http://www.freedomofmind.com/resourcecenter/groups/m/moonies/fraser-report/index12.html

(Wood) said that Moon, through the UC and its numerous front organizations, wanted to acquire enough influence in America to be able to “dictate policy on major issues, to influence legislation, and move into electoral politics.” In the United States, the political goals of the UC and those of the KCIA “overlap so thoroughly as to display no difference at all.”

quoting Moon:

So please take spiritual dominion in your states. You can proclaim spiritually to the government leaders, “I am the elder brother, you are the younger brother.” Teach them what you have learned. I invited many congressmen and senators to come to conferences to be educated. Though they may not proclaim openly, many of them support me. Through the Washington Times, Insight magazine, and the World and I, I have been preparing the foundation for you to influence America.

[Leaders' Conference - Sun Myung Moon
November 23, 1989]

http://www.unification.net/2000/20000122.html

In 1982, in accordance with the will of God, I founded The Washington Times here in Washington, D.C. Ever since then, this newspaper has led American public opinion as a conservative news medium showing the path that America must follow.

Comment by where left is right — July 19, 2007″

Ha, ha, ha, ha! Obama? What has the muslim done? Clinton? What has she done? Edwards? Ha, ha, ha, ha!

http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/19/murdoch-blair/

Actually, I think I’ll end as you began:

Uh, how about a REAL HONEST view.

Sean O’Neil came to the TP website.

Sean O’Neil offered that he knew a way for the Democrats in Congress to stop the war.

Sean O’Neil refused over many interactions to state specifics, referring only to his own website.

So there was NO SINGLE ASPECT of ending the war in this charade of Sean O’Neil’s.

Instead of playing Spin The Blame onto the progressives, how about offering well thought out and articulated options which are alluded to instead of stalling and deflecting?

If you’re going to “state expertise” then at least you should focus on the “state” part, even if you skip the “expertise” part.

Sheesh.

“Save me time” ROTFL! You’ve wasted a lot of my time. And if you had simply made your points here, where you came, MANY of us here could have the benefit of your wisdom and insight and you could have saved us ALL a lot of time.

I can only conclude, with my limited logical and reasoning ability, that you are trying awfully hard to direct people to your website and/or you are simply trying to derail this thread and/or you are setting up a way to bash progressives. Thus, “troll” I label thee. I KNOW I’m done.

Presumably that’s to enable further denigration by false implication.

And you maintain that I am the one employing logical fallacy. That’s rich. And I notice you haven’t pointed to any logical fallacy in my writings! Doubly rich!

Come on, Jeremy. You’re acting like an amateur. Either man up and debate like an adult, or be dismissed by those who visit these threads.

Your choice.

Not pushing my website, PLC. Not pushing it at all. Trying to save you some time. Not even sure how I could possibly do anything negative with your visit to my site. It’s on Blogger. See the URL?

You don’t want to go there, fine by me. It’s just another comment on your claim to being progressive or open.

Constructing a Strawman: Creating a false point from the opposition, in order to attack that point and not the opposition’s real point. A logical fallacy. PLC never once said that your blog was commercial, Sean. He said you were doing a hard sell, which you are doing right now. Hard Sell does not equal Commercial. Another pair of terms I’ve seen used for what you’re doing is ‘Blog Whoring’ and ‘Plugging Blog’.

Ad Hominem Attack: Attacking the poster directly instead of his argument. Another logical fallacy. Calling us Rovian operatives, ’stupid f-cks’, etc. A way not to have to actually have your point destroyed, in your mind.

Drop the logical fallacies if you want to debate. Clean up your language. Act like a mature adult, not like a petulant teenager, or a troll, and you may get more a receptive audience.

Destroy that Straw Man!

Again, why are you pushing your website. I don’t need to justify why I don’t want to go there. You came to THIS website and said you had information. So, share it, here.

Again, you insult my level of “progressive”. You’ve already insulted my level of Christianity. All that’s left is my patriotism and you’ve insulted my whole screen name.

You’re comical. You have not once directly responded to my statements, instead you have chosen EVERY TIME to paraphrase them in a lie, and then criticize or denigrate the fabricated view.

We call that “straw man” argument in logic and rhetoric. I will let you keep using it, because it simply exposes your intent and goals here, which is to be Sniper No. 2.

Sniper No. 2 is equally ineffective, only he comes from the pseudo-moralist faux-Christian perspective. Most intelligent objective readers will be insulted by him equally as much as they are by Sniper No. 1.

Good work, TP.