Dude Bigtwat spend some time teaching that ant colony you call a family how to change a tire or something else that has some practical use.
Using that limp pr1ck you call an intellect trying to make irrelevant points is taking away from valuable time you could be spending teaching your children to blindly follow thier leaders no matter how many lies they tell…

Does ANYONE believe that if the senators didnt vote for Petraeus that bush would go “oh gosh, well now I guess I better nominate someone whose fair and impartial this time….”? No he wouldnt.. he would nominate another “tow the line” nut who, like Petrius, won’t utter a single word of disagreement with the administration. Bush would just accuse the senators of obstructing the war by not giving him the officers he needs to do the job, and then nominate nut #36.

Bush listens to his generals all right….if they don’t say what he wants to hear, he replaces them…..then listens to the new ones..wash rinse repeat.
Started with Shinseki (??) and continuted from there. When Petri makes on statement where he shows some independence (i.e. disagreement with his masters) then I’ll start beleiving him…

81-0 vote for Petraeus is in contrast to criticism of Bush plan

Comment by O. Bigfoot #84

That’s right B(ush’s) Big Mouth(ful)…

…your criminal gods Bushiva and L’il Dick…

…were given ALL the rope they needed…

…with which to hang themselves…

…nobody’s buying your bullsh*t…

…’cuz had the Dems blocked Betraeus’ nomination…

…your talking point would’ve been…

…”Bushiva denied tools he needs to win the war”…

…now go finish raping your family members…

…in your basement sex torture chamber…

Uh huh; why would anyone have a complete lack of faith in the report, which for months the administration has touted will be written by Petreaus ALONE? Especially when you consider that in advance of the report, it was revealed last week that it will be written by senior adminstrative staff in THE WHITE HOUSE, and not by Petreaus; and let’s not forget who was in charge of dispensing millions of weapons to the fledgling Iraqi police and armed forces, when those same weapons mysteriously ‘disappeared,’ most likely into the hands of the insurgents.

You guessed it; General Petreaus.

And you honestly can’t understand why people are sceptical of this specious bullshit?

Wake up.

Comment by rdenbo — August 28, 2007 @ 1:21 pm”

No. Congress should get the hell out of the way and let General Petraeus do the job they sent him over there to do.

So they “withdrawl their support” after they give them the benefit of the doubt, but then they are observed in place as doing a terrible job except as crony for the President?

And???

Oh, I get it. The Democrats “Don’t support the troops”. That’s original… a stretch… and still wrong.

Awesome job of research!

You mean…the same way the FISA law was rammed through Congress by the use of the tool of fear?

With due respect to Gen. P, he is not calling the shots. There’s a direct line from 1600 in to his ear.

“We must denounce the Democrats for trying to run the war that only we have the right to run from the south lawn”.

81-0 vote for Petraeus is in contrast to criticism of Bush plan

WASHINGTON – The Senate on Friday voted unanimously to confirm the nomination of Army Lt. Gen. David Petraeus to command U.S. troops in Iraq at a time when President Bush is building up American forces there.

This is just another example of Democrats voting to send a soldier to do a job and then withdrawing their support as soon as they get there. You think any of the Democrats that voted for Petraeus will be held accountable for sending a “Bush lap dog” to Iraq. I think not.

Link to the vote.
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&session=1&vote=00033

I couldn’t have said it better myself…

http://groups.msn.com/bigdaddyscafe/general.msnw?action=get_message&mview=0&ID_Message=145646&LastModified=4675636720974682255

This discourse is as tired as the over-worn streets of Baghdad. The General was ___TOLD TO___ soften the report. Pure and simple.

I do not know what other codices of philososphy we can derive from stories relating to the 43rd white house’s abuse of executive power.

She told them that she would be soft on Homeland security!!!

Hil is a traitor to The UNITED STATES of AMERICA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Comment by katy — August 28, 2007 @ 11:08 am

—————–

Tobs will hopefully get his reverse lobotomy. His brain-damage is affecting not only him, but those around him as well.

Comment by hellinabucket — August 28, 2007 @ 12:07 pm

Good point. Somehow I doubt the Petraeus report will mention the cholera outbreak in northern Iraq.

Swifty!!!

Excellent.