Vitter Flashback: Clinton should resign.
Sen. David Vitter (R-LA) first got his start in Congress after replacing former Rep. Bob Livingston (R-LA), who “abruptly resigned after disclosures of numerous affairs” in 1998. At the time, Vitter argued that an extramarital affair was grounds for resignation:
“I think Livingston’s stepping down makes a very powerful argument that Clinton should resign as well and move beyond this mess,” he said. [Atlanta Journal and Constitution, 12/20/98]
Sort Comments By: Top Rated | Date
Those who live by the whore, shall perish by the whore.
July 10th, 2007 at 10:25 amPayback’s a what?
July 10th, 2007 at 10:26 amAll interested media right down to bloggers have received the complete phone logs as of yesterday.
Scripted reverse phone lookups of 10 thousand shouldn’t take more than a day. Crossref with Nexus and confirming with sources shouldn’t take more than another day.
The madam has said that senior politicians from both parties are able to be confirmed via these logs.
July 10th, 2007 at 10:28 amWonder who the others are.
Typical’ Family Values’ B.S. sell….
July 10th, 2007 at 10:30 amAnd there is no shortage of fools..
Did Vitter lie under oath and obstruct justice like Clinton?
July 10th, 2007 at 10:31 amokay, let the countdown begin for Vitter’s resignation.
July 10th, 2007 at 10:31 amHey, what’s good for the goose…
Did Vitter suborn perjury? Like Clinton did.
July 10th, 2007 at 10:31 amHmm, doesn’t the Bible have a quote that says something about criticizing the mote in your brother’s eye when there’s a log in your own?
July 10th, 2007 at 10:33 amDid Vitter lie under oath and obstruct justice like Clinton?
July 10th, 2007 at 10:34 amComment by varnished NonTruth — July 10, 2007 @ 10:31 am
ummm, actually, Clinton did not lie under oath, as per definition of “sex” under the Paula Jones lawsuit.
But hey, nice try to derail from the actually content of this particular thread!
This clown’s Senate website brags about his receiving numerous awards fromt he Family Research Council.
Good ‘ol Southern values……
July 10th, 2007 at 10:34 amI just LOVE the self-righteous, church-going, Bible-thumpers who talk the talk of “the Light” but walk in the shadows.
July 10th, 2007 at 10:34 amWhat for the next Vitter talking point:
July 10th, 2007 at 10:35 am“Bill Clinton’s poor example told Americans that it’s OK to cheat on their spouses.”
Did Vitter lie under oath and obstruct justice like Clinton?
Comment by Unvarnished Truth
Now it’s the degree of the offense? I see….
How about this? Hillary knew what her husband was about, Bill never got on his high horse about other people resigning because of their sexual deviancies.
Vitter is quite literally a f*cking hypocrite who held himself above others while he was f*cking whores, who lied to his wife, his constituents, and his God.
“Unvarnished Truth,” indeed…..
July 10th, 2007 at 10:36 amUnvarnished Truth-
July 10th, 2007 at 10:36 amLibby did it too!
Lie under oath and obstruct justice that is. But Clinton was aquitted. Your boy wasn’t.
Did Vitter suborn perjury? Like Clinton did.
Comment by Unvarnished Truth
No, he didn’t. You better look that up before you trot it out again, Unpolished Knob.
July 10th, 2007 at 10:38 amDid Vitter lie under oath and obstruct justice like Clinton?
Comment by Unvarnished Truth — July 10, 2007 @ 10:31 am
Yeah, Republicans spent $100MM of taxpayer money getting Clinton to lie about a non-crime. Amazing, isn’t it?
July 10th, 2007 at 10:39 amjust LOVE the self-righteous, church-going, Bible-thumpers who talk the talk of “the Light†but walk in the shadows.
Comment by Marie
Hell, Marie, they ARE the shadows.
July 10th, 2007 at 10:41 amWhere is St. Daryll? He can surely give us a wise and thoughtful explaination as to why it was ok to bash Clinton for the same sin he has admitted.
July 10th, 2007 at 10:41 amHoly cow, at least he manned up to it decently enough
“This was a very serious sin in my past for which I am, of course, completely responsible,” Vitter said in a statement.
“Several years ago, I asked for and received forgiveness from God and my wife in confession and marriage counseling. Out of respect for my family, I will keep my discussion of the matter there –with God and them. But I certainly offer my deep and sincere apologies to all I have disappointed and let down in any way,” he wrote.
July 10th, 2007 at 10:42 amThe difference is clear between people who use’Family Values’ as a political tool ,and others who simply have sex and didn’t want to preach people values.
The burden is on those people who preach ‘values’ and later get caught breaking their own worshiped laws.
July 10th, 2007 at 10:42 amI want to know if certain defense contractors and former FBI and CIA officials are also on the Madam’s list.
July 10th, 2007 at 10:42 amAnybody got a copy?
The good Rev. James Dobson will soon be laying hands upon Sen. Vitter. I predict a happy ending.
July 10th, 2007 at 10:43 amI believe the Rightard philosophy goes something like this…
Do as I say, not as I do.
July 10th, 2007 at 10:43 amYes, but the difference is that Vitter doesn’t need to step down, as he has (allegedly) asked for and received absolution from his god.
Yes, that is the only difference.
July 10th, 2007 at 10:43 amhellina ~
July 10th, 2007 at 10:43 amSince this doesn’t involve same gender sex, Daryll has nothing to add.
#9 Hey DRxJ,
Actually, you are not correct there. Clinton was found in contempt of court in 1999 by U.S. District Judge Susan Webber Wright for giving intentionally false testimony in the Paula Jones civil suit over which she was presiding.
“Simply put, the president’s deposition testimony regarding whether he had ever been alone with Ms. (Monica) Lewinsky was intentionally false and his statements regarding whether he had ever engaged in sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky likewise were intentionally false,” the judge wrote of Clinton’s January 17, 1998 deposition.
Moreover, on Jan. 20, 2001 Clinton copped to a plea by which he that he knowingly gave misleading testimony about his affair with Monica Lewinsky in a 1998 lawsuit. Under an agreement with Independent Counsel Robert Ray, Clinton’s law license was suspended for five years and he paid a $25,000 fine to Arkansas bar officials. He also gave up any claim to repayment of his legal fees in the matter.
Moreover, in September 2001, the U.S. Supreme Court suspended Clinton from the Supreme Court bar in connection with his plea with the independent counsel.
July 10th, 2007 at 10:43 amthe hypocrisy stinks to high heaven.
July 10th, 2007 at 10:43 am“Vitter is quite literally a f*cking hypocrite who held himself above others while he was f*cking whores…”
Amen! But I’d like to point out that Vitter (and all the other men) are big fat whores, too.
July 10th, 2007 at 10:44 amGod does not accept your apology, nor do I pay your wages. So I suggest you resign.
July 10th, 2007 at 10:45 amUnpolished Knob.
Comment by Zooey — July 10, 2007 @ 10:38 am
this may be the funniest, most truthful, comeback EVER!
July 10th, 2007 at 10:46 am(may I use that when I cut and paste his idiocy, or do you have patent on it?)
Republicans’ Tagline: Responsibility means ONLY having to say you’re sorry.
July 10th, 2007 at 10:46 amComment by Exley — July 10, 2007 @ 10:43 am
Hey Exley, give us four paragraphs on VITTER. You know, the topic of THIS THREAD.
July 10th, 2007 at 10:47 amAND, Vitter’s wife is gonna cut of his Johnson Rod:
Vitter’s wife, Wendy, was asked in 1998 what she would do if her husband strayed. “I’m a lot more like Lorena Bobbitt than Hillary,†she said. “If he does something like that, I’m walking away with one thing, and it’s not alimony, trust me. I think fear is a very good motivating factor in a marriage.â€
July 10th, 2007 at 10:47 amthis may be the funniest, most truthful, comeback EVER!
(may I use that when I cut and paste his idiocy, or do you have patent on it?)
Comment by DRxJ
Feel free, my dear. :)
July 10th, 2007 at 10:48 amHey Exley, give us four paragraphs on VITTER. You know, the topic of THIS THREAD.
Comment by Zooey — July 10, 2007 @ 10:47 am
Exley likes living in the past. He likes it so much he still has his mom change his diapers, and he’s 28.
July 10th, 2007 at 10:49 am#33 ~ She sounds like a real southern Belle, Belle Starr that is.
July 10th, 2007 at 10:51 amHey Zooey,
Had to correct the misstatement of law, fact and history uttered earlier in the thread. I have done so. Carry on.
July 10th, 2007 at 10:51 am#26: I think everyone can agree that Clinton is a liar. So, do you think this somehow excuses the dishonest behavior of Republicans? Does this mean that Republicans should not be held accountable for their actions because, well, “Clinton did it”?
July 10th, 2007 at 10:51 amand liberals have always said, “But, But, But….Clinton’s sexual life is private, a politicians sexual life is private. No one should use Clinton’s private life to attack him.”
hypocrites, Libtards.
Libtards should be screaming at left wing pundits like TP for using Vitter’s private life to destroy him.
I on the other hand am consistant and he should do what Clinton didn’t do and resign, but Libtards are a bunch of hypocrites.
July 10th, 2007 at 10:52 amExley, I will now disagree with you. I will try to paste this and hope the TP filter let’s it thru:
(Bold type is mine)
Clinton also said, “there is not a sexual relationship, an improper sexual relationship or any other kind of improper relationship”[6] which he defended as truthful on 17 August 1998 hearing, famously arguing “it depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is”[7] (i.e., he was not, at the time he made that statement, still having a sexual relationship with Lewinsky). Under pressure from Starr, who as Clinton learned had obtained from Lewinsky a blue dress with Clinton’s semen stain, as well as testimony from Lewinsky that the president had inserted a cigar-tube into her vagina, Clinton admitted that he misled the American people and that he had had an “inappropriate intimate contact” with Lewinsky. Clinton denied having committed perjury because, in the court’s definition , oral sex was not “sex” per se.
Please also follow this link
http://www.huppi.com/ kangaroo/ L-clintonjonesperjury.html
oh, you’re so welcome
July 10th, 2007 at 10:53 amI think both sides can come up with reasons why what the other guy did was worse than what their guy did. There seems to be plenty of sexual misconduct and plenty of hypocrisy everywhere we look.
Sexual misconduct, while sordid and vulgar, should not be grounds for resignation or forced removal from office. Let’s allow the voters to make those decisions at the ballot box, and reserve forced removal for graver sins — such as lying to get us into unnecessary wars, violating the civil rights of Americans, and election fraud.
July 10th, 2007 at 10:53 amAt least he’snot a homo like that other Republican they caught having sex with a Senate page. What was that uy’S name?
July 10th, 2007 at 10:54 amWhat webs we weave, those who would make whores of their souls! Vitter needs to resign immediately lest he be called a liar, hypocrite, and a whoremaster.
July 10th, 2007 at 10:55 amAt the time, Vitter argued that an extramarital affair was grounds for resignation:
He’s absolutely right on this one. Bye Vitter!
July 10th, 2007 at 10:55 amGet some marriage counseling and be a decent human being for a change.
Vitter down/Cheney next??
July 10th, 2007 at 10:55 amSgt. Higgins: You know these hypocrites only need alcohol rehab, don’t you?? ROTFL
July 10th, 2007 at 10:56 amDid Vitter lie under oath and obstruct justice like Clinton?
Comment by Unvarnished Truth
Now it’s the degree of the offense? I see….
How about this? Hillary knew what her husband was about, Bill never got on his high horse about other people resigning because of their sexual deviancies.
Vitter is quite literally a f*cking hypocrite who held himself above others while he was f*cking whores, who lied to his wife, his constituents, and his God.
“Unvarnished Truth,†indeed…..
Comment by Zooey — July 10, 2007 @ 10:36 am
are you fcking stupid Zooey? oh wait, you are!!
Libtards are the biggest hypocrites on planet Earth. Here is a quick example. While libtards like Al gore and others tell you and I how to live in order to supposedly safe the planet from the fake Global Warming crap, they live like kings and queens being the biggest consumers on planet Earth.
and this story is also a glaring example of Liberal hypocrisy. Whores like you have always said when anyone has brought Clinton’s infidelities that it was and is his private life and that no politician’s private life should be used against him. So why are you condoning TPs use of Vitter’s private life to go after him? care to explain stupid Libtard? hypocrite!
July 10th, 2007 at 10:56 amYou know, there was a time when there was bipartisan agreement on hanky-panky and personal indiscretions. Both parties agreed: Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil.
Then the Christian Right came rolling into town and decided to clear out those Godless liberals. Only they had a tough time avoiding temptation themselves and had to coverup all their pecadilloes.
This turned them into to lying, cheating, conniving hypocrites. And Christian Republicans believe, once they have been damned, they might as well go the whole hog. So they stole, killed, bore false witness, and coveted everything that wasn’t nailed down.
And that’s why this is a juicy scandal. Liberals would have said “Live and let live”, but the Christian Right has been so bloodthirsty and screaming “Die, Liberal, die!” that they won’t let them get off this easy. Either the Republicans judge themselves as they have judged or they should pack up their sex toys and go home.
July 10th, 2007 at 10:56 amI have a very sneaking suspicion that there will be more numbers attached to some very significant names higher up on the food chain.
July 10th, 2007 at 10:56 amSo Vitter “manned” up to it–after he was caught! In the meantime he sanctimoniously condemned Clinton when Clinton was caught lying under oath when answering a very personal question that should never have been asked!
We’ll soon know who else is on the madam’s list, won’t we?
July 10th, 2007 at 10:57 amWhy else would The Shrub put a “gag order” on Palfrey?? Couldn’t that also be considered a flagrant attempt by Bush to obstruct justice?
July 10th, 2007 at 10:57 amtruly, the most depraved and craven are the ones who wrap themselves in piety and religious ferver.
July 10th, 2007 at 10:57 am#47: More excuses for CRIMINAL REPUBLICANS. Hahahahaha! I guess if you didn’t support the CRIMINALS in your party, there wouldn’t be anyone left to support.
July 10th, 2007 at 10:57 amAs Washington is abuzz with the news that GOP Sen. David Vitter once used the “DC Madam’s†escort service, the ears of his wife, Wendy Vitter, must be ringing. In 2000, you see, Ms. Wendy was quoted in a news article focused on Bill Clinton’s marital infidelities.
“I’m a lot more like Lorena Bobbitt than Hillary,†she told a reporter regarding whether she could forgive her husband if she learned he’d cheated as Hillary Clinton had done after Monica Lewinsky became a household name. “I’m walking away with one thing, and it’s not alimony, trust me.â€
http://bigheaddc.com/ 2007/ 07/ 10/ sen-vitters-wife-said-shed-cut-off-his-penis-if-he-were-caught-cheating/
July 10th, 2007 at 10:58 amDavid: Absolutely! It’s a case of “he that doth protest too much”, is’t it? This makes it especially heinous and demented - to claim to be “walking their own talk” and then we discover that they’re just using “the talk” to hide behind. Amazing how doubly devious that is and how it becomes exponentially greater an offense.
July 10th, 2007 at 10:59 amRepublicans’ Tagline: Responsibility means ONLY having to say you’re sorry.
Comment by Republicans Can’t Govern — July 10, 2007 @ 10:46 am
Democratic Party’s tagline: Responsibility means never saying I am sorry, and never admitting to our corruption, but always blaming Republicans of what we do.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:00 am#53 I saw a new bumper sticker for recruitment to the GOP. It read:
GOP - Sycophants, Liars, and Charlatans need only apply.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:00 am#55 Don’t you have that a bit backwards, dude?
July 10th, 2007 at 11:00 amHad to correct the misstatement of law, fact and history uttered earlier in the thread. I have done so. Carry on.
Comment by Exley
**eyes rolling**
July 10th, 2007 at 11:01 amtruly, the most depraved and craven are the ones who wrap themselves in piety and religious ferver.
Comment by me — July 10, 2007 @ 10:57 am
You are right, look how Billy Boy Clinton was always shown as going to Sunday Baptist Church during his 8 years of his Presidency.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:01 am#53 I saw a new bumper sticker for recruitment to the GOP. It read:
GOP - Sycophants, Liars, and Charlatans need only apply.
Comment by veritas — July 10, 2007 @ 11:00 am
I saw a similar, but it read…
Democratic Party-Sycophants, Liars and Charlatans need only apply.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:02 amSexual misconduct, should not be grounds for resignation or forced removal from office. Let’s allow the voters to make those decisions at the ballot box
Comment by missmolly
I agree, sort of. I also don’t think it should be grouns for forced removal, but it should be grounds or resignation. I think it’s a matter of deceiving the voters who previously showed up at the ballot box.
I have to believe that he ran ads when he was running (I could be wrong) that likely showed him with his wife (and kids), you know, a strong family man. There probably weren’t any ads showing him in the arms of a hooker (again, I could be wrong).
This guy Vitter let down the coonstituents who put him in office in the first place. He ran on a ‘traditional’ ticket and argued for the sanctity of marriage. He had a serious lack of judgment. How can the people of La. depend on him not to make other poor decisions with something that might not be so ‘personal’ next time?
July 10th, 2007 at 11:02 amHow many lies has Bush committed and has never taken one iota of responsibility for?? Of course, admission is part/parcel of the “saying sorry” process. Of course, we all know that “saying sorry” doesn’t cut the mustard after the fact. The amoral/criminal behavior exits and will be prosecuted in a court of law….with Vitter becoming state’s witness against Palfrey now since he’s clearly admitted that it was a wee bit more than a therapeutic massage. In his book, I can only imagine what a “sin” would mean??
July 10th, 2007 at 11:02 am#40,
DRxJ,
With all due respect, the court, to whom Clinton referred in trying to claim that he did not give false testimony, disagreed with Clinton and held him in contempt of court for intentionally giving misleading testimony. The “court” was Judge Susan Webber Wright…She was the one presiding over the Paula Jones cases. She was the one who defined “sexual relations,” as that term was to be used in the case. And she was the one who determined that Clinton misled the court by denying he had sexual relations, as that term was defined by the court, with Lewinsky.
In short, DRxJ, you are accurately recounting Clinton’s claimed defense to the charge that he lied to the court. But, what you are leaving out is that the court categorically rejected Clinton’s defense and found him in contempt of court.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:03 amWhores like you have always said when anyone has brought Clinton’s infidelities that it was and is his private life and that no politician’s private life should be used against him. So why are you condoning TPs use of Vitter’s private life to go after him? care to explain stupid Libtard? hypocrite!
Comment by Conservatron — July 10, 2007 @ 10:56 am
Zooey isn’t making that argument - Senator David Vitter (R-LA) is. Or at least, he did in 1998, when he made a public statement in his official capacity as a U.S. Senator telling Bill Clinton to resign over something he did in his private life. It’s not hypocritical to say that he should hold himself to the same standard.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:03 amare you fcking stupid Zooey? oh wait, you are!!
Libtards are the biggest hypocrites on planet Earth. Here is a quick example. While libtards like Al gore and others tell you and I how to live in order to supposedly safe the planet from the fake Global Warming crap, they live like kings and queens being the biggest consumers on planet Earth.
and this story is also a glaring example of Liberal hypocrisy. Whores like you have always said when anyone has brought Clinton’s infidelities that it was and is his private life and that no politician’s private life should be used against him. So why are you condoning TPs use of Vitter’s private life to go after him? care to explain stupid Libtard? hypocrite!
Comment by Conservatron
When you’ve got nothing you bring up global warming and Clinton.
Hypocrisy brought down Vitter, and it will bring you down as well.
Dismissed.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:03 amWhat I find fascinating is how Bush professes to be such a religious man yet he hasn’t a clue about the doctrine involved in his own religion. Hapless fool.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:03 amHey Zooey,
Had to correct the misstatement of law, fact and history uttered earlier in the thread. I have done so. Carry on.
Comment by Exley(WTF is wrong with dem Mets?) — July 10, 2007 @ 10:51 am
Hey Zooey,
July 10th, 2007 at 11:03 amHad to correct the correction that was misstated regarding law, fact and history as it pertains to the court’s definition of “sexual relations” uttered earlier in the thread. I have done so. Carry on!
Vitter, you must resign.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:04 am#55. Wrong, again, misinformed one. We’re the party that stripped William Jefferson of his committee membership. And he hasn’t yet been found guilty of anything.
Republican tagline: We claim we’re the party of strong moral values. But don’t take away our prostitutes, straight or gay.
Hahahahaha!
July 10th, 2007 at 11:04 amWhen you’ve got nothing you bring up global warming and Clinton.
Hypocrisy brought down Vitter, and it will bring you down as well.
Dismissed.
Comment by Zooey — July 10, 2007 @ 11:03 am
That’s right, Zooey! Children like conservatron, Mr. P. and Darryl should be seen and not heard. In my book, they’re dismissed and irrelevant.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:05 amto guns’n'bibles —
You raise a good point. In my post, I was only talking about sexual misconduct among consenting adults being sordid and vulgar but not grounds for removal. Hitting up the pages is still beyond the pale.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:06 amAnd that’s why this is a juicy scandal. Liberals would have said “Live and let liveâ€, but the Christian Right has been so bloodthirsty and screaming “Die, Liberal, die!†that they won’t let them get off this easy. Either the Republicans judge themselves as they have judged or they should pack up their sex toys and go home.
Comment by david — July 10, 2007 @ 10:56 am
1) This story just broke, who the fck said Vitter is being let off easy?
2) I can guarantee you that when a Democratic politician is name in this whole scandal you Libtards will run to his aid while still attacking any Republican that is also involved, like Vitter.
3) I already wrote an e-mail to Vitter’s office demanding his resignation as much as he demanded President Clinton’s.
4) The only hypocrite here are the Libtards who have for over a decade claimed that Clinton’s extra marital affairs are private and should have never been used against him. yet look at how Libtards are drooling over this story. When is one of your own, you will defend their immorality, but when it is a Republican you will attack them for the same thing.
man you Libtards are too predictable, a bunch of whiny hypocrites.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:06 am#69Yes, and let’s get those white house visitor logs and check into those 200+ “known” visits by Jeffie Lube before Bush shut down the public’s right to know who is coming and going at wee hours of the night there. Let’s get those visitor logs subpoenaed so we can see who’s lying.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:07 amHey Zooey,
Had to correct the correction that was misstated regarding law, fact and history as it pertains to the court’s definition of “sexual relations†uttered earlier in the thread. I have done so. Carry on!
Comment by DRxJ
Heh. You know Exley will tear the world apart so he can be right, don’t you? :)
July 10th, 2007 at 11:08 amlike Al gore and others tell you and I how to live in order to supposedly safe the planet from the fake Global Warming crap, they live like kings and queens being the biggest consumers on planet Earth.
Comment by Conservatron
With me, it’s less about hypocrisy and MUCH MORE about poor judgment. Your references to Gore don’t apply here.
Vitter can say one thing and do another, that’s hypocrisy.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:08 amBut showing such a distinct lack of common sense means he should NOT be in public office where the opportunity to continue showing a lack of good judgment abounds.
When you’ve got nothing you bring up global warming and Clinton.
Hypocrisy brought down Vitter, and it will bring you down as well.
Dismissed.
Comment by Zooey — July 10, 2007 @ 11:03 am
You can’t be this stupid, can you?
do you not see the hypocrisy of any left winger who is attacking Vitter based on his sexual escapades?
incredible, you poor retard. You can’t defend Vitter and attack Clinton, and you can’t defend Clinton and attack Vitter.
get a fcking clue and an education. Every time you post on here you bring down the IQ level of this site.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:08 amI’d heard a while back that Bush’s little “faux reporter” Mr. Jeff Guckert -whom Shrubbie dubbed “Gannon” to conceal his real identity….is talking - no doubt he’ll have plenty to say about how those Republitards enjoy their prostitutes - men and women.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:08 amlike Al gore and others tell you and I how to live in order to supposedly safe the planet from the fake Global Warming crap, they live like kings and queens being the biggest consumers on planet Earth.
Comment by Conservatron
With me, it’s less about hypocrisy and MUCH MORE about poor judgment. Your references to Gore don’t apply here.
Vitter can say one thing and do another, that’s hypocrisy.
But showing such a distinct lack of common sense means he should NOT be in public office where the opportunity to continue showing a lack of good judgment abounds.
Comment by SGT Higgins — July 10, 2007 @ 11:08 am
Sgt. Higgins, with all due respect, Al Gore’s references do apply here because it speaks to the great hypocrisy of the left.
and yes, Vitter should resign, I 100% agree. Not because he demanded Clitnon resign but because of what he did.
On the other hand the same Libtards that have always defended Clinton’s infidelities by claiming is a private matter are not the first ones in line attacking Vitter for doing the same thing that they defend Clinton on.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:10 amYou can’t be this stupid, can you?
do you not see the hypocrisy of any left winger who is attacking Vitter based on his sexual escapades?
incredible, you poor retard. You can’t defend Vitter and attack Clinton, and you can’t defend Clinton and attack Vitter.
get a fcking clue and an education. Every time you post on here you bring down the IQ level of this site.
Comment by Conservatron — July 10, 2007 @ 11:08 am
You poor slob - you really don’t have a clue, do you….vis-a-vis your incredibly transparent level of stupidity. I know how awful it is to have this president embarrassing you daily (or more aptly, hourly) and yes, we’d all love to have Clinton back and enjoy that 7 billion dollar surplus once again. But, lo, we must face the reality that we have a moron guiding us who never understood the meaning of fiscal balance…..never had a clue about the necessary moral values which a leader should embody…..doesn’t realize that the people are keeping track of each and every one of his lies…..it must be awful attempting to defend a charlatan…unless, of course, YOU are a charlatan yourself.
Your posts would certainly indicate that this is so. Not only are you a charlatan but you are a highly uneducated one to boot (EMH, by any chance?). Your facts are meaningless, your commentary is inane to downright moronic, and your presence here is unwelcome. Do us all a favor and go cry in some dark isolated corner, Conservatron because that is certainly where you belong.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:13 amOn the other hand the same Libtards that have always defended Clinton’s infidelities by claiming is a private matter are not the first ones in line attacking Vitter for doing the same thing that they defend Clinton on.
Comment by ConservaVirgin — July 10, 2007 @ 11:10 am
I couldn’t have said it better, my lonely friend. I couldn’t have said it better!
July 10th, 2007 at 11:13 amConservatron’s new moniker: Conservaturd!
July 10th, 2007 at 11:14 amThis is to all the … ‘conservative debaters’ trying to hijack this thread with screams about Clinton and hypocracy.
The issue here isn’t about the rightness and wrongness of sex, I suspect, but about the hypocracy of demanding everyone else around you be saintly and faithful (if married) or celebate (if not) while fscking a whore on the side. Yes, Clinton…err, got his tool polished by Lewinski. However, he never got all high and sanctimonious about other people’s sex lives. Therefor, I am able to say, “OK, that was between him, Lewinski, and Mrs. Clinton.” Here is the funny thing.
Vitter has always been a sanctimonious jerkoff who was so interested in sticking his nose into Clinton’s private business. I’d think he was a misguided jerk if he walked the walk while talking the talk, but he couldn’t walk the walk! And now, he’s going to try to brush it under the rug by saying “Oh, I did a bad thing.” He argued that Clinton should have resigned for being caught sticking his piece in Lewinski’s mouth. Why isn’t Vitter resigning? What, it’s perfectly fine and dandy for a Republican Christian to be getting ‘erotic massages’ from a prostitute, but if a Democrat gets his knob waxed by an intern, that democrat should be run out of town on a rail? Pardon my French, but bull$#!+.
If a moderate Republican’s name turns up on the list, and that moderate Republican has never clucked on about the sanctity of marriage, I’ll give him the same pass I gave Clinton. As long as (s)he wasn’t having sex with young girls or young boys, the sex is not an illegal act. But when a sanctimonious @$$hole tells me that I must have sex with my wife only to procreate, not having fun while doing it, and I must do so in the missionary position, and even if both I and my wife decide we want to invite a third woman (or man!) into our bed, we cannot, then I find out that this same sanctimonious @$$ is banging a prostitute, I get mad.
Focus on Your Own Damn Family, leave mine out of it. Thankyouverymuch.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:14 am** Clinton: consensual sex between two adults.
** Vitter: ILLEGAL sex with a paid prostitute.
Same? Not be a longshot.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:14 amBut showing such a distinct lack of common sense means he should NOT be in public office where the opportunity to continue showing a lack of good judgment abounds.
Comment by SGT Higgins — July 10, 2007 @ 11:08 am
That was my argument for not voting for Clinton in 1994. I then, 4 years later, spent 3 months back packing through Europe, talking to the locals and realized that a man’s propensity to cheat is more about his quantity of testosterone and the fact that natural urges are genetically male, than about his decision making abilities. Essentially, decisions about sex are NOT the same as making decisions about public policy. Clinton inevitably went on to prove this is true. Despite his weakness for women, he was a strong leader in public and world policy.
I agree with the hypocrisy rule of measure. It has nothing to do with sex, but everything to do with character.
And Vitter is a hypocrite.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:14 amFunny, I could have sworn the point of the post was Vitter’s hypocrisy in calling for Clinton to resign for cheating on his wife, while failing to do so himself when he was outed.
Yet the troll tries to turn the question of hypocrisy back on liberals, who have never suggested that “affairs” (or hookers) justified resignation.
Better and smarter trolls, please!
July 10th, 2007 at 11:14 amhah….this idiot troll is now attempting to bring Gore into the conservation??
Guess that’s what happens when you have nothing credible to add to any discussion??
July 10th, 2007 at 11:15 amthis story is also a glaring example of Liberal hypocrisy.
Comment by Conservatron — July 10, 2007 @ 10:56 am
Only a rightard-robot like conservatron would look at a story about a Republican who called for the resignation of a President over an extramarital affair (not a crime, BTW) and was later revealed to have patronized the services of a high-priced prostitution ring (which, in most states and territories IS a crime), and decide that it was an example of LIBERAL hypocrisy.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Keep up that stellar reasoning, conservatron — you’re doing the right wing a world of good.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:15 amComment by ConservaVirgin — July 10, 2007 @ 11:10 am
Comment by DRxJ — July 10, 2007 @ 11:13 am
LOL… Good one!
July 10th, 2007 at 11:16 amSgt. Higgins, with all due respect, Al Gore’s references do apply here because it speaks to the great hypocrisy of the left.
Appreciate the respect, but if you don’t see the difference between the size of a guy’s house and sleeping around on your wife, you’re lost.
that have always defended Clinton’s infidelities by claiming is a private matter are not the first ones in line attacking Vitter for doing the same thing that they defend Clinton on.
And you would like what? That the same ‘liberals’ who defended Clinton WERE the first ones attacking Vitter?
Comment by Conservatron
July 10th, 2007 at 11:16 amWhen Corporate whores are your Master and Massage Whores are your ‘recreation’ you deserve every beating you get…
In public.
In private.
In Church.
At work.
At home.
In the media.
$42 million spent by Repukes via Ken Starr, chasing the hope they can embarrass the President.
Dobson, Haggard, Foley, Vitter you can all kiss my ass.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:17 amLet’s all press our congressmen to call for Vitter, the criminal who engaged in illegal activities with a prostitute, to resign from this Congress. We control the purse strings and pay this pig’s salary so we need to begin a full court press now.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:17 amCan it be considered taxpayers money that Vitter paid out for the sexual favors?
July 10th, 2007 at 11:17 am#55. Wrong, again, misinformed one. We’re the party that stripped William Jefferson of his committee membership. And he hasn’t yet been found guilty of anything.
Republican tagline: We claim we’re the party of strong moral values. But don’t take away our prostitutes, straight or gay.
Hahahahaha!
Comment by Republicans Can’t Govern — July 10, 2007 @ 11:04 am
So you admit that your party has no morals or values, eh?
furthemore, you idiot, William Jefferson didn’t strip him of anything until he was formally charged! do you know why? because Congressional rules created by Republicans demand that any Congressmen charged with a crime must be removed from charing any committee and actually resign as a congressman.
Number one was done, but number two wasn’t! so shut the fck up kid. You don’t have a clue about what you are saying.
William Jefferson has been under FBI investigation since Katrina, yet the Democratic party embraced him, and gave him a position of power. Stupid, demented Libtard.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:17 amOn the other hand the same Libtards that have always defended Clinton’s infidelities by claiming is a private matter are not the first ones in line attacking Vitter for doing the same thing that they defend Clinton on.
Comment by Conservatron
No we attack his hypocracy
July 10th, 2007 at 11:18 amThat you cannot see the difference just shows us all your room temperature IQ, Conservatard
#74,
“You know Exley will tear the world apart so he can be right”
Nah….I don’t have to “tear the world apart” to show that I am right, Zooey. I just need to recite the facts — as I did in postings 26 and 63.
My good friend (and fellow baseball fan) DRxJ was inaccurate.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:18 amSgt. Higgins, with all due respect, Al Gore’s references do apply here because it speaks to the great hypocrisy of the left.
Appreciate the respect, but if you don’t see the difference between the size of a guy’s house and sleeping around on your wife, you’re lost.
that have always defended Clinton’s infidelities by claiming is a private matter are not the first ones in line attacking Vitter for doing the same thing that they defend Clinton on.
And you would like what? That the same ‘liberals’ who defended Clinton WERE the first ones attacking Vitter?
Comment by Conservatron
Comment by SGT Higgins — July 10, 2007 @ 11:16 am
I am sorry, that came out wrong. What I ment to say is that the first ones in line to defend Clinton for his infidelities by saying it is a private matter, are the first ones in line to attack Vitter for the same thing they defended Clinton on.
Once again, you can’t defend Clinton and attack Vitter and you can’t defend Vitter and attack Clinton.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:18 amThis country is not finished with Mark Foley yet either. His day will come soon. That investigation was tabled due to more pressing matters like treasonous outing of a CIA covert operative. But Foley, Hastert and Bohner have a long history of knowledge of and/or engagement in inappropriate behavior with the minors involved in the Congressional Page program. Just because other stories may have sidelined this one, it’s far from over. Foley, the whimp, hid out in alcohol rehab for a while but now he’s fair game once again. A full investigation is coming and these three predators and predator-enablers will be brought to justice. It matters little if they are still in office when it comes to breaking laws.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:20 amFrankly it is refreshing to see a Bush/Coulter Republican engaged in heterosexual miscoduct and not badgering minors via the internet.
-GSD
July 10th, 2007 at 11:20 amHow is this thread going on for so long? Not to say I’m not finding most of it entertaining, but still…
July 10th, 2007 at 11:20 amYou can’t be this stupid, can you?
do you not see the hypocrisy of any left winger who is attacking Vitter based on his sexual escapades?
incredible, you poor retard. You can’t defend Vitter and attack Clinton, and you can’t defend Clinton and attack Vitter.
get a fcking clue and an education. Every time you post on here you bring down the IQ level of this site.
Comment by Conservatron
Look at you flailing and twisting like a fool.
What part of “Dismissed” don’t you understand?
July 10th, 2007 at 11:20 amI am sorry, that came out wrong. What I ment to say is that the first ones in line to defend Clinton for his infidelities by saying it is a private matter, are the first ones in line to attack Vitter for the same thing they defended Clinton on.
Comment by Conservatron
Liar. Vitter is being “attacked” for hypocrisy.
You, on the other hand, are being “attacked” for being an idiot.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:21 am** Clinton: consensual sex between two adults.
** Vitter: ILLEGAL sex with a paid prostitute.
Same? Not be a longshot.
Comment by Republicans Can’t Govern — July 10, 2007 @ 11:14 am
Ultimately, that is the bottom line.
I don’t condone what Clinton did. I think he hurt his wife and mostly his daughter. But, even if not ethical in our society, it was consensual and legal… Vitter’s actions, on the other hand, were both unethical AND illegal. Legality being the crux of the matter.
Vitter is equally a hypocrite. Just like Newt.
Hypocrisy - a conservative family value.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:21 amAnd Vitter is a hypocrite.
Comment by unbelievable
Touche’
July 10th, 2007 at 11:21 amUntil reading these posts I hadn’t madea distinction between Clinton and Vitter. The one post pointed out that ne was actively engaged in the ‘marriage’ battle (good point) and the other (and I don’t know why this escaped me) pointed out that one had sex FOR MONEY.
Once again, you can’t defend Clinton and attack Vitter and you can’t defend Vitter and attack Clinton.
Comment by Conservatron — July 10, 2007 @ 11:18 am
Hey Moron! What don’t you understand about Clinton not being the subject of this thread??? You’re more of an idiot than I’d even thought.
As I’ve said, you can only wish that Clinton was president again!!
July 10th, 2007 at 11:21 amIn fact, as I scroll your posts, Conservatron - it’s YOU who brought Clinton into this discussion and “attacked” him so please don’t include any of us for doing so. Get a life, moron.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:22 am* Clinton: consensual sex between two adults.
** Vitter: ILLEGAL sex with a paid prostitute.
Same? Not be a longshot.
Comment by Republicans Can’t Govern — July 10, 2007 @ 11:14 am
AND THIS IS THE BOTTOM LINE. END OF DISCUSSION!
July 10th, 2007 at 11:23 amBetter and smarter trolls, please!
Comment by gummitch — July 10, 2007 @ 11:14 am
Then they wouldn’t be conservatives.
I’ve yet to meet a conservative who could argue on merit. Even the smart ones twist the facts and build strawmen. They have to. Reality has a liberal bias.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:23 amOn the other hand the same Libtards that have always defended Clinton’s infidelities by claiming is a private matter are not the first ones in line attacking Vitter for doing the same thing that they defend Clinton on.
Comment by Conservatron
No we attack his hypocracy
That you cannot see the difference just shows us all your room temperature IQ, Conservatard
Comment by Wayne — July 10, 2007 @ 11:18 am
Wayne, so what you are saying is that Vitter shouldn’t resign, right? I mean if we are going to ask politicians to resign based on hypocrisy, they all, from both sides, resign, right?
and if you are going to talk about hypocrisy, please my friend, the Clintons are masters of the universe when it comes to this deploarble “skill”.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:23 amI said we had better get Bill Clinton’s pen*s under oath immediately.
-Drunken Dan Burton
July 10th, 2007 at 11:23 amConservaturd,
Go take a dump & stare at it for awhile.
Your obvious fixation on feces is fine with us; it’s just not pertinent.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:24 amOnce again, you can’t defend Clinton and attack Vitter and you can’t defend Vitter and attack Clinton.
Comment by Conservatron
Yeah, actually you can…well, maybe YOU can’t..but I can. Read 104
July 10th, 2007 at 11:24 amThe only topic of discussion here is the fact that Vitter engaged in prostitution which, the last time I looked, was highly illegal. As far as the moral issue involved in one who would represent us, that’s another story entirely and for the people to decide. The first issue will be decided in court since he obviously broke the law….and, sorry, but blubbering like a hypocritical idiot in public and uttering empty words only means that you’ve made a perfect fool out of yourself and are still a “criminal” under the law.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:25 amWhy is it that every judgemental prick (rep or dem but normally rep) usually succumbs to the sins they so fervently rally against. Does karma on fast forward when you pass judgement on the activities of your fellow man or just God’s wicked sense of humor.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:25 amIn fact, as I scroll your posts, Conservatron - it’s YOU who brought Clinton into this discussion and “attacked†him so please don’t include any of us for doing so. Get a life, moron.
Comment by veritas — July 10, 2007 @ 11:22 am
You know, my retard veritas, I rarely address you because you are one of the biggest losers and lunatics on this site, full of wide eyed, crazy, black helicopter conspiracy theories. But if you are going to claim that you scroll down my posts and don’t read them, please be honest my retard, ok?
at least try not to be the typical Libtard and lie. It is obvious by your response that you don’t scroll pass my posts, you read them.
fcking retard.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:25 amConservatron
and if you are going to talk about hypocrisy, please my friend, the Clintons are masters of the universe when it comes to this deploarble “skillâ€.
He-Man is the only true “Master of the Universe”, and you would do well to remeber that.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:25 amveritas, of course. The standard Bushbot response about anything that is bad for their Anointed Party ™ is to scream Clinton at the top of their lungs. It does get old quick. But it’s all they know…
July 10th, 2007 at 11:26 amLet’s all press our congressmen to call for Vitter, the criminal who engaged in illegal activities with a prostitute, to resign from this Congress. We control the purse strings and pay this pig’s salary so we need to begin a full court press now.
Comment by veritas — July 10, 2007 @ 11:17 am
We need the same brilliant mindset of the Dem leaders as they had in getting Cheney to own up… So, perhaps cutting the funding to his office for admitting to a federal offense?
July 10th, 2007 at 11:26 am#108 Unbelievable: Reality is Reality; unfortunately, the Republicans believe they can create fiction and call it reality. Doesn’t work that way.
All that exists is truth and in this case, the truth is that Vitter knowingly and willingly engaged in criminal activities.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:26 amUnbelievable: Maybe we won’t have to wait that long. I’ve heard rumors that Cheney’s on the madam’s list from way back.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:27 amSorry Exley, my friend, but I did not post any inaccuracy. You yourself stated that Clinton was found “in contempt of court”. That does not mean he lied. Breaking down the definition, it basically means to “mislead” the court, which the judge ruled that Clinton “attempted” to do.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:27 amLater, under impeachment trials, he was acquitted.
Now, let’s discuss this another time under an appropriate thread, and get back to the task at hand.
In other words, should Vitter resign?
And Vitter is a hypocrite.
Comment by unbelievable
Touche’
Until reading these posts I hadn’t madea distinction between Clinton and Vitter. The one post pointed out that ne was actively engaged in the ‘marriage’ battle (good point) and the other (and I don’t know why this escaped me) pointed out that one had sex FOR MONEY.
Comment by SGT Higgins — July 10, 2007 @ 11:21 am
Sgt, Higgins and Clinton raped women and used his position of power to have sex with women. and he is known to have had sex with prostitutes while he was a governor.
C’mon Sgt Higgins, once again you can’t defend Vitter and attack Clinton and you can’t defend Clinton and attack Vitter.
I agree, Vitter should do what he demanded Clinton do and he should resign and the law should go after him.
But as always it seems that Libtards want to attack Republicans on what they so furiosly defend Clinton on.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:28 amClinton was found in contempt of court in 1999 by U.S. District Judge Susan Webber Wright for giving intentionally false testimony in the Paula Jones civil suit over which she was presiding. — Exley
Yes, the judge ruled him in contempt of court, but did not go as far as suggest perjury charges because the testimony was in a taped deposition.
Clinton was wrong to lie, just like it is wrong for Bush, Gonzo and all the current administration to lie.
Vitter is a lowlife hypocrite, proffessing to being one thing and actually being another.
With sadness I see that Honor and Truth in this country is a dead concept, with everyone in office, Republicans and Democrats alike.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:28 amThe saddest thing is that We the People have given them a pass and helped in the Death of Honor in this country by continually re-electing these lowlife scumbags over and over again.
I on the other hand am consistant(SIC) and he should do what Clinton didn’t do and resign, but Libtards are a bunch of hypocrites.
get a fcking clue and an education. Every time you post on here you bring down the IQ level of this site.
William Jefferson has been under FBI investigation since Katrina, yet the Democratic party embraced him, and gave him a position of power. Stupid, demented Libtard.
Comment sby Conservatron
What does your constipation have to do with Vitter or Clinton, Conservat-ass/howsad/valiantthehater, etc.?
July 10th, 2007 at 11:29 amAnd here I’ve corrected your second sentence for you:
“I should get a fucking clue and an education. Every time I post on here, I grossly bring down the IQ level of this site.
Finally, William Jefferson was not given a chairmanship, despite his seniority, and Democrats have not risen to defend him. But then I realize facts seldom matter to the stupid, demented PAID Republiscum trolls.
Does Vitter pay or pray for blowjobs?
I see, both.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:29 amJeremy: What I find amazing is the utter adulation they have for Mr. Clinton - even after all these years!! It’s clear that they are incredibly jealous and covetous of him on every level. And, since they actually have nothing noteworthy, positive or honest to brag about this administration having accomplished, they refer back to Clinton as though he is still the President.
Now that tells us the level of fear and adulation they have for this man of many accomplishments. Everyone wishes Bush were Clinton, don’t you?
July 10th, 2007 at 11:30 amConservatron
and if you are going to talk about hypocrisy, please my friend, the Clintons are masters of the universe when it comes to this deploarble “skillâ€.
He-Man is the only true “Master of the Universeâ€, and you would do well to remeber that.
Comment by squegeebooo — July 10, 2007 @ 11:25 am
I am sorry, I did not mean to insult He-Man. I whole heartly apologize.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:30 am#104 “…Until reading these posts I hadn’t made a distinction between Clinton and Vitter.”
One had to pay for it, the other one didn’t.
Vitter’s “sin” was damning others for doing the same thing he was doing.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:31 amConservadong,
July 10th, 2007 at 11:31 amI’ve cheated several times and continue to go to church and believe in God. Aren’t those the kind of people that Jesus wanted to continue to come to church? Better brush up on your scripture Dong
#114 It is called the “law of karma” and is well documented. It goes along with the “he who doth protest too much” and the christofascist movement in this country. Sooner or later (perhaps sooner as karma is working quite rapidly these days) they will all receive the ‘karmic payback’ they deserve.
It’s a natural law whether they like it or not. Thankfully, it’s one law they can’t tamper with.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:32 amSgt, Higgins and Clinton raped women and used his position of power to have sex with women. and he is known to have had sex with prostitutes while he was a governor.
Comment by ConservaVirgin — July 10, 2007 @ 11:28 am
Okay, I know that Sgt.Higgins is new here, and is a moderate, I just didn’t know that he forced intercourse on women?
July 10th, 2007 at 11:32 amI mean, c’mon Conserva, do you have proof to back these asinine statements up?
Links, or references would be helpful.
otherwise STFU, and quit your baseless attacks on Clinton and our new poster, Sgt. Higgins
#108 Art: You forgot one key point: Vitter’s sin was damning others who were also engaging in “criminal activities” as was he.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:33 amTouche’ Until reading these posts I hadn’t madea distinction between Clinton and Vitter. The one post pointed out that ne was actively engaged in the ‘marriage’ battle (good point) and the other (and I don’t know why this escaped me) pointed out that one had sex FOR MONEY.
Comment by SGT Higgins — July 10, 2007 @ 11:21 am
We have to be honest about the male sex drive. The right usually has problems doing this, and wants to focus on condemning something that nature created, rather than the legality of his actions. And there is a difference between consensual sex and bought sex in the eyes of our legal system (which I think is silly actually).
Personally, a big part of the ‘moral’ problems we have as a culture come from unrealistic expectations and criticism of basic human nature. Cultures that respect a man’s sex drive tend to not teach women to base their self on their mate or his habits, just in case they pick one who chooses to stray…
For me, it ultimately comes back to getting into a position of accepting reality, and the rest becomes obvious. It’s just hard being realistic in a culture littered with fairy tale ‘happily ever after’ expectations, and a basic disdain for natural human behavior….
July 10th, 2007 at 11:33 amI can see that this thread is being taken down the toilet…..catch everyone later. I don’t have time for such drivel.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:34 amComment by DRxJ — July 10, 2007 @ 11:32 am
ummm DRxJ?
I have a confession to make……… rotflmao
July 10th, 2007 at 11:35 amLouisiana constituents, immediately begin calling Vitter and demanding his resignation for the same reasons he used back in ‘98…
July 10th, 2007 at 11:36 amAll that exists is truth and in this case, the truth is that Vitter knowingly and willingly engaged in criminal activities.
Comment by veritas — July 10, 2007 @ 11:26 am
Bottomline…
Unbelievable: Maybe we won’t have to wait that long. I’ve heard rumors that Cheney’s on the madam’s list from way back.
Comment by veritas — July 10, 2007 @ 11:27 am
Just the thought of it is repulsive… Gag…
July 10th, 2007 at 11:37 amSgt, Higgins and Clinton raped women and used his position of power to have sex with women. and he is known to have had sex with prostitutes while he was a governor.
Comment by ConservaVirgin — July 10, 2007 @ 11:28 am
Okay, I know that Sgt.Higgins is new here, and is a moderate, I just didn’t know that he forced intercourse on women?
I mean, c’mon Conserva, do you have proof to back these asinine statements up?
Links, or references would be helpful.
otherwise STFU, and quit your baseless attacks on Clinton and our new poster, Sgt. Higgins
Comment by DRxJ — July 10, 2007 @ 11:32 am
Better start reading and getting an education, DRxJ. The facts are out there for anyone that is interested to find.
Clinton used his position of powers to rape women, have sex with prostitutes and then he cried when anyone went after him and he had his party and voters defend him. FACT!
Today we have Vitter, he needs to resign, but it is amazing how Libtards are attacking him for the same thing that they defended Clinton on.
finally, Sgt. Higgins is NOT new to this site. Get a clue guy, honestly, get a clue.
and if your claim is that Vitter is a hypocrite, look into your own party’s hypocrisy before you claim Republicans are hypocrites.
Start with those that claim Global Warming is destroying our planet, yet they live like kings and queens….but they want you and I to live like people from the stone age.
Liberalism=hypocrisy. FACT!
July 10th, 2007 at 11:37 amSorry all, I have one more off-topic post:
July 10th, 2007 at 11:38 amThanks Exley for having the ballz to engage me in the “sexual relations” debate.
I’ve tried unsuccessfully to battle the right here with that argument for months, and NOT ONE would step up to the plate, until now.
Your condensending attitudes could be toned down a bit, but hey, that’s you.
Again, thanks for not shying away, and not posting such fluff dramatics as “Libtards” or “moonbats” which add nothing to the debate
Conservadong,
I’ve cheated several times and continue to go to church and believe in God. Aren’t those the kind of people that Jesus wanted to continue to come to church? Better brush up on your scripture Dong
Comment by michael — July 10, 2007 @ 11:31 am
Another Liberal distoring the Bible. Yes, God will tak you back if you repent and sin no more. But committing the same sin over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again…..is not exactly real Christianity.
please get a clue and an education, you will stop being so ignorant.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:39 amSgt, Higgins and Clinton raped women
Comment by Conservatron — July 10, 2007 @ 11:28 am
Slander…
Behave yourself troll. This is unacceptable.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:40 am#94: Conservatron: The same Republican party that CHANGED THE RULES in order to keep Tom Delay in power after he’d been formally charged.
The hypocrisy of the Republican party shows no bounds. Show some true leadership for a change.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:40 amBut committing the same sin over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again…..is not exactly real Christianity.
please get a clue and an education, you will stop being so ignorant.
Comment by Conservatron
So, we can safely assume that God is really, really p*ssed at the GOP then, huh?
July 10th, 2007 at 11:43 amSgt, Higgins and Clinton raped women
Comment by Conservatron — July 10, 2007 @ 11:28 am
Slander…
Behave yourself troll. This is unacceptable.
Comment by unbelievable
No, unbelievable….it’s *sniff* true. We usually worked together…you know, like dolphins chasing the baitfish into shallow water. Can you forgive me?
LMAO — I gotta get some stuff done, bbl.
Oh and finally, Sgt. Higgins is NOT new to this site. Get a clue guy, honestly, get a clue.
Comment by Conservatron
So what constitutes ‘new’? A month now, maybe more. I’ll spot you a clue.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:44 am#94: Conservatron: The same Republican party that CHANGED THE RULES in order to keep Tom Delay in power after he’d been formally charged.
The hypocrisy of the Republican party shows no bounds. Show some true leadership for a change.
Comment by Republicans Can’t Govern — July 10, 2007 @ 11:40 am
what you liar? Tom Delay had to resign based on the rules the Republican party had created!
stop lying my retard.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:44 am#121 DRxJ,
Judge Wright, in a 32-page decision, clearly stated that Clinton gave “intentionally false” testimony about his relationship with Lewinsky in the Paula Jones lawsuit. This historic finding marked the first time that a sitting president has been sanctioned for disobeying a court order.
From the judge’s opinion: “Simply put, the President’s deposition testimony regarding whether he has ever engaged in sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky was intentionally false and his statements regarding whether he had ever engaged in sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky likewise were intentionally false, notwithstanding tortured definitions and interpretations of the term ’sexual relations.’ ”
“Intentionally false” statements are lies.
As for Vitter resigning, I’d say we don’t know enough yet to make that judgment. How often did he frequent the escort service? What did the “services” consist of? How old was the escort?
July 10th, 2007 at 11:45 amNow that tells us the level of fear and adulation they have for this man of many accomplishments. Everyone wishes Bush were Clinton, don’t you?
Comment by veritas
I could explain in detail why you’re wrong, but you won’t get. Let me get to thepoint andjust tell ya you’re full of it.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:45 amplease get a clue and an education, you will stop being so ignorant.
Comment by Conservatron — July 10, 2007 @ 11:39 am
Instead of a mythical god and his son, why can you people be responsible for yourselves?
What is wrong with you that you need an invisible sky daddy to justify your actions? Act like a freaking grown adult already!
July 10th, 2007 at 11:46 am#145. Here you go:
http://www.bloomberg.com/ apps/ news?pid=10000103&sid=aKtUrlQ.Os9g&refer=us
“Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives changed their rules so that Majority Leader Tom DeLay could stay in power if he’s indicted by a Texas grand jury.
The rules change is designed to protect DeLay after three of his political associates were indicted in Texas on charges related to fund-raising for state political campaigns. DeLay, a Republican from Texas, denied any wrongdoing.
On a voice vote, the House Republican Conference changed a rule that required party leaders to step down if indicted for any crime that carries a prison sentence of two or more years.”
EDUCATE YOURSELF, ignorant one.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:47 amHow old was the escort?
Comment by Exley
And when we take into account the fact that Vitter is a Repub, I think we also need to ask: Was the escort female, or male, and was the escort human, or of another species?
July 10th, 2007 at 11:47 amDemocratic posters: here’s a news article proving my assertion.
Conservatron: “Facts come out of my a$$.”
July 10th, 2007 at 11:48 amSgt, Higgins and Clinton raped women
Comment by Conservatron — July 10, 2007 @ 11:28 am
Slander…
Behave yourself troll. This is unacceptable.
Comment by unbelievable — July 10, 2007 @ 11:40 am
another uneducated, wants to sleep with Clinton whore. Please whore, Clinton raped women, slept with prostitutes and used his position of power to seduce women and have sex with them.
amazingly enough the latter one, feminists have forced the government to create laws that forbid this and punish for this. Funny enough Libtards like you defended this pig when he used his position of power to fck women.
stupid Libtard. Man, you are a disgrace and an embarrsment to humanity.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:48 am