For now I’m going to continue to practice at the rifle range and stock up on ammunition, food and water filters. If ya’ll succeed at starting a civil war I’ll be ready to defend my family and property from all of the crazies. If on the other hand you’d prefer a revolution that takes our country back from the corporations and gives it to the citizens, count me in.

Zooey,
I can’t quite make up my mind whether or not you’re being too harsh on weasels. The rest I can unequivocally agree with. But I hear that the WH will still try to claim “executive privilege” for private citizen Turdblossom.

This is Rove’s legacy.

Hey, LAGFN/liberalsdestroyedamerica/IHeartAlito/Ihateliberals/
neoconsfartterrorists, etc. ,
If you never referred to 93 AGs in any of your posts, what did you mean by
“BJ Clinton himself fired 90-something AGs in his 2nd term” (Comment by Libsaregoodfornothing — August 13, 2007 @ 4:06 pm)?
The number “90-something” applies to US Attorneys, because if, as you have written, that each state has its own AG, then there should be only 50 of such people. Or are you telling us that 43 new states have suddenly been added to the Union? BTW, Clinton did not fire any state Attorney Generals but 92 of the 93 US Attorneys at the beginning of his first–not his second–term.
No matter how you try to spin what you said (like a typical neoCON conman), you can’t erase your first post at 4:06 pm, August 13. Maybe instead of thinking up yet another new moniker, you ought to devote a little more time to thinking about the contents of your posts and checking the facts. But, of course, facts don’t mean much to a neoCON KoolAid addict, do they?

Oh dear, you are being a silly boy again. The United States has an Attorney General (only one). The states each have a US Attorney. Now is that clear enough for you to understand.

I think that maybe you didn’t get enough sleep last night little man. You aren’t making a lot of sense here.

Of course there is no proof you silly person. How can there be any proof when Bush refuses to turn over documents and says that no one can talk to the investigating committee because of Executive Privilege.

And, it was just a really big coincidence that all of the US Attorneys (Not AG’s) who were fired were either investigating Republicans or refused to become involved in “voter fraud” cases where there was no proof.

You are a silly, silly person. But, you are entirely welcome to live in your dream world if it makes you feel better.

Comment by Libsaregoodfornothing — August 13, 2007 @ 4:36 pm”

Oh….. Yeah…..

One more thing to SHOW YOUR IGNORANCE!!!!!

The ONLY AG that Bush has ANY control over is the US AG!!!!!

So obviously, when I stated ONLY ONE AG that is what I meant…..

But of course to an IGNORAMOUS like you, who is uneducated, you think Bush has control over ALL AG’s even the State AG’s…..

Keep posting….. PLEASE, as you just show how ignorant you are and just what the Republican base really represents…. I-D-I-O-T-S

HEY DICKWAD!!!!

YOU are the FIRST one to bring up the AG’s when YOU meant the US Attorney’s……

Now go stick your head back up Bush’s ass…. he needs to know if those polups came back….

Oh…. And in the order it was discussed…..

1) “BJ Clinton himself fired 90-something AGs in his 2nd term, showing how legal that was. Conyers just insists on publicly shaming Rove; that’s why he wants a full hearing in front of the cameras.

Comment by Libsaregoodfornothing — August 13, 2007 @ 4:06 pm”

2) “It is best when a new president dismisses ALL ATTORNEYS at the beginning of the new term in office. The problem with Bush and Rove – numbnuts – is that Bush SELECTIVELY FIRED only the atorneys who were not digging up BS charges of voter fraud in PARTICULARLY VUNERABLE DISTRICTS.

Comment by Tom — August 13, 2007 @ 4:22 pm”

3) “Tom,
You have no proof that Bush “selectively fired” only AGs who weren’t digging up “BS” charger of voter fraud in “vulnerable” districts. You just regurgitated talking points from what your brainwashers (Air America, Lib media) tell you. The REAL TRUTH is that Bush justly and legally fired some AGs for NOT going after Dem lawmakers more aggressively despite overwhelming evidence of wrongdoing on their part. Those AGs were obviously inept, so they had to be fired.

Comment by Libsaregoodfornothing — August 13, 2007 @ 4:30 pm”

4) “You’re a dummy because you claim there’s only one AG. But, if you knew about civic structure, you’d know that every state has its own AG. That’s what we were talking about.

Comment by Libsaregoodfornothing — August 13, 2007 @ 4:36 pm”

No it was not!!!!! The CONTEXT was about the US Attorney’s but YOU kept refering to them as AG’s…..

It is just so easy showing the world how stupid you really are….

Please make it harder for me…….

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Comment by Libsaregoodfornothing — August 13, 2007 @ 5:11 pm”

And if what you meant to begin with was AG’s, the you are a bigger DOLT than first thought…..

No you don’t…. You KEEP REFERENCING AG’s…… Which is why Tom and I keep calling you on it….

Poor little fool……