Right-Wing Media Give Favorable Platform To ‘Another 9/11′ Columnist
Right-Wing Media Give Favorable Platform To ‘Another 9/11′ Columnist
In his Thursday column, Philadelphia Daily News scribe Stu Bykofsky seemingly wished for the tragic death of 3000+ Americans when he wrote that “another 9/11 would help America.”
A host of right-wing media outlets provided Bykofsky a national platform yesterday that largely served to give credence to the columnist’s ghoulish suggestion.
Drudge gave the article a top row, center column link:
Radio host Mike Gallagher, who claims to have “over 3.75 million weekly listeners” across the country, hosted Bykofsky (on the very same day that he scored an interview with Rudy Giuliani):
Bykofsky’s biggest booster, however, was Fox News. Yesterday morning’s Fox and Friends did a segment on his column. Later in the afternoon, Bykofsky appeared on The Big Story, where host John Gibson agreed with and validated Bykofsky’s thesis. “I think it’s going to take a lot of dead people to wake America up,” said Gibson. Watch it:
The Bush administration used the events of 9/11 to launch an unnecessary war, curtail the rights of Americans, torture, illegally spy, and violate the Constitution. The right-wing can’t wait for “another 9/11″ so they can take it to the next level.
Sort Comments By: Top Rated | Date
I’m confused as to what America needs to wake up from.
Despite mistrust from most Americans, Bush/Cheney are still getting their way with virtually every damned thing that they want.
What more do they need?
Oh yeah, I forgot… they want war with Iran.
That’s what this is all about, isn’t it?
August 11th, 2007 at 8:15 amNow we know who the real America-haters are, and they are quite clear about it. Right-wing, conservative media are the true enemies of patiotic Americans, wishing wholesale death and destruction here at home so they can advance their Stalinist agendas. This is a real wake-up call for the patriotic left, the founders of this country, and true owners, to do all in our power to shut down the treasonous poison of those that wish harm on America just to prove the point that they are, in fact, Nazis. tey have just given up their right to tout the 1st Amendment, and if we don’t stop them, they will work with foreign terrorists to bring about the destruction of the country. Treason and sedition are alive and well on FOX noise, and it’s time to get serious about taking back our freedoms before these scumsuckers destroy it in the name of greed and power. They have exposed themselves clearly and willingly, and should now be considered targets.
August 11th, 2007 at 8:18 amAnother 3000 dead?
A few more fallen bridges ought to do the trick.
August 11th, 2007 at 8:20 amthe more desperate the more horrific the verbiage!
August 11th, 2007 at 8:21 amI commented about Bykofsky’s column on another liberal blog and somebody from Pa. told me “don’t worry about it. Bykofsky is just a gossip columnist”.
August 11th, 2007 at 8:22 amWrong.
He just said out loud what most of these crazies are thinking and they will use that as a jumping off point.
You know the “some people say” brand of journalism.
Bykofsky is nothing more than Fred Phelps with a newspaper column.
August 11th, 2007 at 8:25 amIf this does not embolden the “enemy”, I dont know what it is.
sept, 2001. Inside job. MOre clear than ever.
August 11th, 2007 at 8:25 amBTW, how favorable has the outcome been for the alleged perpetrators of 911, and the Arab world in general?
Does it make sense for them to attack us again, from their point of view?
What will they gain? Other than the inevitable destruction of Iran, which will obviously be blamed for the attack, whether they are behind it or not. The same way that Iraq was blamed for an attack that was perpetrated by mostly Saudis.
NONE of it makes ANY sense whatsoever… if you listen to the “official” story.
Our country is going to be in serious trouble, very soon, but not for the reasons these whack jobs expound upon.
Get prepared folks… before it’s too late.
August 11th, 2007 at 8:26 amOh, and BTW, more than 50 percent of the foreign insurgents in Iraq are Saudi, not Iranian.
Anybody see a pattern forming here?
August 11th, 2007 at 8:29 amso if this guy “wished” for a second 911 then who “wished” for the first one ?
August 11th, 2007 at 8:34 amAnother Al-Qaeda attack will energize America?
August 11th, 2007 at 8:35 amWhy on earth would it do that, if if Osama Bin Laden ’s going to get away with it like he did the last one?
Obviously a second attack on the heels of this nonsense will be perpetrated by neocons, again. 5 in the noggin for Gibson.
August 11th, 2007 at 8:35 amCould it be any clearer that the Right is aiding and abetting Al Qaeda? They have lost all claim to patriotism. I will fight to destroy the GOP forever.
August 11th, 2007 at 8:38 amonce again, the coordinated appearances of this insane columnist did not just suddenly materialize out of thin air following the publishing of his column… that many appearances, just like for o’hanlon and pollock, cannot be organized on the fly, they HAVE to be carefully scheduled in advance… what i want to know, is who is this guy’s “angel…” my hunch is karl rove…
And, yes, I DO take it personally
August 11th, 2007 at 8:38 ambut they need to make it looks real this time , no more bullet proof saudie passports falling from the sky or cell phones work on 30000 f high
August 11th, 2007 at 8:43 amInteresting how both neo-cons and OBL both approve of terror to achieve political objectives.
August 11th, 2007 at 9:06 amonce again, the coordinated appearances of this insane columnist did not just suddenly materialize out of thin air following the publishing of his column… that many appearances, just like for o’hanlon and pollock, cannot be organized on the fly, they HAVE to be carefully scheduled in advance… what i want to know, is who is this guy’s “angel…†my hunch is karl rove…
Comment by profmarcus
I totally agree with you on this one.
August 11th, 2007 at 9:18 amYes, CONTURDS are, f’ing CRAZY.
Aliens- not of ‘this earth’. Look at John Gibson- he’s not human.
Besides, CONTURDS- you managed to get almost 4000 GOOD-’Merkins killed in Eye-rack, isn’t that enough for your sick, sick bloodlust?.
August 11th, 2007 at 9:23 amIt’s time for ‘Matt’ to be reassigned to cleaning duty before the ABA arrives to crap on this blog for being unconstitutional slander against the United States of America.
August 11th, 2007 at 9:24 amI’m confused.
For years, the boast of the Bush Administration and its supporters was “There haven’t been any more terrorist attacks since 9-11 thanks to the Bush Administration.” It was their boast of success and competence
Given such a boast, one would think that the implication of another terrorist attack would be that we now had proof positive that the Bush Administration was a complete failure.
But in the crazy, illogical and irrational world of these nutsos, they NOW WELCOME another terrorist attack. And should such occur, they and their allies in the corporate media, will once again try to use it to their advantage by calling for more “Sieg Hiels” for the Chimp.
In their complete lack of consistency and intellectual integrity, these people have absolutely no shame, and will stoop to ANY depth to get people to support their way.
August 11th, 2007 at 9:28 amMike Luckovich’s political cartoon says it all….Bin Laden in a cave saying ” we must attack America’s infrastructure before it collapses.”
August 11th, 2007 at 9:28 amCan anyone imagine if this guy said anything like this 6 years ago?
Now they say things that are not just insane but could only come a mind soaked with sewage kept in a steaming hot dumpster long enough to form words.
How can this be news?Is this a slug fest of mindless matter?
August 11th, 2007 at 9:32 amSomeone better get a grip before some idiot thinks this is a good idea.
Jeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeez
You guys in the media are playing with fire.
reporting treason by the ratwing media is patriotism, not slander. matt is a hero, and uncovering the right’s hatred of Americans is very important work, as it will lead to the destruction of the GOP, and the return of freedom and democracy to America. If you don’t like it, CT, move to North Korea, where they share your views.
August 11th, 2007 at 9:34 amProof posative this bunch and their followers are not christian’s…This must be the insane fringe in our society….Sadly all the mental hospital’s are now closed…..Blessings
August 11th, 2007 at 9:37 amComment by ronjazz — August 11, 2007 @ 9:34 am
Only confirming the problem with crazy liberals: seeking to alter the demographics of what the few of them don’t see fit, and the majority of those who don’t like their moonbat agenda (as an intelligent person shouldn’t) can “move to North Korea.”
You’re biting the hand that feeds you, sir. Your prospective dictatorship is what U.S. forces are working to prevent — also that of an Islamic takeover of this country.
August 11th, 2007 at 9:42 amWhat Americans need is to be aware.
Whatch this movie.
This should be a good start. Raise awareness.
http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com/
August 11th, 2007 at 9:43 am“Watch this movie”
August 11th, 2007 at 9:44 amhttp://www.zeitgeistmovie.com/
I detect the glint of tinfoil on this thread.
August 11th, 2007 at 9:48 amComment by Sharon — August 11, 2007 @ 9:37 am
Shouldn’t you rail against the ideological extremes in Iraq, thumping their bibles and sporting their rags, who kill innocent women and children?
That’s right, I’m talking about your “innocent” and “beloved” Muslims. I’m sure a sane venting in response to the U.S. “invasion” is, strap bombs to your back and randomly blow up women and children.
I’m sure your response will be another crazy talking-point — i.e., our brave military forces are “turning them into meanie pantsies.”
August 11th, 2007 at 9:49 amThere isn’t a conservative blog that didn’t skewer this guy over that column.
But that’s not the point, is it? The point is that the left has the “moral authority” to criticize this guy but not the right. And when lefty blogs write about this idiot, they are doing the world a favor but when conservatives castigate the fellow, they are “encouraging” him and the idea.
This may be the biggest stretch you guys have ever made to criticize the right.
Pretty dumb.
August 11th, 2007 at 9:51 amSharon: Shouldn’t you rail against the ideological extremes in Iraq, thumping their bibles and sporting their rags, who kill innocent women and children?
Naturally we hate the traitors within America much more than any enemies on the outside.
August 11th, 2007 at 9:52 amComment by CT_Version 2 — August 11, 2007 @ 9:49 am
CT There we NO Terrorist attacks in Iraq before our Invasion. ZERO
August 11th, 2007 at 9:55 amI’m not sure how Drudge linking to him is somehow wrong. Atrios did the same thing; it was all over the news, everyone was talking about/linking to it.
Gibson is a tool though. I loved it when Olbermann chewed him out the other day.
August 11th, 2007 at 10:02 amIt has already been foretold. The next “terrorist” attack will come in the form of a mushroom cloud.
Ironic, the only thing preventing this “terrorist” attack may well be the fact that impeachment is off the table.
August 11th, 2007 at 10:03 amSo, all of those people leaping from the Twin Towers and all of those firemen, police officers and office workers who suffocated, burned and were crushed that day, their sacrifice was for George Bush and the Republican Party? The Republican party now wants another sacrifice?
August 11th, 2007 at 10:09 amIt is a death cult.
There isn’t a conservative blog that didn’t skewer this guy over that column.
But that’s not the point, is it?
No, that’s not the point. The point is that a right wing radio host and Fox News couldn’t wait to give public exposure to this guy’s sick ideas.
And I’m guessing none of your conservative blogs pointed out this fact, though I’d be happy to be proven wrong.
August 11th, 2007 at 10:11 amI had a friend who turned into a winger and he said: “America needs a Beslan(Russian/Chechnyan hostage mass killing)style attack in America so that everyone wakes up and realizeds the threat of Islamic terrorists”.
It is pretty scary but this seems to be a pretty deep feeling among the 26%-ers.
-GSD
August 11th, 2007 at 10:14 amShouldn’t you rail against the ideological extremes in Iraq, thumping their bibles and sporting their rags, who kill innocent women and children? Comment by CT_Version 2 — August 11, 2007 @ 9:49 am
Umm…CT, exactly which version of the Bible are they thumping? And shouldn’t you rail against those “sporting their rags” who actually attacked us? And therefore, shouldn’t you rail against an unjustified war against those who didn’t?
August 11th, 2007 at 10:20 am#31 when lefty blogs write about this idiot, they are doing the world a favor but when conservatives castigate the fellow, they are “encouraging†him and the idea.
What “castigating”? Gibson agreed with him that it’s going to take more dead Americans before people “wake up”.
“Wake up” and do what? Give the Führer unlimited powers?
August 11th, 2007 at 10:23 am“I think it’s going to take a lot of dead people to wake America up,†said Gibson. “
The only thing another 911 would wake Americans up to is the complete and utter failure of the Bush Administration.
Bush and his vanity war in Iraq is responsible for the creation of thousands of new al Quaeda types around the world who are furious with us for interfering in the middle east.
Bush has done nothing to increase the protections for this country. He has not implemented the 911 recommendations, he has not increased port security, and he HAS weakened us by taking our National Guard (you know, the people who are supposed to protect us here at home) out of our country and putting them into Iraq.
If Bush thinks another 911 is going to help him and his party, I think he is sadly mistaken. He has already failed to protect us once, another failure will be the end of Bush and the Republicans.
August 11th, 2007 at 10:23 amDemocrats, the party of retreat and defeat.
August 11th, 2007 at 10:24 am“what i want to know, is who is this guy’s “angel…†my hunch is karl rove…”
Or, Rupert Murdoch.
August 11th, 2007 at 10:26 amIs it possible to file an FCC complaint over this? In terms of obscenity, I say Super Bowl boobies don’t begin to compare to advocating for the death of thousands of Americans.
I guess in GOPer households the conversation with little Johnny goes like this:
(Super Bowl boobie exposed): Turn away Johnny don’t look at that woman’s disgusting exposed breast…
(Watching Fox News Advocate for murdering Americans):
Johnny, did you hear that? That’s a wonderful idea to get all of America to support our wonderful, God sent, President George Bush. Some American’s just need to die so we can all share God’s vision.
Am i getting warm here? Are GOPers really this crazy?
August 11th, 2007 at 10:30 amThe right has the nerve to say that we are “blame America first liberals,” that we crave defeat in Iraq and welcome every bit of bad news out of the occupation. Not true at all, and quite offensive, but they say it a lot.
And then here they are, WISHING for another 9-11.
Worst. Hypocrites. Ever.
.
August 11th, 2007 at 10:33 am“arrives to crap on this blog for being unconstitutional slander against the United States of America.
Comment by CT_Version 2″
Ok asshat, tell me how expressing my constitutionally guaranteed rights to free speech is “unconstitutional slander”. Gawd, you are such an intellectual midget.
August 11th, 2007 at 10:33 amAmerica doesn’t need “another 9-11″ it needs leadership. Sadly, Bush and the GOP have failed America in leadership. Another 9-11 would mean the end of the already flailing conservative experiment.
August 11th, 2007 at 10:34 amComment by Different Matt — August 11, 2007 @ 10:20 am
They are thumping the bible of Islamofascism. Who would need an explanation besides a lefty? Really, what bible did you believe them to be thumping?
This is in no way an “unjustified war.” Put up some real evidence to support your talking-points, please. The U.S. went in to exterminate evil Sadaam and his minions, to rebuild Iraq into a functional democracy. Yet it seems that fellow Iraqis are looking to join in on the fight and further Sadaam’s legacy, looking for a fight when we’re looking to help them help themselves after the years of oppression and torture they’ve endured.
You just have to repeat the lousy, condemned Vietnam speak, don’t you? Hippies didn’t exactly go down in the history books as well regarded.
Like it or not, the history books will vindicate this President, while you lefties will fight for failure in hopes that it doesn’t happen.
August 11th, 2007 at 10:34 am“Shouldn’t you rail against the ideological extremes in Iraq, thumping their bibles and sporting their rags, who kill innocent women and children?Comment by CT_Version 2″
Funny, I don’t see you railing against our government why is killing innocent women and children on a daily basis. Why is it OK for our military to kill the innocent and it is not OK for the insurgents to kill innocent women and children. The fact of the matter is that it is NEVER OK to kill innocents. That’s why I applaud Obama for having the courage to say that for him as president, nuclear strikes are off the table.
August 11th, 2007 at 10:36 amBilbo,
another failure will be blamed on the Democratic controlled Congress, for failing to give Bush even more authority to spy on U.S. citizens.
another failure will be used to point out the need for even more surveillance, even fewer civil liberties.
another failure will be used to reinstate the draft.
another failure will be the excuse needed to invade Iran.
another failure will mean hundreds of billions of dollars of profits to the War Industry.
and I would be willing to bet, after another “failure” Bush will haul out a “mastermind” from a black site and claim that he had knowledge of the attack, but we couldn’t get it from him because Bush was hamstrung by not being allowed to use “coercive interrogation techniques” on him.
another failure will result in a nation-wide “national emergency” and martial law, with the consolidation of legislative and judicial functions within the Executive Branch. The “national emergency” will last until the War on Terror is over. We will continually be asked to endure for another six months…and another…and another….
August 11th, 2007 at 10:38 amChicken Hawks flying so high in the sky.
August 11th, 2007 at 10:40 amfootsore
But that’s not the point, is it? The point is that the left has the “moral authority†to criticize this guy but not the right. And when lefty blogs write about this idiot, they are doing the world a favor but when conservatives castigate the fellow, they are “encouraging†him and the idea. Comment by Rick Moran
What??? You are saying that the right has been criticizing this guy? Then why is this article pointing out that he has been treated as a hero by the right? Why does John Gibson agree with what he has to say? Are you living in an alternative reality where black is white? Please show me where this article shows that the conservatives are castigating this guy.
August 11th, 2007 at 10:41 amYou’ve already provided the real evidence. Wars of Aggression for regime change violate the U.N. Charter.
Since the United States is a member of the U.N. by treaty, and since Treaties are part of the Supreme Law of the Land under the Constitution, the Iraq War is illegal.
August 11th, 2007 at 10:45 amComment by bilbobaggins — August 11, 2007 @ 10:36 am
STOP slandering U.S. forces. Do not live in this country if you don’t appreciate their efforts.
It’s funny how you decide to criticize U.S. forces before anybody else in this fight; before the actual terrorists who remain a threat to our nation.
You, sir, are a despicable American. Yet, you’ll go to any length to spin your words to somehow be “Pro-American.” This nation can see right through you.
August 11th, 2007 at 10:45 am“Like it or not, the history books will vindicate this President, while you lefties will fight for failure in hopes that it doesn’t happen.”
Dream on sweet dreamer.
August 11th, 2007 at 10:46 am…so they can take it to the next level.
good lord, what level is THAT???
what more do “they” want???
do i want to know?
ugh.
August 11th, 2007 at 10:47 amLike it or not, the history books will vindicate this President, while you lefties will fight for failure in hopes that it doesn’t happen.
Comment by CT_Version 2 — August 11, 2007 @ 10:34 am
No they won’t. See how dumb declaritive statements based upon future events are?
August 11th, 2007 at 10:49 amCould you imagine the reaction of Right Wing media if a “Librul” had wished for another 9-11?
August 11th, 2007 at 10:49 am“STOP slandering U.S. forces. Do not live in this country if you don’t appreciate their efforts.”
I am not slandering US forces. I am slandering the people who put them there and told them what to do. That is George Bush and all the Generals he has hand picked to do his dirty deed. The only “crime” the US forces have committed is following the orders that were given to them. The problem is, if they don’t follow the orders, they really will be committing a crime.
I guess you missed the part of my post where I said that the truth is it is NEVER ok to kill innocents. You seem to think that it is. How christian of you.
As I said before, you are an intellectual midget.
August 11th, 2007 at 10:51 amSTOP slandering U.S. forces.
Biblo didn’t slander GIs. You should stop smearing those who honestly disagree with our inept and willfully ignorant political leaders. George Bush’s “war on terror” is a failure, even on his own terms: incidents of terrorism, rather than declining, are increasing. Explain to us again how the US will win the hearts and minds of the Middle East by killing civilians (min est: 60,000; max est: 600,000).
August 11th, 2007 at 10:53 amMaybe you’ve forgotten, but the “justification” for this war was WMDs; remember the “mushroom cloud” speech? If we’re going to war on the basis of removing dictatorships, shall we invade, say, Saudi Arabia? North Korea? Whaddaya think, CT? The fact is that was only the justification AFTER we invaded and WMDs weren’t turning up.
And America does need to wake up. That includes you, CT.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/ comment/ story/ 0,3604,1270414,00.html
August 11th, 2007 at 10:54 amClearly they must destroy the nation in order to save it.
August 11th, 2007 at 10:56 amYou just have to repeat the lousy, condemned Vietnam speak, don’t you? Hippies didn’t exactly go down in the history books as well regarded.
Maybe not but they went down in the history books as being right.
August 11th, 2007 at 10:57 amNow quit derailing the thread, troll. It is about the sense of needing another catastrophic event to unite this country.
Got anything on that?
Then STFU.
Comment NOT by veritas — August 11, 2007 @ 10:24 am
chicken shite name jacker.
August 11th, 2007 at 10:58 amCT_Version 2 has been reading very special history books, where hippies are “not well regarded”, Islamic terrorists thump the Bible, the Iraq War was fought to “to exterminate evil Sadaam and his minions, to rebuild Iraq into a functional democracy”, and foreign policy failures are vindicated.
I think we’re dealing with someone who rides the short bus to school.
August 11th, 2007 at 10:58 amAs I said before, you are an intellectual midget.
Comment by bilbobaggins — August 11, 2007 @ 10:51 am
And what you say doesn’t stick, because as a lefty you don’t have a record of being accurate.
Your words slandered the troops of the United States. I guess you missed my point when I said that you take the first step at slandering them (the few of them who may have committed crimes in the battlefield) before knocking the vicious terrorists who far out number any possibly offending troops. Shouldn’t you be filling this board with clear admonishment for our enemies?
Why do you jump at the chance to take jabs at the good guys?
August 11th, 2007 at 10:58 amFascist Pigs
August 11th, 2007 at 11:00 amWhy do you jump at the chance to take jabs at the good guys?
Why are so hell-bent on defending your Fearless Leader’s record of total failure?
August 11th, 2007 at 11:03 am“Shouldn’t you be filling this board with clear admonishment for our enemies?”
I do that on a regular basis. Unfortunately our enemy is our government. I am more afraid of my own government than I am of the “terrorists”.
August 11th, 2007 at 11:03 amComment by dbadass — August 11, 2007 @ 10:49 am
Then why do you idiot lefties proclaim that GW Bush shouldn’t have his own Presidential Library? Why proclaim the U.S. will lose no-matter- what in Iraq?
And take this declarative statement –
Dream on sweet dreamer.
Comment by bilbobaggins — August 11, 2007 @ 10:46 am
There’s odd, projective thought, with little evidence put into the that. It’s his simple political party disdain doing the talking.
August 11th, 2007 at 11:04 amComment by CT_Version 2 — August 11, 2007 @ 11:04 am
Diverting the topic with nothing to say!
August 11th, 2007 at 11:08 amgop plan for permanent one party rule: let terrorist murder thousands (maybe millions if we’re lucky) of americans.
a nazi plan for a nazi party.
any support for this insanity? well there’s fox, right wing radio and, of course, the trolls here are loving it!
August 11th, 2007 at 11:09 amgop plan for permanent one party rule: let terrorist murder thousands (maybe millions if we’re lucky) of americans.
a nazi plan for a nazi party.
any support out there for this insanity? well there’s fox, right wing radio and, of course, the trolls here are loving it!
August 11th, 2007 at 11:11 amGo look at this picture of Gallagher, all dressed up in his Sky King outfit, for a “on his knees, mano y mano,” love session, with Gunga Din Bush!
August 11th, 2007 at 11:13 amleftthought.blogspot.com/2005/08/mike-gallagher-again.html
Gibson is a dip-shit. The Iraq war has not divided America; George Bush has divided America.
August 11th, 2007 at 11:13 amWhy do you jump at the chance to take jabs at the good guys?
Comment by CT_Version 2 — August 11, 2007 @ 10:58 am
Hint: in the World’s eyes, Americans are not the good guys.
August 11th, 2007 at 11:15 amThen why do you idiot lefties proclaim that GW Bush shouldn’t have his own Presidential Library?
For chrissake, who gives a damn.
Why proclaim the U.S. will lose no-matter-what in Iraq?
Because, except to the reality-challenged wingnuts, it is unwinnable. Tell us again how the US can win the hearts and minds of the Arab Street by heedlessly slaughtering civilians?
August 11th, 2007 at 11:17 amany support for this insanity? well there’s fox, right wing radio and, of course, the trolls here are loving it!
And that is the problem. This story is not controversial (what Bykofsky wrote) it is what the media has done to distort it. That’s the story.
August 11th, 2007 at 11:18 amTrolls need no encouragement in embracing a far right philosophy. They can take any story on any topic and divert it to the RWTP (right wing talking points); even, and maybe especially, when the topic has no relation whatsoever to their talking point.
Those should not be addressed. If you confront them, the trolls win, no matter how valid your point is, they are not listening. They are pushing your buttons, and, tempting as it is, maybe you should not let them.
Troll identification is fairly simple. If they whip out a totally off topic non sequitur, then it’s a troll. If they change the subject or ask you for proof (demand it) it’s a troll.
They should not be acknowledged (get their email address, give them yours, and argue amongst yourselves)
Isn’t this thread about Drudge perpetuating Bykofsky’s disgusting call for terrorism in this country?
Why is anyone even responding to that sad, uneducated, frightened child CT_Version 2?
August 11th, 2007 at 11:22 amCT_V2 you are just as stupid as CT_V1. You are a moron, and a sheeple, go suck Bush’s a$$. You are the exact type of scum that this country needs to be killed in a terrorist attack.
August 11th, 2007 at 11:23 amI wish that all the conservatives would get in a small area and then the mushroom cloud of doom on you all.
This looks like a calculated floating of a goulish idea. If the backlash isn’t loud and clear, the reichwing will see it as an opportunity and a false flag becomes more likely.
Martial law anyone? Elections canceled in the name of national security?
As was pointed out, it does kick the legs out from the excuse that Bush has kept us safe, but people will be scrambling and so terrified that will be lost in the kaos.
August 11th, 2007 at 11:25 amIn their fevered imaginations, the wingnuts seem to think that another domestic terror incident will in some way validate Bush’s failed anti-terror strategy? Why? On the contrary, it would highlight Bush’s failure to make Americans safer, and how Bush’s willfully ignorant, reflexively belligerent policy has increased terrorism instead of reducing it.
August 11th, 2007 at 11:27 amIf anything, this proves that the right-wingers never had any intention of winning the war against terrorists and in fact need them to stoke their own fearmongering, cowardly bloodlust and line the pockets of fat cat defense contractors.
Absolutely abhorrent. Go away, you fearful people who lack the capacity to reason. You’ve done enough damage to our country. SHAME SHAME SHAME ON YOU!
- Tom
August 11th, 2007 at 11:31 amIf Gibby is so lib about another strike, then how about taking one for the team, John. When you get the memo, park your fat ass at projected ground zero and send yourself to martyrdom.
#9 makes a good point also. There’s no question the bad guys would like to hit us again, but I don’t think right now is the time. We’re in their back yard. It would provide a justification for going into northern Pakistan in earnest, but it won’t further the neocon plan for attacking Iran and the “fight them there so we don’t have to fight them here” goes right out the window.
August 11th, 2007 at 11:33 amArthur,
remember who controls the media and the message.
also, factor in the fact that intelligent, thinking people, are a distinct minority.
Man-unkind will be the first specie on Earth to cause its own extinction.
August 11th, 2007 at 11:34 amCT another paid rightwing shill, ever embarrassing and reducing America’s standing in the world,when all that you do is protect incompetence,lies and failure–you and your 26%’ers are America’s real enemies!
August 11th, 2007 at 11:38 amThis from a guy (Gibson) who likes to look at Internet pics of a shirtless Danny Bonaduce and invite him on his show to discuss it with him.
August 11th, 2007 at 11:43 amso if this guy “wished†for a second 911 then who “wished†for the first one ?
Comment by Hannipal — August 11, 2007 @ 8:34 am
———-
See newamericancentury.org
In verifying the address for the site (I thought it was pnac.org), this caught my eye:
The Project for the New American Century is a non-profit educational organization dedicated to a few fundamental propositions: that American leadership is good both for America and for the world…
So what if others in the world don’t agree? Yep…fck ‘em.
August 11th, 2007 at 11:48 amNotice how right wingers are always wont to wish for death in order to achieve one of their goals?
August 11th, 2007 at 11:52 amOxyCon @ 90,
I’ve noticed that, and I’m surprised to see it here as well. Many of the comments here are quite sick and stupid.
August 11th, 2007 at 11:56 amSorry for the duplication….my bad.
August 11th, 2007 at 12:00 pmComment by The Chimp’s Underwear — August 11, 2007 @ 9:28 am
Remember the old saying that if the economy is doing well, Republicans take credit and if it is doing poorly, the Dems get blamed? You know, like how the great economy during Clinton’s two terms were credited to the actions of Bush Sr. when he was in office (never mind that Dems had control of Congress during the same term, not to mention Reagan’s).
I believe the same thinking is going on here. No terrorist attacks mean Bush is doing a heck of a job. But should we get attacked again, the Dems will be front and center in the blame. Remember Bush and the other Repubs saying if Dems win a majority in Congress in 2006, it will be a victory for the terrorists. Remember that Repubs have been piling on the Dems for discussing & suggesting withdrawal options from Iraq, saying that it helps the enemy. They have their scapegoat.
August 11th, 2007 at 12:02 pmLimbaugh’s demographic
[…]
A neighbor said, “Every day he’s out there. He never goes into the house. He sleeps out there, he eats out there, he watches TV, he plays guitar…. Everything that you do in your house, he does out there.â€
Graham acknowledges that he spends most of his time in his car, but says there’s a reason.
An extension cord runs from the house to the car, providing power for a 13-inch TV that rests in the passenger seat, an oscillating fan and a radio.
“I get better reception there than I do in there,†he said, pointing at the house. “I listen to Rush (Limbaugh) every day just about.â€
http://www.crooksandliars.com/
August 11th, 2007 at 12:04 pm.
A little off-topic, but for those of you having problems using the HTML buttons above the comment section (I did, using IE 7 and Windows Vista) may try using the Firefox browser instead. I installed it last night and it restored the functions of the buttons.
http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/
August 11th, 2007 at 12:04 pmIt would provide a justification for going into northern Pakistan in earnest, but it won’t further the neocon plan for attacking Iran and the “fight them there so we don’t have to fight them here†goes right out the window.
Comment by Toss these losers — August 11, 2007 @ 11:33 am
Re: “Fight them there…” You may be right, but the terrorist attacks in London and Spain haven’t stopped that mantra from the Rightwingers. I guess “fight them there” only applies to America. But the Repubs will find a way to blame the Dems…see my post at 12:02pm.
August 11th, 2007 at 12:10 pmWhat idiots, if another attacked DID occur, the only thing it would show is that the 5yrs that the USA has been at war did NOTHING to stop terrorism in the homeland.
So that’s close to $1trillion wasted an 3000+ lives gone for NOTHING.
August 11th, 2007 at 12:19 pmIf another attack happens now, I will not be ablt to keep from thinking “false flag operation.”
August 11th, 2007 at 12:29 pmNow isn’t it just a little odd that at the same Mr. Bykofsky is so vehemantly lamenting the division in our country, he makes several appearances on Right Wing media, which btw, is the root cause responsible for the division?
August 11th, 2007 at 12:58 pmCould Mr. Bykofsky be a fraud?
If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck…
710 days since we have had any major city destroyed!!! Thanks for protecting us o’ glorious President Bush!!! [sarcasm]
August 11th, 2007 at 1:06 pmBut… but… but…
I thought it was the AMERICA-HATING LEFT-WING NUTS that wished America were attacked again?
Am I wrong, or WASN’T THAT THE SUBJECT OF ANN COULTERS’ BOOK “TREASON”?
August 11th, 2007 at 1:30 pmSince the deaths of all those people was so inspiring to Bykofsky and his cheerleaders, would they be so enthusiastic for a repeat under the condition that the most cherished person in each of their lives will die in that event, and they must watch that person die. This is insane.
August 11th, 2007 at 1:33 pm“Another 3000 dead?
A few more fallen bridges ought to do the trick.
Comment by Marge N. Overa — August 11, 2007″
Yes that unfortunately is what it’s going to take to wake you dopes up!
August 11th, 2007 at 2:23 pm“Another 3000 dead?
A few more fallen bridges ought to do the trick.
Comment by Marge N. Overa — August 11, 2007″
Yes that unfortunately is what it’s going to take to wake you dopes up!
Comment by michael — August 11, 2007 @ 2:23 pm
This troll can be safely ignored.
August 11th, 2007 at 2:30 pmObviously a second attack on the heels of this nonsense will be perpetrated by neocons
Comment by ronjazz
It will be an attack against the GOP convention that will then allow the Blackwater storm troopers to cordon off the protesters even more and mass arrest them.
THe Traitorous cabal in the administration will win, because it will solidify the base under them once again, and with all of their new found powers, they will just lock up anyone who disagrees, as that will become a crime.
August 11th, 2007 at 2:31 pmOh attacking the GOP convention will also knock out the other GOP power brokers, who are just in the way of Cheney running. And viola, look how convenient a GOP attack would be.
My oh my!
“Am I wrong, or WASN’T THAT THE SUBJECT OF ANN COULTERS’ BOOK “TREASONâ€?
Comment by Mugsy — August 11, 2007″
You are exactly right! It is the left that wants our defeat!
August 11th, 2007 at 2:32 pm“Ann is such a wit!
Thanks for the link, michael!”
You’re welcome. She’s the greatest!
August 11th, 2007 at 2:33 pm“he makes several appearances on Right Wing media, which btw, is the root cause responsible for the division?
Comment by OxyCon — August 11, 2007″
They are? How?
August 11th, 2007 at 2:35 pmWow! These guys really ARE certifiably insane! To SAVE America? How totally f*cked up is THAT?
What’s scary is that this completely wacko idea is getting such wide-spread exposure in the right-wing media!
What a sick way to galzanize conservatives for the disaster that Bush has made of the “war on terror.”
August 11th, 2007 at 2:36 pm“THe Traitorous cabal in the administration will win, because it will solidify the base under them once again, and with all of their new found powers, they will just lock up anyone who disagrees, as that will become a crime.
Oh attacking the GOP convention will also knock out the other GOP power brokers, who are just in the way of Cheney running. And viola, look how convenient a GOP attack would be.
My oh my!
Comment by Bodhittsatva — August 11, 2007″
Please! Grow up?
August 11th, 2007 at 2:37 pm“for the disaster that Bush has made of the “war on terror.â€
Comment by W.Clements — August 11, 2007″
Disaster? Explain?
August 11th, 2007 at 2:38 pm“This troll can be safely ignored.
Comment by funky p — August 11, 2007″
Yes I can. Especially if you can’t answer my questions. That’s how you liberals usually play out my presence.
August 11th, 2007 at 2:40 pm“Could Mr. Bykofsky be a fraud?
Comment by OxyCon — August 11, 2007″
You tell us?
August 11th, 2007 at 2:42 pmI am more afraid of my own government than I am of the “terroristsâ€.
Comment by bilbobaggins
Bingo! So how long will it take for the REST of America to start waking up to this far greater threat? Probably not until we have a completely fascist government.
August 11th, 2007 at 2:43 pm“So how long will it take for the REST of America to start waking up to this far greater threat? Probably not until we have a completely fascist government.
Comment by W.Clements — August 11, 2007″
You liberals are a bunch of pathetic fools!
August 11th, 2007 at 2:46 pmYou trolls go ahead and talk amongst yourselves.
Ann Coulter.
August 11th, 2007 at 2:46 pmOh that’s rich.
She just oozes non-credibility.
Or something much smellier.
“She just oozes non-credibility.
Comment by funky p — August 11, 2007″
Give us an example?
August 11th, 2007 at 2:50 pm“Both of you should seek help.
Comment by THE KING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! — August 11, 2007″
I couldn’t make some of their nonsense up! It’s hilarious!
August 11th, 2007 at 2:52 pmYou liberals are a bunch of pathetic fools!
Comment by michael — August 11, 2007 @ 2:46 pm
Wow! Impressive and strongly argued ad hominem attack. Ha, ha, ha.
August 11th, 2007 at 2:54 pmWhy didn’t he just come out and admit that the Neo-Con Cabal planned and carried out the first 911? He might just as well have done so with his ridiculous article.
Does anyone really have any doubts now as to whether they had the motive, the means and the insane will to carry out the attacks of 911?
I pity the fools that still can’t see it.
August 11th, 2007 at 2:54 pmOh, I think we’ve managed to get these trolls a little worked up. Are we hitting a nerve, maybe? Can’t you control yourselves better than that? After all, in your world, it’s all about control, isn’t it?
August 11th, 2007 at 2:55 pm“I pity the fools that still can’t see it.
Comment by Smack — August 11, 2007″
Ok, I’ll bite. Explain how they did it?
August 11th, 2007 at 2:55 pmI hope the Philadelphia Daily knows they just bought themselves a lawsuit if there is another attack. Don’t think they won’t be held liable for this. FoxNews may also be named in any future suit for giving this guy a platform and co-signing his remarks. If one of the targets listed in Bykofsky’s column is attacked, the paper will be sued into bankruptcy.
August 11th, 2007 at 2:57 pmYou republicans are so smart. If there is another attack you just made it infinitely easier for the finger to be pointed right back at you. The lawsuits against this columnist will also highlight the recent spate of similar comments by other right-wingers, and it will NOT be too hard to convince a shocked public that your people either enabled or orchestrated the attack.
Folks, just pretend the trolls don’t exist. I know they’re annoying, but acknowledging their existence is giving them more validation than they ever get at home from their wives.
August 11th, 2007 at 2:57 pm“Oh, I think we’ve managed to get these trolls a little worked up.
Comment by W.Clements — August 11, 2007″
Oh I’m not worked up. I’m having fun challenging your rhetoric and watching you hide under you beds rather than respond to my questions!
August 11th, 2007 at 2:58 pmFolks, just pretend the trolls don’t exist. I know they’re annoying, but acknowledging their existence is giving them more validation than they ever get at home from their wives.
Comment by TC
LOL Great advice.
August 11th, 2007 at 2:59 pm“Folks, just pretend the trolls don’t exist.
Comment by TC — August 11, 2007″
Yes folks, if you can’t back up your rhetoric just ignore me when I challenge you.
August 11th, 2007 at 2:59 pm“The lawsuits against this columnist will also highlight the recent spate of similar comments by other right-wingers
Comment by gabriel — August 11, 2007″
For their opinions? Are you really that dumb?
August 11th, 2007 at 3:02 pmHuh?
August 11th, 2007 at 3:03 pmSomeone say something? Nah, I didn’t think so.
August 11th, 2007 at 3:03 pmOh, I think we’ve managed to get these trolls a little worked up. Are we hitting a nerve, maybe?
Comment by W.Clements — August 11, 2007 @ 2:55 pm
It’s frustrating having to be a troll. You have to cheer on the dismantling of the freedoms that made this country great. This causes a cognitive dissonance between their world view, and what they see happening to the world as a result.
August 11th, 2007 at 3:03 pmDo they honestly think things are going great?
Safely ensconced in their basement bunker, typing the great fight.
Did you see the excuse parade yesterday on that restoring the draft thread? It was hilariously reminiscent of the Blumenthal video of the College republicans. The contortions of logic for why they support the war but are themselves unable to serve. Priceless, and very telling.
The reason we will not answer the troll questions is because they are not questions that want a real answer. They are most often diversions from the topic at hand.
You should all go to Ann Coulter’s site, and post their.
I’ll bet posting of opposing ideas (opposed to Ann) are not allowed.
“he makes several appearances on Right Wing media, which btw, is the root cause responsible for the division?
Comment by OxyCon — August 11, 2007″
They are? How?
Comment by michael
=============================
Mike, do you think anyone is going to respond positively to you if you deliberately act dumb?
August 11th, 2007 at 3:04 pmI usually don’t waste my time responding to trolls, but really, are you this stupid or is it an act?
It’s a good thing this blog isn’t written on paper because you’d be wasting a ton of ink. Instead you are just wasting your own time asking the most idiotic questions.
The sad thing is, you probably get your rocks off doing it and think of yourself as some kind of genius, proud of the idiotic questions you come up with. A legend in your own mind. “I really showed them Libruls, a thing or two, didn’t I”?
Should have said post there, not their. Sorry
August 11th, 2007 at 3:05 pmOh I’m not worked up. I’m having fun challenging your rhetoric and watching you hide under you beds rather than respond to my questions!
Comment by michael
Challenging? LOL. All you seem able to do is repeatedly (ad nauseum) type “explain” over and over again.
Intellectually challenged would be more apt in your case.
August 11th, 2007 at 3:10 pm“proud of the idiotic questions you come up with.
Comment by OxyCon — August 11, 2007″
Earth to oxycon? It is you (liberals) that are making the dumb statements. I’m just challenging them. Think before you hit the enter key.
August 11th, 2007 at 3:11 pm“All you seem able to do is repeatedly (ad nauseum) type “explain†over and over again.
Comment by W.Clements — August 11, 2007″
It’s a bi*ch when someone calls you on a statement you make and you can’t answer!
August 11th, 2007 at 3:13 pm“Should have said post there, not their. Sorry
Comment by funky p — August 11, 2007″
Must be that public school education?
August 11th, 2007 at 3:14 pmIt’s frustrating having to be a troll. You have to cheer on the dismantling of the freedoms that made this country great. This causes a cognitive dissonance between their world view, and what they see happening to the world as a result.
Do they honestly think things are going great?
Comment by funky p
Well put. Lets see if we can get any of these idiots to address the loss of our freedoms under this administration?
Given their obvious desire for fascism, I think they DO think things are going great.
August 11th, 2007 at 3:16 pmIt is the media who added the word ‘need’ to the headline. The author, Bykofsky, is being used by Faux news and others like drudge (it’s probably his headline) that have amped up the rhetoric. The guy just thinks (idiotic, I know) that another big event will unite America.
August 11th, 2007 at 3:23 pmWhat I have been saying is we need leadership in our government and media that unites America. These guys do not want a united America, that’s the reason for all the divisiveness from the top on down to the trolls. They are now in the minority and desperate to hold on to power.
Unify America; Impeach the bastards and give us leadership we can trust and support. That goes for congress too.
“Lets see if we can get any of these idiots to address the loss of our freedoms under this administration?
Comment by W.Clements — August 11, 2007″
I’ll be glad to once you tell me what freedom “I” lost?
August 11th, 2007 at 3:25 pmSome people may think that in order to fight terrorism we should make a few sacrifices. Like the fourth amendment.
August 11th, 2007 at 3:29 pmThese same people will be howling when they come for their guns, like they did in La. after Katrina.
But if it’s just searching without a warrant or loss of habeas corpus or torture, that’s okay.
I am not willing to sacrifice the bill of rights for any fake war against a noun.
If they wanted to win, they would have stayed out of Iraq until al qaeda and its’ leadership was neutralized. Instead, they empowered and emboldened them.
Truth hurts.
Current reality even more so.
No wonder trolls are avoiding both.
Why the new FISA bill is even worse than you think
By: Anonymous Liberal @ 11:01 AM - PDT
As you know, just prior to adjourning for its August recess, Congress caved in to Bush administration pressure and passed the Republican version of a bill amending the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). Sixteen Democratic senators and over 40 Democratic representatives voted in favor of the bill, ensuring a comfortable margin of victory in both houses. I’m not convinced that these Democrats fully appreciate what it is they’ve done.
I say that because the full implications of these amendments are not obvious from the four corners of the bill itself and it seems to have been intentionally structured (and sold to the public) in a way that obscures its true scope.
The bill has two basic components. […]
read at: http://www.crooksandliars.com/
August 11th, 2007 at 3:30 pm.
Drudge links to provocative columns and reports from both the left and right. This doesn’t give them “credibility”.
August 11th, 2007 at 3:35 pm“I’m not convinced that these Democrats fully appreciate what it is they’ve done.
Comment by katy — August 11, 2007″
And you do?
August 11th, 2007 at 3:36 pmSome people think that by giving someone a label, especially a label they think demeans the one being labeled, like a liberal, that they have scored some kind of victory. That’s the extent of their ability to debate a point.
And they think that a system of spying on everyone by a government shrouded in secrecy is somehow designed to protect us, but have no clue how it actually strips us of rights that belong to the people and not the government. If they cannot get that, they are beyond rational thought. The constitution is about limiting what the government can do, not about limiting our freedoms.
August 11th, 2007 at 3:37 pmPerhaps they should read the bill of rights and tell us which ones we should keep, and which are okay to give away.
I would like to keep them all.
“These same people will be howling when they come for their guns
Comment by funky p — August 11, 2007″
Howl………………………………..
August 11th, 2007 at 3:38 pm“And they think that a system of spying on everyone by a government shrouded in secrecy is somehow designed to protect us
Comment by funky p — August 11, 2007″
Who’s being spied on?
August 11th, 2007 at 3:41 pmfunkyp, when are you going to make an attempt to answer any of my questions?
August 11th, 2007 at 3:42 pmHey Michael, how ’bout them Yankees?
August 11th, 2007 at 3:49 pm“Hey Michael, how ’bout them Yankees?
Comment by TC — August 11, 2007″
TC, I apologize for leaving you off my prior post.
August 11th, 2007 at 3:51 pm“I’m not convinced that these Democrats fully appreciate what it is they’ve done.
Comment by katy — August 11, 2007″
And you do?
what kind of idiot cannot properly form a simple sentence,
or question, for that matter?
and having it form a cohesive thought in context …?
oh… that kind…
August 11th, 2007 at 3:57 pmthe idiocy is just too tedious…
if that’s private school edumacation, we have a long road ahead…
…
“if that’s private school edumacation
…
Comment by katy — August 11, 2007″
I rest my case!
August 11th, 2007 at 3:58 pmDid you ever try to post something here, and it doesn’t post, but you anticipated that and copied your post, and you resubmit, and you get wordpress telling you it looks like you already submitted that comment, and you look and it isn’t there, so you re-re-submit and it tells you looks like you already said that, and you look again and it isn’t there, so you slightly modify it and re-re-resubmit it, and it doesn’t show so you re-submit and it says you already said that and you look and it is not there.
August 11th, 2007 at 4:04 pmWell that’s what is happening to my reply…apparently hits too close to the truth for the TP censors, so sorry trolls, someone else will have to explain the cganges in the FISA law which nullify the fourth amendment.
That’s the one where they can not search you or your possessions with out a warrant.
They don’t need no stinkin warrant.
You okay with that?
Testing
August 11th, 2007 at 4:08 pm“the cganges in the FISA law which nullify the fourth amendment.
Comment by funky p — August 11, 2007″
The changes in the FISA law do NOT nullify the fourth amendment! Grow up?
August 11th, 2007 at 4:08 pmheck, even nutjobs like michelle malkin find this guy’s article over the top:
http://michellemalkin.com/ 2007/ 08/ 10/ no-we-dont-need-another-911/
it’s amazing that this guy got on the news
August 11th, 2007 at 4:09 pm“heck, even nutjobs like michelle malkin find this guy’s article over the top:
Comment by Ernie — August 11, 2007″
Why is she a nutjob?
August 11th, 2007 at 4:10 pmThey are definitely censoring my post that I tried earlier. Even modifying it and adding stuff, with the essential material remaining the same. Apparently some troll actually runs this censorship right now.
Oh well, I got much better things to do.
I gave an example of a scenario in which a certain president signs a certain executive order to confiscate all bullet firing devices in contravention of amendment #2 and how would the possessors of such firing devices feel about such activity, then I stated that a similar scenario is occurring where warrants or oversight are eliminated from a comprehensive program that may in fact violate the fourth amendment and some people may have a problem with such a situation.
August 11th, 2007 at 4:15 pmPretty harmless, but I am circumlocuting the previous verbiage to hopefully bypass the non homo sapien in charge of the erase button
They won’t (censors) allow me to say it the way I want to say it and I’m tired of circumlocuting.
August 11th, 2007 at 4:27 pmThe revised law removes any and all oversight by the FISA court and relies on the judgment of Gonzales.
The writers of our Constitution insisted on a system of checks and balances, not on ‘hey, trust us’.
You probably are unable to comprehend how that violates the fourth amendment.
I stated that a similar scenario is occurring where warrants or oversight are eliminated from a comprehensive program that may in fact violate the fourth amendment
Comment by Funky p — August 11, 2007″
No, you said nullify the Fourth Amendment. Violate and nullify are two different words.
August 11th, 2007 at 4:28 pm“They won’t (censors) allow me to say it the way I want to say it and I’m tired of circumlocuting.
Comment by funky p — August 11, 2007″
Must be some vast rightwing conspiracy?
August 11th, 2007 at 4:30 pmIf I post a comment that doesn’t appear, re-submit and the wordpress says I already submitted that comment, and it still does not appear, that says they got the comment but choose not to publish it. That is censorship.
August 11th, 2007 at 4:57 pmPost your email address and I’ll send you the comment they won’t publish. It seems innocent enough to me but not to them.
righties are just manson-family-values psychos, always have been, and unless we beat them back under their rocks, THEY will destroy America for once and for all.
zealots, perverts, thieves and liars, with dangerous delusions and no conscience.
August 11th, 2007 at 5:02 pmYeah right, like anyone is going to trust one of you!!!
Comment by Protagoras — August 11, 2007 @ 5:06 pm
I have no problem posting what I tried to say. They do.
August 11th, 2007 at 5:10 pmTrust?
Like knowing someone’s email address (@yahoo or whatever) gives me some kind of power over you.
I don’t spam.
hey, I’m just like Gonzales. Honest, trustworthy, moral.
Trust me.
Faux News should be ashamed of themselves for putting someone like Bykofsky on the air. Putting him on the air is an insult to victims’ families of 9-11.
August 11th, 2007 at 5:13 pm“Putting him on the air is an insult to victims’ families of 9-11.
Comment by Probus — August 11, 2007″
It is? How?
August 11th, 2007 at 5:18 pmDon’t take the bait.
August 11th, 2007 at 5:19 pm“Don’t take the bait.
Comment by funky p — August 11, 2007″
Don’t take the bait? It was a pretty simple question. Are you saying probus is as full of hot air as you are?
August 11th, 2007 at 5:37 pmPNAC said the US should take control of the Middle East because their oil is so vital to us, but that it would take a new Pearl Harbor before the people would go along.
There was no terrorism