Comments on: Moyers Responds To Wallace’s Baseless Slander: Repeated Requests To Rove Went Unanswered http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/01/wallace-moyers/ Thu, 26 Nov 2009 04:14:05 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Lost Cause http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/01/wallace-moyers/comment-page-3/#comment-4056184 Lost Cause Tue, 04 Sep 2007 05:25:13 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/09/01/wallace-moyers/#comment-4056184 Rove is a christian like he quit to spend more time with his family Rove is a christian like he quit to spend more time with his family

]]> By: Terry Thomas http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/01/wallace-moyers/comment-page-3/#comment-4053291 Terry Thomas Sun, 02 Sep 2007 13:57:27 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/09/01/wallace-moyers/#comment-4053291 Wallace is a good source of comedy. His idiotic commentary is predictable satire. It wouldn't surprise me to learn that he is just one pigment of Rover's imagination. There are many colors of his trickery. Wallace has the IQ of a rock in comparison. Bill Moyer has a conscience and a drive for the truth. What does Wallace have other than a brown nose and loud mouth. Wallace is a good source of comedy. His idiotic commentary is predictable satire. It wouldn’t surprise me to learn that he is just one pigment of Rover’s imagination. There are many colors of his trickery. Wallace has the IQ of a rock in comparison. Bill Moyer has a conscience and a drive for the truth. What does Wallace have other than a brown nose and loud mouth.

]]> By: Bob http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/01/wallace-moyers/comment-page-3/#comment-4053232 Bob Sun, 02 Sep 2007 05:17:19 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/09/01/wallace-moyers/#comment-4053232 Rove is not a Christian. He has never stoned a homo or adulterer. Ask a true Christian. They stoned people all the time it’s in the bible. Rove is not a Christian.
He has never stoned a homo or adulterer.
Ask a true Christian. They stoned people all the time it’s in the bible.

]]> By: Arn Gunnutes http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/01/wallace-moyers/comment-page-3/#comment-4053191 Arn Gunnutes Sun, 02 Sep 2007 04:06:08 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/09/01/wallace-moyers/#comment-4053191 <em>Bill Moyers worked in Lyndon Johnson’s press office; and Chris Wallace is chastising him for not knowing Reporting 101? What the hell has Chris Wallace done that was any good? For that matter, what has Karl Rove, or George Bush done that were any good? Anybody? Comment by chowderhead — September 1, 2007</em> <strong>Nothing. Not a damn thing... All lies and TREASON, all the time...</strong> Bill Moyers worked in Lyndon Johnson’s press office; and Chris Wallace is chastising him for not knowing Reporting 101?

What the hell has Chris Wallace done that was any good? For that matter, what has Karl Rove, or George Bush done that were any good?

Anybody?

Comment by chowderhead — September 1, 2007

Nothing. Not a damn thing…

All lies and TREASON, all the time…

]]> By: chowderhead http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/01/wallace-moyers/comment-page-3/#comment-4053155 chowderhead Sun, 02 Sep 2007 03:28:52 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/09/01/wallace-moyers/#comment-4053155 Bill Moyers worked in Lyndon Johnson's press office; and Chris Wallace is chastising him for not knowing Reporting 101? What the hell has Chris Wallace done that was any good? For that matter, what has Karl Rove, or George Bush done that were any good? Anybody? Bill Moyers worked in Lyndon Johnson’s press office; and Chris Wallace is chastising him for not knowing Reporting 101?

What the hell has Chris Wallace done that was any good? For that matter, what has Karl Rove, or George Bush done that were any good?

Anybody?

]]> By: Arn Gunnutes http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/01/wallace-moyers/comment-page-3/#comment-4053121 Arn Gunnutes Sun, 02 Sep 2007 02:47:36 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/09/01/wallace-moyers/#comment-4053121 <em>Did political hack Moyers ASK Rove about his religion prior to publishing his smear piece about Rove?</em> <strong> Seems like he TRIED to contact Rove to verify such, but Rove was too CHICKEN(hawk) to reply. So, Moyers asked people who knew Rove WELL. What they told him, admittedly CREDIBLE SOURCES, is that Rove was NOT a really strong believer, pretty much an agnostic. Moyers is a COMPETENT JOURNALIST with YEARS of AWARDS for being a TOP JOURNALIST. Wallace has NONE... Rove is a PROPAGANDIST, and so is Wallace and Fox "news". I believe the TRUE JOURNALIST, Bill Moyers, and American PATRIOT!!! USA! USA! USA!</strong> Did political hack Moyers ASK Rove about his religion prior to publishing his smear piece about Rove?

Seems like he TRIED to contact Rove to verify such, but Rove was too CHICKEN(hawk) to reply.

So, Moyers asked people who knew Rove WELL.

What they told him, admittedly CREDIBLE SOURCES, is that Rove was NOT a really strong believer, pretty much an agnostic.

Moyers is a COMPETENT JOURNALIST with YEARS of AWARDS for being a TOP JOURNALIST.

Wallace has NONE…

Rove is a PROPAGANDIST, and so is Wallace and Fox “news”.

I believe the TRUE JOURNALIST, Bill Moyers, and American PATRIOT!!!

USA! USA! USA!

]]> By: NOT MICHAEL http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/01/wallace-moyers/comment-page-3/#comment-4053070 NOT MICHAEL Sun, 02 Sep 2007 01:28:54 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/09/01/wallace-moyers/#comment-4053070 The difference between Moyers and them is people are willing to sponsor them, Moyers has to rely on taxpayers! Comment by michael — September 1, 2007 @ 4:59 pm Hey MICHAEL 105, Obviously you haven't checked your facts. Seen Mr. Coulters site recently? The only one advertising on Mr. Coulters site is Mr. Coulter, selling his books. I forget what the last delusional hate comment he made, but it was apparently bizarre enough for her sponsors to pull out of her web site and quit Mr. coulter. You can have your own opinion, (do us a favor and keep it to yourself) but you can't make up your own facts. The difference between Moyers and them is people are willing to sponsor them, Moyers has to rely on taxpayers!

Comment by michael — September 1, 2007 @ 4:59 pm

Hey MICHAEL 105,
Obviously you haven’t checked your facts. Seen Mr. Coulters site recently? The only one advertising on Mr. Coulters site is Mr. Coulter, selling his books. I forget what the last delusional hate comment he made, but it was apparently bizarre enough for her sponsors to pull out of her web site and quit Mr. coulter. You can have your own opinion, (do us a favor and keep it to yourself) but you can’t make up your own facts.

]]> By: Cricket http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/01/wallace-moyers/comment-page-3/#comment-4053064 Cricket Sun, 02 Sep 2007 01:16:46 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/09/01/wallace-moyers/#comment-4053064 Do you think Wallace's dad is proud of him? I'll bet hr cringes every time C.W. opens his mouth. They shoul've kept what got thrown away! Do you think Wallace’s dad is proud of him? I’ll bet hr cringes every time
C.W. opens his mouth. They shoul’ve kept what got thrown away!

]]> By: big papa http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/01/wallace-moyers/comment-page-3/#comment-4053058 big papa Sun, 02 Sep 2007 00:56:46 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/09/01/wallace-moyers/#comment-4053058 The corrupt right wing fascist propagandist corporate media... ...sought to confuse the American people with their spin... ...about Liberal-Progressives wanting to "reinstitute a fairness doctrine"... ...in msm... ...where Liberal-progressives consistently fail in debunking this fraudulent conned'selserving strawman position... ...is in NOT hammering home the fact that it's not a FAIRNESS DOCTRINE we need... ...it's a TRUTH DOCTRINE... ...if the pundits LIE on the people's airwaves... ...they should be PUNISHED! ...Fox has made al iving off KNOWINGLY LYING to the al Cracker, DUHMERIKKKAN inbred Bushite base... ...Fox should be DESTROYED! ...and its administration and staff PROSECUTED for TREASON, LIES, and SLANDER.... The corrupt right wing fascist propagandist corporate media…

…sought to confuse the American people with their spin…

…about Liberal-Progressives wanting to “reinstitute a fairness doctrine”…

…in msm…

…where Liberal-progressives consistently fail in debunking this fraudulent conned’selserving strawman position…

…is in NOT hammering home the fact that it’s not a FAIRNESS DOCTRINE we need…

…it’s a TRUTH DOCTRINE…

…if the pundits LIE on the people’s airwaves…

…they should be PUNISHED!

…Fox has made al iving off KNOWINGLY LYING to the al Cracker, DUHMERIKKKAN inbred Bushite base…

…Fox should be DESTROYED!

…and its administration and staff PROSECUTED for TREASON, LIES, and SLANDER….

]]> By: ipod http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/01/wallace-moyers/comment-page-3/#comment-4053054 ipod Sun, 02 Sep 2007 00:47:03 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/09/01/wallace-moyers/#comment-4053054 wtf is an episcopalian? - is it a 'type' of chistian? - in the same way as sunnis and shiites are 'types' of muslims?.....and who really cares what rove is? - atheist,christian,episco-whatever,he's gone now wtf is an episcopalian? – is it a ‘type’ of chistian? – in the same way as sunnis and shiites are ‘types’ of muslims?…..and who really cares what rove is? – atheist,christian,episco-whatever,he’s gone now

]]> By: bilbofaggins http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/01/wallace-moyers/comment-page-3/#comment-4053033 bilbofaggins Sun, 02 Sep 2007 00:07:03 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/09/01/wallace-moyers/#comment-4053033 # Democrats are the party of retreat and defeat. Comment by bilbobaggins If you are going to name jack, please come up with something original. Sheesh…that was pathetic. Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. Comment by bilbogaggins — September 1, 2007 @ 12:51 pm There ya go asswipe! #

Democrats are the party of retreat and defeat.
Comment by bilbobaggins

If you are going to name jack, please come up with something original. Sheesh…that was pathetic.

Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.

Comment by bilbogaggins — September 1, 2007 @ 12:51 pm

There ya go asswipe!

]]> By: Jason M. Hendler http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/01/wallace-moyers/comment-page-3/#comment-4053029 Jason M. Hendler Sat, 01 Sep 2007 23:57:58 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/09/01/wallace-moyers/#comment-4053029 The above story states that Moyers' requests to have Rove come on his show came before Chris Wallace's statements, but that is NOT the point. Did political hack Moyers ASK Rove about his religion prior to publishing his smear piece about Rove? Considering that Moyers has been so slow to respond to Chris Wallace, I suspect that Moyers has been looking for a way to weasel out of admitting he failed Journalism 101 by not asking Rove about his religion prior to publishing his smear piece, and is now trying to state that Rove ignored Moyers after he published it, which is irrelevent. The above story states that Moyers’ requests to have Rove come on his show came before Chris Wallace’s statements, but that is NOT the point.

Did political hack Moyers ASK Rove about his religion prior to publishing his smear piece about Rove?

Considering that Moyers has been so slow to respond to Chris Wallace, I suspect that Moyers has been looking for a way to weasel out of admitting he failed Journalism 101 by not asking Rove about his religion prior to publishing his smear piece, and is now trying to state that Rove ignored Moyers after he published it, which is irrelevent.

]]> By: Arn Gunnutes http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/01/wallace-moyers/comment-page-3/#comment-4052961 Arn Gunnutes Sat, 01 Sep 2007 22:36:08 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/09/01/wallace-moyers/#comment-4052961 <em>Arn, buddy, get a grip. No matter how bad Rove et al might be, that doesn’t make you a better person. Could be time for a review of Luke 27-38. Comment by Man in the Middle</em> <strong> I don't CLAIM to be "better" because I am a CHRISTIAN (I AM a Christian). It's these HYPOCRITES like Diaper/Dildo Vitter, and Larry "bad, nasty boy" Craig who use their "christianity" to demean and defame others by their "holier than thou" BS. As well as PROPAGANDISTS like Karl Rove and George Bush and Fox "news". They have USED God and Jesus as their method to advance their POLITICAL AGENDA and the GENOCIDE that they have committed. And as such have KILLED IN THE NAME OF GOD, the EXACT thing that they accuse the "muzzies" of doing. And Bush was FUNDED by the Bin Ladens and is an OIL WHORBAG for the Saudi FINANCIERS of Al Queda in Iraq. And Osama is STILL FREE. As far as Luke 6:27-38, about PRAYING FOR ONE'S enemies, is THAT what the "christians" who support MURDERERS like Bush do? NOPE. But I DO. It doesn't make me BETTER. It DOES say that Bush and his MURDERERS do NOT follow the Word of God NOR Jesus Christ. And their supporters... ONE MILLION IRAQIS and 4000 US Soldiers, DEAD for the LIES of Bush and his PNAC TRAITORS...</strong> Arn, buddy, get a grip. No matter how bad Rove et al might be, that doesn’t make you a better person. Could be time for a review of Luke 27-38.

Comment by Man in the Middle

I don’t CLAIM to be “better” because I am a CHRISTIAN (I AM a Christian).

It’s these HYPOCRITES like Diaper/Dildo Vitter, and Larry “bad, nasty boy” Craig who use their “christianity” to demean and defame others

by their “holier than thou” BS. As well as PROPAGANDISTS like Karl Rove and George Bush and Fox “news”.

They have USED God and Jesus as their method to advance their POLITICAL AGENDA and the

GENOCIDE that they have committed.

And as such have KILLED IN THE NAME OF GOD, the EXACT thing that they accuse the “muzzies” of doing.

And Bush was FUNDED by the Bin Ladens and is an OIL WHORBAG for the Saudi FINANCIERS of Al Queda in Iraq.

And Osama is STILL FREE.

As far as Luke 6:27-38, about PRAYING FOR ONE’S enemies, is THAT what the “christians” who support MURDERERS like Bush do?

NOPE.

But I DO.

It doesn’t make me BETTER.

It DOES say that Bush and his MURDERERS do NOT follow the Word of God NOR Jesus Christ. And their supporters…

ONE MILLION IRAQIS and 4000 US Soldiers, DEAD for the LIES of Bush and his PNAC TRAITORS…

]]> By: Arn Gunnutes http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/01/wallace-moyers/comment-page-3/#comment-4052946 Arn Gunnutes Sat, 01 Sep 2007 22:25:55 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/09/01/wallace-moyers/#comment-4052946 <em>Isn’t the point really that they never actually SPOKE to him, and therefore made unsubstantiated claims? Duh. Comment by Paul</em> <strong>Did they? PROVE it!! Links?? FACTS?? Or just YOUR speculation? Again, I believe a JOURNALIST like Moyers as opposed to PROPAGANDA like Rove or Fox "news". Duh...</strong> Isn’t the point really that they never actually SPOKE to him, and therefore made unsubstantiated claims? Duh.

Comment by Paul

Did they? PROVE it!!

Links?? FACTS??

Or just YOUR speculation?

Again, I believe a JOURNALIST like Moyers as opposed to PROPAGANDA like Rove or Fox “news”.

Duh…

]]> By: Man in the Middle http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/01/wallace-moyers/comment-page-3/#comment-4052865 Man in the Middle Sat, 01 Sep 2007 21:48:48 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/09/01/wallace-moyers/#comment-4052865 Luke 6:27-38, that is. Luke 6:27-38, that is.

]]> By: Man in the Middle http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/01/wallace-moyers/comment-page-3/#comment-4052861 Man in the Middle Sat, 01 Sep 2007 21:46:55 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/09/01/wallace-moyers/#comment-4052861 Arn, buddy, get a grip. No matter how bad Rove et al <i>might</i> be, that doesn't make <b>you</b> a better person. Could be time for a review of Luke 27-38. Arn, buddy, get a grip. No matter how bad Rove et al might be, that doesn’t make you a better person. Could be time for a review of Luke 27-38.

]]> By: michael http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/01/wallace-moyers/comment-page-3/#comment-4052860 michael Sat, 01 Sep 2007 21:46:48 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/09/01/wallace-moyers/#comment-4052860 "Isn’t the point really that they never actually SPOKE to him, and therefore made unsubstantiated claims? Duh. Comment by Paul — September 1, 2007" They're liberals! That's standard practice for them. “Isn’t the point really that they never actually SPOKE to him, and therefore made unsubstantiated claims? Duh.

Comment by Paul — September 1, 2007″

They’re liberals! That’s standard practice for them.

]]> By: Paul http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/01/wallace-moyers/comment-page-3/#comment-4052852 Paul Sat, 01 Sep 2007 21:44:18 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/09/01/wallace-moyers/#comment-4052852 wow. there are some seriously unhinged liberals on this board. wow. there are some seriously unhinged liberals on this board.

]]> By: Paul http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/01/wallace-moyers/comment-page-3/#comment-4052847 Paul Sat, 01 Sep 2007 21:42:28 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/09/01/wallace-moyers/#comment-4052847 It's a riot that they think they have made some sort of point by showing they tried to contact Rove. Isn't the point really that they never actually SPOKE to him, and therefore made unsubstantiated claims? Duh. It’s a riot that they think they have made some sort of point by showing they tried to contact Rove. Isn’t the point really that they never actually SPOKE to him, and therefore made unsubstantiated claims? Duh.

]]> By: michael http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/01/wallace-moyers/comment-page-3/#comment-4052841 michael Sat, 01 Sep 2007 21:39:52 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/09/01/wallace-moyers/#comment-4052841 "If Bush had truly gone for the SECOND resolution with the U.N. concerning Iraq, Comment by Arn Gunnutes — September 1, 2007" Second? There were already 12! Read # 107 above for a true body count. And that is no Bush friendly website! “If Bush had truly gone for the SECOND resolution with the U.N. concerning Iraq,

Comment by Arn Gunnutes — September 1, 2007″

Second? There were already 12! Read # 107 above for a true body count. And that is no Bush friendly website!

]]>