<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Senate conservatives rush to Cheney&#8217;s defense.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/12/senate-conservatives-rush-to-cheneys-defense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/12/senate-conservatives-rush-to-cheneys-defense/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:31:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Probus</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/12/senate-conservatives-rush-to-cheneys-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-3932149</link>
		<dc:creator>Probus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 23:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/12/senate-conservatives-rush-to-cheneys-defense/#comment-3932149</guid>
		<description>As long as Cheney refuses to obey the law his office should not be funded. He is not above the law. Cheney is clearly a member of the &lt;strong&gt;executive branch&lt;/strong&gt;, and is not in any way a member of the legislative branch. If he wants to be funded he must comply with this order which applies to his office and all entities not just agencies has he has wrongly claimed. If he doesn&#039;t comply Congress must investigate this. If possible a special prosecutor should be appointed to investigate this like Plamegate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as Cheney refuses to obey the law his office should not be funded. He is not above the law. Cheney is clearly a member of the <strong>executive branch</strong>, and is not in any way a member of the legislative branch. If he wants to be funded he must comply with this order which applies to his office and all entities not just agencies has he has wrongly claimed. If he doesn&#8217;t comply Congress must investigate this. If possible a special prosecutor should be appointed to investigate this like Plamegate.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3932149', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: criticalthinker</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/12/senate-conservatives-rush-to-cheneys-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-3930492</link>
		<dc:creator>criticalthinker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 17:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/12/senate-conservatives-rush-to-cheneys-defense/#comment-3930492</guid>
		<description>Can the President write an exectutive order like this:

People whose skin absorbs more light than it reflects HAVE TO comply with this order, while people whose skin reflects more light than it absorbs DO NOT HAVE TO comply with this order.

Just because he can can issue an executive order does not mean that he can issue ones with &quot;illogical&quot; selective enforcement!

Who came up with the CRAZY idea that if something is not explicitly spelled out as being illegal is automatically legal?


If the president and vice president do not have to comply with an executive order, the presdient should state and explain why when issuing the order.

Even though he is the one that issues executive orders, he should not be reinterpeting them after the fact, instead he should cancel the old executive order and issue a new executive order.

But using suspect and unethical legal &quot;technicalities&quot; is Standard Operationg Procedure for the current CRIMINAL administration!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can the President write an exectutive order like this:</p>
<p>People whose skin absorbs more light than it reflects HAVE TO comply with this order, while people whose skin reflects more light than it absorbs DO NOT HAVE TO comply with this order.</p>
<p>Just because he can can issue an executive order does not mean that he can issue ones with &#8220;illogical&#8221; selective enforcement!</p>
<p>Who came up with the CRAZY idea that if something is not explicitly spelled out as being illegal is automatically legal?</p>
<p>If the president and vice president do not have to comply with an executive order, the presdient should state and explain why when issuing the order.</p>
<p>Even though he is the one that issues executive orders, he should not be reinterpeting them after the fact, instead he should cancel the old executive order and issue a new executive order.</p>
<p>But using suspect and unethical legal &#8220;technicalities&#8221; is Standard Operationg Procedure for the current CRIMINAL administration!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3930492', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: willyloman</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/12/senate-conservatives-rush-to-cheneys-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-3930485</link>
		<dc:creator>willyloman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 17:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/12/senate-conservatives-rush-to-cheneys-defense/#comment-3930485</guid>
		<description>http://www.c-span.org/watch/cs_cspan3_wm.asp?Cat=TV&amp;Code=CS3

c-span 3 on Cheney&#039;s creation of new &quot;secret&quot; classification investigation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.c-span.org/watch/cs_cspan3_wm.asp?Cat=TV&amp;Code=CS3" rel="nofollow">http://www.c-span.org/watch/cs_cspan3_wm.asp?Cat=TV&amp;Code=CS3</a></p>
<p>c-span 3 on Cheney&#8217;s creation of new &#8220;secret&#8221; classification investigation.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3930485', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KingCranky</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/12/senate-conservatives-rush-to-cheneys-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-3930464</link>
		<dc:creator>KingCranky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 17:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/12/senate-conservatives-rush-to-cheneys-defense/#comment-3930464</guid>
		<description>Watch how loudly the GOP will be clamoring to rein in all those unchecked powers-found nowhere in the Constitution-the next President will be set to take from W&#039;s precedents the closer we get to the November 2008 elections

A President Hillary, with the same unchecked powers W&#039;s trying to grant himself, and the ability to warrantlessly spy on, say, the NRA, is absolute anathema to W&#039;s GOP &amp; Lunatic Neocon Enablers

It&#039;s only W with these powers that&#039;s acceptable to the dead-end 26%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watch how loudly the GOP will be clamoring to rein in all those unchecked powers-found nowhere in the Constitution-the next President will be set to take from W&#8217;s precedents the closer we get to the November 2008 elections</p>
<p>A President Hillary, with the same unchecked powers W&#8217;s trying to grant himself, and the ability to warrantlessly spy on, say, the NRA, is absolute anathema to W&#8217;s GOP &amp; Lunatic Neocon Enablers</p>
<p>It&#8217;s only W with these powers that&#8217;s acceptable to the dead-end 26%<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3930464', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dantheman</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/12/senate-conservatives-rush-to-cheneys-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-3930236</link>
		<dc:creator>dantheman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 16:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/12/senate-conservatives-rush-to-cheneys-defense/#comment-3930236</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s unbelievable that Republicans will publicly defend a man who violates our laws, and the MSM says nothing substantive about it. When are we going to hold the press accoutable? Anybody for a boycott?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s unbelievable that Republicans will publicly defend a man who violates our laws, and the MSM says nothing substantive about it. When are we going to hold the press accoutable? Anybody for a boycott?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3930236', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: funky p</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/12/senate-conservatives-rush-to-cheneys-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-3930154</link>
		<dc:creator>funky p</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 16:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/12/senate-conservatives-rush-to-cheneys-defense/#comment-3930154</guid>
		<description>Iâ€™m not disputing that this admin and plenty of other elected Reps have severely damanged this country, but any president should have the right to interpret his executive orders as he sees fit. Theyâ€™re his orders. Congress should not intervene like this.
Maybe Iâ€™m wrong, but Congress has no hand in the enforcement of executive orders. Thatâ€™s strictly the job of the executive itself.

Comment by Wilco â€” July 12, 2007 @ 11:56 am

Did you read Bob&#039;s comment. Comment by Bob â€” July 12, 2007 @ 11:50 am
 That nailed it; thanks Bob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iâ€™m not disputing that this admin and plenty of other elected Reps have severely damanged this country, but any president should have the right to interpret his executive orders as he sees fit. Theyâ€™re his orders. Congress should not intervene like this.<br />
Maybe Iâ€™m wrong, but Congress has no hand in the enforcement of executive orders. Thatâ€™s strictly the job of the executive itself.</p>
<p>Comment by Wilco â€” July 12, 2007 @ 11:56 am</p>
<p>Did you read Bob&#8217;s comment. Comment by Bob â€” July 12, 2007 @ 11:50 am<br />
 That nailed it; thanks Bob<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3930154', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilco</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/12/senate-conservatives-rush-to-cheneys-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-3930110</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/12/senate-conservatives-rush-to-cheneys-defense/#comment-3930110</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not disputing that this admin and plenty of other elected Reps have severely damanged this country, but any president should have the right to interpret his executive orders as he sees fit.  They&#039;re his orders.  Congress should not intervene like this.  
Maybe I&#039;m wrong, but Congress has no hand in the enforcement of executive orders.  That&#039;s strictly the job of the executive itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not disputing that this admin and plenty of other elected Reps have severely damanged this country, but any president should have the right to interpret his executive orders as he sees fit.  They&#8217;re his orders.  Congress should not intervene like this.<br />
Maybe I&#8217;m wrong, but Congress has no hand in the enforcement of executive orders.  That&#8217;s strictly the job of the executive itself.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3930110', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilco</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/12/senate-conservatives-rush-to-cheneys-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-3930100</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/12/senate-conservatives-rush-to-cheneys-defense/#comment-3930100</guid>
		<description>Paul B, I get your point, but what&#039;s the point in going after this?
Wouldn&#039;t it just take an addendum or a new executive order then to state Cheney is excluded?  
And who is going to enforce the original order?  
The Nat&#039;l Archives are run by the Executive.  They would have to appeal to the executive if anyone defied the executive order.  How far would they get?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul B, I get your point, but what&#8217;s the point in going after this?<br />
Wouldn&#8217;t it just take an addendum or a new executive order then to state Cheney is excluded?<br />
And who is going to enforce the original order?<br />
The Nat&#8217;l Archives are run by the Executive.  They would have to appeal to the executive if anyone defied the executive order.  How far would they get?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3930100', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/12/senate-conservatives-rush-to-cheneys-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-3930091</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/12/senate-conservatives-rush-to-cheneys-defense/#comment-3930091</guid>
		<description>He came out and stated the order didnâ€™t apply to Cheneyâ€™s office. Iâ€™m not defending Bush, but respecting precedent. It seems counterproductive to take this course, just more politics.

Comment by Wilco â€” July 12, 2007 @ 11:37 am

Yea, what like three years after the order was written?  He also excluded his own office even though that office has complied with the order.  They are just reto-fitting the order to agree with their procedure.  Much like when they violated the law for warrentless wiretapping then had Congress re-write the law so what they do is no longer illegal.

Again, republicans are criminals, and there is plenty of proof that they are damaging the Rule of Law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He came out and stated the order didnâ€™t apply to Cheneyâ€™s office. Iâ€™m not defending Bush, but respecting precedent. It seems counterproductive to take this course, just more politics.</p>
<p>Comment by Wilco â€” July 12, 2007 @ 11:37 am</p>
<p>Yea, what like three years after the order was written?  He also excluded his own office even though that office has complied with the order.  They are just reto-fitting the order to agree with their procedure.  Much like when they violated the law for warrentless wiretapping then had Congress re-write the law so what they do is no longer illegal.</p>
<p>Again, republicans are criminals, and there is plenty of proof that they are damaging the Rule of Law.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3930091', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaulB</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/12/senate-conservatives-rush-to-cheneys-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-3930085</link>
		<dc:creator>PaulB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/12/senate-conservatives-rush-to-cheneys-defense/#comment-3930085</guid>
		<description>&quot;&lt;i&gt;Not to sound too trollish, but didnâ€™t the Veep admit heâ€™s in the executive?&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

I don&#039;t think so.  If I recall correctly, all that happened is that his spokesman changed tactics and stated that Cheney simply was not covered by this executive order.  I don&#039;t think they ever admitted just how foolish their original claim was nor did they back off from it; they just quietly stopped making it.

&quot;&lt;i&gt;And isnâ€™t it the President who dictates terms of his own orders?&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Well, yes and no.  If his original order had clearly stated that his office and Cheney&#039;s office were not involved, Cheney would be in the clear.  It didn&#039;t, though, which means that you have to go by the plain meaning of the text, which means that Cheney&#039;s office is clearly covered.  After-the-fact &quot;reinterpretation&quot; of existing executive orders is one of those gray areas, particularly when that reinterpretation defies common sense and a plain reading of the text.  I suspect Cheney is on pretty shaky ground.

&quot;&lt;i&gt;It seems counterproductive to take this course, just more politics.&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Of course it&#039;s politics.  I&#039;ll go even farther and state that it&#039;s political theater, not really intended to win, necessarily.  What it is designed to do is to highlight the silliness of Cheney&#039;s claims and the lawlessness of the current administration.  On that score, I think it succeeds admirably.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<i>Not to sound too trollish, but didnâ€™t the Veep admit heâ€™s in the executive?</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think so.  If I recall correctly, all that happened is that his spokesman changed tactics and stated that Cheney simply was not covered by this executive order.  I don&#8217;t think they ever admitted just how foolish their original claim was nor did they back off from it; they just quietly stopped making it.</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>And isnâ€™t it the President who dictates terms of his own orders?</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, yes and no.  If his original order had clearly stated that his office and Cheney&#8217;s office were not involved, Cheney would be in the clear.  It didn&#8217;t, though, which means that you have to go by the plain meaning of the text, which means that Cheney&#8217;s office is clearly covered.  After-the-fact &#8220;reinterpretation&#8221; of existing executive orders is one of those gray areas, particularly when that reinterpretation defies common sense and a plain reading of the text.  I suspect Cheney is on pretty shaky ground.</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>It seems counterproductive to take this course, just more politics.</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Of course it&#8217;s politics.  I&#8217;ll go even farther and state that it&#8217;s political theater, not really intended to win, necessarily.  What it is designed to do is to highlight the silliness of Cheney&#8217;s claims and the lawlessness of the current administration.  On that score, I think it succeeds admirably.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3930085', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilco</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/12/senate-conservatives-rush-to-cheneys-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-3930084</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/12/senate-conservatives-rush-to-cheneys-defense/#comment-3930084</guid>
		<description>funky p, 
in this particular instance, what law has the veep violated?  He&#039;s refusing to follow an executive order that doesn&#039;t apply to him?
I don&#039;t get it.  
I know, I know, he&#039;s a horrible person!
I completely agree!  
He shot his friend in the face, and his friend apologized to HIM!
I&#039;d love to see him out of office.  I can&#039;t wait for 08.  
but in this instance, he&#039;s broken no law I know of.  And that&#039;s the issue at hand, right?
If the Dems want him gone, don&#039;t pussyfoot around it by defunding his office, just impeach the man!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>funky p,<br />
in this particular instance, what law has the veep violated?  He&#8217;s refusing to follow an executive order that doesn&#8217;t apply to him?<br />
I don&#8217;t get it.<br />
I know, I know, he&#8217;s a horrible person!<br />
I completely agree!<br />
He shot his friend in the face, and his friend apologized to HIM!<br />
I&#8217;d love to see him out of office.  I can&#8217;t wait for 08.<br />
but in this instance, he&#8217;s broken no law I know of.  And that&#8217;s the issue at hand, right?<br />
If the Dems want him gone, don&#8217;t pussyfoot around it by defunding his office, just impeach the man!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3930084', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: funky p</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/12/senate-conservatives-rush-to-cheneys-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-3930072</link>
		<dc:creator>funky p</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/12/senate-conservatives-rush-to-cheneys-defense/#comment-3930072</guid>
		<description>#

Not to sound too trollish, but didnâ€™t the Veep admit heâ€™s in the executive?
And isnâ€™t it the President who dictates terms of his own orders? He came out and stated the order didnâ€™t apply to Cheneyâ€™s office. Iâ€™m not defending Bush, but respecting precedent. It seems counterproductive to take this course, just more politics.

Comment by Wilco â€” July 12, 2007 @ 11:37 am

You &lt;strong&gt;do&lt;/strong&gt; sound trollish.
The VP has violated the law. Both the President and Vice President have violated their oaths of office...kind of like lying while taking an oath, so not so unlike lying &lt;em&gt;under&lt;/em&gt; oath. They swore to protect and defend the constitution, while fully intending to do no such thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#</p>
<p>Not to sound too trollish, but didnâ€™t the Veep admit heâ€™s in the executive?<br />
And isnâ€™t it the President who dictates terms of his own orders? He came out and stated the order didnâ€™t apply to Cheneyâ€™s office. Iâ€™m not defending Bush, but respecting precedent. It seems counterproductive to take this course, just more politics.</p>
<p>Comment by Wilco â€” July 12, 2007 @ 11:37 am</p>
<p>You <strong>do</strong> sound trollish.<br />
The VP has violated the law. Both the President and Vice President have violated their oaths of office&#8230;kind of like lying while taking an oath, so not so unlike lying <em>under</em> oath. They swore to protect and defend the constitution, while fully intending to do no such thing.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3930072', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaulB</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/12/senate-conservatives-rush-to-cheneys-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-3930071</link>
		<dc:creator>PaulB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/12/senate-conservatives-rush-to-cheneys-defense/#comment-3930071</guid>
		<description>&quot;&lt;i&gt;Go ahead dems, push this ridiculous measure all the way, make it front-page news&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Man, I hope they do.  It will highlight the lawlessness of this administration and Cheney&#039;s silliness in even pretending that he&#039;s not part of the Executive Branch.

&quot;&lt;i&gt;because Americans dont give one shiite about things like this&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Actually, they do, which is why Cheney&#039;s numbers are in the tank and why, based on some polls, the majority of Americans want Cheney impeached.

&quot;&lt;i&gt;its why the congressional numbers are in the tank.&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Nope.  Congressional numbers are in the tank primarily because Democrats and Independents are disappointed that Congressional Democrats aren&#039;t going after Bush and Cheney aggressively enough.

&quot;&lt;i&gt;Keep getting NOTHING done as you have done so far in your dem-controlled houses&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Actually, the Democratically controlled House has been quite successful at getting legislation passed.  The Senate, on the other hand, plays by different rules and Republican Senators have been quite successful at blocking nearly all legislation.  They&#039;re even quite proud of this and have publicly bragged about it.  The problem for them is that the legislation they are blocking is, for the most part, quite popular, which means that the attack ads pretty much write themselves.  It will be interesting to see how their tactics change as we get closer to the 2008 election.

&quot;&lt;i&gt;and watch what happens. Sink or swim, as you say, and Ill have fun watching the hysterical splashing.&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

LOL...  I don&#039;t think those splashing will be who you think they are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<i>Go ahead dems, push this ridiculous measure all the way, make it front-page news</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Man, I hope they do.  It will highlight the lawlessness of this administration and Cheney&#8217;s silliness in even pretending that he&#8217;s not part of the Executive Branch.</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>because Americans dont give one shiite about things like this</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually, they do, which is why Cheney&#8217;s numbers are in the tank and why, based on some polls, the majority of Americans want Cheney impeached.</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>its why the congressional numbers are in the tank.</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Nope.  Congressional numbers are in the tank primarily because Democrats and Independents are disappointed that Congressional Democrats aren&#8217;t going after Bush and Cheney aggressively enough.</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>Keep getting NOTHING done as you have done so far in your dem-controlled houses</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually, the Democratically controlled House has been quite successful at getting legislation passed.  The Senate, on the other hand, plays by different rules and Republican Senators have been quite successful at blocking nearly all legislation.  They&#8217;re even quite proud of this and have publicly bragged about it.  The problem for them is that the legislation they are blocking is, for the most part, quite popular, which means that the attack ads pretty much write themselves.  It will be interesting to see how their tactics change as we get closer to the 2008 election.</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>and watch what happens. Sink or swim, as you say, and Ill have fun watching the hysterical splashing.</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>LOL&#8230;  I don&#8217;t think those splashing will be who you think they are.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3930071', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilco</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/12/senate-conservatives-rush-to-cheneys-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-3930059</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/12/senate-conservatives-rush-to-cheneys-defense/#comment-3930059</guid>
		<description>Mind you, I think the Nat&#039;l Archives should be allowed in.  I don&#039;t see any reason why they shouldn&#039;t be given access to determine that proper procedures are in place to keep classified information classified.  
It was Cheney himself who had a spy in his office!  You&#039;d think this would be a priority for him.
Well, for any other veep, that is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mind you, I think the Nat&#8217;l Archives should be allowed in.  I don&#8217;t see any reason why they shouldn&#8217;t be given access to determine that proper procedures are in place to keep classified information classified.<br />
It was Cheney himself who had a spy in his office!  You&#8217;d think this would be a priority for him.<br />
Well, for any other veep, that is.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3930059', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/12/senate-conservatives-rush-to-cheneys-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-3930056</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/12/senate-conservatives-rush-to-cheneys-defense/#comment-3930056</guid>
		<description>If it was the last admin they would have been impeached years ago.  Like for allowing 9/11: not sufficiently protecting the citizens of the United States, failing to uphold the Constitution.

Of course there is no way a republican congress would allow Al Gore so much secret power as VP, but of course they will filibuster any atempt to quell the power that Cheney falsely claims.  They must be glad they didn&#039;t go with the &#039;nuclear option&#039; (that was never really an option--it was an idle threat).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it was the last admin they would have been impeached years ago.  Like for allowing 9/11: not sufficiently protecting the citizens of the United States, failing to uphold the Constitution.</p>
<p>Of course there is no way a republican congress would allow Al Gore so much secret power as VP, but of course they will filibuster any atempt to quell the power that Cheney falsely claims.  They must be glad they didn&#8217;t go with the &#8216;nuclear option&#8217; (that was never really an option&#8211;it was an idle threat).<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3930056', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilco</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/12/senate-conservatives-rush-to-cheneys-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-3930052</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/12/senate-conservatives-rush-to-cheneys-defense/#comment-3930052</guid>
		<description>Not to sound too trollish, but didn&#039;t the Veep admit he&#039;s in the executive?
And isn&#039;t it the President who dictates terms of his own orders?  He came out and stated the order didn&#039;t apply to Cheney&#039;s office.  I&#039;m not defending Bush, but respecting precedent.  It seems counterproductive to take this course, just more politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to sound too trollish, but didn&#8217;t the Veep admit he&#8217;s in the executive?<br />
And isn&#8217;t it the President who dictates terms of his own orders?  He came out and stated the order didn&#8217;t apply to Cheney&#8217;s office.  I&#8217;m not defending Bush, but respecting precedent.  It seems counterproductive to take this course, just more politics.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3930052', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: War4Sale</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/12/senate-conservatives-rush-to-cheneys-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-3930045</link>
		<dc:creator>War4Sale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/12/senate-conservatives-rush-to-cheneys-defense/#comment-3930045</guid>
		<description>Wait, let me give it a try:

(Ahem) Dick Cheney is a man.  A &#039;Muhricun man, m&#039;kay...

.................................Uh..............................

So, in closing...if you don&#039;t fund this &#039;Muhricun man, then you&#039;re not funding &#039;Muhricuh!  And um...well...God Bless &#039;Muhricuh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, let me give it a try:</p>
<p>(Ahem) Dick Cheney is a man.  A &#8216;Muhricun man, m&#8217;kay&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;Uh&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>So, in closing&#8230;if you don&#8217;t fund this &#8216;Muhricun man, then you&#8217;re not funding &#8216;Muhricuh!  And um&#8230;well&#8230;God Bless &#8216;Muhricuh.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3930045', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus Aurelius</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/12/senate-conservatives-rush-to-cheneys-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-3930033</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus Aurelius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/12/senate-conservatives-rush-to-cheneys-defense/#comment-3930033</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;So really, push hard, Republicans. Protect one of the least popular politicians to ever fill VP in our entire history. Tie Dick Cheney around your neck, and see what the hell happens. Think you can swim, or even float with THAT weighing you down? Good luck.

Comment by Moderation â€” July 12, 2007 @ 10:28 am&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Good one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>So really, push hard, Republicans. Protect one of the least popular politicians to ever fill VP in our entire history. Tie Dick Cheney around your neck, and see what the hell happens. Think you can swim, or even float with THAT weighing you down? Good luck.</p>
<p>Comment by Moderation â€” July 12, 2007 @ 10:28 am</p></blockquote>
<p>Good one.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3930033', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: War4Sale</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/12/senate-conservatives-rush-to-cheneys-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-3930030</link>
		<dc:creator>War4Sale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/12/senate-conservatives-rush-to-cheneys-defense/#comment-3930030</guid>
		<description>This will make for some great clips on The Daily Show!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This will make for some great clips on The Daily Show!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3930030', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: missmolly</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/12/senate-conservatives-rush-to-cheneys-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-3930021</link>
		<dc:creator>missmolly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/12/senate-conservatives-rush-to-cheneys-defense/#comment-3930021</guid>
		<description>To Bob --

Don&#039;t forget -- if it was the last administration and Al Gore was ducking a subpoena by claiming he wasn&#039;t part of the exec branch, the Repubs would be clamoring for his head.  But when Cheney does it, it&#039;s OK.

Sheesh!  And the conservative trolls accuse US of employing double standards...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Bob &#8211;</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t forget &#8212; if it was the last administration and Al Gore was ducking a subpoena by claiming he wasn&#8217;t part of the exec branch, the Repubs would be clamoring for his head.  But when Cheney does it, it&#8217;s OK.</p>
<p>Sheesh!  And the conservative trolls accuse US of employing double standards&#8230;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3930021', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
