Rove: My ‘Worst’ Mistake Was ‘Saying Something Unkind’ To A Colleague
Rove: My ‘Worst’ Mistake Was ‘Saying Something Unkind’ To A Colleague
Today, Karl Rove gave a media interview at an IHOP in Waco, Texas. During that interview, he says that now is not the “time for regrets.” The one instance he concedes was a mistake was when he said “something unkind” to a co-worker:
He was alternately emotional and nostalgic, clinical and unbowed, but rarely introspective, saying, “There will be time for regrets; there will be things that I didn’t do as well as I should have, there will be things that I’ve left undone.”
He only described one regret in particular: “I remember having a conversation with a colleague — I want to say not only a colleague, but a very close friend — and responding out of frustration at the end of a seemingly long, continuing dialogue that turned into an argument, and saying something unkind, and it was the worst I ever felt at the White House. I later apologized to him for it.”
Rove expressed a similar lack of introspection in a recent Wall Street Journal interview. When asked about his mistakes, he said, “I’ll put my feet up in September and think about that.”
According to the New York Times write-up of the interview, Rove never once mentions the Iraq war, which he promoted as a member of the White House Iraq Group. Nor does he address his role in leaking the identity of covert CIA operative Valerie Plame. Regarding the U.S. attorney scandal — in which he helped draw up the list of fired prosecutors — he simply states, “Everything was handled appropriately.”
Disappointingly, the closest he comes to actually revealing any differences with President Bush is admitting that he thinks that Barney, the President’s Scottish terrier, “is a lump.”
Sort Comments By: Top Rated | Date
“…admitting that he thinks that Barney, the President’s Scottish terrier, “is a lump.â€
Coming from a turd, perhaps he’s expressing his feelings of kinship…..
August 18th, 2007 at 3:57 pmi keep hoping satan will call in the marker on rove’s soul early… is that too much to hope for…?
And, yes, I DO take it personally
August 18th, 2007 at 3:57 pmMore disappointment for the moonbats, how sad.
August 18th, 2007 at 3:58 pmHe called me a child molesting homosexual.
Just for the record.
August 18th, 2007 at 4:01 pmRove is a “lump”.
August 18th, 2007 at 4:06 pmYou did a great job, Karl!
Yo will be missed.
August 18th, 2007 at 4:06 pmRove is a waste of skin.
August 18th, 2007 at 4:07 pmPsychopaths don’t engage in introspection.
August 18th, 2007 at 4:10 pmMore disappointment for the moonbats, how sad.
Comment by Frank J — August 18, 2007 @ 3:58 pm
Huh?
August 18th, 2007 at 4:11 pmNo, your worst mistake was having your boyfriend, Gannon, for overnight stays at the White House. It’ll come out soon enough, doughboy.
August 18th, 2007 at 4:12 pmScrew you Karl.
Why haven’t you paid your taxes for the company you operate in Texas? Huh? Huh?
August 18th, 2007 at 4:13 pmLike his boss, Rove simply refuses to acknowledge error. “Mistakes? What?”
August 18th, 2007 at 4:16 pmBarney may be a lump, Karl, but he’s my lump. The one I like to milk every morning when I’m away from the ranch and my favorite milk horse.
August 18th, 2007 at 4:17 pmhe looks like a pig.
August 18th, 2007 at 4:19 pmKarl
Did you read the story about Mr. Candy Ass getting his panties in a wad because an Austin newspaper thinks he’s dressing like “Walker, Texas Ranger?”
Too bad you won’t be around to tamp those stories down anymore. Maybe we’ll also find out how long he’s been wearing a wire to deliver his speeches!
August 18th, 2007 at 4:20 pmGood for Karl “The Architect” Rove for admitting nothing to libtards and progressive varmint that they can use to taint him with further. Since “mistakes” are a subjective matter, it’s great that Rove will further frustrate libtards with his refusal to admit “wrongdoing.” This will drive already unstable libtards and progressive schizoids into further apoplectic states, as the best way to peeve a libtard is to deny that Rove or Bush ever did anything wrong! I will now list what Rove has done right, and from this list, it’s easy to see why Rove had such a hard time admitting to anything wrong. Thanks in part to Rove the US has: been spared more terror attacks domestically, recovered from the Clinton-Gore recession, moved the Supreme Court center-right, brought down the deficit, and cut Al-Qaeda leadership by 70 or more percent. This list of feats is only a small part of what he achieved. If anything, libtards should apologize to Rove for character assassinating him fanatically.
August 18th, 2007 at 4:25 pmRove’s worst horrific mistake is participating in genocide for OIL. Fabricating LIES to the American people so they would go along with it - send their children to fight.
August 18th, 2007 at 4:26 pmAn IHOP in Waco?
The guys got class allright.
August 18th, 2007 at 4:26 pmCan I post yet TP?
August 18th, 2007 at 4:27 pmI just want to kiss Honorable Karls turdblossom!
Karl shoud get the medal of Frydumb!
August 18th, 2007 at 4:28 pmThe hallmark of a TRUE PSYCHOPATH the inability to have a conscience about the pain and suffering he has caused others. His ersatz remorse at saying an “unkind” word to a colleague is for his own ego more than the pain he caused the colleague. We have a man here whose carreer has been built upon fraud of the highest and most felonious order.
August 18th, 2007 at 4:28 pmBTW: Has anybody heard there is a RUN ON COUNTRYWIDE BANK? We haven’t seen runs on banks since the Great Depression.
And the worst thing that Mr. Lumpy said? “I’ll be taking charge from now on”.
August 18th, 2007 at 4:29 pmAnyone else notice how the conservative water carriers just love to use the term “lib-tard”?
Isn’t it ironic that if one were to use the same sentiment for Re-publicans, you’d end up with “re-tard.” Retard… Sounds shoe sure fits.
August 18th, 2007 at 4:30 pmHallucination on display in #16
August 18th, 2007 at 4:32 pmWhat’s to be upset about? They are all beginning to drift into oblivion. With each passing day this unpleasantness comes closer to an end. Forget them as history will.
August 18th, 2007 at 4:33 pmKarl shoud get the medal of Frydumb!
Comment by Lie Berator — August 18, 2007 @ 4:28 pm
And the Croix de Poulet-Faucon, too!!!
Let the Freedom Fries flow! Chow down while they’re pipin’ hot, wingers!
August 18th, 2007 at 4:34 pmMAKE WAY FOR THE BUSH-ROVE-WOLFOWITZ-GREENSPAN GREAT DEPRESSION. No wonder Tony Snow-Job is bailing out.
August 18th, 2007 at 4:36 pmThere is at this moment a run on CountryWide Bank. Monday will tell whether or not CountryWide will survive or declare bankruptcy.
http://www.americablog.com/ 2007/ 08/ run-on-banks-in-la-as-its-time-to-pay.html
If anything, libtards should apologize to Rove for character assassinating him fanatically.
Comment by Pelosigetsnosexevenfromhusband — August 18, 2007 @ 4:25 pm
Competition for stupidest troll is also heavy around here, but my vote goes to this idiot, who also thinks that mine safety should be left in the hands of mine owners.
As Richard Reeves notes in this column, Rove really accomplished nothing beyond helping Bush get elected, regardless of what the troll seems to think actually happened in DC.
Pretentious Mr Rove
It’s true that the Left has demonized Rove but we’ve given him far too much credit for machinations behind GWB. He’s never been anything but a hack political consultant.
August 18th, 2007 at 4:37 pmThe career of Karl Rove (so far) has taught us two things:
–Republicans cannot win without injecting massive amounts of DECEPTION into the political equation. If they lie and scare people enough, Republicans can bugger their way into power for brief periods.
–Republican political techniques have only short-term efficacy. The very deceptions and tricks they use to get into power eventually cause revulsion in normal people.
August 18th, 2007 at 4:38 pmRove looks like a fatted tick and all but the most drooling mentally retarded conservative psychopath knows he’s been a parasite on America. Maybe Bush got his Lyme Disease from Herr Roverer?
August 18th, 2007 at 4:38 pmEh, should be “always heavy”.
August 18th, 2007 at 4:38 pmIf anything, libtards should apologize to Rove for character assassinating him fanatically.
Comment by Pelosigetsnosexevenfromhusband
Nice name by the way….would you like to start the apologizing?
August 18th, 2007 at 4:39 pmRove is a criminal, so he has no remorse about anything.
August 18th, 2007 at 4:41 pmIHOP in Waco! Now we know how he keeps that pale, porcine, puke puss of his in “shape.”
August 18th, 2007 at 4:43 pmLet the Freedom Fries flow! Chow down while they’re pipin’ hot, wingers!
Heh. Bad news IHOP is fresh outta food from filling Karls slop bucket.
Good News Waco citizens lose weight!
Good News IHOP stocks rise after huge influx of cash from Waco!
Bad News Karls transportation had four blow-outs due to excessive loading at IHOP!
August 18th, 2007 at 4:43 pmGood for Karl “The Architect†Rove for admitting nothing to libtards and progressive varmint that they can use to taint him with further -PGNSEFH
Are you kidding? IHOP + Rove?
This is SatNiteLive material!
August 18th, 2007 at 4:46 pmSo Rover eats slope at IHOPs > no wonder he has fat pudgy cheeks > lol.
August 18th, 2007 at 4:47 pmCouldn’t wait on this one. I’m sure TP interns are hard at work getting ready to post this but until then. How is this for news?
Congressman Baird sees need for longer U.S. role in Iraq
http://www.theolympian.com/news/story/192500.html
U.S. Rep. Brian Baird said Thursday that his recent trip to Iraq convinced him the military needs more time in the region, and that a hasty pullout would cause chaos that helps Iran and harms U.S. security. “I believe that the decision to invade Iraq and the post-invasion management of that country were among the largest foreign-policy mistakes in the history of our nation. I voted against them, and I still think they were the right votes,” Baird said in a telephone interview from Washington, D.C. “But we’re on the ground now. We have a responsibility to the Iraqi people and a strategic interest in making this work.” Baird, a five-term Democrat, voted against President Bush ordering the Iraq invasion — at a time when he was in a minority in Congress and at risk of alienating voters. He returned late Tuesday from a trip that included stops in Israel, Jordan and Iraq, where he met troops, U.S. advisers and Iraqis, whose stories have convinced him that U.S. troops must stay longer.
August 18th, 2007 at 4:50 pmMeanwhile, back in the civilized world, real Presidential strategerizer and image man, Michael Deaver, is dead.
Deaver was Reagan’s image guy.
August 18th, 2007 at 4:50 pmKarl doesn’t like Barney because he’s the only thing in America he doesn’t have a shot at controlling. He can send him off to die for oil in Iraq. He can’t wire tap him. He’s not a little boy so he can’t molest him. He may have a good chance at getting him elected POTUS though. If he could get a chimp elected then why not a dog?
August 18th, 2007 at 4:52 pm“I believe that the decision to invade Iraq and the post-invasion management of that country were among the largest foreign-policy mistakes in the history of our nation. I voted against them, and I still think they were the right votes,†Baird said in a telephone interview from Washington, D.C.
What he really said was adults will have to take over the mess the Boy Emperor created and clean it up for him.
One could always ask the question, “If things are going so well, why are hard-core Bushinistas bailing from SUNKEN ship like crazy?
Glub… glub… glub…
August 18th, 2007 at 4:55 pmMike Deaver a great American! God’s speed to him and prayers for his family.
August 18th, 2007 at 4:55 pmActually Frank J, that is what Powell called the pottery barn rule. You break it you buy it. We are now the proud owners of a country of 25 million muslims with a jobless rate of 50-70%
Doesn’t the thought of that welfare state just warm your soul?
August 18th, 2007 at 4:57 pmBut he didn’t say that did he? The Reid, Pelosi, Murtha surrender plan he has rejected and since no Democrat has offered an alternative other than quitting, he must be waiting for Fred Thompson to come in January 09 and kick Islamo ass.
August 18th, 2007 at 4:57 pmComment by Frank J — August 18, 2007 @ 4:50 pm
Like I have been saying for months, no one (Democrat or Republican) is serious about troop withdrawal. America has to stabilize Iraq in order to prevent an all out, full-blown, pan-Muslim, genocide (the likes of which no one has ever seen). All of this is because of the savagery and barbarism that Islam has propagated in Middle Eastern people.
August 18th, 2007 at 4:57 pmKarl Rove is his own mistake.
August 18th, 2007 at 4:59 pmhe must be waiting for Fred Thompson to come in January 09 and kick Islamo ass.
Comment by Frank J — August 18, 2007 @ 4:57 pm
—
Aren’t all Americans?!
August 18th, 2007 at 4:59 pmMy ‘Worst’ Mistake Was being an architect of a disastrous war which killed 1 million Iraqis
August 18th, 2007 at 4:59 pm.
August 18th, 2007 at 4:59 pmAmerica has to stabilize Iraq in order to prevent an all out, full-blown, pan-Muslim, genocide (the likes of which no one has ever seen). All of this is because of the savagery and barbarism that Islam has propagated in Middle Eastern people.
Comment by Liberator — August 18, 2007 @ 4:57 pm
Indeed, worse than Nazi Germany… okay, scratch that. Worse than Cambodia… okay, scratch that. Worse than Stalinist Russia… okay, scratch that. Worse than… worse than… hmmm…
August 18th, 2007 at 5:00 pmhe must be waiting for Fred Thompson to come in January 09 and kick Islamo ass.
Comment by Frank J — August 18, 2007 @ 4:57 pm
—
Aren’t all Americans?!
Comment by Liberator — August 18, 2007 @ 4:59 pm
Has anyone here ever demanded the trolls take drug tests? Jes’ askin’…
They appear to be hallucinating.
August 18th, 2007 at 5:01 pmKR: I’ll have the rooty tooty fresh and fruity.
Waitress: Your expecting Mr Gannon to join you?
KR: Yes, and could you bring me a few cups of lard from your kitchen, I m quite sure Jeffy will need lubing.
August 18th, 2007 at 5:03 pmLike I have been saying for months, no one (Democrat or Republican) is serious about troop withdrawal. America has to stabilize Iraq in order to prevent an all out, full-blown, pan-Muslim, genocide (the likes of which no one has ever seen). All of this is because of the savagery and barbarism that Islam has propagated in Middle Eastern people.
Comment by Liberator — August 18, 2007 @ 4:57 pm
Repeating the same batsh!t ignorant opinion for months doesn’t make it any less batsh!t ignorant.
There are so many stupid ideas packed into that paragraph that it’s almost a work of art.
August 18th, 2007 at 5:05 pm#44: The Reid, Pelosi, Murtha surrender plan he has rejected and since no Democrat has offered an alternative other than quitting, he must be waiting for Fred Thompson to come in January 09 and kick Islamo ass.
I see. So, in our view, any plan that does not involve more senseless killing, more billions of wasted dollars, more recruitment opportunities for Islamic terrorists, and worsened worldwide opinion of the United States is tantamount to “surrender” and “quitting.” Sorry if I’m not buying that truckload of manure.
What, in particular, do you think Fred Thompson will do that will be so fantastic? Invade Iran? Invade Syria? Institute the draft? Drop some nuclear bombs on Mecca? Double the size of Gitmo? How, exactly, do you think this will be effective against terrorism?
August 18th, 2007 at 5:05 pmhe must be waiting for Fred Thompson to come in January 09 and kick Islamo ass. Comment by Frank J
Bwhahaha. Whats he gonna do pose in front of a camera and read a hollywood script?
August 18th, 2007 at 5:05 pmHas anyone here ever demanded the trolls take drug tests? Jes’ askin’…
They appear to be hallucinating.
Comment by The Republic of Stupidity — August 18, 2007 @ 5:01 pm
It’s not a good kind of hallucination, either. Probably some particularly loathesome mushroom.
August 18th, 2007 at 5:06 pmm quite sure Jeffy will need lubing.
Comment by Lie Berator — August 18, 2007 @ 5:03 pm
Jeffy Lube??? Not… gonna… sleep… well tonight, or keep dinner down for that matter.
August 18th, 2007 at 5:07 pmMission Nearly Accomplished
“It’s best that you be leavin’, Karl,”
Said Richard with his custom snarl.
“I’m on my way. Don’t worry, Dick.
Election’s coming. Must be quick.
I’ll find another way to screw ‘em.
They won’t know what happened to ‘em.”
“You know your orders? Got the plan?”
said Dick as he gave Karl his hand.
“Yes, Sir, I’ve got the plan right here.
My mission, Sir, is very clear:
To rove this land from sea to sea,
And finish off democracy.”
*******
Also, my Jon Stewart defense spoof:
http://www.massachusettsobserver.com/spoof.htm
August 18th, 2007 at 5:07 pmLike I have been saying for months, no one (Democrat or Republican) is serious about troop withdrawal. America has to stabilize Iraq in order to prevent an all out, full-blown, pan-Muslim, genocide (the likes of which no one has ever seen). All of this is because of the savagery and barbarism that Islam has propagated in Middle Eastern people.
Comment by Liberator — August 18, 2007 @ 4:57 pm
You rented 300 didn’t you?
August 18th, 2007 at 5:07 pmFred Thompson can distract the press by having his wife expose her boobs. That is about the only thing the guy can offer > lol.
August 18th, 2007 at 5:07 pmhe must be waiting for Fred Thompson to come in January 09 and kick Islamo ass. Comment by Frank J
Will Mrs Thompson do a special “patriotic” pole dance at the inaugeral?
August 18th, 2007 at 5:08 pmBwhahaha. Whats he gonna do pose in front of a camera and read a hollywood script?
Comment by Lie Berator — August 18, 2007 @ 5:05 pm
Is he the one that smells manly? He’s tall, I know that. There’s nothing that gets a conservative’s knickers damp like a tall southerner. “Ooooh, he’s so manly! He should be our Leader.”
August 18th, 2007 at 5:08 pmIt’s not a good kind of hallucination, either. Probably some particularly loathesome mushroom.
But magic mushrooms are the best ….lovely
August 18th, 2007 at 5:11 pmFred Thompson can distract the press by having his wife expose her boobs. That is about the only thing the guy can offer > lol.
Comment by Jay Randal — August 18, 2007 @ 5:07 pm
Here’s an interesting question for ya… who’s got the bigger pair of boobs working for ‘em?
Mrs. Thompson or Bush???
Answer below….
Bush - Cheney and Gonzalez…
August 18th, 2007 at 5:11 pmIs he the one that smells manly? He’s tall, I know that. There’s nothing that gets a conservative’s knickers damp like a tall southerner. “Ooooh, he’s so manly! He should be our Leader.â€
Comment by gummitch — August 18, 2007 @ 5:08 pm
Isn’t Carrot Top from the south? And is he tall?
Really, could we do any worse with Carrot Top?
August 18th, 2007 at 5:11 pmWhat, in particular, do you think Fred Thompson will do that will be so fantastic?
Fred will secure the borders, kill the terrorists and punch the hippies.
He will not fight a PC war against Islamo Fascism as Bush has done. And he certainly won’t run away to Okinawa as the Democrats want to do.
He will fight as Reagan did against the Soviets a borderless war. No sanctuary for the Islamists, including Pelosi’s friends in Iran and Syria.
August 18th, 2007 at 5:11 pmgummitch > the one they think smells nice is Mitt Romney. They also think he has a wide back they want to lay on > lol.
August 18th, 2007 at 5:12 pmFred will secure the borders, kill the terrorists and punch the hippies.
He will not fight a PC war against Islamo Fascism as Bush has done. And he certainly won’t run away to Okinawa as the Democrats want to do.
He will fight as Reagan did against the Soviets a borderless war. No sanctuary for the Islamists, including Pelosi’s friends in Iran and Syria.
Comment by Frank J — August 18, 2007 @ 5:11 pm
Okay… this troll needs to be tested for sustance abuse now.
August 18th, 2007 at 5:13 pmFrank > Thompson is married, so he will NOT date you.
August 18th, 2007 at 5:14 pm#45: Like I have been saying for months, no one (Democrat or Republican) is serious about troop withdrawal.
This is simply false. A number of Democrats are serious about troop withdrawal. No one thinks this can be done overnight; but that’s hardly the sane as not being serious about troop withdrawal. A favorite Republican straw man is to say that anyone who doesn’t want to pull ALL our troops out RIGHT NOW is somehow not serious about withdrawal.
America has to stabilize Iraq in order to prevent an all out, full-blown, pan-Muslim, genocide (the likes of which no one has ever seen).
This is idiotic on several levels. It shows a profound ignorance of history (read up on genocides in Nazi Germany, Cambodia, Sudan, and Rwanda before you make a moronic statement like yours), and it implies that the U.S.’s current strategy is in the process of “stabilizing” Iraq, which it most assuredly is not. The U.S. is a destabilizing force in Iraq, and will continue to be as long as we are there.
All of this is because of the savagery and barbarism that Islam has propagated in Middle Eastern people.
So, Islam itself is “savage” and “barbaric”? Tell me, sir, how is it that you, who advocate war and all the destruction and savagery and barbarism and brutality associated with it, are NOT savage and barbaric?
August 18th, 2007 at 5:14 pmHe will fight as Reagan did against the Soviets a borderless war. No sanctuary for the Islamists, including Pelosi’s friends in Iran and Syria.
Comment by Frank J — August 18, 2007 @ 5:11 pm
You are so f*cking stupid.
August 18th, 2007 at 5:17 pmNow there’s two reasons not to ever visit Waco.
August 18th, 2007 at 5:17 pmPunch the hippies? Is this like whack a troll? What are his plans for the yippies, yuppies, Xers, beatniks, Bohemians, straight edgers, feminists, and all other the others Frank doesn’t like?
August 18th, 2007 at 5:19 pm#66: Fred will secure the borders, kill the terrorists and punch the hippies.
Whatever. You’ve clearly been watching too many John Wayne movies.
He will not fight a PC war against Islamo Fascism as Bush has done.
Right. So Thompson will really take the ‘ol gloves off, huh? So what does that entail, Mr. Macho Man? War in Iran? War in Syria? War in Pakistan? Nukes on the holy sites in Mecca? Come on, brother, tell us all your fantasies. You know you want to.
And he certainly won’t run away to Okinawa as the Democrats want to do.
Okinawa?
He will fight as Reagan did against the Soviets a borderless war.
Oooooooooh. Will Thompson wear a cowboy hat, too? How about a coonskin cap?
No sanctuary for the Islamists, including Pelosi’s friends in Iran and Syria.
Right, because inherently, if you TALK to someone, you approve of everything they do.
August 18th, 2007 at 5:21 pmWhen you visit a dictator and don’t ask him why he assassinated the the former President of Lebanon you must appove of everything he does.
The concern about Thompson for the looney left is that he like Bush actually believes the United States is worth defending.
August 18th, 2007 at 5:23 pmFrank:
August 18th, 2007 at 5:23 pmA guy named Fred has as much chance of becoming president of the US as a black man or a woman does. Wait a minute no he doesn’t, they do
The left’s plan to fight Islamo Fascism?
August 18th, 2007 at 5:25 pmThe left’s plan to fight Islamo Fascism?
Comment by Frank J — August 18, 2007 @ 5:25 pm
Let’s start with a rock solid definition of “Islamo Fascism,” shall we?
August 18th, 2007 at 5:27 pmFred might blow up Iran’s one and only gasoline refinery. And if he did how would the moonbats react?
August 18th, 2007 at 5:27 pmFred might blow up Iran’s one and only gasoline refinery. And if he did how would the moonbats react?
Comment by Frank J — August 18, 2007 @ 5:27 pm
More importantly, how would the Iranians react?
August 18th, 2007 at 5:29 pm#75: When you visit a dictator and don’t ask him why he assassinated the the former President of Lebanon you must appove of everything he does.
The logical fallacy in this statement is self-evident. Maybe not to you, Frank, but to anybody who’s ever taken ninth-grade English.
The concern about Thompson for the looney left is that he like Bush actually believes the United States is worth defending.
I don’t doubt that you actually believe this load of horse crap, Frank. So, how should left-wingers be dealt with, Frank? Rounded up and put in concentration camps? After all, they’re all guilty of treason, right? They’re disloyal to the United States, right? Punishable by death, wouldn’t you think?
August 18th, 2007 at 5:29 pmComment by Liberator — August 18, 2007 @ 5:29 pm
So you don’t have a solid definition of Islamo Fascism, is that it?
August 18th, 2007 at 5:30 pmWhen you visit a dictator and don’t ask him why he assassinated the the former President of Lebanon you must appove of everything he does.
Comment by Frank J — August 18, 2007 @ 5:23 pm
How about when you shake hands with a dictator and don’t ask him why he’s killing his own people? Does that mean you must approve of everything he does?
Rummy & Saddam
Hypocrite.
August 18th, 2007 at 5:31 pmComment by Liberator — August 18, 2007 @ 5:30 pm
Mr Pee = Radical Moron
Terminal
August 18th, 2007 at 5:31 pmThe recession began in March 2001…three months into Chimpy’s first term.
It is the Chimpy recession. Clinton and Gore had nothing to do with it.
August 18th, 2007 at 5:31 pmIslamo Fascism: The use of governments to enforce Islamic sharia law on the people. Removing all rights not found in a perverted reading of the Koran and killing all found to be non believers.
August 18th, 2007 at 5:31 pmYou know… The Histories by Herodotus.
Comment by Liberator — August 18, 2007 @ 5:27 pm
I keep telling you, Mr. Pee. Cliff Notes don’t count.
August 18th, 2007 at 5:32 pmI’ll bet he voices more regrets when he’s before a judge in the Hague!
August 18th, 2007 at 5:32 pmThe recession began in March 2001…three months into Chimpy’s first term.
It is the Chimpy recession. Clinton and Gore had nothing to do with it!
August 18th, 2007 at 5:32 pm#77: The left’s plan to fight Islamo Fascism?
First of all, “Islamo Fascism” does not exist. It’s an invention of the American right wing. Islamic fundamentalism and fascism are incompatible ideologies.
If your question is how to fight and prevent acts of terrorism, I’d begin by bringing to justice the people who carry out terrorist attacks, starting with Osama bin Laden. Remember him?
August 18th, 2007 at 5:33 pmLibs can’t tell who is friend and who is foe, so they tip-toe around anything that could possibly be politically incorrect.
Pure Liberalism = Self-Destruction
Comment by Liberator — August 18, 2007 @ 5:29 pm
Mr. Pee/Liberator = Pure Idiocy
I know who my foes are, fool, and the greatest danger is from idiots who think the Constitution is silly.
August 18th, 2007 at 5:33 pmIf anything, libtards should apologize to Rove for character assassinating him fanatically.
Comment by Pelosigetsnosexevenfromhusband —
character assassination? So then, yougetnosexasnoonewillhaveyou, you believe participating in tteason, murder, genocide and the ruination of our country is just fine? Shows what a litter Hitler you are.
August 18th, 2007 at 5:33 pmLet’s start with a rock solid definition of “Islamo Fascism,†shall we?
Comment by Zooey — August 18, 2007 @ 5:27 pm
probably supposed to be “islamo-fanaticism”,
August 18th, 2007 at 5:33 pmbut that’s too many syllables, quite a tongue twister…
…
You’d think that the President’s closet advisor would just honestly admit that his enemies are actually US citizens because they question his inability to truthfully say by name who our real enemies are. His logic is so unbelievably napalmed.
August 18th, 2007 at 5:34 pmYou deal with liberals the way they have been dealt with since 1980. You laugh at them or ignore them.
August 18th, 2007 at 5:34 pmWhen you visit a dictator and don’t ask him why he assassinated the the former President of Lebanon you must appove of everything he does.
Comment by Frank J — August 18, 2007 @ 5:23 pm
I quess that’s why had you visited Nixon you would not of asked of Allende
August 18th, 2007 at 5:34 pmIslamo Fascism: The use of governments to enforce Islamic sharia law on the people. Removing all rights not found in a perverted reading of the Koran and killing all found to be non believers.
Comment by Frank J — August 18, 2007 @ 5:31 pm
Can ya source that, Frankie? Something other than your ass, of course.
August 18th, 2007 at 5:36 pmDid Karl Rove ‘Cut & Run’?!
August 18th, 2007 at 5:36 pm#99: You deal with liberals the way they have been dealt with since 1980. You laugh at them or ignore them.
Like you’re doing, Frank?
Seems to me like you’re scrambling desperately to defend an incoherent right-wing ideology that you cannot define.
August 18th, 2007 at 5:37 pmWhat is the left’s plan to fight Islamo Fascism? Chirp……
August 18th, 2007 at 5:38 pmIslamo Fascism: The use of governments to enforce Islamic sharia law on the people. Removing all rights not found in a perverted reading of the Koran and killing all found to be non believers.
Comment by Frank J — August 18, 2007 @ 5:31 pm
Since the Iranians had a Revolution and installed their own Islamic republic, I guess we can scratch them off that list, huh? Along with all those countries like Morocco, Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan that would have Islamic fundamentalist governments if the people were allowed a democratic vote.
I’m trying to think where on the real Earth anything such as you describe might exist. Oh, wait. It doesn’t.
August 18th, 2007 at 5:38 pm#101: That is most libtarded statement I have heard all day.
So maybe you can explain how Islamic fundamentalism and fascism are compatible ideologies.
August 18th, 2007 at 5:38 pmI’m into the laughing at side of it.
August 18th, 2007 at 5:38 pmIn the wake of the resignation of Karl Rove, most media post-mortems of the architect of the Bush presidency describe his legacy as one of ultimate failure. That is, in the end Karl Rove fell short of his goal to secure a permanent Republican majority monopolizing all three branches of government for the next generation. Instead, he leaves behind a Democratic Congress and an unpopular, enfeebled President Bush.
But those accounts fail to capture the enduring dark cloud that Karl Rove has cast over the American political landscape. His grim legacy is certainly not about public policy (about which he cared little) or even about winning and losing (about which he cared a great deal). No, the indelible mark of Karl Rove is the permanent transformation and debasement of American politics itself.
For the details, see:
August 18th, 2007 at 5:39 pm“The Base Politics of Karl Rove.”
#109: I’m into the laughing at side of it.
If that’s all you were doing, you wouldn’t comment. You’d just quietly sit back and chortle to yourself.
August 18th, 2007 at 5:39 pmSo maybe you can explain how Islamic fundamentalism and fascism are compatible ideologies.
Comment by Jim — August 18, 2007 @ 5:38 pm
Keep in mind this is the bozo who thinks Jerusalem is part of Europe and that the Saudis aren’t Muslim. So “explaining” anything is going to be some form of gibberish about “libtards.”
August 18th, 2007 at 5:40 pmKeep in mind this is the bozo who thinks Jerusalem is part of Europe and that the Saudis aren’t Muslim.
Comment by gummitch
Is he also the one that went to the Ivy League School…Stanford? Or is that one of his buddies?
August 18th, 2007 at 5:42 pmprobably supposed to be “islamo-fanaticismâ€,
but that’s too many syllables, quite a tongue twister…
…
Comment by katy — August 18, 2007 @ 5:33 pm
I wonder if the Muslims have problems with bedwetters like these ignorant trolls?
August 18th, 2007 at 5:43 pm#107: I’m trying to think where on the real Earth anything such as you describe might exist. Oh, wait. It doesn’t.
Exactly. The right wing has created an ideology–called “Islamofascism”–that they think is “the enemy.” Then they attack anyone who questions this by saying, “You don’t know who the good guys and the bad guys are.”
Terrorists are clearly bad guys, but conservatives aren’t particularly interested in bringing them to justice. If they were, they would insist that we send a military force to the Afghanistan/Pakistan border to catch bin Laden. But you don’t hear conservatives clamoring for that, do you? Instead it’s all about Iraq, Iran, Syria, etc.
August 18th, 2007 at 5:43 pmThey work hand in hand. Both use psychological tools to control the control people.
Comment by Liberator
So do ad agencies, but I wouldn’t consider them terrorists.
August 18th, 2007 at 5:44 pmAfghanistan was an Islamic Fascist dictatorship before October 2001 then someone got rid of them but I can’t remember who that was.
Iran is an Islamic Fascist dictatorship. Saudi Arabia is close.
August 18th, 2007 at 5:44 pm#112: Keep in mind this is the bozo who thinks Jerusalem is part of Europe and that the Saudis aren’t Muslim. So “explaining†anything is going to be some form of gibberish about “libtards.â€
I’m beginning to see that. Sorry, I’m new to this particular troll.
August 18th, 2007 at 5:44 pmWhat is the left’s plan to fight Islamo Fascism? Chirp……
Comment by Frank J — August 18, 2007 @ 5:38 pm
Still waiting on you to source that definition, Frankie. If you can’t cite it, it’s a lie!
*crickets chirping*
August 18th, 2007 at 5:45 pmComment by Frank J
What was Iraq considered? Was it Islamo-fascist?
August 18th, 2007 at 5:46 pmIslamo Fascism: The use of governments to enforce Islamic sharia law on the people…
hoo wee… that is some amazing obtusenss…
i mean, the US invades and occupies this country, forces an election,
and what do those occupied people do???
they elect sharia law into effect…
whodda thunkit…
August 18th, 2007 at 5:47 pm.
Afghanistan was an Islamic Fascist dictatorship before October 2001 then someone got rid of them but I can’t remember who that was.
Iran is an Islamic Fascist dictatorship. Saudi Arabia is close.
Comment by Frank J — August 18, 2007 @ 5:44 pm
Since Afghanistan is no longer an “Islamic Fascist dictatorship”, we don’t have to fight that battle, do we? We’ve already established that Iran does not fit your definition, because the Islamic republic was self-imposed.
Saudi Arabia is a monarchy, bozo. But if you want to invade them, feel free to get your troll buddies and go for it.
August 18th, 2007 at 5:48 pmIraq was a neo-Stalinist dictatorship.
Comment by Liberator
Do you agree with this Frank J? Since the question was directed to you. But thanks for your input Lib.
August 18th, 2007 at 5:49 pmRove needs to come clean on a host of issues. Bush invaded Iraq without a plan, now he has no exit strategy to get out of Iraq. Bush should have fired Rove and 5 or 6 other officials who outed Plame’s covert status instead he commuted Libby’s sentence.
August 18th, 2007 at 5:52 pm#119: Iran is an Islamic Fascist dictatorship.
Which I assume is the same as “Islamofascist”?
I get the “Islamic” part. And I get the “dictatorship” part (not technically accurate, but close enough). But the “fascist” part? Nope. I don’t think that you–and all your buddies who throw around the term “Islamofascism”–have any idea what fascism is.
August 18th, 2007 at 5:52 pmI would agree Iraq under Saddam was a neo-Stalinist dictatorship that supported Al Qaeda and other Islamists because of their mutual hatred for Christians, Jews, and western civilization.
If we caught Osama Bin Laden as Bill Clinton could have done in 1998 the war against Islamo Fascism would be over? Why?
August 18th, 2007 at 5:53 pm#125: Iraq was a neo-Stalinist dictatorship.
So, in other words, we are fighting a war not against “Islamofascism,” but against “neo-Stalinism”? And you think it’s LIBERALS who have difficulty defining “the enemy”?
August 18th, 2007 at 5:54 pmFascism is an authoritarian political ideology (generally tied to a mass movement) that considers individual and other societal interests subordinate to the needs of the state, and seeks to forge a type of national unity, usually based on, but not limited to, ethnic, cultural, or racial attributes
August 18th, 2007 at 5:55 pmI would agree Iraq under Saddam was a neo-Stalinist dictatorship that supported Al Qaeda
Comment by Frank J
A stalinist dictatorship supporting a religious extremist group not under their control…..um…you might want to rethink that answer.
August 18th, 2007 at 5:57 pmHe needs to explain what Jennings was doing at the General Services administration making a presentation on how to win seats for the GOP. He must comply with Congressional subpoenas.
August 18th, 2007 at 5:57 pmWe got rid of the neo-Stalinist in three weeks. Since we have been fighting the Islamists of Al Qaeda and Iranian supported thugs. Got it?
August 18th, 2007 at 5:59 pmFascism is an authoritarian political ideology (generally tied to a mass movement) that considers individual and other societal interests subordinate to the needs of the state, and seeks to forge a type of national unity, usually based on, but not limited to, ethnic, cultural, or racial attributes
Comment by Frank J — August 18, 2007 @ 5:55 pm
Frank is this verbatim from Wikipedia? I teach my students to cite sources. Oh and wikipedia is only allowed for background but not as a cited source.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:00 pmThere were no proven ties or any connection between Saddam and bin Laden or al Qaeda.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:03 pmWe got rid of the neo-Stalinist in three weeks. Since we have been fighting the Islamists of Al Qaeda and Iranian supported thugs. Got it?
Comment by Frank J
Ya, I think I got it…..you’re off your rocker.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:04 pmI would agree Iraq under Saddam was a neo-Stalinist dictatorship that supported Al Qaeda and other Islamists because of their mutual hatred for Christians, Jews, and western civilization.
Comment by Frank J
We got rid of the neo-Stalinist in three weeks. Since we have been fighting the Islamists of Al Qaeda and Iranian supported thugs. Got it?
Comment by Frank J
In just two posts, you changes from the position that Iraq was working with al Queda to the position that al queda came in after the Stalinist gov’t was gone…….nice dancing….you should have your own show.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:06 pmSince we have been fighting the Islamists of Al Qaeda and Iranian supported thugs.
don’t forget the SAUDI ARABIAN supported thugs!
August 18th, 2007 at 6:07 pmdon’t want to leave out our buddies the saudis…
…
Told ya Frankie was stupid.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:07 pm#135: We got rid of the neo-Stalinist in three weeks. Since we have been fighting the Islamists of Al Qaeda and Iranian supported thugs.
Don’t forget Sunni insurgents (who commit most of the attacks on U.S. troops) and Shia militias.
OK, so, let me get this straight. We deposed a neo-Stalinist dictator, as part of a war against a nonexistent ideology called Islamofascism. We did this in order to attract Al-Qaeda-type terrorists and “Iranian supported thugs,” which are now wreaking havoc inside Iraq, and so that U.S. troops could die fighting off Sunni insurgents. Can you now explain how you think this is logical?
August 18th, 2007 at 6:10 pm#141: Told ya Frankie was stupid.
I should listen to you more often, Zooey. I needed to find out for myself.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:12 pmIts not logical because as a true liberal your facts are wrong.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:12 pmFrank is this verbatim from Wikipedia? I teach my students to cite sources. Oh and wikipedia is only allowed for background but not as a cited source.
Comment by dbadass — August 18, 2007 @ 6:00 pm
You didn’t think he was going to be able to define it on his own, did you?
Typically, he snipped off the bit he didn’t want: “Various scholars attribute different characteristics to fascism, but the following elements are usually seen as its integral parts: nationalism, authoritarianism, statism, militarism, corporatism, populism, totalitarianism, anti-communism, and opposition to economic and political liberalism. Racism is not a requirement of Fascism.”
Al Qaeda is corporatist? That whole “nationalism” and “statism” thing is a little sticky, as well.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:12 pmTold ya Frankie was stupid.
Comment by Zooey
No need to be so kind, Zooey.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:13 pm#144: Its not logical because as a true liberal your facts are wrong.
Facts, Frank, are by definition correct. It’s your bullshit that’s wrong.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:14 pmI was being kind in calling your delusions facts, my apology.
We have come to the point here that the moonbats don’t believe there is any threat to America and everyone else does. So where do we go from here?
August 18th, 2007 at 6:16 pmI should listen to you more often, Zooey. I needed to find out for myself.
Comment by Jim — August 18, 2007 @ 6:12 pm
Completely understandable. :-)
August 18th, 2007 at 6:17 pm…and this pertinent line from http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/fascism (at the end):
Whereas communists are considered left-wing, fascists are usually described as right-wing.
.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:18 pmWe have come to the point here that the moonbats don’t believe there is any threat to America and everyone else does. So where do we go from here?
Comment by Frank J — August 18, 2007 @ 6:16 pm
You’re letting that pendulum swing too hard, Frankie. It’s gonna fly off….
August 18th, 2007 at 6:18 pmWe have come to the point here that the moonbats don’t believe there is any threat to America and everyone else does. So where do we go from here?
Comment by Frank J
I will personally apologize to you if you can state someone in this conversation saying that there is no threat to America.
As for going somewhere…I’m getting an aspirin…reading your drivel hurts my eyes.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:18 pmPlease tell us, what “liberal” (as if its a dirty word), has stated we no longer have a threat?
August 18th, 2007 at 6:19 pm#148: We have come to the point here that the moonbats don’t believe there is any threat to America and everyone else does.
This is a straw man. An apparent attempt to climb out of your self-created pit of logical fallacies.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:20 pm#152: I will personally apologize to you if you can state someone in this conversation saying that there is no threat to America.
I for one have explicitly stated that I think Osama bin Laden is an enemy of the United States and should be brought to justice. Interestingly, none of our trolls seem to think this should be much of a priority.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:22 pm“America has to stabilize Iraq in order to prevent an all out, full-blown, pan-Muslim, genocide (the likes of which no one has ever seen).”
Kind of like the Genocide the Bushies will be committing if they get their hands on 80% of the only resource the Iraqi’s have to support themselves. The Genocide they will commit will be eliminating them through starvation and disease. They don’t care one bit about the people in Iraq. All they care about is the oil they are intent on stealing from its rightful owners.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:24 pm“Interestingly, none of our trolls seem to think this should be much of a priority.”
Comment by Jim
Ah, but wait until next year. Then, republicans will suddenly realize Osama’s capture is the Most Important Thing in the World.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:26 pmThe truth is the Bush Administration will never leave Iraq as long as they think they still have a chance at getting their hands on Iraq’s oil. If they knew for a fact that this would never happen, they would leave Iraq post haste. Unfortunately they still think they have a chance to steal Iraq’s oil so they are willing to continue to sacrifice the lives of our soldiers in pursuit of that oil. If I were a parent of a child in Iraq, I would be marching in the streets asking “how many deaths will it take till we know that too many people have died”.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:27 pm#157: Ah, but wait until next year. Then, republicans will suddenly realize Osama’s capture is the Most Important Thing in the World.
You may well be right. Of course, that wouldn’t be a bad thing in itself, since this is what they should have been doing for the past six years.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:28 pmIf we caught OBL tomorrow would the war against Islamo Fascism be over?
August 18th, 2007 at 6:28 pm#148: I was being kind in calling your delusions facts, my apology.
Uh huh.
Note that nowhere has either Frank or Liberator attempted to correct these so-called delusions. I was kind of looking forward to their clumsy attempts to do so, but not enough to feel too bad about it.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:30 pmIf we caught OBL tomorrow would the war against Islamo Fascism be over?
Comment by Frank J — August 18, 2007 @ 6:28 pm
You’re just going to pretend that whole discussion about the ridiculous terminology you’re using never happened, right?
August 18th, 2007 at 6:30 pmIf the moonbats believe there is a threat then how would they define it?
August 18th, 2007 at 6:31 pmLiberals smell bad. They need to take a shower.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:33 pmI corrected your delusion that there is no such thing as Islamo Fascism.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:33 pmSo anyway if you go to a IHOP in Texas you might run into Karl Rove shoving food down his throat? I would walk by him and throw a glass of milk on him or something.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:33 pm#160: If we caught OBL tomorrow would the war against Islamo Fascism be over?
You mean the “war” against the fictitious ideology of Islamofascism?
I think we should put boots on the ground to catch Osama bin Laden. He–and anyone else who has been involved in any terrorist attack or terrorist plot–is an enemy of the United States and should be brought to justice. I don’t believe in inventing boogeymen like “Islamofascists.” I believe in developing a clear and coherent strategy for dealing with real enemies, not your make-believe ones.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:34 pmIf the moonbats believe there is a threat then how would they define it?
Comment by Frank J
Commie-Buddhists. They’re real too.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:35 pmThat was not Saddam’s policy in the 1990s he started spreading cash around to all kinds of Islamic terrorist organizations including Al Qaeda.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:36 pmI corrected your delusion that there is no such thing as Islamo Fascism.
Comment by Frank J — August 18, 2007 @ 6:33 pm
Tsk tsk, Frankie.
You failed to source that definition, didn’t you?
August 18th, 2007 at 6:36 pmEven Pakistan claims that Osama died several years ago of kidney failure. Nobody has seen him since 2003.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:36 pmIn 1997, Seinfeld introduced Americans to the “unvitation.” The unvitation enables the cynical person to seemingly satisfy the demands of social etiquette by extending an invitation to an event or gathering which they know the recipient will - or must - reject.
As we fast forward to 2007, Americans are witnessing Republicans perfect a similar act of social hypocrisy and cynicism: the Unpology. Facing recriminations for ethical failings, racist behavior, sexist statements or outright criminality, this new generation of Republican wrong-doers delivers the facade of apology by uttering obligatory words of remorse devoid of actual regret, contrition - or even an admission of guilt.
For the details, see:
August 18th, 2007 at 6:36 pm“The Unpology: How Republicans Never Say They’re Sorry.”
“You may well be right. Of course, that wouldn’t be a bad thing in itself, since this is what they should have been doing for the past six years.”
Comment by Jim
The Chase for Bin Laden will suddenly consume all republican effort, especially if the surge hasn’t produced positive results. The Capture of Bin Laden will be a sequel that never sees the big screen - at least not as republican production.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:37 pmHi Lips:
August 18th, 2007 at 6:37 pmYou seem pretty sophisticated. Wish to discuss complex issues with insightful folks? I don’t claim to be one but there are some here who are. It’s pretty easy to tell.
Liberals hate Karl Rove because he is smarter than them.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:37 pm#165: I corrected your delusion that there is no such thing as Islamo Fascism.
You did? Maybe you can explain how Al Qaeda (which I assume is an example of an Islamofascist group) is corporatist, or nationalistic, or statist–which are key ingredients of fascism.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:37 pmHow can you tell a liberal? They smell like sh!t.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:38 pm“That was not Saddam’s policy in the 1990s he started spreading cash around to all kinds of Islamic terrorist organizations including Al Qaeda.”
Comment by Frank J —
Ba. lo. ney.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:39 pmClinton failed to capture Laden. He could have prevented 9-11.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:39 pmObviously you don’t know much about Al Qaeda if you need this explained to you. Do you really believe that Al Qaeda is not nationalistic? Statist? That is not a serious claim which makes me wonder if you believe they are a threat to the United States. Do you?
August 18th, 2007 at 6:40 pmIf Laden was an overweight intern he would have nailed it. Alas, Laden was not.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:40 pmComment by Lips
Why Mr. P, your hamper smells like a stockyard, and you talk of other’s odors?
August 18th, 2007 at 6:41 pm“That was not Saddam’s policy in the 1990s he started spreading cash around to all kinds of Islamic terrorist organizations including Al Qaeda.
Comment by Frank J ”
Hey Francine - It would make a much better impression when you say stuff like this if you were to prove it. Link please or some evidence that Saddam every gave money to al Qaeda or any other “Islamic terrorist organization”.
Just because you say it DOESN’T make it true.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:41 pm#169: That was not Saddam’s policy in the 1990s he started spreading cash around to all kinds of Islamic terrorist organizations including Al Qaeda.
This run-on, incoherent piece of crap is false, whether you put the semicolon after “policy” or after “1990s.” There is not, nor was there ever, any documented relationship between Iraq and Al Qaeda. Nor would there have been any reason for such a relationship, as Saddam Hussein wasn’t exactly known for his willingness to share power.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:42 pmSaddam partnered with Al Qaeda and had a friendship with Laden.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:42 pmJust because you say it DOESN’T make it true.
Comment by bilbobaggins
But to Frankie…if Rush says it…it has to be true.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:42 pmBarfly needs to take a shower. He’s a liberal.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:43 pmLips:
August 18th, 2007 at 6:43 pmYour falling a little flat. Why not try a line of “How many libs does it take to…’ gags? Trust me, you’ll slay em
Saddam partnered with Al Qaeda and had a friendship with Laden.
Comment by Lips —
Saddam was friends with Dr. Greg Laden? Who would have known.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:44 pmThe only thing Clinton “got” was an std.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:45 pm“Clinton failed to capture Laden. He could have prevented 9-11.
Comment by Lips”
George Herbert Walker Bush (Bush 41) failed to capture Bin Laden. He could have prevented 9-11.
George W. Bush was issued a memo, while on vacation in August 2001, that Bin Laden was determined to strike in the US. What did he do? He stayed on vacation. George W. Bush could have prevented 9-11.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:45 pmBush let bin Laden go at Tora Bora when he outsourced the job to Afghan warlords instead of letting our troops do it. He was wrong to do so.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:46 pm#186: We executed a neo-Stalinist dictator (Saddam Hussein) and we continue to fight Islamofascists.
If the war is against Islamofascism, why did we attack a country led by a neo-Stalinist dictator?
August 18th, 2007 at 6:46 pmbilbobaggins is a liberal. Ergo, he is a liar.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:46 pmClinton nailed a fat intern. He failed to nail Laden.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:47 pmLips:
August 18th, 2007 at 6:47 pmYou dying out there friend. Go ethnic Go ethnic!
I’m done with this thread. I’m knee deep in the Troll Poop and need to go take a bath.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:47 pmI think Frank, in his inept manner, is trying the old “but Saddam gave money to Palestinian bombers,” ignoring the fact that Saddam gave money to the families of Palestinian bombers who had been driven from their homes by Israeli bulldozers, often in complete ignorance of what their relatives had done - until the bulldozers arrived.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:47 pmAccording to the NIE al Qaeda based in Afghanistan is back to its original strength since before 9-11. This is Bush’s fault.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:47 pm#197: Clinton … failed to nail Laden.
I’m pretty sure it’s “bin Laden,” not “Laden.” It’s kind of like saying “Cain” when you mean “McCain.”
August 18th, 2007 at 6:48 pmbilobobaggins you need a shower not a bath. You smell like sh!t because you are a liberal.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:49 pmIf Bush would have taken the August 2001 briefing seriously he could have taken steps to prevent 9-11.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:49 pm#199: I’m done with this thread. I’m knee deep in the Troll Poop and need to go take a bath.
I’m going to need to be hosed off.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:49 pmLiberals blame everything on Bush. They are failures and need somebody to blame.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:50 pm#206: Liberals blame everything on Bush.
That’s not true. I don’t blame Bush for the fact that Karl Rove is disgustingly fat.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:51 pm9-11 happened when Bush was president. He failed to protect the American people.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:51 pmRove is thin compared to Jim.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:51 pmComment by Lips
Someone should seek help for their unhealthy feces fixation, and stop transfering their pathology onto others.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:52 pmIf Clinton nailed Laden instead of an intern there would have been no 9-11.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:52 pmWell, you know the old saying, “Loose Lips, must be Pip’s.”
August 18th, 2007 at 6:52 pmbarfly suffers from projection because he is a liberal.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:52 pm#209: Rove is thin compared to Jim.
I’m quite svelte, thank you very much.
Not that you’d have any way of knowing.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:52 pmBush closed down the CIA unit that was responsible for finding and killing bin Laden.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:53 pmJim is also quite gay.
August 18th, 2007 at 6:53 pmLips:
August 18th, 2007 at 6:53 pmIt still isn’t working for ya. I suggest self deprecation the last refuge of a poor comic