Cheney was angered over Rumsfeld’s ouster.
By on Jul 21st, 2007 at 3:00 pm
Cheney was angered over Rumsfeld’s ouster.
The Plank’s Isaac Chotiner finds this interesting revelation from Stephen Hayes’ Cheney biography. Hayes describes the events as Cheney’s staffers were preparing him for an appearance on Fox News Sunday:
An aide fired one tough question after another at the vice president. Then: Did you agree with President Bush’s decision to replace Donald Rumsfeld as secretary of defense?
“Absolutely not,” Cheney replied without elaborating. His answer surprised the small group with him, but it was the answer he was determined to give if Wallace asked, even at the risk of angering his boss. But the story was a month old, and Wallace never asked the question.
View Most Popular
Advertisement
What We're About
What We're Fighting For
What We're Fighting Against
Featured
Subscribe to the Progress Report
Topic CloudView topics sorted by popularity
Afghanistan
Bachmann
Beck
Boehner
Business
Civil Rights
Congress
Corporate Ethics
Dobbs
Economy
Education
Election
Energy
Environment
Ethics
Fox News
Gingrich
Global Warming
Health Care
Hoffman
Immigration
International Relations
Iraq
Justice
LGBT
Lieberman
Limbaugh
Media
Military
O'Reilly
Obama
Palin
Pelosi
Politics
Race
Radical Right
Religion
Sports
Steele
Stimulus
Tea Parties
Tea Party
Terrorism
Veterans
Women's Rights
Visit Our Affiliated Sites
Reports
In-depth studies on select topics
Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.
ArchivesBlog Roll
Illitereante Jesus Campers’ for Mitt Romney.
-GSD
July 21st, 2007 at 3:04 pmOoops! If you are going to make fun of illiterate folks it helps to spell illiterate correctly.
Boy do I feel as dumb as a Romney supporter.
-GSD
July 21st, 2007 at 3:06 pmbut, gsd, if they’d spelled it right, with that extra ‘m’,
July 21st, 2007 at 3:10 pmthen it wouldn’t have rhymed! … doncha know…
Uh, I would like to see people anger that S.O.B. on an hourly basis.
Perhaps only enormously high blood pressure can bring him down.
July 21st, 2007 at 3:19 pmIt doesn’t surprise me that Cheney would be upset over Rummy getting fired considering that Rummy was for keeping secrects from Congress and Gates seems to favor being open with Congress.
July 21st, 2007 at 3:21 pmHe should have resigned in protest!
July 21st, 2007 at 3:23 pmNot angry enough to bring on a massive coronary though.
July 21st, 2007 at 3:26 pmDid Cheney and Rumsfeld Cover Up a CIA Assassination?
“These documents show the lengths to which the government was trying to cover up the truth,” Eric Olson said, regarding memos that uncovered Cheney and Rumsfeld’s role in perpetuating the deceit. “For 22 years there was a cover-up. And then, under the guise of revealing everything, there was a new cover-up.” [Mercury News]
The London Sunday Express blared the headline: “Scientist Was Killed to Stop Him Revealing Death Secrets; So Did Cheney and Rumsfeld Cover Up a CIA Assassination?” [FrankOlsonProject.org] while the Guardian picked up where other U.S. publications did not. “This story is clearly less fun, and a lot more scary, than a CIA-LSD suicide, and it hasn’t received nearly as much coverage,” Jon Ronson wrote. “Few of the journalists who attended yesterday’s press conference are following up the evidence Olson presented. Instead they’ve written about Olson’s “healing process” and his “closure”.
Frank Olson’s legacy, for anyone willing to study it, goes beyond the Manchurian Candidate and implicates the U.S. government in crimes that surpass mind manipulation and run of the mill assassination. In fact, Olson’s case is reportedly included in the assassination curriculum of the Israeli Mossad as “a successful instance of disguising a murder as a suicide.”
Certainly, after studying Olson’s case it’s clear: What was once the province of kooky conspiracy buffs has been proven to be grounded in fact. And, in addition to questions regarding the Oct. 2001 anthrax attacks, others surface: Why did George W. Bush and members of the White House staff begin taking the antibiotic Cipro on Sept. 11, weeks before the anthrax attacks? [Washington Post]; How significant were Dr. David Kelly’s concerns that he’d be “found dead in the woods”? [BBC]; Did Dr. Don Wiley’s death have anything to do with other scientists who have died under mysterious circumstances? [Globe and Mail]; And why, as the Christian Science Monitor reports, is there a “deliberate effort to kill scientists,” intellectuals and human rights activists in occupied Iraq? [Christian Science Monitor]
http://www.buzzflash.com/farrell/04/05/far04017.html
July 21st, 2007 at 3:39 pmBut wait, unless we live in Orwellian times, wasn’t the official word that Rummy resigned, not that he was fired. I just Google’d it, and that’s what first came up. So, shouldn’t Dick have been upset because his good friend and stock options buddy left the sinking ship before the skipper or were we just all told a little something, something so as not to embarrass. Wait, that’s why W waited until after the election to accept the resignation or fire him, depending on who you ask.
July 21st, 2007 at 3:39 pmWell, of course he would be angry. Cheney and Rumsfeld go way back to the Ford Administration. They’ve been “bosom buddies” ever since (but not the funny kind, like Tom Hanks and Peter Scolari.)
July 21st, 2007 at 3:39 pmConspiracy Flashback to the Ford Administration – and look who is running the ANTHRAX coverup…
http://www.frankolsonproject.org/Articulations/Script-CodeNameArtichoke.html
July 21st, 2007 at 3:39 pmHow do we know it hasn’t been the “funny kind”? I mean, cheney’s got a gay daughter and all. Not casting aspersions, but until all the facts are in we cannot discount the possibility it runs in the family. And Cheney’s uber-machismo might just be his own little way of trying to compensate. LMAO!
July 21st, 2007 at 3:41 pmNATIONAL COMMISSION ON TERRORIST ATTACKS UPON THE UNITED STATES
Public Hearing
Friday, May 23, 2003
Hart Senate Office Building
Room 216
Washington, DC
……excerpt……..
[[the following Cheney stand down order is confused for a shoot down order]]
MR. HAMILTON: We thank you for that. I wanted to focus just a moment on the Presidential Emergency Operating Center. You were there for a good part of the day. I think you were there with the vice president. And when you had that order given, I think it was by the president, that authorized the shooting down of commercial aircraft that were suspected to be controlled by terrorists, were you there when that order was given?
MR. MINETA: No, I was not. I was made aware of it during the time that the airplane coming into the Pentagon. There was a young man who had come in and said to the vice president, “The plane is 50 miles out. The plane is 30 miles out.” And when it got down to, “The plane is 10 miles out,” the young man also said to the vice president, “Do the orders still stand?” And the vice president turned and whipped his neck around and said, “Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?” Well, at the time I didn’t know what all that meant. And –
MR. HAMILTON: The flight you’re referring to is the –
MR. MINETA: The flight that came into the Pentagon.
MR. HAMILTON: The Pentagon, yeah.
MR. MINETA: And so I was not aware that that discussion had already taken place. But in listening to the conversation between the young man and the vice president, then at the time I didn’t really recognize the significance of that.
And then later I heard of the fact that the airplanes had been scrambled from Langley to come up to DC, but those planes were still about 10 minutes away. And so then, at the time we heard about the airplane that went into Pennsylvania, then I thought, “Oh, my God, did we shoot it down?” And then we had to, with the vice president, go through the Pentagon to check that out.
MR. HAMILTON: Let me see if I understand. The plane that was headed toward the Pentagon and was some miles away, there was an order to shoot that plane down. [[notice the panel member is trying to coerce the witness to affirm this]]
MR. MINETA: Well, I don’t know that specifically, but I do know that the airplanes were scrambled from Langley or from Norfolk, the Norfolk area. But I did not know about the orders specifically other than listening to that other conversation.
MR. HAMILTON: But there very clearly was an order to shoot commercial aircraft down. [[notice the panel is forcing a perspective that doesn't exist]]
MR. MINETA: Subsequently I found that out.
MR. HAMILTON: With respect to Flight 93, what type of information were you and the vice president receiving about that flight?
MR. MINETA: The only information we had at that point was when it crashed.
MR. HAMILTON: I see. You didn’t know beforehand about that airplane.
MR. MINETA: I did not.
MR. HAMILTON: And so there was no specific order there to shoot that plane down.
MR. MINETA: No, sir.
MR. HAMILTON: But there were military planes in the air in position to shoot down commercial aircraft.
MR. MINETA: That’s right. The planes had been scrambled, I believe, from Otis at that point.
MR. HAMILTON: Could you help me understand a little the division of responsibility between the FAA and NORAD on that morning?
MR. MINETA: Well, FAA is in touch with NORAD. And when the first flight from Boston had gone out of communications with the air traffic controllers, the air traffic controller then notified, I believe, Otis Air Force Base about the air traffic controller not being able to raise that American Airlines flight.
references…
http://newsmine.org/archive/9-11/norad-faa-response/cheney-stand-do
http://www.9-11commission.gov/archive/hearing2/9-11Commission_Heari
July 21st, 2007 at 3:50 pmCheney on Meet The Press:
Videotape, March 16, 2003):
MR. RUSSERT: And even though the International Atomic Energy Agency said he does not have a nuclear program, we disagree.
VICE PRES. CHENEY: I disagree, yes. And you’ll find the CIA, for example, and other key parts of our intelligence community, disagree.
And we believe he has, in fact, reconstituted nuclear weapons. I think Mr. ElBaradei, frankly, is wrong. And I think if you look at the track record of the International Atomic Energy Agency and this kind of issue, especially where Iraq is concerned, they have consistently underestimated or missed what it was Saddam Hussein was doing. I don’t have any reason to believe they’re any more valid this time than they’ve been in the past.
Regarding Cheney’s frequent trips to the CIA, Russert asks if he applied pressure to achieve a desired intelligence work product:
MR. RUSSERT: No pressure?
VICE PRES. CHENEY: Shouldn’t be any pressure. I can’t think of a single instance. Maybe somebody can produce one. I’m unaware of any where the community changed a judgment that they made because I asked questions.
MR. RUSSERT: If they were wrong, Mr. Vice President, shouldn’t we have a wholesale investigation into the intelligence failure that they predicted…
VICE PRES. CHENEY: What failure?
MR. RUSSERT: That Saddam had biological, chemical and is developing a nuclear program.
VICE PRES. CHENEY: My guess is in the end, they’ll be proven right, Tim.
So I say I’m not willing at all at this point to buy the proposition that somehow Saddam Hussein was innocent and he had no WMD and some guy out at the CIA, because I called him, cooked up a report saying he did.
That’s crazy. That makes no sense. It bears no resemblance to reality whatsoever.
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/3080244/
July 21st, 2007 at 3:52 pm“…even at the risk of angering his boss.”
Risk? Pshaw. Lucifer wouldn’t give a shit.
July 21st, 2007 at 3:58 pmWas it Cheney who ordered Chertoff to kill the Ptech Investigation??? And Remember “Operation Greenquest?†That investigation was killed too!
http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2005/01/michael-chertoff-and-sabotage-of-ptech.html
A tipster was Indira Singh, who has said she recognizes the separate command and control communications system Mike Ruppert describes Dick Cheney to have been running on September 11th as having “the exact same functionality I was looking for (Ptech).”
The Ptech case turned into an ugly dispute last year when company whistleblowers told Greenquest agents about their own suspicions about the firm’s owners. Sources close to the case say those same whistleblowers had first approached FBI agents, but the bureau apparently did little or nothing in response. With backing from the National Security Council, Greenquest agents then mounted a full-scale investigation that culminated in a raid on the company’s office last December. After getting wind of the Greenquest probe, the FBI stepped in and unsuccessfully tried to take control of the case.
Whatever the truth, there is no dispute that the case has so far produced no charges and indictments against Al-Qadi or anyone else connected with Ptech.
What role did Dick Cheney play in killing the investigation into Al-Qadi?
Now, how does Chertoff figure in the Ptech story? It goes back to the turf war of two years ago over Operation Greenquest, “the high-profile federal task force set up to target the financiers of Al Qaeda and other international terrorist groups.”
*
Clearly ptech represent some nexus between the government and terrorism that must not be revealed, and Chertoff is just the man to cover it up.
And now they’ve ensured Lieberman’s re-election and installed him in position to protect Chertoff.
Got RICO?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racketeer_Influenced_and_Corrupt_Organizations_Act
July 21st, 2007 at 4:04 pmI’m sure Cheney wasn’t happy with having one of his PNAC gang members put on the sidelines.
July 21st, 2007 at 4:06 pmUS Troops in Iraq = Fish
“Green Zone” = Barrel
Arrest Dick Cheney right now to prevent the slaughter of the US Military.
Cheney is busily preparing the next False Flag Attack against the United States (using Jumbo Jets as missiles, flown into nuclear reactor containment vessels at power plants in 3 different US cities) and has ALREADY TOLD US that when the next attack come on US soil, he will bomb IRAN, with or without proof of their involvement.
On July 20th, the US Government propaganda for this pending attack on Iran began in earnest, when Pentagon spokespersons planted stories in the US media that claimed Hezbollah Sleeper Cells were active in the United States, and may be planning attacks against the US Homeland in retaliation for the US backing of Israel.
The Bin Laden Bogeyman has served his purpose and a new one is being invented before your eyes. The term “Hizbollah Sleeper Cells” has just replaced all prior fear mongering labels used by your own government, to instill fear in you, and condition you to respond reflexively to support the bombing of Iran when Cheney launches the next Terror Attack by the Government of America, AGAINST AMERICA.
The Iran War Plan:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO505A.html
Save the lives of the US Troops in Iraq.
ARREST DICK CHENEY
July 21st, 2007 at 4:08 pm“U.S. Sen. Bill Nelson said the Bush administration last year told him and 75 other senators that Iraq not only had weapons of mass destruction, but they had the means to deliver them to East Coast cities.” The White House directed questions about the matter to the Department of Defense (who had no comment), despite the fact that the President himself had made a similar claim in a speech on 10/7/02. Nelson said the senators were told Iraq had both biological and chemical weapons, notably anthrax, and it could deliver them to cities along the Eastern seaboard via unmanned aerial vehicles, commonly known as drones.
Cheney himself told Meet the Press, “We know that [Saddam] has a long-standing relationship with the al-Qaeda organization.”
Cheney, who in the rush to war six days before invasion, told Meet the Press without proof that “Iraq has, in fact, reconstituted nuclear weapons.”
When confronted with a report from the International Atomic Energy Agency that directly contradicted him, he said simply “[IAEA Director] Elbaradei is, frankly, wrong.” (Cheney was since forced to correct his statements).
http://www.americanprogress.org/site/pp.asp?c=biJRJ8OVF&b=38330
July 21st, 2007 at 4:10 pmWow, it’s pretty spooky around here now. I left for four hours and came back to find all the trolls gone. Have they been captured by space aliens? Did they all go out to lunch together? I don’t want to jinx anything, but it’s pretty nice now.
BTW, I got a reply e-mail from the TP staff saying they are working really heard on a registration system. Hooray for them!
July 21st, 2007 at 4:29 pmbilbo, the site feels good without the trolls.
But I’m afraid they’re “There and Back Again”. I’m off unpacking Harry Potter.
July 21st, 2007 at 4:44 pmmy 2nd favourite, after LOTR.
July 21st, 2007 at 4:46 pmStephen Hayes is in his most appropriate role…as DICK cheney’s stenographer.
July 21st, 2007 at 4:57 pmComment by bilbobaggins — July 21, 2007 @ 4:29 pm
Well, michael was still plaguing poor TRoS on the “we will help you” thread a little while ago, but otherwise, it’s been a pretty good day here. I’m in and out watching the Mets game, and working on some more pictures on our blog (and Wayne’s helping me with that.) Good to hear that TP responded to you.
See you in a little while, I hope! :)
July 21st, 2007 at 4:59 pmJoined at the hip during Nixon days…Rummy was Cheney’s mentor
Aww Poor Cheney he lost his playmate!!!
Not!!!!!!!!!
As a result of that crossing of Cheney, the Libby pardon.
Figures…
July 21st, 2007 at 6:39 pmAce, you’re such a buzz kill. No one wants to read your book here on line.
Why not just call him Hitler like everybody else and let it go at that.
July 21st, 2007 at 7:02 pmBy the way, I just heard on NPR that Cheney and Rummy are neighbors. You’d stick up for your BBQ buddy wouldn’t you?
July 21st, 2007 at 7:04 pm#
Ace, you’re such a buzz kill. No one wants to read your book here on line.
Why not just call him Hitler like everybody else and let it go at that.
Comment by r — July 21, 2007 @ 7:02 pm
Because impeachment requires evidence tied to means, motive and opportunity – and the narrative connects all the dots.
July 21st, 2007 at 7:13 pm“and the narrative connects all the dots.”
If you say so, I can’t refute this short statement because you know what? I, and nobody else read the rest of your rant. It’s too boring. TP isn’t the forum for actually doing stuff like proving impeachable offences. It’s just about calling the other guy names.
That’s why there’s so few posts. Who wants to plow through all that text?
July 21st, 2007 at 7:25 pmWho wants to plow through all that text?
Comment by r — July 21, 2007 @ 7:25 pm
Hopefully all of the Democrats in Congress who will be initiating the Impeachment Process – which is a fact-finding mission.
Just because you don’t want to know the whole truth doesn’t mean that others don’t. There was virtually no conversation on that thread, and I didn’t prevent anyone from posting.
When the trolls get a day off, there’s nobody here.
July 21st, 2007 at 7:37 pmKeep up the good work as long as they’ll let you, ace.
r’s an acerebralist.
There, r, does that make it look like an “on topic” post?
July 21st, 2007 at 7:39 pmI read it, Ace.
July 21st, 2007 at 7:40 pmBrief OT,
Hi, SKdeA. Have you seen “Georgie (A Rock Opera Parody)” yet? It’s been getting rave reviews in the room I’m sitting in right now. ;)
July 21st, 2007 at 7:50 pmSo ace, nobody even commented on your first 6 or 8 very lengthy posts (with links no less – which is actually a good thing normally).
Then I took a gentile shot at you and said it’s too much, and I get posts – people actually read what I put down. Oh, but then there was one single person in the world who claimed to have red your stuff. Well, your time was well spent then.
July 21st, 2007 at 8:05 pmAnd now the post is dead, but I was looking back over other posts of the day today… Man ace – you basically filibustered TP.
You got on a bunch of rants and just killed debate. I never thought of that.
Genius!
July 21st, 2007 at 8:37 pmnever thought of that.
Genius!
Comment by r
Do you only come her to mock people? Got nothing else going on in your life?
July 21st, 2007 at 9:13 pmObviously I read ace’s posts or I wouldn’t have said that he should keep it up. That makes at least two of us.
July 21st, 2007 at 9:19 pmI trust there are at least three times more lurkers than posters in these threads. My stuff is getting read by those who care the most. That’s all that counts.
July 21st, 2007 at 9:26 pmDid you agree with President Bush’s decision to replace Donald Rumsfeld as secretary of defense?
“Absolutely not,†Cheney replied without elaborating
This proves that Bush is not just Cheney’s hand-puppet!!!
July 21st, 2007 at 9:31 pmAnd now the post is dead, but I was looking back over other posts of the day today… Man ace – you basically filibustered TP. – r
I know!!!!
That’s his MO, copy and paste from other blogs and full articles, regardless of whether or not it has to do with the topic of the thread!!!!
(a)
(c)
(e)
!!!
!!!
!!!
!!!
!!!
n.e.o.CONs.p.i.r.a.c.y.
July 21st, 2007 at 9:33 pmAce, maybe you’re right about lurkers vs. posters, but it might count more if people more prestigious than us heard your stuff. If it’s really worth hearing.
I know the phone numbers and mailing addresses to all the folks who can actually do things is available, and I suspect you’ve sent the e-mails, made the calls, etc. But if Nancy and Harry don’t care about your crusade, why should we?
July 21st, 2007 at 9:34 pmLong Live the Z*onist-Crusader Alliance!!!
July 21st, 2007 at 9:37 pmNo stopping until every last infidel is expelled from the Holy Land!!!
So Mr. TRoS,
You asked if I only come her to mock people? Got nothing else going on in your life?
Am I worse than Mr Kalashnikov?
July 21st, 2007 at 9:41 pmBut if Nancy and Harry don’t care about your crusade, why should we?
Comment by r — July 21, 2007 @ 9:34 pm
Since we know you oppose everything Nancy and Harry care about, by your reasoning, you should be very concerned with the content of ace’s posts.
Or do you believe in the same things Nancy and Harry care about? Which one is it?
July 21st, 2007 at 9:41 pmSometimes you must get the most visible loser off the stage so the other losers may continue.
July 21st, 2007 at 9:50 pmIt is easier to redirect attention when the focus is not pin pointed.
Ask roveroo
Semi conscious vp man is in it for the money not populatity.
The others have to keep their jobs.vp man heads big h and is set-up.
Business as usual.
Besides former def sec is a good friend and cohort.
In perusing (lurking) tonight’s posts, there is one glaring fact: Somebody is extremely frightened by the information which Ace posts here on these threads. All I can say is that there are many of us here who greatly appreciate the information which he is bringing to the mainstream consciousness. I could care less what technique Ace uses – naturally, cut and post is the most expeditious of techniques for the purpose.
I don’t know about anyone else but I’d much prefer a ream of Ace’s truth and information than any of the ridiculous nonsensical drivel which is an ongoing diatribe by the inane, irrelevant trolls who litter these threads.
At least what Ace posts is intelligent, articulate, relevant and highly important in order for us to get to the Truth about what’s occurring in this country on the Neocon Cabal’s watch.
Thank you again, Ace and keep filling these threads with important data and truthful information. At least he has places from which he cuts and posts as well as legitimate links he furnishes – unlike any troll who has ever posted here – nonsense and without any credible links to support their hypotheses.
July 21st, 2007 at 10:12 pm“you should be very concerned with the content of ace’s posts.”
Or do you believe in the same things Nancy and Harry care about? Which one is it?
Comment by Wayne A. Schneider — July 21, 2007 @ 9:41 pm
I think I admitted I didn’t care to wade through his 10 miles of BS in hopes of finding a gem that hadn’t been previously discovered.
“THEY” know everything he knows, so all he’s doing is filibustering this thread. Nothing will come of it.
Yak.
My real complaint was about long posts draining the life out of a thread. Which it almost did, until I chimed in :).
July 21st, 2007 at 10:13 pmComment by veritas — July 21, 2007 @ 10:12 pm
As they like to say in Congress, “I’d like to associate myself with veritas’ remarks.”
I agree wholeheartedly. Someone doesn’t want these pesky questions answered. They would rather we accept the government’s “Official Conspiracy Theory” without question than point out the flaws in it. Well, that ain’t gonna happen.
As Pete Townshend wrote,
“We’re not gonna take it!
July 21st, 2007 at 10:18 pmI know it’s late and this probably won’t get answered, but how long would a troll last here if he cut and pasted long rants from his “sources”.
First of all, are “aces†postings attributed. Those posted with links seem to be. But who would want to read a blog of 10,000 word essays cut and pasted from opposing views.
If you say it’s ok, I’ll be back on every thread. Is this really what you want?
July 21st, 2007 at 10:49 pmComment by r — July 21, 2007 @ 10:49 pm
The truth is, some nut-cases, like veritas, actually encourage a.c.e.
However, most normal TPers find it annoying. They won’t admit this of course, because they would rather gang up on you, a “troll.”
If you want to filibuster a thread, which I have been known to do, I suggest finding some articles by Ann Coulter and plastering them up on the comment board!!!
It’ll be great!
July 21st, 2007 at 11:05 pmread THE RISE OF THE VULCANS about rumsfeld and cheney disappearing most weekends in the 80s to go to mt weather in virginia that is where the shadow government is located.
rumsfeld is still working in the pentagon
July 22nd, 2007 at 12:56 am“We’re not gonna take it!
Comment by Wayne A. Schneider — July 21, 2007 @ 10:18 pm
No, we ain’t gonna take it!
ACE – I found your posts very informative, even though some of them contained information I was already aware of, I like seeing how others “connect the dots.”
However, most normal TPers find it annoying. They won’t admit this of course, because they would rather gang up on you, a “troll.â€
Comment by Kalashnikov — July 21, 2007 @ 11:05 pm
Heh, heh. Mr. P thinks he’s normal! heh, heh…
BNK
July 22nd, 2007 at 4:38 amR.
As to the matter of attribution, I provide links to the sources cited. When no attribution is cited, I wrote it. Up to half of the stuff you’ll see me post is written by me.
Wouldn’t you think that if any of the information I ever post was inaccurate, somebody would be in these threads with contrary FACTS and LINKS to prove me wrong?
When I claim that Bin Laden DOES NOT EXIST, it should be possible for someone to prove me wrong. It’s easier to prove a positive than a negative, right?
So prove me wrong – and if you can’t prove that Bin Laden is on the sunny side of the grass, then stop assuming that everything else this administration tells you is true. You do a great disservice to your country when you spread falsehoods.
Start here:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/july2007/180707oldfootage.htm
http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/topten/fugitives/laden.htm
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/osamatape.html
http://www.physics911.net/kevinbarrett.htm
http://www.911blimp.net/vid_fakeOsamaVideo.shtml
Where’s Waldo?
As for Kalashnikiov – everyone knows it’s the same troll as Mr. P – and he’s irrelevant.
July 22nd, 2007 at 5:44 amAce, you’re doing a fine job. Occasionally I think your posts veer into conspiracyland, but it’s always helpful to check the links. More often than not, I am convinced you’re right.
Anybody who hasn’t got the attention span to read it, just scroll along. I scroll whenever I don’t have much time to read. But quite often I return later to read the entire post.
r, does your nickname represent your attention span?
July 22nd, 2007 at 8:11 amDoro:
“Conspiracyland” is the only place you need to look for the truth.
This is the biggest conspiracy ever conceived in the history of planet earth.
July 22nd, 2007 at 9:03 amWhile it is not surprising that Cheney was angered by the Rumsfeld firing, especially since that was also seen as a criticism of his contribution to the war (who do you think suggested Rumsfeld for the job?), I was actually very relieved to see that they even try to prep for interviews by Fox and that they don’t get the questions beforehand. Gives me some hope to be a little less cynical. Some hope…
July 22nd, 2007 at 9:13 am