Think Progress

No attack on Iran ‘this year.’

By Faiz Shakir on Jul 30th, 2007 at 3:14 pm

No attack on Iran ‘this year.’

“A well-informed source tells United Press International that according to senior U.S. intelligence officials, President Bush has definitely decided not to strike any of Iran’s alleged nuclear weapons production facilities this year. The sources say the officials stressed the words ‘this year,’ meaning in 2007. That, however, does not rule out the possibility of military intervention in 2008, right until January 2009, when Bush’s term in the White House comes to an end.”



46 Responses to “No attack on Iran ‘this year.’”

  1. Princess Sparkle Pony says:

    So maybe the Bush administration will bomb Iran in November as the ultimate revenge for all those supposed pranks the Clintonites played upon exiting the White House: the missing Ws off the typewriters, etc?


  2. TripMaster Monkey says:

    So, now we’re supposed to breathe easier?

    This administration hasn’t told the truth yet…exactly why should we start trusting what they say now?


  3. Kay says:

    Yah, but will the neoCONS fulfill another wet dream by attacking their own country?


  4. bilbobaggins says:

    I think that Bush will be well on the way towards impeachment in 2008 so perhaps the middle east is not going to be blown up after all.


  5. Zimzone says:

    Alberto released this to the press, so it must be true!


  6. Zooey says:

    Well, that’s a relief.
    /sarcasm


  7. Brassmask from 3DHS says:

    We shouldn’t take any options off the table.


  8. JPV says:

    I think that Bush will be well on the way towards impeachment in 2008 so perhaps the middle east is not going to be blown up after all.

    Comment by bilbobaggins

    HUH? Impeachment will give him the perfect excuse to bomb Iran, as a distraction. Why do you think that Pelosi said that it was “off the table”?

    IDIOT!


  9. Brassmask from 3DHS says:

    I think that Bush will be well on the way towards impeachment in 2008 so perhaps the middle east is not going to be blown up after all.

    Comment by bilbobaggins

    You don’t have the votes for impeachment.


  10. katy says:

    Bush has definitely decided not to strike

    so, there it is…
    dumby will definitely strike iran…
    at the optimal time, of course…


  11. Lil' Bush says:

    Well since everything that these people says turns out to be the opposite of the truth, I wouldn’t rule out that they’re lying and that we are indeed going to strike Iran this year.


  12. Brassmask from 3DHS says:

    dumby will definitely strike iran…
    at the optimal time, of course…
    …

    Comment by katy

    We should bomb their nucluer facilities.


  13. Art says:

    Why should I believe this?


  14. Zimzone says:

    We should bomb their nucluer facilities.
    -Comment by Brassmask from 3DHS

    And you should learn to spell, Trollsucker


  15. TripMaster Monkey says:

    Brassmask sez:

    We should bomb their nucluer [SIC] facilities.

    OK…we’ll get right on that…just as soon as you provide evidence of their existence.


  16. Tobey Tall says:

    CONGRESS SHOULD PASS A BILL – stating Iran cannot be attacked without talking to them first – as this is lunacy

    preferably a bill that bans Bush from starting wars without congressional permission


  17. Tobey Tall says:

    heres a great read from the independent today

    Stage-managed nuclear tour reveals why Iran won’t be the first to blink

    http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article2816667.ece


  18. Zimzone says:

    CONGRESS SHOULD PASS A BILL – stating Iran cannot be attacked without talking to them first – as this is lunacy -Tobey Tall

    I would support a bill that bans W from talking.

    Or Cheney.

    Or Boner.

    Or Sphinctor.

    Or Scalia.

    Or Alberto.

    Or {insert favorite Conservaturd here}


  19. Hrr says:

    Yeah Bush might not think about striking this year, doesn’t mean Cheney isn’t and won’t.


  20. Cynicon Implant says:

    “the bombing will begin in five minutes”

    who said that?


  21. Tobey Tall says:

    why is Bush not attacking till next year are they dissarming like Iraq did ???

    surely your not going to attack a country that has an army , airforce and a navy without talking first

    hey thats lunacy – Oh Well – learn the hard way


  22. DreamCrusher says:

    Gee, where have I heard this crap before? Oh, in 2003. And 2004. And 2005. And 2006. Now I’ve heard it a few times already in 2007. Yet each year keeps passing by, no attack on Iran.

    Think Progress has been there, though, consistently whipping the Base into a frenzy with their false propaganda. THat’s all it’s for. They know Bush isn’t going to attack. They need something to make the liberals get scared and pissed about.

    Ah, I remember when they were saying right before the 2006 election that you had to elect Democrats or else we’d be going into Iran too. Those were the days. Good times.


  23. veritas says:

    This will certainly put the last nail in the coffin of McCain’s tanked campaign. Now he’s lost his campaign slogan and tune!


  24. veritas says:

    DreamCrusher: I don’t think so. Even fear mongering, regardless of who’s attempting to jerk people’s chains with it, isn’t going to work this time – regardless of the consequences. We’ve now moved into a true “cry wolf” syndrome and no one gives a rat’s ass any more when our government officials are lawbreakers themselves.


  25. timeisart says:

    Or perhaps Bush has an unspoken agreement with Pelosi that if impeachment remains off the table, bombs will not rain on Iran. Hopefully, nothing will stop impeachment.

    In any event, Bush’s illegal and ill-begotten 8-year squat in the White House will be likened to a horrible, lethal frat boy prank that spewed hate and death and ignorance and intolerance and destruction and fascism and racism and elitism and…we must remember, the worst could be yet to come.


  26. veritas says:

    timeisart: Bush, the Horrendous will eclipse Haggar, the Horrible and Ivan, the Terrible – and all other despots in history.


  27. Tobey Tall says:

    The Esfahan facility in central Iran, functioning under complete United Nations scrutiny,

    why should Iran stop processing ,,, It did for 3 years already ( 2002 to 05 )


  28. bush jr. says:

    OK…we’ll get right on that…just as soon as you provide evidence of their existence.

    Comment by TripMaster Monkey — July 30, 2007 @ 3:27 pm

    We didn’t need no stinkin’ proof to go into Iraq! I do whatever I want, and no little americans or stupid congress or some silly constitution can stop me.

    PS. Nanny-nanny, boo-boo.


  29. veritas says:

    http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/07/30/us-set-to-offer-huge-arms-deal-to-saudi-arabia/#comments

    So here we go again on our hypocritical march! This should be more troubling than Iran right now.


  30. Cynicon Implant says:

    When is Bush going to insist that Iran release the U.S. hostages they are holding?


  31. Tobey Tall says:

    If Bush attacks and releases any Nuclear waste that lands anywhere near an ICC member then the whole of Congress is repsonsible and all WILL be arrested on any ICC members soil

    Congress’ Liability in a
    Nuclear Strike on Iran
    No more European vacations for our legislators?

    http://www.antiwar.com/orig/hirsch.php?articleid=10544


  32. Zimzone says:

    When is Bush going to insist that Iran release the U.S. hostages they are holding? -Comment by Cynicon Implant

    He won’t. Remember, he’s a chickenshithawk. They don’t fly, they don’t fight, they don’t plan, they just drop lots of turds for people to talk about.


  33. Tobey Tall says:

    Furthermore, radioactive fallout from a U.S. nuclear strike against Iran that spreads and kills citizens of an ICC State Party would make U.S. citizens involved in such action subject to the Court’s jurisdiction. Afghanistan, Tajikistan, Georgia, Cyprus and Jordan are State Parties to the ICC and not far from Iran. According to the Union of Concerned Scientists, a nuclear earth penetrator “would produce massive amounts of radioactive fallout and potentially kill millions of civilians” spreading “more than a thousand miles.”


  34. IgnoranceIsNotBliss says:

    So, when is he planning on doing it? January 1, 2008? Happy New YEar everyone!!!!!! oh, and by trhe way, BOOM.


  35. Tobey Tall says:

    UN inspects Iranian nuclear reactor TODAY

    http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/1BB10840-B1EE-4DB1-86BF-02E7C58FEA1F.htm

    Inspectors from the IAEA have visited a heavy water reactor in Iran, examining a key component of the country’s nuclear programme.

    The five-hour inspection on Monday was the first since April, when Iran blocked access to the research reactor outside the central town of Arak, 200km south of Tehran.

    Iran will then hold a third round of talks with IAEA officials in Tehran on August 20, he said.

    The UN Security Council has repeatedly called on Iran to freeze its uranium enrichment and halt construction of the Arak reactor.


  36. The Republic of Stupidity says:

    Yeah, in Bush-talk, that means it’s a done deal.


  37. Keith H. says:

    Upcoming Headline:

    Bush & Cheney declare war on the United States !


  38. Egreggious says:

    Upcoming Headline:

    Bush & Cheney declare war on the United States !

    Comment by Keith H. — July 30, 2007 @ 4:24 pm

    Aw, that’s old news. :)


  39. bush jr. says:

    Upcoming Headline:

    Bush & Cheney declare war on the United States !

    Comment by Keith H. — July 30, 2007 @ 4:24 pm

    That’s not until after we’ve defeated Al Qaeda in Canada and bring democracy to the French people.


  40. Rogera says:

    Hey, it’s UPI!

    “A well-informed source …”

    “…according to senior U.S. intelligence officials…”

    This is from the Moonies!

    There is no information in this article. It is just noise.


  41. Ret. Col. Jack Ripper says:

    I think, for an exemplary demonstration of the definition of “cluelessness” would be the angry scolding we get from Bush supporter “DreamCrusher.”

    Yes, Dreamcrusher, it’s just so silly to even think for a moment that a man like Bush would ever rush into a war with another country. Oh why do we silly moonbats fill their heads with such nonsense?


  42. margaret says:

    When is Bush going to insist that Iran release the U.S. hostages they are holding?

    Comment by Cynicon Implant — July 30, 2007 @ 3:55 pm

    When is Bush going to release those 5 Iranian diplomats who have been held since January? I see that they just had their first visitors on July 8th.

    http://hrw.org/english/docs/2007/07/17/iraq16396.htm


  43. Badger says:

    US officials sat down with the Iranians, for the first time since 1980. Absent from any Iranian comments was an Insistence for the US to leave Iraq. Now this statement from Bush. Someone with a brain is talking to Iranians….Iran knows we are going to drastically redeploy out of Iraq….Bases are getting ready in Kuwait and other
    Gulf states. Someone has obviously got thru to Bush…that our only hope is a Diplomatic Solution. Look for a hostage deal soon…I hope.


  44. Bonnie says:

    Of course, it won’t happen this year. Next year is the election; that makes more sense to start a big f—ing war just before an election. Duh………


  45. Marie says:

    Things are pretty cynical in this country of Bush’s reign when we have all come to know that we must take each word of their sentences and parse them for alternate meanings. They lie every time they speak, so they carefully choose their words, memorize them, and carefully avoid outright lies that can be easily proven. So when they say “this year” we have learned to expect that in six months, there will be a new phrase.
    I hate what Bush&Co have done to us, our ideals, our pride and our country.


  46. DreamCrusher says:

    Jack Ripper,

    I think, for an exemplary demonstration of the definition of “cluelessness” would be the angry scolding we get from Bush supporter “DreamCrusher.”

    First of all, why do you assume I support Bush just because I don’t chow down on anti-Bush propaganda like an idiot? I think “cluelessness” is boldly defined by people who believe the same lie year after year after year because they’ve invested in an image of Bush as a rogue, war-mongering emperor. You’ve been had! Get a friggin clue.

    Yes, Dreamcrusher, it’s just so silly to even think for a moment that a man like Bush would ever rush into a war with another country. Oh why do we silly moonbats fill their heads with such nonsense?

    So if there was “news” tomorrow that Bush was going to invade, say, China, you would believe that too? Because you believe Bush is that crazy?

    When do facts start to matter more than your biased perceptions of people you don’t even know?

    You do realize that you are no different than a Christian fundamentalist, right? Believing the gospel instead of deducing from logic and common sense? You’ve joined a cult and you don’t even realize it.



Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2009 Center for American Progress Action Fund
View Most Popular

Advertisement

What We're About

Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report



imageTopic Cloud


Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
Reports


Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll