Fear-mongering Bush warns of Iranian ‘nuclear holocaust.’
By on Aug 28th, 2007 at 5:36 pm
Fear-mongering Bush warns of Iranian ‘nuclear holocaust.’
In his speech about Iraq to the American Legion today, President Bush warned that allowing Iran to pursue “technology that could lead to nuclear weapons threatens to put a region already known for instability and violence under the shadow of a nuclear holocaust.” Watch it:
[flv http://video.thinkprogress.org/2007/08/NuclearHolocaust.320.240.flv]
As Steve Benen points out, Bush’s hyperbolic rhetoric about a “nuclear holocaust” in the Middle East is reminiscent of his pre-war claims that “we couldn’t wait for actual proof to justify an invasion, because the ’smoking gun could be a mushroom cloud.’”
Sort Comments By: Top Rated | Date
249 Responses to “Fear-mongering Bush warns of Iranian ‘nuclear holocaust.’”
View Most Popular
Advertisement
What We're About
What We're Fighting For
What We're Fighting Against
Featured
Subscribe to the Progress Report
Topic CloudView topics sorted by popularity
Bachmann
Boehner
Bush
Cheney
Civil Rights
Congress
Corporate Ethics
DADT
Economy
Energy
Environment
Ethics
Fox News
Gingrich
Global Warming
Guantanamo
Hannity
Health Care
International Relations
Iran
Iraq
Justice
LGBT
Limbaugh
Liz Cheney
McCain
Media
Military
O'Reilly
Obama
Palin
Pelosi
Race
Radical Right
Religion
Rove
Sanford
Sotomayor
Steele
Supreme Court
Terrorism
ThinkProgress
Tiller
Torture
Women's Rights
Visit Our Affiliated Sites
Reports
In-depth studies on select topics
Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.
ArchivesBlog Roll
Frist?
August 28th, 2007 at 5:37 pmAre you Rapture-Ready? Get your plastic Jesus & wait for the ships.
August 28th, 2007 at 5:38 pmWho is this idiot?
Look, if we wanna talk policy, we'll find a Democrat. If we want an anonymous blowjob in a public restroom, we'll go find a Republican.
OK?
August 28th, 2007 at 5:39 pm.
So he's going to attack Israel?
August 28th, 2007 at 5:39 pmOh Christ, the most recent NIE said they would not be nuke ready until between 2010 and 2015. And for chrissakes, this is gonna be a self-fulfilling prophecy, as hard as Bush pushes this shit. They wouldn't even have an extremist like Ahmadinejad had Bush not given his Axis of Evil speech. What kind of a dipshit is this man. Uggh.
August 28th, 2007 at 5:40 pmWhy is Iran having nuclear weaponry any different than Pakistan, Israel, or Saudi having nuclear weaponry? For that matter, how is it different from the US having it? When was the last time Iran attacked someone? The problem is that it is a strategic weapon, not a tactical one. The first time you try to use it, all of the other countries that already have it (and we have the most) will pound you into the stone age.
August 28th, 2007 at 5:41 pmBush strategy:
August 28th, 2007 at 5:41 pmIf we keep talking about the coming war with Iran, people might forget the current war with Iraq.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/iran/story/0,,2157814,00.html?gusrc=rss&feed=networkfront
August 28th, 2007 at 5:42 pmAugust 28th, 2007 at 5:42 pm
I think the Iranian nukes are somewhat east of Tehran, and south and west, somewhat.
August 28th, 2007 at 5:42 pmSmoking gun? Mushroom cloud?
August 28th, 2007 at 5:43 pmSmoking Mushrooms?
WTF, I liked him better when he was drinking. Last week.
#
Bush strategy:
If we keep talking about the coming war with Iran, people might forget the current war with Iraq.
Comment by tarazan — August 28, 2007 @ 5:41 pm
-----------
Exactly, that's how he got into Iraq in the first place! Transitioning from Afghanistan into Iraq.
August 28th, 2007 at 5:44 pm#
I think the Iranian nukes are somewhat east of Tehran, and south and west, somewhat.
Comment by RUCerious — August 28, 2007 @ 5:42 pm
#
And they have the ability to strike the US within 15 minutes! And he gassed his own people! We won't be forcing regime change, or nation building. The whole campaign will only last a few weeks!
August 28th, 2007 at 5:45 pmBush is the most volatile and dangerous leader in the world today.
August 28th, 2007 at 5:45 pmHis bellicose talk, his belligerent attitude, his arrogance and stubbornness are like those of a tyrant with the most powerful arsenal in the world.
The only one putting that region under the threat of a nuclear holocaust is Bushco. We want and need Iran's Oil.
August 28th, 2007 at 5:46 pmWho is this idiot?
Look, if we wanna talk policy, we’ll find a Democrat. If we want an anonymous blowjob in a public restroom, we’ll go find a Republican.
OK?
.
Comment by Grand Moff Texan — August 28, 2007 @ 5:39 pm
I just spit hot coffee through my nose.
August 28th, 2007 at 5:46 pmDon't forget they will welcome us as liberators!
August 28th, 2007 at 5:46 pmBush is right.
August 28th, 2007 at 5:49 pmAnd we just haven't found Saddam's WMD yet.
They're there.
Still looking.
Any day now. . . . .
If we keep talking about the coming war with Iran, people might forget the current war with Iraq.
Comment by tarazan — August 28, 2007 @ 5:41 pm
It might as well be Iowa for that matter. The ignorance of the 28%'s prevents them from being able to locate sovereign nations on a map and allows them to view the entire middleeast region as a homogeneous collection of subhumans who need only recognize the Christian God given right of the US to act as it wishes
August 28th, 2007 at 5:49 pmOnly 25% believe the boy who cried wolf.
August 28th, 2007 at 5:49 pmDid he take questions after the speech?
Did anyone ask him if he knows how to spell Armaggedon??
August 28th, 2007 at 5:51 pmIf we want an anonymous blowjob in a public restroom, we’ll go find a Republican.
OK?
.
Comment by Grand Moff Texan — August 28, 2007 @ 5:39 pm
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...
August 28th, 2007 at 5:52 pmThe Eyeran war will only last a few weeks or a few months, at most.
The electricity generated by their nuke plants, safe in 'Murka's hands, alone will sustain the new Eyeranian economy.
August 28th, 2007 at 5:52 pmSee what Craig and Foley started. Now God is angry and the holocaust is coming. Thanks a lot Republicans.
August 28th, 2007 at 5:53 pmGrand Moff Texan, I salute you. That was funny.
I will be the first to admit I have the symptoms of BDS, maybe even in the final stages. I see that arrogant and deceitful little shit and I want to fling broadheads at the screen.
He has done more harm to our country than any person EVER. If he bombs Iran to kickstart his Armageddon for all the Jebus blowers, we will be done as a country.
How the hell did such a pathetic, weak coward bring our country to this point?
Where's a coup when you really need one?
August 28th, 2007 at 5:54 pmThis man is dangerous! Can't we have impeachment, yet? PLEASE!!!!!
August 28th, 2007 at 5:55 pmLoad up the Willy Pete, boys, we're commencin' to shock and awe. Does Bush really think the Paraguayan military can protect him if he decides to magnify the current FUBAR to previously undreamt of heights?
August 28th, 2007 at 5:55 pmIf he gets away with starting military aggression against Iran, I'll personally hold the Congress, both Dems and pukes accountable for not IMPEACHING his ass when they had the chance.
Goddamn it!
August 28th, 2007 at 5:56 pmSomeone needs to lock Junior in his room until january 2009 and take away ALL his toys until a grownup is able to take charge.
What can "we the people" do if this maniac decides his destiny lies in going out with a bang ?
Do we start marching on washington now, or do we wait until marshal law is declared before we take away the keys ?
August 28th, 2007 at 5:56 pmSomeone needs to needs to hog tie Bush and put a gag-ball in his mouth so that we can live the rest of his term in relative peace.
August 28th, 2007 at 5:57 pmWhy is it fear-monger?....It's true.
August 28th, 2007 at 5:58 pm"The public gets what they deserve, not what they demand."
August 28th, 2007 at 5:58 pmHell, punk rock figured this out a LONG time ago.
Does anyone listen to President Prissy Pants anymore?
August 28th, 2007 at 5:59 pmIran's nuclear ambitions alone don't warrant an attack from the US, however, the US has good evidence that Iran is providing weapons to Iraqi insurgents to kill US troops, and Iran has recently started shelling the Kurds in Iraq. These are acts of war. The US should show Iran this evidence and give them two options:
1. Immidiately cease all activities in Iraq, stop the flow of weapons to Iraq, and hand over nuclear program to international control.
or
2. Prepare to get bombed.
Anyone have a problem with that?
August 28th, 2007 at 5:59 pmAm I mistaken, or didn't the Dems in Congress give this worthless POS the okay to blast away ?
August 28th, 2007 at 5:59 pmNice job Nancy, good thing that real black cloud of confusion you might have caused by bringing up impeachment is 'off of your freaking vanity'.
"they're my bombs and i can do whatever i want with them!"
August 28th, 2007 at 5:59 pm"right, uncle dick?"
did anyone see the CNN / CHRISTIANE AMANPOUR special
"God's Warriors" last week?
i saw only part... fascinating...
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2007/gods.warriors/
doubtfull dubya & co watched...
August 28th, 2007 at 6:00 pmHey, Chimp! I thought you were on vacation? Go home and STFU already. We'll call you after the next epic disaster.
August 28th, 2007 at 6:00 pmYeah well what can Bush say? He got 160000 men down there and soon itll be 200000. If he doesnt want see his head seperated by an axe he better pays attention his 200000 dont get nuked.
He got a lousy war and history books will be merciless if his troops get killed in a NWO war that suddenly turned into a Persian holocaust.
August 28th, 2007 at 6:00 pmCanada seems to be getting a little uppity what with claiming rights to potential petroleum resources which based on a map seem like they are probably in Canada. What say you Georgie? Time to preemt this or what?
August 28th, 2007 at 6:00 pmSomeone needs to needs to hog tie Bush and put a gag-ball in his mouth so that we can live the rest of his term in relative peace.
Comment by dim wit — August 28, 2007 @ 5:57 pm
Now, now, he doesn't deserve to have any fun if he's going to behave this way.
August 28th, 2007 at 6:00 pm"I think the Iranian nukes are somewhat east of Tehran, and south and west, somewhat.
Comment by RUCerious"
Actually, that's NORTH, south and west. Somewhat.
August 28th, 2007 at 6:01 pmI'm shocked that he didn't mention the infamous "mushroom cloud" of his pre-Iraq daze!
August 28th, 2007 at 6:02 pmC'mon georgie just go to war with canada...at least the 28%ers know where it it.
August 28th, 2007 at 6:02 pmAnyone have a problem with that?
Comment by Michael Savage, PuD — August 28, 2007 @ 5:59 pm
Yes!
August 28th, 2007 at 6:02 pmWHY DID BUSH ALLOW IRAN TO PURSUE ITS NUCLEAR WEAPONS PROGRAM FOR SO MANY YEARS?
August 28th, 2007 at 6:02 pmnanlichi kiss Grand Moff Texan texas size balls while you at it
August 28th, 2007 at 6:02 pmBush has gone "round the bend" - that's now patently clear. Crying wolf a second time simply doesn't have the same effect as the first charade did. This man needs to get a life and soon.
August 28th, 2007 at 6:02 pm#
Iran’s nuclear ambitions alone don’t warrant an attack from the US, however, the US has good evidence that Iran is providing weapons to Iraqi insurgents to kill US troops, and Iran has recently started shelling the Kurds in Iraq. These are acts of war. The US should show Iran this evidence and give them two options:
1. Immidiately cease all activities in Iraq, stop the flow of weapons to Iraq, and hand over nuclear program to international control.
or
2. Prepare to get bombed.
Anyone have a problem with that?
Comment by Michael Savage, PhD — August 28, 2007 @ 5:59 pm
------------------------
Didn't we also have "good evidence" of WMD's in Iraq??
August 28th, 2007 at 6:03 pmOMG. How can he be permitted to stand up there and continue to make a jacka$$ of himself like this?
August 28th, 2007 at 6:03 pmOnly the fact that there's no proof of either statement of yours. If they are acts of war, they are acts of war against the Kurds or the Iraqis, not the USA. Your whole theory is ass-backwards, and most probably based on the lies of the same lying liars that got us into this mess in the first place.
August 28th, 2007 at 6:03 pmDid anyone else just scream "NU-CLE-AR" at the screen? I can't take him seriously when he talks like that. Hell, I can't take him seriously at all.
August 28th, 2007 at 6:04 pmOMG. How can he be permitted to stand up there and continue to make a jacka$$ of himself like this?
Comment by veritas — August 28, 2007 @ 6:03 pm
It's all he knows?
August 28th, 2007 at 6:05 pmActually, that’s NORTH, south and west. Somewhat.
Comment by mongo — August 28, 2007 @ 6:01 pm
OK, Next time I'll go look up the actual quote. Too much of a hurry today..!~!
August 28th, 2007 at 6:06 pmNeoturds,
Slam those hard-ons inside a big, hardback book, cause Iran will NEVER hit a nuke-u-lar country.
Wont you dumb f*cks at least TRY to learn something from the Cold War.
August 28th, 2007 at 6:06 pmIs it 2003 again?
Tired Of Fighting is coming soon to a thread near you.
August 28th, 2007 at 6:06 pmC’mon georgie just go to war with canada…at least the 28%ers know where it it.
Comment by bobh — August 28, 2007 @ 6:02 pm
Not true...
Dog Eat Dog, 07/29/02
A girl was asked "By land mass, what is the largest country in the Americas?"
Her answer: Asia.
Her justification for that response once she was told the answer was Canada... “Hey, I don’t live in Canada!â€
August 28th, 2007 at 6:06 pmveritas ~ he's got the jacka$$ schtick down pat.
August 28th, 2007 at 6:06 pmIt might as well be Iowa for that matter. The ignorance of the 28%’s prevents them from being able to locate sovereign nations on a map and allows them to view the entire middleeast region as a homogeneous collection of subhumans who need only recognize the Christian God given right of the US to act as it wishes
Comment by dbadass — August 28, 2007 @ 5:49 pm
Sounds like manifest destiny.
August 28th, 2007 at 6:07 pmC’mon georgie just go to war with canada…at least the 28%ers know where it it.
Comment by bobh — August 28, 2007 @ 6:02 pm
Well if you accept "up" and North as synonymous
August 28th, 2007 at 6:07 pmis the wiener aware of all the weapons and terrists
August 28th, 2007 at 6:07 pmthat are coming from our buddies SAUDI ARABIA?
just wonderin'...
...
Nukes, nukes, who's got the nukes? Let's see: the Indians of India have nuclear weapons, the Pakistani dictator has nukes, the Israelis have nukes, the Chinese communist dictators have nukes, the French have nukes, the British have nukes, the Russians have nukes and the Americans have nukes, and yet the insane Bush is all worried about the Iranians possibly being able to defend themselves against western imperial aggression?
Bush was insane about Saddam and Iraq: it was all lies.
Now Bush is insane about Iran; probably just more lies and paranoia.
Of course, there is the small manner of the US CIA and the Brits overthrowing the Iranian democracy back in 1953 and installing the dictator Shah, who tortured and murdered thousands of his fellow countrymen...
August 28th, 2007 at 6:07 pmWho is this idiot ?
Look, if we wanna talk policy, we’ll find a Defeatocrat. If we want an anonymous blowjob in The Oral Office, we’ll go find Clinton.
OK GM Tex?
August 28th, 2007 at 6:08 pmThese Armageddonist are gonna get us all killed
August 28th, 2007 at 6:08 pmWe also have good evidence that Saudi Arabia has armed the Sunnis. Hell, we have evidence that we've armed all sides. Should we bomb ourselves?
August 28th, 2007 at 6:08 pmBoo. Hehehe, look at em run Dick. Do it again. BOO! Hehehe, now their running to the other side Dick. I just love scaring em. Boo Boo Boo! There they go again Dick. Hehehe, I love to see them scamper around. I'm the Decider.
August 28th, 2007 at 6:09 pmMichael Savage, PhD sez:
Yes, I have a problem with you making spurious claims with not even an attempt at substantiation.
Before the U.S. shows Iran this "evidence", it would be nice if we could see it first. If it's anything like the "evidence" of WMDs in Iraq, I'd rather hold off before we start yet another unwinnable war.
August 28th, 2007 at 6:11 pmYeah, I've got a problem, Michael Savage. I want to see your evidence. Real evidence, not little power points with pictures of plastic truck toys. And I get to question you about the evidence and the sources of that evidence. And you have to answer to Congress. Then and only then may you ask their permission to go forward. Kapish?
August 28th, 2007 at 6:14 pmit will never end with this President. He will be preaching this stuff for the rest of his life. To admit to himself that he is wrong would be far too painful a reality for him to face.
August 28th, 2007 at 6:16 pm1. Immidiately cease all activities in Iraq, stop the flow of weapons to Iraq, and hand over nuclear program to international control.
or
2. Prepare to get bombed.
Anyone have a problem with that?
Comment by Michael Savage, PhD — August 28, 2007 @ 5:59 pm
Even the French agree.
August 28th, 2007 at 6:18 pmHe is completely out of his fu(king mind.
August 28th, 2007 at 6:18 pmRingo: "Why is it fear-monger?….It’s true."
Just like it was for Iraq, right? How many lies does your dear leader have to tell you before you get up off your knees, have some self-respect, and think for yourself?
August 28th, 2007 at 6:19 pmEven the French agree.
Comment by r — August 28, 2007 @ 6:18 pm
The French are always bombed.
August 28th, 2007 at 6:19 pmI believe there is good evidence that the 9/11 hijackers came from Saudi Arabia.
August 28th, 2007 at 6:19 pm1. Immidiately cease all activities in Iraq, stop the flow of weapons to Iraq, and hand over nuclear program to international control.
Seems like decent advice maybe the US should take it.
August 28th, 2007 at 6:19 pmIs there a fear mongering Bush action figure? Can I get it on the NeoNuts R' US website?
August 28th, 2007 at 6:20 pmI could care less if Israel is wiped off the map. Watch how calm things get around the world without the jews. Rudy in '08' baby!!!
August 28th, 2007 at 6:20 pmIf we can't win in Iraq or Afghanistan, how are we gonna win against Iran?
August 28th, 2007 at 6:22 pmIf we can’t win in Iraq or Afghanistan, how are we gonna win against Iran?
Comment by Rapture — August 28, 2007 @ 6:22 pm
We can always fall back on a whack at the mighty Grenada
August 28th, 2007 at 6:25 pmHe's just intent on making such an ungodly mess of the world that no mere mortal Democrat could ever put it right. It would be absolutely unconscionable for a lame duck to start a pre-emptive ideological war with only a bit more than a year to go and just dump it in the lap of the next president.
August 28th, 2007 at 6:27 pm"the US has good evidence that Iran is providing weapons to Iraqi insurgents to kill US troops, and Iran has recently started shelling the Kurds in Iraq."
Oh really, if they had this good evidence, then why haven't they publicized it? And, the US has good evidence that Saudi Arabia is funding terrorists in Iraq (many more than al Qaeda), so do you advocate we invade Saudi Arabia or drop bombs on them?
August 28th, 2007 at 6:30 pm80. The believe Jeebus will ride down on a cloud and put it right. They REALLY f-ing do. And in their mind, they don't even have to deal with the mess because they get raptured away. Great, sensible foreign policy that.
August 28th, 2007 at 6:33 pmIt would be absolutely unconscionable ...
Comment by troqua — August 28, 2007 @ 6:27 pm
yep... that's all the excuse he needs...
August 28th, 2007 at 6:33 pm...
He’s just intent on making such an ungodly mess of the world that no mere mortal Democrat could ever put it right. It would be absolutely unconscionable for a lame duck to start a pre-emptive ideological war with only a bit more than a year to go and just dump it in the lap of the next president.
Comment by troqua — August 28, 2007 @ 6:27 pm
He couldn't have come up with this on his own. This smell rovish. If GOP hope is lost for the upcoming election, screw stuff up beyond any reasonable repair. Hunker down for four years while blaming the opposition. The ADD American Idol crowd can't remember anything from one day to the next so then hope to regain control in the following cycle.
August 28th, 2007 at 6:34 pmSo little Bobby, what did I say to piss you off?
Was it the insult of your God, Bush?
Was it the broadheads comment?
Was it the cry for a coup, just one?
Or was it the reference to the Repugnicunts giving head in the bathroom?
I am betting the latter, it struck the generic homophobic chord all you idiots have.
Face it, your God Bush is a loser and you worship a loser. In case you forget that simple fact, engrave it on the back of your buddy's belt so you will have a constant reminder.
August 28th, 2007 at 6:35 pmbecause they get raptured away....
Comment by Menehune — August 28, 2007 @ 6:33 pm
good.
August 28th, 2007 at 6:35 pmhow long do we normal beings get on this earth without those crazies?
...
How do we know he isn't talking about Iraq. His verbal skills are so poor?
We have over 9,000 nuclear war heads. We've supplied Israel with over 200 nuclear war heads. And we've stock piled even more in Europe. Iran has none.
Who's the terrorist, now?
August 28th, 2007 at 6:35 pmBoy, these guys will never forgive Iran for overthrowing our puppet dictator.
August 28th, 2007 at 6:35 pmIt sounds like GDubya is just displaying his wishful thinking here ..... after all, he is a WAR president, and if he had another, he would be a 2 war president, that would put him one up on his Paps. Woo Hoo!!
August 28th, 2007 at 6:36 pmI believe there is good evidence that the 9/11 hijackers came from Saudi Arabia.
Comment by ForTruth — August 28, 2007 @ 6:19 pm
Only 15 were from Saudi Arabia. But the financier, Osama bin Forgotten, did as well.
Why don't we attack Norway? They gave a Nobel Peace Prize to Carter and that really pissed off W.
August 28th, 2007 at 6:37 pm"It would be absolutely unconscionable for a lame duck to start a pre-emptive ideological war with only a bit more than a year to go and just dump it in the lap of the next president."
And you think that Bush has a conscience. He has proved time and time again that he lacks a conscience and he lacks a soul. I wonder if he will be lonely when he is in hell and Laura is in heaven.
August 28th, 2007 at 6:38 pmit will never end with this President. He will be preaching this stuff for the rest of his life. To admit to himself that he is wrong would be far too painful a reality for him to face.
Comment by John
Exactly! Kings never admit they have done any wrong. It would soil their "I draw power from God" fantasy. We are sooo screwed...
August 28th, 2007 at 6:39 pmThe three staunch allies 'England,Spain and Italy' prime ministers who supported the war in Iraq are gone.
Spain : Prime Minister Jose Alfredo Aznar lost the re-election bid in 2004,a year after the Iraq war began,after 8 years in office.
Spain decided to withdraw troops from Iraq,as a result of his defeat. and they did.
Italy: Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi lost his re-election in 2006,because of the war in Iraq,after 6 years in office
England: Prime Minister Tony Blair left this year because his party wanted him out, it was because of the Iraq war,after serving over 10 years as prime minister.
England is withdrawing their final units from Southern Iraq in the coming weeks if not days.
The question is where is the Coalition Of The Willing now?. America is left alone in this war in Iraq, even by their closest allies.
August 28th, 2007 at 6:47 pmWith his history, it's pretty unbelievable that he can even stand up in front of a crowd, even of his own choosing and make these claims.
Seems like proof that he's just a well oiled puppet.
August 28th, 2007 at 6:48 pmI find it funny that he's citing the instability of the region... that he created.
Ahhhh. Is it 2009 yet?
~Sean
August 28th, 2007 at 6:50 pmThe mushroom cloud has been evoked. We'll be dropping bombs on Iran in less than six months.
-GSD
August 28th, 2007 at 6:52 pmkwaaack, kwak-Does anyone still even listen?
August 28th, 2007 at 6:53 pmThe thing I think is funny and sick about Neo-Cons, is: If you actually thought there was a nuclear threat from Iran, AND you cared about the U.S. is this how you would rally the country?: "I think I'll be a dick and blame the opposition for 6 years never even trying to get them behind my policies. Yes, that should help us avert the disasters I warn everyone about!"
NO you wouldn't! because that wouldn't get both parties behind you, and would likely bring about the disaster. Therefore this president is:
- an ignormaus, or
- using everyone for his own gain
People cannot think in this country. How can anyone be so naive as to think they aren't being used by this jackal? Put the stupid f*cker in jail already.
August 28th, 2007 at 6:53 pmonce more our deluded and dangerous president is wrong, this time by thinking we're all still listening to his lies and fuzzy math
August 28th, 2007 at 6:54 pmonce more our deluded and dangerous president is wrong, this time by thinking we’re all still listening to his lies and fuzzy math
Comment by truthfairy — August 28, 2007 @ 6:54 pm
The problem is, there are still 28% of the people that DO listen, and worse, BELIEVE what comes from Darth's black heart through Duya's slack mouth. That is a scary thought!
August 28th, 2007 at 6:58 pmIt's ramping up, fellas. Iranians arrested in Baghdad after Bush speech. This has got Cheney written all over it.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/6967850.stm
August 28th, 2007 at 6:58 pmit will never end with this President. He will be preaching this stuff for the rest of his life. To admit to himself that he is wrong would be far too painful a reality for him to face.
Comment by John
Exactly! Kings never admit they have done any wrong. It would soil their “I draw power from God†fantasy. We are sooo screwed…
Comment by Tom — August 28, 2007 @ 6:39 pm
Actually ex-presidents have traditionally stepped into the background and let the winner of future elections enact their policy without ex-pres carping. Carter has been the clearest and most embarrassing example of a president not following this tradition.
Let's not criticize Bush for his possible future actions if we're not going to criticize Carter for what he’s already done.
August 28th, 2007 at 7:01 pmSome years back when I was a neighbor a dead fin whale washed ashore upwind of Walker's Point. Oddly enough that smell was less putrid. Somebody please pull on his "chock chain" this mutt just doesn't get it.
August 28th, 2007 at 7:03 pmLet’s not criticize Bush for his possible future actions if we’re not going to criticize Carter for what he’s already done.
Comment by r — August 28, 2007 @ 7:01 pm
Actually, I PRAISE Carter, for he sees the dangers to the country and the world and needs to speak up.
That is courage personified!
August 28th, 2007 at 7:03 pmr sez:
Refresh my memory, r...how many wars did Carter start?
August 28th, 2007 at 7:04 pmWarmonger for Israel - just like all the rest.
Deport AIPAC
August 28th, 2007 at 7:05 pmyawn.
August 28th, 2007 at 7:05 pmLet’s not criticize Bush for his possible future actions if we’re not going to criticize Carter for what he’s already done.
Comment by r — August 28, 2007 @ 7:01 pm
Carter is an American citizen and a patriot. he is also 100% correct in his criticisms of the jerkoff-in-thief. custom was fine while we had competent, legally-elected presidents working for the county's good in some way. Bush has brough criticisms from ex-presidents, including hsi father, on himself. You want North Korea, if you want free speech done away with.
August 28th, 2007 at 7:07 pm9/11 = pretext for ACQUISITION and DEPOPULATION of
IRAQ
LEBANON
IRAN
SYRIA
PAKISTAN
All to construct ERETZ ISRAEL with our blood and money.
DAVID ROCKEFELLER is the kingpin.
August 28th, 2007 at 7:09 pmWhy should we be concerned with people that said they'll destroy Israel get nukes? Who cares? We're libtards!
August 28th, 2007 at 7:09 pmWhy should we be concerned with people that said they’ll destroy Israel get nukes? Who cares? We’re libtards!
Comment by Toliver — August 28, 2007 @ 7:09 pm
Take another hit of meth, you aren't paranoid, and stupid enough to be a GOP senator yet.
August 28th, 2007 at 7:12 pm"Let’s not criticize Bush for his possible future actions if we’re not going to criticize Carter for what he’s already done.
Comment by r"
Stop already with the attempts at deflection. This has nothing to do with any other president. This guy's dismal record and ridiculous statements will be an albatross around his neck and a black mark on the republic party for years, if not decades.
And the fact is shrub *will* go to his grave preaching paranoia about the dangers of saddam that he averted and the evils of democrats and how they turned the country/world against him--like the crazy great-grandfather debilitated by alzheimers screaming incoherently at passersby and publicly urinating yet again on the neighbor's lawn.
August 28th, 2007 at 7:12 pmWhy should we be concerned with people that said they’ll destroy Israel get nukes? Who cares? We’re libtards!
Comment by Toliver — August 28, 2007
What if it was Israel that installed the apparent lunatic in the first place?
What if Israel is telling him EXACTLY what to say in order to provide apparent justification for an offensive strike against Iran?
How many times has the US installed a puppet?
August 28th, 2007 at 7:14 pmhey ace....good to see you again! ^_^
August 28th, 2007 at 7:15 pmhey ace….good to see you again! ^_^
Comment by TripMaster Monkey — August 28, 2007
Roger that and back at you.
I give it half-an-hour, 45 minutes tops.
August 28th, 2007 at 7:16 pm------------------
Bush, et al. simply serve Israel. That is all.
Dual citizenship holding Jew/American as next AG.
Think about it.
NO MORE WAR FOR ISRAEL!
We need elected officials that serve Americans; nothing else.
------------------
August 28th, 2007 at 7:16 pmMr. Conyers:
The votes weren't there to impeach Nixon at the BEGINNING OF THE PROCESS either. Does the concept of "DISCOVERY" ring any bells,with INDICTMENTS and TESTIMONY UNDER OATH by ALL the CO-CONSPIRATORS?
Public opinion moves votes. Public Testimony, UNDER OATH moves public opinion. Your argument about nt having the votes prior to the investigation is an AIPAC-SPONSORED RED HERRING.
No shit, Sherlock!
Begin the process NOW and see where DISCOVERY and TESTIMONY leads.
It is your Constitutional Obligation, and the Voters gave you a MANDATE to INVESTIGATE, and cleanse the system of corruption and politicization of FEDERAL OFFICES.
Karl Rove was a POLITICAL OPERATIVE officed in the PEOPLE's HOUSE.
THAT is ILLEGAL.
Do your job - or suffer the consequences. The Anti-AIPAC vote will end your career in 2008.
Are you with US or against US?
August 28th, 2007 at 7:17 pmActually ex-presidents have traditionally stepped into the background and let the winner of future elections enact their policy without ex-pres carping. Carter has been the clearest and most embarrassing example of a president not following this tradition.
Comment by r — August 28, 2007 @ 7:01 pm
Tradition? FDR died. Truman, maybe. Eisenhower, probably, although he left with a bang. Kennedy, um, dead. LBJ, left in a huff. Nixon, left in disgrace but made attempts at comebacks over the years. Ford, uh, who knows? Carter, some of us believe has been terrific. Reagan, left gaga. GHWB, certainly has made his presence known. Bill Clinton, he's been polite. . . .
What is this tradition of which you speak? Something from the 19th century?
August 28th, 2007 at 7:18 pmFor the ENTIRE TRUTH of the CONSPIRACY, Read through this thread on The Nation:
http://www.thenation.com/blogs/notion?pid=226647#comment
“Plunger†on Page 1 and “Rese†on Page 2 connect more dots than you ever knew existed.
Send this link everywhere, to everyone you know, and tell them to take the time to read all this in order to save their country.
Education is critical:
"As people do better, they start voting like Republicans - unless they have too much education and vote Democratic, which proves there can be too much of a good thing."
Karl Rove.
August 28th, 2007 at 7:19 pmNo Katrina accountability for Chertoff (the Israeli) - thanks to Joe Lieberman, the AIPAC representative.
Joe Lieberman Betrays Hurricane Katrina victims after being elected in 2006, with the help of the GOP:
http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/60797/
A prominent Republican who chairs I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby's legal defense fund in the CIA leak affair co-hosted a fundraiser Wednesday for Sen. Joe Lieberman, who is running for re-election as an independent after losing the Democratic party primary.
Mel Sembler, a former Republican National Committee finance chairman, helped organize a reception that raised about a "couple hundred thousand dollars" for Lieberman, who was in attendance.
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2006/09/21/america/NA_POL_US_Connecticut_Senate.php
So Israeli agent Chertoff is protected by Israeli agent Lieberman who was backed by Israeli agent Sembler - the former Ambassador of Italy during the time frame of the Niger Forgery being planted in Rome -
http://patriotboy.blogspot.com/2005_11_13_patriotboy_archive.html#113186638454783857
The smoking gun of the lies that led to war:
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/context.jsp?item=June2002GhorbanifarMeeting
AIPAC's operatives, Ledeen, Rhode, Franklin (indicted for spying on behalf of AIPAC) Ghorbanifar, etc. were all present for this secret meeting.
AND Sembler was also the head of the "Save Israeli Agent Scooter Libby" defense fund.
And now the administration wants to put Chertoff in charge of the entire US Judicial System? Guess who Bush works for...AIPAC.
August 28th, 2007 at 7:24 pmWill Bush's MASTER Satan
PLEASE take this scumbag "home".
Feel free to bash his face in every minute for ETERNITY, Satan.
He's YOUR boy...
August 28th, 2007 at 7:31 pmIt won't be long before the C. Rice and D. Cheney parade to rally the nation behind this lunacy.
August 28th, 2007 at 7:32 pmr: "Actually ex-presidents have traditionally stepped into the background and let the winner of future elections enact their policy without ex-pres carping."
Your conservative media propagandists have been lying to you again and you're evidently too lazy to crack open a history book to find out for yourself. Herbert Hoover spent years traveling the country telling anyone who would listen that FDR was going to ruin the country with his New Deal. He even wrote and aggressively marketing a book on the subject. George HW Bush criticized Clinton's tax policy in 1994. Some of our earliest presidents spent years namecalling presidents who came after them. The right wing has invented this false history you have bought into with Carter in mind.
August 28th, 2007 at 7:44 pmTwo items from tonite's evening news
August 28th, 2007 at 7:49 pmRival Shiite militias in open combat cause cancellation of Religious festival in Karbala Iraq. Violence spreads to other cities in Iraq.
Iran's ahmedinejad offers help to Iraq, to conteract power vaccuum created by America's waning influence. He wants talks with the saudi's.
Sounds like everyone but Bush knows time is about up.
If there are any mushroom clouds let loose, let us pray that it happens at the White House.
August 28th, 2007 at 7:51 pmSomebody put this maniac in a straight jacket and remove him...he is embarrassing himself, again. Must be the alcohol and drugs.
August 28th, 2007 at 7:52 pmWithout fear and lies, the reichwingers have nothing people will buy.
August 28th, 2007 at 7:53 pmUncle Ho, I'm hoping you're kidding, but even if you are, I don't appreciate the joke. No sane person wants a nuclear bomb to explode anywhere in the world. Bush and his cronies deserve jail time, not incineration.
August 28th, 2007 at 8:03 pmBush is right, we can't ignore the Iranian threat. All sensible Americans know this!
August 28th, 2007 at 8:04 pmAce [#113]
Ahmadinejad was "installed" by Israel? Wow.
It will take a nuclear detonation in Europe, Israel or the US before you gloids wake the F up.
August 28th, 2007 at 8:06 pmI agree Col. Jack...if there are any mushroom clouds released over the whitehouse...let's hope they are the result of a cooking accident.
August 28th, 2007 at 8:07 pmNotice the hypocricy from the Left.
On the one hand, they blame Bush for not stopping 9-1-1, and on the other hand, they do not want to stop future terrorist attacks!
Typical liberals, self-defeatocRATS!!!
August 28th, 2007 at 8:09 pm132>
Kind of like Bush going after bin Laden via Iraq?
August 28th, 2007 at 8:12 pmBush is right, we can’t ignore the Iranian threat. All sensible Americans know this!
Comment by Mr. President — August 28, 2007 @ 8:04 pm
Bush's little bellicose empty threat just boosted the power and control of the mullahs...to the detriment of ther moderate Iranian majority.
August 28th, 2007 at 8:13 pmDon't bother trying to engage Mr. President/Mr Pee in a rational discussion. He's just trolling for attention.
August 28th, 2007 at 8:15 pm#
Ace [#113]
Ahmadinejad was “installed†by Israel? Wow.
It will take a nuclear detonation in Europe, Israel or the US before you gloids wake the F up.
Comment by Toliver — August 28, 2007 @ 8:06 pm
I didn't state that he WAS. I asked everyone here to keep an exceptionally open mind to every possibility. Rule out nothing.
August 28th, 2007 at 8:17 pmCol; you're right. Bush/Cheney deserve to be guillotined. OFF WITH THEIR HEADS!!!!
August 28th, 2007 at 8:17 pmI didn’t state that he WAS. I asked everyone here to keep an exceptionally open mind to every possibility. Rule out nothing.
Comment by ace — August 28, 2007 @ 8:17 pm
Ace, you're such a fukcing idiot.
August 28th, 2007 at 8:19 pmahhhhh, mr p is pissing INTO the wind-again.
August 28th, 2007 at 8:19 pmSo why didn't anyone quiz Chimpy about the evidence that most of the 'Al Qaeda in Iraq' are financed, armed and from Saudi Arabia?
Oh yeah, forgot - 'so-called-librul-media'.
August 28th, 2007 at 8:19 pmBush’s little bellicose empty threat just boosted the power and control of the mullahs…to the detriment of ther moderate Iranian majority.
Comment by Badger — August 28, 2007 @ 8:13 pm
Oh, "empty threat" you say...
I think not. Maybe you should join your Muslim buddies in Iran and find out!!!
August 28th, 2007 at 8:20 pmIt also seems churlish of Chimpy to omit that the CIA is funding Sunni extremists who are carrying out a bombing campaign inside Iraq....
Google MEK Iran CIA and daily telegraph
August 28th, 2007 at 8:21 pmComment by TerrytheTurtle — August 28, 2007 @ 8:19 pm
Hey Fukc-head,
Those Saudis were exiles! The other Saudis are our friends!
You sir, are a racist!
August 28th, 2007 at 8:21 pmComment by Fools on the Hill — August 28, 2007 @ 8:12 pm
Bush is going after OBL in Afganistan and Pakistan, you liberal.
August 28th, 2007 at 8:22 pmRacist? Hahaha.
SUCK ME like a Republican Senator would Mr P#ss.
August 28th, 2007 at 8:24 pmOh, “empty threat†you say…
I think not.
Comment by Mr. President — August 28, 2007 @ 8:20 pm
That's exactly what the Mullahs are telling their people, in order to get them to give up their freedoms. Sound familiar??
August 28th, 2007 at 8:25 pmMr. Pee sez:
Sure he is. Let us know when bin Laden is found.
Funny, how a guy in terminal renal failure has managed to hide in caves and outwit the most advanced military in the world for over six years...
August 28th, 2007 at 8:26 pmProve me wrong or f*** off c**t
August 28th, 2007 at 8:26 pmLet us know when bin Laden is found. - Lefty
Okay.
August 28th, 2007 at 8:26 pmComment by TerrytheTurtle — August 28, 2007 @ 8:24 pm
WTF are you talking about?
August 28th, 2007 at 8:27 pmAhmadinijad was installed by the Iranian people in a democratic election because he ran on an anti-corruption platform. See, those "moderates" we like to talk about belong to the business elite, and they're big into crony capitalism. Ahmadinijad tapped into popular disgust with the insider cronyism and got elected by a plurality.
And for all his bluster, for all his dangerous statements, for all the less dangerous statements deliberately mistranslated to make them look dangerous, he means nothing. Because the President of Iran is effectively the interior minister. He has little power over the military and isn't even commander-in-chief. That falls to the Supreme Jurisprudent. Ahmadinijad couldn't launch a nuke at anyone were that his sincerest wish and he had whole bunkers of them. But he's a convenient patsy for the warmongers here and in Tel Aviv, because he's a fiery pseudo-populist with a penchant for saying inflammatory things, and saying things that can be twisted to look even worse.
August 28th, 2007 at 8:29 pmit will never end with this President. He will be preaching this stuff for the rest of his life.
Comment by John
Actually ex-presidents have traditionally stepped into the background and let the winner of future elections enact their policy without ex-pres carping. Carter has been the clearest and most embarrassing example of a president not following this tradition.
Let’s not criticize Bush for his possible future actions if we’re not going to criticize Carter for what he’s already done.
Comment by r — August 28, 2007 @ 7:01 pm
Actually, I PRAISE Carter, for he sees the dangers to the country and the world and needs to speak up.
That is courage personified!
Comment by upside00 — August 28, 2007 @ 7:03 pm
The point I was contesting was â€it will never end with this Presidentâ€
If it’s ok for Carter, it’s ok for Bush.
r
Refresh my memory, r…how many wars did Carter start?
Comment by TripMaster Monkey — August 28, 2007 @ 7:04 pm
Out of context.
r
Carter is an American citizen and a patriot. he is also 100% correct in his criticisms of the jerkoff-in-thief. custom was fine while we had competent, legally-elected presidents working for the county’s good in some way. Bush has brough criticisms from ex-presidents, including hsi father, on himself. You want North Korea, if you want free speech done away with.
Comment by ronjazz — August 28, 2007 @ 7:07 pm
Then you agree. If it’s ok for Carter to preach, John should shut up about the possibility that Bush MIGHT.
r
Stop already with the attempts at deflection. This has nothing to do with any other president. This guy’s dismal record and ridiculous statements will be an albatross around his neck and a black mark on the republic party for years, if not decades.
And the fact is shrub *will* go to his grave preaching paranoia about the dangers of saddam that he averted and the evils of democrats and how they turned the country/world against him–like the crazy great-grandfather debilitated by alzheimers screaming incoherently at passersby and publicly urinating yet again on the neighbor’s lawn.
Comment by mongo — August 28, 2007 @ 7:12 pm
Um, you’ve added nothing. You don’t criticize Carter – the preacher, so don’t criticize Bush who, according to you *will* preach, Crystal Ball mongo.
r
Tradition? FDR died. Truman, maybe. Eisenhower, probably, although he left with a bang. Kennedy, um, dead. LBJ, left in a huff. Nixon, left in disgrace but made attempts at comebacks over the years. Ford, uh, who knows? Carter, some of us believe has been terrific. Reagan, left gaga. GHWB, certainly has made his presence known. Bill Clinton, he’s been polite. . . .
What is this tradition of which you speak? Something from the 19th century?
Comment by gummitch — August 28, 2007 @ 7:18 pm
GHWB, certainly has made his presence known. Bill Clinton, he’s been polite. .
I’ve seen them together on the same stage for tsunami relief, but you say GHWB is making his presence known and Clinton is being polite. Shill.
Google “tradition of former presidents not criticizing†There’s over a million hits. I won’t post them all here.
r
r: “Actually ex-presidents have traditionally stepped into the background and let the winner of future elections enact their policy without ex-pres carping.â€
Your conservative media propagandists have been lying to you again and you’re evidently too lazy to crack open a history book to find out for yourself. Herbert Hoover spent years traveling the country telling anyone who would listen that FDR was going to ruin the country with his New Deal. He even wrote and aggressively marketing a book on the subject. George HW Bush criticized Clinton’s tax policy in 1994. Some of our earliest presidents spent years namecalling presidents who came after them. The right wing has invented this false history you have bought into with Carter in mind.
Comment by Ret. Col. Jack Ripper — August 28, 2007 @ 7:44 pm
Thanks Jack, you agree, Tom should shut up and let Bush say what he wants.
You all can’t have it both ways – except on this site.
August 28th, 2007 at 8:29 pmDon't feed the trolls...they are morons.
August 28th, 2007 at 8:30 pmit will never end with this President. He will be preaching this stuff for the rest of his life.
Comment by John
Actually ex-presidents have traditionally stepped into the background and let the winner of future elections enact their policy without ex-pres carping. Carter has been the clearest and most embarrassing example of a president not following this tradition.
Let’s not criticize Bush for his possible future actions if we’re not going to criticize Carter for what he’s already done.
Comment by r — August 28, 2007 @ 7:01 pm
Actually, I PRAISE Carter, for he sees the dangers to the country and the world and needs to speak up.
That is courage personified!
Comment by upside00 — August 28, 2007 @ 7:03 pm
The point I was contesting was â€it will never end with this Presidentâ€
If it’s ok for Carter, it’s ok for Bush.
r
Refresh my memory, r…how many wars did Carter start?
Comment by TripMaster Monkey — August 28, 2007 @ 7:04 pm
Out of context.
r
Carter is an American citizen and a patriot. he is also 100% correct in his criticisms of the jerkoff-in-thief. custom was fine while we had competent, legally-elected presidents working for the county’s good in some way. Bush has brough criticisms from ex-presidents, including hsi father, on himself. You want North Korea, if you want free speech done away with.
Comment by ronjazz — August 28, 2007 @ 7:07 pm
Then you agree. If it’s ok for Carter to preach, John should shut up about the possibility that Bush MIGHT.
r
Stop already with the attempts at deflection. This has nothing to do with any other president. This guy’s dismal record and ridiculous statements will be an albatross around his neck and a black mark on the republic party for years, if not decades.
And the fact is shrub *will* go to his grave preaching paranoia about the dangers of saddam that he averted and the evils of democrats and how they turned the country/world against him–like the crazy great-grandfather debilitated by alzheimers screaming incoherently at passersby and publicly urinating yet again on the neighbor’s lawn.
Comment by mongo — August 28, 2007 @ 7:12 pm
Um, you’ve added nothing. You don’t criticize Carter – the preacher, so don’t criticize Bush who, according to you *will* preach, Crystal Ball mongo.
r
Tradition? FDR died. Truman, maybe. Eisenhower, probably, although he left with a bang. Kennedy, um, dead. LBJ, left in a huff. Nixon, left in disgrace but made attempts at comebacks over the years. Ford, uh, who knows? Carter, some of us believe has been terrific. Reagan, left gaga. GHWB, certainly has made his presence known. Bill Clinton, he’s been polite. . . .
What is this tradition of which you speak? Something from the 19th century?
Comment by gummitch — August 28, 2007 @ 7:18 pm
GHWB, certainly has made his presence known. Bill Clinton, he’s been polite. .
I’ve seen them together on the same stage for tsunami relief, but you say GHWB is making his presence known and Clinton is being polite. Shill.
Google “tradition of former presidents not criticizing†There’s over a million hits. I won’t post them all here.
r
r: “Actually ex-presidents have traditionally stepped into the background and let the winner of future elections enact their policy without ex-pres carping.â€
Your conservative media propagandists have been lying to you again and you’re evidently too lazy to crack open a history book to find out for yourself. Herbert Hoover spent years traveling the country telling anyone who would listen that FDR was going to ruin the country with his New Deal. He even wrote and aggressively marketing a book on the subject. George HW Bush criticized Clinton’s tax policy in 1994. Some of our earliest presidents spent years namecalling presidents who came after them. The right wing has invented this false history you have bought into with Carter in mind.
Comment by Ret. Col. Jack Ripper — August 28, 2007 @ 7:44 pm
Thanks Jack, you agree, Tom should shut up and let Bush say what he wants.
You all can’t have it both ways – except on this site.
Comment by r — August 28, 2007 @ 8:29 pm
-----
That's right, r. The libs want to have their cake and eat it too.
August 28th, 2007 at 8:31 pmMr P#ssant fails to note that Chimpy was supposedly quoted as saying 'is that all?' when told how many CIA assets were still hunting OBL. The CIA men quietly pointed out that all the focus was on Iraq.... oops, Chimpy.
August 28th, 2007 at 8:31 pmComment by TerrytheTurtle — August 28, 2007 @ 8:31 pm
Not at all.
August 28th, 2007 at 8:33 pmr sez:
"Out of context"? That doesn't even make sense.
Answer the question, jackass.
August 28th, 2007 at 8:33 pmGet ready folks. We are being led to an armeggedon by this mad man.
August 28th, 2007 at 8:34 pmJimmah Carter is punk a$$ little b!tch!!!
August 28th, 2007 at 8:34 pmPeter W is right. The Mullahs can veto anything and everything they want...Ahmedinijad lost badly in the last elections, mostly because he didn't deliver on his promises for a better life for the average Iranian.
August 28th, 2007 at 8:36 pmIran has an address. To think they would launch a nuclear attack on a superpower is ludicrous. To think they want nukes for deterrence makes sense....especially with Bush making comments on the world stage.
Mr. President the Honorless Coward is punk a$$ little b!tch!!!
Comment by Mr. President
Fixed it for you.
August 28th, 2007 at 8:37 pmI think not. Maybe you should join your Muslim buddies in Iran and find out!!!
Comment by Mr. President — August 28, 2007 @ 8:20 pm
Nice to see that haven't changed since I've been away. Mr. Piss in his pants is still spewing shit.
August 28th, 2007 at 8:39 pmSo Mr. Pee,
We should bomb Iran then?
August 28th, 2007 at 8:41 pmMust....not....feed....trolls....
August 28th, 2007 at 8:41 pmJimmy Carter grows peanuts, and has a brother who drinks beer.
August 28th, 2007 at 8:46 pmComment by ForTruth — August 28, 2007 @ 8:41 pm
IslamoFascism
August 28th, 2007 at 8:49 pmBush you are a monumental travesty.
August 28th, 2007 at 8:50 pmAnd you don't even seem to know it.
We haven't been buying your BS for years now... since you ignored OBL and invaded Iraq. Haven't you noticed? Oh, yeah... everyone who'd tell you has either been fired, or is kept in the free speech zones.
I kinda like IslamoStalinist myself Mr. Peewee.
August 28th, 2007 at 8:56 pmNo one is listening to our little woodenhead illegitimate president Pinocchio. I hope that ll the generals have enough sense and courage to ignore any orders that would attack Iran. Hold on for a few more weeks and the ass-wipe that is Dubya will be gone - impeached or resigned.
DEFINITION - "asswipe" - That material we use to wipe shit from our ass.
August 28th, 2007 at 8:56 pmNot at all.
Comment by Mr. Pi**ant — August 28, 2007 @ 8:33 pm
oops - shall I call the firebrigade now, and I have a pair of George W Bush boxers I can send you to replace the pants currently on fire - slightly soiled of course?
Still waiting for me to prove I am either a) racist but more importantly b) that the Busheviks are not funding anti-Iranian terrorist groups or that most of the Iraqi foreign insurgents are Saudi.
Not holding my breath, Mr P*ssant
August 28th, 2007 at 8:58 pm28%ers = bottom feeding, knuckle dragging, troglodytes.
August 28th, 2007 at 8:59 pmFool me once . . . .
August 28th, 2007 at 8:59 pmCaption Contest:
Chimpy: "Well what can you expect - I was coked up during Geography? Iran, Iraq, what's the f***ing difference?"
August 28th, 2007 at 9:00 pmDubya will put a firecracker in your ass a blow you up if you don't get scared at what he says....or he may throw a temper tantrum.
August 28th, 2007 at 9:00 pmYou Leftists support the Iranian regime.
August 28th, 2007 at 9:01 pmIf they get a Nuke they will nuke Israel
Given that today's American Left is allied with Neo-Nazis like ace I'm sure you'd enjoy seeing 8 Million Israelis insinerated.
Even if Israel hit Iran back, Iran wins!
The ideology the the Iranian regime has is called 12therism.
They belive that if they cause a massive war, the Mahdi (12th Iman) will return and created an Islamic one world government.
Al-Qaeda also has a variant of this belief.
Of course now the Pro-Iran supporters will unleash on me now!
August 28th, 2007 at 9:03 pmI guess Iran is the new Cuba, the Left's idea of paradise!
Comment by Humpty — August 28, 2007 @ 9:01 pm
Are you on drugs? Israel has a stronger military the the USA, snce Dubya ruined ours.
August 28th, 2007 at 9:03 pmWhat up, Mr. HumptY Hump!?!?!?!
August 28th, 2007 at 9:05 pmkasinca,
August 28th, 2007 at 9:05 pmThat's why Iran will nuke Israel.
They can't win conventionally so they're willing to lose 1/2 of their population to exterminate Israel.
Israel is a one bomb stae.
It's the ideology of the Ayatollahs.
Research it!
G "W"...the most DANGEROUS man in the WORLLLLLD!...commit him NOW!
August 28th, 2007 at 9:05 pmMr P,
August 28th, 2007 at 9:06 pmWhat's the deal Nigga!
What's popping?
I just got back from class.
I learned a little about the most successful empire ever, the Roman Empire.
It didn't fall until WWI with the Hapsburgs.
These leftists will probably say that is a lie though!!!
August 28th, 2007 at 9:07 pmMr P,
August 28th, 2007 at 9:07 pmThe Islamo-Stalinists are now gonna unleash a hate barrage on me for attacking their Islamo-Fascist allies!
You git my back right, Dog?
Mr. President ,
August 28th, 2007 at 9:08 pmYes the Leftists will say you lie.
After all they said Italians aren't Latin but Anglo-Saxon!
You git my back right, Dog?
Comment by Humpty — August 28, 2007 @ 9:07 pm
You damn right, let's roll!
August 28th, 2007 at 9:08 pmCool, bring it DemoKKKrats!
August 28th, 2007 at 9:11 pm#
You git my back right, Dog?
Comment by Humpty — August 28, 2007 @ 9:07 pm
You damn right, let’s roll!
Comment by Mr. President — August 28, 2007 @ 9:08 pm
When you say "roll" you mean bounce up on down on each others laps, right?
August 28th, 2007 at 9:12 pmOh... and it wasn't Islam that took control of the Western Holy Roman Empire, it was Christians.
The pathetic savages didn't stand a chance once the Romans (in Byzantium) and the Latins (in Italy and France) struck back!!!
The Muslims only got Syria and other sandy lands!!!
August 28th, 2007 at 9:12 pmmy guess would be "humpty" is on Pee's lap, feelin' the warmth.
that right, humpty?
August 28th, 2007 at 9:13 pmDear Mr. Satan,
PLEASE take your spawn, George W. Bush, back HOME with you.
He has done ALL the EVIL, LYING and GENOCIDE that you wanted him to do.
We people of God KNOW that he is YOUR boy, and that he BELONGS with you.
And if you want to smash his face in every minute for ETERNITY, have at it. His EVIL is YOUR evil...
August 28th, 2007 at 9:14 pmComment by Humpty — August 28, 2007 @ 9:01 pm
Comment by Humpty — August 28, 2007 @ 9:05 pm
Well f*ckwit, that was fun. Do you drool on yourself all day or just in the evenings?
(1) The same crap was said about the Soviets - did they drop one? Er no.
(2) How is Iran going to launch a nuke to Israel? That's hard stuff, but then facts are hard and so is your head.
(3) Israel is a 'one-bomb state'? Run out of fingers there skippy? Current estimates are 300 with several means of delivery. Guess who the Iranians are really scared of?
What a maroon. George W? Is that you?
August 28th, 2007 at 9:15 pmWhy is President Bush OK with letting us live under the shadow of a nuclear holocaust from North Korea, which actually has nukes? Why is he letting the "world's worst leaders to threaten us with the world's worst weapons"?
August 28th, 2007 at 9:15 pmI learned a little about the most successful empire ever, the Roman Empire.
It didn’t fall until WWI with the Hapsburgs.
These leftists will probably say that is a lie though!!!
Comment by Mr. President — August 28, 2007 @ 9:07 pm
Too much Da Vinci Code rots your brain. Here's the proof. ROTFLMAO.
August 28th, 2007 at 9:17 pmComment by croatoan — August 28, 2007 @ 9:15 pm
What about the Indians, let off a nuke outside the NPT, fought three wars against a US ally..... my god, they are bad dudes.....? Oh wait Chimpy says they are OK. Man I'm confused, I wish I knew which brown people I'm supposed to hate.....
August 28th, 2007 at 9:20 pmWhat he really said...
"Get your fear here, special on fear. The new Fall 2007 Fear is for sale, buy now, buy now! Only 4 easy Chinese debt payments for a lifetime of fear, we'll even throw in a tax cut if you are wealthy, Fear here...get your fear"
August 28th, 2007 at 9:23 pmWe are teaching the world that if you do NOT have nuclear weapons, then you are taking a chance on being invaded by the US. If you Have nuclear weapons, then you are safe.
Therefore, Iran's response is very logical.
August 28th, 2007 at 9:29 pmComment by Keith — August 28, 2007 @ 9:29 pm
Keith nails it.
August 28th, 2007 at 9:30 pmComment by croatoan — August 28, 2007 @ 9:15 pm
Easy - North Korea has no oil or natural gas resources and has a bigger army than our borken one.
August 28th, 2007 at 9:33 pmEveryone, take a good look at Bush's eyes. Black as coal. Black slits. The Decider must be on some powerful stuff. What drug would turn someones entire eye black like that? It really gives me the creeps looking at his eyes. I've never seen anyone with eyes like that before.
August 28th, 2007 at 9:36 pmComment by OxyCon — August 28, 2007 @ 9:36 pm
Now that Gonzo's gone, he's alone in the bunker with Condi 'Eva' Rice.
As someone smarter than me said: "Danger, Will Robinson"
August 28th, 2007 at 9:42 pmStop this nonsense where it starts.
It starts with AIPAC, Jack Grynberg, et al. Jack heads up AIPAC, believes christians are his toolies, and that America is the solution to the Arab-Israeli crisis. Unfortunatly for Jack, Saudi Arabia is hardly the worst enemy facing Israel, and throwing hundreds of millions of dollars at the problem won't solve it.
AIPAC is the largest political organization supporting Israel. Ask Joe Lieberman. The interests of AIPAC are not those of American citizens. . . . and yet AIPAC continues to control American policy in the middle east. AIPCA supports policies that demean middle eastern citizens, whether they are Lebanese, Palestinian or Scott.
Why pick out Jack Grynberg? Because he's the leader of the Isreali cause. Because he gives more money than anyone else. Because he's the anonymous backer of policies that lead America to stray into wars and unrest where American politicians fear to tread (without anonymity).
Where an American is spending millions of dollars without any recognition to instill hatred, Americans need to know.
Journalists should follow the money. Follow the Jack Grynberg trail.
August 28th, 2007 at 9:45 pmSorry for being long-winded. . . . point being . . . don't just complain . . . certain individuals are promoting these mad-dog strategies . . . those individuals have money and an agenda . . . their agenda is not that of America. Our soldiers, God bless every one of them, are not fighting for America, they are fighting for a shadow agenda. Shine the light on the agenda. Shine the light on the forces promoting the shadow agenda. If you know of one, shine the light on that person or interest.
If Americans are going to fight a war, let it be for reasons that we all see clearly and understand.
August 28th, 2007 at 9:57 pmfear-mongering Bush?!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
are you Liberals serious? fear mongering Bush?!
hahahaha!!!
As always, Liberals condemn Conservatives for what Liberals always do.
I guess Al Gore and the Global WArming lunatics don't use fear mongering to get people terrified about Global Warming and to support Al Gore's Global Warming lies.
Only Liberals are this big of a hypocrites.
August 28th, 2007 at 10:03 pmFear Bush -
If Bush were truly a shrub, we could just give him the pine-beetle disease, write him a love letter and torch the son-of-a-bug . . . unfortunately, Cheney is contagious . . . it's cryptonite . . . only Michael Vick can kill it.
August 28th, 2007 at 10:19 pmIsrael has up to 500 nukes, can put nukes on subs directly off Iran, and destroy the country in minutes. Does Iran have to be defenseless? Iraq was defenseless. Look what happened to them.
Everyone opposed to the Iraq invasion said Iran would gain power in Iraq. They were right.
The critics said the invasion would open up Iraq to terrorists. They were right. This was very predictable.
August 28th, 2007 at 10:21 pmSeed-less - you're not a grape, you
re a raisen.
Please, please, provide examples of Dems fear-mongering.
Let us see . . . impromptu press conference from Russia . . . stop all proceedings . . . America has arrested an "American Al Quaeda". Bad news was, the dood was arrested six months earlier . . . but stop the clocks .. Pootie can wait! We've got headline news."
Barf me a hair ball - - Berk Breathed, where are you? :>)
August 28th, 2007 at 10:25 pmIf you want to see Iran press reports, the old brit's got an interesting post up.
August 28th, 2007 at 10:30 pmDidn’t we also have “good evidence†of WMD’s in Iraq??
Comment by Francois — August 28, 2007 @ 6:03 pm
no - you're confusing 'evidence' with 'intelligence' - they had good 'intelligence' that there were wmd's in iraq
August 28th, 2007 at 10:34 pmipod sez:
No, ipod, they didn't. Three words: Downing Street Memo.
August 28th, 2007 at 10:38 pmJimmah Carter is punk a$$ little b!tch!!!
Comment by Mr. President — August 28, 2007 @ 8:34 pm
Is that you MA/VV?
August 28th, 2007 at 10:42 pmI believed the hundreds of nuclear weapons inspectors on the ground in Iraq in late 2002 and early 2003. They said "nothing there".
August 28th, 2007 at 10:43 pmMembers of the VFW and unAmerican Legion...
...who embraced and applauded the TREASONOUS COWARD Bushiva's propaganda...
...are about the lowest, dumbest form of dogsh*t on the planet...
...the deserter-in-chief USES their fickle, feeble as*es...
...and they smile, applaud, and take pictures...
...they're ALL inbred al Cracker (and al Cracker wannabe) corksuckers in my book...
August 28th, 2007 at 10:54 pmThe biggest threat of nuclear war and holocaust are the neocon American power mongers who believe we should destroy the world (and that includes Israel) to save it. As long as half the Democratic party excuses this crap as governance, we are in terrible danger--from our own "leadership." I use the term extremely loosely.
August 28th, 2007 at 10:59 pmi could deal with bush's ignorance and stupidity, but his insanity has me very concerned.
August 28th, 2007 at 11:02 pmtr sez:
I've said it before, and I'll say it again. Someone in this administration either sincerely believes they are the AntiChrist, or are trying their level best to convince others that they are. These jokers are reading the book of Revelation like an instruction manual.
August 28th, 2007 at 11:11 pmIt boggles my mind that the imbecile in chief is still trying to wave his magic wand and have boogiemen fly out of his ass.
There are economic sanctions, that, if properly applied along with Russian and Chinese pressure and persuasion could ensure that only power generating nuclear activity occurs.
There is no scenario where the US needs to take military action.
August 28th, 2007 at 11:21 pmIf I were Russian or Chinese I'd be more worried about Israel nuking Iran than anything else.
You know, we're supposed to be the greatest nation in the world and I wish we'd start acting like it.
Like Hitler, Bush must not be allowed to invade Iran. I think we have more than enough data to remove him from office based on his mental health.
August 28th, 2007 at 11:35 pmThe situation with the USA, is that we are reeling from this administration as it is. Stress has been administered to our society over the wars, deaths, 9-11, fuel prices, mortgage and cutting funding for education. The cost of this war is pricely in more ways than one. Fear being put on Americans, for lack of privacy getting phones tapped. Where is our freedom for what we want as Americans? We are the people. We lost our rights to determine who comes into our country too. God wanted peace on this earth, this planet we all reside upon. Our environment needs immediate attention. Something so precious like water is in despair. People scattered out from Katrina due to lack of planning and care are still being ignored when this country has resources to get them out of the hell they have been put through. Have we become a third world country?
August 28th, 2007 at 11:47 pmCaption Contest:
Chimpy: "Some days I get so wound up about Iran, I wish I'd not stopped doing dope"
August 28th, 2007 at 11:56 pmSo the moonbats plan for the mullahs and nukes would be?
August 28th, 2007 at 11:57 pmSo the moonbats plan for the mullahs and nukes would be?
Comment by Frank J — August 28, 2007 @ 11:57 pm
Try not to let Dubya set off any Nukes will be our first order of business.
August 28th, 2007 at 11:59 pmThat's it? Why am I not surprised.
August 29th, 2007 at 12:09 amAdmittedly the dataset relative to nations which have actually utilized nuclear weapons on the battlefield is small there seems to be a strong correlation with the absurdity of such weapons especially when their use is considered reasonable in the interest of preventing a preceived "other" from buying, borrowing, building the same toys while claiming the same "legitimate" justifications for why they desire to obtain them. Kind of Hakauna Mata (sp) type shit
August 29th, 2007 at 12:17 ami noticed that the chimp is now lumping iran together with al-qaeda in the same sentence - he said that the way to keeping these two in check is to win the war in iraq - i think he's pretty much spelled out what his intentions are - just a matter of time before it will be raining bombs over tehran
August 29th, 2007 at 12:24 amCaption Contest:"und der new tausend jahr reich will reign once more!"
August 29th, 2007 at 12:24 amCaption Contest; "hey....the little words stopped scrolling"
August 29th, 2007 at 12:25 amThe Bushites are raving mad! They learned that after the 911 psyops NO second 911 is necessary!
Now they know how impotent the US public and the UN really is. They can start any war at will.
Another 911 is simply not needed and it is far too damaging for the precarious industry and trade.
The keynsian money-printing for arms and equipment is already ongoing, no kick-start needed.
The USA has been a fascist country for over a hundred years,
911 was the joker in the continuation of the necessary illusions, one can't play that card very often.
The bloated military / CIA / "military intel" is not an unstoppable beast, it is fueled by bankers' money-creation madeness and that fuel will run out.
Democracy is a powerful thingie. The power is taken away from the wallet by the ballot. (Yes, I watched SiCKO again! Way cool.)
To keep the ballot down, the wallet uses PROPAGANDA to organize chaos (published 1928)
But.. might the lunatic ENVANGELICALS be happy about a
August 29th, 2007 at 12:30 amFinal, cataclysmic Third World War???
"Oh Christ, the most recent NIE said they would not be nuke ready until between 2010 and 2015. And for chrissakes, this is gonna be a self-fulfilling prophecy, as hard as Bush pushes this shit. They wouldn’t even have an extremist like Ahmadinejad had Bush not given his Axis of Evil speech. What kind of a dipshit is this man. Uggh.
Comment by TC — August 28, 2007 @ 5:40 pm"
What a complete load of crap. Obviously you weren't around when extremist Ayatollah Khomeini took our people hostage back in the 1970's and held them for over a year.
There wouldn't be an extremist running Iran now if "Jimmah" Carter had taken care of business and laid waste to Iran 30 years ago.
You libs are either all too young to understand history, or are too stupid to understand history. There can be no other explanation.
August 29th, 2007 at 12:45 am"Members of the VFW and unAmerican Legion…
…who embraced and applauded the TREASONOUS COWARD Bushiva’s propaganda…
…are about the lowest, dumbest form of dogsh*t on the planet…
…the deserter-in-chief USES their fickle, feeble as*es…
…and they smile, applaud, and take pictures…
…they’re ALL inbred al Cracker (and al Cracker wannabe) corksuckers in my book…
Comment by big papa — August 28, 2007 @ 10:54 pm"
Why do liberals hate the military?
August 29th, 2007 at 12:50 am"Israel has up to 500 nukes, can put nukes on subs directly off Iran, and destroy the country in minutes. Does Iran have to be defenseless? Iraq was defenseless. Look what happened to them.
Everyone opposed to the Iraq invasion said Iran would gain power in Iraq. They were right.
The critics said the invasion would open up Iraq to terrorists. They were right. This was very predictable.
Comment by Keith — August 28, 2007 @ 10:21 pm"
And it may just be Israel that carries the water on this one. They've been getting pecked for decades, and I think they are about fed up with it. When Iran's prez, "Hitler Jr." speaks, the Jews have all heard it before.
And now they are in a position to actually do something about it.
Israel has more to fear from Iran than we in the U.S. do, so if Israel ends up being the ones to take out Iran, there will be far less world outrage.
August 29th, 2007 at 12:58 amIsrael has more to fear from Iran than we in the U.S. do, so if Israel ends up being the ones to take out Iran, there will be far less world outrage.
Comment by O. Bigfoot — August 29, 2007 @ 12:58 am
Should Russia "take out" Chechnya? China Taiwan? ETA the Basque lands? Mexico the Southwest and in time more? When is it right? When wrong?
August 29th, 2007 at 1:07 amComment by dbadassr — August 29, 2007 @ 1:07 am
there's no r in dbadass
August 29th, 2007 at 1:16 amNuculer?
August 29th, 2007 at 1:42 amO Bigfoot, were you around when Reagan, GHWBush, North, and Casey had the plan to sell massive amounts of weaponry to Iran if they kept the hostages until Reagan was inaguarated?
August 29th, 2007 at 2:07 amSince the invasion of Iraq resulted in Iran and al Qaeda coming into the country and greatly increasing their power------------------wasn't it a stupid thing to do?
August 29th, 2007 at 2:09 amEspecially since we have lost 3730 troops, it will cost us $2.2 Trillion, and it has made us less secure?
August 29th, 2007 at 2:10 amBush's favorite weapon: fear-mongering
August 29th, 2007 at 2:36 amhttp://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/25/world/middleeast/25detain.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
“Interestingly, we’ve found that the vast majority are not inspired by jihad or hate for the coalition or Iraqi government — the vast majority are inspired by money,†said Capt. John Fleming of the Navy, a spokesman for the multinational forces’ detainee operations. The men are paid by insurgent leaders. “The primary motivator is economic — they’re angry men because they don’t have jobs,†he said.
Iranians? Don't believe it. On the positive side, if the US opened a few more McDonalds and Wal Marts in Iraq.... everyone would have at least a McJob.... come on Ronald McDonald, your country needs you!
Look at Juan Cole's graph of the Times' numbers:
http://www.juancole.com/2007/08/who-is-us-fighting-in-iraq.html
August 29th, 2007 at 7:07 amAnd it may just be Israel that carries the water on this one. They’ve been getting pecked for decades, and I think they are about fed up with it. When Iran’s prez, “Hitler Jr.†speaks, the Jews have all heard it before.
Comment by O. Bigfoot — August 29, 2007 @ 12:58 am
If Ahmedinejad really wanted to exterminate Jews, why hasn't he started with the 25,000 that live in Iran?
August 29th, 2007 at 7:38 amThen Talk to them Mr Bush ,, talk
August 29th, 2007 at 7:40 amstop using the media ...talk to the Iranians
August 29th, 2007 at 7:40 amBush is out of his mind-this man will take us from America to
August 29th, 2007 at 8:27 ama burned out piece of dirt. Considering war with Iran is the last thing
we want to do as a nation. China and Russia will not have us attack Iran, they have been doing joined military exercises for the past few months. Personally I think Bush and Cheney are on crystal met or they want to be the new Nazi America. If he does attack Iran, I hope there is a God to help us
There wouldn’t be an extremist running Iran now if “Jimmah†Carter had taken care of business and laid waste to Iran 30 years ago.
You libs are either all too young to understand history, or are too stupid to understand history. There can be no other explanation.
Comment by O. Bigfoot — August 29, 2007 @ 12:45 am
And there wouldn't be an extremist running Iran now if the US had minded its OWN business and left the democratically-elected leader of Iran in power 50 years ago. Instead, we overthrew the government so British Petroleum could retain control of Iran's oilfields, and put a despotic Shah in power.
We liberals understand history. We also understand the danger of SELECTIVE history.
August 29th, 2007 at 8:38 amOk, sing along with me,
August 29th, 2007 at 10:04 amAll He Is Saying,
Is Give War A Chance!
Impeach Bush and Cheney and Save the Constitution!
There wouldn’t be an extremist running Iran now if “Jimmah†Carter had taken care of business and laid waste to Iran 30 years ago.
You libs are either all too young to understand history, or are too stupid to understand history. There can be no other explanation.
Comment by O. Bigfoot — August 29, 2007 @ 12:45 am
And you, of course, don't consider the deposed remist? He was just like f'ing Saddam; took from the poor, had his enemies "disappear" and ran the country like a Fiefdom!
Might want to do a little more research before making your claims.
August 29th, 2007 at 11:17 amCivilization cannot survive another 16 months of Bush/Cheney!
August 29th, 2007 at 12:27 pmThe US infastructure is falling apart. The administration should stop destroying and rebuilding other places with OUR money and take care of US.
August 29th, 2007 at 3:56 pmThe globalization of our economy has left this country for sale to the highest bidder and the slezziest producers of tainted and inferior products.
The standard of American life continues to decline because WE THE PEOPLE allow it. Lazy as Americans are, it's only a matter of time before we, as a country, fall completely.
Before the Iraq War, Bush said Iraq was a threat to America.
The reverse was true....... America attacked Iraq; Iraq didn't attack America.
Before the Iran War, Bush is saying Iran is a threat to America.
The reverse is true............
August 29th, 2007 at 7:30 pmI'm Iranian and I think the best evidence showing that Iran is making nuclear bomb is this one:
Iran's nuclear program for so called "peacefull purposes" has started 22 years ago, and the government has reported nothing to IAEA duing the first 18 years.
Here is the question: Why won't they tell the truth if they wanted to make nuclear energy for and only for "peaceful purposes" ?
August 29th, 2007 at 10:29 pm