<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Court dismisses suit challenging Bush&#8217;s wiretapping.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/06/court-dismisses-suit-challenging-bushs-wiretapping/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/06/court-dismisses-suit-challenging-bushs-wiretapping/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 23:33:18 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Publicus</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/06/court-dismisses-suit-challenging-bushs-wiretapping/comment-page-3/#comment-3915194</link>
		<dc:creator>Publicus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 01:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/06/court-dismisses-suit-challenging-bushs-wiretapping/#comment-3915194</guid>
		<description>Once the American people realize what &quot;unalienable rights&quot; are, and that they have them, they won&#039;t be happy about what this court has ruled.

It may take time, but the people will figure it out...right after the criminals in power do their inevitable &quot;overreach.&quot; Happens to tyrants every time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once the American people realize what &#8220;unalienable rights&#8221; are, and that they have them, they won&#8217;t be happy about what this court has ruled.</p>
<p>It may take time, but the people will figure it out&#8230;right after the criminals in power do their inevitable &#8220;overreach.&#8221; Happens to tyrants every time&#8230;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3915194', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zooey</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/06/court-dismisses-suit-challenging-bushs-wiretapping/comment-page-3/#comment-3915123</link>
		<dc:creator>Zooey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 00:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/06/court-dismisses-suit-challenging-bushs-wiretapping/#comment-3915123</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Bill Clinton already tried a form of thatâ€“the stolen FBI files on Republican opponents.
Comment by Craig Livingstone&lt;/em&gt;

Prove it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Bill Clinton already tried a form of thatâ€“the stolen FBI files on Republican opponents.<br />
Comment by Craig Livingstone</em></p>
<p>Prove it.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3915123', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mycelium</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/06/court-dismisses-suit-challenging-bushs-wiretapping/comment-page-3/#comment-3914787</link>
		<dc:creator>Mycelium</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 22:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/06/court-dismisses-suit-challenging-bushs-wiretapping/#comment-3914787</guid>
		<description>Bill Clinton already tried a form of thatâ€“the stolen FBI files on Republican opponents.  
 Comment by Craig Livingstone â€” July 6, 2007 @ 6:23 pm

Could you post a link to that one?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill Clinton already tried a form of thatâ€“the stolen FBI files on Republican opponents.<br />
 Comment by Craig Livingstone â€” July 6, 2007 @ 6:23 pm</p>
<p>Could you post a link to that one?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3914787', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Livingstone</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/06/court-dismisses-suit-challenging-bushs-wiretapping/comment-page-3/#comment-3914768</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Livingstone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 22:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/06/court-dismisses-suit-challenging-bushs-wiretapping/#comment-3914768</guid>
		<description>Donâ€™t worry! When a Democrat is voted into the White House, they can use the â€œwarrantless domestic spying programâ€ to spy on the Republicans to make sure they donâ€™t get elected ever again!

Iâ€™m sure the Republicans will support this use of their plans!

Comment by Democrat Soldier â€” July 6, 2007 @ 11:14 am

Bill Clinton already tried a form of that--the stolen FBI files on Republican opponents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donâ€™t worry! When a Democrat is voted into the White House, they can use the â€œwarrantless domestic spying programâ€ to spy on the Republicans to make sure they donâ€™t get elected ever again!</p>
<p>Iâ€™m sure the Republicans will support this use of their plans!</p>
<p>Comment by Democrat Soldier â€” July 6, 2007 @ 11:14 am</p>
<p>Bill Clinton already tried a form of that&#8211;the stolen FBI files on Republican opponents.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3914768', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mycelium</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/06/court-dismisses-suit-challenging-bushs-wiretapping/comment-page-3/#comment-3914745</link>
		<dc:creator>Mycelium</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 22:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/06/court-dismisses-suit-challenging-bushs-wiretapping/#comment-3914745</guid>
		<description>Crumps Illegitimate Sonâ€¦

Youâ€™re a â€œGreat Americanâ€ and mega dittoâ€™s to you for showing us liberals a thing or two! (Your rhetoric gives you away ditto head.) 

Now please stay the eff outta here. (Looks like heâ€™s gone for now.)  Iâ€™m not the only one sick of the trolls derailing every topic. 

Just love how folks like CIS lump us â€œlibtardsâ€ into an imagined group. If youâ€™re still monitoring this thread CISâ€¦this â€œliberalâ€ is a union Steamfitter whom probably works harder in one day than you do in a month under conditions that would make most men $hit. (180â€™ in the air at times with danger everywhere all the time.) Be careful with your stereotypes ditto headâ€¦us liberals are everywhere.

About your welfare rantâ€¦stop it. Corporate welfare as 20 times the problem as â€œhumanâ€ welfare. Wanna debate costs? Look, I grew up in the lower east-side of Detroit. Not easy for a â€œwhite boyâ€. Many in my old neighborhood barely get by with the help of welfare. Most are old or otherwise truly unable to work. (If a decent job can be found that is). Contrary to your twisted idea of welfare CISâ€¦there is no pride in being on welfare- even in the ghetto. Have you ever actually known anyone on welfare?

Back on topicâ€¦?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crumps Illegitimate Sonâ€¦</p>
<p>Youâ€™re a â€œGreat Americanâ€ and mega dittoâ€™s to you for showing us liberals a thing or two! (Your rhetoric gives you away ditto head.) </p>
<p>Now please stay the eff outta here. (Looks like heâ€™s gone for now.)  Iâ€™m not the only one sick of the trolls derailing every topic. </p>
<p>Just love how folks like CIS lump us â€œlibtardsâ€ into an imagined group. If youâ€™re still monitoring this thread CISâ€¦this â€œliberalâ€ is a union Steamfitter whom probably works harder in one day than you do in a month under conditions that would make most men $hit. (180â€™ in the air at times with danger everywhere all the time.) Be careful with your stereotypes ditto headâ€¦us liberals are everywhere.</p>
<p>About your welfare rantâ€¦stop it. Corporate welfare as 20 times the problem as â€œhumanâ€ welfare. Wanna debate costs? Look, I grew up in the lower east-side of Detroit. Not easy for a â€œwhite boyâ€. Many in my old neighborhood barely get by with the help of welfare. Most are old or otherwise truly unable to work. (If a decent job can be found that is). Contrary to your twisted idea of welfare CISâ€¦there is no pride in being on welfare- even in the ghetto. Have you ever actually known anyone on welfare?</p>
<p>Back on topicâ€¦?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3914745', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod Serling</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/06/court-dismisses-suit-challenging-bushs-wiretapping/comment-page-3/#comment-3914733</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod Serling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 22:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/06/court-dismisses-suit-challenging-bushs-wiretapping/#comment-3914733</guid>
		<description>Comment by RemoveBush â€” July 6, 2007 @ 4:52 pm

&lt;i&gt;You are travelling through another dimension, a dimension not only of sight and sound but of mind; a journey into a wondrous land whose boundaries are that of imagination. Your next stop the Twilight Zone...&lt;/i&gt;

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHA!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment by RemoveBush â€” July 6, 2007 @ 4:52 pm</p>
<p><i>You are travelling through another dimension, a dimension not only of sight and sound but of mind; a journey into a wondrous land whose boundaries are that of imagination. Your next stop the Twilight Zone&#8230;</i></p>
<p>BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHA!!!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3914733', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troll</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/06/court-dismisses-suit-challenging-bushs-wiretapping/comment-page-3/#comment-3914520</link>
		<dc:creator>Troll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 21:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/06/court-dismisses-suit-challenging-bushs-wiretapping/#comment-3914520</guid>
		<description>Can you say Judicial tyrany. I think you can. This is what we get for allowing the courts so much power.

Government is the enemy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you say Judicial tyrany. I think you can. This is what we get for allowing the courts so much power.</p>
<p>Government is the enemy.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3914520', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RemoveBush</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/06/court-dismisses-suit-challenging-bushs-wiretapping/comment-page-3/#comment-3914298</link>
		<dc:creator>RemoveBush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 20:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/06/court-dismisses-suit-challenging-bushs-wiretapping/#comment-3914298</guid>
		<description>â€œ&lt;em&gt;First I wanna see your â€œproofâ€ of UFOs from other galaxies.

BWWWWWWWWAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Comment by Rod Serling â€” July 6, 2007 @ 4:45 pm&lt;/em&gt;â€

I&#039;ll make it extremely easy for you.......

Explain how Barbara Olson used a AIR PHONE to make a collect call when they were DEACTIVATED on 1/28/2001????? Don&#039;t say she used her cell phone because 1) they don&#039;t work going that fast or that high 2) Ted Olson said she called collect..... Why would she call collect from a cell phone?????

I&#039;ll wait for your NON answer!!!

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/AA757AMM.html
The passenger phone system was DEACTIVATED on 1/28/2001!!!!! No calls from these systems could have been made! Cell phones would NOT work at that altitude or speed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>â€œ<em>First I wanna see your â€œproofâ€ of UFOs from other galaxies.</p>
<p>BWWWWWWWWAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!</p>
<p>Comment by Rod Serling â€” July 6, 2007 @ 4:45 pm</em>â€</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll make it extremely easy for you&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>Explain how Barbara Olson used a AIR PHONE to make a collect call when they were DEACTIVATED on 1/28/2001????? Don&#8217;t say she used her cell phone because 1) they don&#8217;t work going that fast or that high 2) Ted Olson said she called collect&#8230;.. Why would she call collect from a cell phone?????</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll wait for your NON answer!!!</p>
<p><a href="http://pilotsfor911truth.org/AA757AMM.html" rel="nofollow">http://pilotsfor911truth.org/AA757AMM.html</a><br />
The passenger phone system was DEACTIVATED on 1/28/2001!!!!! No calls from these systems could have been made! Cell phones would NOT work at that altitude or speed.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3914298', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RemoveBush</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/06/court-dismisses-suit-challenging-bushs-wiretapping/comment-page-3/#comment-3914284</link>
		<dc:creator>RemoveBush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 20:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/06/court-dismisses-suit-challenging-bushs-wiretapping/#comment-3914284</guid>
		<description>&quot;&lt;em&gt;First I wanna see your â€œproofâ€ of UFOs from other galaxies.

BWWWWWWWWAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Comment by Rod Serling â€” July 6, 2007 @ 4:45 pm&lt;/em&gt;&quot;

STAWMAN!!!!

When they have NOTHING they try to deflect!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<em>First I wanna see your â€œproofâ€ of UFOs from other galaxies.</p>
<p>BWWWWWWWWAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!</p>
<p>Comment by Rod Serling â€” July 6, 2007 @ 4:45 pm</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>STAWMAN!!!!</p>
<p>When they have NOTHING they try to deflect!!!!!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3914284', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod Serling</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/06/court-dismisses-suit-challenging-bushs-wiretapping/comment-page-3/#comment-3914259</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod Serling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 20:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/06/court-dismisses-suit-challenging-bushs-wiretapping/#comment-3914259</guid>
		<description>I see you FAILED to dispute the PROOF I providedâ€¦..

Comment by RemoveBush â€” July 6, 2007 @ 4:32 pm

First I wanna see your &quot;proof&quot; of UFOs from other galaxies.  

BWWWWWWWWAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see you FAILED to dispute the PROOF I providedâ€¦..</p>
<p>Comment by RemoveBush â€” July 6, 2007 @ 4:32 pm</p>
<p>First I wanna see your &#8220;proof&#8221; of UFOs from other galaxies.  </p>
<p>BWWWWWWWWAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3914259', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RemoveBush</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/06/court-dismisses-suit-challenging-bushs-wiretapping/comment-page-3/#comment-3914189</link>
		<dc:creator>RemoveBush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 20:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/06/court-dismisses-suit-challenging-bushs-wiretapping/#comment-3914189</guid>
		<description>&quot;&lt;em&gt;No, what you have is a mental condition.

But itâ€™s amusing listening to you lose your sh-t. By all means, keep on blathering!

Comment by Rod Serling â€” July 6, 2007 @ 4:19 pm&lt;/em&gt;&quot;

I guess to the UNEDUCATED it would be a &quot;mental condition&quot;.......

When you learn to stop dragging your knuckles, let me know!

I see you FAILED to dispute the PROOF I provided.....

You are definately a Repub...... Facts are lies, and lies are facts in your world....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<em>No, what you have is a mental condition.</p>
<p>But itâ€™s amusing listening to you lose your sh-t. By all means, keep on blathering!</p>
<p>Comment by Rod Serling â€” July 6, 2007 @ 4:19 pm</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>I guess to the UNEDUCATED it would be a &#8220;mental condition&#8221;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>When you learn to stop dragging your knuckles, let me know!</p>
<p>I see you FAILED to dispute the PROOF I provided&#8230;..</p>
<p>You are definately a Repub&#8230;&#8230; Facts are lies, and lies are facts in your world&#8230;.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3914189', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod Serling</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/06/court-dismisses-suit-challenging-bushs-wiretapping/comment-page-3/#comment-3914131</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod Serling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 20:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/06/court-dismisses-suit-challenging-bushs-wiretapping/#comment-3914131</guid>
		<description>Comment by RemoveBush â€” July 6, 2007 @ 3:49 pm

I have the physics and evidence to support what I sayâ€¦

No, what you have is a mental condition.  

But it&#039;s amusing listening to you lose your sh-t.  By all means, keep on blathering!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment by RemoveBush â€” July 6, 2007 @ 3:49 pm</p>
<p>I have the physics and evidence to support what I sayâ€¦</p>
<p>No, what you have is a mental condition.  </p>
<p>But it&#8217;s amusing listening to you lose your sh-t.  By all means, keep on blathering!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3914131', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RemoveBush</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/06/court-dismisses-suit-challenging-bushs-wiretapping/comment-page-3/#comment-3913974</link>
		<dc:creator>RemoveBush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 19:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/06/court-dismisses-suit-challenging-bushs-wiretapping/#comment-3913974</guid>
		<description>&quot;&lt;em&gt;Cue â€˜Twighlight Zoneâ€™ music.

Let them keep talking, so that the world may know them.

Comment by Rod Serling â€” July 6, 2007 @ 3:38 pm&lt;/em&gt;&quot;

I have the physics and evidence to support what I say..... DO YOU???

http://www.pilotsfor911truth.org/

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/AA757AMM.html
The passenger phone system was DEACTIVATED on 1/28/2001!!!!! No calls from these systems could have been made! Cell phones would NOT work at that altitude or speed.

http://www.ae911truth.org/

Provide your evidence......

While your at it.... Please explain how cars can be burned, but only the metal, several blocks away from the WTC collapse????? What would cause that for a &quot;natural&quot; collapse??????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<em>Cue â€˜Twighlight Zoneâ€™ music.</p>
<p>Let them keep talking, so that the world may know them.</p>
<p>Comment by Rod Serling â€” July 6, 2007 @ 3:38 pm</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>I have the physics and evidence to support what I say&#8230;.. DO YOU???</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pilotsfor911truth.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.pilotsfor911truth.org/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://pilotsfor911truth.org/AA757AMM.html" rel="nofollow">http://pilotsfor911truth.org/AA757AMM.html</a><br />
The passenger phone system was DEACTIVATED on 1/28/2001!!!!! No calls from these systems could have been made! Cell phones would NOT work at that altitude or speed.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ae911truth.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ae911truth.org/</a></p>
<p>Provide your evidence&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>While your at it&#8230;. Please explain how cars can be burned, but only the metal, several blocks away from the WTC collapse????? What would cause that for a &#8220;natural&#8221; collapse??????<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3913974', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RemoveBush</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/06/court-dismisses-suit-challenging-bushs-wiretapping/comment-page-3/#comment-3913950</link>
		<dc:creator>RemoveBush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 19:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/06/court-dismisses-suit-challenging-bushs-wiretapping/#comment-3913950</guid>
		<description>&quot;&lt;em&gt;You talking about Clintonâ€™s FBI here? Or did Bush Sr. somehow know his son would become President 8 years later?

Comment by m12 â€” July 6, 2007 @ 3:35 pm&lt;/em&gt;&quot;

Yeah that would be the FBI working under Clinton.......

The FBI and CIA have been working on covert programs for a long time....

That is why I said there is more proof that someone OTHER than 19 Arabs performed 9/11.

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/OK/wtcbomb.html

Law-enforcement officials were told that terrorists were building a bomb that was eventually used to blow up the World Trade Center, and they planned to thwart the plotters by secretly substituting harmless powder for the explosives, an informer said after the blast.

The informer was to have helped the plotters build the bomb and supply the fake powder, but the plan was called off by an F.B.I. supervisor who had other ideas about how the informer, Emad Salem, should be used, the informer said.

The account, which is given in the transcript of hundreds of hours of tape recordings that Mr. Salem secretly made of his talks with law-enforcement agents, portrays the authorities as being in a far better position than previously known to foil the February 26th bombing of New York City&#039;s tallest towers.

The explosion left six people dead, more than a thousand people injured, and damages in excess of half-a-billion dollars. Four men are now on trial in Manhattan Federal Court [on charges of involvement] in that attack.

&lt;strong&gt;Mr. Salem, a 43-year-old former Egyptian Army officer, was used by the Government [of the United States] to penetrate a circle of Muslim extremists&lt;/strong&gt; who are now charged in two bombing cases: the World Trade Center attack, and a foiled plot to destroy the United Nations, the Hudson River tunnels, and other New York City landmarks. He is the crucial witness in the second bombing case, but his work for the Government was erratic, and for months before the World Trade Center blast, he was feuding with the F.B.I.

Supervisor `Messed It Up&#039;

After the bombing, he resumed his undercover work. In an undated transcript of a conversation from that period, Mr. Salem recounts a talk he had had earlier with an agent about an unnamed F.B.I. supervisor who, he said, &quot;came and messed it up.&quot;

&quot;He requested to meet me in the hotel,&quot; Mr. Salem says of the supervisor.

&quot;&lt;strong&gt;He requested to make me to testify, and if he didn&#039;t push for that, we&#039;ll be going building the bomb with a phony powder, and grabbing the people who was involved in it. But since you, we didn&#039;t do that.&lt;/strong&gt;&quot;

The transcript quotes Mr. Salem as saying that he wanted to complain to F.B.I. Headquarters in Washington about the Bureau&#039;s failure to stop the bombing, but was dissuaded by an agent identified as John Anticev.

Mr. Salem said Mr. Anticev had told him,

&quot;He said, I don&#039;t think that the New York people would like the things out of the New York Office to go to Washington, D.C.&quot;

Another agent, identified as Nancy Floyd, does not dispute Mr. Salem&#039;s account, but rather, appears to agree with it, saying of the `New York people&#039;:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<em>You talking about Clintonâ€™s FBI here? Or did Bush Sr. somehow know his son would become President 8 years later?</p>
<p>Comment by m12 â€” July 6, 2007 @ 3:35 pm</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah that would be the FBI working under Clinton&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>The FBI and CIA have been working on covert programs for a long time&#8230;.</p>
<p>That is why I said there is more proof that someone OTHER than 19 Arabs performed 9/11.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/OK/wtcbomb.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/OK/wtcbomb.html</a></p>
<p>Law-enforcement officials were told that terrorists were building a bomb that was eventually used to blow up the World Trade Center, and they planned to thwart the plotters by secretly substituting harmless powder for the explosives, an informer said after the blast.</p>
<p>The informer was to have helped the plotters build the bomb and supply the fake powder, but the plan was called off by an F.B.I. supervisor who had other ideas about how the informer, Emad Salem, should be used, the informer said.</p>
<p>The account, which is given in the transcript of hundreds of hours of tape recordings that Mr. Salem secretly made of his talks with law-enforcement agents, portrays the authorities as being in a far better position than previously known to foil the February 26th bombing of New York City&#8217;s tallest towers.</p>
<p>The explosion left six people dead, more than a thousand people injured, and damages in excess of half-a-billion dollars. Four men are now on trial in Manhattan Federal Court [on charges of involvement] in that attack.</p>
<p><strong>Mr. Salem, a 43-year-old former Egyptian Army officer, was used by the Government [of the United States] to penetrate a circle of Muslim extremists</strong> who are now charged in two bombing cases: the World Trade Center attack, and a foiled plot to destroy the United Nations, the Hudson River tunnels, and other New York City landmarks. He is the crucial witness in the second bombing case, but his work for the Government was erratic, and for months before the World Trade Center blast, he was feuding with the F.B.I.</p>
<p>Supervisor `Messed It Up&#8217;</p>
<p>After the bombing, he resumed his undercover work. In an undated transcript of a conversation from that period, Mr. Salem recounts a talk he had had earlier with an agent about an unnamed F.B.I. supervisor who, he said, &#8220;came and messed it up.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;He requested to meet me in the hotel,&#8221; Mr. Salem says of the supervisor.</p>
<p>&#8220;<strong>He requested to make me to testify, and if he didn&#8217;t push for that, we&#8217;ll be going building the bomb with a phony powder, and grabbing the people who was involved in it. But since you, we didn&#8217;t do that.</strong>&#8221;</p>
<p>The transcript quotes Mr. Salem as saying that he wanted to complain to F.B.I. Headquarters in Washington about the Bureau&#8217;s failure to stop the bombing, but was dissuaded by an agent identified as John Anticev.</p>
<p>Mr. Salem said Mr. Anticev had told him,</p>
<p>&#8220;He said, I don&#8217;t think that the New York people would like the things out of the New York Office to go to Washington, D.C.&#8221;</p>
<p>Another agent, identified as Nancy Floyd, does not dispute Mr. Salem&#8217;s account, but rather, appears to agree with it, saying of the `New York people&#8217;:<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3913950', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod Serling</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/06/court-dismisses-suit-challenging-bushs-wiretapping/comment-page-3/#comment-3913934</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod Serling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 19:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/06/court-dismisses-suit-challenging-bushs-wiretapping/#comment-3913934</guid>
		<description>Comment by RemoveBush â€” July 6, 2007 @ 3:22 pm

Cue &#039;Twighlight Zone&#039; music.

Let them keep talking, so that the world may know them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment by RemoveBush â€” July 6, 2007 @ 3:22 pm</p>
<p>Cue &#8216;Twighlight Zone&#8217; music.</p>
<p>Let them keep talking, so that the world may know them.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3913934', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: m12</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/06/court-dismisses-suit-challenging-bushs-wiretapping/comment-page-3/#comment-3913927</link>
		<dc:creator>m12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 19:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/06/court-dismisses-suit-challenging-bushs-wiretapping/#comment-3913927</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;If you would do some research, you would find that the 1993 WTC attack was performed by the FBI!!!!! They used an informant and provided him with the material and information for the bombing!!!! It is Public record since this was in a court of law!!!!!&lt;/i&gt;

You talking about Clinton&#039;s FBI here? Or did Bush Sr. somehow know his son would become President 8 years later?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If you would do some research, you would find that the 1993 WTC attack was performed by the FBI!!!!! They used an informant and provided him with the material and information for the bombing!!!! It is Public record since this was in a court of law!!!!!</i></p>
<p>You talking about Clinton&#8217;s FBI here? Or did Bush Sr. somehow know his son would become President 8 years later?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3913927', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: m12</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/06/court-dismisses-suit-challenging-bushs-wiretapping/comment-page-3/#comment-3913923</link>
		<dc:creator>m12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 19:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/06/court-dismisses-suit-challenging-bushs-wiretapping/#comment-3913923</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;No!!! Of course plans hit the towersâ€¦.. It has YET to be proven that it was the planes the govt. claimsâ€¦.. Also, there is more proof that the towers were Controlled Demolition, especially WTC7.&lt;/i&gt;

So what planes hit the towers, and who flew them? Where did flight 175 and 11 go if they did not hit the towers?

&lt;i&gt;I am saying that the plan could not have hit the pentagonâ€¦.. Pilots for 911 truth have the data from the NTSB and it PROVES the plan was 400+ ft above the freewayâ€¦â€¦. It could have NEVER hit the Pentagon!&lt;/i&gt;

So where did it go?

Even if you believed something about &#039;controlled demolishions&#039; was what caused the towers to collapse, Arabs still invaded our homeland, hijacked the planes, and killed hundreds of our citizens on impact!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>No!!! Of course plans hit the towersâ€¦.. It has YET to be proven that it was the planes the govt. claimsâ€¦.. Also, there is more proof that the towers were Controlled Demolition, especially WTC7.</i></p>
<p>So what planes hit the towers, and who flew them? Where did flight 175 and 11 go if they did not hit the towers?</p>
<p><i>I am saying that the plan could not have hit the pentagonâ€¦.. Pilots for 911 truth have the data from the NTSB and it PROVES the plan was 400+ ft above the freewayâ€¦â€¦. It could have NEVER hit the Pentagon!</i></p>
<p>So where did it go?</p>
<p>Even if you believed something about &#8216;controlled demolishions&#8217; was what caused the towers to collapse, Arabs still invaded our homeland, hijacked the planes, and killed hundreds of our citizens on impact!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3913923', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crump's Illegitimate Son</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/06/court-dismisses-suit-challenging-bushs-wiretapping/comment-page-3/#comment-3913920</link>
		<dc:creator>Crump's Illegitimate Son</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 19:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/06/court-dismisses-suit-challenging-bushs-wiretapping/#comment-3913920</guid>
		<description>Crumpâ€™s Illegitimate Son,



So I suppose you think that if unions went away now, that everything would be just fine. This is absolutely false. The goal of a company is to maximize proftis. What would stop companies from slashing worker benefits and pay in light of the extinction of unions. Oh thatâ€™s right, they already do that.

Funny how no one wants a trial lawyer around until their family is hurt severly by the gross neglingence of another. You want us to curb our access to court remedies? Asbestos, faulty prescriptions, or pool equipment so powerful it rips out girls intestines. http://www.nbc11.com/health/13626625/detail.html

you think these people should not have recourse? If they do, they can only retrieve so much right. What is your daughters intestinal track worth to you?

Forgove me if I donâ€™t feel sorry for oil industry. The most profitable industry in the history of the world. No sympathy here.

Comment by Crump&#039;s Brother â€” July 6, 2007 @ 2:28 pm

Crump, 

There&#039;s a difference between stating the unions have gone way overboard and hoping that they disappear altogether.  I don&#039;t wish them to disappear; do you not agree that they have gone too far in many cases?   

Similarly, only a liar, a dimwit or a Democrat can&#039;t see that the grotesque, greedy trial lawyers are nothing short of a legalized mafia.  It&#039;s one thing to undertake legitimate lawsuits for real damage caused by true negligence--like the the girl in the pool.  But let&#039;s be honest:  That&#039;s not REALLY what the ATLA is all about now, is it?

The greedy trial lawyers have taken to using bogus junk science to destroy legitimate, innocent companies, shaking down businesses with phony legal threats designed to force settlements out of fear of being bankrupted by legal bills, and attacking the deepest pockets regardless of culpability.  And never mind class action suits, where the greedy pigs get rich while the &quot;aggrieved party&quot; gets 20 cents.  They are in the &quot;business&quot; of concocting phony grievances, all designed to shakedown companies and/or the taxpayer.  It&#039;s a grotesque racket and they&#039;re no better than the mafia. 

And the whole racket is protected by a political party that gets a huge chunk of its funding from these pigs.  And while primarily a Democrat-protected racket, there are frankly too many Republicans taking trial lawyer protection money as well.  

As for the oil companies, I&#039;m not asking you to feel sorry for them--I&#039;m only suggesting you oughta stop whining about high prices when those prices are merely a reflection of: (1) the market; aggravated by (2) the policies of the Democrat party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crumpâ€™s Illegitimate Son,</p>
<p>So I suppose you think that if unions went away now, that everything would be just fine. This is absolutely false. The goal of a company is to maximize proftis. What would stop companies from slashing worker benefits and pay in light of the extinction of unions. Oh thatâ€™s right, they already do that.</p>
<p>Funny how no one wants a trial lawyer around until their family is hurt severly by the gross neglingence of another. You want us to curb our access to court remedies? Asbestos, faulty prescriptions, or pool equipment so powerful it rips out girls intestines. <a href="http://www.nbc11.com/health/13626625/detail.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nbc11.com/health/13626625/detail.html</a></p>
<p>you think these people should not have recourse? If they do, they can only retrieve so much right. What is your daughters intestinal track worth to you?</p>
<p>Forgove me if I donâ€™t feel sorry for oil industry. The most profitable industry in the history of the world. No sympathy here.</p>
<p>Comment by Crump&#8217;s Brother â€” July 6, 2007 @ 2:28 pm</p>
<p>Crump, </p>
<p>There&#8217;s a difference between stating the unions have gone way overboard and hoping that they disappear altogether.  I don&#8217;t wish them to disappear; do you not agree that they have gone too far in many cases?   </p>
<p>Similarly, only a liar, a dimwit or a Democrat can&#8217;t see that the grotesque, greedy trial lawyers are nothing short of a legalized mafia.  It&#8217;s one thing to undertake legitimate lawsuits for real damage caused by true negligence&#8211;like the the girl in the pool.  But let&#8217;s be honest:  That&#8217;s not REALLY what the ATLA is all about now, is it?</p>
<p>The greedy trial lawyers have taken to using bogus junk science to destroy legitimate, innocent companies, shaking down businesses with phony legal threats designed to force settlements out of fear of being bankrupted by legal bills, and attacking the deepest pockets regardless of culpability.  And never mind class action suits, where the greedy pigs get rich while the &#8220;aggrieved party&#8221; gets 20 cents.  They are in the &#8220;business&#8221; of concocting phony grievances, all designed to shakedown companies and/or the taxpayer.  It&#8217;s a grotesque racket and they&#8217;re no better than the mafia. </p>
<p>And the whole racket is protected by a political party that gets a huge chunk of its funding from these pigs.  And while primarily a Democrat-protected racket, there are frankly too many Republicans taking trial lawyer protection money as well.  </p>
<p>As for the oil companies, I&#8217;m not asking you to feel sorry for them&#8211;I&#8217;m only suggesting you oughta stop whining about high prices when those prices are merely a reflection of: (1) the market; aggravated by (2) the policies of the Democrat party.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3913920', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RemoveBush</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/06/court-dismisses-suit-challenging-bushs-wiretapping/comment-page-3/#comment-3913898</link>
		<dc:creator>RemoveBush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 19:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/06/court-dismisses-suit-challenging-bushs-wiretapping/#comment-3913898</guid>
		<description>&quot;&lt;em&gt;I have a question about your line of thinking, though, Mr. RemoveBush.

If party A owns the telephone data he transmits even if it is in party Bâ€™s phone, why can party B record the conversation (and Aâ€™s data) without notifying A?

Comment by m12 â€” July 6, 2007 @ 3:18 pm&lt;/em&gt;&quot;

First....... The govt. does not own party B&#039;s phone!!!!!!

Party B owns the phone!!!!

Your analogy is completly flawd and silly!!!!

If the phone junction box is sitting in my back yard, it does not give me the right to go out and connect my phone to various lines to listen in on...... Even though the box is in my back yard, which is my property, I still am not legally allowed to listen to those other lines.

This analogy is what is being discussed..... The box is in the US and Bush is trying to probe around until HE thinks he finds something..... THAT IS CALLED FISHING!!!!

I-T---I-S---I-L-L-E-G-A-L---!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<em>I have a question about your line of thinking, though, Mr. RemoveBush.</p>
<p>If party A owns the telephone data he transmits even if it is in party Bâ€™s phone, why can party B record the conversation (and Aâ€™s data) without notifying A?</p>
<p>Comment by m12 â€” July 6, 2007 @ 3:18 pm</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>First&#8230;&#8230;. The govt. does not own party B&#8217;s phone!!!!!!</p>
<p>Party B owns the phone!!!!</p>
<p>Your analogy is completly flawd and silly!!!!</p>
<p>If the phone junction box is sitting in my back yard, it does not give me the right to go out and connect my phone to various lines to listen in on&#8230;&#8230; Even though the box is in my back yard, which is my property, I still am not legally allowed to listen to those other lines.</p>
<p>This analogy is what is being discussed&#8230;.. The box is in the US and Bush is trying to probe around until HE thinks he finds something&#8230;.. THAT IS CALLED FISHING!!!!</p>
<p>I-T&#8212;I-S&#8212;I-L-L-E-G-A-L&#8212;!!!!!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3913898', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RemoveBush</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/06/court-dismisses-suit-challenging-bushs-wiretapping/comment-page-3/#comment-3913875</link>
		<dc:creator>RemoveBush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 19:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/06/court-dismisses-suit-challenging-bushs-wiretapping/#comment-3913875</guid>
		<description>&quot;&lt;em&gt;Are you saying that a plane never hit the twin towers and the eyewitnesses in New York are lying?&lt;/em&gt;&quot;

No!!! Of course plans hit the towers..... It has YET to be proven that it was the planes the govt. claims..... Also, there is more proof that the towers were Controlled Demolition, especially WTC7.

&quot;&lt;em&gt;Are you saying that the flight that (according to you) did not hit the Pentagon disappeared into thin air?&lt;/em&gt;&quot;

I am saying that the plan could not have hit the pentagon..... Pilots for 911 truth have the data from the NTSB and it PROVES the plan was 400+ ft above the freeway....... It could have NEVER hit the Pentagon!

&quot;&lt;em&gt;Are you saying that the eyewitnesses on flight 93 who described their attackers as Arabs were lying?&lt;/em&gt;&quot;

You mean those PHONE CALLS that COULD NOT HAVE BEEN MADE from cell phones??????

&quot;&lt;em&gt;Are you saying that Arabs never attacked the WTC in 1993? The embassies in 1998? Did Clinton fabricate those?&lt;/em&gt;&quot;

If you would do some research, you would find that the 1993 WTC attack was performed by the FBI!!!!! They used an informant and provided him with the material and information for the bombing!!!! It is Public record since this was in a court of law!!!!!

&quot;&lt;em&gt;But thank you for admitting we have enemies in the United States. That clearly qualifies as an invasion!

Comment by m12 â€” July 6, 2007 @ 3:09 pm&lt;/em&gt;&quot;

You IDIOT!!!!! The enemies are sitting at 1600 Pensylvania AVE in Washington DC!!!!!! The so called &quot;invasion&quot; is your stupidity at work.

Enemies can be foreign or DOMESTIC!!!!! I see you have never taken any oath of service for your country, or you would have known that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<em>Are you saying that a plane never hit the twin towers and the eyewitnesses in New York are lying?</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>No!!! Of course plans hit the towers&#8230;.. It has YET to be proven that it was the planes the govt. claims&#8230;.. Also, there is more proof that the towers were Controlled Demolition, especially WTC7.</p>
<p>&#8220;<em>Are you saying that the flight that (according to you) did not hit the Pentagon disappeared into thin air?</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>I am saying that the plan could not have hit the pentagon&#8230;.. Pilots for 911 truth have the data from the NTSB and it PROVES the plan was 400+ ft above the freeway&#8230;&#8230;. It could have NEVER hit the Pentagon!</p>
<p>&#8220;<em>Are you saying that the eyewitnesses on flight 93 who described their attackers as Arabs were lying?</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>You mean those PHONE CALLS that COULD NOT HAVE BEEN MADE from cell phones??????</p>
<p>&#8220;<em>Are you saying that Arabs never attacked the WTC in 1993? The embassies in 1998? Did Clinton fabricate those?</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>If you would do some research, you would find that the 1993 WTC attack was performed by the FBI!!!!! They used an informant and provided him with the material and information for the bombing!!!! It is Public record since this was in a court of law!!!!!</p>
<p>&#8220;<em>But thank you for admitting we have enemies in the United States. That clearly qualifies as an invasion!</p>
<p>Comment by m12 â€” July 6, 2007 @ 3:09 pm</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>You IDIOT!!!!! The enemies are sitting at 1600 Pensylvania AVE in Washington DC!!!!!! The so called &#8220;invasion&#8221; is your stupidity at work.</p>
<p>Enemies can be foreign or DOMESTIC!!!!! I see you have never taken any oath of service for your country, or you would have known that!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3913875', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
