Think Progress

Soltz: Bush Needs To Resolve Whether Pat Tillman Was Killed For His Political Views

Yesterday, Iraq war veteran Jon Soltz wrote on ThinkProgress about Pat Tillman: “Was the man the White House used to promote the war ordered to be killed because he was becoming increasingly critical of the war in Iraq?”

Last night on MSNBC’s Countdown, host Keith Olbermann noted that “Corporal Tillman held a number of personal views that were unpopular within the context of the Bush administration, perhaps also within the Army.” Tillman reportedly favored John Kerry in the presidential election, opposed the invasion of Iraq, and had plans to meet with Noam Chomsky.

The Associated Press reported that in the last moments before Tillman died, another soldier was hugging the ground at Tillman’s side, and Tillman said, “Would you shut your [expletive] mouth? God’s not going to help you; you need to do something for yourself, you sniveling –”

The question of whether Tillman was killed for his political views lingers greater than ever. Appearing on MSNBC’s Countdown, Soltz said:

We know he was a free thinker. But it leads you to think was this guy killed possibly by people that didn’t like his political views or was he killed accidentally? We had a time in the war when the Abu Ghraib scandal broke in April 2004 in Iraq; we had basically the Iraqi Tet offensive where the Shiite militias rose up and the contractors were burned at the stake; the President was facing the election and he decided not to go into Fallujah for six months. Did they use him to justify, politically, bad policy in Iraq?

Watch it:

The confluence of these factors intensify the need for openness. Despite being warned that Tillman may have died by friendly fire, Bush referenced Tillman in a 2004 speech but made no reference to how he died. The White house has cited executive privilege in refusing to turn over records that would verify how much Bush knew.

Soltz wrote on ThinkProgress that the longer this case lingers, the more damaging it will be to the military: “Those already in the military will lose faith that the leadership actually gives a damn about them, as the Tillman case becomes a hot topic in chow halls. Morale and confidence in the institution will crumble.”

UPDATE: Some commenters incorrectly understand Soltz’s argument to be that the White House had some involvement in or prior knowledge about the death. That is not what is being alleged. Rather, the question is whether Tillman’s political views played any role in motivating the person who shot him. And did the administration subsequently cover up the motive for Tillman’s death?



273 Responses to “Soltz: Bush Needs To Resolve Whether Pat Tillman Was Killed For His Political Views”

  1. Kevin says:

    I think were drifting over the cliff a bit with this one. calling for openness, yes. turning this into a political conspiracy, that amid the confusion and friendly fire there was a political fragging going on, with no evidence to that, is merely sensationalist speculation that should be beneath this blog.


  2. jwrjr says:

    The white house ordering the death of a public figure who disagrees with them?? Oh, come on now. That is as likely as dick cheney shooting some lawyer in the face!


  3. ToxicEd says:

    I put NOTHING past this administration. They are hateful, vengeful people and I could see them killing Pat to both silence him and use his death for political gain. This administration will gladly let people die (Katrina and Iraq) and rob them (gasoline prices) to get what they want.


  4. eno_on says:

    What will it take to get beyond questions and speculation to evidence?


  5. Marcus Aruelius says:

    We need to keep beating this drum.


  6. Marcus Aruelius says:

    I think were drifting over the cliff a bit with this one. calling for openness, yes. turning this into a political conspiracy, that amid the confusion and friendly fire there was a political fragging going on, with no evidence to that, is merely sensationalist speculation that should be beneath this blog.

    Comment by Kevin — July 28, 2007 @ 2:07 pm

    So, why the cover up! Why the claim of Executive Privilege?

    they’re the ones blowing smoke – we’re just looking for the fire.


  7. veritas says:

    One more “executive privilege” claim by Bush which trumps common decency! How low can this guy go? GeorgeBush absolutely “owes” the Tillman Family as well as all americans a speedy explanation on how this occurred, (why it occurred?), and how it was intentionally covered up. This level of foul play is really getting old. It’s no wonder most americans throw up at the mere thought of Bush these days.

    This new scandal is sure to tank his numbers into the teens! Sick, sick, sick stuff he’s connected to but what can one reasonably expect when his grandfather was connected to the Nazis and was ordered to cease and desist under the Trading with the Enemy Act???


  8. Epictetus says:

    I think Noam Chomsky was in on the conspiracy!


  9. Perry Logan says:

    “I put NOTHING past this administration.”

    Not quite, in my view. The people in this administration are cowards. They will do only what their cowardice permits.


  10. veritas says:

    Executive Privilege simply indicts Bush by his mere use of the term. Besides, I believe constitutional experts and constitutional lawyers are gearing up to challenge him on the legitimacy of it’s use. Nowhere in the Constititution does it state that a President can utilize “executive privilege” to cover up his criminal activities.


  11. Bobwurst says:

    Toxic Ed is right. The fact that bush is hiding behind executive privieledge means he’s got something to hide. Bush has long past the point where he gets the benefit of the doubt: every position he has taken on an issue has turned out to be a cover for a far worse set of circumstances and until we know what happened to Mr. Tillman, It’s only sensible that the worst be on the table.


  12. Ernesto says:

    are you FREAKIN SERIOUS!?!!?!!?!?!?!?!?

    killed for political reasons???? wooow you guys need to lay off the tinfoil hat stuff. looooonatics.


  13. veritas says:

    I’ve sent Kevin Tillman’s letter to every editor I know this past week. It really bears reading and printing at this point in time.

    http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/200601019_after_pats_birthday/


  14. Marcus Aruelius says:

    are you FREAKIN SERIOUS!?!!?!!?!?!?!?!?

    killed for political reasons???? wooow you guys need to lay off the tinfoil hat stuff. looooonatics.

    Comment by Ernesto — July 28, 2007 @ 2:13 pm

    Hey, Ernie,

    Answer this: Why the claim of Executive Privilege? Why a cover up?


  15. veritas says:

    Ernesto: It’s clear that you’ve been eating out of your aluminum pans for too long, dude. I think your dx would be senile dementia.


  16. TheOtherWA says:

    When Tillman yelled “I’m Pat f***ing Tillman!” did he remove his helmet? Because I keep looking at pictures of Army Rangers and soldiers and their helmets cover their foreheads. You can’t even see their eyebrows. How the hell does someone get shot 3 times in the forehead wearing that kind of helmet?

    Or, could the bullets go thru the helmet? All helmets protect the head, but they aren’t perfect.

    The more I read about Tillman’s death, the more questions I have.


  17. veritas says:

    P.S. Just for the record, Ernesto is Michael who is also CT Scan.


  18. veritas says:

    Ernesto is also Mr. Pee – this we definitely can see from his misuse of punctuation.


  19. Martha Stewart says:

    Why the claim of Executive Privilege? Why a cover up?

    Comment by Marcus Aruelius — July 28, 2007 @ 2:15 pm

    It may just be a reflex reaction.


  20. veritas says:

    I think Kevin Tillman knows exactly what Bush is trying to hide with his use of executive privilege. If we were to peek behind this little man’s use of this probably illegal tactic called executive privilege, we might see much, much more. Let’s get digging.


  21. 'nonomous says:

    Openness = OK
    This = Crazy Conspiracy Theory

    Why did this get published?


  22. GSD says:

    I will use the same logic the advocates of Bush’s myriad domestic spy programs use: “If they have nothing to hide, why are they hiding?”

    -GSD


  23. Martha Stewart says:

    Why the claim of Executive Privilege? Why a cover up?

    Comment by Marcus Aruelius — July 28, 2007 @ 2:15 pm

    *crickets*


  24. veritas says:

    Those three bullet holes in the middle of his forehead at about 10 yards distance, per the coroner, just can’t be legitimately explained away.


  25. Epictetus says:

    Why the claim of Executive Privilege? Why a cover up?

    Comment by Marcus Aruelius — July 28, 2007 @ 2:15 pm

    *crickets*

    Comment by Martha Stewart — July 28, 2007 @ 2:17 pm
    ——————————-

    They are protecting Chomsky!!!


  26. Marcus Aruelius says:

    Why the claim of Executive Privilege? Why a cover up?

    Comment by Marcus Aruelius — July 28, 2007 @ 2:15 pm

    *crickets*

    Comment by Martha Stewart — July 28, 2007 @ 2:17 pm

    Maybe a reflex action. Maybe they can’t go there. The question stands until answered.


  27. The Republic of Stupidity says:

    Comments like “ernesto’s” are irrelevant at this point. This ugly situation will go to where it goes. The WH, Rush Limbaugh, the “librul” MSM and our own dear concern trolls couldn’t possibly derail this train at this point.

    Last stop, Pennsylvania Avenue!

    BTW, my money for ernesto’s identity goes on Flaco.

    Later, folks.


  28. Marcus Aruelius says:

    They are protecting Chomsky!!!

    Comment by Epictetus — July 28, 2007 @ 2:19 pm

    Bush’s claim of Executive Privilege is to protect Noam Chomsky! Ha!


  29. veritas says:

    What a diabolical cover to do something this reprehensible and then turn him into a national hero? I’m not surprised that his parents are going for Bush’s jugular on this one. This is the epitome of serious psychiatric illness – if this was a “hit” due to Tillman’s increasing disillusionment with the occupation, and then to try to hide your tracks which was so obviously done….and then to add insult to injury by pimping his parents into believing that he was a hero…..a precisely the time people were questioning Bush’s faux WMD theory….well, lookie here, folks….I do believe we have a bona fide thriller on our hands. And the end of this sad, twisted clue game will, no doubt, be found somewhere on a ranch in Crawford.


  30. veritas says:

    Marcus: That moronic troll doesn’t know who Chomsky actually is…I don’t know where they get these trolls on the weekend – out of some gutter, no doubt and in need of some quick cash under the table for their next drug fix.


  31. veritas says:

    Republic: I think you’re onto it – Flacky ’tis.


  32. doro says:

    So, why the cover up! Why the claim of Executive Privilege?

    they’re the ones blowing smoke – we’re just looking for the fire.

    Comment by Marcus Aruelius — July 28, 2007 @ 2:10 pm

    That’s what I am asking myself all along. I’ve settled for the explanation, that an incident like this is very embarrassing for the military and of course for the President, who owns these wars. They tried to spin Pat Tillman as the universal hero after his death. And when the partial truth came out, they were left with their knickers around their socks. So they spun it as a friendly fire incident, and period. To avoid the full embarrassing truth from coming out, they claimed executive privilege to keep the lid on things and – thus – made it even worse.

    No, I don’t think this was a conspiracy to kill Pat Tillman for his political views. This is just another sad example of the colossal ineptitude of this administration. The only thing that would help now is to get the full truth out, but they are far too incompetent to see this and act accordingly.

    This administration, seen from the outside here in Europe, is criminally inept and therefore a danger to world peace. As this massive incompetence has led to several breaches of the law and the constitution, I do not understand why impeachment is not under way right now. Is Congress as incompetent?


  33. veritas says:

    I’m outta here too…nothing of substance to discuss except for troll blather until this investigation moves forward and forward it will move – stopping right on Penna. Aveue like Republic said.


  34. Marcus Aruelius says:

    Comment by veritas — July 28, 2007 @ 2:22 pm

    I’m beginning to wonder if there’s a bottom to their barrel.


  35. Grand Moff Texan says:

    The White house has cited executive privilege in refusing to turn over records that would verify how much Bush knew.

    That’s just plain weird. What could they possibly have to hide? Up to this point, I just figured the shooting was accidental or the result of personal animosities. But now the White House has blown the story up to these proportions.

    Why would they do that if they didn’t have to?
    .


  36. CT Scan says:

    =======>CONSPIRACY


  37. veritas says:

    Doro: You need to do some reading. This is not a case of “ineptitude” unless you classify “intentional ineptitude or illusional ineptitude” in the same category. This is precisely what Bush would love everyone to believe. Unfortunately, when one researches things a bit, it’s more like a page out of the Third Reich.

    This has nothing to do with ineptitude. It’s all been a calculated, progressive coup on this democracy with 911 as it’s catalyst.


  38. veritas says:

    Doro: Many of us at one time actually believed them to be inept as well. Now we know that it’s all been a well-contrived plan.


  39. veritas says:

    #35 It’s called “murder”.


  40. Marcus Aruelius says:

    That’s what I am asking myself all along. I’ve settled for the explanation, that an incident like this is very embarrassing for the military and of course for the President, who owns these wars. They tried to spin Pat Tillman as the universal hero after his death. And when the partial truth came out, they were left with their knickers around their socks. So they spun it as a friendly fire incident, and period. To avoid the full embarrassing truth from coming out, they claimed executive privilege to keep the lid on things and – thus – made it even worse.

    No, I don’t think this was a conspiracy to kill Pat Tillman for his political views. This is just another sad example of the colossal ineptitude of this administration. The only thing that would help now is to get the full truth out, but they are far too incompetent to see this and act accordingly.

    This administration, seen from the outside here in Europe, is criminally inept and therefore a danger to world peace. As this massive incompetence has led to several breaches of the law and the constitution, I do not understand why impeachment is not under way right now. Is Congress as incompetent?

    Comment by doro — July 28, 2007 @ 2:23 pm

    Actually, I agree with your post. However – one must assume the worst and most nefarious motives when confronted with intractable stonewalling. Make them admit how rankly and disrespectfully they used Mr. Tillman and his family, and for what political purpose. Otherwise, I say it’s the politically motivated murder of a legitimate American hero and patriot.


  41. The Republic of Stupidity says:

    This = Crazy Conspiracy Theory

    Why did this get published?

    Comment by ‘nonomous — July 28, 2007

    What’s a crazy conspiracy theory?


  42. Martha Stewart says:

    Marcos, fix your name.

    We have company coming over.


  43. WaltTheMan says:

    The key issue here is that W used Pat Tillman’s death to political advantage when he knew allready that the conditions under which he died were suspicious. This is lower then a whale turd at the bottom of the Marianas Trench.


  44. ace says:

    I think were drifting over the cliff a bit with this one. calling for openness, yes. turning this into a political conspiracy, that amid the confusion and friendly fire there was a political fragging going on, with no evidence to that, is merely sensationalist speculation that should be beneath this blog.

    Comment by Kevin — July 28, 2007 @ 2:07 pm

    Kevin:

    If you don’t have top-of-mind that the Bush administration is lying about virtually everything, you’re simply not paying attention. If you don’t believe that there was a conspiracy to cover-up the circumstances of his death – and the subsequent invention of a cover-story designed to benefit the White House politically, you’ll be hard-pressed to explain their claim of executive privilege.

    If you don’t see the carefully crafted conspiracy that led to the commencement of this war under false pretense, and all that has followed – you are in no position to proclaim what ought to be discussed by those seeking the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

    No Evidence? Are you insane? Of course there’s evidence, but only the White House can see it…because it was they who invented it.

    You have NO EVIDENCE that there was either confusion OR friendly fire. Could this not have been deliberate, premeditated murder? Who are you to say?

    You further have NO EVIDENCE that Bin Laden even exists – yet you’ll be the first to parrot that he does.

    EVIDENCE?

    EVIDENCE is what we seek. In the absence of it, there is no degree of speculation, regardless of how conspiratorial, that this administration has not EARNED. When your actions lead to the total absence of credibility for every word spoken by Bush, this is the logical result.

    How dare you tell others what is not to speculate. There is apparently no degree of evil that is beyond them.

    Remember, they said that the air at Ground Zero was safe to breath?

    You are disqualified from this conversation.


  45. ace says:

    This = Crazy Conspiracy Theory

    Why did this get published?

    Comment by ‘nonomous — July 28, 2007

    That Bin Laden is alive and well is a Crazy Conspiracy Theory,

    Do you endorse that Presidential whopper?


  46. dbadass says:

    It’s such a man’s world, Jessica Lynch gets no attention even though her situation was made up also. Regrets to the Tillmans and all the rest of the families of the lost and maimed


  47. ToxicEd says:

    Maybe the WH didn’t order his death, but they sure used it to their political advantage. This administration lied to start a war in Iraq and that has lead to a whole clusterf*ck in the middle east and the death of hundreds of thousands of people. Only a freeking moron would suppose a war isn’t going to get a lot of people killed. Therefore I put nothing past them.

    Could you imagine the political ramifications to the WH of Pat Tillman, a respected vet who was in the war (unlike everybody in the WH), stating publicly in the US (and thus on every TV channel) that the war in Iraq is wrong and to vote against Bush? The people in the WH would do ANYTHING to silence that type of powerful anti-WH message.

    Executive privilege is another lie, just like WMD in Iraq, nukular programs in Iraq, Saddam did 9-11, the WH has nothing to do with the US Attorney firings, and on. The WH knows it is going to be really embarrassed by the truth (reference Jessica Lynch) and want to prevent that from happening. People in the US pay far more attention to football than politics and the WH lying about killing a respected football player is going to go down really badly.


  48. Spudge_Boy says:

    The right wing fascist will stop at nothing to destroy this country. They do it by removing the real great leaders:

    Martin Luther King

    John F Kennedy

    Robert Kennedy

    Anthrax sent to Democratic leaders to sway their votes to go to war.

    Pat TIllman martyred

    NeoCons = Nazis

    Anybody supporting Bush at this point is a NeoCon.

    Therefore Bush supports are NeoCons, which means they are Nazis.

    We shouldn;t have let any of the Nazis escape. They weren’t just following orders. They want to rule the world. A New World Order was coined by a man who’s father funded the Nazis. His son is continuing the tradition.


  49. Epictetus says:

    ace!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


  50. Marcus Aruelius says:

    Comment by ace — July 28, 2007 @ 2:32 pm

    Hey, ace, go easy on him – he seems to not get the nuance of the topic.


  51. tarazan says:

    Of course,the only way to know the truth is when W. House staff agree to testify after receiving Congressional subpoenas.

    But they elected instead to use ‘Executive Privilege’.


  52. Martha Stewart says:

    Why the claim of Executive Privilege? Why a cover up?

    Comment by Marcus Aruelius — July 28, 2007 @ 2:15 pm

    Just a coincidence?


  53. Jim says:

    This is rediculous, not helpful at all to the diologue about the wars and will inevitably be used by the right to radicalize us.


  54. robbez_92107 says:

    Comment by veritas — July 28, 2007 @ 2:18 pm

    Three American bullets in Pat Tillman’s forehead. His uniform and personal belongings burned in the field. It really IS as easy as that to understand. Do NOT let trolls mock the sacrifice of this American soldier – focus on the facts.


  55. Marcus Aruelius says:

    Why the claim of Executive Privilege? Why a cover up?

    Comment by Marcus Aruelius — July 28, 2007 @ 2:15 pm

    Just a coincidence?

    Must be.


  56. Tobey Tall says:

    remember 66% of the troops want out of Iraq

    The massage to the remaining troops is simple – do your job or be shot by your own

    The White house has cited executive privilege in refusing to turn over records that would verify how much Bush knew.

    I small a rat or a piece of dogshit , whichever way you view Bush

    IF YOU REALLY WANT TO KNOW WHAT HAS BEEN ACCOMPLICED IN AFGHANISTAN READ THIS BY CRAIG MURRAY

    http://www.craigmurray.co.uk/


  57. Marcus Aruelius says:

    This is rediculous, not helpful at all to the diologue about the wars and will inevitably be used by the right to radicalize us.

    Comment by Jim — July 28, 2007 @ 2:37 pm

    Make them answer the goddamned question: Why the cover up? Why the claim of Executive Privilege?


  58. The Republic of Stupidity says:

    turning this into a political conspiracy, that amid the confusion and friendly fire there was a political fragging going on, with no evidence to that, is merely sensationalist speculation that should be beneath this blog.

    Comment by Kevin — July 28, 2007

    Unfortunately, Kevin, the train has no on at the controls. Is this speculation getting out of hand? Yeeeaaah… but then the way the Bushies have handled this right from the start enabled this mess to mushroom out of control. Ain’t no stopping it now. The more the WH tries to bottle this up, the more the speculation is going to grow, and the collateral damage, shall we say, is already bad and only going to get worse. Toooo BAD!!! Last stop… Pennsylvania Ave!!!


  59. Spudge_Boy says:

    This is rediculous, not helpful at all to the diologue about the wars and will inevitably be used by the right to radicalize us.

    Comment by Jim — July 28, 2007 @ 2:37 pm

    Cocern Troll


  60. The Republic of Stupidity says:

    3 shots in the forehead at close range from an automatic rifle? Geez, that would pretty much take the top of Tillman’s head right off, wouldn’t it?

    Was his family allowed to even see the body? What did people think when they saw the wounds?


  61. ace says:

    #

    This is rediculous, not helpful at all to the diologue about the wars and will inevitably be used by the right to radicalize us.

    Comment by Jim — July 28, 2007 @ 2:37 pm

    Us?

    I have no concern about being defined as radical by these Nazis.


  62. AngryOne says:

    While the Tillman affair is spawning conspiracy theories on all sides, it is once again drawing attention to Ann Coulter and other conservatives’ apparent comfort with fragging itself.

    For the details, see:
    “Fragging Rights.”


  63. doro says:

    # 37, 38

    Sorry veritas, I don’t quite follow you there and believe me some of it is just the wish that there is not another Hitler lurking, this time with nukes.

    I’ve read Al Gore’s “An Assault on reason” and I’m a couple of pages into Glenn Greenwald’s “A tragic legacy” and both show, that the development of the political situation within the US shows indeed many traits of deliberation. The deliberate disinformation, the deliberate demolition of any oversight, the equally deliberate eroding of your constitution, it’s all there. (read Glenn Greenwald’s description of the Manichean Candidate very revealing) But this is in fact the very reason why I believe, Pat Tillman’s death wasn’t a plot to kill an inconvenient critic. I believe this administration in it’s quest to enhance the power of the executive branch to unseen and largely undemocratic levels, is adamant on not being required to inform anybody on anything they do. And there is where ineptitude comes in: They don’t even realize it when it hurts them. You can see that by their approval numbers.

    And please don’t tell me the next elections will be cancelled, due to a martial war situation, brought on by the Adminstration. I don’t believe that either. There will be elections and there will be a new president and there will be change. But the new administration will quickly adopt some of the enhanced powers of the executive. More if it’s Republican, a bit less if it’s Democratic. That is the real legacy, that you should worry about. The Bush administration has accomplished the partial destruction of Democracy in your country.


  64. tablogloid says:

    I know nothing except that Pat Tillman was killed in Afghanistan on my birthday, April 22.


  65. dbadass says:

    I know nothing except that Pat Tillman was killed in Afghanistan on my birthday, April 22.

    Comment by tablogloid — July 28, 2007 @ 2:48 pm

    Sounds to me like you know quite a bit


  66. The Republic of Stupidity says:

    For the details, see:
    “Fragging Rights.”

    Comment by AngryOne — July 28, 2007

    Nice, AngryOne. This is a totally self-created mess on the part of the WH at this point. Funny, no GOOPERs individually self-destructed in public this week, but it was still another bad week for them overall. Perhaps Larry Flynt will finally reveal the name of his mystery Sen next eek to keep the trainwreck moving.


  67. shane says:

    I think were drifting over the cliff a bit with this one. calling for openness, yes. turning this into a political conspiracy, that amid the confusion and friendly fire there was a political fragging going on, with no evidence to that, is merely sensationalist speculation that should be beneath this blog.

    Comment by Kevin — July 28, 2007 @ 2:07 pm

    Concern troll in at #1, gee they’re efficient.


  68. doro says:

    #60 TRoS, to cite a thread from below,

    .. this is a visual I could have done without…


  69. Marcus Aruelius says:

    Comment by doro — July 28, 2007 @ 2:48 pm

    we’ll have to wait to see what the next election brings (or even if there will ba elections – it wouldn’t surprise me if they tried to cancel them). as for our country/constitution/economy/national stature being trashed, well that’s not news in here.


  70. Tobey Tall says:

    This Pat Tillman story has been on Alex Jones website for a couple years now

    His parents have been fighting for years to get this in the mainstream

    WHY NOW ???


  71. Wayne A. Schneider says:

    Perhaps Larry Flynt will finally reveal the name of his mystery Sen next eek to keep the trainwreck moving.

    Comment by The Republic of Stupidity — July 28, 2007 @ 2:51 pm

    When’s the next issue of hustler due out?


  72. Spudge_Boy says:

    Pat Tillman’s wounds were consistent that would come from being shot from 10 yards away. You don’t mistake an American soldier for an insurgent/terrorist from 10 yards away.

    The medical examiner called for an ivestigation into foul play and the military ignored the request.

    PAT TILLMAN WA MURDERED.


  73. mr. bush goes to hell says:

    Let’s see…

    If there was a Democrat as President, would Rush, Coulter, Malkin and Hannity and O’Reilly be SILENT???

    Nope, tjey would be SCREAMING 24/7 for investigations and IMPEACHMENT of the Democratic President.

    Their SILENCE shows that they are unamerican HYPOCRITES.

    Just more TREASON by AWOL COWARD war criminal Bush and the PNAC.


  74. Chocolat Jesus + God Help Us into uranUs says:

    This doesnt make sense. Supposedly, there was no enemy in the area..so why was this O’Neal guy next to Tillman, hugging the ground and crying?….Was it perphaps because someone did in fact have thier guns trained on them?

    I am trying to come up with theories..

    http://www.forbes.com/ feeds/ ap/ 2007/ 07/ 26/ ap3958728.html

    ‘ It has been widely reported by the AP and others that Spc. Bryan O’Neal, who was at Tillman’s side as he was killed, told investigators that Tillman was waving his arms shouting “Cease fire, friendlies, I am Pat (expletive) Tillman, damn it!” again and again.

    But the latest documents give a different account from a chaplain who debriefed the entire unit days after Tillman was killed.

    The chaplain said that O’Neal told him he was hugging the ground at Tillman’s side, “crying out to God, help us. And Tillman says to him, `Would you shut your (expletive) mouth? God’s not going to help you; you need to do something for yourself, you sniveling …”


  75. Spudge_Boy says:

    This Pat Tillman story has been on Alex Jones website for a couple years now

    His parents have been fighting for years to get this in the mainstream

    WHY NOW ???

    Comment by Tobey Tall — July 28, 2007 @ 2:54 pm

    Because now the medical examiner has stepped forward. His evidence is shocking and horrifying. read my post at #72.


  76. troqua says:

    The only reason the fragging issue arises is because of the bizarro executive priviledge claim. I cannot for the life of me see where or how this claim is legitimate, even considering how fast and loose the administration plays with it. Obviously they were deeply involved with the subsequent coverup, and the coverup was done for political reasons.


  77. The Republic of Stupidity says:

    #60 TRoS, to cite a thread from below,

    .. this is a visual I could have done without…

    Comment by doro — July 28, 2007

    Sorry. The thought of Rush Limbaugh naked is both gross and funny. The visual of Pat Tillman’s fatal wounds is simply gross. I think sometimes people need to visualize the reality behind the words to get the full impact of the situation. 3 shots in the forehead at close range /w an automatic rifle?

    Hideous way to die, and couldn’t possibly be an accident or the result of a chaotic, random fire fight. I don’t see how that could possibly NOT been deliberate, if this is true. More than one person must have seen those wounds. What could they have possibly thought?


  78. Most Henious Troll says:

    Tillman was killed by the BushCo Cheny/Halliburton war machine/cabal.

    He was about to release some top secret info on Bush so Bush had him taken care of if you know what I mean.

    Just insurance.

    Now play nice boys and girls this is my sandbox.


  79. Spudge_Boy says:

    “The only reason the fragging issue arises is because of the bizarro executive priviledge claim. I cannot for the life of me see where or how this claim is legitimate”

    Read post #72


  80. The Republic of Stupidity says:

    When’s the next issue of hustler due out?

    Comment by Wayne A. Schneider — July 28, 2007

    Hmm… Wayne? Does Jayne know you ask questions like this??


  81. Wayne A. Schneider says:

    Comment by Spudge_Boy — July 28, 2007 @ 2:56 pm

    I agree. And those aware of this who remained silent are complicit accessories to murder, and could be charged with murder themselves. The military does not take murder lightly. Even if a few more generals (like the one that attended the funeral) have to resign, they should still be liable for criminal prosecution in the civilian sector.

    Correct me if I’m wrong, Spudge, but retiring or resigning their commissions would only protect them from UCMJ action, right? They could still face charges in the civilian court system if they were accessories?


  82. Tobey Tall says:

    If I remember correctly Pat Tillmans Parents had accepted the official story (lie) until a marine tipped them off in a letter to look closer


  83. shane says:

    They are protecting Chomsky!!!

    Comment by Epictetus — July 28, 2007 @ 2:19 pm

    This is Mr. President, although I’m sure he’s aleady told everybody.


  84. Most Henious Troll says:

    Yes it was MURDER in the 1st degree.

    Bush is very evil.


  85. Marcus Aruelius says:

    The only reason the fragging issue arises is because of the bizarro executive priviledge claim. I cannot for the life of me see where or how this claim is legitimate, even considering how fast and loose the administration plays with it. Obviously they were deeply involved with the subsequent coverup, and the coverup was done for political reasons.

    Comment by troqua — July 28, 2007 @ 2:57 pm

    And until they come clean – I’m insisting it was murder, ordered by Bush himself.


  86. Spudge_Boy says:

    “Spudge, but retiring or resigning their commissions would only protect them from UCMJ action, right?”

    Interseting question. While I was in the military, I am not a lawyer. I would think that it would fall under UCMJ, since the crime occured while they were still in the military. But, I am not 100% sure.


  87. Wayne A. Schneider says:

    Comment by The Republic of Stupidity — July 28, 2007 @ 2:59 pm

    Actually, I was baiting you. I truthfully don’t read it, or buy it, or have any around the house. (But I fully support his right to publish it.) I figured if I got an answer out of you, then it would mean you must be a regular buyer. ;)

    I also ask because that’s likely the time we might find out that other senator’s name. That was the real point of my asking. Seriously. I don’t need the magazine. thank you.


  88. TripMaster Monkey says:

    There seems to be a surfeit of concern trolls on this thread today…quite a few people admonishing the rest of us to let this go, lest we be perceived as “conspiracy nuts”.

    Pat Tillman was murdered. The range (10 yards) and grouping (less than 2 inches) of the three M-16 shells in his forehead leaves absolutely no doubt of this. The subsequent attempts at cover-up (claiming first that Pat died from enemy fire (AK-47), and then claiming he was accidentally killed by friendly fire (50-cal from 100 yards)) prove complicity in this murder at the highest levels of our government. Anyone who isn’t sufficiently alarmed by these facts to demand answers and punishment of the guilty parties is just as complicit as our government is.


  89. curmudgeon says:

    If one were to make the following assumptions —

    1 — That Pat Tillman was thought likely to become a poster child for the anti-war movement upon his return to the United States.
    2 — That he was executed.

    then the Neocons could have achieved several objectives simultaneously by taking such actions:

    1 — A potentially important voice for the anti-war movement would be forever silenced.
    2 — His death could be glorified and used to enhance recruiting.
    3 — Anyone else thinking of doing what John Kerry did on his return from Vietnam might think better of it, and remain quiet.
    4 — Anyone with knowledge of what occurred would have powerful incentives to remain silent, risking their careers and lives if they didn’t.

    Executive privilege? What do they have to hide?


  90. Tobey Tall says:

    80 “The military does not take murder lightly.

    Iraqis dont think that ????

    also thats the militaries job ???? kill and destroy


  91. The Republic of Stupidity says:

    I notice the trolls have given up on this one for the time being. Funny how they vamoose when the FACTS get a little too ugly to just laugh away or crap all over.

    Wouldn’t doubt if we get swarmed ala the Conservative talkshow thread sometime soon.


  92. Wayne A. Schneider says:

    Just having a little harmless fun with you, TRoS. I gotta go now. I might have window of opportunity to fionish mowing the middle of my lawn. Or not. I think I heard thuunder. If I can just get it running for twenty minutes, I can run through it practically befor the rain comes. Hopefully it;s dry enough from this morning’s rain. Boy, wa that OT. Sorry.


  93. Most Henious Troll says:

    Chomsky sez,

    “You never need an argument against the use of violence, you need an argument for it.”

    Praise Chomsky our enlightened leader


  94. Enzino says:

    Please can someone of you soldiers inform Unbeliveble that I love her and her Guido’s parents too! Thank you soldiers…; )


  95. Wayne A. Schneider says:

    Comment by Tobey Tall — July 28, 2007 @ 3:04 pm

    You’re right. Silly of me not to be more specific. Of course being a USAF vet, I was thinking only in terms of our own military. I did not mean for it to apply to all military forces throughout the world.

    Thank you for prompting me to clarify.


  96. Paul in LA says:

    OT: The Honorable Jerry Brown, Attorney General
    Attorney General’s Office
    California Department of Justice
    Attn: Public Inquiry Unit
    P.O. Box 944255
    Sacramento, CA 94244-2550

    Please write to AG Jerry Brown (the former governor) and ask him to prosecute Sequoia, Diebold, and Hart for CONTRACT FRAUD, seeking refunds and damages for their laughably faulty equipment,

    and also to open investigations into the business ties of Registrars of Voters in California who have abused their offices LOBBYING for these illegal votefraud machines, and for their violations of the California constitution and relevant voting rights statutes. Thank you.

    • Refer him to the study: http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/elections_vsr.htm

    • READ THE SUMMARY (it’s quite shocking): http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/voting_systems/ttbr/red_overview.pdf


  97. shane says:

    This is rediculous, not helpful at all to the diologue about the wars and will inevitably be used by the right to radicalize us.

    Comment by Jim — July 28, 2007 @ 2:37 pm

    I believe your “us” is at Drudge, not here.


  98. ace says:

    #

    This Pat Tillman story has been on Alex Jones website for a couple years now

    His parents have been fighting for years to get this in the mainstream

    WHY NOW ???

    Comment by Tobey Tall — July 28, 2007 @ 2:54 pm
    #

    The collective will to believe the previously unbelievable – is a direct result of the administration’s own lies – revealed.

    * Feb. 7, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, to U.S. troops in Aviano, Italy: “It is unknowable how long that conflict will last. It could last six days, six weeks. I doubt six months.”

    * March 4, Air Force Gen. Richard Myers, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, at a breakfast with reporters: “What you’d like to do is have it be a short, short conflict. . . . Iraq is much weaker than they were back in the ’90s,” when its forces were routed from Kuwait.

    * March 11, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, in a speech to the Veterans of Foreign Wars: “The Iraqi people understand what this crisis is about. Like the people of France in the 1940s, they view us as their hoped-for liberator.”

    * March 16, Vice President Cheney, on NBC’s Meet the Press: “I think things have gotten so bad inside Iraq, from the standpoint of the Iraqi people, my belief is we will, in fact, be greeted as liberators. . . . I think it will go relatively quickly, . . . (in) weeks rather than months.” He predicted that regular Iraqi soldiers would not “put up such a struggle” and that even “significant elements of the Republican Guard . . . are likely to step aside.”

    * Pat Robertson: “He was just sitting there, like, I’m on top of the world, and I warned him about this war. I had deep misgivings about this war, deep misgivings. And I was trying to say, ‘Mr. President, you better prepare the American people for casualties,’ ” Robertson said.

    “Oh, no, we’re not going to have any casualties,” Robertson quoted Bush as saying. ” ‘Well,’ I said, ‘it’s the way it’s going to be. . . . The Lord told me it was going to be, A, a disaster and, B, messy.’ “


  99. crimedog says:

    blah blah one less liberal to worry about


  100. Most Henious Troll says:

    The question of whether Tillman was killed for his political views lingers greater than ever….

    No we know he was killed look at the evidence leaves no doubt.

    We know he was a free thinker. But it leads you to think was this guy killed possibly by people that didn’t like his political views or was he killed accidentally?

    There is no such thing as an accident with Evil Bush Co.

    He was EBCed.


  101. mr. bush goes to hell says:

    It just shows us what a TRAITOR Bush REALLY is.

    “executive privilege”, indeed…


  102. ace says:

    #

    The only reason the fragging issue arises is because of the bizarro executive priviledge claim. I cannot for the life of me see where or how this claim is legitimate, even considering how fast and loose the administration plays with it. Obviously they were deeply involved with the subsequent coverup, and the coverup was done for political reasons.

    Comment by troqua — July 28, 2007 @ 2:57 pm

    The likelihood is that Karl Rove is intricately involved in this entire affair. The administration has already violated both the law, and the people’s trust, by allowing his POLITICAL OPERATIVE to operate from OUR HOUSE – with a full security clearance – on all matters political – which is virtually EVERYTHING in Rove’s mind.

    The only way to prevent the PEOPLE who own that White House from discovering just how politicized it has become is to prevent EVERY inquiry into the actions of KARL ROVE,

    T H E

    A R C H I T E C T


  103. Zooey says:

    There needs to be a full and independent investigation of Tillman’s death. EP be damned. Tillman’s family deserves to know exactly what happened to their son. This is shameful.

    Good call, Faiz.


  104. Pat Tillman says:

    I was killed becuase I was a snitch!


  105. dbadass says:

    blah blah one less liberal to worry about

    Comment by crimedog — July 28, 2007 @ 3:11 pm

    There is a certain level of dignity that accompanies death and bereavement. All cultures have norms which reguire honor for the deceased. Manners?


  106. doro says:

    Comment by TripMaster Monkey — July 28, 2007 @ 3:03 pm

    TMM, just in case I accidentally find myself considered as one of the trolls.

    a) I do not doubt the death of Pat Tillman was murder.
    b) I do think it’s of the utmost importance to find out what the exact circumstances of Pat Tillman’s death were and find and punish the culprit. The family needs this to be able to find peace and closure, as every family of every victim needs this.

    I just don’t believe, the Administration instigated this murder. If you see the cover up as an attempt to obstruct justice and thus of complicity, I can follow you. Another reason for impeachment.


  107. Paul in LA says:

    Hey 98, go say that to Kevin Tillman, you COWARD.

    If you do, there will be another goddamned troll less to worry about.

    You’re going to need a lot more than a purple heart bandaid after the buttwhipping you deserve, you unamerican hate-the-troops Republican bushlicker.


  108. Marcus Aruelius says:

    I was killed becuase I was a snitch!

    Comment by Pat Tillman — July 28, 2007 @ 3:17 pm

    Watch you mouth you dirty, cowardly, traitorous, soldier-slandering, neocon pig. Someday somebody’s going to Fu(k you up, but good.


  109. CT Scan says:

    Comment by Pat Tillman — July 28, 2007 @ 3:18 pm

    Knock it off.


  110. Most Henious Troll says:

    They are all (Congress) corrupt protecting the Bush cabal that is evil, lying, greedy, murderous, cold bloody killers, oil loving, money hording,evil, evil, evil men and women all of them.

    TP is the only place where the truth is spoken freely and openly.

    You are brave ones TP but you are putting your families in danger so be aware. Bushco is listening right now deciding who is next on the hit list.

    Let the truth come we are not afraid brothers and sisters in the struggle.

    Peace out.


  111. doro says:

    # 98 crimedog

    just to quote my son:

    “If this a****hole gets what he deserves his b*lls and pr*ck will closely resemble an English breakfast!”


  112. Spudge_Boy says:

    blah blah one less liberal to worry about

    Comment by crimedog — July 28, 2007 @ 3:11 pm

    And her you see the face of the domestic enemy living amongst us. THey are fascist Nazis that will stop at anything to try and force there idealogies on the world at the point of a weapon.


  113. Most Henious Troll says:

    T H E

    A R C H I T E C T

    Comment by ace

    This one gets it and he knows too much.

    I have seen this name on Karl’s “things to do list”.

    Be very careful ace.


  114. Spudge_Boy says:

    I have seen this name on Karl’s “things to do list”.

    Be very careful ace.

    Comment by Most Henious Troll — July 28, 2007 @ 3:26 pm

    Ace you’re famous. w00t!!!!


  115. Zooey says:

    just to quote my son:

    “If this a****hole gets what he deserves his b*lls and pr*ck will closely resemble an English breakfast!”

    Comment by doro — July 28, 2007 @ 3:24 pm

    Doro,

    Your son is a fine and articulate young man. ;-)


  116. Wayne A. Schneider says:

    Comment by doro — July 28, 2007 @ 3:19 pm

    Well elucidated, doro. I agree with you. I believe it will take more than this apparent evidence of a cover-up to move up to conspiracy to commit murder. But the cover-up makes them accesories to murder, punishable as murderers themselves. But we do need to learn the whole truth, from everybody involved.

    Perhaps we could let the family learn the entire truth and, based on how it affects them, let them decide who should be prosecuted. Not sent to jail, but put through the legal system like everyone else. Unless someone knows them personally and knows differently, I could imagine that perhaps the cover-up of the lie was worse then the lie itself to them, and they were more harmed by that than by the initial lie. Or perhaps the reverse. Give them the truth, and let them decide against whom charges should be pressed.

    But someone sure as hell better get more than just a goddamn demotion out of this!


  117. Most Henious Troll says:

    Pat Tillman was killed to be an example to the other soldiers.
    We know this.


  118. shane says:

    You’re going to need a lot more than a purple heart bandaid after the buttwhipping you deserve, you unamerican hate-the-troops Republican bushlicker.

    Comment by Paul in LA — July 28, 2007 @ 3:21 pm

    Well said Paul. Crimepuppy had me tongue-tied. The nerve of these neocons, cheering on the death of a true patriot. I was speechless.


  119. Juan C says:

    In every sense, each one of those dead soldiers have been killed by US admin.


  120. Tobey Tall says:

    WHY NOW release this info

    because it will take away that all important 1% from Bush making him the worst president in American history


  121. doro says:

    Doro,

    Your son is a fine and articulate young man. ;-)

    Comment by Zooey — July 28, 2007 @ 3:28 pm

    and

    Comment by Wayne A. Schneider — July 28, 2007 @ 3:28 pm

    Yeah Zooey, but as he’s only 10 I sometmes wonder, whether he grows up a little fast. ;-))

    Wayne,

    Amen to that. To get the truth to this family is worth fighting an blogging for. And that’s why it is a good thing for TP to have covered the topic.

    btw. It’s 9:30 p.m. over here and that loudmouth ten year old is still not in bed. I guess I’ll have to make sure he gets there. Maybe I’m around again later.

    Enjoy yourselves!


  122. Juan C says:

    blah blah one less liberal to worry about
    Comment by crimedog

    This comment, even joking, shows the contempt these people has regarding human life. These people should be wiped off the planet.


  123. shane says:

    You are brave ones TP but you are putting your families in danger so be aware. Bushco is listening right now deciding who is next on the hit list.

    Let the truth come we are not afraid brothers and sisters in the struggle.

    Peace out.

    Comment by Most Henious Troll — July 28, 2007 @ 3:23 pm

    If not US, then WHO?

    If not NOW, then WHEN?

    This country did not become great because the people were afraid or complacent. If TP and other progressive sites are the only citizens speaking truth to power, then we need to speak loud and clear about what we know for certain and what we suspect.


  124. Juan C says:

  125. IdahoMoe says:

    This is rediculous, not helpful at all to the diologue about the wars and will inevitably be used by the right to radicalize us.

    Comment by Jim — July 28, 2007 @ 2:37 pm

    I disagree. We need to rub the GOPs noses in their own shiite 24/7 until we get the truth. Thanks for your CONCERN Jim.


  126. Tobey Tall says:

    115/ Pat Tillman was killed to be an example to the other soldiers.
    We know this.

    could also be the reason The White house has cited executive privilege in refusing to turn over records that would verify how much Bush knew.

    In order to shut the troops up STILL, keep them scared


  127. shane says:

    Be very careful ace.

    Comment by Most Henious Troll — July 28, 2007 @ 3:26 pm

    Well CT I see you were paying attention when I gave you this name the other day. And since you’ve been after ace for monhs you copletely blew your cover.

    Ace and other TP regulars are not like you, we’re not afraid of our shadows. And we’re not afraid of you and your scare tactics. Nice try at an enormously evil, unAmerican ploy.


  128. shane says:

    Pat Tillman was killed to be an example to the other soldiers.
    We know this.

    Comment by Most Henious Troll — July 28, 2007 @ 3:30 pm

    CT, most heinous troll is what you are. You are also trying to intimidate poster by pointing out threats while pretending to be one of us. You are a Fearmongering Facist. Why don’t you use that name next.


  129. The Republic of Stupidity says:

    Why don’t you use that name next.

    Comment by shane — July 28, 2007

    Nice call, Shane. That was pretty much my reaction to that comment too.

    Unfortunatley, it stays on this thread, and someoen like BillO can now latch onto it and claim this is what the “Libruls” believe.


  130. Chocolat Jesus God Help Us into uranUs says:

    sorry to repost but I’m wondering if anybody has any theories that jive with the facts as they were recounted by the debriefer….

    This doesnt make sense. Supposedly, there was no enemy in the area..so why was this O’Neal guy next to Tillman, hugging the ground and crying?….Was it perphaps because someone did in fact have thier guns trained on them?

    I am trying to come up with theories..

    http://www.forbes.com/ feeds/ ap/ 2007/ 07/ 26/ ap3958728.html

    ‘ It has been widely reported by the AP and others that Spc. Bryan O’Neal, who was at Tillman’s side as he was killed, told investigators that Tillman was waving his arms shouting “Cease fire, friendlies, I am Pat (expletive) Tillman, damn it!” again and again.

    But the latest documents give a different account from a chaplain who debriefed the entire unit days after Tillman was killed.

    The chaplain said that O’Neal told him he was hugging the ground at Tillman’s side, “crying out to God, help us. And Tillman says to him, `Would you shut your (expletive) mouth? God’s not going to help you; you need to do something for yourself, you sniveling …”


  131. shane says:

    Unfortunatley, it stays on this thread, and someoen like BillO can now latch onto it and claim this is what the “Libruls” believe.

    Comment by The Republic of Stupidity — July 28, 2007 @ 3:49 pm

    Luckily I believe the more O’Lielly froths from this stuff, the more crazy he looks. For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. And I think BillO may not be achieving his desired purpose.


  132. pete says:

    Hi all. I have a few thoughts to offer now.

    It is impossible for ANY marksman, under ANY conditions, with ANY weapon, to place three shots into a head sized target without identifying the target and taking careful aim. It is impossible to accidentally place three shots in a head sized target. The only way the described results could have occurred is that someone deliberately shot Corporal Tillman while he was unaware of an imminent threat or was immobilized.

    I think it most likely that he was intentionally killed by person, or persons, unknown for personal reasons. It is incomprehensible that no one has been charged for this gross dereliction of duty that may amount to cold blooded, premeditated, murder.

    While the “players” are not all known; released information proves that direct knowledge of this incident has been intentionally concealed and misrepresented. (NOTE: if you don’t think that the punishment of seven military officers constitutes proof of misconduct, there’s no need for you to read further. Or read anything else. Ever.)

    As fun as it may be to speculate; it is premature, and possibly irresponsible, to make assumptions of a politically motivated conspiratorial execution. The thing to keep in mind though is that there is no legal difference between previous knowledge, and subsequent knowledge, when it comes to a murder charge. Those who intentionally corrupt information in a murder investigation may be charged as accessories to the crime. And they need not have been involved in the planning and execution of the crime.

    In short. It need never be proved that a person to have participated in a murder to suffer the full penalties for the crime. All that is needed is proof that the investigation was willfully impeded to protect the guilty parties.

    Claims of executive privilege, as it relates to this case, seem highly irregular and inappropriate. However, I see no reason to believe that the WH is concealing information that would be tantamount to aiding and abetting an individual murderer. Rather, it is far more likely that they are attempting to protect themselves from political/professional embarrassment over their, continual, gross incompetence. Make no mistake; it is likely that various parties involved in this shameful matter will face criminal prosecution.


  133. Moderation says:

    Based on Tillman’s final words, ““Would you shut your f*cking mouth? God’s not going to help you; you need to do something for yourself, you sniveling…”, he knew what was coming. He knew he was about to be murdered by whomever ended up doing so. Why would he know this was coming?

    Wanna bet he wasn’t even killed by fellow Rangers?

    Who else is on the scene in Iraq, has a massive military presence, has no oversight conducted on them, and has a vested political interest in maintaining their presence in Iraq due to the President’s policies, and, because they are profit-based, additionally have an economic interest in maintaining said conflict? Who could U.S. soldiers be killed by, and have it be technically considered “friendly fire”, other than our foreign allies, and these, domestic so-called “allies”?

    Who else would cause an Army Ranger like Tillman’s squad-member to react in an extraordinarily unusual manner for a soldier so well-trained? Who else would be allowed to get within 10 yards of an Army Ranger position without drawing hostile fire?

    How much would you like to bet that Blackwater was hired to murder Pat Tillman?


  134. The Republic of Stupidity says:

    And I think BillO may not be achieving his desired purpose.

    Comment by shane — July 28, 2007

    I hope you’re right, Shane. I’m starting to wonder if some of the nastier posts that get left here are done simply to make TP look bad. This whole “troll” thing sure is strange, isn’t it?

    I also noticed taht the trolls have abandoned this thread completely, for the time being. Not too many good ways to spin this mess, huh?


  135. troqua says:

    pete, you are awesome. You have put my own thoughts into a thoughtful, reasoned post that I could not. Thanks.


  136. ace says:

    Moderation:

    Or Mossad?


  137. The Republic of Stupidity says:

    How much would you like to bet that Blackwater was hired to murder Pat Tillman?

    Comment by Moderation — July 28, 2007

    I understand why you’re saying this, but it is speculation at this time. We don’t need to do anything here, other than keep bringing it up. This has become a runaway train for the Bushies and the end of the line would appear to be the WH. This is going to be ugly.


  138. Moderation says:

    Even if not hired to do the job, and even if it truly were an accident, or the actions of one or two “gung-ho” individuals, if it became known that Tillman was killed by a mercenary company that has no oversight conducted on it, and is currently answerable to no one. perhaps demands for oversight on our mercenary outfits would shine too bright a spotlight where the administration wants to stay in the shadows.

    The needn’t be a single actual connection with the administration over such an incident for them to want it covered up. The activities of the mercenary forces in Iraq connected to Blackwater and similar corporations are a virtual unknown. They could be committing 99% of the war crimes over there done by “our side” and we wouldn’t know it because they have no legitimate oversight conducted on them. These outfits need to be reigned in completely. Really, merc units like Blackwater should be outlawed in this country.

    No corporate armies. Bad, bad news, that.


  139. tom baker says:

    Unfortunately, “fragged” was the first thing that crossed my mind when I heard Tillman’s death was from “friendly fire”. He was too true a warrior, and too astute a man, to belong to the cirscumstances history provided him.

    Funny how real heroes contrast with those who proclaim heroism.


  140. Moderation says:

    I understand why you’re saying this, but it is speculation at this time. We don’t need to do anything here, other than keep bringing it up. This has become a runaway train for the Bushies and the end of the line would appear to be the WH. This is going to be ugly.

    Comment by The Republic of Stupidity — July 28, 2007 @ 4:43 pm

    Absolutely I have no evidence, and phrased it as a question quite purposefully. It is complete speculation. But it is one of the few reasons I’ve been able to come up with for why the admin would use Executive Privilege in this affair.

    The only reasons I’ve been able to come up with for the citing of EP in this case are:

    1) The administration ordered it. This is the least likely, and the most horrific if we find it to be true.

    2) A few rogue elements in the U. S. military decided to do this of their own accord. The administration suppressed it, and then tried to capitalize on it politically.

    3) On of our intelligence agencies decided to do this of their own accord. The administration suppressed it, and then tried to capitalize on it politically.

    4) One of our mercenary outfits decided to do this of their own accord. The administration suppressed it, and then tried to capitalize on it politically. This, the U.S. military option, and the intelligence asset option all fall within the same general premise, but each come from different sectors, and each brings with it unique implications.

    That’s it. We know it was some sort of friendly, close-range attack that Tillman did not have time to retaliate against. He knew something was amiss, he knew he was about to die, and his fellow Ranger acted extraordinarily odd for such a highly-trained specialist, especially if it were Iraqis, Al-Qaeda or any other insurgent group present in the region. Something freaked that soldier out, and that something carried an M-16, and got within 10 yards of those Rangers without being fired upon.


  141. pete says:

    Moderation, I don’t enjoy bursting your bubble but, Corporal Tillman was killed in Afghanistan and I don’t believe there were “contractors” in the area. I think it far more likely that an unidentified person, or persons, in Tillman’s unit killed him for their own reasons.

    However, this doesn’t excuse the shameful (criminal?) way the incident was handled by the military and government officials involved.


  142. Moderation says:

    Afghanistan, right, sorry. And I read the whole series of articles, too. Ok, then scratch the Blackwater. It was military, or it was intelligence, but the point that whomever it was carried an M-16, and got within 10 yards of those Rangers without being fired upon still stands.

    Afghanistan, right. Gah.


  143. veritas says:

    Spent the last couple of hours cogitating on why the president would claim executive privilege when it comes to an investigation of Tillman’s death – something which he should believe that he owes to the Tillman family and all americans as their employee.

    For me, it distills down to one of two things: 1) either he was personally involved in the coverup or Rove was which becomes a clear ‘obstruction of justice’ charge, aka “yet another impeachable offense” or 2) this death travels much deeper than just some renegade individual in his unit who disliked him and the fact that he was planning to meet with Chomsky was somehow threatening to this administration.

    Either way, the claim of exec. privilege is an indirect indictment of Bush himself.


  144. ace says:

    As for three shots closely spaced, would that not be the result of a quick burst of fire from an M-16? This is likely the theory they are using to establish the distance from the shooter to the victim.


  145. veritas says:

    Of course, option #1 is the “lesser of two very grave offenses – lesser of two evils”. One is a criminal charge of murder and the other is obstruction of justice. One is punishable in prison; the other will simply rid this country of this despot much sooner. And this is only one of the high crimes & misdemeanors which he has committed. Either way, whether it be The Hague or another international war crimes tribunal, I see a prison cell in this man’s future.


  146. ace says:

    Veritas:

    All roads point to Rove’s involvement. Whether it was his idea, or his coverup story, it’s the POLITICAL ADVISER inside the White House.

    They are protecting Rove – the only question is, to what degree.

    It’s not beyond him to have ordered the hit


  147. veritas says:

    Pete: A claim of executive privilege in this case ARE highly irregular and the most indicting thing he could have done to himself. One has to wonder why? I guess he fears his complicity in it all were he to cooperate with an investigation.


  148. tablogloid says:

    130. comment by moderation.

    NOTE TO MODERATION: Tillman was killed in Afghanistan.


  149. veritas says:

    I would say that the cover-up of this and the subsequent disinformation circulated to the Tillman Family are not just embarrassing to this administration – but a clear ‘obstruction of justice” charge as well.

    When are the hearings slated? Next week? Guess that’s why Bush will begin his vacation for a month??


  150. veritas says:

    Hey, Acey! I love it when I can find you on here! Then I know that we’re all in for some primo, factual information. Yep, this has the Rovian fingerprint all over it, doesn’t it? If Rove knew about it or even ordered it, you KNOW that Dubya was in on it as well…just as he was in on the Plame outing. It’s time to end this #hit going on…the people have defiinitely HAD ENOUGH~


  151. Moderation says:

    NOTE TO MODERATION: Tillman was killed in Afghanistan.

    Comment by tablogloid — July 28, 2007 @ 5:09 pm

    Read pose #138, above. Unlike some, I’ll gladly admit when I am wrong.


  152. veritas says:

    I read somewhere that the Coroner (some doc) attempted to begin an investigation into Tillman’s death and the investigation was squashed. By whom? When? This, also, has Rove’s prints all over it.


  153. ace says:

    “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, THE TRUTH IS THE GREATEST ENEMY OF THE STATE.”
    – Joseph Goebbels, German Minister of Propaganda, 1933-1945

    By: okiemon on September 27, 2006 at 10:24am

    “As people do better, they start voting like Republicans – unless they have too much education and vote Democratic, which proves there can be too much of a good thing.”

    Karl Rove.

    “See in my line of work you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda.”

    GEORGE w. BUSH

    Here’s a great comparison of Goebbels to Bush:

    http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/may2005/260505newbushism.htm


  154. veritas says:

    Scooter took the quick hit to end the investigation from running up the chain of command to W for the Plame outing; I don’t think it’s going to work again this time. I think Bush’s days are numbered as are Rove’s and, for all intents & purposes, he will return from vacation to a support figure in the teens.


  155. veritas says:

    If anyone here has a gift for spiritual work, they know that Rove is the reincarnation of Goebels. We know precisely whose energy we are dealing with in Bush – Hitler all over again.


  156. veritas says:

    There’s nothing new or even remotely intelligent or creative about what Rove has done. He’s plagiarized the playbook for the Third Reich and has the “cliff notes” from Joseph Goebbels at his bedside. He’s an empty shell actually.


  157. ace says:

    http://www.catalystmagazine.net/issues/story.cfm?story=475

    The Cult of Leo Strauss: Leo Strauss
    Could his broken heart have been the seed the grew into the war against Iraq?
    By Kitty Clark

    The celebrated philosopher-king of the neoconservatives forging America’s radical new foreign policy was a controversial philosophy professor at the University of Chicago. Leo Strauss, who died in 1973, was little known outside of academic and think-tank circles until this year, but the influence of his ideas has long been felt.

    “Why are so many Straussians in the Reagan Administration?” asked Newsweek in a 1987 article titled “The Cult of Leo Strauss.” “Some of their critics suggest that the brotherhood is committed to no less than halting the drift of modern democracy.” The Straussians, observed historian Gordon S. Wood in the New York Review of Books the following year, are the biggest phenomenon in 20th-century academia.

    Strauss’ ideas emerge from his life experience. Strauss fled Nazi Germany for the safety of America in 1937, and blamed not fascism but the Weimar Republic’s liberal democratic ideals for permitting the rise of Nazism. A classicist, he taught the works of Plato, Machiavelli, Nietzsche and Hobbes, instructing his students to look for secret “codes” in the texts. Truth, he believed, was the preserve of an elite few who might have to tell “noble lies” – an idea he lifted from Plato – to the uncomprehending masses. Are political entities, asked the charismatic Strauss, “not compelled to use force and fraud… if they are to prosper?”

    “‘Weapons of mass destruction’ would be a noble lie,” says Shadia Drury, a scholar who has written two books on Strauss, “because you’re convinced this [war on Iraq] is the right thing to do and you are the wise few, the elite, who are leading the stupid masses, and the stupid masses aren’t going to agree to sacrifice their lives for nothing – for the glory of the nation – unless their own survival is at stake.” So you tell them their own survival is at stake.

    Strauss believed that democracy, however flawed, was best defended by an ignorant public pumped up on nationalism and religion. Only a militantly nationalist state could deter human aggression, and since most people were naturally self-absorbed and hedonistic, Strauss believed that the only way to transform them was to make them love their nation enough to die for it. Such nationalism requires an external threat – and if one cannot be found, it must be manufactured.

    While not bound by religion himself, Strauss rather cynically promoted religion as a tool to maintain an acquiescent population. Authority and discipline are key values for Straussians, and the masses need religion to keep them in line. “Marx called religion the opium of the people,” says Drury. “Strauss thought the people needed their opium.”

    Neoconservatism has more complex roots than just the ideas of Leo Strauss, but it’s hard to ignore the uncanny similarities between Straussian thought and the decisions emanating from the Bush administration, where many of the neoconservatives in charge of foreign policy were taught by Strauss or his students. Many of the major players occupying the White House are descendants of the Jewish-American New York intellectuals who veered from the radical left (anti-Stalinist Trotskyism of the 1920s and ’30s) to the radical right (hence the “neo”). In between, they were allies of McCarthy in the fight against communism, and later joined the Reagan administration. They have nothing but contempt for the free-thinking idealism of the 1960s, with its emphasis on social equality (Strauss argued that the strong are fit to rule; the weak to be ruled), opposition to war (force is important and necessary), and feminism (Plato’s “philosopher-kings” are, by definition, men). But it wasn’t until the presidency of George W. Bush that they ascended to the pinnacle of power, bringing their ideas with them.

    “In the course of the past year, a new belief has emerged in the town [of Washington, DC]: the belief in war against Iraq,” wrote Ari Shavit in Ha’aretz, Israel’s leading daily newspaper, in April 2003. “That ardent faith was disseminated by a small group of 25 or 30 neoconservatives, almost all of them Jewish, almost all of them intellectuals… people who are mutual friends and cultivate one another and are convinced that political ideas are a major driving force of history.”

    New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman to Ari Shavit: “This is a war of an elite.” Laughing: “I could give you the names of 25 people – all of whom are at this moment within a five-block radius of this office – who, if you had exiled them to a desert island a year and a half ago, the Iraq war would not have happened.”


  158. ace says:

    If you want to understand the NeoCons, you have to go to the source, Leo Strauss. He believed in lying to the people, to control them. He taught Wolfowitz and had secret society of how to manipulate politically through lies, and religion. Welcome to the NeoCon reality, where your constitution means nothing, but the politicians create the reality. Strauss is best written about by Shadia Drury.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shadia_Drury

    http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Leo_Strauss

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leo_Strauss

    Critics of Strauss also accuse him of elitism and anti-democratic sentiment. Shadia Drury, author of 1999’s Leo Strauss and the American Right, argues that Strauss taught different things to different students, and inculcated an elitist strain in American political leaders that is linked to imperialist militarism and Christian fundamentalism. Drury accuses Strauss of teaching that “perpetual deception of the citizens by those in power is critical because they need to be led, and they need strong rulers to tell them what’s good for them.” Drury adds, “The Weimar Republic was his model of liberal democracy… liberalism in Weimar, in Strauss’s view, led ultimately to the Nazi Holocaust against the Jews.”

    Leo Strauss’ Philosophy of Deception

    By Jim Lobe, AlterNet. Posted May 19, 2003.

    Many neoconservatives like Paul Wolfowitz are disciples of a philosopher who believed that the elite should use deception, religious fervor and perpetual war to control the ignorant masses.

    http://www.alternet.org/story/15935/


  159. veritas says:

    Ace: Keep posting links. Some of us send them to everyone we know – all over the country and even to some newspapers. Keep the communication loop intact and do not allow the trolls, who function as the enemies of Truth, stop you.

    People are hard-wired for the Truth because we recognize that the Truth at any given moment is all that exists. Everything else is the fictionalized version of it.

    Thanks, Ace, for all the Truth you provide to all of us! Must run now – but will check back later for some more links…keep the info coming!
    Great posts, everyone.


  160. pete says:

    Obstruction of justice, in a murder case, is a short hop from “Accessory after the fact”. This would explain the frantic efforts to squelch “embarrassing” revelations.

    Another quick note, which is hardly relevant, is that the majority of deployed soldiers (including all Army Rangers) are equipped with M4 carbines rather than M16 rifles. Even though M4’s are shorter and lighter than M16’s there is no difference in their effect at short ranges and they use identical ammunition. However, it does make any claims for a long range incident less likely due to an M4 “scattering” it’s shots at longer ranges.


  161. Most Henious Troll says:

    Bush knew that Tillman knew too much, so he requested a little fix to silence him. Rove is an evil genius and knew how to make it look like an accident.

    The plot thickens with each new revelation…


  162. veritas says:

    Ace: With some of the Leo Strauss links you provided, I also can see how his nazi philosophy has permeated our country via the PNAC. We’ve also been able to out William Kristol, whose grandfather of the Neocon Fascist Agenda in this country – (*Irving Kristol – google him for some grins sometime!). Then we are better able to grasp just how penetrating and systemically contorted our democracy has become when we see just how many “straussians” received their PHD’s and teach in this country….their robots and stepfordians then go out and it grows exponentially. Thankfully, there are far more of us than there ever will be of them!


  163. ace says:

    Clearly there was a conspiracy between Libby and Cheney. Conspiracy is a legal term. Can we all be adults and discuss this and other related conspiracies without being accused of being “Conspiracy Theorists?”

    Having a theory about a conspiracy was a prerequisite for Fitzgerald’s investigators. It’s time to praise those who are able to think outside the box and comprehend the means, motive and opportunity that leads to these types of Conspiracies.

    It’s time to raise the level of discourse where the term “Conspiracy” is concerned:

    http://www.globalsecurity.org/intell/library/reports/2005/franklin_indictment_04aug2005.htm

    We’ve all been conditioned to snicker and ridicule when non-professionals offer theories about conspiracies. It’s time to talk about all of these theories and unravel the whole thing.


  164. Aristocles son of Ariston says:

    (Plato’s “philosopher-kings” are, by definition, men) – ace
    ——————————-

    ace… why are you telling LIES about me?

    I am not at all against feminism…

    In fact, I was one of the first to assert that women and men have equal capacities of intelligence. I even say that women can be guardians, what you would call “Philosopher-Queens” …..

    Read “The Republic, Book V, 454 – 456″ before you spit more LIES about me, you LIAR!


  165. CT Scan says:

    Comment by shane — July 28, 2007 @ 3:46 pm

    M’kay, skank. Do yourself that favor now and throw yourself off that bridge.

    You’re simply looking for trouble, even if that means falsely accusing others. That’s the name of the game of senile douches.

    STFU.


  166. Tobey Tall says:

    The article also reveals that “Army attorneys sent each other congratulatory e-mails for keeping criminal investigators at bay as the Army conducted an internal friendly-fire investigation that resulted in administrative, or non-criminal, punishments.”

    Figure that one out

    http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2007/07/26/ap3958728.html


  167. CT Scan says:

    Comment by shane — July 28, 2007 @ 3:46 pm

    As a Muslim sucker, you’re not qualified to gauge any body’s patriotism.

    STFU.

    Keep looking for a fight. I believe I directed you to ignore my posts, nonetheless.


  168. The Republic of Stupidity says:

    PNAC

    JooooOOOooOooOOOoOooOOOO software oh nooOOOOOooooo!

    Neocon robots stepfordians clones penetratin’ invadin’ spinnin’ Neofascist

    Comment by Flaco — July 28, 2007

    M’kay, skank. Do yourself that favor now and throw yourself off that bridge.

    You’re simply looking for trouble, even if that means falsely accusing others. That’s the name of the game of senile douches.

    STFU.

    Comment by CT Scan

    Go ahead, boys, knock yourselves out. This runaway train is headed right for the WH. This is NOT going away, and it will not be pretty.


  169. pete says:

    The seek what all people seek yet they fight over which path to take. Be they afraid to trod their chosen path alone?


  170. ace says:

    FLACO:

    Every time you post, it presents an opportunity to bury you and your aliases and operatives in facts an links – and to spread the truth that you are so desperate to keep hidden.

    I appreciate your help.

    Keep it up.


  171. CT Scan says:

    Quite interesting.

    ’shane’ thinks it made a “nice call,” yet it based its “call” simply by selecting the troll that points out its contradictory statements, whining and hypocrisy more than the others. ’shane’ even admitted that its disdain for CT exceeds that of any other troll. So yeah, its got an axe to grind.

    It’s simply venting and looking for payback, however jaded.


  172. CT Scan says:

    Comment by The Republic of Stupidity — July 28, 2007 @ 5:43 pm

    Yeah, the identical “runaway train” platform you snails ran in 2004.

    Looks as if that worked out pretty well.


  173. Aristocles son of Ariston says:

    ace!!!!!!!!!

    you LIED about me!!!

    I demand you correct you’re information in any future posts!!!!!!!!!!!!

    YOU DON’T WANT TO SPREAD LIES, DO YOU?


  174. pete says:

    A wise man can not be insulted for the truth can only instruct and lies are unworthy of notice.


  175. CT Scan says:

    Comment by ace — July 28, 2007 @ 5:48 pm

    Predictably, only ‘TripSurrender Monkey’ is buying your cheap garbage. It’s always good to see you maintaining your credibility problem.

    ‘ace’ is the place for cheap conspiracy hardware.


  176. pete says:

    And the guilty shall be judged by their words and deeds.


  177. The Republic of Stupidity says:

    eah, the identical “runaway train” platform you snails ran in 2004.

    Looks as if that worked out pretty well.

    Comment by CT Scan — July 28, 2007

    Now, THAT comment is truly hysterical. You’re missing your true calling – stand up comic. You put Dennis Miller to shame.

    BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

    We don’t have to do an f-ing thing, Michael. Last stop, Penn Ave…


  178. pete says:

    And they shall judge the innocent according to the guilt in their own souls.


  179. pete says:

    And the evil ones shall feast upon each other’s flesh until the evil is no more.


  180. Tobey Tall says:

    A wise man speaks because he has something to say A fool speaks cause they want to say something

    pretty much sums up the trolls spin technique


  181. The Republic of Stupidity says:

    Tillman was the mercenary!!! SCREW HIM!!!

    Comment by Flaco — July 28, 2007

    Flaco, after a comment like that, Pat Tillman’s LIVING brother would probably love to talk to you. Care to come forward so we can bring you 2 together, in a small room, w/ no way out?

    Tap… tap… waiting… tap… tap… hmmm… doesn’t want to back up his words, I guess. Must have found the back way out…


  182. Flaco says:

    a=rabs
    c=onspire
    e=vil

    Oh no JoOOOoOoOOOOoOOooooooooo software found me out.


  183. pete says:

    When they have cast aside all but their hate they shall destroy themselves in an orgy of insensate rage.


  184. pete says:

    And when the peace of truth settles upon the land they shall be cast out to strve in the wilderness.


  185. Flaco says:

    pete
    ru cerious? u a prophet bro?


  186. pete says:

    being wicked and twisted they are blind to all that is good and true.


  187. pete says:

    And they shall shout their lies till they are dumb.


  188. Flaco says:

    pete the TP sage and prophet welcome aboard mate

    You will fit right in with the ace.


  189. Flaco says:

    good will be evil & evil will be good…

    How is that pete?
    Can I be a prophet too?


  190. pete says:

    When the rage has passed they shall know no peace for they had slain their brothers and their mothers.


  191. Aristocles son of Ariston says:

    me too! i want 2 b a prophet!


  192. pete says:

    Devoid of reason they are barred from enlightenment.


  193. Aristocles son of Ariston says:

    nothing but money is sweeter than honey
    - ben franklin


  194. pete says:

    Unable to prove their false Truth they shall never know what is true.


  195. pete says:

    Bowed before their false Gods they can not realize the greatness within themselves.


  196. ace says:

    “Everybody has to move, run and grab as many hilltops as they can to enlarge the settlements because everything we take now will stay ours… Everything we don’t grab will go to them.” Ariel Sharon, Israeli Foreign Minister, addressing a meeting of militants from the extreme right-wing Tsomet Party, Agence France Presse, November 15, 1998.

    “It is the duty of Israeli leaders to explain to public opinion, clearly and courageously, a certain number of facts that are forgotten with time. The first of these is that there is no Zionism, colonialization or Jewish State without the eviction of the Arabs and the expropriation of their lands.” Yoram Bar Porath, Yediot Aahronot, of 14 July 1972.

    “One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail.” — Rabbi Yaacov Perrin, Feb. 27, 1994 [Source: N.Y. Times, Feb. 28, 1994, p. 1]

    “We Jews, we are the destroyers and will remain the destroyers. Nothing you can do will meet our demands and needs. We will forever destroy because we want a world of our own.” (You Gentiles, by Jewish Author Maurice Samuels, p. 155).

    “We will establish ourselves in Palestine whether you like it or not…You can hasten our arrival or you can equally retard it. It is however better for you to help us so as to avoid our constructive powers being turned into a destructive power which will overthrow the world.” (Chaim Weizmann, Published in “Judische Rundschau,” No. 4, 1920)

    “Every time we do something you tell me America will do this and will do that . . . I want to tell you something very clear: Don’t worry about American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it.” – Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon, October 3, 2001, to Shimon Peres, as reported on Kol Yisrael radio. (Certainly the FBI’s cover-up of the Israeli spy ring/phone tap scandal suggests that Mr. Sharon may not have been joking.)


  197. mr. ethoipan says:

    Executive Privilege will not help him afer he leaves office, if a crime has been commited then we can hold him accoutable in 2008 and then put him in jail.


  198. ace says:

    #

    Flaco,

    It is a good thing that he killed Islamists!!!

    too bad that he changed his mind, and too bad that he died.

    But it is still good that he killed Islamists!!!

    Comment by Mr. President — July 28, 2007 @ 6:13 pm

    Flaco = Mr. President – here caught talking to himself in one of his many identities.


  199. Flaco says:

    ace=pete the prophet :-)


  200. pete says:

    Preaching falsehoods makes them impotent.


  201. ace says:

    Aristocles son of Ariston = Flaco = Mr. President –

    caught talking to himself – enabled by Mossad’s Megaphone Blogging Software.


  202. pete says:

    Never laugh at a live dragon.


  203. ebbAndflow says:

    Brilliant Pete. The trolls appear to be in the dark – running into and over each other.
    Grand timing on your part – no direct roiling on what they say but your choice of phrases just seem to make them scatter and regroup and attempt to have a ‘conversation’ with each other~!~ Brilliant.


  204. Mr. President says:

    Flaco = Mr. President – here caught talking to himself in one of his many identities.

    Comment by ace — July 28, 2007 @ 6:17 pm

    CONSPIRACY!!!!

    ace, you are posting false information about Plato.

    You don’t want to post LIES, do you?

    Read “The Republic, Book V, 454 – 456″

    Plato says that men and women can both be “Philosopher-Rulers”
    Please change your information on any future posts.


  205. pete says:

    Rational stupidity and irrational wisdom are relatively harmless. Irrational stupidity is generally fatal.


  206. pete says:

    Comment by ebbAndflow — July 28, 2007 @ 6:21 pm

    Thank you.


  207. Flaco says:

    Just checkin’ the progressives progress on the new CONspiracy theory they are workin’ on here at TP for the Tillman was Murdered nut case.

    Guess who’s here with the links, documents, testimonies, and whatever else he can throw in?

    ace – conspiracy extrodinaire.


  208. pete says:

    Rage and relevance exist in an inverse proportion to each other.


  209. pete says:

    Never argue with a moron. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.


  210. Flaco says:

    Mossad Operative
    He said to call him MO.

    I’ve seen this dude at the mall just today.

    He was trying to sell my some crazy software he said would keep track of my stuff.


  211. pete says:

    We have nothing to fear but fearful idiots.


  212. pete says:

    The problem with making something idiot proof is that idiots are so ingenious.


  213. pete says:

    Well, It’s time to cook supper. Have fun.


  214. Flaco says:

    See pete 911 helped


  215. ace says:

    Autopsy: No Arabs on Flight 77
    By Thomas R. Olmsted, M.D

    http://www.sierratimes.com/03/07/02/article_tro.htm

    I am an ex Naval line officer and a psychiatrist in private practice in New Orleans, a Christian and homeschool dad. It troubled me a great deal that we rushed off to war on the flimsiest of evidence. I considered various ways to provide a smoking gun of who and why Sept 11th happened. Astute observers noticed right away that there were no Arabic sounding names on any of the flight manifests of the planes that “crashed” on that day.

    A list of names on a piece of paper is not evidence, but an autopsy by a pathologist, is. I undertook by FOIA request, to obtain that autopsy list and you are invited to view it below. Guess what? Still no Arabs on the list. It is my opinion that the monsters who planned this crime made a mistake by not including Arabic names on the original list to make the ruse seem more believable.

    When airline disasters occur, airlines will routinely provide a manifest list for anxious families. You may have noticed that even before Sep 11th, that airlines are pretty meticulous about getting an accurate headcount before takeoff. It seems very unlikely to me, that five Arabs sneaked onto a flight with weapons.


  216. Flaco says:

    Tillman was the mercenary!!! SCREW HIM!!!

    #207
    Comment by Flaco — July 28, 2007 @ 5:59 pm

    Hey, Flaco… just so ya know, I copied your comment off, in case TP deletes it. I’m going to spend a little time for the next few days, seeing if I can get in touch w/ the Tillman family and see how they feel about your words.

    Just so ya know, Li’l Buddy.

    Comment by The Republic of Stupidity
    ———————————————————————–

    Here is another copy to send.

    Thanks Pa!!!


  217. Flaco says:

    Pat Tillman was a good guy.

    I was just goofin’ on the moonbats here.

    Remember “KOS “Screw them” Markos?

    He is one of their heroes.


  218. Mr. NEOCON!!! says:

    Pat Tillman was a good guy.

    Remember “KOS “Screw them” Markos?

    Comment by Flaco — July 28, 2007 @ 6:37 pm
    —————————————
    I know, Flaco.

    What did, Kos, say?

    I didn’t hear about that.


  219. The Republic of Stupidity says:

    #

    Pat Tillman was a good guy.
    …
    Remember “KOS “Screw them” Markos?

    Comment by Flaco — July 28, 2007 @ 6:37 pm
    —————————————
    I know, Flaco.

    What did, Kos, say?

    I didn’t hear about that.

    Comment by Mr. NEOCON!!! — July 28, 2007 @ 6:39 pm

    Think I ‘ll make sure “wayne”, our resident Ranger, gets these too.

    Keep laughing it up, guys. You’re doing your side a world of good.



  220. Elisabeth Ham says:

    I heard the report on Countdown and there was no indication that anyone thought the president or anyone other than some soldiers at the site killed Tillman. There were questions about how much closer the shooter was than had been reported and that all three shots went to the head. The medical team examining him questioned how that could have happened and reportedly there had been no enemy fire. All of these facts are questionable and need further investigation but neither Keith nor anyone else suggested that the white house had anything to do with it. I wish people would stop jumping to conclusions and use their heads once in a while. This is exactly what spinning is all about….take a few words out of context and then blow it up till it becomes something else entirely.


  221. ebbAndflow says:

    Comment by The Republic of Stupidity — July 28, 2007 @ 6:18 pm
    “I’m going to spend a little time…seeing if I can get in touch w/ the Tillman family and see how they feel about your words.”

    TRoS: Bravo! this may help: Patrick Tillman, Sr. is an Attorney At Law in San Jose, CA. – (it’s in the whitepages(dot)com.)


  222. Moderation says:

    Elisabeth,

    If the White House didn’t want any flak coming down on them, they should not have invoked Executive Privilege. Invoking EP means the WH knows something they do not want the public knowing. Even if it was a fragging, WHY would the WH want to cover that up? If it is simply because they used the Tillman murder for political gain, whilst knowing it was friendly fire from 10 yards away with an M-16 or M-4, it is still beyond reprehensible.

    It is EP that the White House claimed that brought the spotlight on them. They brought ALL of the speculation of cover-up on themselves.


  223. The Republic of Stupidity says:

    I wish people would stop jumping to conclusions and use their heads once in a while. This is exactly what spinning is all about….take a few words out of context and then blow it up till it becomes something else entirely.

    Comment by Elisabeth Ham

    You’re right about what you’re saying, Elisabeth, and the Bush Admin did know the truth about Tillman’s death right from the start and covered it up, all the while using Tillman to continue selling this hideous misadventure in South Asia. They also apparetnly tried to stop any investigations, right up to having the “President” claim EP around the case.

    The “known” facts are hideous and the longer the Admin refuses to come clean w/ what they know and why they did what they did, including lying to the Tillman family, the worst the stink around this is going to get. What a few posters at TP say isn’t going to push this thing one way or the other. Again, it’s become a runaway train.


  224. The Republic of Stupidity says:

    TRoS: Bravo! this may help: Patrick Tillman, Sr. is an Attorney At Law in San Jose, CA. – (it’s in the whitepages(dot)com.)

    Comment by ebbAndflow — July 28, 2007 @ 7:30 pm

    Thanks, ebbAndflow. I’m on it.


  225. jack moss says:

    You’re all wrong. Killing people for political reasons was a Clinton MO.


  226. Mr. NEOCON!!! says:

    Think I ‘ll make sure “wayne”, our resident Ranger, gets these too.

    Keep laughing it up, guys. You’re doing your side a world of good.

    Comment by The Republic of Stupidity — July 28, 2007 @ 6:58 pm
    ————
    okay.

    Might I ask…

    why did you put wayne’s name in quotes?

    Just askin’…


  227. The Republic of Stupidity says:

    Just askin’…

    Comment by Mr. NEOCON!!! — July

    So people wouldn’t get wayne confused w/ Wayne Schneider.


  228. The Republic of Stupidity says:

    You’re all wrong. Killing people for political reasons was a Clinton MO.

    Comment by jack moss — July 28, 2007 @ 7:41 pm

    And yet another glue huffer kicks in his 2 cents…


  229. Expat says:

    In Germany circa 1930’s-40’s there was what was called “working toward the Fuhrer.” That meant that people in the bureacracy, military, and the civilian population where encouraged to act on their own to move forward the policies of the Nazi party and Hitler. They didn’t have to receive direct orders but where encouraged to take the initiative. Could this be what we are seeing with the Tillman tragedy? Perhaps there wasn’t a direct order to silence Corporal Tillman but perhaps someone took on their own initiative to “work toware the Leader.”


  230. MapleStreet says:

    To those who say the WH owes the Tillman family the facts:

    The WH has lied so many times about this and been caught in its lies, I don’t see where anything the WH says about this incidence could possibly have any credibility. After all, the next statement they say about this tragedy – how do we know that it just isn’t some other politically motivated lie.

    Likewise for what the Military has said.

    In short, its to the place that some independent body is needed to investigate.


  231. The Republic of Stupidity says:

    In short, its to the place that some independent body is needed to investigate.

    Comment by MapleStreet — July 28, 2007 @ 8:20 pm

    When people say the WH owes the Tillmans an explanation, I suspect they’re saying, “IF the WH had a conscience…”

    I agree. Independent body.


  232. Jackie says:

    The doctors report proves Pat Tillman was murdered. Now there are Bush supporters who want Pat to wake up and say he was killed or they wont believe it. Bush has lied from day one and Americans just keep following the liar. Pat was shoot 10 yards and was hit with 2 bullets to the front of his head. Now for all those who don’t understand check out a Mafia movie. Pat was out spoken about the lies Bush told because he saw the truth while in Afghanistan. Pat was telling fellow soldiers he was voting for John Kerry. This was a danger to the President and his mission. Yes a famous person like Pat would make people listen. The White House wanted his silenced for good. Remember how close the race was and Pat could make a difference. The top of the Military and the White House wanted the problem to go away as not to mess up the mission of crimes they needed to continue with. McCain played his part as he was representing Arizona and the Tillman Family went to him to get answers. McCain did what any GOP would do he lied for the White House. Many more soldiers have been killed by fellow soldiers and those crimes will never come to light until those who committed the crimes have to answer to God. The White House could care less and the American people are to busy getting ready for American Idol.


  233. che says:

    this is the story that can dislodge queen george awol bone smuggler


  234. BARTLEBEE says:

    :|

    Its like asking Al Capone to investigate Frank Nitti.


  235. Henry Holland says:

    Would you shut your [expletive] mouth? God’s not going to help you; you need to do something for yourself, you sniveling –

    So much for the lie that there’s no atheists in foxholes….


  236. eddiejoe says:

    I hate to remind people that this story came and went in the MSM a couple of days ago (except for Keith). The story must be kept alive. Waxman resumes the Tillman congressional hearing on Wednesday. Think Rummie will show? Call your congressman and express your outrage.


  237. sabianq says:

    all of you guys are nuts, He was Accidentally shot 3 time in the forehead from 10 yards. how could this not be friendly fire?

    you guys are so stupid.


  238. Flaco says:

    are you FREAKIN SERIOUS!?!!?!!?!?!?!?!?

    killed for political reasons???? wooow you guys need to lay off the tinfoil hat stuff. looooonatics.

    Comment by Ernesto
    ———————————————

    Oye Ernesto

    TPers estan locos en los cabezas? Si mucho.


  239. Flaco says:

    The ace is a conspiracy theroy breeder.
    Republic of Stupidity is his momma. They are going at it like mad now with Stupidity bent over takin’ it from ace.


  240. Kevin says:

    Hey Flaco or whatever you name is.
    Just received an email that mad me me very angry.
    Grow up and be a man. Leave my brother alone.
    You know nothing about war or what went on.
    We fought together to protect you so give it a rest.

    Just so ya know, Li’l Buddy.
    Thanks to The Republic of Stupidity


  241. Mr. President says:

    Nice work in here, Flaco!!!!

    Keep it up, your country needs you!


  242. Ethereal Merc says:

    HELLO! How can anyone question whether or not the white leaders care about the soldiers? Of course, they don’t or the soliders wouldn’t be in a hell hole for no good reason. Unless you consider greed a good reason.

    We as Americans have no idea if he was killed to silence him. And, likeily we never will.


  243. liberals destroyed america says:

    it is these very conspiracy theories that noam chomsky rails against as being completely absurd. this, to the ‘controled demolition’ , liberal icon chomsky says is all ridiculous.


  244. dusty foggo says:

    bush is claiming exec priv to cover up his lie, since he knew Tillman was killed by one of his own before he gave his speech. a speech used to promote more violence in tghe name of corporate greed


  245. Kilo says:

    bush is claiming exec priv to cover up his lie, since he knew Tillman was killed by one of his own before he gave his speech.

    Comment by dusty foggo — July 29, 2007 @ 2:29 am

    His speech where he made no reference to the circumstances of Tillman’s death.
    So his lie would be…….. ?


  246. Kilo says:

    So, why the cover up! Why the claim of Executive Privilege?

    Comment by Marcus Aruelius — July 28, 2007 @ 2:10 pm

    ThinkProgress… your questions answered inadvertently within 1 minute or your money back….

    One more “executive privilege” claim by Bush which trumps common decency!
    Comment by veritas — July 28, 2007 @ 2:11 pm

    Yes, why would the WH claim executive privilege in response to a senate request for WH records that they don’t need to, which comes amid senate request for WH records that they really, really need to ?
    What a puzzle.

    I guess the only answer is that the WH had him killed. Because every other explanation would be way too fkn obvious.


  247. hz says:

    Picture this…

    A dewey eyed WH staffer (no doubt a recent Regent University grad) giving a powerpoint presentation about the political value of “Heros”… Everyone loves Heros (Slide of Reagan) but people really worship dead Heros (Slide of Jesus), so if an opportunity should arise wherein a live Hero (slide of Tillman in NFL uniform) somehow should suddenly become a dead Hero (slide of Tillman in Army uniform) the American Public can be further convinced to continue their Iraq War support. Next slide asks, “Is there more political advantage to having dead Heros or having dead enemies to garner continued public support for endless war?” Last slide says, “Remember- Support our troops, God Bless America and Hire more Regent University Grads”.

    Shortly thereafter, a priority message is relayed to the killing field from a WH political office to make sure support for W’s Iraq War is assured as patriotic speeches about America’s New, just confirmed, dead Hero, combined with Iraq War talking points are rolling off the presses to the usual suspects; GOP faithful, right wing radio hosts and Faux News TV talking heads.


  248. Deadeye Dick Cheney says:

    As they say over at CorrenteWire.com, send your responses to the department of “NO! They would never do THAT!”

    I believe that a pattern has been established within this administration that no matter how astounding the charges that are leveled against them, they always turn out to have done something even more despicable than previously contemplated or even imagined. From Abu Ghraib to renditions to Katrina to wireless wiretapping, they never fail to meet even the lowest standards of decency, let alone Americanism.


  249. Kilo says:

    From Abu Ghraib to renditions to Katrina to wireless wiretapping, they never fail to meet even the lowest standards of decency, let alone Americanism.

    Comment by Deadeye Dick Cheney — July 29, 2007 @ 8:36 am

    Yes… how dare they wiretap my cordless drill!!
    Seriously, you’re worried about “wireless wiretapping”? Why ? Use a landline then.


  250. MikeTheLiberal says:

    Yeah, I agree with Comment #1 by Kevin. People can dissent in the Army, as long as they follow the Chain of Command. Unlikely someone ordered him killed. I really think it was just a bungled cover-up.


  251. frank zen says:

    tillman was murdered. cheney ordered, GWB compliant, GHW bush high level puppet master.
    why can’t choamsky see BUILDING 7?


  252. canardtahiti says:

    Question/

    Where is Pat Tillman’s head?


  253. canardtahiti says:

    Question:

    Was Tillman’s head burned along with his flack jacket and diary?


  254. canardtahiti says:

    Question:

    Was Tillman’s head “disappeared” like JKF’s brain was “disappeared?”


  255. canardtahiti says:

    Question:

    Earliest reports stated that Tillman’s had was “blown away” by massive “friendly fire. Was this lie designed to explain the “disappeared” head?


  256. canardtahiti says:

    Question:

    If Tillman’s head is missing, did it go missing before or after those army doctors demanded a homicide investigation?


  257. Annie B. says:

    The comment that Mr. Tillman supposedly made before he died is bogus! When someone is shot in the head three times at close range, he is not able to say anything!

    What kind of cold, calculating piece of **** would put such words in a dead man’s mouth? And what kind of a news service would be stupid enough to print it?

    RIP, Mr. Tillman.


  258. proxywar says:

    I would side with skeptics of the conspiracy theory about Pat Tillman being rubbed out on White House orders. It makes the opposition look a bit loopy or desperate.

    It’s true that Bush-Cheney-Rove et al. are above nothing, morally, but they are shrewd. (OK, collectively shrewd, even if certain members of the gang are C-student dimwits.) Rubbing out Tillman would be a high-risk operation for dubious gain. The right-wing propaganda machine is so powerful and successful, they probably feel insulted at the suggestion that they needed to fear Mr. Tillman. Recall that John Kerry, the only candidate of his generation to actually fight in Vietnam while all the others dodged service through connections or deferments, was easily swift-booted, while Bush and Cheney retained their position as the manly warriors.

    It’s not at all surprising that they were eager to cover up the friendly-fire aspect of the death, however. It’s a perfect metaphor for what has happened to America in this terror war / Iraq war / whatever next Israeli proxy war disaster. America was suckered in on false pretenses, plus an appeal to naive patriotism, and then our brains were blown out by “friendly” fire.


  259. simon lomax says:

    The guy was clearly murdered by somebody who was given an order that come from up on high. You guys still think this was a democrat conspiracy to bring down the whitehouse. How many times do they need to lie and decieve you before you realise that the two parties are there to represent interests other than those of the american people and the constitution.


  260. LoisAnn says:

    Un-canny! The Spirit of America has been stolen by the SOUL-LESS worshipers of Satan! Yes! This is exactly what happened. It was obvious to those paying attention when these evil worshipers invoked the name of “God”…..Aways beware of those who use this deity in order to gain trust. If they were trustworthy they could stand on their own credentials.
    Our planet has been ruled for centuries by a bloodline which is of the satanic genes. This lineage actually believes they have RIGHTS to impoverish, enslave and destroy ‘we who are their ‘lessers’ ‘
    With all their worldly ‘gains’ there is one thing they hunger for and that is a SOUL! It cannot be purchased as it is a Divine Right…something they lack in their lineage. They have no conscience, as they are empty vessels without emotion. They are also being deceived and are lost in this awareness, as they are merely the puppets of Absolute Evil. It is impossible for them to feel….they only live off others’ miseries. Oh, such emptiness they exist from. It is for those who are aware to break the strings of the puppet-master and eliminate the ties which binds the mass population . Only then will our Souls connect and our Spirits soar to boundless limits of love and peace.


  261. DH says:

    To the moderator,
    I am a gay man, and I believe that Pat Tillman was gay and that was why he was murdered. Is there something offensive about that, that my comment was removed?
    DH


  262. Robert M. says:

    Whatever the truth may be, it is clear the Army and the White House had a hand in covering up the actual events. This is a crime, and this matter needs to be pursued as such by a Congressional investigation.

    As a criminal investigation, the privilege of “Executive Privilege” does not apply, and the White House needs to make available all pertinent records to Congress. Whether they comply or not, the charge remains the same: Obstruction of Justice.


  263. paul kwiatkowski says:

    bush and his international elite buddies not only murdered tillman and others for politics and money but they with bushes knowing, murdered their own citizens and continue to do so.

    911 was an inside job and it will go down in history as so.

    bush and his buddies will pay very shortly for their crimes against humanity.

    after all regardless of what the spindoctors and lunatics say it is up to WE THE PEOPLE and our international brothers and sisters in SOLIDARITY to remove those who do not GOVERN transparently in love for the good of all…..

    http://www.wiolawapress.com


  264. Fallen says:

    I was wondering how long it was going to take the “911 was an inside job” whackadoodles to come out and play. Yeesh.


  265. Silas says:

    A few questions/comments:

    1) news reports have Pat waving his arms and yelling his name just before he died. Sad that he probably helped the murderer by identifying himself.

    2) there was another man by his side when he died. This man must know how and by whom Pat was killed. Is there any way congress can get this guy to testify?

    3) the accuracy and grouping of the fatal shots may be indicative of a sniper. Does the ammo used rule this out?

    4) a previous poster speculated that the 3 shots could have been from a burst of automatic fire. Are there any military experts who could support/refute this theory?


  266. Synak says:

    I was wondering how long it was going to take the “911 was an inside job” whackadoodles to come out and play. Yeesh.

    Comment by Fallen — July 30, 2007 @ 6:35 pm

    Backwards really, for it is the trolls who come out and play when ‘911′ is mentioned.


  267. noam chomsky says:

    get a clue ppl. And to those who think they have critical thinking abilities should be the first to volunteer their life for a lie. No weopons of mass destruction….some say …..and even IF there were such weapons
    you can bet they where supplied by THE U.S. . And by the way – Tin foil hats only increase the signal strength of microwaves within the hat itself so those ppl again who make such comments obviously don’t have critical thinking in the brain either. Do the Science! Want to be part of the sheeple believe your king george but it’s been histories history that doesn’t take to kind to diciders who rule through deceit and “Executive Privilege”. Noam


  268. noam chomsky says:

    And get over the misspelled words. idiot!!!
    noam


  269. Fallen says:

    “Backwards really, for it is the trolls who come out and play when ‘911′ is mentioned.”

    I guess you missed the post where someone included a comment that “911 was an inside job”; it is that to which I was responding. :)


  270. Angryman says:

    Oh c’mon. Of course the Bush administration marked Tillman for death. Do you honestly think it was some long gunman with vehement political views that did this? You probably think Lee Harvey Oswald was the only conspirator in the JFK assassination too then, don’t ya. Well if you believe that, I’ve got a bridge I wanna sell ya.


  271. legalpad says:

    the clinching fact: they BURNED HIS UNIFORM and made his personal diary disappear. had this been accidental, those who shot him would have made damn sure that the uniform were preserved as exculpatory evidence. and, the diary would have been treated as sacrosanct and hand-delivered to the grieving family as pat’s last remembrances. that the preservation of the uniform and diary did NOT happen tells you all you need to know about whether this was or was not an intentional killing.

    what adds to the revulsion is that the military then concocted a story which this white house spun to create what one officer called “a recruiting bonanza”. wrap your mind around how diabolical that is. all brought to you by the same people who brought you 9/11 as an inside job.

    anyone who can’t see that by now just hasn’t been paying attention.


  272. fitzbr says:

    I totally agree with the observation made by Annie B. about those alleged last words from Tillman, the source being an unnamed Chaplain (name blacked out) stating that the story came from Spc. Bryan O’Neal, the man at Tillman’s side when he was killed.
    O’Neal completely denies this story stating that Tillman would never talk to him that way. Just take a moment to think about those words and the negative implications they were intended to convey in reference to Mr. Tillman’s alleged atheism. Then think about the crude and obviously intolerant comments made by Lt. Col. Ralph Kauzlarich as to the belief that Tillman and his family were “atheist” and have nothing left to believe in but a son who is now “worm dirt”. Nice Christians (?) these folks are!

    Given O’Neal denial of those last words from Tillman and the fanaticism of some of the self righteous fundamentalist and their intolerance of other people’s beliefs, it seems completely obvious to me that his “last words” were contrived by them which implies an attempt to cover-up and justify what happened to this fine heroic man.

    He reportedly was agnostic and had made quite a study of world religions showing remarkable intellectual curiosity and a quest for spiritual answers. His family seems well educated, articulate and most likely with fine moral and ethical convictions. May the truth come out! I also agree with proxywar’s view that if murder was indeed the situation, then it most likely was done by some around him as a fragging. It seems unlikely that such a risk would be ordered from Washington. Mr. Tillman’s teaming up with Noam Chomsky would not please them, but would not have been a threat they could not have handled given assets like “The Mighty Wurlitzer” as their massive propaganda machine is sometimes called.



Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2009 Center for American Progress Action Fund
View Most Popular

Advertisement

What We're About

Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report



imageTopic Cloud


Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
Reports


Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll