Attention, Karl. You may remember that, before you got your security clearance, you were trained how to protect Secret information. I know you received this training because Everyone who gets a security clearance receives this training. It’s mandatory. As part of that training you were instructed not to confirm secret information, because, even if you are not the first person to divulge a secret, then confirming secret information is … well, confirming secret information.

When you have a Security clearance, and you confirm information that is supposed to be Secret, then you’ve committed a felony, and at the very least your clearance should be immediately revoked. Unless you work for George W. Bush, in which case Laws Are For Other People.

With the departure of Karl Rove, the stench of failure hangs over the president – and his party wants to ignore the smell

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/story/0,,2152380,00.html

Seen as other posters have already supplied links for you to peruse, I will leave it at this:

You have argued that America was attacked and therefore the invasion of Iraq was retaliatory. Except, not a one of the hijackers on 9/11 was from Iraq. They were mostly Saudis. Further, Saddam was a known enemy of Osama Bin Laden at the time.

Thus, I have to ask whether your reasoning is due to you being misinformed, or simply racist (They are all Arabs! …sort-of.)

I’m glad I moved away from Texas! I could be accused for “anticipating” the deaths that Pres. Bush is encouraging!

· Controversial state law led to murder conviction
· Accomplice had sat in car 25 metres from shooting

Dan Glaister in Los Angeles
Monday August 20, 2007
The Guardian

Texas is poised to execute a man for a crime he did not commit. While the perpetrator of the murder in San Antonio was executed last year, Kenneth Foster, who was sitting in a car 25 metres away at the time of the shooting, was sentenced to death under the “law of parties”.
The controversial Texas law removes the distinction between the principal actor and accomplice in a crime, and makes a person guilty if they “should have anticipated” the crime.

One thing my public school education taught me that you obviously have yet to learn is the difference between a question mark (?) and a period (.), 阿呆！

Such as the Nobel Prize-winning scientist who graduated from the same public high school as I, the four and seven Nobel Prize-winning scientists who respectively graduated from Stuyvesant High and the Bronx High School of Science, both NYC public schools, mikey? How many Nobel Prize laureates attended your supposedly superior private (or home) school, or Pepperdine, the university you claim to have attended? I know it’s zero in the latter case, and undoubtedly the same in the former case, too.

[I say that a lot]

Comment by Bodhittsatva — August 20, 2007 @ 2:12 am

I think you’re being a little too harsh on him. I’m sure his interpretation of history is slanted by his wacko views, but I don’t think he’ll cause as much damage on his blog as he does here. It’s a good use of his time, and I’m sure he’ll get better as he goes along.

I have a genealogy blog where I keep track of my progress and share some of the things I’ve learned. I’m kind of lazy about documenting my sources there as well, which is kind of a bad habit, but it’s my blog and I do what I like. I’m always happy to provide documentation to anyone who requests it however.

I bet Pee would do the same.

Thanks, Egg.

Heh. I’m just impoverishing myself by not working. It’s loads easier that way. :)

Goodnight, my friend.

Good luck with school! I envy you. I’m too lazy to go back to school. I took one class a couple of years ago, and I think I may have took it too seriously. I was exhausted during the last term, trying to go to school and work full time, walking back and forth to each. I’m kinda lame.

Makarios, you know I was sincere about your blog. It really is very nice. I wish you the best of success with it.

Comment by Egreggious — August 20, 2007 @ 2:07 am

Actually, it is just the ultimate Reichtwing site, that attempts to go back in time and re-write history. All the text is just Madcowious’ opinion, but spewed as dogma. There is no way to go back and research without a huge undertaking, because he leaves off his trail of references. Not a citation or reference for any quotes or statements of fact.
Just another piece of shit (yeah may look good,) but a little TOO good, if you catch my drift.

PROPAGANDA to unlearn the mighty masses.

Yes! School starts tomorrow. Can’t wait!

Good night to all!

Comment by Egreggious — August 20, 2007 @ 1:53 am

Rrrrovian organization sent you…no?

I like that:
R.O.V.E.
Really Obnoxious Vexatious Entities.

Almost like C.H.A.O.S. from Get Smart