<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Miers Marches To Bush&#8217;s Orders, Elects Not To Appear Before Congress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/11/miers-wont-appear/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/11/miers-wont-appear/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 07:23:51 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: gn</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/11/miers-wont-appear/comment-page-3/#comment-3930896</link>
		<dc:creator>gn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 19:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/11/miers-wont-appear/#comment-3930896</guid>
		<description>As an American living abroad in the UK, I&#039;ve noticed a distinct but implicit, almost to the point of unnoticed, difference in the nature of government.

In the UK, the mere insinuation of social malfeasance can humiliate a public official enough to tender his or her resignation.

However, in the US, the rule of law is supreme.  And thus it is not a case of people acting &quot;in good faith,&quot; but rather of what the law allows them to get away with.  Further, the American societal structure encourages such &quot;deal-making&quot; and often tolerates (even encourages) what would, in other cultures, be professional suicide.

Thus, as many persons have mentioned, the ONLY solution is through a distributed effort to impose ACTION, rather than resort to social pressure in the vain attempts that the persons in questions will recuse themselves out of self-dignity or personal humiliation -- for they have none and could care less, so long as they are acting within the structures sound within their respective legal frameworks (let&#039;s not even get on the topic of what they consider legal).

Thus, action is where the rubber meets the pavement.

1. In Democratic districts, contact your representatives stating that failure to impose the Constitutional checks and balances (and thus bringing impeachment back to the table) WILL constitute a collective loss of votes.  It cannot be a single or even scattered individuals but rather a concerted and directed effort to do mass callings and mailings.  Essentially, to take a page from the Republican playbook, since IT WORKS.

2. In Republican districts, to fight fire with fire.  You have already lost your civil liberties and your ability to trust your government.  So why are you being such a wimp in defending your Constitutional rights?  You are afraid you will lose your dignity and self-respect if you fight dirty, never mind the fact that while you fight clean your enemy is throwing sand in your face seducing your wife and stealing your money behind your back.  Wise up.

3. Always insist on action.  Where does the rubber meet the pavement?  Funding.  Votes.  These must be targeted, as the Republicans have been doing all along.  I&#039;m not saying caging lists, but rather concerted efforts to get out the vote, to pre-emptively inform blacks and latinos and lower-income neighborhoods that they will NOT risk deportation or incarceration when they vote, that they will be approached by intimidating official-looking persons who have NOTHING to do with legitimate government, etc.

4. Be on the offensive.  They&#039;re not going to give you your country back, this great land of ours they have stolen from us.  It is up to use to TAKE IT BACK.  And be aware, they will not relinquish it without a fight.  But do you want your children to grow only ever knowing of the Dream of America as some ancient myth, or as the country it should be and can be?

5. Think pro-actively.  I&#039;m sure there are progressive businessmen and other people of means who would be willing to bankroll a concerted effort to reach out to disenfranchised voters, to participate in the act of democracy, rather than simply relish the usurption of rights through the systematic buying of congressmen. 

Thus, the onus is on creating mechanisms by which the &quot;right thing&quot; is profitable, both to the individual and to society.  

Is this possible?  Only if a dedicated people hold true to their ideals, and only if they are able to spread this vision of America to others.  Can it be done?  I don&#039;t think we have a choice... it MUST be done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an American living abroad in the UK, I&#8217;ve noticed a distinct but implicit, almost to the point of unnoticed, difference in the nature of government.</p>
<p>In the UK, the mere insinuation of social malfeasance can humiliate a public official enough to tender his or her resignation.</p>
<p>However, in the US, the rule of law is supreme.  And thus it is not a case of people acting &#8220;in good faith,&#8221; but rather of what the law allows them to get away with.  Further, the American societal structure encourages such &#8220;deal-making&#8221; and often tolerates (even encourages) what would, in other cultures, be professional suicide.</p>
<p>Thus, as many persons have mentioned, the ONLY solution is through a distributed effort to impose ACTION, rather than resort to social pressure in the vain attempts that the persons in questions will recuse themselves out of self-dignity or personal humiliation &#8212; for they have none and could care less, so long as they are acting within the structures sound within their respective legal frameworks (let&#8217;s not even get on the topic of what they consider legal).</p>
<p>Thus, action is where the rubber meets the pavement.</p>
<p>1. In Democratic districts, contact your representatives stating that failure to impose the Constitutional checks and balances (and thus bringing impeachment back to the table) WILL constitute a collective loss of votes.  It cannot be a single or even scattered individuals but rather a concerted and directed effort to do mass callings and mailings.  Essentially, to take a page from the Republican playbook, since IT WORKS.</p>
<p>2. In Republican districts, to fight fire with fire.  You have already lost your civil liberties and your ability to trust your government.  So why are you being such a wimp in defending your Constitutional rights?  You are afraid you will lose your dignity and self-respect if you fight dirty, never mind the fact that while you fight clean your enemy is throwing sand in your face seducing your wife and stealing your money behind your back.  Wise up.</p>
<p>3. Always insist on action.  Where does the rubber meet the pavement?  Funding.  Votes.  These must be targeted, as the Republicans have been doing all along.  I&#8217;m not saying caging lists, but rather concerted efforts to get out the vote, to pre-emptively inform blacks and latinos and lower-income neighborhoods that they will NOT risk deportation or incarceration when they vote, that they will be approached by intimidating official-looking persons who have NOTHING to do with legitimate government, etc.</p>
<p>4. Be on the offensive.  They&#8217;re not going to give you your country back, this great land of ours they have stolen from us.  It is up to use to TAKE IT BACK.  And be aware, they will not relinquish it without a fight.  But do you want your children to grow only ever knowing of the Dream of America as some ancient myth, or as the country it should be and can be?</p>
<p>5. Think pro-actively.  I&#8217;m sure there are progressive businessmen and other people of means who would be willing to bankroll a concerted effort to reach out to disenfranchised voters, to participate in the act of democracy, rather than simply relish the usurption of rights through the systematic buying of congressmen. </p>
<p>Thus, the onus is on creating mechanisms by which the &#8220;right thing&#8221; is profitable, both to the individual and to society.  </p>
<p>Is this possible?  Only if a dedicated people hold true to their ideals, and only if they are able to spread this vision of America to others.  Can it be done?  I don&#8217;t think we have a choice&#8230; it MUST be done.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3930896', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hopkins</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/11/miers-wont-appear/comment-page-3/#comment-3929867</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hopkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 13:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/11/miers-wont-appear/#comment-3929867</guid>
		<description>When Bush was asked to appear in front of Senate Committe on 911, he refused unless the proceeding was done behind closed door without any official records and his deputy Dick Cheney came along. 

When Miers was asked to appear before Congress to investigate on the firing of public prosecutors, Bush issued an order to refuse the appearance.

When Paul Wilson went out to trash the propaganda of Iraq &amp; Niger Uranium scandal, Bush Administration went out bashing him and leaked the secret of his wife&#039;s CIA connection.

When Scotty Libby was to serve his sentence in prison related to the leak of CIA operative, Bush issued a decree &#039;pardoning&#039; him.

I am sure Christian fundamentalista will continue to argue that he has done nothing wrong (as long as he can issue presidential decree to deny the evidence and witness from appearing). And they are 100% dead right especially when the Democrats are led by someone who argued that impeachment was off the table.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Bush was asked to appear in front of Senate Committe on 911, he refused unless the proceeding was done behind closed door without any official records and his deputy Dick Cheney came along. </p>
<p>When Miers was asked to appear before Congress to investigate on the firing of public prosecutors, Bush issued an order to refuse the appearance.</p>
<p>When Paul Wilson went out to trash the propaganda of Iraq &amp; Niger Uranium scandal, Bush Administration went out bashing him and leaked the secret of his wife&#8217;s CIA connection.</p>
<p>When Scotty Libby was to serve his sentence in prison related to the leak of CIA operative, Bush issued a decree &#8216;pardoning&#8217; him.</p>
<p>I am sure Christian fundamentalista will continue to argue that he has done nothing wrong (as long as he can issue presidential decree to deny the evidence and witness from appearing). And they are 100% dead right especially when the Democrats are led by someone who argued that impeachment was off the table.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3929867', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/11/miers-wont-appear/comment-page-3/#comment-3929044</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 02:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/11/miers-wont-appear/#comment-3929044</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;&quot;I second that, bring her up on â€œinherent contemptâ€ charges. Cut through all this BS the White House is throwing out there to obstruct the truth and get on with it already Congress!&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

I agree and the beauty of this is that it will only take a simple majority in the house.  Let&#039;s do this with both Meiers and Taylor.  Throw their asses in jail and then see if they are willing to talk.

Write Nancy Pelosi and tell her to use &quot;inherent contempt&quot; with both Meiers and Taylor:

http://speaker.gov/contact/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;I second that, bring her up on â€œinherent contemptâ€ charges. Cut through all this BS the White House is throwing out there to obstruct the truth and get on with it already Congress!&#8221;</em></p>
<p>I agree and the beauty of this is that it will only take a simple majority in the house.  Let&#8217;s do this with both Meiers and Taylor.  Throw their asses in jail and then see if they are willing to talk.</p>
<p>Write Nancy Pelosi and tell her to use &#8220;inherent contempt&#8221; with both Meiers and Taylor:</p>
<p><a href="http://speaker.gov/contact/" rel="nofollow">http://speaker.gov/contact/</a><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3929044', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marlow</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/11/miers-wont-appear/comment-page-3/#comment-3929008</link>
		<dc:creator>marlow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 02:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/11/miers-wont-appear/#comment-3929008</guid>
		<description>Wasn&#039;t she one of the melting faces in &quot;Raiders Of The Lost Ark&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t she one of the melting faces in &#8220;Raiders Of The Lost Ark&#8221;?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3929008', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/11/miers-wont-appear/comment-page-3/#comment-3928971</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 02:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/11/miers-wont-appear/#comment-3928971</guid>
		<description>...okay? now THAT is OUR decree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;okay? now THAT is OUR decree.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3928971', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/11/miers-wont-appear/comment-page-3/#comment-3928965</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 02:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/11/miers-wont-appear/#comment-3928965</guid>
		<description>we, the people hereby grant ye, congress permission to...drag her butt back to washington, kicking and screaming, if neccessary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we, the people hereby grant ye, congress permission to&#8230;drag her butt back to washington, kicking and screaming, if neccessary.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3928965', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W.Clements</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/11/miers-wont-appear/comment-page-3/#comment-3928954</link>
		<dc:creator>W.Clements</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 02:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/11/miers-wont-appear/#comment-3928954</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not going to hold my breath on that contempt citation, but maybe Conyers will surprise us all and actually kick some ass!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not going to hold my breath on that contempt citation, but maybe Conyers will surprise us all and actually kick some ass!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3928954', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Probus</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/11/miers-wont-appear/comment-page-3/#comment-3928884</link>
		<dc:creator>Probus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 01:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/11/miers-wont-appear/#comment-3928884</guid>
		<description>Both Bush and Miers can&#039;t hide behind executive privilege. Miers has to testify. Bush is not above the law, and neither is she. Also if she doesn&#039;t show up then Conyers should take steps to hold her in contempt of Congress. Bush should not be able to tell former White House officials what to say. They no longer work for him. Clearly Bush is trying to cover his tracks. It would create problems for him and other White House officials if it came to light that he had discussions with Gonzales about the US attorney firings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both Bush and Miers can&#8217;t hide behind executive privilege. Miers has to testify. Bush is not above the law, and neither is she. Also if she doesn&#8217;t show up then Conyers should take steps to hold her in contempt of Congress. Bush should not be able to tell former White House officials what to say. They no longer work for him. Clearly Bush is trying to cover his tracks. It would create problems for him and other White House officials if it came to light that he had discussions with Gonzales about the US attorney firings.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3928884', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kefa461</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/11/miers-wont-appear/comment-page-3/#comment-3928710</link>
		<dc:creator>kefa461</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 00:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/11/miers-wont-appear/#comment-3928710</guid>
		<description>A way to contact the committee....

http://judiciary.house.gov/Contact.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A way to contact the committee&#8230;.</p>
<p><a href="http://judiciary.house.gov/Contact.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://judiciary.house.gov/Contact.aspx</a><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3928710', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nuQler ostrich</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/11/miers-wont-appear/comment-page-3/#comment-3928542</link>
		<dc:creator>nuQler ostrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 23:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/11/miers-wont-appear/#comment-3928542</guid>
		<description>Re: 95

Flood Pelosi with letters quoting USC 18 Sec 1505 &amp; 1515(b) demanding impeachment for these felonies.

Mine is already hand written and waiting in the out box.

I&#039;m sending mine with a ($1.00) return reciept.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: 95</p>
<p>Flood Pelosi with letters quoting USC 18 Sec 1505 &amp; 1515(b) demanding impeachment for these felonies.</p>
<p>Mine is already hand written and waiting in the out box.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sending mine with a ($1.00) return reciept.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3928542', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leporello</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/11/miers-wont-appear/comment-page-2/#comment-3928490</link>
		<dc:creator>leporello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 23:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/11/miers-wont-appear/#comment-3928490</guid>
		<description>Kefa461, sorry I meant #95.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kefa461, sorry I meant #95.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3928490', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leporello</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/11/miers-wont-appear/comment-page-2/#comment-3928479</link>
		<dc:creator>leporello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 23:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/11/miers-wont-appear/#comment-3928479</guid>
		<description>Kefa461, #96, that is a brilliant observation. Lets just hope that someone, Anyone gets this particular ball rolling!
 Impeach Bush and Cheney and Save the Constitution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kefa461, #96, that is a brilliant observation. Lets just hope that someone, Anyone gets this particular ball rolling!<br />
 Impeach Bush and Cheney and Save the Constitution.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3928479', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RUCerious</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/11/miers-wont-appear/comment-page-2/#comment-3928318</link>
		<dc:creator>RUCerious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 22:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/11/miers-wont-appear/#comment-3928318</guid>
		<description>Time to throw the book. With all your might Congress. If they won&#039;t appear, use the courts to force their testimony, or impeach both Cheney or Bush.
Do something. Don&#039;t just sit there like a damn slug in the headlights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time to throw the book. With all your might Congress. If they won&#8217;t appear, use the courts to force their testimony, or impeach both Cheney or Bush.<br />
Do something. Don&#8217;t just sit there like a damn slug in the headlights.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3928318', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/11/miers-wont-appear/comment-page-2/#comment-3928247</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 22:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/11/miers-wont-appear/#comment-3928247</guid>
		<description>I was hoping that she would show up wearing her jaunty Keith Richards eye liner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was hoping that she would show up wearing her jaunty Keith Richards eye liner.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3928247', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Green Party</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/11/miers-wont-appear/comment-page-2/#comment-3928232</link>
		<dc:creator>Green Party</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 22:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/11/miers-wont-appear/#comment-3928232</guid>
		<description>I second that, bring her up on &quot;inherent contempt&quot; charges. Cut through all this BS the White House is throwing out there to obstruct the truth and get on with it already Congress!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second that, bring her up on &#8220;inherent contempt&#8221; charges. Cut through all this BS the White House is throwing out there to obstruct the truth and get on with it already Congress!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3928232', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kefa461</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/11/miers-wont-appear/comment-page-2/#comment-3928226</link>
		<dc:creator>kefa461</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 22:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/11/miers-wont-appear/#comment-3928226</guid>
		<description>18 U.S.C. Sec. 1505 : ... Whoever corruptly ... influences, obstructs, or impedes ... the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress ... [s]hall be fined under this title, [or] imprisoned not more than 5 years ... or both.

Has The Prez not broken a law here???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>18 U.S.C. Sec. 1505 : &#8230; Whoever corruptly &#8230; influences, obstructs, or impedes &#8230; the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress &#8230; [s]hall be fined under this title, [or] imprisoned not more than 5 years &#8230; or both.</p>
<p>Has The Prez not broken a law here???<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3928226', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark harvey</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/11/miers-wont-appear/comment-page-2/#comment-3928195</link>
		<dc:creator>mark harvey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 22:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/11/miers-wont-appear/#comment-3928195</guid>
		<description>Suggest to Congress if Miers fails to show to proceed with INHERENT CONTEMPT.  It bypasses Bush appointed US Attorneys and goes directly to the House for trial:

&quot;Under this process, the procedure for holding a person in contempt involves only the chamber concerned. Following a contempt citation, the person cited for contempt is arrested by the Sergeant-at-Arms for the House or Senate, brought to the floor of the chamber, held to answer charges by the presiding officer, and then subject to punishment that the House may dictate (usually imprisonment for punishment reasons, imprisonment for coercive effect, or release from the contempt citation.)&quot;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contempt_of_Congress</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suggest to Congress if Miers fails to show to proceed with INHERENT CONTEMPT.  It bypasses Bush appointed US Attorneys and goes directly to the House for trial:</p>
<p>&#8220;Under this process, the procedure for holding a person in contempt involves only the chamber concerned. Following a contempt citation, the person cited for contempt is arrested by the Sergeant-at-Arms for the House or Senate, brought to the floor of the chamber, held to answer charges by the presiding officer, and then subject to punishment that the House may dictate (usually imprisonment for punishment reasons, imprisonment for coercive effect, or release from the contempt citation.)&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contempt_of_Congress" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contempt_of_Congress</a><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3928195', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OutSourced</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/11/miers-wont-appear/comment-page-2/#comment-3928186</link>
		<dc:creator>OutSourced</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 21:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/11/miers-wont-appear/#comment-3928186</guid>
		<description>Bush, like Lear, can yell into the wind all he wants.  But unless he legally compels someone who has received a Congressional subpoena not to testify, such as by obtaining a court order, than anyone who fails to testify to Congress is voluntarily choosing not to testify and is, therefore, breaking the law.  

Bush won&#039;t do that because then he&#039;d have to explain in court his reasons - and get the court to agree with him.  That raises a vulnerability this administration has consistely avoided.  Should a federal district judge such as oh, Judge Walton, not agree with Shrub, that decision opens a huge can of worms, forcing Shrub to appeal to the DC Circuit.  Even though it&#039;s now a conservative old boys&#039; club, it still might not agree with Shrub; ditto even Roberts&#039; S.Ct.

The only other way for Harriet legitimately to avoid testifying is by invoking her Fifth Amendment privilege not to incriminate herself in a criminal matter.  Should she raise that defense, it would have the concurrent effect of knocking down most of Bush&#039;s privilege claims, since most of them do not trump the need to investigate crimes.  

Congress needs to take the gloves off.  Its popularity is dropping precisely because they haven&#039;t done so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bush, like Lear, can yell into the wind all he wants.  But unless he legally compels someone who has received a Congressional subpoena not to testify, such as by obtaining a court order, than anyone who fails to testify to Congress is voluntarily choosing not to testify and is, therefore, breaking the law.  </p>
<p>Bush won&#8217;t do that because then he&#8217;d have to explain in court his reasons &#8211; and get the court to agree with him.  That raises a vulnerability this administration has consistely avoided.  Should a federal district judge such as oh, Judge Walton, not agree with Shrub, that decision opens a huge can of worms, forcing Shrub to appeal to the DC Circuit.  Even though it&#8217;s now a conservative old boys&#8217; club, it still might not agree with Shrub; ditto even Roberts&#8217; S.Ct.</p>
<p>The only other way for Harriet legitimately to avoid testifying is by invoking her Fifth Amendment privilege not to incriminate herself in a criminal matter.  Should she raise that defense, it would have the concurrent effect of knocking down most of Bush&#8217;s privilege claims, since most of them do not trump the need to investigate crimes.  </p>
<p>Congress needs to take the gloves off.  Its popularity is dropping precisely because they haven&#8217;t done so.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3928186', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald Reagan and Master Satan</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/11/miers-wont-appear/comment-page-2/#comment-3928154</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald Reagan and Master Satan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 21:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/11/miers-wont-appear/#comment-3928154</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;My Veep, Bush 41 was the BIGGEST TRAITOR of all, pardoning an INTERNATIONAL TERRORIST named Orlando Bosch,

and all of the Iran/Contra WAR CRIMINALS now in Bush 43&#039;s administration AND the PNAC...

To save HIS azz and MINE from IMPEACHMENT and TREASON trials...

Now, I&#039;m DEAD and in HELL for my WAR CRIMES and LIES.

Master Satan says the Bushes and Cheneys will be here soon.

He LOVES their EVIL so so MUCH!!!


Treasonously yours from the pits of hell,

Traitor Ronnie and my Master Satan&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>My Veep, Bush 41 was the BIGGEST TRAITOR of all, pardoning an INTERNATIONAL TERRORIST named Orlando Bosch,</p>
<p>and all of the Iran/Contra WAR CRIMINALS now in Bush 43&#8217;s administration AND the PNAC&#8230;</p>
<p>To save HIS azz and MINE from IMPEACHMENT and TREASON trials&#8230;</p>
<p>Now, I&#8217;m DEAD and in HELL for my WAR CRIMES and LIES.</p>
<p>Master Satan says the Bushes and Cheneys will be here soon.</p>
<p>He LOVES their EVIL so so MUCH!!!</p>
<p>Treasonously yours from the pits of hell,</p>
<p>Traitor Ronnie and my Master Satan</strong><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3928154', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: willyloman</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/11/miers-wont-appear/comment-page-2/#comment-3928145</link>
		<dc:creator>willyloman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 21:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/11/miers-wont-appear/#comment-3928145</guid>
		<description>One look at Scooter and all you would have to do is show him a picture of a pair of pliers in a Sears cataloge and he would piss himself and start squealing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One look at Scooter and all you would have to do is show him a picture of a pair of pliers in a Sears cataloge and he would piss himself and start squealing.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3928145', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
