<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: O&#8217;Hanlon Hopes Final GAO Report On Iraq Will Be &#8216;Improved&#8217; To Reflect WH Claims Of Progress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkprogress.org/2007/08/31/ohanlon-gao/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/08/31/ohanlon-gao/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:50:46 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sdfasdf</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/08/31/ohanlon-gao/comment-page-3/#comment-4055055</link>
		<dc:creator>sdfasdf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 19:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/08/31/ohanlon-gao/#comment-4055055</guid>
		<description>This Toilet-Paper hate-site is so virulent towards the US military, as based on its misuse of anti-US soldier &quot;news&quot; sources like MSNBC and its plan to disguise its hatred of the troops by blaming Bush. What TP did incorrectly, to begin with, is reference MSNBC for ANYTHING related to Iraq. TP must guiltily know that MSNBC is so anti-US soldiers that it employed military slanderer William Arkin who derogated US troops as mercenaries! How dare Toilet Paper abuse MSNBC as a source when MSNBC has been exposed time and time again for spreading hateful propaganda against the military. Secondly, TP misconceives the MSNBC article since Bush&#039;s surge is meant to stop only civilian attacks, which the article ADMITS are down. Bush or the US military can&#039;t well be held accountable for the uncivilized, beastly Shiites and Sunnis continuing to ethnically cleanse each other, can they? Of course not!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Toilet-Paper hate-site is so virulent towards the US military, as based on its misuse of anti-US soldier &#8220;news&#8221; sources like MSNBC and its plan to disguise its hatred of the troops by blaming Bush. What TP did incorrectly, to begin with, is reference MSNBC for ANYTHING related to Iraq. TP must guiltily know that MSNBC is so anti-US soldiers that it employed military slanderer William Arkin who derogated US troops as mercenaries! How dare Toilet Paper abuse MSNBC as a source when MSNBC has been exposed time and time again for spreading hateful propaganda against the military. Secondly, TP misconceives the MSNBC article since Bush&#8217;s surge is meant to stop only civilian attacks, which the article ADMITS are down. Bush or the US military can&#8217;t well be held accountable for the uncivilized, beastly Shiites and Sunnis continuing to ethnically cleanse each other, can they? Of course not!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4055055', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sdfasdf</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/08/31/ohanlon-gao/comment-page-3/#comment-4055053</link>
		<dc:creator>sdfasdf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 19:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/08/31/ohanlon-gao/#comment-4055053</guid>
		<description>TP must guiltily know that MSNBC is so anti-US soldiers that it employed military slanderer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TP must guiltily know that MSNBC is so anti-US soldiers that it employed military slanderer<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4055053', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sdfasdf</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/08/31/ohanlon-gao/comment-page-3/#comment-4055050</link>
		<dc:creator>sdfasdf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 19:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/08/31/ohanlon-gao/#comment-4055050</guid>
		<description>TP must guiltily know that MSNBC is so anti-US soldiers that it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TP must guiltily know that MSNBC is so anti-US soldiers that it<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4055050', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dfasdf</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/08/31/ohanlon-gao/comment-page-3/#comment-4055045</link>
		<dc:creator>dfasdf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 19:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/08/31/ohanlon-gao/#comment-4055045</guid>
		<description>How dare Toilet Paper abuse MSNBC as a source when MSNBC has been exposed time and time again for spreading hateful propaganda against the military. Secondly, TP misconceives the MSNBC article since Bush&#039;s surge is meant to stop only civilian attacks, which the article ADMITS are down. Bush or the US military can&#039;t well be held accountable for the uncivilized, beastly Shiites and Sunnis continuing to ethnically cleanse each other, can they? Of course not!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How dare Toilet Paper abuse MSNBC as a source when MSNBC has been exposed time and time again for spreading hateful propaganda against the military. Secondly, TP misconceives the MSNBC article since Bush&#8217;s surge is meant to stop only civilian attacks, which the article ADMITS are down. Bush or the US military can&#8217;t well be held accountable for the uncivilized, beastly Shiites and Sunnis continuing to ethnically cleanse each other, can they? Of course not!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4055045', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LouisMartin</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/08/31/ohanlon-gao/comment-page-3/#comment-4052854</link>
		<dc:creator>LouisMartin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 21:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/08/31/ohanlon-gao/#comment-4052854</guid>
		<description>On the topic of Iran, does everyone recognize that Iran has three times the population of Iraq and twice the geographic size?

Does everyone remember that Iraq invaded Iran in 1980 and the Iranians fought back for eight years even though Iraq was given weapons by both the USA and the Soviet Union?  In order to repel the invaders, Iran launched human wave suicide attacks and they had a surplus of volunteers for those suicide units.

Does everyone acknowledge that Iran controls the Eastern side of the Strait of Hormuz and has positioned ground to ship missiles in bunkers so deep and well protected that military analysts doubt that even tactical nuclear weapons would not destroy them.  Hormuz is only seven miles wide, 40% of the world&#039;s oil production passes through it, and it could be chocked off by sinking a few supertankers at key turning points in the shipping channel.

Finally, do we all recognize that Iraqi Shia are Arabs and Iranian Shia are Persians and have never worked together successfully for at least the past 3,000 years?

Now who&#039;s going to permit this Shock&amp;Awe II?  Is there anyone in the world community who would support us?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the topic of Iran, does everyone recognize that Iran has three times the population of Iraq and twice the geographic size?</p>
<p>Does everyone remember that Iraq invaded Iran in 1980 and the Iranians fought back for eight years even though Iraq was given weapons by both the USA and the Soviet Union?  In order to repel the invaders, Iran launched human wave suicide attacks and they had a surplus of volunteers for those suicide units.</p>
<p>Does everyone acknowledge that Iran controls the Eastern side of the Strait of Hormuz and has positioned ground to ship missiles in bunkers so deep and well protected that military analysts doubt that even tactical nuclear weapons would not destroy them.  Hormuz is only seven miles wide, 40% of the world&#8217;s oil production passes through it, and it could be chocked off by sinking a few supertankers at key turning points in the shipping channel.</p>
<p>Finally, do we all recognize that Iraqi Shia are Arabs and Iranian Shia are Persians and have never worked together successfully for at least the past 3,000 years?</p>
<p>Now who&#8217;s going to permit this Shock&amp;Awe II?  Is there anyone in the world community who would support us?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4052854', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Chocolate Cavity of the Lord Jesus Mohammed</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/08/31/ohanlon-gao/comment-page-3/#comment-4052099</link>
		<dc:creator>The Chocolate Cavity of the Lord Jesus Mohammed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 06:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/08/31/ohanlon-gao/#comment-4052099</guid>
		<description>&gt;Letâ€™s also not forget that just 6 months ago, the Pentagon changed the &gt;way it reports deaths to lower the perceived number.

Your referring to them recategorizing people who died in car bomb explosions as &quot;not murdered&quot;, right? or something else?

These people love to tinker with definitions...next thing you know, they will start calling families blown up by bombs as &quot;separated&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;Letâ€™s also not forget that just 6 months ago, the Pentagon changed the &gt;way it reports deaths to lower the perceived number.</p>
<p>Your referring to them recategorizing people who died in car bomb explosions as &#8220;not murdered&#8221;, right? or something else?</p>
<p>These people love to tinker with definitions&#8230;next thing you know, they will start calling families blown up by bombs as &#8220;separated&#8221;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4052099', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robt</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/08/31/ohanlon-gao/comment-page-3/#comment-4052058</link>
		<dc:creator>Robt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 06:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/08/31/ohanlon-gao/#comment-4052058</guid>
		<description>To put it simply, 
              O&#039;Hanlon &quot;HOPES&quot; there will be changes to the GAO report. 
 
 It doesn&#039;t matter if they are true or not.  As long as its change reflects his narrow and unfounded opinion.

 3 of 18 benchmarks.  How many lives during this time.  O&#039;Hanlon was present at how many of the funerals?   It is not even for democracy and or freedom any more.  Although it is my &quot;opinion&quot; that it was never for Iraqi freedom or democracy.  Those are nice sounding advertisements for the American people to buy............</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To put it simply,<br />
              O&#8217;Hanlon &#8220;HOPES&#8221; there will be changes to the GAO report. </p>
<p> It doesn&#8217;t matter if they are true or not.  As long as its change reflects his narrow and unfounded opinion.</p>
<p> 3 of 18 benchmarks.  How many lives during this time.  O&#8217;Hanlon was present at how many of the funerals?   It is not even for democracy and or freedom any more.  Although it is my &#8220;opinion&#8221; that it was never for Iraqi freedom or democracy.  Those are nice sounding advertisements for the American people to buy&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4052058', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Chocolate Cavity of the Lord Jesus Mohammed</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/08/31/ohanlon-gao/comment-page-3/#comment-4052032</link>
		<dc:creator>The Chocolate Cavity of the Lord Jesus Mohammed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 06:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/08/31/ohanlon-gao/#comment-4052032</guid>
		<description>&gt;â€œAgain, has Moyers ever been caught in a lie of any kind?â€ 
&gt;Comment by Ripper â€” August 31, 2007 @ 2:25 pm
&gt;
&gt;Who knows?

brilliant retort hermaphdrodite..... &quot;who knows&quot; is your way of saying &quot;no&quot;....when you dont want to admit it. if someone presents facts, the only way to attack their assertions is to  either a) attack their credibility by mentioning episodes of their past dishonesty (&quot;we know where the weapons are&quot;) or attack the facts as they currently present them: (i.e. &quot;murders are only down because you stopped including people who die in car bombs in the category of &quot;murdered&quot;&#039;)

You&#039;ve done neither. Everyone is biased to some degree about everything.
If you were really a lawyer you&#039;d know that claiming &quot;bias&quot; alone without any evidene to support your claims,  isnt going to win you many cases...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;â€œAgain, has Moyers ever been caught in a lie of any kind?â€<br />
&gt;Comment by Ripper â€” August 31, 2007 @ 2:25 pm<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;Who knows?</p>
<p>brilliant retort hermaphdrodite&#8230;.. &#8220;who knows&#8221; is your way of saying &#8220;no&#8221;&#8230;.when you dont want to admit it. if someone presents facts, the only way to attack their assertions is to  either a) attack their credibility by mentioning episodes of their past dishonesty (&#8221;we know where the weapons are&#8221;) or attack the facts as they currently present them: (i.e. &#8220;murders are only down because you stopped including people who die in car bombs in the category of &#8220;murdered&#8221;&#8216;)</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve done neither. Everyone is biased to some degree about everything.<br />
If you were really a lawyer you&#8217;d know that claiming &#8220;bias&#8221; alone without any evidene to support your claims,  isnt going to win you many cases&#8230;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4052032', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pocket Rocket</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/08/31/ohanlon-gao/comment-page-3/#comment-4051105</link>
		<dc:creator>Pocket Rocket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 20:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/08/31/ohanlon-gao/#comment-4051105</guid>
		<description>Glenn Greenwald is going to field say with this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glenn Greenwald is going to field say with this one.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4051105', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gus</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/08/31/ohanlon-gao/comment-page-3/#comment-4051049</link>
		<dc:creator>Gus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 20:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/08/31/ohanlon-gao/#comment-4051049</guid>
		<description>Yes, that &quot;not quite right&quot; data is sure striking. Why not say violence is down 95%? That&#039;s not quite right either, but it certainly is striking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that &#8220;not quite right&#8221; data is sure striking. Why not say violence is down 95%? That&#8217;s not quite right either, but it certainly is striking.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4051049', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Wu</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/08/31/ohanlon-gao/comment-page-3/#comment-4050939</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Wu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 19:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/08/31/ohanlon-gao/#comment-4050939</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Care to tell this 10 year RF EXPERIENCE person how cell phones can work in a Faraday screen and moving at over 200 MPH??????&lt;/i&gt;

Sure.  I&#039;m sure you&#039;ve used (or at least seen someone else use) a cell phone in a parked aircraft, even with the door closed, which proves that an aircraft isn&#039;t a Faraday cage.  Since the range of cellular phones is well in excess of six miles (i.e., typical cruising altitude) there&#039;s no significant range issue.  A cellular phone in a moving aircraft (at 200 MPH or even 500 MPH) may be in communication with a large number of cellular sites at once, which puts an undesirable load on the network infrastructure and may result in lots of handoffs (and a higher incidence of dropped calls), but in general it works fine.  Sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Care to tell this 10 year RF EXPERIENCE person how cell phones can work in a Faraday screen and moving at over 200 MPH??????</i></p>
<p>Sure.  I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ve used (or at least seen someone else use) a cell phone in a parked aircraft, even with the door closed, which proves that an aircraft isn&#8217;t a Faraday cage.  Since the range of cellular phones is well in excess of six miles (i.e., typical cruising altitude) there&#8217;s no significant range issue.  A cellular phone in a moving aircraft (at 200 MPH or even 500 MPH) may be in communication with a large number of cellular sites at once, which puts an undesirable load on the network infrastructure and may result in lots of handoffs (and a higher incidence of dropped calls), but in general it works fine.  Sorry.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4050939', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: râ‚¬nato</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/08/31/ohanlon-gao/comment-page-3/#comment-4050731</link>
		<dc:creator>râ‚¬nato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 18:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/08/31/ohanlon-gao/#comment-4050731</guid>
		<description>GitmoRules spewed:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Why cant the white house have a say in what the reports says?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

How about just let the facts speak for themselves? I know, that&#039;s a foreign concept to your Republican mind...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GitmoRules spewed:</p>
<blockquote><p>Why cant the white house have a say in what the reports says?</p></blockquote>
<p>How about just let the facts speak for themselves? I know, that&#8217;s a foreign concept to your Republican mind&#8230;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4050731', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo Strauss</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/08/31/ohanlon-gao/comment-page-3/#comment-4050710</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo Strauss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 18:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/08/31/ohanlon-gao/#comment-4050710</guid>
		<description>Could someone please direct this jackass to the nearest military recruiting office?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could someone please direct this jackass to the nearest military recruiting office?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4050710', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mighty aphrodite</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/08/31/ohanlon-gao/comment-page-3/#comment-4050707</link>
		<dc:creator>mighty aphrodite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 18:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/08/31/ohanlon-gao/#comment-4050707</guid>
		<description>#999 &lt;em&gt;&quot;MA, I would never argue that Moyers is not a liberal. So what? Is your argument that liberals cannot be believed because they are liberal?&quot;&lt;/em&gt;
Liberals &lt;em&gt;can&lt;/em&gt; be believed  - if you check their sources and read the opposition view.   So because a person is a Conservative you, open minded guy that you are, believe them?? Righhhhtttt............

&quot;&lt;em&gt;You might as well dismiss every statement most of the Framersof our Consitution made. Most of them were liberals as well. &lt;/em&gt;

The framers were &quot;Classical Liberals&quot; which contemporary Liberals are NOT.  Contemporary Liberals seek to expand government  - - Classical Liberals despised the intrusion of the Kings government in their lives....Nice try....you&#039;re no Classical Liberal.  (You should know that progressives and socialist co-opted the term &quot;liberal&quot; hoping to associate their name with the framers. for more widespread acceptance.) 

&lt;em&gt;&quot;Again, has Moyers ever been caught in a lie of any kind?&quot; &lt;/em&gt;
Comment by Ripper â€” August 31, 2007 @ 2:25 pm

Who knows?  He has an agenda and he promotes that agenda by distorting the opposition.


#103 -&lt;em&gt;&quot;Hey, MAâ€¦just one question:  How do you account for the quantities of molten steel found in the basements of the Twin Towers and WTC 7 weeks after the collapses?&lt;/em&gt;
Comment by TripMaster Monkey

Gravity. 


Toodles, tools...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#999 <em>&#8220;MA, I would never argue that Moyers is not a liberal. So what? Is your argument that liberals cannot be believed because they are liberal?&#8221;</em><br />
Liberals <em>can</em> be believed  &#8211; if you check their sources and read the opposition view.   So because a person is a Conservative you, open minded guy that you are, believe them?? Righhhhtttt&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;<em>You might as well dismiss every statement most of the Framersof our Consitution made. Most of them were liberals as well. </em></p>
<p>The framers were &#8220;Classical Liberals&#8221; which contemporary Liberals are NOT.  Contemporary Liberals seek to expand government  &#8211; - Classical Liberals despised the intrusion of the Kings government in their lives&#8230;.Nice try&#8230;.you&#8217;re no Classical Liberal.  (You should know that progressives and socialist co-opted the term &#8220;liberal&#8221; hoping to associate their name with the framers. for more widespread acceptance.) </p>
<p><em>&#8220;Again, has Moyers ever been caught in a lie of any kind?&#8221; </em><br />
Comment by Ripper â€” August 31, 2007 @ 2:25 pm</p>
<p>Who knows?  He has an agenda and he promotes that agenda by distorting the opposition.</p>
<p>#103 -<em>&#8220;Hey, MAâ€¦just one question:  How do you account for the quantities of molten steel found in the basements of the Twin Towers and WTC 7 weeks after the collapses?</em><br />
Comment by TripMaster Monkey</p>
<p>Gravity. </p>
<p>Toodles, tools&#8230;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4050707', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TripMaster Monkey</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/08/31/ohanlon-gao/comment-page-3/#comment-4050664</link>
		<dc:creator>TripMaster Monkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 18:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/08/31/ohanlon-gao/#comment-4050664</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Comment by mighty aphrodite â€” August 31, 2007 @ 2:11 pm&lt;/i&gt;

Hey, MA...just one question:

How do you account for the quantities of molten steel found in the basements of the Twin Towers &lt;i&gt;and&lt;/i&gt; WTC 7 &lt;i&gt;weeks&lt;/i&gt; after the collapses?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Comment by mighty aphrodite â€” August 31, 2007 @ 2:11 pm</i></p>
<p>Hey, MA&#8230;just one question:</p>
<p>How do you account for the quantities of molten steel found in the basements of the Twin Towers <i>and</i> WTC 7 <i>weeks</i> after the collapses?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4050664', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill in Chicago</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/08/31/ohanlon-gao/comment-page-3/#comment-4050656</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill in Chicago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 18:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/08/31/ohanlon-gao/#comment-4050656</guid>
		<description>No, wait . . . Petraeus, I meant Petraeus!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, wait . . . Petraeus, I meant Petraeus!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4050656', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill in Chicago</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/08/31/ohanlon-gao/comment-page-3/#comment-4050652</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill in Chicago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 18:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/08/31/ohanlon-gao/#comment-4050652</guid>
		<description>Yes, I mean, it&#039;s not like Gen. Westmorland would lie about such a serious matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I mean, it&#8217;s not like Gen. Westmorland would lie about such a serious matter.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4050652', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/08/31/ohanlon-gao/comment-page-2/#comment-4050626</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 18:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/08/31/ohanlon-gao/#comment-4050626</guid>
		<description>GAO says only 3 of 18 benchmarks have been met.  Down from 8 in last report.

There was no jet fuel in Building 7.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GAO says only 3 of 18 benchmarks have been met.  Down from 8 in last report.</p>
<p>There was no jet fuel in Building 7.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4050626', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ret. Col. Jack Ripper</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/08/31/ohanlon-gao/comment-page-2/#comment-4050622</link>
		<dc:creator>Ret. Col. Jack Ripper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 18:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/08/31/ohanlon-gao/#comment-4050622</guid>
		<description>MA, I would never argue that Moyers is not a liberal. So what? Is your argument that liberals cannot be believed because they are liberal? You might as well dismiss every statement most of the Framers of our Consitution made. Most of them were liberals as well. Again, has Moyers ever been caught in a lie of any kind? Limbaugh certainly has many times. To argue that Bill Moyers is somehow the liberal equivalent of Rush Limbaugh is simply absurd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MA, I would never argue that Moyers is not a liberal. So what? Is your argument that liberals cannot be believed because they are liberal? You might as well dismiss every statement most of the Framers of our Consitution made. Most of them were liberals as well. Again, has Moyers ever been caught in a lie of any kind? Limbaugh certainly has many times. To argue that Bill Moyers is somehow the liberal equivalent of Rush Limbaugh is simply absurd.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4050622', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ret. Col. Jack Ripper</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/08/31/ohanlon-gao/comment-page-2/#comment-4050609</link>
		<dc:creator>Ret. Col. Jack Ripper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 18:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/08/31/ohanlon-gao/#comment-4050609</guid>
		<description>The reason I think it would be instructive for people to watch Bill Moyers&#039; &quot;Buying the War&quot; is that it puts a propagandist like O&#039;Hanlon in proper perspective. Here he is worrying that a report NOT written by the administration will be too negative and he&#039;s hoping that the administration will have the opportunity to sanitize it. The administration&#039;s own report which will come out this September is not good enough for this propagandist. He needs the administration to contoll ALL reports. This is pure, Soviet-style propaganda.

Everyone should call their own PBS station and ask them to re-show Bill Moyers&#039; &quot;Buying the War.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason I think it would be instructive for people to watch Bill Moyers&#8217; &#8220;Buying the War&#8221; is that it puts a propagandist like O&#8217;Hanlon in proper perspective. Here he is worrying that a report NOT written by the administration will be too negative and he&#8217;s hoping that the administration will have the opportunity to sanitize it. The administration&#8217;s own report which will come out this September is not good enough for this propagandist. He needs the administration to contoll ALL reports. This is pure, Soviet-style propaganda.</p>
<p>Everyone should call their own PBS station and ask them to re-show Bill Moyers&#8217; &#8220;Buying the War.&#8221;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4050609', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
