Home Depot dumps O’Reilly.
By on Jul 31st, 2007 at 2:10 pm
Home Depot dumps O’Reilly.
AMERICAblog reports that Home Depot has promised to no longer advertise on Bill O’Reilly’s website, after strong pressure for the company to drop its sponsorship. Fox Attacks releases a new film mocking Fox’s global warming denial. Watch it:
Keep the heat on by taking action here.
View Most Popular
Advertisement
What We're About
What We're Fighting For
What We're Fighting Against
Featured
Subscribe to the Progress Report
Topic CloudView topics sorted by popularity
Bachmann
Beck
Boehner
Bush
Bush Legacy
Cheney
Civil Rights
Congress
DADT
Economy
Energy
Environment
Ethics
Fox News
Franken
Global Warming
Guantanamo
Health Care
International Relations
Iran
Iraq
Justice
Krauthammer
Kyl
LGBT
Limbaugh
McCain
Media
Military
O'Reilly
Obama
Palin
Public Plan
Race
Radical Right
Rove
Sanford
Sotomayor
Steele
Supreme Court
Terrorism
ThinkProgress
Tiller
Torture
Women's Rights
Visit Our Affiliated Sites
Reports
In-depth studies on select topics
Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.
ArchivesBlog Roll
By the time this is over, O'reilly will be hiding under his desk, rolle-up in the fetal position, crying for his loofah.
July 31st, 2007 at 2:12 pmHey Bill O, whatcha got to say about the power of the people?
Need a tissue?
July 31st, 2007 at 2:14 pmYou people have better propoganda than Lenin.
July 31st, 2007 at 2:14 pmBill, oh, Bill. Where did you go wrong, buddy?
July 31st, 2007 at 2:14 pmYou people have better propoganda than Lenin.
Comment by enough already — July 31, 2007 @ 2:14 pm
Thanks!
July 31st, 2007 at 2:15 pm"I am a firm believer in the people. If given the truth, they can be depended upon to meet any national crises. The great point is to bring them the real facts."
ABRAHAM LINCOLN
Keep the pressure on Bill-o and FAUX NEWs' advertisers!
July 31st, 2007 at 2:19 pmAiding and abetting this treasonous administration emboldens the enemy!
Well I'm shopping at HOME DEPOT!
I always need stuff, but since they're willing to dump O'Lielly, I think I'll go buy some stuff I don't need!
Just for the hell of it.
BAWAHAAHHAHHAHAHHAHHAAHAHAHA HOME DEPOT HERE I COME!
July 31st, 2007 at 2:20 pmHome Depot is no longer sponsoring a "tool"?? That's got to hurt, Bill. What say you? .... Oh, never mind, I don't care what you have to say.
July 31st, 2007 at 2:20 pmAh the free market!!! How's that feel Bill?
Kos does not propagate hate. Unless you equate hate with the truth!!
July 31st, 2007 at 2:20 pmthe Market is a beeatch, biley...
July 31st, 2007 at 2:21 pmI think Bill should move to France! Actually the French are TOO good for Bill. How about a villa in Croatia? The French have great trains, why, if they are so bad, do they have great trains, Bill?
July 31st, 2007 at 2:22 pmliberals are all for free speech has long has the agree with whats being said.
censorship rules!!!!!
July 31st, 2007 at 2:22 pmHeck, I'm stopping at Home Depot on the way home, just because. I support businesses that do not support conservative causes!
July 31st, 2007 at 2:24 pmY'all trolls got nothin'. Go cry to your mommies.
July 31st, 2007 at 2:24 pmliberals are all for free speech has long has the agree with whats being said.
censorship rules!!!!!
Comment by crimedog — July 31, 2007 @ 2:22 pm
And the right of companies to make their own decisions about where they want to spend their advertising dollars!
July 31st, 2007 at 2:25 pmStalinism at work.
July 31st, 2007 at 2:26 pmOK we're gonna go after sponsors of Keith Olbermann!
Let's see how you like that!
The cool thing is Home Depot has such cool stuff.
I can now go buy fun stuff, like a florescent work lamp on a chrome tripod, or a bosch hammer drill, and be patriotic at the same time.
:D
July 31st, 2007 at 2:27 pmI clicked on the links but saw no list of O'Lielly's advertisers.
Can someone help?
July 31st, 2007 at 2:27 pmAre you gonna cry when we go after Olbermann's sponsor?
July 31st, 2007 at 2:28 pmHmmm?
FNC is still number.BOR is still the most watch show on cable news.
Your losing the battle, Liberal censorship will be defeated
July 31st, 2007 at 2:28 pmStalinism at work.
OK we’re gonna go after sponsors of Keith Olbermann!
Let’s see how you like that!
Comment by Voltron — July 31, 2007 @ 2:26 pm
Go ahead. I hate advertising anyway. I think we need a new model for broadcasting.
July 31st, 2007 at 2:29 pmStalinism at work.
OK we’re gonna go after sponsors of Keith Olbermann!
Let’s see how you like that!
Comment by Voltron
nobody watchs Olby so it wouldn't matter much
July 31st, 2007 at 2:30 pmI liked when Stalin wrote a bunch of letters to the sponsor of the "Down With Stalin" show until they finally caved.
JetBlue, anyone?
July 31st, 2007 at 2:30 pmI haven't really forgiven Home Depot for the sub-contractors' scandal.
Think I'd rather stick with Lowe's, who BTW dropped their advertising first.
JMO
July 31st, 2007 at 2:31 pmDoes anyone know Keith Olbermann's sponsors?
July 31st, 2007 at 2:32 pmStalinism at work.
OK we’re gonna go after sponsors of Keith Olbermann!
Let’s see how you like that!
Comment by Voltron
UHHHHHH, I think all the sponsors of Keith O already know his audience demographics, so nothing will change.
Faux NoNooz will soon be called Fox Opinion Network.
July 31st, 2007 at 2:32 pmStalinism at work.
OK we’re gonna go after sponsors of Keith Olbermann!
Let’s see how you like that!
Comment by Voltron — July 31, 2007 @ 2:26 pm
There's nothing Stalinist about the free market deciding where it's profitable to advertise based on popular opinion. That's what's known as "capitalism" and "democracy."
Why do you hate capitalism and democracy so much?
July 31st, 2007 at 2:33 pmtoasterhead - why do you and liberals hate free speech?
July 31st, 2007 at 2:37 pmtoaster, yeah, it's like they don't get what sponsorship is all about.
July 31st, 2007 at 2:37 pmMaybe they'd like to tell Nike that their pulling Vick products is Stalinist???
upside00,
Ok so we're gonna go after Olbermann's sponsors!
Hey by the way if Fox is opinion, then MSNBC is Leftisty Propaganda!
July 31st, 2007 at 2:40 pmOh look.
Its Voltron.
The not a troll right wing friendly trucker, who just happened to pop up in yet ANOTHER liberal blog.
But you're not a troll, right Doltron?
July 31st, 2007 at 2:40 pmcrimedog,
"liberals are all for free speech has long has the agree with whats being said. censorship rules!!!!!"
YOU ARE AN IDIOT!!! Bill O started this little spat by trying to get JetBlue not to 'sponsor' the yealrykos convention. So it's ok with you if Bill and the rest of you right wing whackos play by these rules, but if those on the left do it, you call it censorship? Get real!
July 31st, 2007 at 2:40 pmcrimedog,
Why does Bill O'Reillly hate free speech?
July 31st, 2007 at 2:41 pmtoasterhead - why do you and liberals hate free speech?
Comment by crimedog — July 31, 2007 @ 2:37 pm
Bill can find himself some new sponsors. What's the big deal?
July 31st, 2007 at 2:41 pmHey by the way if Fox is opinion, then MSNBC is Leftisty Propaganda!
Comment by Voltron — July 31, 2007 @ 2:40 pm
I'm watching MSNBC then!
July 31st, 2007 at 2:42 pmcrimedog-
No problem with free speech as long as they label themselves as the propaganda machine for the corrupt right that they are! News is supposed to be about facts not opinion.
"free and balanced" describes Chimpie's diet more than it does this joke of a network and their lap dog Bill-o.
July 31st, 2007 at 2:43 pmI'm sure you didn't mind when BOR unjustifiably went after JetBlue.
Wingnuts,
Write to home Depot and tell them you will boycott their store until they bring back their BO sponsorship.
Quit whining.
July 31st, 2007 at 2:44 pmtoasterhead - why do you and liberals hate free speech?
Comment by crimedog — July 31, 2007 @ 2:37 pm
We don't. We like free speech. We just happen to believe that any free speech that calls itself "journalism" has a responsibility to be factually accurate.
July 31st, 2007 at 2:44 pmSorry, meant to say "FAIR and balanced"
July 31st, 2007 at 2:44 pmTroll: "liberals are all for free speech has long has the agree with whats being said.
censorship rules!!!!!"
How soon these mentally-challenged trolls forget what started this current exercise. Bill's henchman attacked Jet Blue for being a sponsor of the blogger convention and Jet Blue pulled their sponsorship. Bill is just getting a little of what he's been dishing out.
And, by all means complain to MSNBC about Olberman and confront his sponsors. It's a free country.
July 31st, 2007 at 2:44 pmOk,
July 31st, 2007 at 2:44 pmWell Lefties don't cry when we target Olbermann's sponsors.
What's fair is fair, right?
Are you gonna cry when we go after Olbermann’s sponsor?
Hmmm?
Comment by Doltron — July 31, 2007 @ 2:28 pm
Well considering about 2 3rds of the country are opposed to the war in Iraq and Bush, thus they are opposed to O'lielly, and since most of O'lielly's audience consists of old people in doublewides with few dollars and even less sense, I'd say go for it.
Bring it on.
July 31st, 2007 at 2:44 pmOk,
Well Lefties don’t cry when we target Olbermann’s sponsors.
What’s fair is fair, right?
Comment by Voltron — July 31, 2007 @ 2:44 pm
You still haven't explained why you hate capitalsim and democracy.
July 31st, 2007 at 2:46 pmcrimedog: "why do you and liberals hate free speech?"
You might have asked O'Reilly why he hates free speech when he harassed the CEO of Jet Blue about his sponsorship of the blogging convention, but I'm guessing it didn't occur to you.
July 31st, 2007 at 2:46 pmBARTLEBEE,
ho's Doltron?
I'm Voltron.
Like the Japanimation series back in the 80's?
But you forgot to mention most of Olbermann's audience are Jihadist sleeper cells and their Leftist collaborators!
July 31st, 2007 at 2:47 pm"Well Lefties don’t cry when we target Olbermann’s sponsors."
Have at it dogmeat, both of you! Should make a huge impact...
July 31st, 2007 at 2:47 pmWell Lefties don’t cry when we target Olbermann’s sponsors.
What’s fair is fair, right?
Comment by Voltron — July 31, 2007 @ 2:44 pm
But I'm always crying anyway. Haven't you noticed?
July 31st, 2007 at 2:47 pmIts funny to listen to you worms crying.
The right wing along with Oreilly worked like the devil to destroy the career of three incredibly talented young women, called the Dixie Chicks, because they dared to voice opinions contrary to yours.
Now, like the cry babies you are, you're in here, crying because one store chain drops that walking sack of crap, O'lielly.
What a bunch of sissies.
July 31st, 2007 at 2:48 pmSounds like Voltron got about 120 joules this morning when his electric gumbrush shorted out...
July 31st, 2007 at 2:49 pmWrite to home Depot and tell them you will boycott their store until they bring back their BO sponsorship.
Comment by Egreggious, Esq. — July 31, 2007 @ 2:44 pm
:|
You want them to sponsor body odor?
July 31st, 2007 at 2:49 pmTroll--How soon these mentally-challenged trolls forget what started this current exercise. Bill’s henchman attacked Jet Blue for being a sponsor of the blogger convention and Jet Blue pulled their sponsorship. Bill is just getting a little of what he’s been dishing out.
Lowe's withdrew before that. Maybe you should look in the mirror to see a mentakky challenged troll
July 31st, 2007 at 2:50 pmIf Olberman's sponsors are attacked by the right wing, we will of course be letting those sponsors know how we feel about it.
I hope that doesn't qualify as crying.
July 31st, 2007 at 2:50 pmBut I’m always crying anyway. Haven’t you noticed?
Comment by Egreggious, Esq. — July 31, 2007 @ 2:47 pm
It's catching....
*sobbing*
July 31st, 2007 at 2:50 pmVoltron, the first modern movement to punish corporations for sponsoring things people didn't agree with was Anita Bryant's boycott of Florida orange juice over gay rights. Before that, I remember conservatives burning and destroying Beatles albums because they didn't like something Lennon said. More recently, conservatives have often used this as a political tool. O'Reilly, Savage/Weiner, Hannity, Bortz, Coulter and Limbaugh have all, at various times, called for boycotts of certain products because of politics.... so, what the hell are you whining about?
July 31st, 2007 at 2:51 pmBill O = Toast
July 31st, 2007 at 2:51 pm....mentakky challenged troll
Comment by crimedog — July 31, 2007 @ 2:50 pm
That sounds serious.....are you using ointment on that?
July 31st, 2007 at 2:51 pmI love Zooey.
July 31st, 2007 at 2:52 pmYou people have better propoganda than Lenin.
Comment by enough already
And Limbaugh has been hired to promote GMs tree hugger [green] program.
Go figger!
Idiot.
July 31st, 2007 at 2:52 pmso, what the hell are you whining about?
Comment by Ret. Col. Jack Ripper
Colonel, Sir, that would be about everything!
July 31st, 2007 at 2:52 pmKomrade Chairman,
I see we have struck a mighty blow for the revolution.
That Counter-Revolutionary O'Reilly must be silenced!
What do you recommend we do now Glorious leader!
July 31st, 2007 at 2:52 pmBut you forgot to mention most of Olbermann’s audience are Jihadist sleeper cells and their Leftist collaborators!
Comment by Voltron — July 31, 2007 @ 2:47 pm
In case you haven't noticed, Jihadist groups are actually very conservative. Some of their leaders have even issued fatwas against liberals. Makes you wonder who their collaborators really are. Certainly not the conservatives who armed and funded them in the 1980s and are helping them recruit now.
July 31st, 2007 at 2:52 pmcrimedog: "Lowe’s withdrew before that. Maybe you should look in the mirror to see a mentakky challenged troll"
Good one, crimedog. "Mentakky"????!!! You're not helping your cause.
July 31st, 2007 at 2:53 pmKomrade toasterhead,
July 31st, 2007 at 2:54 pmAre you too a follower of our visionary leader Bartlebee?
We don’t. We like free speech. We just happen to believe that any free speech that calls itself “journalism†has a responsibility to be factually accurate
You mean like CNN and the BBC? They have ran many many fake stories.
July 31st, 2007 at 2:54 pmGood one, crimedog. “Mentakky�???!!! You’re not helping your cause.
Comment by Ret. Col. Jack Ripper
And you are???
July 31st, 2007 at 2:55 pmLowe’s withdrew before that. Maybe you should look in the mirror to see a mentakky challenged troll
Comment by crimedog — July 31, 2007 @ 2:50 pm
And before that, the Right persuaded CBS to cancel "The Reagans".
Is that your argument? "They did it first"?
Why don't you lay it on the table: is it okay to pressure a media company or a sponsor to drop programming because of its content, or isn't it?
If it is, then STFU. If it isn't, then you guys have some 'splainin' to do too.
July 31st, 2007 at 2:55 pmWhat do you recommend we do now Glorious leader!
Comment by BARTLEBEE's Follower — July 31, 2007 @ 2:52 pm
Lets start by hanging anyone claiming to be my follower.
Get to work on that and I'll have more for you later.
July 31st, 2007 at 2:55 pmKomrade Chairman,
I see we have struck a mighty blow for the revolution.
That Counter-Revolutionary Olbermann must be silenced!
What do you recommend we do now Glorious leader!
July 31st, 2007 at 2:55 pmCrimedog,
July 31st, 2007 at 2:56 pmYou are a Counter-Revolutionary! I warn you do not argue with our Glorious Chairman Bartlebee!
His wisdom is leading up to a glorious future for the Proletariot!
You mean like CNN and the BBC? They have ran many many fake stories.
Comment by crimedog — July 31, 2007 @ 2:54 pm
And we criticize them when they screw up as well. What's your point?
July 31st, 2007 at 2:56 pmKomrade Chairman,
I see we have struck a mighty blow for the revolution.
That Counter-Revolutionary Olbermann must be silenced!
What do you recommend we do now Glorious leader!
Comment by VOLTRON's DeFlowerer — July 31, 2007 @ 2:55 pm
Hmmmm, I'd like a Tuna Salad Sandwich.
:|
Maybe some chips?
July 31st, 2007 at 2:57 pmLets start by hanging anyone claiming to be my follower.
Get to work on that and I’ll have more for you later.
Comment by BARTLEBEE
Ahhhhh! Werds to big! Make werds small!
July 31st, 2007 at 2:57 pmtoasterhead: "Makes you wonder who their collaborators really are."
al Qaeda's greatest collaborator is GW Bush. He's given them almost everything Osama demanded in the late 90's. Bases out of Saudi Arabia? Check. Remove the "secular dictator" from control of Iraq? Check. Lay down on the job and allow a spectacular al Qaeda attack to proceed successfully? Check. Beef up al Qaeda recruiting around the world. Check. No wonder they love Bush so much and always seem to be supporting him around election time.
July 31st, 2007 at 2:57 pmKomrade Chairman,
July 31st, 2007 at 2:58 pmWhy do you insult me.
I follow your words and wisdom.
We are together in the revolution against the Fascist!
Victory is at hand my leader!
Good one, crimedog. “Mentakky�???!!! You’re not helping your cause.
Comment by Ret. Col. Jack Ripper
And you are???
Comment by crimedog — July 31, 2007 @ 2:55 pm
Yes, he is. Because the Colonel understands the concept of "free speech," but he also understands the concept of "logical consequences."
You and your kind have no clue about consequences, unless someone else.
July 31st, 2007 at 2:58 pmI made a donation to Al Qaeda this morning.
Comment by Egreggious, Esq. — July 31, 2007 @ 2:57 pm
I presume that wasn't earmarked to help with recruitment efforts. I understand they've surpassed their recruitment goals every month since March, 2003.
July 31st, 2007 at 2:59 pmKeep drinking the haterade zooey
July 31st, 2007 at 2:59 pmI love Zooey.
Comment by Egreggious, Esq. — July 31, 2007 @ 2:52 pm
Aw shucks....
July 31st, 2007 at 2:59 pmVegas odds on Cheney's new batteries lasting until the '08 elections...
1:90
See ya, Dick!
July 31st, 2007 at 2:59 pmyou say acting consistent with free speech. wouldn't it be more free if you let O'Reilly say whatever he wants and let the people decide for themselves?
Is it okay for Christians to band together to boycott the sponsors of anything that promotes any other religion or atheism?
Wouldn't it signal a lack of faith in the ideology? That's what you're doing.
If your ideas are strong, you shouldn't be afraid of what Bill O'Reilly has to say.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:00 pmFree speech?
Bill can talk all he wants.
He makes the right look ridiculous.
[Because they are, I guess].
July 31st, 2007 at 3:00 pmKeep drinking the haterade zooey
Comment by crimedog — July 31, 2007 @ 2:59 pm
Keep living in Stupid Land, monkey boy.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:00 pmKomrade Chairman,
Why do you insult me.
Comment by BARTLEBEE's Swallower — July 31, 2007 @ 2:58 pm
Gee I don't know.
Because you make it so easy?
July 31st, 2007 at 3:01 pmThe Far right non-secular non-progressive non-move on.org wing takes another hit!!
One more hit, and we've sunk their battleship.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:01 pmJinx, paul.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:02 pmIf your ideas are strong, you shouldn’t be afraid of what Bill O’Reilly has to say.
Comment by paul — July 31, 2007 @ 3:00 pm
The people decided -- not to shop at HomeDepot.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:02 pm"Stalinism at work.
OK we’re gonna go after sponsors of Keith Olbermann!
Let’s see how you like that!
Comment by Voltron"
...and...what are you going to tell those sponsors? Exactly?
July 31st, 2007 at 3:02 pmI'm sure BO will be just fine. He's still got his "No Spin Zone Gear" that he can sell at grossly inflated prices to his grossly inflated fans to maintain his grossly egotistical and grossly wrong show. Especially, if each of the trolls here commit to buying a gross.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:02 pmLibetards are scared of Fox and BOR. Their hero Olbermann and all the liberal hate sites have done little to stop Fox or BOR.
So now the libetards are trying censorship
July 31st, 2007 at 3:03 pmActually I think many of the shows on Fox are funny. Simpsons, Southpark. Bill Oreilly is the funniest parody news show ever!
It is supposed to be a parody isn't it?
Yukk Yukk
July 31st, 2007 at 3:03 pmIf your ideas are strong, you shouldn’t be afraid of what Bill O’Reilly has to say. -Comment by paul
Paul, Paul, Paul. We aren't afraid of anything BO says. We don't even listen.
Billdo has been blowing bullshit on the airwaves since the '80's.
Enough is enough.
When people in mass communications lie on a nightly basis to drive an agenda that the majority disagrees with how can they survive? They don't. His time has long come & gone.
Bye, Billdo. Take care, & watch those phone calls...you're on 'the list'
July 31st, 2007 at 3:04 pmIf your ideas are strong, you shouldn’t be afraid of what Bill O’Reilly has to say.
Comment by pawn — July 31, 2007 @ 3:00 pm
We're not.
Its more like a gag reflex.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:04 pmKeep living in Stupid Land, monkey boy.
Comment by Zooey
don't drink to much haterade
July 31st, 2007 at 3:04 pmSo now the libetards are trying censorship
Comment by crimedog — July 31, 2007 @ 3:03 pm
Because you showed us how effective it is.
What happened to the DailyKos site anyway? I sure miss it.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:04 pmIt is supposed to be a parody isn’t it?
Comment by Jeebus Khrist — July 31, 2007 @ 3:03 pm
I thought it was a cartoon.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:04 pmKeep drinking the haterade
_____________________
OK, this is admittedly quite clever. Unless, the troll is just reading from the label on the bottle that Rove has been sending every week.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:05 pmBARTLEBEE,
July 31st, 2007 at 3:06 pmOur next move must be to silence Bill!
So now the libetards are trying censorship -Comment by crimedog
Poor Prattling Pavlovian Pooch
July 31st, 2007 at 3:07 pmLibetards are scared of Fox and BOR.
Comment by slimedog — July 31, 2007 @ 3:03 pm
Fox and BOR?
Sounds like a sitcom.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:07 pmLibetards are scared of Fox and BOR. Their hero Olbermann and all the liberal hate sites have done little to stop Fox or BOR.
So now the libetards are trying censorship
Comment by crimedog — July 31, 2007 @ 3:03 pm
Wow. What a bankrupt collection of trolls. They don't understand the concept of "censorship", they don't understand the concept of "free speech" and they hate capitalism and democracy.
But at least they subscribe to the bedrock value of the conservative movement: IOKIYAR.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:07 pmBOR.
I guess thats the phonetic descriptor of Bill O'reilly?
July 31st, 2007 at 3:08 pmI thought it was a cartoon.
Comment by BARTLEBEE
Naw, its Marionettes. If you look real close you can see the strings.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:08 pmWhy do the trolls keep mentioning Keith Olbermann?
I'm no shrink but it sure seems that they are afraid of him, thus the threat to go after him when he has done nothing wrong.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:09 pmThere sure a lot of "dog" trolls. Has there been some interspecies breeding program going on at one of those neocon think tanks?
July 31st, 2007 at 3:09 pmUh oh, Bill O'Reilly has lost a sponsor on his website, and we all know that he makes his money from the website. Boy, this really had to hurt him, Ill bet he lost at least $1000.
Have any sponsors dropped themselves from his cable broadcasts?
Anyhoo, all the hyperbole about shopping at HD now, I call bullshiite. Everyone knows libs cant tell the difference between a metric chalkline and a standard one.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:10 pmReally? I thought it was claymation or something.
Puppets.
Go figure.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:10 pmThis is truly rich. Whenever progs talk about truth in broadcasting, the repukes start prattling on about how we need to "let the market decide", and how to do otherwise is Stalinist.
Well, kids, the "market" has come to a decision...and all I'm hearing from the idiot right are cries of "censorship!".
Funny how it wasn't "censorship!" when Air America was in question...then, it was "let the market decide!".
Live by the market, die by the market, morons.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:10 pmFox and Bor
I think BOROX sounds better =)
July 31st, 2007 at 3:11 pmWhy do the trolls keep mentioning Keith Olbermann?
I’m no shrink but it sure seems that they are afraid of him, thus the threat to go after him when he has done nothing wrong.
Comment by trueblue — July 31, 2007 @ 3:09 pm
Careful true, next you'll be accused of drinking the "haterade."
Heh. The wit on that troll is as sharp as butter!
July 31st, 2007 at 3:11 pmwho boycotted Air America?
July 31st, 2007 at 3:11 pmOr maybe the dog trolls are part of a pack known as FOX and Hounds.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:12 pmI’m no shrink but it sure seems that they are afraid of him, thus the threat to go after him when he has done nothing wrong.
Comment by trueblue — July 31, 2007 @ 3:09 pm
Because they ARE afraid of him.
People don't fear liars, like Bill O'lielly. They hate and despise him, but they don't fear him. His words are lies, and lies are always exposed.
But liars fear the truth. And since Olberman's show offers facts the right wing is terrifed of his words.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:12 pmNaw, its Marionettes. If you look real close you can see the strings.
Just like Keith Olbermann and Chris Matthews!
July 31st, 2007 at 3:12 pmComment by LibTeenie — July 31, 2007 @ 3:10 pm
Sometimes, LibTeenie is the voice of reason.
Apparently, if Home Depot is going to continue sponsorship of Bill's TV and radio programs, we should continue to shop at Lowe's.
Good point.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:13 pmI think BOROX sounds better =)
Comment by Jeebus Khrist — July 31, 2007 @ 3:11 pm
I was thinking more along the lines of BORING.
:|
The Factor.
Its a snoozer.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:13 pmFunny how it wasn’t “censorship!†when Air America was in question…then, it was “let the market decide!â€.
Live by the market, die by the market, morons.
Comment by TripMaster Monkey — July 31, 2007 @ 3:10 pm
I'm pretty sure that if we let the market decide, there would be porn on every channel, every moment of everyday.
Just sayin'
July 31st, 2007 at 3:13 pmJust like Keith Olbermann and Chris Matthews!
Comment by Voltron — July 31, 2007 @ 3:12 pm
I've seen them on Chris Matthews.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:13 pmwho's afraid of Olby???
July 31st, 2007 at 3:14 pm" And since Olberman’s show offers facts the right wing is terrifed of his words."
So wht not have on people that disagree with him?
Also he's been caught inlies and never apologizes!
I respect Bill Maher who's a real thinker.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:14 pmNot Olbermann who's just a Sock Puppet!
Anyhoo, all the hyperbole about shopping at HD now, I call bullshiite. Everyone knows libs cant tell the difference between a metric chalkline and a standard one.
Comment by LibTeenie
Poor Perturbed Pre-Pubescent.
When I used a string covered in chalk, and snapped a chalkline, it was never in Metric or Standard. It was a Straight line.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:15 pmI’m pretty sure that if we let the market decide, there would be porn on every channel, every moment of everyday.
Just sayin’
Comment by Zooey — July 31, 2007 @ 3:13 pm
Then I say, let the market decide!
July 31st, 2007 at 3:16 pmI respect Bill Maher who’s a real thinker.
Not Olbermann who’s just a Sock Puppet!
Comment by Voltron — July 31, 2007 @ 3:14 pm
You're a sockpuppet - or at least a GOP puppet. Get a life - loser.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:16 pmHA!! The trolls won't go after Olberman unless O'Lielly tells them to and as we all know ole loofa boy refuses to even say Keith's name.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:16 pmIt was a Straight line.
Sorry no, there is nothing straight on the liberal side.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:16 pmWhen I used a string covered in chalk, and snapped a chalkline, it was never in Metric or Standard. It was a Straight line.
Comment by Jeebus Khrist — July 31, 2007 @ 3:15 pm
Damn! I missed that one. Good work, JK.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:17 pmI respect Bill Maher who’s a real thinker
Comment by Doltron — July 31, 2007 @ 3:14 pm
Cool.
Cause he "thinks" you're an idiot.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:17 pmWhen I used a string covered in chalk, and snapped a chalkline, it was never in Metric or Standard. It was a Straight line.
Comment by Jeebus Khrist
That. Was. Brilliant.
:)
July 31st, 2007 at 3:17 pmI was thinking more along the lines of BORING
BOReOX SNEWZ mebbe?
July 31st, 2007 at 3:17 pmSorry no, there is nothing straight on the liberal side.
Comment by LibTeenie — July 31, 2007 @ 3:16 pm
If by Straight, you mean straight like Ted Haggard, then you're correct.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:18 pmCareful true, next you’ll be accused of drinking the “haterade.â€
Comment by Zooey
Oh, yah. That's my M.O. alright.
:P
July 31st, 2007 at 3:18 pmOr maybe you meant straight like Mark Foley?
July 31st, 2007 at 3:18 pmMarkos Moulitas, was caught in a NBC To Catch a Predator Sting.
Olbermann, Timm Russert Brian Willaims and Chris Matthews had this story squatched!
Comment by Pittbull
That was Mark Foley, PhhttBaal
July 31st, 2007 at 3:19 pmBARTLEBEE,
July 31st, 2007 at 3:19 pmHow do you know what Maher thinks?
You don't even know my ideology.
You just assum because I'm not a Left, that I'm Bush supporter.
You'd be surprise!
If people object to what O'Reilly is saying they will start watching CNN.
What you are doing is denying them the right to make up their own mind. Apparently, you know better.
I guess you must feel that it's appropriate for fundamentalist Christian's to decide the reproductive rights of women. Why let them make that decision. Christians know better and it's for their own good anyway.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:19 pmComment by Pittbull — July 31, 2007 @ 3:17 pm
I hope nobody thinks you're serious. :)
July 31st, 2007 at 3:19 pmJohn Gibson, was caught in a NBC To Catch a Predator Sting.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:20 pmO'Reilly, Sean Hannity Britt Hume and Roger Ailes had this story squatched!
It's a true atory and will be breaking in a few days!
July 31st, 2007 at 3:21 pmBARTLEBEE,
How do you know what Maher thinks?
Comment by Doltron — July 31, 2007 @ 3:19 pm
By those little things coming out of his mouth called words.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:21 pmThat. Was. Brilliant. 8) Comment by trueblue
TYVM TB }8@D
July 31st, 2007 at 3:21 pmWhen I used a string covered in chalk, and snapped a chalkline, it was never in Metric or Standard. It was a Straight line.
Comment by Jeebus Khrist
That. Was. Brilliant.
Comment by trueblue — July 31, 2007 @ 3:17 pm
I think that's the best comment of the day!!
July 31st, 2007 at 3:22 pmcrimedog,
July 31st, 2007 at 3:22 pmYes!
Olbermann when he was on ESPN was dating a 16 year old.
That's a fact.
Many ESPN employess have said so!
That's why he was let go!
You don’t even know my ideology.
Comment by Doltron — July 31, 2007 @ 3:19 pm
You don't even know your ideology.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:22 pmhearsay as fact
July 31st, 2007 at 3:24 pmI’m pretty sure that if we let the market decide, there would be porn on every channel, every moment of everyday.
I'm currently on a split screen with nunsgonewild.com. I hope progressives don't start boycotting that.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:24 pmCan someone help me out here?
Comment by mikey r — July 31, 2007 @ 3:22 pm
Sure mikey.
That would be Bill Oreilly.
He was the one sued for sexual harrassment.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:24 pmIt’s a true atory and will be breaking in a few days!
Comment by Pitbull
And Osama Bin Forgotten is your roomate just because I typed it.
Good thing \\/\// Doesn't care where he is.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:25 pmIt’s a true atory and will be breaking in a few days!
Comment by Pitbull — July 31, 2007 @ 3:21 pm
It's all over the comment threads at RedState! Look for yourself!
July 31st, 2007 at 3:26 pmHe was the one sued for sexual harrassment.
Comment by BARTLEBEE
I can just see those little Oompa men from Willey Wonkas chocolat factory singing;
Loofah Loofah
July 31st, 2007 at 3:27 pmDippity Doo
I have a Loofah
Bigger than You
let’s see… Olberman and O’reilly… I know ONE of them was sued for sexual harrassment, but I don’t recall which one… I think one of them also wrote a novel with sexually explicit scenes in it that would make a 70s porn producer blush with embarrassment, but I can’t recall which one…
Can someone help me out here?
Comment by mikey r
Go google search Olbermann and ESPN,Rebecca Lobo,pornstars,Karma Bites.
Why do you think Olbermann was the only host not to be invited to the big sportscenter bash a while back?
July 31st, 2007 at 3:27 pmpaul sez:
July 31st, 2007 at 3:27 pmFunny you should ask...
I’m currently on a split screen with nunsgonewild.com. I hope progressives don’t start boycotting that.
Comment by paul — July 31, 2007 @ 3:24 pm
You can count on me, paul!
July 31st, 2007 at 3:27 pmPorn Star Marey Carey wouldn't even date Olbermann
July 31st, 2007 at 3:28 pmInvented stories won't help you guys.
Oreilly's losing sponsors and listeners every day.
People are starting to get sick of the bloated windbag.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:28 pmO'Reilly the most watch show on cable news
July 31st, 2007 at 3:29 pmAs far as Air America goes, I think it's cool that most of their sponsors (at least locally) actually support the progressive agenda. I hated it when I used to hear Walmart ads on the station.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:29 pmwhat Invented stories?
July 31st, 2007 at 3:30 pmIt's so great that Joker keeps coming back.....
July 31st, 2007 at 3:30 pmAn ass by any other name...
Porn Star Marey Carey wouldn’t even date Olbermann
Comment by crimedog — July 31, 2007 @ 3:28 pm
She wouldn't date me either.
But I suppose she didn't turn you down, you dog!
July 31st, 2007 at 3:30 pmwhat Invented stories?
Comment by slimedog — July 31, 2007 @ 3:30 pm
You're right.
Concocted is a better word.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:31 pmI’m no shrink but it sure seems that they are afraid of him, thus the threat to go after him when he has done nothing wrong.
Comment by trueblue
Me thinks it is a case of the Repugs with Keith O envy! They have nothing like him on any of their megaphone Rightie markets.
Gotta hurt, huh Trollies!
July 31st, 2007 at 3:32 pmO’Reilly the most watch show on cable news
Comment by Slimedog — July 31, 2007 @ 3:29 pm
You really are struggling with the grammatics there snoopy.
Maybe you should hit the Speak-n-Spell a little harder and come back when you're better prepared.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:33 pmTHE FREE MARKET WORKS ITS MAGIC AGAIN.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:33 pmPorn Star Marey Carey wouldn’t even date Olbermann
Comment by crimedog
You don't date porn stars you PAY porn stars.
Hey tell me about Matt Sanchez and the 'Publicans!
July 31st, 2007 at 3:35 pm" Everyone knows libs cant tell the difference between a metric chalkline and a standard one.
Comment by LibTeenie — July 31, 2007 @ 3:10 pm"
Please, explain the difference to us. It couldn't possibly make any less sense than your take on politics.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:35 pmYou know the boycott I hated? The Montgomery Bus Boycott? That was downright anti-American.
H/T Just Curious
July 31st, 2007 at 3:37 pmChildish maybe.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:45 pmBest be careful there, Bartlebee -- these trolls look like a mean bunch. Before you know it, they'll be saying you're a doody-head and invoking the "I'm Rubber, You're Glue" Rule.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:45 pmBefore you know it, they’ll be saying you’re a doody-head and invoking the “I’m Rubber, You’re Glue†Rule.
Comment by mikey r — July 31, 2007 @ 3:45 pm
I'd say that horse has already left the barn.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:48 pmpaul sez:
who boycotted Air America?
Funny you should ask…
Comment by TripMaster Monkey — July 31, 2007 @ 3:27 pm
This is a list of advertisers that don't want to be on Air America. It doesn't say anything about a conserted efforts of conservatives trying to get advertisers to boycott.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:51 pmBoycott France.
Boycott JetBlue.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:53 pmSuch mature discourse! Accusing people of pederasty and beastiality. Who let the kids out of their cages?
July 31st, 2007 at 3:53 pmSuch mature discourse! Accusing people of pederasty and beastiality. Who let the kids out of their cages?
Comment by Wilco — July 31, 2007 @ 3:53 pm
Well thats kinda my fault Wilco.
Once and I while I get the urge to help them look stupid.
Not that they need my help.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:56 pmI rest my case.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:57 pmThe Joker left because he didn't even need to be here
July 31st, 2007 at 3:57 pmThere's enough hate-filld trolls on this thread without him
BARTLEBEE, you might've helped them but it was the baseless accusations from Pittbull that started this garbage.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:59 pmMaybe their aim is to make it impossible to parody them.
July 31st, 2007 at 3:59 pmOK. I'm done. The Party Of Hate has killed yet another thread.
July 31st, 2007 at 4:06 pmOne of the unintended consequences of Caller ID: pre-teen kids who in days gone by would make prank calls and ask an innocent homeowner if their refrigerator was running, or if they had "Prince Albert in a can", now must turn to the anonymity of the internet to get their jollies.
The technology is a bit more sophisticated; too bad their material isn't.
July 31st, 2007 at 4:07 pmWhat about those climatologists and scientists receiving funds or a salary to study "global warming?" They are on the payroll, you know. Definitely a conflict of interest. If they admit the truth, they're out of a job.
Al Gore's propaganda film has been debunked. We'll all have a good laugh about it at Gore's expense in a few years.
July 31st, 2007 at 4:11 pmHome Depot has the right to advertise wherever they want to advertise. Fox has a large viewing audience and charges larger advertising fees than other networks. Home Depot may simply be trying to cut their expenses. The stock hasn't done well since the real estate bubble ended.
July 31st, 2007 at 4:14 pm(yawn)
only 1 more month until school starts back up, and then the constant troll induced idiocy of posts will dwindle down to weekends
Yippee!
July 31st, 2007 at 4:18 pm-------
Thanks for the list of companies that I'll be supporting.
I hate Republicans; but I hate Liberals/Progressives even more.
Now (N.O.W?), if Progressives stopped supporting the anti-male hate movement known as Feminism, then I'd consider providing ample resources towards Progressives. But until then ...
-------
July 31st, 2007 at 4:21 pmgood liberal trolls get on muh nerves
July 31st, 2007 at 4:21 pmNow (N.O.W?), if Progressives stopped supporting the anti-male hate movement known as Feminism, then I’d consider providing ample resources towards Progressives. But until then …
——-
Comment by bilbo
Sorry. Much as we'd love to have you in the program, there are no substitutions available.
July 31st, 2007 at 4:28 pm#207 Home Depot may simply be trying to cut their expenses. Comment by muckdog
Or maybe they just decided that having 79% of the population shopping with them is better than having the 21%ers that drool over billo and make messes on the aisles when they get into their howler monkey shit-slinging impersonations.
July 31st, 2007 at 4:33 pmPlease forward that CT_V1 is sorry for disrespecting Wayne’s mil. service.
July 31st, 2007 at 4:40 pmThe technology is a bit more sophisticated; too bad their material isn’t.
Comment by spit take
Actually you can use the starcode *67 then the number you wish to dial and it won't show up on caller ID.
Secondly, Caller ID can be spoofed.
July 31st, 2007 at 4:50 pmmuckdog: "Al Gore’s propaganda film has been debunked."
This isn't the first time you've posted this. The first time I saw it, I asked you for a little documentation on that. You never provided that documentation or anything useful for even arguing a point. Let's see it. I don't care if it's some industry-sponsored shill spilling oil propaganda, why do you say the movie has been "de-bunked?" If you can't go any farther than your simple claim, thinking people are going to have to conclude that you don't know what you're talking about.
July 31st, 2007 at 4:54 pmBilbo: "Now (N.O.W?), if Progressives stopped supporting the anti-male hate movement known as Feminism, then I’d consider providing ample resources towards Progressives. But until then …"
Ahh, yes, Feminism, the radical notion that women should have the same rights as men and be paid the same for the same work. You know, I don't think liberals are going to give that one up so, it's all right. We don't need you.
July 31st, 2007 at 4:56 pmI hate Republicans; but I hate Liberals/Progressives even more. -bilbo
I guessing you don't get many invites to social get togethers with that rosey outlook.
Might a suggest becoming a hermit and cave-dwelling?
July 31st, 2007 at 4:59 pmIt really feels good to sign that petition and have it actually work!
July 31st, 2007 at 5:00 pmComment by Ret. Col. Jack Ripper
Nice try but you are dealing with two trolls who think the earth is flat and women should be drug around by the hair. This happens when you get too much DNA inbreeding. They are products of their environment and "No Child Left Behind".
July 31st, 2007 at 5:00 pmUpside: Hey, you're probably right, but I'm just taking a stab at provoking a little self-examination on their part. I usually don't try real hard though.
July 31st, 2007 at 5:10 pmRet. Col. Jack Ripper
Good idea, as self-examination to them is what they do in the mirror when they bend over and look between their legs in the mirror after the monthly bath.
July 31st, 2007 at 5:12 pm"Olbermann when he was on ESPN was dating a 16 year old.
That’s a fact.
Many ESPN employess have said so!
That’s why he was let go!
Comment by Pittbull"
And the Bible is FACT! The guy in the robes at church has said so!
July 31st, 2007 at 5:14 pmMight a suggest becoming a hermit and cave-dwelling?
Comment by Jeebus Khrist — July 31, 2007 @ 4:59 pm
that bus is long gone. Between bilbo and muckdog, I think that including mental health coverage in our new socialized medicine program will be necessary. Two more screwed-up, self-hating antiAmerican nutbags have never before been so close to each other.
July 31st, 2007 at 5:27 pmHow pathetic are you people?
Dark Day for Democrats
July 31st, 2007 at 5:28 pmThe only reason O'Lielly and Mann Coulter get any airtime whatsoever is the outrageousness of the remarks they make ala "SHUT UP" or "all Liberal should be shot".
You watch them for what I call a gapers effect (accident on the side of the road) mentality.
July 31st, 2007 at 5:39 pmI sense that a few trolls are responsible for nearly all troll posts here, using perhaps a half dozen identities per troll. Well, you're a pathetic lot, that's for sure.
July 31st, 2007 at 5:45 pmJammieWearingFool, your blog suffers from a common problem: assertion without documentation. Your main assertion throughout the rather pedestrian re-reporting of already read news releases selectively chosen for their optimistic outlooks is that this kind of news drives liberals crazy, but you offer not the slightest evidence that any liberal of note has, in fact, been driven mad. All that's left is your silly projection of how you think liberals react to things. That's nothing but rank, uninformed opinion which is, evidently what you get when you go to your silly blog.
July 31st, 2007 at 5:47 pmCol. Jack Ripper, I have provided many links in the past. Maybe you don't know how to click on links. Are you waiting for the government to set up a social program to click the links for you?
Here are some for you:
Global warming hysterics trumped by physics. (This may be the best link of all).
Global Warming: The Cold, Hard Facts.
Scientists respond to Gore's warnings of climate catastrophe.
Latest scientific studies refute Greenland ice melt claims.
Climate extremism.
And for fun:
Another parking lot being measured for climate change.
July 31st, 2007 at 6:17 pmO'Reilly doesn't deserve to be on air anywhere. He maligns abuse victims, and murder victims. He has maligned our patriotic troops who died at Malmady. He was wrong to do so. He often says things that are racist, sexist and biased. He has no credibility as he was himself accused of sexual harassment. The lawsuit was settled out of court. Also he routinely lies on his show. His attitude towards the brilliant Mr. Olbermann is often childish and petty. Other advertisers should all be encouraged to pull advertising from his show.
July 31st, 2007 at 6:42 pmMuckdog, if I gave you an article about something and it was from The Progressive Daily, you would dismiss it as liberal. Michael R. Fox is part of the Townhall.com crew which includes Coulter, Savage/Weiner, Limbaugh and Hannity. Is Michael R. Fox as dependable as his co-workers? So you've got this guy against 99% of the world's climatologists. Let's just say I'd be skeptical.
July 31st, 2007 at 7:15 pmAnd, Muckdog, your "scientist" in the Canadian Free Press article cites Michael Chricton as one of his sources.... BZZZZZZZZZZ! Sci Fi author vs. most of the world's scientists? Again, I'm very skeptical.
July 31st, 2007 at 7:16 pmJack, I can't help it if you're stupid. I gave you some links. There are thousands more out there that refute the claims of global warming hysterics.
If all you can do is attack the author or source instead of the science, then I'm afraid you'll have to live in ignorance.
And clearly you did not read the links anyways. Otherwise you'd realize how dumb you sound when you cite "most of the world's scientists." It's simply not true.
There is a one-word answer on why man has nothing to do with global warming: Physics.
On my side is physics and science. On your side is a cult-like belief in something that cannot be proven.
July 31st, 2007 at 7:35 pmFrom muckflogs first URL
Obviously, other warming forces were at work before humans had anything to do with it.
Yeh that pretty much explains it muckdog. Did you even bother to read thru the site?
A retired nuclear scientist and chemistry professor that lives in washington. Grassroots insitute GIFT is a public policy thinktank.
And is part of Townhall.com A conservative mouthpiece.
Nice try muckdog ya disengenous hack.
July 31st, 2007 at 9:42 pmOn my side is physics and science. On your side is a cult-like belief in something that cannot be proven.
Comment by muckdog
On your side is a retired nuclear professor who isn't a climatologist.
He says;
Now we have learned much more based upon observations of cosmic radiation, their sources, and the Sun’s magnetic fields, combined and new discoveries in the laboratory. A new and more comprehensive understanding of our planetary environment has emerged. This gives us a scientifically defensible explanation of both global warming.
First off the Suns solar radiation hasn't changed enough to affect the earths atmosphere. The oceans act as a heatsink to maintain it. The Suns magnetic field is about as strong as a refrigerator magnet.
These are not new. He does not tell what these new laboratory studies are. he doesn't speak of the thermohaline conveyor. Or El ninas and El ninos.
He also doesn't speak about a comet that likely exploded in our atmosphere 13,000 years ago that sent manking running for the caves and set the upper hemisphere on fire. The real armegeddon your bible talks about. Fire and Brimstone coming from the sky. People and animals igniting into flames.
July 31st, 2007 at 10:01 pmRiddle! How many conservatives does it take to wipe MuckDog's ass? Answer! None..because it is a scientific fact that good anal cleaning is proper hygiene and because conservatives dont believe in science, ass wiping would be considered "liberal bunk"...lol
July 31st, 2007 at 10:08 pmJeebus, you haven't taken physics either, eh?
The one word answer to the "global warming" cult who believe that man is causing climate change: PHYSICS.
LOL
August 1st, 2007 at 1:35 amrighties lose again
don't feel bad for them, they're used to it, and they deserve to.
August 1st, 2007 at 4:20 pm