ordered Operation Infinite Reach, a series of cruise missile strikes on terrorist targets in Sudan and Afghanistan on August 20, 1998
2000 USS Cole attacked 17 naval personell die, thanks to who? Al Qaeda
Evidence of al-Qaeda’s involvement was inconclusive for months after the attack. The staff of the 9-11 Commission found that al-Qaeda’s direction of the bombing was under investigation but “increasingly clear” on November 11, 2000. It was an “unproven assumption” in late November. By December 21 the CIA had made a “preliminary judgment” that “al Qaeda appeared to have supported the attack,” with no “definitive conclusion.”[11]
Accounts thereafter are varied and somewhat contradictory.
Then-National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice told the Commission that when the administration took office on January 20, 2001, “We knew that there was speculation that the 2000 Cole attack was al Qaeda… We received, I think, on January 25th the same assessment [of al-Qaeda responsibility]. It was preliminary. It was not clear.”
so the cole bombing fell on the bush administration…and they did nothing.
on the contrary, clinton actually had a pretty good record of responding to terrorist attacks, once they knew who was responsible.
one more thing, conservatron, where is osama? dead or alive? how come it took 411 days to begin investigating 9/11?
July 5th, 2007 at 5:14 pm#138 Contrary to your bio, you did enter the 8th grade then?? Well, glory be! Never would have guessed it by the tone and tenor of your inane, drivel-spewn posts.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:15 pm“I disagree we were never safe before when the plans for 9/11 were being made. We now have more security and better intel to stop future attacks.â€
You make the assumption that the Official Version of what happened on 9/11 is true…… Given the evidence now, it is hard to say that it was AQ that performed 9/11. There is more evidence to prove that AQ was NOT involved with 9/11 then there is to support that notion.
I agree
At least we can agree on something.
“Clearly we were hated 7 years ago or 9/11 never would have happened. Unfortunately protecting ourselves has cast us in a poor light among other countries.â€
See my previous comment about this….
“I disagree the constitution is still in tact. I assume you are referring to wiretapping and intense interrogation. Unfortunately it takes extreme measures to protect our country. Lincoln and FDR understood this, which is why today’s liberal have good intentions but are very dangerous.â€
Sorry, but you are truely WRONG!!!!
In the examples given the COURTS told Lincoln and FDR that they COULD NOT do that……
And your assumption that we should give up libberty for protection means that we DESERVE NEITHER!!!! It’s odd that for over 230 years we were able to protect our country without destroying the Constitution…..
Oh……. And the warrentless wiretapps were planned and ongoing only 3 weeks after Bush got into office….. I did not know that we were under attack back then…….. Please provide me the events that warrented the surveilence of Americans before 9/11?????
Comment by RemoveBush — July 5, 2007 @ 5:10 pm
Are you stupid? even Lincoln said that America shouldn’t allow the Constituiton to be the death of America.
try to figure out what he ment, my dumb Libtard.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:15 pmTrolls have no supporting evidence or fact checks….just a load of pure bull$hit and nonsense which is why most of us choose to ignore their worthless posts.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:17 pmso the cole bombing fell on the bush administration…and they did nothing.
on the contrary, clinton actually had a pretty good record of responding to terrorist attacks, once they knew who was responsible.
one more thing, conservatron, where is osama? dead or alive? how come it took 411 days to begin investigating 9/11?
Comment by lonesomerobot — July 5, 2007 @ 5:14 pm
Really, good response to terrorist attacks? So lobbying a few missles to unmaned terrorist camps is what you call a good response?
Or did Clinton call up the military and took Bin Laden and killed him?
do tell, Clinton had from 1993 until 2000 to capture Bin Laden, did he?
is this what youc all a good response to terrorist attacks?
another Libtard wack job that knows well how to cut and paste.
poor Libtards, so desperate to defend their god Clinton.
pathetic, I am embarrassed for you Libtards.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:17 pm…and do not forget that Clinton foreign policy 800,000 dead Rwandans in peace time presidency.
Comment by Flaco — July 5, 2007 @ 5:10 pm
I know this must be upsetting to you. You’ve only managed to kill 650,000 Iraqis in a wartime presidency, and it must hurt to be so close but so far to Clinton’s record. But take heart – that’s an old figure for Iraq- I’m sure you’ll be passing 800,000 dead very soon.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:18 pmhttp://www.physics911.net/faq
Get facts, trollturds!
July 5th, 2007 at 5:18 pmPlease provide me the events that warrented the surveilence of Americans before 9/11?????
Comment by RemoveBush — July 5, 2007 @ 5:10 pm
Are you stupid? even Lincoln said that America shouldn’t allow the Constituiton to be the death of America.
try to figure out what he ment, my dumb Libtard.
Comment by Conservatron — July 5, 2007 @ 5:15 pm
Oh I get it, Lincoln thought that a Stasi-style police state would be a good thing for Amurka. Man. I’ve been misreading Lincoln all along.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:18 pmme too
July 5th, 2007 at 5:19 pmTrolls have no supporting evidence or fact checks….just a load of pure bull$hit and nonsense which is why most of us choose to ignore their worthless posts.
Comment by veritas — July 5, 2007 @ 5:17 pm
hahahaha!!! yes, veritas, I guess you believe the crap that you spew out of your mouth, eh?
so you call facts and evidence the cutting and pasting that you Libtards are doing from Liberal websites that hate anything that even comes close to being conservative?
riiiiiiiggggggghhhhhht veritas, man you are a pathetic human being. NO wonder you are Libtard.
tell me, did Clinton capture Bin Laden? did he destroy the terrorist camps he had in Afghanistan and through out the world? did he send our military against Bin Laden?
he did all this things, right? right?
pathetic veritas, the sand part is that you honestly believe you are well informed. I pity you my child. I truly pity you.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:20 pmveritas do not say 9/11 or ace will show up any minute.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:20 pmdo tell, Clinton had from 1993 until 2000 to capture Bin Laden, did he?
Chimpy’s been ‘looking for him’ since Jan 2001 and has been using the ENTIRE military since Sep 2001 – who’s record is better?
July 5th, 2007 at 5:20 pm#123 Unbelievable: Fabulous work here! Thanks for furnishing us all of these Clinton accolades.
The kudos goes to Perry Logan for that list (I was the Republican ‘brick wall’ posts sandwiched around him :)
It was a great post, and should be repeated every time a trolls says ‘Clinton!!!’
Certainly a president who has a 8 billion dollar surplus at the end of this terms has accomplished more than this dweeb could accomplish in his wildest dreams!
Comment by veritas — July 5, 2007 @ 5:08 pm
No kidding…
July 5th, 2007 at 5:20 pm#148
On nooooooooooo! you mentioned 9\11.
ace will be here any minute
a=rabs
July 5th, 2007 at 5:22 pmc=onspire
e=vil
“Or did Clinton call up the military and took Bin Laden and killed him?
do tell, Clinton had from 1993 until 2000 to capture Bin Laden, did he?
is this what youc all a good response to terrorist attacks?
another Libtard wack job that knows well how to cut and paste.
poor Libtards, so desperate to defend their god Clinton.
pathetic, I am embarrassed for you Libtards.
Comment by Conservatron — July 5, 2007 @ 5:17 pm”
I know you are not trying to play this card……..
Sooooo……. Where is OBL and in what jail/grave is he in?????
How is OBL’s family doing after 9/11???? Oh, wait you cant say because they were flown out of the country shortly afte 9/11……
How about Tora Bora????? Hmmmmmm…… He got away?????
“wanted dead or alive”, “I really don’t know where he is….. I’m really not that concerned about him”
For this effort, you get ‘FFF’
July 5th, 2007 at 5:22 pm…and do not forget that Clinton foreign policy 800,000 dead Rwandans in peace time presidency.
Comment by Flaco — July 5, 2007 @ 5:10 pm
I know this must be upsetting to you. You’ve only managed to kill 650,000 Iraqis in a wartime presidency, and it must hurt to be so close but so far to Clinton’s record. But take heart – that’s an old figure for Iraq- I’m sure you’ll be passing 800,000 dead very soon.
Comment by toasterhead — July 5, 2007 @ 5:18 pm
so that’s the best answer you have to defend your god Clinton? make up some ridiculous number of deaths of Iraqis? hahahahaha!!!!!!!
so since you think it was ok for Clinton to allow the death of 800,000 Tutsis, why are you crying about Bush’s supposed 650,000 deaths.
by the way, if you go to Rwanda, you can see the mass graves, the skulls, the mass killing fields.
Now can you please tell me or guide me to a neutral sources that shows the graves of 650,000 Iraqis dead?
where is the hardcore, first hand evidence like in Rwanda, of the Marxist, communist claim that 650,000 Iraqis have died?
July 5th, 2007 at 5:23 pmRemoveBush
How is OBL’s family doing after 9/11???? Oh, wait you cant say because they were flown out of the country shortly afte 9/11…
Vast Nutwing Conspiracy=VNC
The JooooOOOoooOOOoooOOoooOOOs
July 5th, 2007 at 5:24 pmdo tell, Clinton had from 1993 until 2000 to capture Bin Laden, did he?
Chimpy’s been ‘looking for him’ since Jan 2001 and has been using the ENTIRE military since Sep 2001 – who’s record is better?
Comment by TerrytheTurtle — July 5, 2007 @ 5:20 pm
Let us see, under Clinton Bin Laden said, “The United States is a paper tiger.” and in 1996 declared war on the USA.
Bush inherited a war that started under President Clinton. Study some history before you talk out of your smelly ass.
Clinton sent out lawyers to go after Al Qaeda and Bin Laden. When the military had the chance to kill Bin Laden, the Clinton administration said no. Wonder why, eh?
Bin Laden kep on denegrading the USA while Clinton was at the helm.
After 9/11, which was part of a war that had started under Clinton, Bin Laden lives in a cave and doesn’t say squat about the USA. Instead pissing in his tunic and crying like a baby the coward sends out his terrorist followers to give messages to the world.
yes, you are right, Bush has a better record. Thank you for noticing.
you may yet be saved from the dark side, my little Libtard.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:26 pm“where is the hardcore, first hand evidence like in Rwanda, of the Marxist, communist claim that 650,000 Iraqis have died?
Comment by Conservatron — July 5, 2007 @ 5:23 pm”
I doubt that someone has sat down and counted each and EVERY bone to get that value….. They extrapulate that information… Just like they did in this report.
BTW: This is the ACCEPTED method of determining deaths in a given area, like Rwanda or Iraq!
http://www.jhsph.edu/publichealthnews/press_releases/2006/burnham_iraq_2006.html
July 5th, 2007 at 5:28 pm#123 Unbelievable: Fabulous work here! Thanks for furnishing us all of these Clinton accolades.
The kudos goes to Perry Logan for that list (I was the Republican ‘brick wall’ posts sandwiched around him :)
It was a great post, and should be repeated every time a trolls says ‘Clinton!!!’
Certainly a president who has a 8 billion dollar surplus at the end of this terms has accomplished more than this dweeb could accomplish in his wildest dreams!
Comment by veritas — July 5, 2007 @ 5:08 pm
No kidding…
Comment by unbelievable — July 5, 2007 @ 5:20 pm
Only Clinton’s whores would say that Clinton has a great record after he refuse to help the 800,000 Tutsis, men, women and children, who were massacred by the Hutus.
man you people are disgusting human beings. You put you party and your ideology to shame.
Libtards say, “Yes, Clinton has a better record than Bush, he allowed the death of 800,000 Tutsis with the help of the UN.”
well, if this is a record you want your god to hold, by all means, Liberal whores, have him hold it.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:28 pmHey TP you’ve heard it here first.
Rove will bring out Osama during the 2008 elections for a landslide victory for the Republiscums.
Shhh be very quiet I’m huntin’ Osamas.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:29 pmhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/6495753.stm
Difficult to do a grave count in the middle of a civil war, but the Lancet study was peer-reviewed, widely accepted statistical methods. Of this approx 30% are ‘attributable to the coalition’ So no, not 650,000 – only 200,000 are the coalition’s fault – I bet that’s a relief to everyone, eh?
July 5th, 2007 at 5:30 pm“After 9/11, which was part of a war that had started under Clinton, Bin Laden lives in a cave and doesn’t say squat about the USA. Instead pissing in his tunic and crying like a baby the coward sends out his terrorist followers to give messages to the world.
yes, you are right, Bush has a better record. Thank you for noticing.
you may yet be saved from the dark side, my little Libtard.
Comment by Conservatron — July 5, 2007 @ 5:26 pm”
I see….. So as long as they are not seen then everything is just fine?????
Typical BS from a Republican……
If he is still alive, he is a powerful person to be running the AQ organization and can still deliever plans and money to them as well….
Your ignorance really does blind you doesn’t it???
July 5th, 2007 at 5:31 pmDead Tutsis are not humans to Libs. They have pretty much forgotten about them. It’s in the past. You know forgive and forget. they are the party of Compassion.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:31 pmConservatron…Why do you think that Bin Laden attacked us on Sept. 11. Do you think he was thinking..”Boy , if I just knock down a couple of buildings, the Americans will flee Muslim Lands in Terror, and never come back”
July 5th, 2007 at 5:32 pmNo… the attack on Sept. 11 was BAIT, and Bush took it.
Could someone please supply the actual Lincoln quote regarding the Constitution and the death of America? I’d really like to see it, along with the context it was used in, assuming it exists. Maybe its just some hideous Liberal Lie!
July 5th, 2007 at 5:32 pmComment by unbelievable — July 5, 2007 @ 5:20 pm
Only Clinton’s whores would say that Clinton has a great record after he refuse to help the 800,000 Tutsis, men, women and children, who were massacred by the Hutus.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:33 pm——————————————————
Clinton is a Christian too.
You make the assumption that the Official Version of what happened on 9/11 is true…… Given the evidence now, it is hard to say that it was AQ that performed 9/11. There is more evidence to prove that AQ was NOT involved with 9/11 then there is to support that notion
Is this what the left has now? I can’t read anything else you write after seeing this…I thought I was actually discussing with somebody that could rationally look at this.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:33 pmI doubt that someone has sat down and counted each and EVERY bone to get that value….. They extrapulate that information… Just like they did in this report.
BTW: This is the ACCEPTED method of determining deaths in a given area, like Rwanda or Iraq!
http://www.jhsph.edu/ publichealthnews/ press_releases/ 2006/ burnham_iraq_2006.html
Comment by RemoveBush — July 5, 2007 @ 5:28 pm
Are you fcking kidding me? did you read the first sentence of the report? they say, might have, maybe, not sure, and the report continues to say that it could also be at 143,000.
nice of you to assume to the worst.
and by the way, are you saying that our troops, that the AMerican troops, the American men and women that Liberals claim to support so much indiscrimently killed 650,000 Iraqis?
furthermore, why are you so willing to claim that it is because of Bush that these people died, (obviously the number you give is completly erroneous) yet you aren’t willing to put the blame on Al Qaeda, the terrorists.
And if this number were accuarete, why don’t you speak about the millions of Iraqis that died under Hussein. If you are so worried about deaths, why don’t you speak about the millions that died under Hussein, you pathetic worm, hypocrite.
the fact is that the Rwanda count is a scientific accepted number, the number of Iraqis AND Iranians that died becausee of Hussein also is, but your number is based on lunatic, fringe, crazy, pathetic, worm like human beings.
so if you are worried about numbers, you Libtards should be happy that Hussein is no longer killing millions and mad crazy at Clinton for not doing anything to stop the 800,000 that died in Rwanda in 1994.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:33 pm#123
#Bill Clinton had Osama’s head on a silver platter. Slick Willy was playing golf and got the call he was in custody in Saudi. He declined because he was unsure if Osama had actually commited a crime against the United States. Yet Osama did declare war against The United States.
#Bill Clinton denied federal wiretaps against anyone we knew to be terrorist outside of the country.
#Bill Clinton would not allow the C.I.A.,F.B.I. and other agencies to share information with each other.
#Bill Clinton was receiving oral sex under his desk while he was on the phone with Arrafat discussing the middle east crisis.
#Bill Clinton bombed an aspirin factory in the middle of the night, right before the news about Monica was about to be released.
I could go on an on as a few of you love to do. He was a joke. The majority of the terrorist attacks on this country happend under his watch. Of course he was concerned about terrorism,but he did little to stop it. Asking the United Nations to step in and “Tell those boy’s to stop or else!!” is not good leadership.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:33 pmhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/ 2/ hi/ uk_news/ politics/ 6495753.stm
Difficult to do a grave count in the middle of a civil war, but the Lancet study was peer-reviewed, widely accepted statistical methods. Of this approx 30% are ‘attributable to the coalition’ So no, not 650,000 – only 200,000 are the coalition’s fault – I bet that’s a relief to everyone, eh?
Comment by TerrytheTurtle — July 5, 2007 @ 5:30 pm
BWAHAHAHAHA!!! from the BBC which admitted that their coverage of the Iraq War and latest events have been leaning to the left big time because of the Liberal group think that exists in their newsrooms?
dumb, dumb, dumb Libtard.
get a clue and an education while you are it.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:36 pmComment by unbelievable — July 5, 2007 @ 5:20 pm
Only Clinton’s whores would say that Clinton has a great record after he refuse to help the 800,000 Tutsis, men, women and children, who were massacred by the Hutus.
——————————————————
Clinton is a Christian too.
Comment by Flaco — July 5, 2007 @ 5:33 pm
But didn’t you know, for Liberals like Clinton and 99% of the Libtards here, a good Christian is someone that doesn’t do any killing, but allows someone else to do the killing. A good Christian to them is someone like Bill Clinton who was televised every Sunday going in and out of a Baptist Church, but didn’t kill anyone in Rwanda, he just ignored it. And this “good” Christian allowed someone else to do the killing. A good Christian to Liberals doesn’t bother himself with helping people in need like the Tutsis desperatly need Clinton and the UN in 1994.
this is the Libtards version of a good Christian.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:38 pmThis week saw more reports that France was aware of the planned genocide but chose to continue co-operation with the Rwandan army that was going to perpetrate it.
France and Rwanda recently broke off diplomatic relations.
————————————————————————————
BBC report
Hey unbelievable France sounds like you kinda place.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:40 pm“Is this what the left has now? I can’t read anything else you write after seeing this…I thought I was actually discussing with somebody that could rationally look at this.
Comment by wow! — July 5, 2007 @ 5:33 pm”
I see….. Just close your eyes and go “lalalalalalalalala”
So what is innacurate with what I wrote???? Provide evidence that proves I’m incorrect in my statement that more evidence now supports the fact that 9/11 was not performed by AQ…..
Show me where I am wrong, if you can.
I have evidence to support what I say, can you support your statement?
July 5th, 2007 at 5:40 pmThis week saw more reports that France was aware of the planned genocide but chose to continue co-operation with the Rwandan army that was going to perpetrate it.
France and Rwanda recently broke off diplomatic relations.
————————————————————————————
BBC report
Hey unbelievable,
July 5th, 2007 at 5:41 pmFrance sounds like your kinda place.
F the French!
“Comment by Conservatron — July 5, 2007 @ 5:33 pm”
Why don’t you petition the govt. to invade China since you feel that innocent deaths are something we need to invade a country for????
WARNING! GRAPHIC PHOTO’S!
http://www.scoreboard-canada.com/today-china1.htm
Of course you don’t care about this…….
July 5th, 2007 at 5:44 pmBut didn’t you know, for Liberals like Clinton and 99% of the Libtards here, a good Christian is someone that doesn’t do any killing, but allows someone else to do the killing. A good Christian to them is someone like Bill Clinton who was televised every Sunday going in and out of a Baptist Church, but didn’t kill anyone in Rwanda, he just ignored it. And this “good†Christian allowed someone else to do the killing. A good Christian to Liberals doesn’t bother himself with helping people in need like the Tutsis desperatly need Clinton and the UN in 1994.
this is the Libtards version of a good Christian.
Comment by Conservatron
————————————————
unbelievable,
July 5th, 2007 at 5:44 pmU believe Clinton was a good Christian President right?
Comment by Badger”Why do you think Bin Laden attacked us?” He hates us thats why. He hates the morals of the west. He hates the fact that women have so many rights. He hates the fact that homosexuality is prvelant in our society. He hates our freedoms to be the best we can. He does not want the Muslim world to look anything like the western world. Thats why 9/11 happend. Not to bait G.W.B. into going to war,but to bait all Muslim men to defend hundreds of years of Muslim tradition. When are you going to wake up and realize these people hate us not because of Bush?They hate who we are as a people.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:45 pmwow.. the official version of 911 has many questions about it…and the American people have Not gotten satisfactory answers. Maybe Bin Ladin did it like he claimed he did…maybe it was Moussad…maybe it was rouge elements in our own government… it was 19 guys with boxcutters for christ sake.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:46 pmWhat I do know is that the middle east is in turmoil, America gets blamed for everything bad, and Al Qaeda is more popular than ever.
And…our country is heading for bankruptcy . And bin Laden has claimed he will defeat us by bankrupting us…just like he thinks he did to the Soviets in Afghanistan. QUE BONO.
so if you are worried about numbers, you Libtards should be happy that Hussein is no longer killing millions and mad crazy at Clinton for not doing anything to stop the 800,000 that died in Rwanda in 1994.
Comment by Conservatron — July 5, 2007 @ 5:33 pm
Bill Clinton has apologized on numerous occasions for not having done more to prevent the Rwandan genocide.
George W. Bush continues to believe the Iraqi genocide is the highlight of his Presidency.
See the difference?
July 5th, 2007 at 5:46 pmBWAHAHAHAHA!!! from the BBC which admitted that their coverage of the Iraq War and latest events have been leaning to the left big time because of the Liberal group think that exists in their newsrooms?
dumb, dumb, dumb Libtard.
get a clue and an education while you are it.
Comment by Conservatron — July 5, 2007 @ 5:36 pm
Guess you failed the intelligence test eh sonny? The BBC report references the Lancet study and discusses why the British government decided not to dispute it – I guess you looked at the link address only and concluded that I was reporting from the BBC, one of several primary sources in this story.
Joke is on you f***wit
July 5th, 2007 at 5:48 pmComment by Badgerâ€Why do you think Bin Laden attacked us?†He hates us thats why. He hates the morals of the west. He hates the fact that women have so many rights. He hates the fact that homosexuality is prvelant in our society. He hates our freedoms to be the best we can. He does not want the Muslim world to look anything like the western world. Thats why 9/11 happend. Not to bait G.W.B. into going to war,but to bait all Muslim men to defend hundreds of years of Muslim tradition. When are you going to wake up and realize these people hate us not because of Bush?They hate who we are as a people.
Comment by Johnny Swank — July 5, 2007 @ 5:45 pm
In the paraphrased words of Usama bin Laden himself, “If we hated America for their freedoms, why did we not attack Sweden?”
July 5th, 2007 at 5:48 pmComment by Johnny Swank — July 5, 2007 @ 5:45 pm
Not that simple, Johnnys Wank. http://www.mideastweb.org/osamabinladen1.htm
Read and understand.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:51 pmComment by toasterhead — July 5, 2007 @ 5:48 pm
The Swedes are going to adopt the Sharia, that’s probably why.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:53 pmAre you that dumb toaster head? We were attacked because we are the lone super power who happens to be the freest nation on earth. Sweeden bottles good beer.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:53 pmRush is just afraid that the liberals might tell the girl to call the police when Rush *touches* her inappropriately…
July 5th, 2007 at 5:55 pmWhere is the Liberal, the media outrage on this story? is it because the military doesn’t look bad that the left and the media are not reporting on this?
c’mon Libtards, what’s your excuse now.
http://www.michaelyon-online.com/wp/update-on-bless-the-beasts-and-children.htm
July 5th, 2007 at 5:56 pm“Are you that dumb toaster head? We were attacked because we are the lone super power who happens to be the freest nation on earth. Sweeden bottles good beer.
Comment by Johnny Swank — July 5, 2007 @ 5:53 pm”
We were NOT attacked for our FREEDOMS…..
We WERE attacked because we keep sticking our knoses in other peoples business…..
So what would you do if China came over and took OK and said this is now our land????? Would you just sit back and do nothing???
Our govt.’s medling is what makes other people hate us and seek to attack us!!!!! IT IS NOT OUR FREEDOM!
July 5th, 2007 at 5:56 pmComment by Raven — July 5, 2007 @ 3:58 pm
No it’s 36.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:57 pmAnd if this number were accuarete (sic), why don’t you speak about the millions of Iraqis that died under Hussein(question mark needed). If you are so worried about deaths, why don’t you speak about the millions that died under Hussein, you pathetic worm, hypocrite (question mark needed).
(capital letter needed) get a clue and an education while you are it.
Comments by Conservatron
Conservatron aka howsad and various fake president names,
July 5th, 2007 at 5:57 pmI already warned you that your troll fee will be cut if you keep on making us neo-cons look as illiterate as some of us (such as George Jr.) really are with your poor spelling, run-on sentences and inability to get even the simplest of punctuation right. Please also remember that Hussein was the name of the late King of Jordan, as well, so you should really specify Saddam when you’re talking about the late Iraqi dictator (once my good friend in oil money).
I am truly sorry that our wonderful Leave No Child Behind program was too late for you, but please at least try a little more of Mama’s home schooling.
Comment by Lupeyg2 — July 5, 2007 @ 4:00 pm
That a lie because the majority are college graduates and earn more than $50K a year.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:59 pmOkay, so reading through this thread so far:
They have simply restated their position that Clinton did nothing, while not actually supporting it in any way, shape or form. One of them brought up Rwanda, which was a tragedy, and neglects to mention the severe shortage of anti-American Rwandan terrorists right now.
Their list of Clinton’s failures, for one thing is nothing worse then Bush achieved, indeed Bush actually sucks harder then Clinton simply off of the fact that unlike Clinton, Bush actually had something to work off of when he started and he ignored it.
Further, I am quite happy to learn that the troll claim that Clinton slashed military funding is false. I would be surprised but the truth is, you simply cannot trust what a conservative tells you, because they are liars.
As to Johnny Swank: They don’t hate you for your freedoms. Your freedoms don’t mean two shits to them. What they hate you for is your belief that you have the right to impose your freedoms on them.
July 5th, 2007 at 5:59 pmComment by Zooey — July 5, 2007 @ 4:05 pm
What’s real child abuse if filling their heads full of fear that the planet is going to die because of global warming.
July 5th, 2007 at 6:01 pmComment by Zooey — July 5, 2007 @ 4:05 pm
What’s real child abuse if filling their heads full of fear that the planet is going to die because of global warming.
Comment by Tracy — July 5, 2007 @ 6:01 pm
Well said Tracy!!!! but didn’t you know, Liberals don’t use fear to get people to agree with them, only Republican do this. (sarcasm of course)
July 5th, 2007 at 6:03 pm“Are you that dumb toaster head? We were attacked because we are the lone super power who happens to be the freest nation on earth. Sweeden bottles good beer.
Comment by Johnny Swank — July 5, 2007 @ 5:53 pmâ€
We were NOT attacked for our FREEDOMS…..
We WERE attacked because we keep sticking our knoses in other peoples business…..
So what would you do if China came over and took OK and said this is now our land????? Would you just sit back and do nothing???
Our govt.’s medling is what makes other people hate us and seek to attack us!!!!! IT IS NOT OUR FREEDOM!
Comment by RemoveBush — July 5, 2007 @ 5:56 pm
Retard, when the fck has the USA said that Iraq is our land? NEVER!!!!
typical Liberal to always put blame in the USA, fcking Liberal traitor. Benedict Arnold would be proud of you.
July 5th, 2007 at 6:05 pmConservatron et al…
There is a point at which you repeating your lies, which have been shown to be lies, simply makes everyone tune out your statements.
If you had posted a valid argument on this thread I have failed to detect it under the barrage of utter, complete idiocy which you conservatives, seem to so love spreading.
July 5th, 2007 at 6:06 pm“Well said Tracy!!!! but didn’t you know, Liberals don’t use fear to get people to agree with them, only Republican do this. (sarcasm of course)
Comment by Conservatron — July 5, 2007 @ 6:03 pm”
Silly rabbit……
There is MORE evidence that MAN is contributing to the changes the world is going through in the weather, than not!!!!
I really don’t know why you Republicans fight science so much….. I mean after all….. It has allowed many things to be created because of it….. Without science you would still be sitting in a cave dragging your knuckles rather than in a nice home dragging your knuckles…
July 5th, 2007 at 6:06 pm“Retard, when the fck has the USA said that Iraq is our land? NEVER!!!!
typical Liberal to always put blame in the USA, fcking Liberal traitor. Benedict Arnold would be proud of you.
Comment by Conservatron — July 5, 2007 @ 6:05 pm”
I would say that the Embasy larger than the Vatican says that well enought thank you…..
IDIOT!!
July 5th, 2007 at 6:07 pmBefore much longer the only ones that will believe in the cult of global warming will be Algore and his son. And one of them will be drunk.
July 5th, 2007 at 6:07 pmwhen the fck has the USA said that Iraq is our land
Comment by Conservatron — July 5, 2007 @ 6:05 pm
You’re absolutely right. What he should have said is the land under our Permanent Military Bases is our land.
July 5th, 2007 at 6:10 pm“Retard, when the fck has the USA said that Iraq is our land? NEVER!!!!
typical Liberal to always put blame in the USA, fcking Liberal traitor. Benedict Arnold would be proud of you.
Comment by Conservatron — July 5, 2007 @ 6:05 pmâ€
I would say that the Embasy larger than the Vatican says that well enought thank you…..
IDIOT!!
Comment by RemoveBush — July 5, 2007 @ 6:07 pm
Would you claim that our military bases through out Europe ment that Europe was ours? that Germany was ours, or how about in Asia, Japan and S. Korea, would you claim that these countries are ours because we have a huge military presence there?
think before you write you might sound smart.
July 5th, 2007 at 6:10 pmlet’s see…
troll a says president c failed, which is somehow supposed to be a good excuse for the failures of president b. that’s very reassuring to the voting public.
troll d seems to think that motivating people to take positive steps for issue e (which may incidentally help put an end problem g, if it exists) is somehow the same as using issue f (fear of terrorism) to scare people into a misguided war against i.
i find that utterly h. surely you must be j’ing.
July 5th, 2007 at 6:12 pm“Would you claim that our military bases through out Europe ment that Europe was ours? that Germany was ours, or how about in Asia, Japan and S. Korea, would you claim that these countries are ours because we have a huge military presence there?
think before you write you might sound smart.
Comment by Conservatron — July 5, 2007 @ 6:10 pm”
IDIOT!!!
We don’t have an EMBASY the size of the VATICAN in any of those countries….. Which is a signal that we are NEVER LEAVING and that WE will be running things for a very long time to come…….
Why do you think we need a Embasy that big?????? It’s not just to have a nice place to visit from time to time…
July 5th, 2007 at 6:13 pmAs to Johnny Swank: They don’t hate you for your freedoms. Your freedoms don’t mean two shits to them. What they hate you for is your belief that you have the right to impose your freedoms on them.
Comment by Bruce Gorton — July 5, 2007 @ 5:59 pm
really retard? do explain what freedom England was imposing on the filthy rich doctors that tried to blow up their super expensive Mercedez last week to kill thousands of British….do tell!
or how about Bin Laden, what freedom did we take away from this filthy rich pig….care to tell us all?
man are you a poor brainwashed fool.
you poor Libtards, it is never our enemies fault that they hate us, it is our fault, right? You Libtards love blaming America first.
pathetic, quite pathetic.
July 5th, 2007 at 6:13 pmLibtards are non believers, infidels, pigs , monkeys, get it.
July 5th, 2007 at 6:15 pmI have been thinking about starting up a “Jesus Time” and “Jesus Newsweek” magazine company… I bet I could make some serious cash off these idiots… I dont even need to pay journalists… just monkeys.
July 5th, 2007 at 6:16 pmFrank J
One day, you guys are going to be whining about why the liberals let the weather go crazy when it was absolutely clear, that global warming was a problem.
Either that or your heads will be looking very decorative atop some very splendid pikes.
I don’t know why you conservatives seem to hate science so much, no matter what the field you guys seem to feel the need to stifle research and ignore findings which go against you. You seem to have this distinct belief, deep in your souls, that there is a global conspiracy out to get you.
Well there isn’t. You just aren’t that interesting. The rest of us, we’ve noticed things like snow in Jo’burg (Bloody rare) hurricanes of record breaking strength, heatwaves sweeping across whole continents, and a whole lot of ice melting.
We have enquired into why this happening, and our best scientific minds have worked on the problem and told us that in all likelyhood, the climate is changing due to human actions. We have chosen to try and do something about it, because we do not like the new weather patterns that are emerging, you have chosen to do nothing, because you do not like people who are brighter then you.
July 5th, 2007 at 6:16 pmBefore much longer the only ones that will believe in the cult of global warming will be Algore and his son. And one of them will be drunk.
really, to show such compassion and be so in step with the majority of americans in two little sentences is amazing…a tribute to the conservative ideology.
July 5th, 2007 at 6:18 pmConservatron
Psst, you might not have noticed, but ENGLAND IS AMERICA’S ALLY IN THE MIDDLE FRIGGIN’ EAST. Moron.
And I didn’t say “Take their freedom’s away” I said impose your freedoms on them. They don’t want to be America, they look at you that is what they don’t want to be.
If you are going to reply to me, read what I wrote.
July 5th, 2007 at 6:22 pmComment by unbelievable — July 5, 2007 @ 5:00 pm
“From 1994 – 2000, Clinton had a CONSERVATIVE Congress, who wouldn’t let him do anything about Osama…”
Yes Clinton was a poor with his hands tied! Whatever! LOL! In Clinton’s hillbilly accent: “I tried to get Osama, but those bastards in Congress just wouldn’t let me do it (sniff, sniff).”
July 5th, 2007 at 6:25 pm“Yes Clinton was a poor with his hands tied! Whatever! LOL! In Clinton’s hillbilly accent: “I tried to get Osama, but those bastards in Congress just wouldn’t let me do it (sniff, sniff).â€
Comment by Tracy — July 5, 2007 @ 6:25 pm”
Isn’t it just amazing what happens when someone FOLLOWS THE CONSTITUTION??????
Imagine if Clinton had shown disregard for the Constitution back then…… But your retarded Bush can do it and he is a god……
You do realize that Congress must be consulted for such military actions????
I doubt it since you really don’t seem to understand how the Constitution is designed to work…
July 5th, 2007 at 6:30 pmThere is a good debunking of the Great Global Warming Swindle
inthegreen.typepad.com/blog/2007/03/deconstructing_.html
July 5th, 2007 at 6:36 pmComment by Perry Logan — July 5, 2007 @ 5:00 pm
And after all that al Qaeda grew in strength and sophistication to the point that we now have so many former operatives, financiers, and planners in custody that have to have special prison around the world to hold them all.
July 5th, 2007 at 6:41 pmA little history lesson on who, besides Exxon/Mobil, the coal, and nuclear indistries, started this Global Warming “skepticism” scam.
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2007/05/wolcott200705
July 5th, 2007 at 6:45 pm#128
Comment by RemoveBush — July 5, 2007 @ 5:03 pm
“Yep, and Bush did NOTHING ABOUT IT! Clinton wanted proof it was Al Quaeda before attacking, and when it was PROVEN to be AQ, what did Bush do????”
He took those responsible out with Hellfire missle in Yemen.
http://archives.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/meast/11/04/yemen.blast/index.html
I wonder what else responses in your post is inaccurate.
July 5th, 2007 at 6:45 pmBe careful Patrick! The liberals are hiding everywhere! Be sure to carry your pepper spray or else of them might get you! Just in case this does happen, be sure to always remeber to call for help by using the safety phrase: “my parents said it, so it must be true”!
July 5th, 2007 at 6:50 pm#133
Comment by Conservatron — July 5, 2007 @ 5:07 pm
Be careful. Next time he will try and tell you Clinton foiled the Millennium plot to attack LAX.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4864792/
July 5th, 2007 at 6:54 pmHey kid,
July 5th, 2007 at 7:04 pmya’ know what is really dangerous? Seeking advice from a pill poppin’ right wing fringe lunatic.
#201
Comment by RemoveBush — July 5, 2007 @ 6:06 pm
I agree with that global warming argument that man is CONTRIBUTING to the planet getting warmer. What I don’t agree with is when people like Al Gore say that man is causing the planet to warm or theat the ice caps are going to melt in our life time or that we can reverse global warming. Yes we can help postpone what is already in motion but to say we can stop it is just plain stupid. The planet has warmed and cooled before well before man came along and I have yet to hear on this blog how that happened and what caused it. I probably has been explained in another thread but I would like to hear it again if anyone care to take shot at it.
July 5th, 2007 at 7:05 pmOMG! Facts! Science! What is this country full of liberals coming to!?! If they would just leave the conservatives alone, it would be a great country, filled as it is with overwhelming deficits, a police state, eavesdropping on private conversations, torturing combatants at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo, losing Osama bin Laden, not dealing with the Gulf Coast Katrina victims, commuting the sentence of a felon convicted of vengefully outing an undercover CIA officer, foisting extreme evangelical Christianity on moderate Christians and non-Christians alike, attempting to explode the separation of Church and state … on an on, ad nauseum.
July 5th, 2007 at 7:08 pm#215
Comment by RemoveBush — July 5, 2007 @ 6:30 pm
“You do realize that Congress must be consulted for such military actions????”
What specific counter terrorism military actions are you referring to? You aren’t referring to wiretapping….are you?
July 5th, 2007 at 7:08 pm#207
Comment by RemoveBush — July 5, 2007 @ 6:13 pm
Considering the Iraqis can’t do much of anything in the way of governing themselves and it’s been years now, I would say that embassy is probably going to be necessary….for a long time.
July 5th, 2007 at 7:13 pmIt is hard to take Limbaugh seriously especially since he made fun of Michael J. Fox who has a debilitating illness like Parkinson’s disease. It showed lack of compassion. It is hard to take him seriously because he went doctor shopping to feed his addiction. It showed lack of control. It is hard to take him seriously because despite his right-wing bravado Americans still voted in huge numbers for democrats in 2006. It showed lack of influence. He has very little legitimacy. A majority of Americans disagree with much of the hate he spews on his radio show despite his large viewership. It is hard to take someone seriously because they fit in so well with our history of segregation and racism. This is someone who clearly doesn’t understand morality, compassion or humanity. Limbaugh should focus less on liberalism and more on reducing his ample girth. He should try on to be a glutton.
July 5th, 2007 at 7:29 pmTracy…The American people will not sacrifice their blood and treasure for an Iraqi Govt. that dithers away its time, not doing much of anything for years to come, while .America’s own needs remain unmet.
July 5th, 2007 at 7:31 pmThe voters know it, congress and the senate know it, the military knows it . Even Bush must know it by now.
If we are still losing 100 brave American soldiers a month in November 2008 , the voters wrath will sweep all the “stay the course” republicans out of office with a thunderous roar.
Conservatron is a child molester? Hmmmmm…
July 5th, 2007 at 7:33 pmInteresting.
Here you’ve got rush limbaugh calling for the “liberal educators” to reinstitute the Fairness Doctrine:
“If you’re going to show this movie, you better show the Great Global Warming Swindle and put the other side to our kids out there.â€
When’s old fat-ass goebbels going to start putting some of that “fair & balanced” liberal viewpoint on his propaganda program?
July 5th, 2007 at 7:42 pmDoes anyone anywhere believe that Rush Limbaugh offers anything but Conservative Masterbation on his show?
July 5th, 2007 at 7:47 pmLimbaugh is a moron, and I feel sorry for the kid.
July 5th, 2007 at 7:54 pmSounds like Rush was trying to equate liberals with terrorists in the mind of the boy.
I guess it got that from Bush/Cheney’s 2006 pre-election speeches.
July 5th, 2007 at 7:55 pm“13 yr old caller”
- from Rush’s basement dungeon to you
Looks like Limpdick decided to bring home a souvenir from the Dominican Republic
July 5th, 2007 at 8:01 pm“And after all that al Qaeda grew in strength and sophistication to the point that we now have so many former operatives, financiers, and planners in custody that have to have special prison around the world to hold them all.
Comment by Tracy — July 5, 2007 @ 6:41 pm”
Right, and pigs can fly too…..
July 5th, 2007 at 8:21 pm“What specific counter terrorism military actions are you referring to? You aren’t referring to wiretapping….are you?
Comment by Tracy — July 5, 2007 @ 7:08 pm”
Nice way to take only a portion of my comment and try and make it out to be something else…..
If memory serves this was in regards to the president simply going off and using the military without consulting the Congress….
But since you brought it up….. Domestic WIRETAPPING is ILLEGAL!
Don’t even try and say that it is for FOREIGN communications.. That is total BULL……
We already know from the AT&T court case in progress that Bush contacted them only 3 weeks after being in office…… This is a CLEAR intent to spy on AMERICANS……
July 5th, 2007 at 8:25 pm“Considering the Iraqis can’t do much of anything in the way of governing themselves and it’s been years now, I would say that embassy is probably going to be necessary….for a long time.
Comment by Tracy — July 5, 2007 @ 7:13 pm”
I see…. So when we OCCUPY a country, it is perfectly OK for us to create a CITY that is bigger than the Vatican and continue to say that we are not going to stay……
RIGHT!!!
So then if China came to the US and took OK and constructed a large wall around the state, and they say that we will only be here a few years, would YOU believe them?
July 5th, 2007 at 8:27 pm“He took those responsible out with Hellfire missle in Yemen.
http://archives.cnn.com/ 2002/ WORLD/ meast/ 11/ 04/ yemen.blast/ index.html
I wonder what else responses in your post is inaccurate.
Comment by Tracy — July 5, 2007 @ 6:45 pm”
So you believe what is told to you????
How do YOU know that in fact those targets were in that car? How do you know that the people stated were in that car? How do you know that this was not just a story to grab support, and the car was filled with INNOCENT people???
You might want to wipe your chin….. That kool aid is dripping all over from it….
July 5th, 2007 at 8:32 pmThat poor dumb kid hasn’t got a chance.
Comment by Zooey — July 5, 2007 @ 4:01 pm
Chance of what? Ending up as part of the Democrat base, sucking the tit of the taxpayer?
July 5th, 2007 at 9:57 pmSounds like Rush was trying to equate liberals with terrorists in the mind of the boy.
Comment by joeycollins — July 5, 2007 @ 7:55 pm
Better for him to learn about it now than be shell-shocked by his pro-terrorist, Stalinist college professors.
July 5th, 2007 at 10:01 pmI would hate to be Patrick’s teacher. Can you imagine parent-teacher conferences?
July 5th, 2007 at 10:35 pmNot all Democrats are felons but all felons are Democrats
July 5th, 2007 at 11:07 pmHe is a dumb, fat Tokyo Rose. Keep playing his antics. It is perfect pire music. Bring it on as they say, in fact…
July 5th, 2007 at 11:18 pmAsk anyone West of the Mississippi today if global warming is a reality. Perhaps Limbaugh can find some dumb recruits in LV today – it was near 120 at midday.
July 5th, 2007 at 11:23 pmSounds like Rush was trying to equate liberals with terrorists in the mind of the boy.
Comment by joeycollins — July 5, 2007 @ 7:55 pm
Yeah, and…?
July 5th, 2007 at 11:58 pmHow long will it be before the party of Cheney/Bush realizes that “liberal news outlets” like Time and Newsweek and the “liberal schools” are just a front for Al Queda in the US?
Who will the insurgents be then? Gray haired librarians lobbing hand grenades. Balding Earth Science teachers launching suicide bomb attacks. School nurses training our babies for war against the state. Oh, the humanity.
July 6th, 2007 at 12:20 amSomebody must Protect Children from the Abuse of Liberalism a relgion that is forced on Children in the Government School .
July 6th, 2007 at 12:47 amSomebody must Protect Children from the Abuse of Liberalism a relgion that is forced on Children in the Government School .
Comment by F(oolish)D(irty)R(epublican)
Since there seems to be only one “Government School” according to your writing, getting children out of this one school shouldn’t be so hard. And where do you propose to send the remaining children to school, F(oolish)D(irty)R(epublican)? The posters here who have boasted on TP bout their private school education, like michael and VileVenus, make spelling and grammar mistakes galore, just like you. Maybe the problem is with the student and his/her parents and not the school.
July 6th, 2007 at 2:17 amTime is as liberal a magazine as Bush is a president with sensible policies. If Time was a liberal magazine, Bush would have been impeached by now. The real battle of ideas that’s going on between left and right is the battle between those people who believe we’re all in the same boat and we should SHARE ideas, info, music, art… and those people who believe they are in this ALONE and can trust nobody, they feel they’re in a war of individuals, a war of one against the world. They think they need no one to go through life and they refuse to give credit to anyone else but themselves for all the blessings they get.
July 6th, 2007 at 5:46 amhere are liberals everywhere. You may think that just because your town is conservative — there are liberals. They’re hiding in the shadows, and they are lurking there, and they’re around and the odds are that many of them are in the school system
Liberals are like sex offenders they lurk in the shadows
July 6th, 2007 at 7:43 amLiberals are like sex offenders they lurk in the shadows
Comment by Edward R Olbermann
Here is a list from 2005 of some prominent Republican/neo-con sex offenders. Of course, since then we’ve seen, among other things, Rev. Ted Haggart’s tearful confession about consorting with a male hooker, Mark Foley forced to resign because of his attempts to seduce underaged House pages, and the GOP mayor of Spokane, WA also forced to resign over his using his official office computer to try to solicit teenaged boys.
Republican anti-abortion activist Howard Scott Heldreth is a convicted child rapist in Florida.
Republican County Commissioner David Swartz pleaded guilty to molesting two girls under the age of 11 and was sentenced to 8 years in prison.
Republican judge Mark Pazuhanich pleaded no contest to fondling a 10-year old girl and was sentenced to 10 years probation.
Republican anti-abortion activist Nicholas Morency pleaded guilty to possessing child pornography on his computer and offering a bounty to anybody who murders an abortion doctor.
Republican legislator Edison Misla Aldarondo was sentenced to 10 years in prison for raping his daughter between the ages of 9 and 17.
Republican Mayor Philip Giordano is serving a 37-year sentence in federal prison for sexually abusing 8- and 10-year old girls.
Republican campaign consultant Tom Shortridge was sentenced to three years probation for taking nude photographs of a 15-year old girl.
Republican racist pedophile and United States Senator Strom Thurmond had sex with a 15-year old black girl which produced a child.
Republican pastor Mike Hintz, whom George W. Bush commended during the 2004 presidential campaign, surrendered to police after admitting to a sexual affair with a female juvenile.
Republican legislator Peter Dibble pleaded no contest to having an inappropriate relationship with a 13-year-old girl.
*Republican activist Lawrence E. King, Jr. organized child sex parties at the White House during the 1980s.
*Republican lobbyist Craig J. Spence organized child sex parties at the White House during the 1980s.
Republican Congressman Donald “Buz” Lukens was found guilty of having sex with a female minor and sentenced to one month in jail.
Republican fundraiser Richard A. Delgaudio was found guilty of child porn charges and paying two teenage girls to pose for sexual photos.
Republican activist Mark A. Grethen convicted on six counts of sex crimes involving children.
Republican activist Randal David Ankeney pleaded guilty to attempted sexual assault on a child.
Republican Congressman Dan Crane had sex with a female minor working as a congressional page.
Republican activist and Christian Coalition leader Beverly Russell admitted to an incestuous relationship with his step daughter.
Republican governor Arnold Schwarzenegger allegedly had sex with a 16 year old girl when he was 28.
*Republican congressman and anti-gay activist Robert Bauman was charged with having sex with a 16-year-old boy he picked up at a gay bar.
Republican Committee Chairman Jeffrey Patti was arrested for distributing a video clip of a 5-year-old girl being raped.
Republican activist Marty Glickman (a.k.a. “Republican Marty”), was taken into custody by Florida police on four counts of unlawful sexual activity with an underage girl and one count of delivering the drug LSD.
*Republican legislative aide Howard L. Brooks was charged with molesting a 12-year old boy and possession of child pornography.
Republican Senate candidate John Hathaway was accused of having sex with his 12-year old baby sitter and withdrew his candidacy after the allegations were reported in the media.
*Republican preacher Stephen White, who demanded a return to traditional values, was sentenced to jail after offering $20 to a 14-year-old boy for permission to perform oral sex on him.
Republican talk show host Jon Matthews pleaded guilty to exposing his genitals to an 11 year old girl.
Republican anti-gay activist Earl “Butch” Kimmerling was sentenced to 40 years in prison for molesting an 8-year old girl after he attempted to stop a gay couple from adopting her.
Republican Party leader Paul Ingram pleaded guilty to six counts of raping his daughters and served 14 years in federal prison.
Republican election board official Kevin Coan was sentenced to two years probation for soliciting sex over the internet from a 14-year old girl.
*Republican politician Andrew Buhr was charged with two counts of first degree sodomy with a 13-year old boy.
Republican politician Keith Westmoreland was arrested on seven felony counts of lewd and lascivious exhibition to girls under the age of 16 (i.e. exposing himself to children).
Republican anti-abortion activist John Allen Burt was charged with sexual misconduct involving a 15-year old girl.
*Republican County Councilman Keola Childs pleaded guilty to molesting a male child.
Republican activist John Butler was charged with criminal sexual assault on a teenage girl.
Republican candidate Richard Gardner admitted to molesting his two daughters.
Republican Councilman and former Marine Jack W. Gardner was convicted of molesting a 13-year old girl.
*Republican County Commissioner Merrill Robert Barter pleaded guilty to unlawful sexual contact and assault on a teenage boy.
Republican City Councilman Fred C. Smeltzer, Jr. pleaded no contest to raping a 15 year-old girl and served 6-months in prison.
Republican activist Parker J. Bena pleaded guilty to possession of child pornography on his home computer and was sentenced to 30 months in federal prison and fined $18,000.
Republican parole board officer and former Colorado state representative, Larry Jack Schwarz, was fired after child pornography was found in his possession.
*Republican strategist and Citadel Military College graduate Robin Vanderwall was convicted in Virginia on five counts of soliciting sex from boys and girls over the internet.
Republican city councilman Mark Harris, who is described as a “good military man” and “church goer,” was convicted of repeatedly having sex with an 11-year-old girl and sentenced to 12 years in prison.
Republican businessman Jon Grunseth withdrew his candidacy for Minnesota governor after allegations surfaced that he went swimming in the nude with four underage girls, including his daughter.
Republican director of the “Young Republican Federation” Nicholas Elizondo molested his 6-year old daughter and was sentenced to six years in prison.
Republican benefactor of conservative Christian groups, Richard A. Dasen Sr., was charged with rape for allegedly paying a 15-year old girl for sex. Dasen, 62, who is married with grown children and several grandchildren, has allegedly told police that over the past decade he paid more than $1 million to have sex with a large number of young women.
And, by the way, Mr. Bigoted Ignoramus, there has never been any explanation for the many visits to the WH by gay hooker/phony journalist on days when no press conferences were scheduled. GOP=GrotesqueOldPerverts.
July 6th, 2007 at 8:44 am“Watching” propaganda? Too bad the kids not aware he’s LISTENING to propaganda.
July 6th, 2007 at 10:23 am#236
Comment by RemoveBush — July 5, 2007 @ 8:25 pm
“If memory serves this was in regards to the president simply going off and using the military without consulting the Congress….”
The invasion of Afghanistan and invasion of Iraq was done without the consent of Congress?
“But since you brought it up….. Domestic WIRETAPPING is ILLEGAL!”
You can get a warrant from FISA to do it. The NSA can do it even before the warrant is issued. The local large city police departments do it all the time as does the FBI on a regular basis.
“This is a CLEAR intent to spy on AMERICANS……”
The intent was to track terrorists inside the U.S. The U.S. government doesn’t care what YOU are up to….I hope.
July 6th, 2007 at 10:26 amComment by Lora — July 6, 2007 @ 8:44 am
Do any of those people belong to my organization, NAMBLA?
You know the group that advocates legalizing pedophilia and is represented by the ACLU, beloved by the left as the great defenders of liberty.
Rather than offer a list that would blow yours away (Clinton’s perverted misdeeds alone might’ve done it), let’s just recognize that only one party defends, advocates and actively promotes legalizing pedophilia.
And it’s your party.
July 6th, 2007 at 10:27 amAsk anyone West of the Mississippi today if global warming is a reality. Perhaps Limbaugh can find some dumb recruits in LV today – it was near 120 at midday.
Comment by Later… — July 5, 2007 @ 11:23 pm
And have you noticed that as each day goes by, the temperature seems to rise a little bit more?
July 6th, 2007 at 10:31 am#237
Comment by RemoveBush — July 5, 2007 @ 8:27 pm
“So when we OCCUPY a country, it is perfectly OK for us to create a CITY that is bigger than the Vatican and continue to say that we are not going to stay……”
With your “size being an issue” logic then we better shut down all of our embassies around the world because ALL of the are occupying another country. Oh wait, it’s COMMON knowledge that a U.S. embassy in another country is soverign U.S. territory. BTW we have air bases that are in Europe and S. Korea right now that are far larger than the U.S. Embassy in Iraq. Ever hear heard of Ramstein or Osan airbases? Both are well over 1000 acres each while the U.S. Embassy in Iraq is about 104 acres.
July 6th, 2007 at 10:44 am#238
“So you believe what is told to you????”
I have dozens of new agencies from around the world that say you are full of crap and for you to suggest that those hit by that missle were not those intended to be hit shows your zombie like mentality drilled into your brain from the illegitimate sources you get your news from. Where is YOUR evidence to the contrary?
Hell, here is one of those illegitimate news sources contradicting you directly:
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines02/1108-05.htm
BTW You must also be one of those who believe that 9/11 was an inside job by the U.S. government. Pathetic.
July 6th, 2007 at 10:55 amComment by Lora — July 6, 2007 @ 8:44 am
Does anybody on that list belong to my organization, NAMBLA?
You know, NAMBLA, the group that advocates the legalization of pedophilia and is represented by the ACLU, the left’s great champion of freedom and liberty?
Rather than put up a competing list of perverts (and Bill Clinton alone rivals your list), let’s just recognize which party it is that celebrates deviancy and perversion, wants to indoctrinate five-year olds with “alternative” lifestyle propaganda and defends and promotes perverted groups like NAMBLA.
July 6th, 2007 at 11:10 amparty lol
July 6th, 2007 at 3:17 pmAl Gore is causing global warming with all of his hot air!
July 6th, 2007 at 4:45 pmRather than offer a list that would blow yours away (Clinton’s perverted misdeeds alone might’ve done it), let’s just recognize that only one party defends, advocates and actively promotes legalizing pedophilia.
Comment by Peter Melzer aka Barney frankenstein
Clinton’s affairs were with adult women–something you probably don’t know much about. You don’t offer a similar list, because you can’t. Show us where the Democratic Pary has supported legalizing pedophilia, or else keep your filthy thoughts to yourself.
July 6th, 2007 at 6:09 pmBe scared, little boy, that’s what we repubs do! Be scared! Shh! Scary!
July 6th, 2007 at 7:02 pm