Due to this action, there are millions of Americans that weep right along with you.

I’m sure that, with a Pres. Gore, there would be 3000 more Americans alive today as well as 14 highly frustrated terrorists. A Pres. Gore would have listened to the “bin Laden to attack in the US” report, rather than ignoring it like Pres. Bush did.

Comment by Democrat Soldier — September 4, 2007 @ 10:55 am”

Unmitigated crapola. Gore’s boss, Hillary Clinton, and her minion, Bill, did nothing about Bin Ladin regardless of the intelligence which determined he was a threat. And I don’t recall Gore saying much concerning the issue, much less critisizing the Clinton Machine about their decision to ignore Bin Ladin even though he would have been handed over to the U.S.

Nope. “Green” Al would have been too busy saving trees to worry much about the lives of mere human beings.

Hey dumbass, do the names Cunningham and Boener ring a bell. They’ve been balling their eyes out on camera lately and last I checked, they’re both proud conservatives.

No, the Florida Supreme Court ruled that all of the State’s ballots should be counted. The Supreme Court ruling prevented the counting of the votes. Later, an independent study of the results showed that if all Florida votes had been counted under any of the approved standards, Al Gore would have won. That’s what happened, a-hole and I, for one, will not forget it. It was a judicial coup which installed a man as president who hadn’t won the election and the history books will remember it that way as well.

Souter is a cry-baby. We need more on the court that don’t quit when associates don’t agree with him. Whaaaaa……whaa……… Sniveling lib.

The Democrats regard the US Constitution as an obstacle …

and:

And the Gore-bot threw away Tennessee and Arkansas because they know him for the fraud & BS machine that he is.

Bush won in Florida, which wouldn’t have mattered had Gore won his native state!

And where in the Constitution does it say that the legally elected president is the one who carries his own state?

Oh, yeah. Right…..

Eedjit.

Cheers,

Of course, the Florida SC was a bunch of Dem party hacks….

Wrong.

… And a recount showed Bush had a plurality….

Wrong.

… And the US HOuse of Rep would have voted Bush in anyways.

True, but at least then the political machinations (coup d’etat for those fluent in Cheese-eating-surrender-monkeyish) would have been more blatant than the Miami “Rent’A'Riot” by Republican staffers flown in by the Dubya campaign.

When you’re hot, you’re hot. One out of three. Maybe you should try for multiple choice; you’d start at 25% by chance and could work up from there.

Cheers,

Dave, I guess this is what passes for an argument in your section of the asylum common yard. Again, all you need to do is read the consortium report to find out that I am correct. If all the votes in Florida had been counted under any of the approved standards, Gore would have won Florida. Here’s the link again, Dave: http://www.aei.org/ docLib/ 20040526_KeatingPaper.pdf

Scroll down a few pages to the table called “Statewide results”. And, then can the b.s. about IQ. You have no real grasp of the facts in this case.

Bush won in Florida, which wouldn’t have mattered had Gore won his native state!

Strap on a pair of frontal lobes, nitwit.

Souter is a typical self-absorbed monomaniac who should have packed it in and made the SCOTUS a more honorable institution. What a crock!

The Democrats regard the US Constitution as an obstacle in their project to turn America into a nanny-state. And talk-radio and the First Amendment are on their agenda for elimination—as is the right to bear arms.

Seven justices (the five Justice majority and Breyer and Souter) INITIALLY agreed upon review that there might be Equal Protection issues in using different standards of counting in different counties. Although seven ended up determining there was indeed an Equal Protection violation, especially due to the fact that different standards are always used to count votes in a presidential election, only five agreed the recounts should stop.

False. The cowardly per curiam falsely claimed that “[s]even Justices of the Court agree that there are constitutional problems with the recount ordered by the Florida Supreme Court that demand a remedy.” This is a lie. Souter and Breyer both stated that no remedy was demanded and in fact said the case should never have been taken (and are rather ambivalent as to whether there actually was any “constitutional problem” in the first place, saying that any that might arise could be best handled in other fashion, you know, like after there was an actual factual basis to work from?). For instance, here’s Breyer: “And the more fundamental equal protection claim might have been left to the state court to resolve if and when it was discovered to have mattered.” They both dissented. Not “concurring as to part I” (see the final sentence there) but “dissenting as to remedy”.

Cheers,

Game over…………….next!

Even this is a distortion. The local federal judge in Broward country was, according to him, about to call for counting the “overvotes,” in which a voter not only marked the box, but wrote the candidate’s name on the ballot as well. His decision was that in these cases, there was clear voter intent. If they count these votes, Gore picks up about 8,000 more.

Can any Bush cultist explain why a “liberal media” would have obscurred and hidden the real results of this study in this manner?