Comments on: Official army sites riskier to security than milbogs. http://thinkprogress.org/2007/08/17/official-army-sites-riskier-to-security-than-milbogs/ Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:26:35 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Sgt Jon http://thinkprogress.org/2007/08/17/official-army-sites-riskier-to-security-than-milbogs/comment-page-1/#comment-4037935 Sgt Jon Sun, 26 Aug 2007 20:00:26 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/08/17/official-army-sites-riskier-to-security-than-milbogs/#comment-4037935 and now for something slightly different. Army Wrong counters the "Army Strong" message that the Pentagon is spending $1.2 billion on. <strong>www.armywrong.net</strong> and now for something slightly different.

Army Wrong counters the “Army Strong” message that the Pentagon is spending $1.2 billion on.

http://www.armywrong.net

]]> By: Boobofeller http://thinkprogress.org/2007/08/17/official-army-sites-riskier-to-security-than-milbogs/comment-page-1/#comment-4022484 Boobofeller Sun, 19 Aug 2007 15:19:27 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/08/17/official-army-sites-riskier-to-security-than-milbogs/#comment-4022484 Hmmm... this one has actual portions of the film, as opposed to the lecture I sent before. Easier to take in. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4924210127668646066&q=war+made+easy&total=723&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=1 Hmmm… this one has actual portions of the film, as opposed to the lecture I sent before. Easier to take in.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4924210127668646066&q=war+made+easy&total=723&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=1

]]> By: Boobofeller http://thinkprogress.org/2007/08/17/official-army-sites-riskier-to-security-than-milbogs/comment-page-1/#comment-4022482 Boobofeller Sun, 19 Aug 2007 15:12:23 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/08/17/official-army-sites-riskier-to-security-than-milbogs/#comment-4022482 A good video to see about the military trying to control the message is in Norman Solomon's "War made easy" http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1095962518364875441&q=war+made+easy&total=723&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0 Check it out in Google Videos. A good video to see about the military trying to control the message is in Norman Solomon’s “War made easy”
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1095962518364875441&q=war+made+easy&total=723&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0
Check it out in Google Videos.

]]> By: Mugsy http://thinkprogress.org/2007/08/17/official-army-sites-riskier-to-security-than-milbogs/comment-page-1/#comment-4020958 Mugsy Sat, 18 Aug 2007 17:29:39 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/08/17/official-army-sites-riskier-to-security-than-milbogs/#comment-4020958 "1,813" vs. "28". Gee, if reports like this start popping up, I might start to think that the Bush Administration is simply seeking to quash public military dissent. <strong>Nah! Not <em>THIS</em> President!</strong> “1,813″ vs. “28″.

Gee, if reports like this start popping up, I might start to think that the Bush Administration is simply seeking to quash public military dissent.

Nah! Not THIS President!

]]> By: Doc Rock http://thinkprogress.org/2007/08/17/official-army-sites-riskier-to-security-than-milbogs/comment-page-1/#comment-4019635 Doc Rock Sat, 18 Aug 2007 00:06:02 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/08/17/official-army-sites-riskier-to-security-than-milbogs/#comment-4019635 How ironic is it that those who risk their lives daily should be denied the basic right of freedom of speech while some desk jockey in DC piles up the violations? The Army is in such complete cover up mode that the leadership reeks of mendacity. It just doesn't seem like the Army I was in 40 years ago. How ironic is it that those who risk their lives daily should be denied the basic right of freedom of speech while some desk jockey in DC piles up the violations? The Army is in such complete cover up mode that the leadership reeks of mendacity. It just doesn’t seem like the Army I was in 40 years ago.

]]> By: Parrotlover77 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/08/17/official-army-sites-riskier-to-security-than-milbogs/comment-page-1/#comment-4019339 Parrotlover77 Fri, 17 Aug 2007 21:19:31 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/08/17/official-army-sites-riskier-to-security-than-milbogs/#comment-4019339 Can't let the soldiers speak out -- even when they are clearly not saying anything inappropriate. Why that'd let the terrorists win! But right-wing douche-bag reporters and official government personnel show mission routes on live TV, out CIA agents, talk about classified information to whomever they want (at any security clearance), and publish any information they want on any website, without a hint of oversight! Supportin' tha troops! Can’t let the soldiers speak out — even when they are clearly not saying anything inappropriate. Why that’d let the terrorists win! But right-wing douche-bag reporters and official government personnel show mission routes on live TV, out CIA agents, talk about classified information to whomever they want (at any security clearance), and publish any information they want on any website, without a hint of oversight!

Supportin’ tha troops!

]]> By: cheney_usa http://thinkprogress.org/2007/08/17/official-army-sites-riskier-to-security-than-milbogs/comment-page-1/#comment-4019281 cheney_usa Fri, 17 Aug 2007 20:52:51 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/08/17/official-army-sites-riskier-to-security-than-milbogs/#comment-4019281 Sorry for the double post. The blog violations were for stuff like showing an all blowed up humvee. Sorry for the double post.

The blog violations were for stuff like showing an all blowed up humvee.

]]> By: bilbobaggins http://thinkprogress.org/2007/08/17/official-army-sites-riskier-to-security-than-milbogs/comment-page-1/#comment-4019277 bilbobaggins Fri, 17 Aug 2007 20:51:15 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/08/17/official-army-sites-riskier-to-security-than-milbogs/#comment-4019277 How embarrassing. But, they won't believe the findings. They want to control the message and they won't be able to do that unless they can "prove" that the military blogs are a threat to our national security. How embarrassing. But, they won’t believe the findings. They want to control the message and they won’t be able to do that unless they can “prove” that the military blogs are a threat to our national security.

]]> By: gfw http://thinkprogress.org/2007/08/17/official-army-sites-riskier-to-security-than-milbogs/comment-page-1/#comment-4019239 gfw Fri, 17 Aug 2007 20:37:37 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/08/17/official-army-sites-riskier-to-security-than-milbogs/#comment-4019239 wouldn't it be milbLogs? With an "L" wouldn’t it be milbLogs? With an “L”

]]> By: had enough http://thinkprogress.org/2007/08/17/official-army-sites-riskier-to-security-than-milbogs/comment-page-1/#comment-4019237 had enough Fri, 17 Aug 2007 20:37:33 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/08/17/official-army-sites-riskier-to-security-than-milbogs/#comment-4019237 But won't the milbogs expose the fabrications the fascist R media machine is trying to sell to the masses? Can't have that. But won’t the milbogs expose the fabrications the fascist R media machine is trying to sell to the masses? Can’t have that.

]]> By: cheney_usa http://thinkprogress.org/2007/08/17/official-army-sites-riskier-to-security-than-milbogs/comment-page-1/#comment-4019217 cheney_usa Fri, 17 Aug 2007 20:31:17 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/08/17/official-army-sites-riskier-to-security-than-milbogs/#comment-4019217 My favorite violation: "In one incidence, we found a military web site that contained a document listing addresses, room numbers and points of contact of safes that contained classified information." My favorite violation:

“In one incidence, we found a military web site that contained a document listing addresses, room numbers and points of contact of safes that contained classified information.”

]]> By: cheney_usa http://thinkprogress.org/2007/08/17/official-army-sites-riskier-to-security-than-milbogs/comment-page-1/#comment-4019214 cheney_usa Fri, 17 Aug 2007 20:30:37 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/08/17/official-army-sites-riskier-to-security-than-milbogs/#comment-4019214 My favorite violation (typos in orig): <i>"In one incidence, we found a military web site that contained a document listing addresses, room numbers and points of contact of safes that contained classified information." </i> My favorite violation (typos in orig):

“In one incidence, we found a military web site that contained a document listing
addresses, room numbers and points of contact of safes that contained classified
information.”

]]> By: Capt Morgan http://thinkprogress.org/2007/08/17/official-army-sites-riskier-to-security-than-milbogs/comment-page-1/#comment-4019206 Capt Morgan Fri, 17 Aug 2007 20:28:19 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/08/17/official-army-sites-riskier-to-security-than-milbogs/#comment-4019206 Nothing to see here, move on.. Go shopping and be vigilant for others not of the same color. Nothing to see here, move on.. Go shopping and be vigilant for others not of the same color.

]]>