Comments on: Chris Matthews’ incisive post-debate commentary.

By: j swift

j swift — Wed, 08 Aug 2007 15:23:57 +0000

what the hell is wrong with matthews?

It is hard to ask campaign-relevant questions with lips attached to the Republican Party’s ass.

By: Marie

Marie — Wed, 08 Aug 2007 14:33:02 +0000

I have sent another email to dan abrams of msnbc – and copied hardball — what the hell is wrong with matthews?

By: bernarda

bernarda — Wed, 08 Aug 2007 14:00:03 +0000

It is far too late for Chris Matthews to grow either a brain or balls.

By: underdog

underdog — Wed, 08 Aug 2007 13:22:21 +0000

Breaking news: Tweety is a shallow arse.

By: Jericho

Jericho — Wed, 08 Aug 2007 11:23:26 +0000

Yeah, where does Mss. Clinton get off using the word ‘girl’, how rude. On the other hand, Bush has every right to speak of supporting the troops, sacrifice, effort, propaganda, political tactics and military service. How can one keep a sensible mind in a country as whacked as this. And to think I wanted to live there…, no way, JosÃ©.

By: cage free brown

cage free brown — Wed, 08 Aug 2007 06:29:19 +0000

I leaped from my chair and nearly dislocated a shoulder to avoid hearing Chris Matthews. I’m a big boy. I don’t need that goon telling me what I just saw and how I feel about it.

The fact that the candidates needed to use their “outside voices” was a nice addition. the fact that the stadium was full of fully operational bullshit detectors was even nicer.

what happened to Gravel? I would have enjoyed seeing him on board. the primary is the time to focus on issues. go, take one of those cool little polls. I’ll bet most of the snotty “netroots” people who think Gravel and Kucinich should be cast overboard actually agree with them on most of the issues. some of you people are even starting to sound like Chris Matthews!

By: Nicholas of Cusa

Nicholas of Cusa — Wed, 08 Aug 2007 06:15:42 +0000

All of their candidates are white. None of them can be described as talented or worthy of the presidency.

Comment by Probus â€” August 8, 2007 @ 2:11 am
—————————

Don’t forget “male.” And it is precisely that fact (that Republican candidates are white males) that will lead to a Republican victory!!!

By: Probus

Probus — Wed, 08 Aug 2007 06:11:18 +0000

I am impressed with all the Democrats vying for the Democratic nomination. Any one of them would make a thousand timeâ€™s better president than George W. Bush. Hell, Barney the White House wonder dog would make a better president than Bush.

Comment by The Oracle â€” August 8, 2007 @ 2:05 am

Indeed we truly have a diverse and talented set of candidates to choose from. For the first time we might nominate a woman, an African American or even a Hispanic to the highest office. The republicans can make no such claim. All of their candidates are white. None of them can be described as talented or worthy of the presidency.

By: The Oracle

The Oracle — Wed, 08 Aug 2007 06:05:27 +0000

As soon as I saw who were the talking heads on MSNBC’s post-debate program, I turned the channel. Pat Buchanan?!?!? And with Chris Matthews up to his same-o same-o hackery, I figured there must be something better on television.

The debate itself was great.

I am impressed with all the Democrats vying for the Democratic nomination. Any one of them would make a thousand time’s better president than George W. Bush. Hell, Barney the White House wonder dog would make a better president than Bush.

By: Zooey

Zooey — Wed, 08 Aug 2007 06:04:19 +0000

Always nice to see you. Goodnight, Juan. :)

By: Juan C

Juan C — Wed, 08 Aug 2007 06:00:35 +0000

Zoo, Im off. NIce reading you here.

Take care, scout girl. ;)

By: Zooey

Zooey — Wed, 08 Aug 2007 05:57:50 +0000

However, Zoo is allow to do whatever she wants. :D
Heh.
Comment by Juan C â€” August 8, 2007 @ 1:55 am

No, BB is right. I just don’t appreciate being singled out. :}

By: Juan C

Juan C — Wed, 08 Aug 2007 05:55:27 +0000

However, Zoo is allow to do whatever she wants. :D

Heh.

By: Juan C

Juan C — Wed, 08 Aug 2007 05:54:37 +0000

I think bilbobaggins has a point.

While some rebuttals to trolls contain a lot of useful information, some others are not and tend to endorse irrelevant troll posting. I cant understand why is there so much fascination from some of the regulars here about some trolls (Jake, Mr. P) that have absolutely nothing valuable to comment on.

By: Probus

Probus — Wed, 08 Aug 2007 05:54:20 +0000

Comment by bilbobaggins â€” August 8, 2007 @ 1:13 am

You are right. The trolls would not come here if no one engaged them. I just ignore them.

By: Zooey

Zooey — Wed, 08 Aug 2007 05:26:22 +0000

Iâ€™m off to Daily Kos where they actually have conversations and donâ€™t play with trolls.
Comment by bilbobaggins â€” August 8, 2007 @ 1:13 am

Yeah, whatever.

By: bilbobaggins

bilbobaggins — Wed, 08 Aug 2007 05:13:11 +0000

“Stop spamming this thread with your racist idiocy, Pee Brain.
Comment by Zooey”

Stop encouraging them. What is wrong with you people. Do you really think you are going to accomplish anything by arguing with a troll? They are here simply to disrupt this site and they do a marvelous job of it with the assistance of many TP posters. I am beginning to think that you all really enjoy it. Would you be bored if there were no trolls here to play with?

I’m off to Daily Kos where they actually have conversations and don’t play with trolls.

By: muzz

muzz — Wed, 08 Aug 2007 04:14:51 +0000

and why the hell does Matthews have Pat Buchanan give his goofy evaluation of everything? I tried to wait for KO after the debate was over, but couldn’t stand it and went out and cut the lawn.

By: The Republic of Stupidity

The Republic of Stupidity — Wed, 08 Aug 2007 03:38:04 +0000

Come on Nicky boy, we know your family secret, your granny was Dutch!

Comment by RUCerious â€” August 7, 2007 @ 10:19 pm

He rode a blazing saddle…

By: null

null — Wed, 08 Aug 2007 03:27:46 +0000

What happens to Neocons when the bulb goes out?
They have sex behind each others back