Think Progress

Senate to hold hearings on Utah mine collapse.

When Congress returns, the Senate Appropriations subcommittee that oversees labor issues will hold hearings on the collapse in a Utah mine that caused six coal miners to go missing. The committee wants mine co-owner Bob Murray to answer questions about the safety of the mine and “whether mining should have been conducted at Crandall Canyon at all because of the potential for collapses.”

UPDATE: Huffington Post notes that, after 17 days of silence, CNN finally offered a critical look into Murray’s record.



114 Responses to “Senate to hold hearings on Utah mine collapse.”

  1. Liberalism Causes AIDS says:

    This is a waste of mother%*$#@*& tax dollars!

    Everyone knows that Cheney was conducting secret underground nuclear tests which caused the mine collapse. That or his weather machine was set too high.


  2. Conpervative says:

    Everyone knows that Murray wants to collect insurance money and could care less about worker safety!!

    And it wasn’t an underground test, it was Limbaugh falling out of his chair when he took too much oxycodone.


  3. Conpervative says:

    Crandall, ruh roh, bad juju!


  4. Conpervative says:

    This is a waste of mother%*$#@*& tax dollars -LCA

    So apparently was the TALON program. And so is your welfare state of Iraq. Besides once Murray pays the big ass fine he’s gonna get it’ll all work out.


  5. RUCerious says:

    Bush will claim executive mining privilege.


  6. WaltTheMan says:

    Whenever I get a glimpse of this Murray character, I get a sudden desire to sprinkle table salt on him. Never been able to tell what he most resembles – Jaba the Hut or a slug.


  7. Makarios says:

    This is why the Democrat Congress has 0% approval.


  8. i LOVE mine owner Bob Murray! says:

    I can see the future for I am a clairvoyant: as soon as these pork barrel-spending, military-hating, gay-subserving Democrats conduct another useless and asinine hearing when their vacation is over, the Dem-controlled Congress’ ratings will go into the SINGLE-DIGITS! I read in a libtarded-leaning AP article earlier this week that regarding anything that could’ve been done differently with the mine, the only thing Murray could’ve done was to hand over communications responsibilities to the MSHA. This means that bringing in MSHA would only have resulted in consolidating and streamlining the updates on search efforts, but it wouldn’t have changed the doomed status of the miners. Watch for the psycho Dems, however, to plot and shift the blame for the whole collapse–all the fault of structural problems Murray allegedly didn’t know about–onto Bush and the MSHA. This will prove that Demoncrats manufacture strawman arguments out of pure $hit.


  9. RUCerious says:

    CNN/Opinion Research Corporation Poll. Aug. 6-8, 2007. N=approx. 500 adults nationwide. MoE ± 4.5.

    “Do you have more confidence in President Bush or in the Democrats in Congress to deal with the major issues facing the country today?”

    8/6-8/07

    President
    Bush 35

    Democrats
    In Congress 48

    Both (vol.) 3

    Neither (vol.) 12

    Unsure 2

    This is a little more perspective for Makarios to shove somewhere…


  10. Dave C says:

    Markarios isn’t interested in facts, or differing viewpoints. He can’t even answer simple questions on such basic things as “do the Reps support the troops?” That gets his panties all in a knot because it’s not “on topic”. Coward. Join the Army or STFU.


  11. Makarios says:

    Comment by RUCerious — August 23, 2007 @ 6:50 pm

    That poll is bogus. According to your info, only 14% don’t approve of either congress or Bush… we all know that ain’t true!!!

    Nice try.
    .


  12. Makarios says:

    Comment by Dave C — August 23, 2007 @ 6:57 pm

    ummm…

    No. I think I’ll do as I please, douche.


  13. RUCerious says:

    Comment by Makarios — August 23, 2007 @ 6:57 pm

    You really are a dumbfu(k.
    That’s a CNN poll, asswipe. You got something better?


  14. Dave C says:

    No. I think I’ll do as I please

    Of course you will. No one can force you into manhood. Just like no one can force you into the armed forces… yet. Coward.


  15. Alfred E. Neumann says:

    What, me, understand the word More?


  16. Raven says:

    I can see Murray now, wringing his hands, cowing before the Committee, saying:

    “It’s evil, m’lords, the mine is EVIL I tell you!


  17. Uncle Smokes says:

    six coal miners to go missing

    “Go missing” is too tepid. How about “six coal miners to be abandoned for dead like it was the 19th century and the labor movement never happened?”

    Labor Day is coming soon, and it’s worth noting that the movement in the United States started with the coal miners. Look how far we’ve regressed.

    Oh well, let’s have a cookout.


  18. Makarios says:

    That’s a CNN poll

    Comment by RUCerious — August 23, 2007 @ 6:58 pm

    So?


  19. elvis_p says:

    More hearings…yawn. Way to go Congress. This administration has all but eliminated Congressional oversight. Is anybody there that knows what to do with the unique moments they find themselves in? Sure the GOP is the least respected institution in the US right now and worldwide probably second only to al Qaeda, and yes the Democrats took over the hill for several compelling reasons, but…when is someone like Leahy going to stop making threats every other week and actually follow through?


  20. RUCerious says:

    What level of education did you claim to have?
    Ever take statistics or math?


  21. Makarios says:

    Comment by RUCerious — August 23, 2007 @ 7:06 pm

    Sure.



  22. Makarios says:

    Comment by ccokz — August 23, 2007 @ 7:08 pm

    No.


  23. Conpervative says:

    No. Comment by Makarios

    When a troll says no it means yes.


  24. Makarios says:

    When a troll says no it means yes.

    Comment by Conpervative — August 23, 2007 @ 7:11 pm

    Yes.


  25. john m says:

    Does every major news scandal have to go before Congress now?

    I hear that dogfighting guy was hiding something.


  26. nanlichi says:

    I work in the coal mining industry and I have met Murray, and I can say for a fact that no other company in the US will do retreat mining. It’s too dangerous. It’s the cheapest coal available, unless you throw in the cost of paying all the claims.

    China does it though, and they lose several hundred workers a year.

    My company walks away from the mine and leaves the pillars intact.


  27. Conpervative says:

    WOWSEY. I actually got 15 words into this looney tin-foil truth detector rant;
    I can see the future for I am a clairvoyant: as soon as these pork
    before I stopped reading the looney tin foil truth detector conspiracy bilge.


  28. Conpervative says:

    No. I think I’ll do as I please and douche.
    Comment by Makarios

    Thanks, it was getting a little rotten in Denmark.


  29. Shawn says:

    Typical grandstanding effort on the part of Congress. Rather than tackle substantive issues, they’ll get a few soundbites off and do nothing.


  30. shane says:

    This is a little more perspective for Makarios to shove somewhere…

    Comment by RUCerious — August 23, 2007 @ 6:50 pm

    I don’t think there’s any more room up his arse. What with his head and CT both lodged so firmly up there.


  31. shane says:

    Markarios isn’t interested in facts, or differing viewpoints. He can’t even answer simple questions on such basic things as “do the Reps support the troops?” That gets his panties all in a knot because it’s not “on topic”. Coward. Join the Army or STFU.

    Comment by Dave C — August 23, 2007 @ 6:57 pm

    Mackeralhead is complaining about others staying “on topic”? Oh that is too funny.


  32. thoughtcriminal says:

    Stupid republican sheep obviously can’t read or follow the trail of dead when it comes to their beloved nazi overlords. Just lick the boot, look the other way and let their cowardly traitors nail another board to the coffin of this country they claim to love so much.

    “Robert Murray insists that his company did not change the mining plan at Crandall Canyon after purchasing a joint interest in the mine last August.
    But documents obtained by The Salt Lake Tribune clearly contradict Murray’s assertion, and show that Murray’s company sought and received approval from federal regulators to make a significant, and, experts say, risky change to the mining strategy.”

    “Records of the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) show that, after Murray acquired a 50 percent ownership in the mine on Aug. 9, 2006, his company repeatedly petitioned the agency to allow coal to be extracted from the north and south barriers – thick walls of coal that run on both sides of the main tunnels and help hold up the mine.”

    http://www.sltrib.com/news/ci_6685703

    As it turns out, the Bu$h appointed MHSA granted permission for this dangerous and probably illegal operation.

    THAT is the reason for the hearings, I hope somebody fries for it, preferably someone high up.

    After you are done with that one, try this, whistleblowers back in 2005 were warning about this, exposing even more Bu$h crony-ism in his appointments of energy industry executives and CEO’s to head up Mine Safety. And you republican clowns still don’t make the correlation between corrupt business practices and humans dying.

    “In 2002, Bush named former Massey Energy official Stanley Suboleski to the MSHA review commission that decides all legal matters under the Federal Mine Act. Massey Energy is one of the largest coal companies in the U.S and has been cited for numerous violations. And David Lauriski, the former head of MSHA, spent 30 years as an executive in the mining industry before being tapped to head the agency. He resigned last year to work for a mine-industry consulting company. The current head of MSHA, Richard Stickler, was appointed by Bush last September. Stickler is a former manager of Beth Energy mines. The Bush administration has also cut 170 positions from MSHA.”

    http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=06/01/05/1455200

    You trolls (you know who you are) come to this board to derail real conversations and stifle enlightening debate with your childish and often traitorous ill-informed (or worse) nonsense. You offer nothing but insults, lies and sheepish cowardice just like the government that you support- hook, line, and sinker. I feel sorry for you, I feel sorry for your children and I feel sorry for this country that is being destroyed while you tow the line and insult people who care enough to call these fools on their lies, murders and treachery.

    @#$%^%^@%!!!


  33. pete says:

    Mr. Pus is gonna douche?

    And I thought Dr. Frankenfurter was confused.


  34. Zooey says:

    Does the committee have a goal in mind, or are they just holding a hearing?


  35. Zooey says:

    Comment by thoughtcriminal — August 23, 2007 @ 7:41 pm

    Well ranted, thoughtcriminal. :-)


  36. Makarios says:

    Funny!

    CT hasn’t been here all week, but shane can’t stop talking about him!!!

    ShaneCT!!!!


  37. Mycelium says:

    Thanks # 32

    From what I saw of his interview with CNN’s AC, Murphy seemed like a lying scumbag. AC backed him in to a pretty good corner and he squirmed. (Something about changing mine practices to allow retreat mining when Murphy took over last year…denied knowledge of everything even when AC told him of documents.) Showed him in a past testimony too…what a peach!

    Sure the Senate should have hearings in the appropriate committee. Murphy is one of the worst in the business for over-all safety violations. Mining is dangerous enough without cutting corners and taking risks for greater profit. With all the new coal-fired powerhouses being built as we speak, there is plenty of profit in coal.


  38. ronjazz says:

    No. I think I’ll do as I please, douche.

    Comment by Makarios — August 23, 2007 @ 6:57 pm

    We’re not interested in your personal habits.


  39. shane says:

    CT hasn’t been here all week, but shane can’t stop talking about him!!!

    Shane ♥ CT!!!!

    Comment by Makarios — August 23, 2007 @ 7:46 pm

    1. Nobody believes anything you say.

    2. It is your jealousy that makes you think anybody likes CT.

    3. Why don’t you two get a room?

    4. Nobody believes anything you say.


  40. grover nerdquist says:

    uh h, dont tell me Leahy’s gonna write a letter!


  41. shane says:

    For too many years the Republican led congress did no oversight. Now that they are doing the job they’re supposed to do the neocons are crying that they’re doing it.


  42. Makarios says:

    It is your jealousy that makes you think anybody likes CT.

    Jealousy? How so?


  43. ronjazz says:

    Dance, malarkios, dance! You’re slowing down! Get those lies up to speed! Dance or you’ll be flunked out, again! Come on, monkey-liar, spin, pirouette, flaunt that tutu!


  44. JMiller says:

    Why is this a federal issue?

    Yes there should be a bevvy of legal concerns pursuing this, but how is congress the appropriate forum?


  45. thoughtcriminal says:

    #41, exactly.

    Deregulate everything, just like Ronald McReagan said, and this is the result you get. Free market? HA! More like “Free to Kill As Long As It Reaps in Billions In Profits”

    sad state this country is in…


  46. shane says:

    Dance, malarkios, dance! You’re slowing down! Get those lies up to speed! Dance or you’ll be flunked out, again! Come on, monkey-liar, spin, pirouette, flaunt that tutu!

    Comment by ronjazz — August 23, 2007 @ 7:57 pm

    He’s too fat to dance. He just likes wearing the tutu around the basement. I guess the idiot got kicked out of community college. Probably because of his antisocial behavior.


  47. Abby says:

    How do you ensure a complete cover-up of anything and everything you like in America? You initiate a bi-partisan investigation! Bi-partisan investigations can decide on the outcome they want and then ensure that the “investigation” comes to that outcome. Need any examples?

    Independent investigations dig too deeply and could end up with the inconvenient truth. Nobody wants that.


  48. Spudge_Boy says:

    No. I think I’ll do as I please, douche.

    Comment by Makarios — August 23, 2007 @ 6:57 pm

    I didn’t know that traitors needed to douche. Weird is that some kind of a troll fetish? How often does a traitor douche? I am just wondering, because I thought this troll was a gay guy all along. Turns out he needs to douche constantly. Learn something new everyday.


  49. gummitch says:

    I work in the coal mining industry and I have met Murray, and I can say for a fact that no other company in the US will do retreat mining. It’s too dangerous. It’s the cheapest coal available, unless you throw in the cost of paying all the claims.

    China does it though, and they lose several hundred workers a year.

    Comment by nanlichi — August 23, 2007 @ 7:20 pm

    Actually, China is much worse. In a news article on the most recent disaster, where the mines were flooded, it was reported that roughly 2,000 Chinese miners have died already this year.

    Of course, it may be that they weren’t all coal miners.


  50. bilbogaggins says:

    I hope that the survivors of those killed in this mine sue the pants off Murray. I’m fairly sure they will win since their is a lot of evidence that he knew that mining where they were was very risky.


  51. bilbogaggins says:

    Typical grandstanding effort on the part of Congress. Rather than tackle substantive issues, they’ll get a few soundbites off and do nothing.
    Comment by Shawn

    You don’t think the death of 9 people, possibly due to gross negligence, to be a substantive issue? What is a substantive issue to you?


  52. bilbogaggins says:

    Comment by thoughtcriminal “

    Kudos! Very well said.


  53. trueblue says:

    Spudge_Boy,

    As I’m sure you already know, douching is totally unnecessary as that particular organ is “self clean”.

    Makarios, however, may need to flush that dirtier area, especially after any “encounter.” (**cough jeff ganon**cough **karl rove**)


  54. Makarios says:

    Oh, hello trueblue!

    *squirt* *squirt* **SPLASH!!!**


  55. RUCerious says:

    If the mistakes and risktaking of this company can be brought to light, and it saves other miner’s lives, why wouldn’t that be a good use of Congress’ time and energy. They’re not going to impeach the criminals in charge, so investigate away!


  56. Zooey says:

    Oh, hello trueblue!
    *squirt* *squirt* **SPLASH!!!**
    Comment by Makarios — August 23, 2007 @ 9:02 pm

    Please explain what that means, Pee.


  57. Makarios says:

    Please explain what that means, Pee.

    Comment by Zooey — August 23, 2007 @ 9:09 pm

    Well, first of all, it ain’t pee.


  58. Dave C says:

    Please explain what that means, Pee.

    It means he’s a moron.


  59. RUCerious says:

    Well, first of all, it ain’t pee.
    Comment by Makarios — August 23, 2007 @ 9:10 pm

    Sure it is. You’re the Archbishop of Urine.


  60. pete says:

    Well, It looks like Mr. Pus is in full melt down. I bid all you humans goodnight. And you too Mr. Pus!


  61. Zooey says:

    Well, first of all, it ain’t pee.
    Comment by Makarios — August 23, 2007 @ 9:10 pm

    Uh huh Mr Pee, go on.


  62. Dave C says:

    Well, first of all, it ain’t pee.

    As if it matters which moron you are today.


  63. Brittany Hume says:

    “*squirt* *squirt* **SPLASH!!!**”
    sounds like Macaroon is blogging from the can with a bad case of the hershey squirts


  64. RUCerious says:

    Methinks the Archbishop would like for true to kiss his Bishopric.


  65. had enough says:

    #

    What level of education did you claim to have?
    Ever take statistics or math?

    Comment by RUCerious — August 23, 2007 @ 7:06 pm
    #

    Comment by RUCerious — August 23, 2007 @ 7:06 pm

    Sure.

    Comment by

    Makarios is a known useless jerk… not worth one letter of text.


  66. Makarios says:

    Uh huh Mr Pee, go on.

    Comment by Zooey — August 23, 2007 @ 9:12 pm

    You’d understand better if you had some hands on experience. If I explained over the internet it wouldn’t be the same.


  67. Makarios says:

    As if it matters which moron you are today.

    Comment by Dave C — August 23, 2007 @ 9:13 pm

    Man, you are dumb.


  68. RUCerious says:

    Mak certainly can’t interpret a simple preference poll, one must have questions about his intellectual prowess.


  69. trueblue says:

    Makarios is soooo not worth the bandwidth.

    He’s a sick#$%^& with sicker fantasies.


  70. gummitch says:

    Mak certainly can’t interpret a simple preference poll, one must have questions about his intellectual prowess.

    Comment by RUCerious — August 23, 2007 @ 9:16 pm

    I have no questions about his “intellectual prowess” because he’s demonstrated over probably thousands of comments that he possesses none. Zero. Zip. Nada.


  71. Zooey says:

    You’d understand better if you had some hands on experience. If I explained over the internet it wouldn’t be the same.
    Comment by Makarios — August 23, 2007 @ 9:15 pm

    Well, I don’t need a life-like experience, Mr Pee. You’re good with words, go ahead. I’m waiting.


  72. Makarios says:

    Comment by RUCerious — August 23, 2007 @ 9:16 pm

    I already told you, that poll is crap.


  73. RUCerious says:

    Could you enlighten us as to the flaws you see in it?
    Re: post #9


  74. Dave C says:

    Could you enlighten us as to the flaws you see in it?

    Bush’s numbers are too high.


  75. Zooey says:

  76. Makarios says:

    Could you enlighten us as to the flaws you see in it?
    Re: post #9

    Comment by RUCerious — August 23, 2007 @ 9:20 pm
    ————————————

    All the numbers are too high, except for the “neither” option. Even you libs know that.


  77. Makarios says:

  78. GSD says:

    Attention all Bush trolls. Due to the crackdown on immigrants the corporate masters are short on lettuce pickers and coal miners.

    Please report to your nearest Halliburton Relocation and Re-education Camp for new assignments.

    -GSD


  79. Snake Plisken says:

    Archbishop Makarios? I heard you were dead.


  80. Makarios says:

    Comment by Snake Plisken — August 23, 2007 @ 9:27 pm

    That’s a different dude.

    (by the way, nice job saving LA)


  81. bluseahorse says:

    why bother? why bother? was it not only approx 2 years ago the Sego mine tragedy happened and what changed, what changed? This slime bucket will get a slap on the wrist, if that much., and give another
    infomercial about the importance of coal over alternative energies to save this dying planet, which is dying in more way than one. I am at the point of saying, “yeah, right, whatever” ….go have your hearing. Don’t forget to break for lunch.


  82. Snake Plisken says:

    Sorry, missed that comment. Put my patch on the wrong eye again.


  83. Mike says:

    This is Ted Frank
    (prepare yourself for ugly reichwing douchebag)

    Ted Frank (a.k.a. THF) Has Altered the ‘SiCKO’ Wikipedia Page 96 Times

    http://www.michaelmoore.com/


  84. bluseahorse says:

    Response to # 16, : correct, but let’s not forget to go to bed early the night before Labor Day, as they may open the shopping malls extra early, like 1:00 a.m., so we can GO SHOPPING at WALMART’S before we have the cookout. That’ll be fun! :(


  85. GSD says:

    Yer doin’ a heckuva job Murray.

    -The Deshider


  86. David Beckham says:

    Saving LA? No Jesus saves LA, and I cleared the rebound.


  87. RUCerious says:

    All the numbers are too high, except for the “neither” option. Even you libs know that.

    Comment by Makarios — August 23, 2007 @ 9:24 pm

    OK, read along with us.
    “Do you have more confidence in President Bush or in the Democrats in Congress to deal with the major issues facing the country today?”

    They are asking the respondents which one they have more confidence in
    Bush got 35% having more confidence in him, and the Dem Congress got 48%.

    I’ll admit that 3% saying both is wierd, but neither = and don’t know = 2, all total up to 100%, so explain how the number are too high?>???


  88. Makarios says:

    Comment by RUCerious — August 23, 2007 @ 9:35 pm

    In reality, more people would say neither.


  89. JJ says:

    Murray ought to be rooting for truffles


  90. RUCerious says:

    So the 500 adults they interviewed are all wrong and you’re right?


  91. Zooey says:

    Mr Pee,

    You still haven’t explained your squirting episode…..


  92. Dave C says:

    Makarios only considers polls valid that confirm his current beliefs.


  93. RUCerious says:

    Can you tell me which of the 500 were supposed to say neither, instead of choosing Bush or the Congress>?
    CNN would also like to interview you on this. Go down to their Atlanta HQ and ask to rebut their poll on national news.


  94. RUCerious says:

    Oh, and BTW, how was your fake flight to Austin Tx last wekeend?
    Was the fake landing too rough? Was there fake turbulence?
    Did it interefere with your fake wifi on your fake notebook?


  95. Ben Dover says:

    I’m all for hearings if they result in any action being taken. Thus far, however, we have had a zillion hearings into the wrong doing of the Bushies but not one of those bastards has paid a fine or spent a second in jail. So whats the point? The owner of this mine is well known for not caring an iota for worker safety. And the slob who is in charge of the Mine Safety agency managed mines that had 2 times the normal number of safety violations. Just what exactly will come out of the hearings? More evidence of how corrupt and inept the Bush Administration is and remains, yet not a damned thing will change. So what is the point?


  96. RUCerious says:

    Ya know Mak, if you need to emulate crazy religious figures, Rasputin was a monk…Just sayin.


  97. ronjazz says:

    In reality, more people would say neither.

    Comment by Makarios — August 23, 2007 @ 9:41 pm

    In reality, you should douche more often.


  98. Makarios says:

    So the 500 adults they interviewed are all wrong and you’re right?

    Comment by RUCerious — August 23, 2007 @ 9:46 pm

    Is that a question?



  99. alp3 says:

    your test came through, mak.

    now, why should anyone care?


  100. Makarios says:

    now, why should anyone care?

    Comment by alp3 — August 23, 2007 @ 10:12 pm

    About what?


  101. MapleStreet says:

    The collapse of the mine doesn’t provide disproof that the private sector, when left to its own devices, will provide better wages and a safer work environment than it would under govt regulation.

    I do believe in fairies. I do, I do, I do.


  102. alp3 says:

    say, mak.

    i’d like to know. why does a little bopper like yourself feel
    that your chickenhawk stance has a smidgen of validity, while
    you’re too young to fight your own battles.

    tell me, p … what gives you your gusto?


  103. Makarios says:

    Comment by alp3 — August 23, 2007 @ 10:17 pm

    Are you even human?


  104. alp3 says:

    answer the question, little one.


  105. Makarios says:

    what gives you your gusto?

    Comment by alp3 — August 23, 2007 @ 10:17 pm

    Cheetos and Red Bull.


  106. alp3 says:

  107. Tracy says:

    What really caused the mine to collapse?


  108. Jay Randal says:

    The hearings on the Utah mine collapse can serve a purpose, if the criminality of Bob Murray is exposed and his company de-licensed. If nothing is done to him, then the entire Congress would be wise to all commit suicide in the Crandall Canyon Mine together. The mountain would crush them all to death.


  109. Zooey says:

    What really caused the mine to collapse?
    Comment by Tracy — August 23, 2007 @ 11:05 pm

    Unsafe mining practices, and an unstable mountain.


  110. dbadass says:

    Although I feel for the families and all involved I hope that this tragedy does not in anyway encourage any increase in mountain top removal mining.


  111. esther says:

    bob Murray’s not the problem. The problem is MSHA who allowed him to operate.

    The previous mine owner had not even attempted to mine in the corridor where this collapse occurred because the owner thought it was too dangerous. But MSHA approved a plan previously rejected by the owners as too dangerous. What does that tell you about the agency that is supposed to be in charge of safety, rejecting a plan rejected by owners whose main priority is making money.


  112. scooter says:

    It all depends on who is in charge,,,
    if you got a democrat in the white house then,,, any worker accident or industrial mishap is “just an accident”..

    on the other hand,,, if you got the republican,,, well then,,, you know what happens…

    The AFL/CIO has no hand in how any of this plays out…YEP



Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2009 Center for American Progress Action Fund
View Most Popular

Advertisement

What We're About

Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report



imageTopic Cloud


Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
Reports


Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll