Think Progress

Fox News: ‘Blame Mr. Rogers!’»

This morning, Fox and Friends asked, “Why is it at the end of every term, these kids who on the bubble…they come in and beg for extra credit so they can get an A?” Citing a report by a university professor, Fox speculated one possible answer: “Blame Mr. Rogers! Because Mr. Rogers had an optimistic message where everyone was special even if they didn’t deserve it.” During the segment, one chyron read: “Mr. Rogers’ Mixed Message: ‘You’re Special.’” Another chyron asked: “Is Mr. Rogers Ruining Kids?: Sense of Entitlement.” Watch it:

Screenshot

The late Fred Rogers was the highly acclaimed host of the children’s television show, Mr. Rogers’ Neighborhood, and was a tireless advocate for children. Fox’s Brian Kilmeade said “that man unintentionally did a whole generation or two a disservice.”

329







Sort Comments By: Top Rated | Date

329 Responses to “Fox News: ‘Blame Mr. Rogers!’”


  1. Zooey Says:

    Why are these lame-assed wankers digging up a dead man to spit on his body?

    Mr Rogers loved kids more than anyone.

    Jesus christ.


  2. Mr. President Says:

    Well, he is kind of a pussy!


  3. TwinPeaksForever Says:

    Ok. What literary archetype was Laura Palmer?


  4. Your Conscience Says:

    I noticed Iraq was not mentioned once………therefore it the segment was a SMASHING SUCCESS.

    Sleep Rape-Public-Can Sheeple…………..SLEEP.


  5. Arthur C. Says:

    Ha ha ha ha ha ha!

    How long till they start kicking Santa Claus too?


  6. Heather Slater Says:

    I feel only pity for people so dead inside that they do not think all children are “special”.


  7. Proud Dad Says:

    Mr. Rogers was the most kindest, gentlest soul and his message that every person was unique and special is true!

    Imagine the effect on children if we tell them they’re all dumb shits and they have nothing to offer.

    I can’t believe I’m posting this but Mr. Rogers is a great role model.


  8. Frank M Says:

    Heather: and just what makes all children “special”?


  9. Texas Democrat Says:

    Attacking the beloved dead, a new low.


  10. LandSurveyor Says:

    Stunningly weird.


  11. Texas Democrat Says:

    Frank M,

    Innocense, retard.


  12. Zooey Says:

    Fox has created The War on Mr Rogers!


  13. toasterhead Says:

    Heather: and just what makes all children “special”?

    Comment by Frank M — July 6, 2007 @ 4:53 pm

    Don’t take it personally, guy. I don’t think she meant it in the same way that you’re “special,” with the short bus and all.


  14. leftcoast Says:

    Don Chance, a finance professor at Louisiana State University is now a Childhood Development expert. FOX digs up all these off the wall, insecure and desperate-to-publish profs whenever it needs to find justification for their shit.


  15. Jimmy Z Says:

    Mr. Rogers was a dick in real life….but that doesn’t mean his message needs to be hijacked and distorted by Faux.


  16. Frank M Says:

    I thought you liberals were all against innocence.


  17. dorothy59 Says:

    #16 Do you have a citation?


  18. Bob Says:

    Can’t wait ’til they expose Big Bird for his lack of courage (he is yellow, afterall). The Count will be next for discouraging use of multiplication tables. Ernie and Bert are encouraging same-sex marriage. Don’t get me started on Elmo the Terrorist Supporter.

    FOX Sensationalism, the microphone-feedback of ‘What is Patriotism?’, is owned by an Austrailian. It’s entertainment, not “News”.


  19. stagemom Says:

    a child who feels special is not necessarily spoiled. that comes from the gratuitous excess of buying of toys.
    mister rogers did not believe in commercialism or crap culture, two hallmarks of big business.
    distraction brought to you by kkk rove.


  20. DRxJ Says:

    Well, he is kind of a pussy!
    Comment by Mr. President or whomever — July 6, 2007 @ 4:49 pm

    The host for Fox and Friends?
    I agree. To attack a dead man, who can’t defend himself!
    Class act, that Fox, class act!

    (SIDE NOTE: Taste of Chicago, here I come!!!)

    Enjoy the weekend, everyone!!!


  21. veritas Says:

    While we’re indulging in a game of “Fantasyland” (what would one expect from a fake news program like Fox??) why don’t we place blame on the whole bunch: Santa Claus, The Easter Bunny, Jimminy Crickett, Howdie Doody, and Princess SummerFallWinterSpring??

    I guess they have no one left to blame but fictitious characters because it’s beginning to look like they’ve distilled down to “blaming themselves” finally. Blaming a fictional character is essentially blaming themselves for all intents & purposes.


  22. Texas Democrat Says:

    Frank M,

    You thought?
    As usual you thought wrong.


  23. veritas Says:

    Well, since the entire american populace is engaged in a war on Foch Snooze, it’s only fitting that they lash out at fictitious boogeymen, isn’t it?


  24. RUCerious Says:

    Blame his sweaters.


  25. A. Cravan Says:

    #17: I thought you liberals were all against innocence.

    Oh? Why in heaven’s name would you think that?

    What a doughbrained thing to say.


  26. veritas Says:

    Within a year I believe Fox News will be so irrelevant and obsolete that they’ll just vanish completely from the radar. Right now, no with any sense of credibility or self-respect will appear on their programming which says a bunch.


  27. Dan Says:

    If any other station ran this story FOXNEWS would point out that Fred Rogers was an ordained minister and accuse them of an “Attack on Christianity”.


  28. Jimmy Z Says:

    #18 - I grew up in Pittsburgh. My mom knew a co-worker of Fred Rogers….he was an arrogant prick just like Bob Hope pretended not to be.


  29. veritas Says:

    If this is the best Fox news can do, methinks they’re in heap big trouble!


  30. RUCerious Says:

    Let’s not forget that Mr TopemHat of Sodor Island is a capitalist pig and fascist whose only interest is that the damn trains make sure they are being useful!


  31. veritas Says:

    This takes the cake, doesn’t it…..if they ever believed themselves to be a legitimate news program, this cinches the deal against that once and for all. They will never live this one down.

    Guess they had to run something to counter what’s happening today on all fronts….DeadEye Dick is looking like the storm is gathering all around him.


  32. Texas Democrat Says:

    I remember watching a show years ago that was something like “punked” where they set up Mr. Rogers in a hotel room where nothing was as he asked for it and nothing worked. The wrong bed in a smoking room with a television that didn’t work etc. etc. He took the whole thing with absolute grace and humility.
    Of course he’s being attacked, evil cannot tolerate purity.


  33. upside00 Says:

    We will have to fight Mr. Rogers in his grave or we will have to fight him here!

    Where’s glen beck and billo to kick the dead guy? They are missing out on all the fun. And Ann Coultergeist should be here, too. DNA-loaded skank cocktail dress and all.


  34. RUCerious Says:

    Jimmy Z ~ My mom played accordian for a hillbilly radio show in Des Moines Iowa in the late 30’s, starring none other than the biggest asshole in radio at that time, one Ronnie Reagan.


  35. veritas Says:

    Even bringing a second-rate station like Fox up for discussion makes me feel like barfing. Time to flit on to bigger and more relevant topics.


  36. RUCerious Says:

    upside00!
    ROFLMAO!!!


  37. dorothy59 Says:

    Since many FOX viewers raised their kids with Mr. Rogers, this might not be such a smart move.


  38. Frank M Says:

    If you are not against innocence why are you for stuff like sex before marriage, abortion and children without dads?


  39. SomeGaveAll Says:

    The Fox take on kindly Fred Rogers’ efforts to help preschoolers w/their sense of self esteem is beyond laughable. My grandsons love him. His program sure beats a lot of the dreck on commercial tv for kids that age. Rogers was a clergyman BTW.


  40. upside00 Says:

    #34 Veritas

    But remember… it is Faux NoNooz that blames terrorist attacks on national medicine! SO wonder what else they will blame Mr. Rogers for?


  41. Wayne Says:

    I thought
    Comment by Frank M

    Don’t hurt yourself there, dude.


  42. Ashen Shard Says:

    oh! this has to be the last straw! I doubt the public at large would allow such a slander of Mr. Rogers to stand. Heh, I’m willing to bet a large segment of the public grew up with Mr. Rogers.


  43. trippin Says:

    Professor Chance responded that he agreed that narcissism was a problem. No word on when he’s writing the article about this most heinous kind.

    ———————-

    Professor Chance,
    Mr. Zaslow,

    With respect to “Blame It on Mr. Rogers: Why Young Adults Feel So Entitled” published July 5:

    Many in America openly practice the narcissism that a supreme being who created the universe cares solely about this insignificant corner of an insignificant galaxy, and in fact this supreme being has nothing better to do than watch every move of each and every one of us from cradle to grave to determine our eternal disposition in the hereafter.

    Some extrapolate this to declare homo sapiens as “special,” above nature not part of it, separate, made in the image of that supreme being, to the point they readily sacrifice the precious natural surroundings that give us life in the pursuit of wealth, consequences be damned. They deny Federal funding for life altering research using embryonic stem cells, they deny a woman equal footing in society by denying her sovereignty over her own body, they deny Terri Schiavo a dignified and private passing, they demonize people for who they love, they seek to replace the rigors of scientific inquiry with tenets of faith in our schools as we increasingly fail to compete in a global economy, they fight cruel wars tantamount to modern day Crusades — all this and more, and all rooted in this narcissism run amok.

    Yet for all the incalculable damage that this narcissism has wrought, it elicits not a peep from vaunted financial services chairs at LSU nor the editorial staff of the Wall Street Journal.

    But let Mister Rogers — Mister Rogers, for crying out loud — show a developing child a little love, a child who has to rely on television to bolster a preschool education these same people would otherwise deny, and the mammonists go apoplectic.

    This makes Falwell’s ludicrous accusations that Tinky Winky is a gay role model pale by comparison. Evidently a positive self-image among the nation’s youth is the antithesis of oligarchic objectives, and must be repudiated no matter how ridiculous that repudiation.

    I must say, to your credit, at least this time it wasn’t Clinton’s fault.

    PS - Nice guitar page though, Dr. Chance.


  44. dorothy59 Says:

    #37 I’m not against children without dads, or children with dads. I’m not against any children.


  45. Tom3 Says:

    Now the Reich Wingnuts are smearing Fred Rodgers.

    They’ve gone insane.


  46. Mr. President Says:

    Alright, if no one else has the balls to say it, I will.

    Mr. Rogers was creepy, of course he thought all children were “special,” especially little boys.

    No one would want a “Mr. Rogers” in their neighborhood today, that is, no one who loves their children.


  47. A. Cravan Says:

    Harumphing con saps know what’s wrong with this country: Disney! Specifically, “Snow White and the 7 Dwarves”: a whole generation of children grew up thinking Americans should “whistle while you work”! How absurd!


  48. Jeremy Says:

    …I can’t think of a single thing to say to this. Wait…actually I can. I’m channelling a good buddy of mine here….here it comes….

    *DUMB$#!+!!!*

    Now I see where Mr. P gets his talking points from…


  49. RUCerious Says:

    Why is Frank J/M/? for pedophiles like Mark Foley?


  50. Texas Democrat Says:

    Frank M,

    We’re talking about Faux attacking Mr. Rogers on this thread. You asked a question about why children are special, it was answered, go elsewhere to bait people into your talking points. Or better yet go elsewhere to master bait people.


  51. ozma10 Says:

    The sense of entitlement has been growing in this country for MORE than 25 years. And narcissism???? Just look at the grand sense of entitlement going on at the White House, not to mention narcissism!!!!
    No Fox noisemaker is fit to shine the shoes of Fred Rogers. A selfless, dedicated man, whose goal in life was to offer children a place to be safe and to understand the world around them. And yes, he looked for the something special in everyone, even those noisemakers at Fox. Our world is so much better off because of him. The children are so much more in confusion and peril without his calm and loving friendship. I still watch the reruns with the kids. Sometimes without!!


  52. Frank M Says:

    RUCerious you make no sense.


  53. Texas Democrat Says:

    You black hearted evil trolls really have no shame do you.


  54. RUCerious Says:

    Frank J/M, neither do your strawmen.


  55. Zooey Says:

    If you are not against innocence why are you for stuff like sex before marriage, abortion and children without dads?
    Comment by Frank M — July 6, 2007 @ 5:05 pm

    Please do not venture out into the world unassisted.


  56. spit take Says:

    “Why is it at the end of every term, these kids who on the bubble…they come in and beg for extra credit so they can get an A?”

    Umm… maybe it’s because they know that an A is better than a B and, human nature being what it is, they want to do everything in their power to get the best grade possible? And they recognize that “begging for extra credit” is one way to achieve that goal?

    Is that so friggin’ hard to understand?

    Why does everything have to be an “entitlement” issue?

    How do they even try to turn this into a social problem, let alone hint that it’s anyone’s “fault”?


  57. Wayne Says:

    RUCerious you make no sense.
    Comment by Frank M

    It’s not his fault you have a reading comprehension problem…..


  58. veritas Says:

    And King George will be sitting alone on his throne (toilet throne, that is) with his only two friends left in the world: Barney and Laura - his two dogs. arfffff! Didn’t he prophesize that?


  59. LandSurveyor Says:

    Mr. President you sure say some weird stuff. I personally never liked Mr. Rogers. I was a Three Stooges kinda guy. But this thread is about the endless stream of weird shit that that FOX morning show puts out.

    I just read in Time Murdoch wants to buy the WSJ to go legit and eventually dump FOX. We all know where FOX is headed you dolt.


  60. Ringo Says:

    I’m conservative and I like Mr. Rogers.

    My 20 month old daughter watches his show almost everyday.


  61. veritas Says:

    Insanity is the synonym for “reichwingnuts” these days….so we’ve come to expect this behavior from the bunch of them.


  62. bob (not the hacker) Says:

    “If you are not against innocence why are you for stuff like sex before marriage, abortion and children without dads?”

    Comment by Frank M

    So, Frank, you’ve never had sex? It’s a shame your mom never had an abortion, and if you have kids take it for granted they would be better off without their dad.


  63. chimpeach Says:

    #17 Frank M

    I thought you liberals were all against innocence.

    I thought you conservatives were all pedophiles. Oh, that’s right. You are.


  64. spit take Says:

    and just what makes all children “special”?

    Comment by Frank M — July 6, 2007 @ 4:53 pm

    I guess a simple answer that you can understand is God makes all children “special”.

    What makes you say that there are children in the world who are not “special”? Do YOU have children? Are they special?


  65. LandSurveyor Says:

    Texas Democrat are you new here? Or is that a new handle you’re sporting?


  66. RUCerious Says:

    Why is it at the end of every term, these kids who on the bubble…they come in and beg for extra credit so they can get an A?”

    It isn’t like school should be about the learning, now is it?
    What’s wrong with allowing a student to work a little harder at something they need practice with to cement some learning in place.
    It’s not like they’re not ‘earning’ the extra credit.

    No, it’s about you, the almighty instructor, with the godlike power of issuing grades.


  67. veritas Says:

    Fox is headed out…..or more appropriately, down the toilet. It’s already there but just doesn’t realize it yet….”and away go bubbles down the drain, RotoRooter!”.


  68. veritas Says:

    It’s original, gotta admit that! After years of blaming Clinton, now they’ve found a new scapegoat….poor ole’ Mr. Rogers.


  69. Frank M Says:

    It’s not his fault you have a reading comprehension problem…..

    Ah yes. You smug progressives. “They can’t read or understand us - stupid lower class slobs - but at least we know what’s good for them”.


  70. SomeGaveAll Says:

    Those who are badmouthing the deceased Fred Rogers on this thread should read a few interviews w/someone who got his start working w/him behind the scenes on Mr. Rogers’ Neighborhood- actor Michael Keaton. Nothing but praise from Keaton, who was then an unknown production assistant/gofer for Fred & Co.


  71. Zooey Says:

    How do they even try to turn this into a social problem, let alone hint that it’s anyone’s “fault”?
    Comment by spit take

    People criticize kids for being lazy and stupid, but when they try to excel, they are still criticized.

    They cannot win!


  72. chimpeach Says:

    #37 Frank M

    If you are not against innocence why are you for stuff like sex before marriage, abortion and children without dads?

    Why are you for having sex with little kids, and beating your wives, and cheating on them? With gay hookers?!!!


  73. effrenatus Says:

    The right-wing oligarch’s objectives rely on a “gammas” in society. If every child is special and every child deserves opportunity to excel, the “alpha” class is threatened. These people truly believe they are better and more deserving than you, and that their children are better and more deserving than yours. Fox certainly has no choice except to embrace this putrid belief.


  74. leftcoast Says:

    #26 Within a year I believe Fox News will be so irrelevant and obsolete that they’ll just vanish completely from the radar. Right now, no with any sense of credibility or self-respect will appear on their programming which says a bunch.

    Comment by veritas
    They are going the way of right-wing hate radio in ratings loss, and may be further along to their demise because they no longer can fool enough listeners.


  75. dogtrottors Says:

    I’m a liberal and I watch fox news because CNN is too anti-American. I just can’t stand it.


  76. skippin Says:

    It’s fifteen minutes of Ann Coulteresque fame for a nobody finance professor langushing in a second-rate university in the heart of Bible-pounding racist xenophobic dumbass America. He’s made it to Faux.

    He and his degenerate family will be watching reruns of this video every Thanksgiving as they wipe their greasy fingers on the lining of their dinner jackets, yukking it up at how everybody’s just looking for a handout.


  77. Frank M Says:

    What are you talking about chimpeach? I do nothing of the kind!


  78. chimpeach Says:

    #64 LandSurveyor

    …is that a new handle you’re sporting?

    If I had a nickel for every time someone asked me that…


  79. Zooey Says:

    I’m conservative and I like Mr. Rogers.
    My 20 month old daughter watches his show almost everyday.
    Comment by Ringo — July 6, 2007 @ 5:14 pm

    So you’ll be sending FOX an email telling them how you feel about this story, right?


  80. Zooey Says:

    I’m a liberal and I watch fox news because CNN is too anti-American. I just can’t stand it.
    Comment by dogtrottors — July 6, 2007 @ 5:18 pm

    Bullshit.


  81. chimpeach Says:

    #76 Frank M

    What are you talking about chimpeach? I do nothing of the kind!

    Of course you do. You’re a conservative, right? All conservatives do those things, so you do to.

    I’m surprised I have to explain that to you.


  82. RUCerious Says:

    Ah yes. You dumbass retrogressives. “You can’t read or understand us - or even understand when we’re dissing you”


  83. StinkyBritches Says:

    #78: That would be a bad idea. FOX would be sending their Security Team to discuss the problem with Mr. Ringo.


  84. Mr. President Says:

    chimpeach, chimpeach, CHIMPEACH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    AAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHH HHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


  85. tarazan Says:

    Even Mr. Rogers is not safe from being attacked by these nuts & Friends at Fox.
    They,everyday, have to find someone to attack or smear…
    They think its funny.
    What evidence these hollow heads have to prove their point of view about Mr. Rogers…nothing…
    Just another day of selling Fox morning trash to the dummies .


  86. spit take Says:

    Ah yes. You smug progressives. “They can’t read or understand us - stupid lower class slobs - but at least we know what’s good for them”.

    Comment by Frank M — July 6, 2007 @ 5:16 pm

    Why is it smug to point out that you have trouble comprehending the written word?

    Why do you feel entitled to be treated like an intelligent contributor when your posts are such clear evidence of the opposite?


  87. chimpeach Says:

    Thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you.


  88. Zooey Says:

    #78: That would be a bad idea. FOX would be sending their Security Team to discuss the problem with Mr. Ringo.
    Comment by StinkyBritches

    Heh.

    If he has a spine he’ll do it anyway. :)


  89. Frank M Says:

    chimpeach: What are you talking about? You don’t know me. I am not a pedofile or a goddamned Faggot.


  90. flippin Says:

    In my experience, those who behave with the most irritating sense of entitlement are the wealthy. They expect a lot from the government, and they get what they pay for. They expect a lot from those who work for them, or they hire an illegal Mexican or offshore the job to India. They expect a lot from the right wing media to keep the masses numb with tragic plights of rich white girls writ large and nationwide while Rome burns. They hold out their hands for tax breaks, and though they’ve benefitted the most from the system they’ve set up, and though they have the most to protect, they offer nothing in return.

    And then they have the unmitigated audacity to complain about the narcissism of others. It’s stunning.


  91. Zooey Says:

    I’m surprised I have to explain that to you.
    Comment by chimpeach — July 6, 2007 @ 5:20 pm

    His dog ate his copy of The Neo-Con Agenda ™.


  92. dogpoopers Says:

    I’m a liberal and I watch fox news because CNN is too anti-American. I just can’t stand it.

    Comment by dogtrottors — July 6, 2007 @ 5:18 pm

    I’m a conservative and I listen to Randi Rhodes because Ed Schultz is just too right-wing for me.


  93. A. Cravan Says:

    I am not a pedofile or a goddamned Faggot.

    Yer just another simple-minded bedwetting bootlicker.


  94. chimpeach Says:

    #88 Frank M

    chimpeach: What are you talking about? You don’t know me. I am not a pedofile or a goddamned Faggot.

    There’s the tip-off. You went way overboard trying to convince us you’re not gay. You even capitalized “Faggot”. Yep, you’re gay alright.

    And, of course, the pedophilia goes without saying. After all, you’re a conservative.


  95. Rosencrantz Says:

    I may be wrong, but Fox isn’t too far off the mark. A study was done not too long ago that studied a generation of kids who were raised with the whole “I’m unique and special” method of parenting and learning. The kids grew into adults with an inflated sense of self-entitlement and an attitude that everything should be easy and handed to them.

    I haven’t actually read the study so I can’t comment on whether or not Mr. Roger’s was named or referenced.


  96. toasterhead Says:

    I’m a liberal and I watch fox news because CNN is too anti-American. I just can’t stand it.

    Comment by dogtrottors — July 6, 2007 @ 5:18 pm

    That’s kinda like saying “I’m not gay, but I watch gay porn because the storylines in straight porn are just too ludicrous. He doesn’t even LOOK like a cable installer.”


  97. RUCerious Says:

    Methinks Frank J/M protesteth too much.


  98. Ringo Says:

    So you’ll be sending FOX an email telling them how you feel about this story, right?

    Comment by Zooey
    ———————————————————————————–

    Perhaps….Although I rarely watch FOX News (or any other TV News).


  99. A. Cravan Says:

    #96. I haven’t actually read the study…

    Then shut up.


  100. Mr. President Says:

    Comment by Rosencrantz — July 6, 2007 @ 5:25 pm

    100% Correct.

    See, the Lefties think all kids are special REGARDLESS of merit, that is how MR can ruin America.

    Like I said, he is kind of a pussy.


  101. RUCerious Says:

    Q:
    Would a pedofile be someone who uses a rasp file on their toenails?


  102. Wayne Says:

    Ah yes. You dumbass retrogressives. “You can’t read or understand us - or even understand when we’re dissing you”
    Comment by RUCerious

    I keep warning him not to hurt himself when he thinks, but he does it anyway, lmao

    Frank is definately not the brightest bulb in the room.


  103. Frank M Says:

    chimpeach: Why don’t you just leave me alone before I sue you for internet harrassment or liabel? And I’m no stinking faggot. That “F” in my post was just a mistake.

    You have no right to say I’m homo.


  104. Arthur C. Says:

    #101.

    Show us “the study,” or STFU.


  105. Mr. President Says:

    Comment by Ringo — July 6, 2007 @ 5:27 pm

    There is no need for you to write a letter to anyone.

    FOX is right about this.

    Just make sure you teach your daughter the importance of hard work, so that she does not feel entitled to everything just because she breaths oxygen.


  106. Mr. President Says:

    Comment by RUCerious — July 6, 2007 @ 5:28 pm

    Possibly.


  107. Tom Says:

    but at least we know what’s good for them”.

    Comment by Frank M

    Its because you have hitched your wagon to Mr. Bush’s star and you have a failure complex. You thought Bush was good for you. You thought Iraq would work out well. You thought lots of things which turned out absolutely wrong. Assisting the helpless is what progressives do.


  108. RUCerious Says:

    OK, now I’m starting to think Frankie is a parody troll…
    before I sue you for internet harrassment or liabel?
    You have no right to say I’m homo.

    You can’t make shit like this up~~!!


  109. Wayne Says:

    I haven’t actually read the study
    Comment by Rosencrantz

    Yet you offer your opinion on something you are ignorant of?


  110. chimpeach Says:

    #101 Mr. President

    Like I said, he is kind of a pussy.

    Well, then you have to ask the question, “What kind of a man would beat up on a dead pussy?”

    Perhaps someone who doesn’t have the guts to beat up on a live pussy? That’s pretty sad.


  111. Arthur C. Says:

    You have no right to say I’m homo.

    Why is it that right-wingers inevitably choose as leaders “daddy types” to protect them from evil? Can’t they take care of themselves?

    Sounds kind of gay to me, Frank.


  112. chimpeach Says:

    - but at least we know what’s good for them”.

    Comment by Frank M

    Jeff Gannon knows what’s good for you, Frank.


  113. Mr. President Says:

    Comment by chimpeach — July 6, 2007 @ 5:32 pm

    You moron.

    That’s like saying “Someone who thinks that Hitler’s philosophy is dangerous, is a coward. Because Hitler is not here to defend himself!”

    Good Lord, you Lefties are dumb.


  114. Arthur C. Says:

    Mr. President’s guide to child-rearing: “Tell your children they are ordinary, every day, in every way. They are nothing special, and deserve nothing. Pound it into their little skulls.”

    It must suck to be you, Mr P.


  115. RUCerious Says:

    Mr Pee, please examine your feet.
    Your shoes are on the wrong feet and someone has tied your shoelaces together.


  116. Frank M Says:

    I’m just going to ignore following people from now on: chimpeach, Wayne and Arthur C.


  117. RUCerious Says:

    #115, even more like,
    take your kids for a ride in the car, then leave them in the parking lot while you get drunk at the bar.


  118. Frank M Says:

    Who is Jeff Gannon?


  119. chimpeach Says:

    #114 Mr. President

    That’s like saying “Someone who thinks that Hitler’s philosophy is dangerous, is a coward. Because Hitler is not here to defend himself!”

    Good Lord, you Lefties are dumb.

    Sorry. I forgot about Mr. Rogers killing six million Jews.

    Hit him again! I think he just flinched!


  120. dogtrottors Says:

    Why is it that right-wingers inevitably choose as leaders “daddy types” to protect them from evil? Can’t they take care of themselves?

    —————-

    My congressman is William Jefferson. He should throw his hat into the ring for the presidency.


  121. RUCerious Says:

    Well, now Frank j/m and Jake have ignore lists.
    Come on, how effing transparent do you have to be Jake/Frank/j/m…


  122. Wayne Says:

    You have no right to say I’m homo.—-Frank M

    Awww, ya’ll made Frank cry…..
    Poor baby.


  123. StinkyBritches Says:

    I don’t think Frank M is Jake. He’s just too stupid to be even Jake in disguise.


  124. Loonie Says:

    Perhaps they could have a go at mother Teresa next.


  125. RUCerious Says:

    Please don’t deny your Beau on the internets, Jake/Frank.
    Jeff won’t give you any more head if you’re a bad boy.


  126. -------- Says:

    Just make sure you teach your daughter the importance of hard work, so that she does not feel entitled to everything just because she breaths oxygen.

    Comment by Mr. President — July 6, 2007 @ 5:30 pm

    You sound like a trust fund baby yourself…


  127. Zooey Says:

    I haven’t actually read the study so I can’t comment on whether or not Mr. Roger’s was named or referenced.
    Comment by Rosencrantz

    Kids probably are being raised with some sense of entitlement, it’s been part of our culture for a while — I’m not saying it’s right, just saying it’s fact.

    PARENTS have the greatest effect on their children, not Mr Rogers for 1/2 hour a day.

    The War on Mr Rogers is totally bogus.


  128. RUCerious Says:

    StinkyBreeches, yer probably right, but it’s a wierd coincidence that they both now have Ignor(ant) lists.


  129. Badger Says:

    Mr. Rodgers gave his young audience Respect for themselves and their unique personal worth. You are all Loveable and Capable was his message.
    What’s the alternative.??Cartoons with Super-powered hero’s who Blast Away the Evil ones. Sounds like a recipe for willing cannon fodder to me.


  130. Arthur C. Says:

    Frank M. gets his undies in a bunch when he’s called gay, but doesn’t object to being called a bedwetting bootlicker. That speaks volumes about these rightwing nutjobs.


  131. Wayne Says:

    I’m just going to ignore following people from now on: chimpeach, Wayne and Arthur C.
    Comment by Frank M

    Well golly gee. I made it on a troll’s ignore list.
    Isn’t that special.
    whooptiedo.


  132. chimpeach Says:

    You have no right to say I’m homo.—-Frank M

    Actually, I think I do. I’ll have to check to be sure, but I think the First Amendment is still there.

    That’s why Mann Coulter gets to call everyone a “fag”. And we get to hear a transsexual skank calling everyone a “fag”.


  133. RUCerious Says:

    Badger, how bout Coyotes that chase roadrunners all over the desert and wind up with anvils falling on them?


  134. chimpeach Says:

    #132 Wayne

    Well golly gee. I made it on a troll’s ignore list.
    Isn’t that special.
    whooptiedo.

    It’s a red letter day for me.


  135. Zooey Says:

    Just make sure you teach your daughter the importance of hard work, so that she does not feel entitled to everything just because she breaths oxygen.
    Comment by Mr. President — July 6, 2007 @ 5:30 pm

    Oh my god, I can’t stop laughing!!

    That is an hysterically stunning statement coming from YOU.

    Amazing….


  136. RUCerious Says:

    Careful, Chimpeach, your liable to get sued for libel, so quick, grab your Bible.


  137. spit take Says:

    I don’t think Frank M is Jake. He’s just too stupid to be even Jake in disguise.

    Comment by StinkyBritches — July 6, 2007 @ 5:42 pm

    Don’t discount the plummeting mental capacity of all of the trolls. Something’s up — maybe they got this batch of Kool-Aid from China or something, but there’s some kind of delerium that’s infecting all of them. Maybe Frank really is Jake and he is just getting stupider by the day.


  138. Jane Imhotte Says:

    The first thing I thought of when I saw this about entitled weenies I thought of the atheist armageddon blog.

    Then I read about King Fetus and thought about how many parents break into a sirens wail when their precious dennis menace prodigies arent skritched behind the ear while having a golden star pasted to their foreheads to wear prouldly home.

    After these thoughts bounced around the cerebral cortex at light speed…the blur cleared.

    Mr Rogers didn’t teach these kids such college genius as beer bonging and taking a few wobbly laps on the peddle and puke trail before the educated spigots drained perfectly good liquid granola at their parents expense on the manicured grounds.

    They simply mimic their elders!


  139. SuburbanGirl Says:

    This is unbelievable on so many levels.

    Even my mom the Republican loved Mr. Rogers.

    And hey that sense of entitlement has nothing to do w/Mr. Rogers or regarding children as “special” in and of themselves (e.g. the inherent worth and dignity of every person, including little persons). It has to do with teaching them how to earn things, and that we are all good at different things but not so good at others. That’s life. But Mr. Rogers hardly transmitted a sense of entitlement.

    And speaking of entitlement and a group of people for whom there seem to be no consequences: look no farther than the neo-cons in the Bush Administration.

    These people are just so psychologically twisted on so many levels.


  140. Not Canadian Says:

    Picking on a dead man to justify your stupid argument is utterly tasteless.


  141. CD Says:

    ya know it’s bad enough that this crack pot from down south wrote this shit but even worse that fox is spreading his message of hate for both my entire generation and a kindly Minister who spent his life try to make the world a better place.

    It’s official, Fox hates Christians who don’t walk lockstep with Pat Robertson et al.


  142. wijg? Says:

    You would think FOX could find time for something other than hate.


  143. clb72 Says:

    Ah yes, Mr. Rogers killed our meritocracy. This from the folks who put Regent Law School graduates in the Department of Justice.


  144. chimpeach Says:

    #141 Not Canadian

    Picking on a dead man to justify your stupid argument is utterly tasteless.

    I think they’ve probably beaten the strawman so much he’s disintegrated, so they’re going after the dead now.


  145. Badger Says:

    Comment by RUCerious — July 6, 2007 @ 5:46 pm

    Ok. you got me. There ARE other alternatives. You won’t get me to criticize a genious animator like Chuck Jones.

    By the way…have you seen the ICE AGE Movies with the prehistoric raccon creature chasing the acorn??? Definitely an hommage to Mr. Jones and his Coyote.


  146. StinkyBritches Says:

    Maybe Frank really is Jake and he is just getting stupider by the day.

    That is certainly possible. I still find it strange that Jake - posting under another nickname and knowing that ignore-lists are typical of the original Jake - would bring up ignore lists in such a blatantly obvious way.


  147. missmolly Says:

    Telling a child he/she is special and worth something is not the same as telling a child he/she is entitled to everything he/she wants. Mr. Rogers didn’t spoil children, he validated them. There’s a big difference. I never once saw Mr. Rogers tell children that they need to beg for what they didn’t earn.

    Children get far more of their sense of entitlement from another part of television — advertising. Further enhanced by parents who can’t say no to anything.

    Fox never really had much of a grip, but they are losing what tenuous hold on reality they ever had by broadcasting stuff like this and the claim that universal health care breeds terrorism. What’s next — recycling newspapers leads to atheism?


  148. sarah Says:

    We should not have grades because that will make the children that are not as bright feel bad, and every child is special and important in their own way. We cannot hurt their fragile egos with trivial things such as grades and rewarding achievement. School is to learn about your fellow man, not find out who is best or smartest.


  149. enaud Says:

    This is beyond belief. This shows their craveness clearly, and it doesn’t speak well of the trolls here either. If they are so desperate that they have to attack Mr Rogers, then there is nothing anyone can say to them that will make any difference. They are lower than whale shit in the Mariannas trench, and that is low.


  150. Wayne Says:

    Oh my god, I can’t stop laughing!!
    Comment by Zooey

    Yeah, PiPpy’s drivel was hilarious
    Funniest thing is I think he was trying to be serious. =D


  151. Zooey Says:

    Comment by missmolly — July 6, 2007 @ 5:57 pm

    You’ve said it best.


  152. RUCerious Says:

    Badger, indeed, and it’s one of my faves.


  153. Jane Imhotte Says:

    Definitely an hommage to Mr. Jones and his Coyote.

    Comment by Badger

    I likened the movie to biblical texts. Fear, Floods, False Prophets, Materialism, The Tree of life (the nut) And the ever receding goal to find out what God [sometimes called Nut] and life is all about.

    In the end the prehistoric Squirrel/Raccoon almost grasp what he so desired, only to be brought back to life and to begin all over again.


  154. Wayne Says:

    well it’s been a fun troll bashing, but I have a gig to play tonight, Later all


  155. timmy Says:

    It actually wasn’t Fox News that did this study it was done by the professor at LSU, and they are just reprorting on it.


  156. dogtrottors Says:

    I wonder if Mr. Rogers has ever had sex.


  157. ForTruth Says:

    This is too much.


  158. timmy Says:

    It isn’t like school should be about the learning, now is it?
    What’s wrong with allowing a student to work a little harder at something they need practice with to cement some learning in place.
    It’s not like they’re not ‘earning’ the extra credit.

    No, it’s about you, the almighty instructor, with the godlike power of issuing grades.

    Comment by RUCerious

    Why should some student get an extra opportunity to raise their grade. What about the students that earned the higher grade based on the work assigned? Doesn’t that do them a dis-severice and watering down their achievement? What about the students that don’t complain and whine to get their grade raised? Why should only the complainers get another chance?


  159. spit take Says:

    It actually wasn’t Fox News that did this study it was done by the professor at LSU, and they are just reprorting on it.

    Comment by timmy — July 6, 2007 @ 6:08 pm

    Actually, Timmeh, Fox’s Brian Kilmeade said “that man unintentionally did a whole generation or two a disservice.”

    So they commented on it as well as reporting it.

    Not a good start, Timmeh. Why don’t you just go back to whatever troll ID you were getting beaten under before, and save “Timmeh” until he can start fresh, huh?


  160. ForTruth Says:

    Yeah Molly called it.

    Next thread.


  161. Arthur C. Says:

    #156: It actually wasn’t Fox News that did this study

    I’m clear on that, junior. I’m talking about what a stupid editorial decison it was on the part of those soulless blowhards at Fox to feature it as if it is legitimate scholarly research. It isn’t.


  162. Zooey Says:

    I wonder if Mr. Rogers has ever had sex.
    Comment by dogtrottors

    Since there is a Mrs Rogers and their two children, I think it’s say to say YES.


  163. timmy Says:

    I’m clear on that, junior. I’m talking about what a stupid editorial decison it was on the part of those soulless blowhards at Fox to feature it as if it is legitimate scholarly research. It isn’t.

    Comment by Arthur C

    The Wall Street Journal reported on it to, are you upset with them to?


  164. gummitch Says:

    This is what I’ve got say to that, care of Richard Thompson (c) 1988

    Richard Thompson
    ° Can’t Win °

    I started to cry, they put gin in my cup
    I started to crawl, and they swaddled me up
    I got up and run, they said “Easy, son,
    Play up, play the game”

    They told me to think and forget what I’d heard
    They told me to lie and they questioned my word
    They told me to fail, better sink than sail,
    Just play the game

    Oh, towers will tumble and locusts will visit the land
    Oh, a curse on your house and your children and the fruit of your hand

    They said “You can’t win. You can’t win.
    You sweat blood. You give in.
    You can’t win. You can’t win.
    Turn the cheek. Take it on the chin.
    Don’t you dare do this. Don’t you dare do that”
    We shoot down dreams, we stiletto in the back
    Oh the nerve of some people, the nerve of some people,
    The nerve of some
    I don’t know who you think you are, who you think you are

    Oh what kind of mother would hamstring her sons?
    Throw sand in their eyes and put ice on their tongues
    Ah better to leave than stay here and grieve
    And play the game

    Don’t waken the dead as you sleepwalk around
    If you have a dream, brother, hush, not a sound
    Just stand there and rust, die if you must
    But play the game

    Oh, if we can’t have it, why should a wretch like you?
    Oh, it was drilled in our heads, now we drill it into your head too.

    They said “You can’t win. You can’t win.
    You sweat blood. You give in.
    You can’t win. You can’t win.
    Turn the cheek. Take it on the chin.
    Don’t you dare do this. Don’t you dare do that”
    We shoot down dreams, we stiletto in the back
    Oh, the nerve of some people, the nerve of some people,
    The nerve of some people
    I don’t know who you think you are
    The nerve of some people, the nerve of some people
    The nerve of some people, the nerve of some people
    The nerve of some people, the nerve of some people
    The nerve of some people, the nerve of some people


  165. Arthur C. Says:

    The Wall Street Journal reported on it to, are you upset with them to?

    Of course I am, dumbass. Do you believe everything you read in WSJ?


  166. Badger Says:

    I likened the movie to biblical texts

    Comment by Jane Imhotte — July 6, 2007 @ 6:04 pm

    I definitely picked up on that too, particularly in the Second Movie.
    Maybe they realized that the characters were from over 6000 years ago….a touchy subject for SOME movie goers…and were striving for Balance.
    I was more delighted by their animation skills than their story line, but that raccoon in acorn heaven was priceless.
    Sorry to all for going off topic.


  167. timmy Says:

    Of course I am, dumbass. Do you believe everything you read in WSJ?

    Comment by Arthur C

    Then why only bring up Fox News?


  168. Cpt. Crepitus Says:

    dear timmy —
    the extra credit is available for all students who want to take advantage of doing some extra work.


  169. popothebright Says:

    Well.. they have a point about expectation.

    The grade inflation at Harvard is just hilarious. I had harder classes in high school.


  170. Matthew Says:

    Using Mr. Rogers as the reason of spoiled ungrateful children with feelings of entitlement such as myself is quite an oversimplification of the issue, but I’m glad that it isn’t only me who feels so special without any justification to feel that way.

    I hated that show as a child, such a bore, and it was rather creepy to me as well.


  171. timmy Says:

    dear timmy —
    the extra credit is available for all students who want to take advantage of doing some extra work.

    Comment by Cpt. Crepitus

    In what case? The professor here is talking about students that are not happy with their grades so they beg for some extra credit? He is not referring to extra credit available and outlined in the syllabus. Read the article, the study was because students thought they deserved more than their grade said, so they petitioned for a higher grade via extra credit.


  172. Null Says:

    Dear CNN,

    Are you sure this is the “news” network that you want to emulate? I mean, seriously.

    It’s Mr. Roger’s fault now? What a bunch of temper tantrum, whiny little brats these NeoCons are.


  173. James M. Jensen II Says:

    Yes, because kids used to accept bad grades with stiff upper lip and renewed sense of determination.

    This is a new low.

    These people are sick.


  174. OxyCon Says:

    Take a look at the great man that Fox “News” is smearing:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Rogers


  175. timmy Says:

    Are you sure this is the “news” network that you want to emulate? I mean, seriously.

    It’s Mr. Roger’s fault now? What a bunch of temper tantrum, whiny little brats these NeoCons are.

    Comment by Null

    Fox News was only reporting on the study that first appeared in the Wall Street Journal by a professor at LSU.


  176. Null Says:

    Oh and comment #148 - Whoa, missmolly, could you kindly stop making sense? As per the recent BushCo memo, that’s a sign of being unAmerican.


  177. Zooey Says:

    ….students thought they deserved more than their grade said, so they petitioned for a higher grade via extra credit.
    Comment by timmy

    Please stop whining timmy, it’s very unattractive.

    BTW, last I looked petitioning for extra credit requires a yes or no answer. They could have been turned down.


  178. Arthur C. Says:

    Then why only bring up Fox News?

    Fox News happens to be the subject of this thread, kid.

    The Wall Street Journal reported on it to…

    No, it was the subject of an Op-Ed piece in WSJ. Until you learn to distinguish the difference between reporting and op-ed, maybe you should keep yer juvenile maw shut.


  179. Null Says:

    And what a NEWSWORTHY piece that was!! My God, how did we ever live without it. So Timmy, did you learn to consistently make excuses for other people’s bad/crappy/inconsiderate behavior from watching too much Fox News?


  180. timmy Says:

    Actually, Timmeh, Fox’s Brian Kilmeade said “that man unintentionally did a whole generation or two a disservice.”

    So they commented on it as well as reporting it.

    Not a good start, Timmeh. Why don’t you just go back to whatever troll ID you were getting beaten under before, and save “Timmeh” until he can start fresh, huh?

    Comment by spit take

    Yes, Brian Kilmeade gave his opinion on the study done by a professor. I don’t see your point.


  181. criticalthinker Says:

    Wanting American oil companies to have access to oil under the Iraqi sands, is not believing in a sense of entitlement?

    If there were more Mr Rogers on television, many more people would understand that!


  182. timmy Says:

    Please stop whining timmy, it’s very unattractive.

    BTW, last I looked petitioning for extra credit requires a yes or no answer. They could have been turned down.

    Comment by Zooey

    Why should the professor or teacher have to hear all the extra whining? Don’t they have enough to do?


  183. spit take Says:

    Fox News was only reporting on the study that first appeared in the Wall Street Journal by a professor at LSU.

    Comment by timmy — July 6, 2007 @ 6:31 pm

    Timmeh, you obviously skipped over the post where I pointed out that Faux news didn’t “just report” on the study — Faux host Brian Kilmeade claimed that Mr. Rogers “did generations of kids a disservice”. That’s more than “just reporting” — that’s commentary.

    If you insist on trying to argue, at least try to do it like a grownup — don’t distort, especially after your distortions have been exposed already. It makes you look stupid.


  184. Arthur C. Says:

    At the risk of repeating myself, timmy: it was a stupid editorial decison at Fox to feature it as if it is legitimate scholarly research. It isn’t. Don Chance is a finance professor at LSU, not a childhood development expert.


  185. spit take Says:

    Timmeh, do you understand the distinction between reporting and opinion?

    I didn’t think so.


  186. timmy Says:

    Fox News happens to be the subject of this thread, kid.

    The Wall Street Journal reported on it to…

    No, it was the subject of an Op-Ed piece in WSJ. Until you learn to distinguish the difference between reporting and op-ed, maybe you should keep yer juvenile maw shut.

    Comment by Arthur C.

    There is no difference in this case, it was a short little story on Fox News where the newscasters gave their opinions. What is the op part mean in op-ed (oh ya opinion!).


  187. Buck Fush Says:

    Wow, you repukians are sure showing what kind of scum you are….just look at their posts.

    YOU REPUKES ARE SICK, SICK NEANDERTHALS.


  188. spit take Says:

    There is no difference in this case, it was a short little story on Fox News where the newscasters gave their opinions. What is the op part mean in op-ed (oh ya opinion!).

    Comment by timmy — July 6, 2007 @ 6:42 pm

    I don’t understand your point.

    Do you recognize a distinction between reporting and opinion?

    Of course not, you’re a Faux News defender.


  189. timmy Says:

    Timmeh, you obviously skipped over the post where I pointed out that Faux news didn’t “just report” on the study — Faux host Brian Kilmeade claimed that Mr. Rogers “did generations of kids a disservice”. That’s more than “just reporting” — that’s commentary.

    If you insist on trying to argue, at least try to do it like a grownup — don’t distort, especially after your distortions have been exposed already. It makes you look stupid.

    Comment by spit take

    So newscasters can not give their opinion? There was also an opinion on the newscast that did not agree with the study, did you miss that part?


  190. timmy Says:

    I don’t understand your point.

    Do you recognize a distinction between reporting and opinion?

    Of course not, you’re a Faux News defender.

    Comment by spit take

    Yes they reported the findings of the study and then gave their opinions, nothing wrong with that.


  191. leporello Says:

    Will somebody please report this as obscene to the FCC? That way they’ll have to investigate Faux News. How insane are they? I never cared for the show, but it was obvious that Mr. Rodgers truly cared for children. Why not blame the Three Stooges for violence in society? How can anybody at Faux even participate in this charade? What ‘Professor’ came up with this report? Did the Skipper and Gilligan provide extra input?


  192. Arthur C. Says:

    There is no difference in this case

    You’re trying to avoid my point: you said WSJ “reported on it.” They didn’t. You lied, or you are ignorant of the distinction between reportage and op-ed. That’s very lazy thinking, kid.

    If this was debate class, I would definitely flunk you.


  193. timmy Says:

    You’re trying to avoid my point: you said WSJ “reported on it.” They didn’t. You lied, or you are ignorant of the distinction between reportage and op-ed. That’s very lazy thinking, kid.

    If this was debate class, I would definitely flunk you.

    Comment by Arthur C

    I would just whine and complain for a higher grade. OPed pieces accomplish the same thing as reporting something. The public is aware of this study because of the Wall Street Journal.


  194. shane Says:

    Just make sure you teach your daughter the importance of hard work, so that she does not feel entitled to everything just because she breaths oxygen.

    Comment by Mr. President

    Hard work like sitting at your keyboard copying reich wing talking points. And if their’s a poster who has delusions about his own self worth and importance it’s you buddy boy and your little friend CT too.

    In fact, it’s parents of children like you who don’t teach their children that they’re not better than everybody else that are the problem. Mabe you should talk to your mother and ask her why she let you believe that you are MORE SPECIAL than everybody else.


  195. devin Says:

    UTTTERLY PATHETIC TO BEAT UP ON MISTER ROGERS!! Yet, cheney’s White House Scooter-pie walks after being convicted??!!! Who are the real coddlers with golden parachutes?!