Foley likely to face no charges.
By on Aug 24th, 2007 at 6:37 pm
Foley likely to face no charges.
Scripps Howard News Service reports that former congressman Mark Foley “is unlikely to face criminal charges for sending sexually explicit e-mails to teenage boys. … That could change if new evidence surfaces in the next week that proved Foley, 52, sent online messages to male teenagers with the intent to ’seduce, solicit, lure, entice, or attempt to seduce a child,’ a third-degree felony under Florida law.” The House has refused to let Florida investigators examine Foley’s congressional computers, stating that they are “congressional work papers” and only Foley can release them.
View Most Popular
Advertisement
What We're About
What We're Fighting For
What We're Fighting Against
Featured
Subscribe to the Progress Report
Topic CloudView topics sorted by popularity
Afghanistan
Bachmann
Beck
Boehner
Bush
Cheney
Civil Rights
Congress
Corporate Ethics
Dobbs
Economy
Education
Election
Energy
Environment
Ethics
Fox News
Gingrich
Glenn Beck
Global Warming
Health Care
Immigration
International Relations
Iraq
Kristol
LGBT
Lieberman
Limbaugh
Maddow
McCain
Media
Military
Obama
Palin
Pelosi
Public Plan
Race
Radical Right
Religion
Sports
Steele
Stimulus
Tea Parties
Technology
Women's Rights
Visit Our Affiliated Sites
Reports
In-depth studies on select topics
Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.
ArchivesBlog Roll
another fine example of our congress working for us. sorry, working for the criminal, to harm us. and you think you have representation?
August 24th, 2007 at 6:39 pmI am shocked, shocked I tell you.
That’s just wrong. Any regular citizen would end up having his house raided and every computer confiscated 5 minutes after the warrant was signed.
Maybe the guy from Dateline NBC will set up a sting, and they can catch the pervert that way.
August 24th, 2007 at 6:45 pmCue the trolls saying what a fine man Foley is, and the page was of age….. *yawn*
August 24th, 2007 at 6:45 pmMr P.,
What are you wearing?
August 24th, 2007 at 6:46 pmHis accusation that Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) knew that Gobie had operated a prostitution service out of Frank’s Capitol Hill apartment became national news after it was first reported Friday by the Washington Times
Dems love hypocrites.
August 24th, 2007 at 6:49 pmFoley can truly say he was the finest legispredator ever to serve in the House.
August 24th, 2007 at 6:49 pmMaybe Barney Frank can help his fellow homo out.
Comment by Bob
Or Karl Rove or Ken Mehlman or “Jeff Gannon” or George W. Bush…
August 24th, 2007 at 6:51 pmContact Nancy Pelosi and tell her to release Foley’s records. What are we trying to accomplish, if not transparency in government concerning the lead up to the war, no-bid contracts, etc., so why protect a sexual predator. Let the investigators examine His congressional computers.
August 24th, 2007 at 6:52 pmMr P.,
What are you wearing?
Comment by Troll Lover
A Caesar salad jock strap
August 24th, 2007 at 6:55 pmGood to see the GOP protect their child molesters I know Dennis Hastert is happy. Now more kids can get attacked by Fingers Foley.
August 24th, 2007 at 6:58 pmOnly one problem for Fingers he used his email message to a kid in California. Now yes Florida doesn’t mine perverts molesting their children but California does. Fingers Foley will be changed in California and even Governor Arie can’t save Fingers Foley from this charge. Some States don’t like Congressmen molesting kids even if the Attorney General Gonzales doesn’t see it as a crime.
His accusation that Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) knew that Gobie had operated a prostitution service out of Frank’s Capitol Hill apartment became national news after it was first reported Friday by the Washington Times
Dems love hypocrites.
Comment by Bob — August 24, 2007 @ 6:49 pm
His accusation was also false. You’re the hypocrite, liar. Fact-free, like all wingnuts who suck Bush’s little teenieweenie.
August 24th, 2007 at 6:58 pmAt least Barney Frank hit on people his own age.
Apples & oranges..
August 24th, 2007 at 6:59 pmyeah, usual troll response, change the subject, straw man, lies on lies. I’ll be glad, and the country will be better off, when we’ve buried the GOP and jailed its treasonous, antiAmerican leadership, although they’re moving into the jails rather quickly.
August 24th, 2007 at 7:02 pmA Caesar salad jock strap
Comment by Mr. Malarkios — August 24, 2007 @ 6:55 pm
Doesn’t take much to hold an anchovy back
August 24th, 2007 at 7:02 pmDoesn’t take much to hold an anchovy back
Comment by dbadass — August 24, 2007 @ 7:02 pm
Just a pair of croutons. He’s hoping for a date with Barney Frank.
August 24th, 2007 at 7:05 pmThis is pretty bad of congress to hold this up. I mean cmon protecting a child predator??? I would think this would be a no brainer.
August 24th, 2007 at 7:06 pmAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAA, libs/progs! This Foley case which you spent so much time on blowing out of proportion for cheap and soulless political gain last year has now blown up in your dumb-looking mugs! No charges means that ALL of you Nazis who convicted Foley as a child molester/predator owe Foley a huge apology for slandering and libeling this poor man. According to libtarded ideology, Foley is no predator because he really suffers from alcoholism (remember how he checked into rehab around Nov or Oct of last year?). Therefore, libtards should coddle him and give him a pass like they do every time that professional screwup Pat Kennedy of RI gets drunk and beats up stewardesses or crashes his car! This Foley case illustrates one, UNDENIABLE FACT: the ONLY child predator EVER to have served in the House was homosexual Demoncrat Gerry Studds who, in the 80s, was exposed for lewdly screwing a 17-year-old page (but depraved Dems still backed him).
August 24th, 2007 at 7:08 pmRepublicans love to protect child molesters.Who else is gonna provide the entertainment for the closed door sessions?
August 24th, 2007 at 7:10 pmThey are just giving Foley a chance to turn over a new Page,,,,,err leaf.
Besides, he is already on one of the K Street Lobbyist payrolls, lining up nubile young men for the Repug congress.
August 24th, 2007 at 7:10 pmWhy do trolls defend the Republican Congressional leadership for covering up Foley’s predatory pedophilic behavior? Is this their idea of family values?
August 24th, 2007 at 7:13 pmOh, liberals. What a bummer.
Now get back to accusing Camp Pendleton Marines of murder. Senile Murtha is right there in the slander machine beside you.
Blame Bush for another losing day, lefties.
August 24th, 2007 at 7:16 pmWhy do trolls defend the Republican Congressional leadership for covering up Foley’s predatory pedophilic behavior? Is this their idea of family values?
Comment by VerbalKint — August 24, 2007 @ 7:13 pm
They may be sick family values but they are the only ones they have, (other than hate and killing and lying).
August 24th, 2007 at 7:17 pmComment by Rapture — August 24, 2007 @ 7:10 pm
I think the crime being investigated here was solicitation and the like. Where’s your evidence directly of molestation?
August 24th, 2007 at 7:18 pmBlame Bush for another losing day, lefties.
Comment by Blame Bush — August 24, 2007 @ 7:16 pm
Care to answer my question about why trolls defend the Republican Congressional leadership for covering up Foley’s predatory pedophilic behavior?
I didn’t think so.
August 24th, 2007 at 7:18 pmI think the crime being investigated here was solicitation and the like. Where’s your evidence directly of molestation?
Comment by Blame Bush — August 24, 2007 @ 7:18 pm
I see. We are going to play semantic games today. Let me spell it out for you: Mark Foley was a sexual predator and pedophile. The House GOP leadership knew it, and covered it up. End of story.
August 24th, 2007 at 7:20 pmComment by upside00 — August 24, 2007 @ 7:17 pm
And using an allegedly criminal incident (lewd e-mails, etc.) to win a U.S. election. The best demos can come up with? Using the name of a potential pervert (separate judicial issue, especially since he quickly resigned) to secure jobs representing the people. That’s witty.
August 24th, 2007 at 7:22 pmAnother pervert protected by the morally bankrupt Republican Party.
August 24th, 2007 at 7:24 pmBlame Bush:
August 24th, 2007 at 7:24 pmAny attempt to defend Foley is a fool’s errand and playing the “others including Dems have done it” card is equally ridiculous. I personally see little difference between the two parties of affluent white men but can’t we all agree that this behavior is reprehensible?
Comment by GerryStuddswillhauntDemsforevermore — August 24, 2007 @ 7:08 pm
Ohhhh , now I understand ; it’s ALCOHOLISM that creates/causes pedophilia , and Foley is sure to be ‘cured’ any moment now just like Ted Haggard was of homosexuality and drug use…….
August 24th, 2007 at 7:25 pmThanks , Dr Ruth ………….
I think the crime being investigated here was solicitation and the like. Where’s your evidence directly of molestation?
Comment by Blame Bush — August 24, 2007 @ 7:18 pm
If he didn’t do anything wrong, why won’t he surrender his congressional computer? What is he afraid of?
Hey, maybe he’s had some contact with terrorist simpathizers, they should check his computer and send him to Gitmo (just in case, better safe than sorry). A few waterboardings and he will be providing all the evidence needed.
You should be OK with this, right Mr. Blame Bush? Or are you a terrorist-loving, child-molesting pinko commie islamofascist?
August 24th, 2007 at 7:25 pmI hear Foley is starting up a Republican Youth camp where young Republican boys can receive a proper conservative indoctrination. I expect every frothing-mouthed Republican psychopath on these boards to send their young male children, as they apparently think Mark Foley is a great conservative role model.
August 24th, 2007 at 7:27 pmHey, Bob,
I love you!
August 24th, 2007 at 7:27 pmMost states have laws that cover indecent internet chats with minors as well. Physically raping a minor isn’t the only crime.
August 24th, 2007 at 7:28 pmComment by upside00 — August 24, 2007 @ 7:17 pm
And using an allegedly criminal incident (lewd e-mails, etc.) to win a U.S. election. The best demos can come up with? Using the name of a potential pervert (separate judicial issue, especially since he quickly resigned) to secure jobs representing the people. That’s witty.
Comment by Blame Bush — August 24, 2007 @ 7:22 pm
Would any horseshit GOP politician RESIGN if the accusation(s) didn’t have some basis in fact ?
August 24th, 2007 at 7:28 pmIt isn’t as if the page was involved in a sting operation , orchestrated by the DNC , jerkoff…….
BTW The horseshit GOP lost the November election because of Iraq ; and well , because they’re horseshit.
Something you can readily relate to………
i love u 2 MA
August 24th, 2007 at 7:29 pmListen up BB: Try to grab my crotch again, and I’ll kick yer’ freekin’ A.
August 24th, 2007 at 7:30 pmHis accusation that Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) knew that Gobie had operated a prostitution service out of Frank’s Capitol Hill apartment became national news after it was first reported Friday by the Washington Times
Dems love hypocrites.
Comment by Bob — August 24, 2007 @ 6:49 pm
And the horseshit GOP and their imbecilic backers like yourself , love to lie and use the most incredibly useless “sources” as “evidence/fact”……
August 24th, 2007 at 7:30 pmThe Washington Times ???????????
I hear , with a bit of work , they will reach the level of the National Enquirer in a year or 20.
can’t we all agree that this behavior is reprehensible?
Comment by dbadass — August 24, 2007 @ 7:24 pm
No, Blame Bush can’t agree that this behavior is reprehensible. He (I guarantee this creep is male, more or less) obviously thinks that Mark Foley should still be holding office. He offers one lame pseudo-legal argument after another for why Foley is just a great, great guy.
Absolutely sick.
By the way, great job representing the GOP, Blame Bush. Attaboy.
August 24th, 2007 at 7:31 pmComment by VerbalKint — August 24, 2007 @ 7:18 pm
I’m not defending anybody. You lefties used this entire incident to secure well-paid public posts. Could I ever put ‘Mark Foley’ on my resume and do that?
He resigned quickly, so he didn’t need to be ousted by vote.
It’s odd how lefty media types shows their charm every time — that somebody is declared to be overwhelmingly guilty on gossip blogs, like the one your posting at, when there isn’t even a case for a preliminary hearing. That’s a defense of the judicial system.
When Mark Foley is caught on ‘To Catch a Predator’ or brought to trial with no democrats present, then I’ll point my finger at Republicans unconditionally.
August 24th, 2007 at 7:31 pmFoley is innocent. But you know who is really to blame… the VP.
I accuse Cheney!!!
August 24th, 2007 at 7:32 pmBTW The horseshit GOP lost the November election because of Iraq ; and well , because they’re horseshit.
Something you can readily relate to………
Comment by MCMetal — August 24, 2007 @ 7:28 pm
And they are about ready to lose another seat when Denny “Man-Boy Lover” Hastert slithers away to avoid more investigations into his role in Foley and a few other “irregularities” in Illinois.
August 24th, 2007 at 7:32 pmCan I sex you up?
August 24th, 2007 at 7:32 pmAfter all, Cheney’s daughter is a gay.
I accuse Cheney!
August 24th, 2007 at 7:33 pmI’m speechless.
August 24th, 2007 at 7:33 pmYou never answered my question, coward: why did the House GOP leadership cover it up? To hang onto a Congressional seat, that’s why. Is that the kind of politics you support?
August 24th, 2007 at 7:33 pmWhat is that stuff on your finger, BTW?
August 24th, 2007 at 7:33 pmYou never answered my question, coward: why did the House GOP leadership cover it up? To hang onto a Congressional seat, that’s why. Is that the kind of politics you support?
Comment by VerbalKint — August 24, 2007 @ 7:33 pm
——
It’s gotta be Cheney.
I accuse Cheney!
August 24th, 2007 at 7:34 pmOne of our trolls is having a conversation with itself again. I suppose the subject matter of this thread has it hot and bothered.
August 24th, 2007 at 7:34 pmWho else could it have been? Foley was charged with being a gay and Cheney’s daughter is a gay, therefore, it has to have been Cheney!!!
I accuse Cheney.
August 24th, 2007 at 7:36 pmcan’t we all agree that this behavior is reprehensible?
Comment by dbadass — August 24, 2007 @ 7:24 pm
No, Blame Bush can’t agree that this behavior is reprehensible. He (I guarantee this creep is male, more or less) obviously thinks that Mark Foley should still be holding office. He offers one lame pseudo-legal argument after another for why Foley is just a great, great guy.
Absolutely sick.
By the way, great job representing the GOP, Blame Bush. Attaboy.
Comment by VerbalKint — August 24, 2007 @ 7:31 pm
Actually , those like “Blame Bush” are even more despicable in their moronic use of pseudo-legal argument(s).
August 24th, 2007 at 7:37 pmFoley himself , with his resignation , is an acknowledgement of his purported guilt.
The contemptible part of his actions , is WHO HE WAS : chairman of the House Caucus on Missing and Exploited Children …….
And these GOP/Chimpy leg humpers are babbling about hypocrites ?
Comment by Marcus Aurelius — August 24, 2007 @ 7:33 pm
I get the feeling this one was the 17-year-old Gerry Studds had as his bed-mate back in the day.
How were the 80’s for you?
August 24th, 2007 at 7:38 pmPotential criminals Foley and Jefferson will both get off scot-free due to this bizarre Legislative Privilege claim.
I hate that our employees can refuse to share records of their work with us. (That goes for Executive Privilege as well, BTW).
August 24th, 2007 at 7:40 pmComment by Marcus Aurelius — August 24, 2007 @ 7:33 pm
I get the feeling this one was the 17-year-old Gerry Studds had as his bed-mate back in the day.
How were the 80’s for you?
Comment by Blame Bush — August 24, 2007 @ 7:38 pm
Personally , they were wonderful for me…….
August 24th, 2007 at 7:40 pmAs an American , they were terrible , because that was the time of Ronnie Retard and the elder Shrub ; 2 piles of crap ……..
I hate that our employees can refuse to share records of their work with us. (That goes for Executive Privilege as well, BTW).
Comment by Egreggious — August 24, 2007 @ 7:40 pm
—
I accuse Cheney.
August 24th, 2007 at 7:40 pmComment by VerbalKint — August 24, 2007 @ 7:33 pm
Perhaps the involved Republicans and their staff did screw up. Aren’t most of them resigned by now? Isn’t Denny Hastert leaving?
Gerry Studds, however, stuck around and continued to collect his taxpayer funded salary. That’s why Massachusetts has the dumbest voters on the block.
August 24th, 2007 at 7:41 pmLest we forget just some of the e-mail exchanges the Republican hero Mark Foley had with 16 year old pages that were unrefuted by the Congressman:
FOLEY: me 2 cast got you going what you wearing
PAGE: normal clothes tshirt and shorts
FOLEY: um so a big buldge
PAGE: ya
FOLEY: um love to slip them off of you
PAGE: haha
FOLEY: and gram the one eyed snake grab
PAGE: not tonight . . . dont get to excited
FOLEY: well your hard
PAGE: that is true
FOLEY: and a little horny
PAGE: and also tru
FOLEY: get a ruler and measure it for me
PAGE: ive already told you that
FOLEY: tell me again
PAGE: 7 and 1/2
FOLEY: ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmm beautiful
August 24th, 2007 at 7:41 pmPotential criminals Foley and Jefferson will both get off scot-free due to this bizarre Legislative Privilege claim.
I hate that our employees can refuse to share records of their work with us. (That goes for Executive Privilege as well, BTW).
Comment by Egreggious — August 24, 2007 @ 7:40 pm
Screw that ; they should both be doing time .
August 24th, 2007 at 7:41 pmI don’t give a damn about the stupid letter designation you have by your name as a politician ; guilty is guilty………..
He resigned quickly, so he didn’t need to be ousted by vote.
The republican leadership knew about Foley for years and they protected him. He resigned quickly only when it was revealed to the general public.
August 24th, 2007 at 7:42 pmMark Foley was the congressional head of protecting children from internet predators. Mark Foley was preying on young pages on the internet. Pages were warned of Foley for at least ten years. Top Republicans covered it up. All of this is perfectly all right with the Right? It is only wrong if we mention it? Your rules are perverted, too.
August 24th, 2007 at 7:42 pmI’ve been waiting for a long time to see the sun shine; to take a stroll on the beach and to see the beauty of your fat ass hanging out of that speedo. I’ve been waiting to feel your clammy touch; waiting for our passion to blossom; waiting for my arousal to begin; waiting for an orgy of neocon man sex that would never end. Now I have all of these Republican things and so much more–my desire came true, the day I met you.
Love,
Marcus
August 24th, 2007 at 7:43 pmComment by UpFromTheSkies — August 24, 2007 @ 7:41 pm
I accuse Cheney. He turned his daughter into a gay, so it has to be his fault.
I accuse Cheney.
August 24th, 2007 at 7:43 pmComment by VerbalKint — August 24, 2007 @ 7:33 pm
Perhaps the involved Republicans and their staff did screw up. Aren’t most of them resigned by now? Isn’t Denny Hastert leaving?
Gerry Studds, however, stuck around and continued to collect his taxpayer funded salary. That’s why Massachusetts has the dumbest voters on the block.
Comment by Blame Bush — August 24, 2007 @ 7:41 pm
Yeah , as opposed to Kansas , that wants to teach a fairy tale known as “Creationism” as scientific fact ……….
August 24th, 2007 at 7:44 pmCreationism is about as factual as Chimpy’s military record.
Gerry Studds, however, stuck around and continued to collect his taxpayer funded salary. That’s why Massachusetts has the dumbest voters on the block.
Comment by Blame Bush — August 24, 2007 @ 7:41 pm
So you’re mad because Foley wasn’t afforded the same opportunity?
August 24th, 2007 at 7:44 pmComment by UpFromTheSkies — August 24, 2007 @ 7:41 pm
Gross.
August 24th, 2007 at 7:44 pmComment by Marcus Aurelius — August 24, 2007 @ 7:43 pm
Yep. Gerry Studds got to him.
August 24th, 2007 at 7:44 pmMassachusetts has the dumbest voters on the block.
Comment by Blame Bush — August 24, 2007 @ 7:41 pm
I believe they usually come in #1 in the country in education.
August 24th, 2007 at 7:45 pmAll these gays ruined our government. Do you know who’s daughter is a gay? That’s right, our VP.
I accuse Cheney.
August 24th, 2007 at 7:46 pmI’ll be the stud, if you’ll be the queen. In fact, I wouldn’t have it any other way. (I am a Roman, after all. And you do have feminine affectations.)
August 24th, 2007 at 7:47 pmComment by MCMetal — August 24, 2007 @ 7:44 pm
“Creationism” has not a thing to do with allegedly preying on a male page or having a relationship with a 17-year-old. Do you have Tourettes?
August 24th, 2007 at 7:48 pmHey everybody,
Accuse Cheney is our own Mr Pee!!!
Did you like the caesar salad joke?
August 24th, 2007 at 7:50 pmI thought Foleygate was why Hastert was resigning early.
August 24th, 2007 at 7:51 pmMaybe Barney Frank can help his fellow homo out.
Comment by Bob — August 24, 2007 @ 6:44 pm
August 24th, 2007 at 7:51 pm————-
HEyOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO o OOOOOOOOOOOOOO o !!!! Bob
Keep up the great work at the C I A !!! !!! !!! !!!
What…FU(K!…do you…PI$$..mean…DI(KHEAD!?
August 24th, 2007 at 7:52 pmDid you like the caesar salad joke?
Comment by Keith — August 24, 2007 @ 7:50 pm
—–
What caesar salad joke?
I’m a leftonian, I don’t read the comments, I just come on and accuse Cheney.
I accuse Cheney.
August 24th, 2007 at 7:53 pmSo Blame Bush does acknowledge that Foley was “preying” on children. But his Gerry Studds line of reasoning seems to indicate that he thinks two wrongs make a right, an attitude apparently shared by nearly all Bush supporters.
Never mind that the Gerry Studds situation occured over two decades ago.
Blame Clinton.
August 24th, 2007 at 7:53 pmComment by Keith — August 24, 2007 @ 7:45 pm
A little bit too educated, I suppose, keeping admitted predators in political office.
Though Mass. doesn’t exactly fall far behind, Vermont is ranked the smartest state. http://www.morganquitno.com/edpress.htm
August 24th, 2007 at 7:53 pmWhat…FU(K!…do you…PI$$..mean…DI(KHEAD!?
Comment by Marcus Aurelius — August 24, 2007 @ 7:52 pm
————-
You said “DI(K”HEAD, so I assume that you are accusing Cheney of something. Well anyway,
I accuse Cheney.
August 24th, 2007 at 7:54 pmSo, BB, how are thinga down in Alabama?
August 24th, 2007 at 7:55 pm“Creationism†has not a thing to do with allegedly preying on a male page or having a relationship with a 17-year-old. Do you have Tourettes?
Comment by Blame Bush — August 24, 2007 @ 7:48 pm
According to you, neither does Mark Foley. So one is not more irrelevant than the other.
August 24th, 2007 at 7:55 pmOur side got away with it again!
Suck it, Libs!
August 24th, 2007 at 7:56 pmSince Cheney is running the administration, whenever the administration does something wrong it would be normal to accuse Cheney. You blame Bill or Hillary for everything that goes wrong in 2007.
August 24th, 2007 at 7:56 pmComment by VerbalKint — August 24, 2007 @ 7:53 pm
An attempted lefty whitewash. It doesn’t matter if it happened in 1845, it’s still relevant and inexcusable, the perfect example of lefty hypocrisy.
You democrats started caring to protect children from sex-crimes…when? Only when your Representatives need to have a “party” in pointing out big, bad Republicans and lining your pockets with six-figure salaries?
August 24th, 2007 at 7:57 pmSo one is not more irrelevant than the other.
Comment by Egreggious — August 24, 2007 @ 7:55 pm
——–
Sure one isn’t. No one suggested that Creationism had anything to do with not not prey on on a male page.
But anyway,
I accuse Cheney.
August 24th, 2007 at 7:57 pmComment by MCMetal — August 24, 2007 @ 7:44 pm
“Creationism†has not a thing to do with allegedly preying on a male page or having a relationship with a 17-year-old. Do you have Tourettes?
Comment by Blame Bush — August 24, 2007 @ 7:48 pm
When you believe in a fairy tale , how valid is your opinion on anything even remotely connected to reality/everyday life ?
August 24th, 2007 at 7:58 pmBTW
I didn’t claim that the belief in the garbage known as “Creationism” is related to either Foley or Studds .
It was a reminder of how those like yourself that are so stupid , shouldn’t try to comment on the intelligence of others , when you possess little to none……….
Oops…
———————————————————-
So one is not more irrelevant than the other.
Comment by Egreggious — August 24, 2007 @ 7:55 pm
——–
Sure one isn’t. No one suggested that Creationism had anything to do with not not preying on a male page.
But anyway,
I accuse Cheney.
Comment by Accuse Cheney — August 24, 2007 @ 7:57 pm
August 24th, 2007 at 7:58 pmComment by Accuse Cheney — August 24, 2007 @ 7:53 pm
Hii, Cheney. I forgot to tell you that as a concerned, irresponsible lefty, I blame you.
Why did you have to invent frizzy hair, Cheney?
August 24th, 2007 at 7:59 pmThough Mass. doesn’t exactly fall far behind, Vermont is ranked the smartest state. http://www.morganquitno.com/edpress.htm
Comment by Blame Bush — August 24, 2007 @ 7:53 pm
And it’s easy to notice that you are most definitely not a resident of Vermont………..
August 24th, 2007 at 7:59 pmComment by MCMetal — August 24, 2007 @ 7:58 pm
The intelligence gage — a phony, brainfried lefty named MCMETAL!!
MCMETAL!!!!
MCMETAL!!!!
How would you like to be taken seriously, again??
August 24th, 2007 at 8:01 pmWhy did you have to invent frizzy hair, Cheney?
Comment by Blame Bush — August 24, 2007 @ 7:59 pm
——–
Because Cheney is incredibly evil, that’s why!
Anyway, I blame Bush as well, but above all
I accuse Cheney!
August 24th, 2007 at 8:02 pmComment by VerbalKint — August 24, 2007 @ 7:53 pm
An attempted lefty whitewash. It doesn’t matter if it happened in 1845, it’s still relevant and inexcusable, the perfect example of lefty hypocrisy.
You democrats started caring to protect children from sex-crimes…when? Only when your Representatives need to have a “party†in pointing out big, bad Republicans and lining your pockets with six-figure salaries?
Comment by Blame Bush — August 24, 2007 @ 7:57 pm
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
August 24th, 2007 at 8:02 pm@ You claiming that those in the horseshit GOP are “big and bad” .
Maybe to you …………Not to anyone that’s above the age of 5 , though.
Hii, Cheney. I forgot to tell you that as a concerned, irresponsible lefty, I blame you.
Why did you have to invent frizzy hair, Cheney?
Comment by Blame Bush — August 24, 2007 @ 7:59 pm
You believe Cheney invented frizzy hair, psycho?
August 24th, 2007 at 8:02 pmIn your link—-notice how all the smart states vote Democratic?
August 24th, 2007 at 8:03 pmComment by MCMetal — August 24, 2007 @ 7:58 pm
The intelligence gage — a phony, brainfried lefty named MCMETAL!!
MCMETAL!!!!
MCMETAL!!!!
How would you like to be taken seriously, again??
Comment by Blame Bush — August 24, 2007 @ 8:01 pm
By the fact that I can correctly spell the word “gauge” , asswipe……..
August 24th, 2007 at 8:04 pmBWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
BTW
I’d love to read your rationale for how you can lyingly claim that I am “phony” and “brain fried”(which are 2 words , Copernicus)
okay, BB – where are you hiding the gerbil?
August 24th, 2007 at 8:05 pmYou democrats started caring to protect children from sex-crimes…when? Only when your Representatives need to have a “party†in pointing out big, bad Republicans and lining your pockets with six-figure salaries?
Comment by Blame Bush — August 24, 2007 @ 7:57 pm
Another incoherent post.
August 24th, 2007 at 8:05 pmThere’s a real problem with the gays in America.
I accuse Cheney!
August 24th, 2007 at 8:06 pmMCMETAL!!!!
A resident of Nevada, I see. In addition to low educational achievement, Nevada also ranks as the most dangerous state.
I assume that a good chunk of anarchist lefties and illegal immigrants live there.
Should Harry Reid be our leader in the Senate when his state isn’t even representative of the best of America?
August 24th, 2007 at 8:08 pmIt doesn’t matter if it happened in 1845, it’s still relevant and inexcusable, the perfect example of lefty hypocrisy.
Comment by Blame Bush — August 24, 2007 @ 7:57 pm
Well, actually it does matter. It isn’t the same party, and it isn’t the same voters. It is YOUR party TODAY that is protecting pedophiles. That is what really matters. You don’t hear any cries for Democrats to resign over things that happened in 1845, do you?
This is precisely why your precious GOP will be destroyed at the polls in 2008.
So long, loser.
August 24th, 2007 at 8:11 pmComment by Nat — August 24, 2007 @ 8:05 pm
In other words, ‘Nat’ didn’t take the words too well and can’t even provide a spin response.
Provide some more irrelevant grammar lessons, lefty, please.
August 24th, 2007 at 8:11 pmThere’s a real problem with the gays in America.
I accuse Cheney!
Comment by Accuse Cheney — August 24, 2007 @ 8:06 pm
What is the problem? Precisely?
August 24th, 2007 at 8:11 pmWell, hmmmm…should Bush be President (Texas. HaaHa! Texas!)? Should Cheney be VP (Wyoming!)?
Even if they were both from ultra-liberal Vermont, the answer would still be no.
August 24th, 2007 at 8:13 pmComment by VerbalKint — August 24, 2007 @ 8:11 pm
Not too fast. It’s only because you lefties have the media types in the palm of your hand. There’s a mound of democrat corruption to be unveiled, I’m sure.
How many years have you been hyping “so long?” Since 2000?
Truth has a liberal bias — truth to a liberal’s ears, because it’s all they’re willing to hear.
August 24th, 2007 at 8:14 pmMr. Pee, you blamed Hillary for destroying the Minneapolis bridge !!!!!!
How intelligent/sane is that???
August 24th, 2007 at 8:14 pmThat’s right, progressives have the largest corporations in the palms of our hands[SARCASM].
August 24th, 2007 at 8:16 pmComment by Marcus Aurelius — August 24, 2007 @ 8:13 pm
Well, Harry’s not in “ultra-liberal” Vermont, because Harry is too stupid to live in Vermont. He’s not on-par with a high-caliber state.
And the last time I checked, neither Texas nor Wyoming was low ranked in the safety/education lists.
August 24th, 2007 at 8:17 pmWe also know what you’ve got in the palm of your hand.
August 24th, 2007 at 8:18 pmComment by Keith — August 24, 2007 @ 8:14 pm
I like your use of multiple exclamation points. :)
August 24th, 2007 at 8:18 pmWhat is the problem? Precisely?
Comment by Zooey — August 24, 2007 @ 8:11 pm
Some have very poor fashion sense.
August 24th, 2007 at 8:20 pmMCMETAL!!!!
A resident of Nevada, I see. In addition to low educational achievement, Nevada also ranks as the most dangerous state.
I assume that a good chunk of anarchist lefties and illegal immigrants live there.
Should Harry Reid be our leader in the Senate when his state isn’t even representative of the best of America?
Comment by Blame Bush — August 24, 2007 @ 8:08 pm
I’m not a Nevada resident , chump ; and although I would agree Harry Reid is not the 1st person I would have leading the Senate , a more blatant example of an undeserving person being in a position of power resides in the Oval Office and in your name………
August 24th, 2007 at 8:20 pmIn other words, ‘Nat’ didn’t take the words too well and can’t even provide a spin response.
Provide some more irrelevant grammar lessons, lefty, please.
Comment by Blame Bush — August 24, 2007 @ 8:11 pm
I just want you to be coherent. Your representation of conservatism is pathetic.
August 24th, 2007 at 8:20 pmOkay:
Conjunctions join words, phrases or clauses. Coordinating conjunctions: and, but, for, or, nor, either, neither, yet, so, so that. (Yet & so are also used as adverbs.) Subordinating conjunctions join two clauses (main and dependent/subordinate): although, because, since, until, while, etc.
August 24th, 2007 at 8:23 pmNot too fast. It’s only because you lefties have the media types in the palm of your hand. There’s a mound of democrat corruption to be unveiled, I’m sure.
Comment by Blame Bush — August 24, 2007 @ 8:14 pm
If that was the case, the right wing noise machine would have revealed them already.
August 24th, 2007 at 8:24 pmSome have very poor fashion sense.
Egreggious — August 24, 2007 @ 8:20 pm
That’s just tragic. But the root of all the problems in this country? Who knew the gays were so damn powerful?
August 24th, 2007 at 8:29 pmMr. P claimed that that the Russians were muslims, and that the Saudis weren’t. So… not much in the brains department, right?
Heyoooooooooo….
August 24th, 2007 at 8:29 pmYou can’t hold one person responsible for their entire state.
Take Zooey, for instance.
August 24th, 2007 at 8:32 pmComment by VerbalKint — August 24, 2007 @ 8:11 pm
Not too fast. It’s only because you lefties have the media types in the palm of your hand. There’s a mound of democrat corruption to be unveiled, I’m sure.
How many years have you been hyping “so long?†Since 2000?
Truth has a liberal bias — truth to a liberal’s ears, because it’s all they’re willing to hear.
Comment by Blame Bush — August 24, 2007 @ 8:14 pm
The difference is …………I would just as readily jail a Dem as a Republican ; you wouldn’t , and that is why your talk of hypocrisy , anti-Americanism and traitorous behavior by those opposed to Chimpy is ludicrous and flat out bullshit………
August 24th, 2007 at 8:33 pmWho knew that I had the media in the palm of my hand?
August 24th, 2007 at 8:33 pmMr. Pee, you blamed Hillary for destroying the Minneapolis bridge !!!!!!
How intelligent/sane is that???
Comment by Keith — August 24, 2007 @ 8:14 pm
———-
That was Ralph, you liberal.
August 24th, 2007 at 8:36 pmYou can’t hold one person responsible for their entire state.
Take Zooey, for instance.
Comment by Keith — August 24, 2007 @ 8:32 pm
Thanks for that. :}
August 24th, 2007 at 8:37 pmThanks for that. :}
Comment by Zooey
I was trying to defend you.
August 24th, 2007 at 8:38 pmYou can’t hold one person responsible for their entire state.
Take Zooey, for instance.
Comment by Keith — August 24, 2007 @ 8:32 pm
Thanks for that. :}
Comment by Zooey — August 24, 2007 @ 8:37 pm
But if you’re the GOP , you can try to hold one man responsible for all the evils in the world in Clinton …………
August 24th, 2007 at 8:38 pmMr. Pee, it was your link that said Hillary’s front group destroyed the bridge and it sounded PRECISELY like you.
August 24th, 2007 at 8:40 pmMr. Pee, it was your link that said Hillary’s front group destroyed the bridge and it sounded PRECISELY like you.
Comment by Keith — August 24, 2007 @ 8:40 pm
–
What’s your point? That’s not my site.
August 24th, 2007 at 8:41 pmRalph destroyed the bridge? Did anyone notify the authorities?
August 24th, 2007 at 8:41 pmThe point is you are this minute saying liberals falsely blame Bush and Cheney for everything—that’s the point.
August 24th, 2007 at 8:42 pm“This is pretty bad of congress to hold this up. I mean cmon protecting a child predator??? I would think this would be a no brainer.
Comment by Krazny”
I actually think the reason why they refused to release Foley’s computer is the same reason they protested the FBI raiding Jefferson’s office. And they may have a point. It’s kind of a slippery slope when you start allowing people access to the computers of our legislators. I know that Foley and Jefferson are both creeps but sometimes we need to let creeps get away with what they did in order to set a precedent.
August 24th, 2007 at 8:42 pmWhat’s your point? That’s not my site.
Comment by Makarios — August 24, 2007 @ 8:41 pm
But it’s just your style, isn’t it?
August 24th, 2007 at 8:44 pmComment by Zooey — August 24, 2007 @ 8:44 pm
Nope.
August 24th, 2007 at 8:45 pmThis was Mr. P’s link:
http://www.americaphile.blogspot.com/
Today it is comparing Filner (D-CA) to Charles Manson.
August 24th, 2007 at 8:46 pmAnd the link says Edwards had better watch out or the Clintons will have him killed just like Vince Foster.
August 24th, 2007 at 8:48 pmRalph destroyed the bridge? Did anyone notify the authorities?
Comment by Marcus Aurelius — August 24, 2007 @ 8:41 pm
I knew Ralph was crazy, but I had no idea he blew up bridges.
August 24th, 2007 at 8:49 pmUsing Studds as a straw man doesn’t pan out. Here’s the situation:
“Studds was a central figure in the 1983 Congressional page sex scandal, when he and Representative Dan Crane were censured by the House of Representatives for separate sexual relationships with minors — in Studds’ case, a 1973 sexual relationship with a 17-year-old male congressional page who was of the age of legal consent. The relationship was consensual (which made it legal, in accordance with state law) but presented ethical concerns relating to working relationships with subordinates.”
How is this different from Foley? Well, there was only one page and it was consensual. With Foley there were numerous pages and many found his advances objectionable. What Studds did was wrong and he was censured for it. What Foley did was also wrong and he doesn’t seem to be being held accountable.
August 24th, 2007 at 8:50 pmNope.
Comment by Makarios — August 24, 2007 @ 8:45 pm
All caps, lots of exclamation points. Come on…..
August 24th, 2007 at 8:52 pm#
This was Mr. P’s link:
http://www.americaphile.blogspot.com/
Today it is comparing Filner (D-CA) to Charles Manson.
Comment by Keith — August 24, 2007 @ 8:46 pm
He was quite the suck-up on that blog as well, posting as Mr Konservo.
August 24th, 2007 at 8:54 pm“Gerry Studds, however, stuck around and continued to collect his taxpayer funded salary. That’s why Massachusetts has the dumbest voters on the block.
Comment by Blame Bush”
Massachusetts voters are dumb because they forgave Studds for having a consensual relationship with someone who was of legal age. Perhaps they don’t care if a gay man has a relationship with a younger gay man.
On the other hand, Foley made sexual advances to underage pages without considering their sexuality and made a lot of them very uncomfortable and feeling threatened. I fail to see how the two situations are the same and I fail to see how the Massachusetts voters are dumb. They liked what he did for them as their congressman and the voted him back into office numerous times.
August 24th, 2007 at 8:55 pmThis is off topic, but interesting. Three men dead in house in Orlando, Fla. Double murder, suicide. One was campaign manager for Republican congressman Tom Feeney. Feeney asked computer programmer Clint Curtis to make the software flipping the votes before the 2000 election. Curtis has testified under oath.
One headline said lovers’ quarrel.
August 24th, 2007 at 8:55 pmOne headline said lovers’ quarrel.
Comment by Keith — August 24, 2007 @ 8:55 pm
*snort*
Of course!
August 24th, 2007 at 8:58 pmKeith,
Thanks for the info. Do you have a link, perhaps?
I guess I could look up an Orlando paper, but thought if you had it handy it would be easier for me and other TP readers.
Thanks again.
August 24th, 2007 at 9:20 pmTrueblue,
Go to bradblog(dot)com
He has all the updates plus the history of Feeney and Curtis—-and the death of the person investigating Feeney.
August 24th, 2007 at 9:25 pmTry this
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=4995
August 24th, 2007 at 9:26 pmFor some perverse reason, I just decided to visit Pee’s blog. I think he’s been having problems. One now has to register to comment there. Was someone here giving him a hard time?
August 24th, 2007 at 9:27 pmWas someone here giving him a hard time?
Comment by Egreggious — August 24, 2007 @ 9:27 pm
—
I had a libtard infestation, it’s still being fumigated!
August 24th, 2007 at 9:29 pmComment by Egreggious — August 24, 2007 @ 9:27 pm
Really? What’s happening? I’ll check.
August 24th, 2007 at 9:29 pmI had a libtard infestation, it’s still being fumigated!
Comment by Makarios — August 24, 2007 @ 9:29 pm
I know it’s too late to tell you this, but you shouldn’t stay in the room while you’re fumigating.
August 24th, 2007 at 9:31 pmI know it’s too late to tell you this, but you shouldn’t stay in the room while you’re fumigating.
Comment by Egreggious — August 24, 2007 @ 9:31 pm
———
Why not?
It makes me feel like a big man, deleting their comments!!!
August 24th, 2007 at 9:34 pmI had a libtard infestation, it’s still being fumigated!
Comment by Makarios — August 24, 2007 @ 9:29 pm
I don’t see anything objectionable.
August 24th, 2007 at 9:34 pmComment by Egreggious — August 24, 2007 @ 9:27 pm
It MUST have been a perverse reason! I’m afraid to ask: what’s it like?
August 24th, 2007 at 9:34 pmIt makes me feel like a big man, deleting their comments!!!
Comment by Makarios — August 24, 2007 @ 9:34 pm
Now you know how Faiz feels.
And I imagine you won’t be criticizing his deletions anymore.
August 24th, 2007 at 9:35 pmWhy not?
It makes me feel like a big man, deleting their comments!!!
Comment by Makarios —
I guess that’s the only way you’d get that feeling.
August 24th, 2007 at 9:35 pmI forget, exactly how old were these “boys”? I thought they were in their late teens, and actually 18 or older by the time he ever met with them in person.
Libs just can’t seem to handle this issue properly. As much as they want to scream pedophile or queer, the facts / politics of the situation just won’t let them, so they have to use code words like “boys” to insinuate what they hope to imply. These individuals were young men, as Bill Maher correctly put it, so now you are left with gay bashing, so at least have the balls to say it out loud, since that is what you are intending to do.
August 24th, 2007 at 9:36 pmIt makes me feel like a big man, deleting their comments!!!
Comment by Makarios — August 24, 2007 @ 9:34 pm
You said a few days ago that you wanted everyone to be able to comment on your blog.
August 24th, 2007 at 9:36 pmIt MUST have been a perverse reason! I’m afraid to ask: what’s it like?
Comment by Jane E. Schneider — August 24, 2007 @ 9:34 pm
Believe it or not, Pee’s site borders on being sane. Except the comments. They’re just more of the same.
August 24th, 2007 at 9:36 pmThank you for the link, Keith.
:)
August 24th, 2007 at 9:37 pmYou said it was not your site. You said it was “Ralph’s” site.
August 24th, 2007 at 9:37 pmNow it’s your site?
Comment by Jason M. Hendler — August 24, 2007 @ 9:36 pm
Jason, you might want to check out some different sources.
August 24th, 2007 at 9:37 pmYou said a few days ago that you wanted everyone to be able to comment on your blog.
Comment by Zooey — August 24, 2007 @ 9:36 pm
—————————————
I still do.
August 24th, 2007 at 9:38 pmOhForChristsSake – -
Hendler is still here?
When is TP going to wise up and dump these turds?
August 24th, 2007 at 9:39 pm(a serious “Rove purge”, ya know?)
I still do.
Comment by Makarios — August 24, 2007 @ 9:38 pm
Just wants to make it real difficult to do so.
August 24th, 2007 at 9:40 pm#
I forget, exactly how old were these “boys� I thought they were in their late teens, and actually 18 or older by the time he ever met with them in person.
Comment by Jason M. Hendler — August 24, 2007 @ 9:36 pm
You “thought” wrong, apologist. They were underage when they were working as PAGES, which is where Foley met them and “mentored” them, and underage when he was sending provocative messages.
Typical “conservative” unable to acknowledge that a Republican actually did something wrong.
August 24th, 2007 at 9:40 pmJust wants to make it real difficult to do so.
Comment by Egreggious — August 24, 2007 @ 9:40 pm
—
It’s not really meant to be a “blog” or a chat room. I’m really just posting about stuff that I’m interested in.
August 24th, 2007 at 9:42 pmI still do.
Comment by Makarios — August 24, 2007 @ 9:38 pm
Judging from some of the comments there, it appears there have been deletions. What’s up with that?
August 24th, 2007 at 9:43 pmSo, PeeBrain says he wants people to comment on his page, but then gloats about deleting them all.
Ummm, can someone explain this?
August 24th, 2007 at 9:43 pm#
You said it was not your site. You said it was “Ralph’s†site.
Now it’s your site?
Comment by Keith — August 24, 2007 @ 9:37 pm
Different blog. Ralph’s blog is the one with the psycho posts about Hillary and some very weird conspiracy theories that Mr Pee was encouraging him with. Pee’s own blog is his feeble attempt at legitimacy, presenting a “history” of politics and Greek philosophers, written more cogently than Crazy Ralph — at the level of a seventh grader, at least.
August 24th, 2007 at 9:43 pmJudging from some of the comments there, it appears there have been deletions. What’s up with that?
Comment by Zooey — August 24, 2007 @ 9:43 pm
So, PeeBrain says he wants people to comment on his page, but then gloats about deleting them all.
Ummm, can someone explain this?
Comment by trueblue — August 24, 2007 @ 9:43 pm
—-
Come on, libs! Is your memory that bad???
August 24th, 2007 at 9:44 pm
It makes me feel like a big man, deleting their comments!!!
Comment by Makarios
Whatever does it for ya, big fella.
August 24th, 2007 at 9:45 pmMy bad. see what you mean now.
August 24th, 2007 at 9:46 pmComment by Makarios —
Comment by Makarios — August 24, 2007 @ 9:44 pm
And yet still so small…
August 24th, 2007 at 9:46 pmWhy not?
Guess you missed post #150:
It makes me feel like a big man, deleting their comments!!!
Comment by Makarios —
I guess that’s the only way you’d get that feeling.
Comment by trueblue — August 24, 2007 @ 9:35 pm
August 24th, 2007 at 9:46 pmComment by Makarios — August 24, 2007 @ 9:44 pm
You must be a very tiny man. I feel sorry for you. No wonder CT left.
August 24th, 2007 at 9:46 pmThese individuals were young men, as Bill Maher correctly put it, so now you are left with gay bashing, so at least have the balls to say it out loud, since that is what you are intending to do.
Comment by Jason M. Hendler — August 24, 2007 @ 9:36 pm
Quick question for you, Jason… who forced Foley to resign?
August 24th, 2007 at 9:48 pmGuess you missed post #150:
–
No, I saw it. It was funny.
August 24th, 2007 at 9:49 pmYou must be a very tiny man. I feel sorry for you. No wonder CT left.
Comment by Zooey — August 24, 2007 @ 9:46 pm
The Eck told me he was disappointed as well. He had such high expectations, what with the way Pee talks and all.
But I helped him forget all about that.
August 24th, 2007 at 9:50 pmHey, TRoS, how’re you doing? I’m going to go check out the Mets game now, I’ll be back in a bit.
August 24th, 2007 at 9:51 pmNo, I saw it. It was funny.
Comment by Makarios — August 24, 2007 @ 9:49 pm
And true, too!
August 24th, 2007 at 9:52 pmBut I helped him forget all about that.
Comment by Martha Stewart — August 24, 2007 @ 9:50 pm
You and The Eck are a very good thing. :)
August 24th, 2007 at 9:55 pmNo, I saw it. It was funny.
Comment by Makarios
No. Actually, I think it’s kind of sad that the only way you can feel powerful is to shut out anything that disturbs your narrow, trauma-based, rigid reality.
August 24th, 2007 at 9:56 pmJudging from some of the comments there, it appears there have been deletions. What’s up with that?
Comment by Zooey — August 24, 2007 @ 9:43 pm
I hope we’re cool on the confusion of earlier. Seems like there has been some issues here today. Best….
August 24th, 2007 at 9:57 pmNo. Actually, I think it’s kind of sad that the only way you can feel powerful is to shut out anything that disturbs your narrow, trauma-based, rigid reality.
Comment by trueblue — August 24, 2007 @ 9:56 pm
————–
Say what?
August 24th, 2007 at 9:57 pmActually, I think it’s kind of sad that the only way you can feel powerful is to shut out anything that disturbs your narrow, trauma-based, rigid reality.
Comment by trueblue — August 24, 2007 @ 9:56 pm
I was with you right up to the word “reality”.
August 24th, 2007 at 9:58 pmHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA, libs/progs! The Foley case which you spent so much time on blowing out of proportion for cheap and soulless political gain last year has now blown up in your dumb-looking mugs! No charges means that ALL of you Nazis who convicted Foley as a child molester/predator owe Foley a huge apology for slandering and libeling this poor man. According to libtarded ideology, Foley is no predator because he really suffers from alcoholism (remember how he checked into rehab around Nov or Oct of last year?). Therefore, libtards should coddle him and give him a pass like they do every time that professional screwup Pat Kennedy of RI gets drunk and beats up stewardesses or crashes his car! This Foley case illustrates one, UNDENIABLE FACT: the ONLY child predator EVER to have served in the House was homosexual Demoncrat Gerry Studds who, in the 80s, was exposed for lewdly screwing a 17-year-old page (but depraved Dems still backed him)
August 24th, 2007 at 9:58 pmSay what?
Comment by Makarios —
I was with you right up to the word “realityâ€.
Comment by Martha Stewart
Mak’s idea of reality. He had to create it because of his obvious childhood issues. Trauma-based.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:01 pmI hope we’re cool on the confusion of earlier. Seems like there has been some issues here today. Best….
Comment by dbadass — August 24, 2007 @ 9:57 pm
No problem, dbadass!
I was looking at Mr Pee’s blog because Eggy said there were problems there (and there are, wow), and that’s what I’m talking about.
On Pee’s blog, there’s a comment, I refresh, the comment is gone. Amazing!
He pulls the crap he does around here, and can’t take “off topic” comments on his own blog.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:02 pmHe pulls the crap he does around here, and can’t take “off topic†comments on his own blog.
Comment by Zooey — August 24, 2007 @ 10:02 pm
Kudos to whoever was responsible for yet another display of Pee’s bipolarism.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:04 pmHe pulls the crap he does around here, and can’t take “off topic†comments on his own blog.
Comment by Zooey — August 24, 2007 @ 10:02 pm
—————–
Oh Zooey, my poor, naive, simple, liberal. One day you’ll understand.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:05 pmThe emails cannot be had because they are “congressional workpapers?” Who in the congress believes this? It’s really about keeping the executive out of the capitol. It’s less about doing the moral and right thing and seeing that Mr. Foley gets prosecuted if at all possible. Has anybody checked to see who the offended pages are? Talked to them or their parents? Gotten statements? Because, this is a guy who assumed his power as a member of congress could get what he wanted from these pages. It’s arrogance and it has taken over the entire congress. Maybe the IG or some other appropriate agency ought to investigate everyone in congress to see what else is going on. A proactive investigation where whoever does the spying will do it in representation of the people, because we have no representation!!
August 24th, 2007 at 10:05 pmMakarios said:
Zooey,
I forced myself to go there, and I found these posts interesting…..
Not at all.
At the time I didn’t know about the settings, and at the time I didn’t need to use them.
Would you set out mouse-traps if you had no mice?
August 24, 2007 9:22 PM
and,
Makarios said…
You have free speech, and I have the freedom to delete! HA!!
August 24, 2007 9:27 PM
See? Can’t handle it. If it’s not within his narrow view, he can’t accept it.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:08 pmReally sad.
But it’s wrong because Foley had a superior position over them.
Wait while I try to rephrase that.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:09 pmSorry,
added my comment in the middle of Mak’s post.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:09 pmOops!
:(
Wait while I try to rephrase that.
Comment by Keith — August 24, 2007 @ 10:09 pm
Please do. I think you have it backwards.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:10 pmBut it’s wrong because Foley had a superior position over them.
Wait while I try to rephrase that.
Comment by Keith —
OK. That was funny.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:11 pm:D
Oh Zooey, my poor, naive, simple, liberal. One day you’ll understand.
Comment by Makarios — August 24, 2007 @ 10:05 pm
Explain now. I have a little time.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:11 pmI mean they could not offend Foley because it would be detrimental to their career. Some pages said they were warned about his behavior in 1997 (I believe). Top Republicans must have covered up for about ten years.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:12 pmReally sad.
Comment by trueblue — August 24, 2007 @ 10:08 pm
———-
First of all, there’s nothing to talk about on my site.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:13 pmSecondly, nothing that I deleted was a challenge to my “narrow world view.” Unless you are talking about the libtards who advocated f-cking sheep.
See? Can’t handle it. If it’s not within his narrow view, he can’t accept it.
Really sad.
Comment by trueblue — August 24, 2007 @ 10:08 pm
He’s a typical conservative.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:13 pmMr. Incident, sir?
A representative from your web server is here, sir.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:15 pmYes sir, Servitors-R-Us.
They would like to know why you have blocked nearly all upload feed from the net.
Yes, sir, I understand sir, so very confusing and disturbing, sir.
First of all, there’s nothing to talk about on my site.
Comment by Makarios — August 24, 2007 @ 10:13 pm
That’s a real self-endorsement for you.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:16 pmFirst of all, there’s nothing to talk about on my site.
Comment by Makarios
Then why do you link to it, and why do you have a comment section built into it?
August 24th, 2007 at 10:16 pmFirst of all, there’s nothing to talk about on my site.
Secondly, nothing that I deleted was a challenge to my “narrow world view.†Unless you are talking about the libtards who advocated f-cking sheep.
Comment by Makarios — August 24, 2007 @ 10:13 pm
Then why do you bother having comments at all?
Liberals do not advocate f*cking sheep. Those commenters must have been conservatives.
I’m waiting for you to enlighten me, Mr Pee.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:16 pmUnless you are talking about the libtards who advocated f-cking sheep.
Comment by Makarios — August 24, 2007
Is that an, er, tender subject?
August 24th, 2007 at 10:16 pmThen why do you bother having comments at all?
–
Who cares?
August 24th, 2007 at 10:17 pmPeePee,
Also, I never said narrow world view.
It’s your narrow sense of reality that has been incredibly warped by your problems.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:17 pmFirst of all, there’s nothing to talk about on my site.
Comment by Makarios
Thanks for the heads up!
August 24th, 2007 at 10:17 pmThey were IslamoFascist sheep. They had it coming to them.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:18 pmyour problems.
Comment by trueblue — August 24, 2007 @ 10:17 pm
–
What problems?
August 24th, 2007 at 10:19 pmWho cares?
Comment by Makarios
The public should care – - the public you are reaching out to. The founders of a democratic republic that you so revere would be ashamed that you are squashing any dissent or other points of view.
We should all care, because a free, democratic republic is what it’s all about.
(DUH!)
August 24th, 2007 at 10:21 pmComment by trueblue — August 24, 2007 @ 10:21 pm
Well, in that case, why do I have the option of not have comments at all?
August 24th, 2007 at 10:22 pmWho cares?
Comment by Makarios — August 24, 2007 @ 10:17 pm
Obviously you do, Mr Pee.
You cared enough to start a blog.
You cared enough to add a comments feature.
You cared enough to let anyone comment.
You cared enough to delete anything you weren’t comfortable with.
That’s you caring, Mr Pee.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:23 pmMr. pp finally gets a website of his very own, and no one shows.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:24 pmHe still has to come here to get some attention.
You cared enough to add a comments feature.
—
Nah. It came with a comments feature.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:25 pmWell, in that case, why do I have the option of not have comments at all?
Comment by Makarios
That made “zero” sense.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:25 pmMr. pp finally gets a website of his very own, and no one shows.
He still has to come here to get some attention.
Comment by Raven — August 24, 2007 @ 10:24 pm
We should start commenting on Mr Pee’s blog. If he’ll let us, that is.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:26 pmKnowing P, he writes all the comments (that show up) himself.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:26 pmMr. pp finally gets a website of his very own, and no one shows.
He still has to come here to get some attention.
Comment by Raven — August 24, 2007 @ 10:24 pm
————
Actually, if TP had been more hospitable, maybe I wouldn’t automatically kick people out of my site. I learned my TP that you should delete random comments and ban people for no reason!
August 24th, 2007 at 10:26 pmHere we go -
The TP Did It Too Defense!
What a child.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:27 pmComment by trueblue — August 24, 2007 @ 10:25 pm
It’s going to be okay, honey.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:27 pmActually, if TP had been more hospitable, maybe I wouldn’t automatically kick people out of my site. I learned my TP that you should delete random comments and ban people for no reason!
Comment by Makarios — August 24, 2007 @ 10:26 pm
Hey, I’m seeing lots and lots of comments by you, AND you’re still here.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:28 pmYou’ve still got a few weeks of warm weather left, Mr. P, why don’t you try selling lemonade on the corner?
August 24th, 2007 at 10:29 pmJust don’t say anything to your customers except for
“5 cents please” and “thank you”
Knowing P, he writes all the comments (that show up) himself.
Comment by Raven — August 24, 2007 @ 10:26 pm
OMG, that’s it!
Pee writes his own comments on his blog! It makes perfect sense!
August 24th, 2007 at 10:29 pmMak,
August 24th, 2007 at 10:30 pmJudging by your control issues and blaming others for your bad behaviors, I believe you were quite young when your trauma started.
You will need a number of years of therapy to release those demons, but it can be done.
trueblue,
The demons released HIM.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:31 pmtrauma
What trauma?
August 24th, 2007 at 10:31 pmHey, I’m seeing lots and lots of comments by you, AND you’re still here.
Comment by Zooey — August 24, 2007 @ 10:28 pm
I was really hoping he’d devote more time to his own blog, and give us a break.
How’s that ThinkConservatively blog idea going, Mak? You should really go whole hog and call it ThinkNotAtAll.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:31 pmHey, I’m seeing lots and lots of comments by you, AND you’re still here.
Comment by Zooey — August 24, 2007 @ 10:28 pm
If logic hasn’t worked in the past, why do you still try?
August 24th, 2007 at 10:33 pmThinkNotAtAll.
No posts.
No comments.
It would amount to the same thing really.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:33 pmI was really hoping he’d devote more time to his own blog, and give us a break.
How’s that ThinkConservatively blog idea going, Mak? You should really go whole hog and call it ThinkNotAtAll.
Comment by Egreggious — August 24, 2007 @ 10:31 pm
Pee’s blog is boring and self-serving.
I think he’d do well with something like “ThinkNotAtAll.”
August 24th, 2007 at 10:34 pmPee writes his own comments on his blog! It makes perfect sense!
Comment by Zooey
Who could imagine even the most bored conservative wasting any time there?
August 24th, 2007 at 10:35 pmI tell you a post makes no sense, and you refer to me as “hon”.
Zooey askes you to explain yourself and you reply that she is a “poor, naive, simple, liberal.”
Interesting that you never reply directly to a question asked by a strong, indepedent woman. Just insults.
I think I’m zeroing in on your disorder.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:35 pmIf logic hasn’t worked in the past, why do you still try?
Comment by dbadass — August 24, 2007 @ 10:33 pm
Habit. Masochism. Bored. :-D
August 24th, 2007 at 10:36 pmWho could imagine even the most bored conservative wasting any time there?
Comment by Raven — August 24, 2007 @ 10:35 pm
Bored conservatives look at boobies. He has statues of men. Sheesh.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:37 pmWho could imagine even the most bored conservative wasting any time there?
Comment by Raven — August 24, 2007 @ 10:35 pm
——
Willyloman is there right now.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:38 pmBeen reading through the comments. Sounds like our friend Mr P had some trouble on his blog tonight. Wow. Even I never evoked the subject of f*cking sheep on my blog, and I know I got some weird ideas. What did he say there that brought this on?
August 24th, 2007 at 10:40 pmWillyloman is there right now.
Comment by Makarios — August 24, 2007 @ 10:38 pm
Cool! Tell him to come back to TP.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:40 pmYou democrats started caring to protect children from sex-crimes…when? Only when your Representatives need to have a “party†in pointing out big, bad Republicans and lining your pockets with six-figure salaries?
Comment by Blame Bush — August 24, 2007 @ 7:57 pm
You are one sick f*ck CT.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:41 pmHabit. Masochism. Bored. :-D
Comment by Zooey — August 24, 2007 @ 10:36 pm
As you may or may not remember my interest is primarily in human behavior and that was my first focus as I entered here but some characters are just characterures of interesting people. Don’t bother yourself with the later. Cheers….
August 24th, 2007 at 10:42 pmCool! Tell him to come back to TP.
Comment by Zooey — August 24, 2007 @ 10:40 pm
I miss the Salesman. Tell him I said hello, Mak.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:42 pmZooey, would it kill you to register?
August 24th, 2007 at 10:45 pmEgg, you can tell him yourself.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:46 pmZooey, would it kill you to register?
Comment by Makarios — August 24, 2007 @ 10:45 pm
Would it kill you to allow anonymous comments?
August 24th, 2007 at 10:47 pmZooey, would it kill you to register?
Comment by Makarios
__________________
Would it kill you to register on this site and abide by the rules?
We all know the answer.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:48 pmWould it kill you to allow anonymous comments?
Comment by Zooey — August 24, 2007 @ 10:47 pm
——–
No.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:48 pmWould it kill you to register on this site and abide by the rules?
We all know the answer.
Comment by trueblue — August 24, 2007 @ 10:48 pm
——
No.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:48 pmAnd KEEP the comments there, Mak?
August 24th, 2007 at 10:48 pmAm I reading this right… the Mackerel is operating some sort of “cyber-rest stop” wherein weary bloggers can relieve themselves?
August 24th, 2007 at 10:48 pmThen stop deleting free speech.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:49 pmHow is this different from Foley? Well, there was only one page and it was consensual. With Foley there were numerous pages and many found his advances objectionable. What Studds did was wrong and he was censured for it. What Foley did was also wrong and he doesn’t seem to be being held accountable.
Comment by bilbogaggins — August 24, 2007 @ 8:50 pm
Dan Crane/Republican. Studds probably is too.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:50 pmAm I reading this right… the Mackerel is operating some sort of “cyber-rest stop†wherein weary bloggers can relieve themselves?
Comment by The Republic of Stupidity — August 24, 2007 @ 10:48 pm
We’re on Mr Pee’s blog right now, TRoS! Willyloman is there. Join us!
August 24th, 2007 at 10:54 pmComment by GerryStuddswillhauntDemsforevermore — August 24, 2007 @ 7:08 pm
Daniel Bever Crane (born January 10, 1936) is an American politician. He served as a Republican member of the U.S. House of Representatives and served from 1979 to 1985.
This is the guy who got busted with Studds you hypocritical cherry-picking pieces of crap.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:54 pmThen stop deleting free speech.
Comment by trueblue — August 24, 2007 @ 10:49 pm
——
If they hadn’t started talking about beastiality, I wouldn’t have.
August 24th, 2007 at 10:57 pm“Mackerel is operating some sort of “cyber-rest stopâ€
Mackeral is nasty tasting stuff unless you smoke it first. Just sayingas a fishmonger.
August 24th, 2007 at 11:01 pmMackeral likes the fact Foley won’t get busted.
August 24th, 2007 at 11:06 pmWell what do they think Foley was doing conversing with those teenage boys? He asked them all to measure their rods for him, and to give a date and time to meet him, so he was soliciting them for sex.
August 24th, 2007 at 11:16 pmMackeral likes the fact Foley won’t get busted.
Comment by ForTruth — August 24, 2007 @ 11:06 pm
Maybe Makaroni was a page….?
August 24th, 2007 at 11:17 pmMaybe Makaroni was a page….?
Comment by Zooey — August 24, 2007 @ 11:17 pm
Make that a “back” page…
August 24th, 2007 at 11:26 pmWhew! The party of perverts and freaks catches a break…
August 25th, 2007 at 12:22 amI forget, exactly how old were these “boys� I thought they were in their late teens, and actually 18 or older by the time he ever met with them in person.
.
Comment by Jason M. Hendler — August 24, 2007 @ 9:36 pm
But you forget how old they actually were. So you will defend the pedophile Foley, who finally was caught and resigned after a decade of chasing young boys around Congress, even though you admit right here that you don’t know the facts. why don’t you just move to North Korea? They like that kind of thoughtless loyalty. Or maybe you should live in a kennel, since you are closer to behavior and morals to a dog than a human. F*cking Nazi.
August 25th, 2007 at 12:26 amWhere the hell is daryll?
August 25th, 2007 at 12:34 am“Mark Foley (R-Fla.) resigned yesterday amid reports that he had sent sexually … instant messages provided by current and former pages under the age of 18. …
August 25th, 2007 at 1:54 amhttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/ content/article/2006/09/29/AR2006092901574.html -
Foley was protected by the republican leadership which is partly why republicans lost Congress in 2006. They were more interested protecting their party than protecting the pages. The pages were their responsibility yet they protected Foley instead of protecting them.
August 25th, 2007 at 5:19 amProbus, your party is the party of sheep-fukers. Why don’t you just SHUT the Fuk UP!!!
August 25th, 2007 at 5:42 amThe republicans would rather protect a Congressional seat in FL than protect our kids from pedophiles.
August 25th, 2007 at 5:43 amProbus, the Dems consider a 9 year old girl a consenting adult, you fuking hypocrite!
August 25th, 2007 at 5:44 amThe democrats are the party of family values.
August 25th, 2007 at 5:48 amThe DemocRATs are the party of PlannedMurderhood!!!
August 25th, 2007 at 5:49 amAbortion is a woman’s right. It is a privacy issue and government should stay out of people’s lives.
August 25th, 2007 at 5:52 amAbortion is murder, libs are against the death penalty…
THAT’S CALLED HYPOCRISY, MY LIBTARDED FRIEND!!!!!!!!!!!!
August 25th, 2007 at 5:53 amWhile Bush is obsessed with saving embryos soldiers die everyday in Iraq.
August 25th, 2007 at 6:09 amBush isn’t obsessed with anything except bringing some morality back to The UNITED STATES of AMERICA!!!
August 25th, 2007 at 6:13 amBush can save soldiers’ lives by bring them home to their families so they don’t die from IEDs.
August 25th, 2007 at 6:13 amDon’t worry about those IEDs, Probureno. WE ARE GOING TO BOMB THE FUK OUT OF IRAN!!!!!!!
After all, they are the ones who make them!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
August 25th, 2007 at 6:15 amIf we go into Iran more soldiers will die. We have already lost too many.
August 25th, 2007 at 6:16 amWE’RE GOING TO BOMB IRAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THE ONLY SOLDIERS THAT WILL DIE ARE IRANIAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HEyOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
August 25th, 2007 at 6:17 amThe cost of going to war with any country is too high for even that one family that loses a son, father, or brother.
August 25th, 2007 at 6:18 amNO IT AIN’T!!!!!!!!
WE ALREADY HAVE THE BOMBS!!!!!!!!!!!!
IT’S ONLY A MATTER OF DUMPING THEM ON THE IRANIANS!!!!!!!!!!!
HEyOOOOOOOOOoOOOOOOOOOOoOOOOOOOOOoOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
August 25th, 2007 at 6:19 amMore than 4000 American families who have lost loved ones in Iraq would disagree with you.
August 25th, 2007 at 6:21 amWell, Probster.
I’m going to sleep for a few hours, knowing happily that IRan will soon be blown to !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
August 25th, 2007 at 6:22 amMore than 4000 American families who have lost loved ones in Iraq would disagree with you.
Comment by Probus — August 25, 2007 @ 6:21 am
——-
I couldn’t give less of a shit!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
IRAN WILL BE GONE SOON, MARK MY WORDS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
YOU FILTHY LIBERAL, TREE-HUGGER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
August 25th, 2007 at 6:23 amIf we go to war with Iran many soldiers will not have that luxury.
August 25th, 2007 at 6:23 amIf we go to war with Iran many soldiers will not have that luxury.
Comment by Probus — August 25, 2007 @ 6:23 am
———
Sure they will, knowing that the Iranian people are suffering, makes me comfortable and well, just plain happy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
As I’m sure it does for all REAL AMERICAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
August 25th, 2007 at 6:24 amMay be you can explain to the dead soldiers’ families how you can be happy when Americans are dying.
August 25th, 2007 at 6:28 amHas anyone else noticed a few things about the feeb Makarios? For instance he posted until 1:54am on Aug 25 and then was back posting furiously at 5:38am Aug 25. Not much sleep for someone who definitely needs to clear his head. But there is a definite change in tone in the early morning Makarios vs. the late night Makarios… lots of caps, much more anger & vitriol, barely any intelligent repartee and statements like “I couldn’t care less” when asked about the death to American soldiers. I suggest the obvious… Makarios is just a conglomerate of Reptard stooges taking shifts at posting on TP.
August 25th, 2007 at 9:55 amMaybe he’s doing meth….or maybe he’s just a serious “coffee achiever.”
August 25th, 2007 at 10:49 amMr. Pee’s deletions of posts on his blog doesn’t surprise me one bit. After all, he’s a scumbag that enjoys screwing over other people’s blogs and wielding an iron fist on his own. He’s a perfect example of ‘Do as I say, not as I do’….like your typical megachurch leader (Haggard), your typical chairman of the group that hunts down pedophiles while being a pedophile himself (Foley), and your typical troll (Mr. Pee and others). I.E. Like your typical neocon that has hijacked the Republican Party.
August 25th, 2007 at 10:51 amThe government gets more profit from gasoline taxes than the oil corporations do per gallon
August 26th, 2007 at 12:59 pmwhich brings up another point, how is the government going to get paid if we significantly reduce oil consumption? the solar tax?
August 26th, 2007 at 1:00 pmMay be you can explain to the dead soldiers’ families how you can be happy when Americans are dying.Comment by Probus — August 25, 2007
August 26th, 2007 at 1:05 pmwhy do you care about our volunteer army and if they take the risk. you are the party of pro abortion, pro suicide. You want to see what you stand for just google an image of a late term abortion and see what is done to the baby during this ‘right’
Contact Nancy Pelosi and tell her to release Foley’s records. What are we trying to accomplish, if not transparency in government concerning the lead up to the war, no-bid contracts, etc., so why protect a sexual predator. Let the investigators examine His congressional computers.
Comment by Brian Bailey — August 24, 2007 @ 6:52 pm
Sounds like Foley might not be the only one who fears transparency. ;)
August 27th, 2007 at 11:12 am