Think Progress

O’Hanlon And Pollack Call For Another ‘Six Months Or So’ In Iraq

Last week, in their now infamous New York Times op-ed, Brookings Institution analysts Michael O’Hanlon and Kenneth Pollack declared “there is enough good happening on the battlefields of Iraq today that Congress should plan on sustaining the effort at least into 2008.”

On Fox News Sunday yesterday, O’Hanlon and Pollack put a timeframe on their call for stay the course: six months. “It’s basically saying nothing more dramatic than give it six more months or so, maybe nine more months,” said O’Hanlon. “I agree with Mike entirely that we can’t give this much more time,” added Pollack. Watch it:

[flv http://video.thinkprogress.org/2007/08/OHanlonFriedman.320.240.flv]

The media watchdogs at FAIR noted in 2006 that New York Times columnist Tom Friedman had been repeatedly claiming the “decisive” six months in Iraq were right around the corner. FAIR reported that Friedman’s “‘decisive’ six months have lasted two and a half years.”

Many in the blogosphere warned that O’Hanlon and Pollack were engaging in the same tactic. As Atrios has frequently noted, many proponents of the war have offered “Friedman Units (F.U.)” — i.e. a continual “six-month period that would be required in order to determine the outcome of the Iraq War” — as a way to seek public acquiescence for the occupation.

This is not the first time O’Hanlon and Pollack have called for six months to bring stability to Iraq. On March 1, 2007, O’Hanlon penned an op-ed for the Wall Street Journal arguing for the same extension he called for yesterday:

There are good reasons to give the war effort, now almost four years old, another six to nine months before concluding that the current strategy should be discarded and a much different one…

One year earlier — on March 2, 2006 — Pollack told students at Georgetown that there was “a critical six month window of opportunity to bring some form of stability to Iraq.”

As Gregory Djerejian wrote on Friday, O’Hanlon and Pollack appear to be perpetually “guilty of rose colored glasses” when it comes to Iraq.

Digg It!

Transcript:

CHRIS WALLACE: And absent serious moves toward national reconciliation, does the surge make sense?

MICHAEL O’HANLON: I think it makes sense for a while to see if the momentum can spread from the battlefield to the political theater. Ken’s the greater expert on Iraqi politics than I, but my overall impression is if you don’t get even some top-level, top-down movement coming up fairly soon, this thing can’t work. Politics trumps the battleground in the end.

And I think, therefore, this is an interim report from us on the surge, and it’s basically saying nothing more dramatic than give it six more months or so, maybe nine more months.

If things don’t start to progress in that time, I personally would be a lot less optimistic and/or in favor of trying to prod the Iraqis to dump Prime Minister Maliki. That’s me, not Ken.

WALLACE: Well, let me ask you, Ken, do you see any signs that Maliki and the parliament are getting their act together?

KENNETH POLLACK: Basically none. The political side was absolutely dead in the water, exactly as Mike is suggesting.

You know, one thing to keep in mind is that as General Petraeus has repeatedly pointed out, the idea is that with security and local- level economic and political development, you create some space. There’s an expectation that the politics is going to lag. It’s going to take longer.

But this level of political stalemate is absolutely unacceptable. And I agree with Mike entirely that we can’t give this much more time.



98 Responses to “O’Hanlon And Pollack Call For Another ‘Six Months Or So’ In Iraq”

  1. Grand Moff Texan says:

    The “Snooze Bar of Death.”

    The pro-war fringe can’t be bothered to get out of bed and actually, you know, do something about it, so they hit the snooze bar of death.

    No wonder they’re a minority.
    .


  2. gorn by any other name says:

    Kind of like another 5 year plan in the USSR?


  3. SGT Higgins says:

    Pollack told students at Georgetown that there was “a critical six month window of opportunity to bring some form of stability to Iraq.”

    “Starting…..NOW!” —- 3 months later —– “Ok, NOW!” …… 3 months later….. “No wait..NOW!”…..


  4. Ben Dover says:

    And I’m sure these two nitwits will volunteer for 6 months in Iraqnam themselves. Right?


  5. Pyrrho says:

    Well, it’s not up to them.

    Cheney/Tancredo 2008!


  6. ∞Ω says:

    What the hey, that’s only one more Friedman and maybe one more Warner–no big deal.

    


  7. Jackie says:

    These two abled bodied young men should suit up and join the military. O’Hanlon And Pollack are willing to let more soldiers say in Iraq but wont serve themselves. They come back after a short visit to report lies for the White House. Like Bush/Cheney would were cowards and never served this country in the time of need. I can never understand how people willing let our soldiers die, yet still want more to die by staying in the Iraq Civil War.


  8. Mr. Peenis says:

    I call for another 7 months or so…. beat that libs!


  9. Tobey Tall says:

    5 more Iraqi ministers boycott Cabinet


  10. dim wit says:

    Former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld: “It could last six days, six weeks. I doubt six months.”
    I feel like I’ve heard this before….


  11. Tobey Tall says:

    3670

    lets see i remember News years night 3000 US troops dead

    another 6 months another 700 dead ………

    Why fight them at home when they want you there on the battlefield now


  12. --Blue Girl says:

    So these fools are cool with another thousand dead Americans. Too bad they won;’t be in any of those flag draped coffins at Dover.


  13. Erica says:

    Estimated by the Borgen Project, the United States has already funded 340 billion dollars into the war already. We have lost more soldiers and resources to this black hole situation, than we have gained anything fighting the “war on terror”. How about cheaper and more effective solutions to foreign policy? Like fighting GLobal Poverty. This is not complex mathematics. This is logic and ethics.


  14. Krazny says:

    Didn’t the pro-war groups in Vietnam say the same thing? another 6 months, lets give the South Vietnam government time to get it together, we will stand up, when they stand down?


  15. Zooey says:

    These guys must know Friedman.

    Wankers.


  16. whiteyfresh says:

    dirty,DIRTY wankers…

    :D


  17. mikey r says:

    After all, what’s a couple more Freidmans?


  18. Brassmask from 3DHS says:

    Fred Thompson 2008.


  19. TerrytheTurtle says:

    “A Friedman, there’s going to be a Friedman! And then we will have the oral s*x!”


  20. Brassmask from 3DHS says:

    Estimated by the Borgen Project, the United States has already funded 340 billion dollars into the war already.

    Comment by Erica

    The Dems don’t have the stones to cut off the funds.


  21. RemoveBush says:

    The Dems don’t have the stones to cut off the funds.

    Comment by Brassmask from 3DHS — August 6, 2007 @ 1:02 pm

    Sadly true, but that is what they need to do.


  22. Brassmask from 3DHS says:

    Didn’t the pro-war groups in Vietnam say the same thing? another 6 months, lets give the South Vietnam government time to get it together, we will stand up, when they stand down?

    Comment by Krazny

    The Dems caused a million people to be slaughtered in Vietnam.


  23. CYANOCOBALAMINE says:

    why doesnt somebody …. anybody on the network/cable news say:

    “THIIS IS NONSENSE — THE WAR IS TOTALLY LOST

    MORE SOLDIERS DYING EVERY YEAR

    NOW 12 BILLION A WEEK WASTED

    NATION BUILDING IN REVERSE

    END THIS BOTCHED OCCUPATION NOW !

    BLAME IT ON BUSH AND THE NEOCONS ”

    why wont that message play on any news anywhere in the USA ?

    These so called news organizations were the ones

    OUTRAGEOUSLY INDIGNIANT AT BILL CLINTON FOR F*CKING SOME INTERN LIKE THAT

    THAT ?????????

    RUINED AMERICA…..

    THANK GOD FOR THINK PROGRESS et. al

    because news in america is otherwise DEAD


  24. RemoveBush says:

    The Dems caused a million people to be slaughtered in Vietnam.

    Comment by Brassmask from 3DHS — August 6, 2007 @ 1:03 pm

    So that makes it OK to kill thousands????

    That justifies your ignorance?????

    PLEASE!


  25. Dr. Dog says:

    So these fools are cool with another thousand dead Americans. Too bad they won;’t be in any of those flag draped coffins at Dover.

    Comment by –Blue Girl

    You really have no say in the matter. 56% of these troops are Republicans. Only 12% are Dem.


  26. chingebush says:

    The rolling six months. At least until the Repugnicunts are out of office and the adults will make the right decisions.

    Killing and maiming soldiers and civilians, hundreds of billions pissed away. For one pathetic little man’s ego.

    Oh, yes…and his pathetic smag eating defenders. Cant’ forget the sycophants can we?


  27. TerrytheTurtle says:

    The Dems caused a million people to be slaughtered in Vietnam.

    Comment by Brassmask from 3DHS — August 6, 2007 @ 1:03 pm

    Ooh the Big Johnson contest is underway. The rest of the world notes that: “The Americans caused a million people to be slaughtered in Vietnam”.

    Just another lousy empire.


  28. Brassmask from 3DHS says:

    why doesnt somebody …. anybody on the network/cable news say:

    “THIIS IS NONSENSE — THE WAR IS TOTALLY LOST

    Comment by CYANOCOBALAMINE

    Because that would be un-American.


  29. Keith H. says:

    The little cube in the lower left of the picture tells you all you need to know.
    Total bullsh*t from go to whoa.
    I still can’t believe anyone watches this network thinking it’s valid.


  30. hellinabucket says:

    Are these consecutive months?


  31. RemoveBush says:

    “Comment by CYANOCOBALAMINE — August 6, 2007 @ 1:04 pm”

    This if ANYTHING should show America that the news is actually RIGHT leaning and is NOT left as the Republicans like to say……..

    When a BJ get’s more news than TWO BOTCHED WARS, then this is a clear sign of the news being REPUBLICAN RUN.


  32. margaret says:

    They are going to string this thing right along in 3 to 6-month blocks until, oh, about September ‘08 when they announce that things are looking up, victory is imminent, time to begin “redeploying” and thank goodness for repuke resolve!

    bastards


  33. Brassmask from 3DHS says:

    The rolling six months. At least until the Repugnicunts are out of office and the adults will make the right decisions.

    Comment by chingebush

    If you think we are going to stand back and allow Bill Clinton to turn the White House into a whorehouse again, you’re crazy.


  34. Krazny says:

    Pretty much all the Neo-cons have left, is the ability to prolong the war, until Bush is out of office, so the republicans won’t take the blame for the failure. Funny how occupation of Middle eastern countries doesn’t seem to work. Perhaps we should have asked the British, French, and Russians about it, before we invaded.


  35. Publicus says:

    GREAT! Let’s get our troops home now, and send Michael O’Hanlon and Kenneth Pollack over there. They can report back to us in 6 months.


  36. Brassmask from 3DHS says:

    September ‘08 when they announce that things are looking up, victory is imminent, time to begin “redeploying” and thank goodness for repuke resolve!

    bastards

    Comment by margaret

    Get ready for 4 years of Thompson/Rudy, my dear!


  37. RemoveBush says:

    Because that would be un-American.

    Comment by Brassmask from 3DHS — August 6, 2007 @ 1:05 pm

    WRONG!!!!

    Being “un-American” is NOT TELLING THE TRUTH!!!!!

    This is what we stand for.

    Truth, Justice, and the American way…….

    Now it is just “the Bush way”…….. No more Truth and Justice, and America is almost a memory!!!!


  38. Brassmask from 3DHS says:

    GREAT! Let’s get our troops home now

    Comment by Publicus

    How are you going to do that? The Dems are going on vacation for the next month.


  39. --Blue Girl says:

    Really? In my experience, it was pretty evenly split. Officers were more Republican, and even that is changing.

    Actually, the real arguments were not over politics – it was X-Box vs Play Station.


  40. chingebush says:

    Oh Brass balls, you are so right. We can’t have a President getting a bj now, that is just wrong.

    Instead you defend the little loser who starts a war for his own ego.

    Right…. STFU b*tch.


  41. RemoveBush says:

    How are you going to do that? The Dems are going on vacation for the next month.

    Comment by Brassmask from 3DHS — August 6, 2007 @ 1:09 pm

    So you mean that I can still contact my REPUBLICAN representative????? He is not leaving?????

    PLEASE, stop with the IDIOTIC responses…


  42. Marcus Aurelius says:

    September ‘08 when they announce that things are looking up, victory is imminent, time to begin “redeploying” and thank goodness for repuke resolve!

    bastards

    Comment by margaret

    Get ready for 4 years of Thompson/Rudy, my dear!

    Comment by Brassmask from 3DHS — August 6, 2007 @ 1:08 pm

    The only reason that is it unusual to have two fathers give a bride away is that it was unusual, when this custom began, to have more than one father.


  43. hellinabucket says:

    If you think we are going to sit back and watch Bush and Cheney F$#k up the country any more you are crazy.

    Gen Petraeus was in charge of implementing security forces in Iraq between 2003 and 2005. Over 190,000 weapons that were initially for Iraq security forces had gone missing during this time. Those same weapons are being used against our soldiers.

    Care to comment on that (br)Assmask?


  44. Brassmask from 3DHS says:

    We can’t have a President getting a bj now, that is just wrong.

    Comment by chingebush

    Clinton was getting a bj while talking to a congressman about our troops in Bosnia.


  45. Brassmask from 3DHS says:

    So you mean that I can still contact my REPUBLICAN representative????? He is not leaving?????

    Comment by RemoveBush

    He’s not the one who pledged to end the war. The Dems did, and they are leaving town for a month while the war wages on, son.


  46. TerrytheTurtle says:

    Clinton was getting a bj while talking to a congressman about our troops in Bosnia.

    Comment by Brassmask from 3DHS — August 6, 2007 @ 1:13 pm

    Jealous?


  47. --Blue Girl says:

    We have just done wonders for the Iraqi infrastructure! The grid is in such bad shape, that there is no water supply in West Baghdad.

    Oh – and all those missing AK-47’s – 190,000 automatic weaponswent missing when Petraeus was in charge last time!

    (I was on duty at Munson AHC when D P took the billet – within an hour I heard four different enlisted personnel morph his name to “Dave Betrayed-Us”)


  48. Marcus Aurelius says:

    He’s not the one who pledged to end the war. The Dems did, and they are leaving town for a month while the war wages on, son.

    Comment by Brassmask from 3DHS — August 6, 2007 @ 1:15 pm

    What the sound does do is produce a huge amount of saliva and this seems to stimulate the male. A male will stay mounted on the female for a long time (I have personally observed mating that lasted over an hour). During this time other warthog will come and nuzzle the female. It is not known why this is done.


  49. TerrytheTurtle says:

    I will say one thing about Clinton, he could multi-task. Now if only America could have a president who can watch football and eat pretzels at the same time.


  50. whiteyfresh says:

    AMEN B12!!-er, i mean CYANOCOBALAMIN!!!!

    :D


  51. Marcus Aurelius says:

    Clinton was getting a bj while talking to a congressman about our troops in Bosnia.

    Comment by Brassmask from 3DHS — August 6, 2007 @ 1:13 pm

    Understanding how humans hear is a complex subject involving the fields of physiology, psychology and acoustics.


  52. The Republic of Stupidity says:

    Care to comment on that (br)Assmask?

    Comment by hellinabucket — August 6, 2007 @ 1:11 pm

    But… but 57% of the troops in Iraq are Repubs! How can this be?


  53. RemoveBush says:

    He’s not the one who pledged to end the war. The Dems did, and they are leaving town for a month while the war wages on, son.

    Comment by Brassmask from 3DHS — August 6, 2007 @ 1:15 pm

    They have tried……

    They have submitted legislation left and right, but the Republicans do what they do best…… OBSTRUCT!!!!

    Go ahead and TRY to blame the Dems, but it’s the REPUBLICANS who are actually to blame…..

    When they actually stand up by what they speak, instead of saying one thing and VOTING another…… Then you have a leg to stand on!


  54. whiteyfresh says:

    Clinton was getting a bj while talking to a congressman about our troops in Bosnia.

    Comment by Brassmask from 3DHS — August 6, 2007 @ 1:13 pm

    that LUCKY S.O.B.!!!!

    ;)


  55. Brassmaskleftnut says:

    Why are you righties so consumed by bjs? Wait never mind, I forgot about the bj President george karl cheney has been given America.


  56. Zooey says:

    dirty,DIRTY wankers…
    :D
    Comment by whiteyfresh — August 6, 2007 @ 12:57 pm

    Hey whitey, how’s it going?


  57. Brassmaskleftnut says:

    RemoveBush: They are not Republicans (with a capital R), they are republics, (with a very small r).


  58. Brassmark'satotalloser says:

    In 2008, America will get 8 (hopefully 16) Freidman units.


  59. Pyrrho says:

    RemoveBush: They are not Republicans (with a capital R), they are republics, (with a very small r).

    Comment by Brassmaskleftnut — August 6, 2007 @ 1:24 pm
    ——————————————————

    This is the dumbest thing I have heard today.


  60. Notanotherstinkingtroll says:

    republics. republics. republics, repeat after me. Now, don’t you feel better.


  61. --Blue Girl says:

    You know, I have to counter further Assmask’s assertion that the military is overwhelmingly Republican.

    Every time that absolutely ignorant trope is trotted out again, remind the moron speaking about the KS-02 and the 2006 midterms. The KS-02 is home to both Ft. Riley and Ft. Leavenworth, and Democratic challenger Nancy Boyda defeated incumbent Republican Jim Ryun in a landslide.

    Now, you were saying?


  62. Zooey says:

    This is the dumbest thing I have heard today.
    Comment by Pyrrho — August 6, 2007 @ 1:27 pm

    You don’t read your own stuff, huh?


  63. Blueboy says:

    Zooey, you rock.


  64. The true blue vet says:

    Lets see eight days in Iraq qualifies you as an expert with their institute. I would agree to another six months if first these two numbnuts sign up today and taketheir positions outside the green zone. LIke the rest of their cohorts they have not served a single day. Michael Ware where are you?


  65. --Blue Girl says:

    One more thing…It has been a while since I took the service oath, but I didn’t recall any reference to the Republican Party as the object I was pledging loyalty and fidelity to, but being reality based, and prefering to deal in facts rather than fantasy, I went back and checked.

    I had not misremembered. The Republican Party is not mentioned even once in the service oath! It’s all about that most lefty of documents, the Constitution!!!


  66. toasterhead says:

    You don’t read your own stuff, huh?

    Comment by Zooey — August 6, 2007 @ 1:30 pm

    Zing!


  67. LibertyLover says:

    Woohoo. Another Friedman unit…


  68. LibertyLover says:

    Send them back for 6 more months in the green zone.


  69. tarazan says:

    7 more months…!!.

    Isn’t that what we were told in January.!


  70. margaret says:

    7 more months…!!.

    Isn’t that what we were told in January.!

    Comment by tarazan — August 6, 2007 @ 1:44 pm

    Odds on hearing it once again in Jan. ‘08? Very high is my guess.


  71. Zooey says:

    Comment by Blueboy — August 6, 2007 @ 1:32 pm
    Comment by toasterhead — August 6, 2007 @ 1:37 pm

    Thanks. :-)


  72. The Republic of Stupidity says:

    #

    republics. republics. republics, repeat after me. Now, don’t you feel better.

    Comment by Notanotherstinkingtroll — August 6, 2007 @ 1:29 pm

    Hey, hey, hey… you’re giving me a bad name here!


  73. The Republic of Stupidity says:

    #

    I call for another 7 months or so…. beat that libs!

    Comment by Mr. Peenis — August 6, 2007 @ 12:50 pm

    From your name, it appears that you’re beating it right now, which means, yes, you have beaten the libs to it. Thank god for samll favors.


  74. gorn by any other name says:

    “You really have no say in the matter. 56% of these troops are Republicans. Only 12% are Dem.” – Dr. Dog

    Last I checked, all 56% worked for the American people.

    Besides, we’re interested in protecting all the troops, even those who are mentally deficient.


  75. PaulD says:

    The war mongering powers that be have managed to muddy the argument to such an extent that the war is sustainable…. and for anyone who doubts that we are going into Iran, this DAILY SHOW clip might have you thinking otherwise

    VIDEO -
    http://beta.redlasso.com/Community/ClipPlayer.aspx?i=fb9fbee3-18b6-434a-9df6-3ad9bf49b6f1


  76. darla says:

    the funny thing is that, during the repub debate last w/e, giuliani actually said he was surprised (!) that the NYT had published this guy’s pro-surge op-ed (being a “liberal” paper and all).

    hey rudy, remember what the NYT was saying back in late 2002 and early 2003? still liberal, rudy? f*cking moron.


  77. Manuel says:

    As much as they want to stay the Neocon Repukes will shit their paints coming november, that’s why the Dems need to keep up the pressure.


  78. Mr Blifil says:

    Mr. O’Hanlon is well under the age of 40 it seems. If he agrees to conscript himself to the military for “nine months” or more, I am willing to give the surge more time, since it would raise the chances of him experiencing an untoward accident.


  79. Doc Hickory says:

    How come Doogie Howser O’Hanlon isn’t fighting in the ‘Most Important Battle in the History of Civilization’? He’s clearly old enough. When he says “we” need to give it another 6 months or so, what exactly does his participation entail?


  80. whiteyfresh says:

    Zooey:sorry-went to lunch…

    I’m doin’ groovaliciously!!!

    mY BIRTHDAY WAS YESTERDAY!!

    wheeeeeeeeeeeeeee!


  81. margaret says:

    Happy belated birthday whiteyfresh! Hope it was a good one.


  82. my too sense says:

    Maybe he means that’s six months in Dog years. So 1 to 7 ratio….that’d be 3.5 more years?


  83. Dick Durata says:

    All F.U.s automatically reboot within a pseudo-random time frame, it’s a feature, not a bug.


  84. whiteyfresh says:

    Comment by margaret — August 6, 2007 @ 2:48 pm

    Oh, god, it was fantastic-I went to a free dance party, got lots of hugs from pretty ladies, made my friends buy me drinkis….

    then came in to workat 7am on Sunday.(the dance party was on Saturday-the drinksstarted rolling in past midnight.)


  85. Roy Eidelson says:

    Warmongers often appeal to five core concerns—about issues of vulnerability, injustice, distrust, superiority, and helplessness—in order to galvanize public support for their agenda. I examine how Bush/Cheney and their neocon allies have used these particular appeals to promote the misguided and destructive Iraq war in a 10-minute online video entitled “Resisting the Drums of War” available for viewing HERE. Looking ahead, the continuing occupation of Iraq–or an attack on Iran–will likely be sold to us in much the same way.


  86. arroyo says:

    What the hell, why not 7 months, or even 9.75 months?

    Do these guys just make it up as they go?

    Yes.


  87. margaret says:

    Comment by whiteyfresh — August 6, 2007 @ 3:14 pm

    Sounds like fun! Good for you going around telling everyone it’s your b-day so you can collect hugs all night! That’s the spirit! They (psychologists) say that you need at least six hugs a day for good mental health. Work on Sunday must have been a bit tough though.

    Speaking of psychologists, Roy Eidelson, I’ll be sure to check out your video tonight! Thanks for sharing. Am I right about the hugs? : )


  88. Pompano Pete says:

    For those of you trying so hard to justify staying in Iraq by reminding folks that a million Vietnamese died after we left, I’d like to remind you the conditions on the ground were completely different. In Vietnam, the North had won decisively. They had the guns and the ammo. Armed resistance in the South had pretty much come to an end. Then the “reeducation camps” were opened and the killing began in earnest.

    In Iraq, all the factions are well armed and will continue to be after we leave. Bloodbaths don’t happen when both sides have guns and know how to use them.

    It really would be nice if some of you crazy wingers would read some serious history. Or, STFU.


  89. WaltTheMan says:

    Giuliani is carrying more bagage then a bellhop at a magician’s convention. If nominated, he will dcarry the Rupublic Party into oblivion.


  90. Com_n_sense says:

    Out of Iraq – GENERAL STRIKE SEPT. 11th!

    Buy nothing – do nothing – be you banker, baker, candle-stick maker. Stay home, go to the park. Bring this country to a standstill!

    BE HEARD! Pass it on.


  91. Probus says:

    It is immoral to give another 6 months to a policy (surge) that has failed. If it has already failed waiting six more months will make no difference. The surge was supposed to allow Maliki breathing room to make political concessions. Instead the Sunni members have left the parliament and the parliament has gone on vacation while we continue to lose more American lives every month. The surge has failed. We can no longer win this war militarily even Petraeus has said this. O’Hanlon and Pollack like Bush and Cheney want more time because they can’t admit how wrong the have been.


  92. ipod says:

    you can’t call yourself a think tank if all your ideas are stupid…..these guys have got to stop making predictions and offering advice and coming up with catch phrases like “the surge is working” and “last throes” and “if we leave they’ll follow us home”


  93. Martin Gifford says:

    Didn’t the pro-war groups in Vietnam say the same thing? another 6 months, lets give the South Vietnam government time to get it together, we will stand up, when they stand down?

    Comment by Krazny — August 6, 2007 @ 12:56 pm

    “Yeah, and we would have won in Vietnam if it wasn’t for the anti-war cowards and communist supporters.”

    …That’s how the argument goes. And that’s how the argument will go if the USA pulls out of Iraq.

    But the Democrats could always come up with an intelligent, constructive policy that builds moral authority instead of falling for the either/or simplism that the Republican’s present.


  94. Publicus says:

    “Out of Iraq – GENERAL STRIKE SEPT. 11th!”

    Com_n_sense:

    That is a GREAT idea! Except, I would make the demand FULL RESTORATION of our unalienable rights: habeas corpus, due process, warrants, and all that.

    Because it is our DUTY, according to the Declaration of Independence, to alter or abolish any government that is destructive of our rights. This is what patriots need to do.

    Can we get moveon.org or some other group to organize this?


  95. TC-14 says:

    6 months = 1 Friedman Unit “FU” = 2 Bohner Extensions


  96. Got Oil ? says:

    Woooo Hoooooo

    a bunch of Oil Stealing jack booted occupation amerikan stormtroopers got all blowed up in Iraq today !!!

    Surge This, amerika !!!

    Fight On Iraqi Freedom Fighters !!!

    Exterminate and slaughter the kkkhristian crusading invaders and occupiers !!!!

    choke on that Oil amerika !!!!


  97. Probus says:

    Comment by Got Oil ? — August 7, 2007 @ 12:02 am

    Any comments that deride the sacrifice and service of our troops should be condemned in the strongest terms.


  98. PaulD says:

    Speaking of progress / setbacks in Iraq and the Patreus report, here is what defense secretary Robert Gates has to say about the recent troubles in Iraq

    VIDEO – Meet The Press / Robert Gates
    http://beta.redlasso.com/Community/ClipPlayer.aspx?i=43687bf9-4c8d-4ea9-a421-9ab1158ba2f2



Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2009 Center for American Progress Action Fund
View Most Popular

Advertisement

What We're About

Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report



imageTopic Cloud


Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
Reports


Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll