“To a certain extent, I thought you might show some sympathy to Wayne’s severely wounded (in Iraq) sister, even if you don’t like him”

He never mentioned to me this fact. BTW I don’t like it when veterans or those who were against the 2003 Iraq invasion demand that we, who disagree with their postion think that they are entitled to respect, when they themselves show absolutely none.

Since your memory is so short…AGAIN, why don’t you do a little research in this thread and pick up on the fact that well before all this debate about who served when and why they didn’t, Wayne said that I had no business demanding that my elected representatives conduct themselves in office as I see fit, which if total crap on his part.

Comment by Lora — July 14, 2007 @ 5:52 am

“and you didn’t even have a mother recovering from cancer and weren’t just 16–Are 16 year olds normally accepted into the military?) so give it up already”

You could have signed up when you tuned 18 and please stop it with your sick mother BS excuse.

“Too scared to take on a man who actually served in the military, Chickenhawk Twit?”

He makes sense and is not conceited like you. BTW he is not too brave to speak to me because he hasn’t responed to my last couple of posts.

“Those who didn’t serve usually were too old, too young, or physically or mentally unfit.”

Please read up on your history because there were alot who chose not to enlist for a variety of reasons. There were thousands of chickenhawks during WW2.

“But if you’re calling me a coward for not serving after high school, then you are almost admitting that you, your wife, the Bush brats, Dick Cheney and millions of other people are cowards.”

Absolutely! I don’t have a problem with admitting that my excuse was lame, but you are so conceited and cowardly that you won’t. BTW your BS excuse for Chelsey Clinton is lame as is your personal one.

“Oh, it takes such courage to make a phone call–almost equivalent to going to Iraq, I suppose. ”

Apparently to make a phone call is quite a bit more than you have.

“…when you constantly defend the Bush brats and their various cousins for not setting a fine example by joining Dumbya’s “noble cause.””

Name me one time I have EVER defended the Bush daughters. You little girl are a liar.

Ps. Funny that you ask why Chelsea Clinton didn’t join the military in peacetime, when you constantly defend the Bush brats and their various cousins for not setting a fine example by joining Dumbya’s “noble cause.”
The biggest hypocrite here is you, big baby Chickenhawk Twit.

Comment by Wayne — July 12, 2007 @ 8:41 am

Would you agree that all of those people that supported the U.S. effort in WW2 that didn’t serve in the military chickenhawks?

Comment by Lora — July 12, 2007 @ 5:56 pm

So she turned 18 in 1998? Why didn’t she join?

Comment by Wayne — July 12, 2007 @ 8:41 am

“Meanwhile these chickenhawks claim to support the troops yet do not condemn the GOP for the deplorable way they treat our wounded and veterans.”

I have done it MULTIPLE times.

“Another thing these chickenhawkers make me sick with is their blatent bigotry.”

I have seen peole do it here and it makes me angry and ill, but I personally have NEVER made a bigoted statment toward any of the peace loving Muslims in this country or abroad.

“Yes Tracy is a hypocrite.”

There are alot of hypocrites in this blog…Lora being one of them.

Comment by Lora — July 12, 2007 @ 3:26 am

“1) This sentence is unintelligible.”

Oh, do I need to explain why I made that statement? If you can’t remember…oh well.

“2) You offered a website, which doesn’t necessarily proved you worked there.”

I gave you a phone number to call. I suggest you do it coward.

“And frankly, I don’t give a damn whether a chickenhawk twit like yourself believe me or not.”

Well good because I don’t belive for a second that what you have worked on is somehow “top secret”. It might be useful but sure as hell isn’t vital to national security.

“You’ve outed your own self as a hypocritical chickenhawk, and all your attempts to attack me and spin it won’t change that fact.”

And you have outed yourself a conceited little girl that doesn’t have the guts to admit that he choice not to join the military is nothing but another lame excuse.

“1) This sentence is unintelligible.”

Oh, do I need to explain why I made that statement? If you can’t remember…oh well.

“2) You offered a website, which doesn’t necessarily proved you worked there.”

I gave you a phone number to call. I suggest you do it coward.

“And frankly, I don’t give a damn whether a chickenhawk twit like yourself believe me or not.”

Well good because I don’t belive for a second that what you have worked on is somehow “top secret”. It might be useful but sure as hell isn’t vital to national security.

“You’ve outed your own self as a hypocritical chickenhawk, and all your attempts to attack me and spin it won’t change that fact.”

And you have outed yourself a conceited little girl that doesn’t have the guts to admit that he choice not to join the military is nothing but another lame excuse.

Comment by Lora — July 12, 2007 @ 3:16 am

“Let me spell it out, since you apparently can’t understand that a scientist and a conservationist might not like this administration’s….”

Might not like? In other words you don’t know. This man was your stepfather did you not know him well to know his politial

“So hold calling the media, because I admitted nothing”

Did you not admit that your excuse not to join right out of highschool was lame? Yes you did:

On not serving right out of high school (I was just 16) or at age 18, we’re even, Chickenhawk Twit, no matter how many times you try to spin it.

“it’s LAME, LAME, LAME!…”

And yours is just as lame, i.e. not joining out of highschool with your sick mother excuse. So like you said we are even. Again you can’t call people who supported the 2003 Iraq invasion chickenhawks and not admit that those who supported the WW2 war effort, who chose not to serve BTW, are also chickenhawks. If you are able please explain the difference. BTW offering your OPINION that one war was noble and saying the other isn’t can’t be a vaild part of your explaination.

I wonder if you have even read any of the earlier comments here. The two main points are Vitter’s hypocrisy in not practicing what he preaches. The second, in contrast to Clinton, whose affair I have never defended, Vitter was doing something illegal (prostitution) in every state but Nevada.
I myself have already written that I found “Hustler” magazine when I took a look at it at someone’s apartment many years ago. Still, I admire Larry Flynt for spending a considerable amount of his own money to out the hypocrites. And in any case, the DC Madam’s telephone number list was apparently sent to 50 sources. Larry Flynt’s operation may have been the first to trace a number to Vitter, but eventually someone else would have discovered it, too, Johnny. Sorry about that.
Finally yes, I feel sorry for Vitter’s wife and family, but that’s partly because they’re living with a hypocrite who tells people to do what he says but not what he does.

Lets play a game? You are a feminist who loves the Democratic party. You may have once burned your bra in an attempt at protest. You may have even done some clam bumping in college out of curiosity. You voted for Bill Clinton because he will change the world and make it a better place. Then comes Larry Flynt, a self procalaimed “womanizer” who has distributed thousands of male orientated magazines around the world, depicting women in ways you would not won’t to see your daughter, mother, sister, etc. He “outs” a few Republicans who sleep with whores, and that makes you all warm and squishy inside. Question? Because you are a feminist, and stand for all that is feminism, do you cheer a a man like Larry Flynt? And if so, why? Do you feel sorry for Mrs. Republican and what her family is going through, her husbands betrayal? Do you say, as was during Clinton’s impeachment, “Oh, it’s there personal business”, and just deny the fact you once turned your back on your feminist views when Clinton was in orifice? Or do you stand up and disclaim a man like Larry Flynt? Or do you just applaud that a Neocon has bit the dust and ignore the fact the man responsible fot it is eveything you despise in your everyday life?

I was going to suggest that TP take up her case occasionally, but I can understand the reason why your sister wouldn’t want the website or other publicity. I’ve read about the retaliation, and I’m sure that there’s more going on.
Anyway, please keep us posted on your sister’s progress, both health-wise and in the legal case.

BTW, conservatard/howsad/vilethehater,various Dem president-wannabes
Chelsea Clinton was born in 1980 and a minor during most of Clinton’s presidency–not that would matter a G(reedy)O(rnery)P(ervert) paid troll like you.
Too bad the Republiscums can’t even find someone who is literate.

Not only are you a stupid person, you are also liar. Typical traits of a Libtard
Comment by conservatard

1) Oh, what a poor excuse. If you could write in proper grammar with good spelling and punctuation, it would come NATURALLY to you. Also, since you are trying so hard to impress us with your superiority, you would actually make an effort to come across literate. You never have, howsad/vilethe hater/conservatard.
Only in your wet dreams do I worship Clinton, probably because no woman in her right mind would have a thing to do with you, ugly dimwit!
Finally, would you care to point out where I have ever lied here, and can you back it up with proof? I didn’t think so.

Faith, Family and Values.