Think Progress

Audience boos Brownback’s proposal to ban gay marriage.»

At the Fox News GOP presidential debate tonight, correspondent Carl Cameron asked a New Hampshire woman whether she wanted gay marriage banned. Her answer — “Absolutely not” — received cheers from the audience. When Sen. Sam Brownback (R-KS) then said he believes the nation should have a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage, the audience loudly booed. Watch it:

Digg It!

Transcript:

HUME: Let’s check in once again down at Young’s Restaurant with Carl Cameron. Carl.

CAMERON: Hi, Brit. Well, in this country, any discussion of family values now has sort of gone into what constitutes a marriage — a man and a man, a man and a woman, gay marriage. A lot of conservatives would like to see a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage, and we have a chance here to talk to Heidi Cherkot (sp?) of Dover, a state employee of Health and Human Services — social worker.

What do you think? Should there be a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage?

HEIDI: Absolutely not. We’re the state of “live free or die” and people should be able to marry the person they love.

CAMERON: Okay, so let’s take that question from Heidi Cherkot (sp?). And there you hear the reaction from Granite staters — the “live free or die” state — and pose this to Sam Brownback. Sen. Brownback, should there be a constitutional amendment banning marriage, and if so, why?

BROWNBACK: Answer to that is yes. And the reason is, this is a foundational institution. It is a foundational institution. I understand this is a divided audience on this.

276







Sort Comments By: Top Rated | Date

276 Responses to “Audience boos Brownback’s proposal to ban gay marriage.”


  1. jake3988 Says:

    This was Fox News hosted, I’m surprised.

    Maybe we’re finally turning a corner against idiots like Brownback!


  2. Clawhorn Office Manager Collie Says:

    Brownback…third tier nobody. This is news?

    Next thing you know there will be a thread attacking Thompson for having a beautiful wife. Oh wait, thats already been done.


  3. Kevin Says:

    A gay person has the right to marry another gay person. It’s an individual right.
    That’s how you convenes people to go along with “allowing” gay marriage. Rights belong to individual not one group of people.


  4. Zit Juice---Spread on Toast for a Real Treat Says:

    Oh my, did Brownback threaten to invade Pakistan or something?


  5. Zit Juice---Spread on Toast for a Real Treat Says:

    A gay person has the right to marry another gay person. It’s an individual right.

    Really? Did you just decide that? On what basis?


  6. RonPaulisaLIBTARDEDCLOWN Says:

    As usual, the professional and irredeemable fraudsters at TP refuse to tell the whole truth. The NH audience of RINOs did boo Brownback when he called for a ban on queer marriage, but that’s only because NH Repubs still slant much too libtardedly. You wouldn’t get this impudent reaction from a southern red state. Nonetheless, contrary to TP’s plot to make Brownback look “rejected,” Brownback did follow up immediately with a statement where he slammed gay marriage because of its deleterious effect on marriage rates as statistically proven in European countries. He also went on to stress that ONLY a mom and a dad could raise a kid in the most favorable way. This got just as loud applause from the questionable, NH audience, but TP’s too chicken to admit this! MORE IMPORTANT is the cheering the NH audience gave to Chris Wallace when he asked Ron “libtarded RINO” Paul why he wants to let Al-Qaeda dictate US foreign policy.


  7. GoTFreeDUMBS?NO Says:

    Rights, NOT given By God, nonetheless. Our Rights and FREEDUMBS WILL DESTROY US.
    Read revelations chapter 18. KJV Bible.

    I,m going to tpm cafe. this site is banning to many good comments.


  8. Power Nugget Says:

    Ron Paul..poster child for the irredeemability of the kooks who think islamosavage terrorists can be reasoned with, kooks who mostly inhabit the left.


  9. Kevin Says:

    Comment by RonPaulisaLIBTARDEDCLOWN — September 5, 2007 @ 10:31 pm

    I take it you have a problem with libertarians. Interesting. So what Government regulation do you support? How much do you want the government to rule over your life? Can you list anything government does better than private industry?


  10. toasterhead Says:

    Brownback did follow up immediately with a statement where he slammed gay marriage because of its deleterious effect on marriage rates as statistically proven in European countries. He also went on to stress that ONLY a mom and a dad could raise a kid in the most favorable way.

    Comment by RonPaulisaLIBTARDEDCLOWN — September 5, 2007 @ 10:31 pm

    I do hope you’ll be following up this mierdafest with some proof of these assertions. I can’t wait to take them down…


  11. Wayne Says:

    Comment by RonPaulisaLIBTARDEDCLOWN

    A whole lot of words there, with no coherent meaning to any of it……..


  12. Starve-A-Bush_Feed-A-Beaver Says:

    Did McCain call anyone a little jerk yet?


  13. Cugel Says:

    As usual, the professional and irredeemable fraudsters at TP refuse to tell the whole truth. Blah, blah, blah! Rant, wheeze, grimance!”

    57% is 57%. “Same rights as traditional marriages” = “same rights as traditional marriages.”

    Maybe a majority of the wing-nuts in attendance at a Republican debate wouldn’t support equal rights, but a majority of Americans do. Period.

    And even quite a few Republicans now hold this position, whatever raving idiots on the far right, like RonPaulisaLIBTARDCLOWN, might think.

    So TP is quite right. The right-wing is totally losing the debate on this point, to the extend that there’s even a debate.

    In ten years the “debate” over gay marriage rights will have about as much relevance as debating whether we “ought to give NEGROES the same rights as WHITES.”

    There was a point in the 60’s and early 70’s when “debating” the civil rights movement had some relevancy to the right-wing Republican base, but not even the far right bothers to talk about undoing the civil rights laws and refusing to allow blacks to vote today.

    That ship sailed a long time ago and it’s too late for the fascists among us to do anything about it. Same thing is happening with gay rights. The far right ass-clowns might not like it but they’re going to have to learn to live with it.


  14. ronjazz Says:

    but that’s only because NH Repubs still slant much too libtardedly. You wouldn’t get this impudent reaction from a southern red state.

    Comment by RonPaulisaLIBTARDEDCLOWN — September 5, 2007 @ 10:31 pm

    No, you wouldn’t get this reaction from a red state, because those poor retards wouldn’t have a clue as to what lies Brownback was telling, he used to many 2-syllable words.

    By Nov. ‘08, there wil be no red states, and America will be free to be great again. It’s just wonderful that a (R)etarded moron like this would encourage the government to deny rights that everyone else has to gays, but fight like hell against paying his fair share of taxes to be able to slam them here. Every post of bigotry, cowardice and ignorance by the right moves them further away from the 70+% of Americans who understand and value freedom, and closer to historical levels of irrelevance. Thanks, TP, for allowing these losers to show their true colors so we can fight them more effectively.


  15. scooter Says:

    Why are the RIGHTS of GAYS, PEDOPHILES, BESTIALS, TRANSEXUALS, POLYGAMISTS, and INCESTS,,, always pushed upon this population by JUDGES?

    Why are the JUDGES who interpret THESE rights basing it upon the CIVIL RIGHTS ACT of 1965,,, when in 1965 NONE of these RIGHTS were recognized by the CONGRESS that SUPPOSSEDLY passed them?

    Why did it take 40 some odd years for JUDGES to (the congress of 1965 sure did not recognize) recognize GAY RIGHTS in this ACT,,, and at the same time CHANGE other laws those same congressmen had made,,, Sodomy, Marriage, Adoption….

    If as TP claims 57% are for HOMOSEXUAL MARRIAGE why don’t they now follow the PROPER course of LAWS in this country and pass it in CONGRESS? Why still go to the JUDGES who INTERPRET what THEY want?

    Why won’t other RIGHTS polygamy, incest, pedophilia, bestiality etc…. also be acknowledged in the same manner as the GAY RIGHTS?

    Should YOU care how the RIGHTS are made,,, as long as the group you support is on the JUDICIAL winning side?


  16. LibTeenie Says:

    Same thing is happening with gay rights. The far right ass-clowns might not like it but they’re going to have to learn to live with it.

    Thats right! Because if the left cant win with popular support they will simply legislate everything into existence and tell us its for our own good. Just relax and accept it.

    About time that the government told us what is best for us and made all the decisions. I cant wait for Edwards to become POTUS so we can all have our regular medical check-ups enforced by bayonet.


  17. scooter Says:

    In ten years the “debate” over gay marriage rights will have about as much relevance as debating whether we “ought to give NEGROES the same rights as WHITES.”

    There was a point in the 60’s and early 70’s when “debating” the civil rights movement had some relevancy to the right-wing Republican base, but not even the far right bothers to talk about undoing the civil rights laws and refusing to allow blacks to vote today.

    That ship sailed a long time ago and it’s too late for the fascists among us to do anything about it. Same thing is happening with gay rights. The far right ass-clowns might not like it but they’re going to have to learn to live with it.

    Comment by Cugel

    VERY CORRECT,,,,

    But don’t stop there,,,,, How much longer must we wait for PEDOPHILES, BESTIALS, POLYGAMISTS, INCESTS, ETC to also get thier RIGHTS?

    Do YOU think ONE day YOUR going to have to live with other RIGHTS you might not approve of?


  18. Leo Says:

    Caught you in a lie.
    I read the poll:

    CNN/Opinion Research Corporation Poll. Aug. 6-8, 2007. N=1,029 adults nationwide. MoE ± 3.

    .

    “Do you think marriages between homosexuals should or should not be recognized by the law as valid, with the same rights as traditional marriages?”

    .

    Should Should Not Unsure
    % % %
    8/6-8/07
    40 57 3


  19. BARTLEBEE Says:

    You sure they weren’t just booing Brownback?


  20. Jasper Says:

    I cant wait for Edwards to become POTUS so we can all have our regular medical check-ups enforced by bayonet.

    Yuppers, though Eddie never did explain what would happen if someone refused to go to the doctor for a regular exam.

    If someone refuses to go, will their universal coverage be denied…and how can it be denied if its universal coverage?

    Catch-22, the remake, starring John Edwards as Capt. John Yossarian.


  21. scooter Says:

    How do we know that the 57% approval on Marriage is a LIE….

    Because YOU and I (or our congressman or woman will never get to vote on it).


  22. Leo Says:

    The poll states most Americans are agianst gay Marruiage.
    TP has lied!


  23. zappodave Says:

    Comment by scooter

    Hey Scooter ? I thought you folks were for State’s Rights? Well it looks like State’s are deciding.

    Besides, I bet you’re one of those bathroom toetappers. Right?


  24. LibTeenie Says:

    Do YOU think ONE day YOUR going to have to live with other RIGHTS you might not approve of?

    The left doesnt live by the rules, they just make them.


  25. Leo Says:

    More from the poll!

    “Do you think marriages between same-sex couples should or should not be recognized by the law as valid, with the same rights as traditional marriages?”

    .

    Should Should Not Unsure

    %
    %
    %

    5/10-13/07
    46
    53
    1

    5/8-11/06
    42
    56
    2


  26. Leo Says:

    scooter
    TP Lied!
    Read the Poll!


  27. zappodave Says:

    So “Scooter Pie” here …

    Might be upset because the issue that was going to keep the Republican Party in a “permanent majority” just when down the crapper.

    A Republican, at a Republican Presidential Primary Debate, run by FOX no less, just got booed and loudly by the crowd.

    There goes 2008 for the GOP.

    Have a nice night Scooter.


  28. scooter Says:

    When is the RESEARCH for PEDOPHILES going to begin,,,,
    You know the same stuff that tells us they are BORN that WAY and it’s all about LOVE. (like the gays)

    The REAL research (with a predetermined goal) does not begin until the last deviant behaivoir is passed,,, GAYS RIGHTS…. I do believe we are ready for the next step,, how about YOU?


  29. Leo Says:

    Hey TPers,
    I read the poll.

    57% oppose Gay Marriage Rights!

    Ha ha you lied!


  30. LibTeenie Says:

    A Republican, at a Republican Presidential Primary Debate, run by FOX no less, just got booed and loudly by the crowd.

    Yeah, wow, what a wild night. A republican who barely clears 3% and isnt exactly a household name outside of his own neighborhood gets booed.

    Hoooo weee, its the downfall of the GOP alright.


  31. zappodave Says:

    Hey Scooter?

    Ever seen two gals kiss? Does that repulse you too?

    Why do you hate Gay people so much?


  32. Don Says:

    zappodave ,

    I support Polygamy!
    Let’s legalize it!


  33. scooter Says:

    Hey Scooter ? I thought you folks were for State’s Rights? Well it looks like State’s are deciding.

    Besides, I bet you’re one of those bathroom toetappers. Right?

    Comment by zappodave

    I’m about as supportive of states determining GAY RIGHTS as YOU are on states determining ABORTION.

    I’m actually more so, as I believe CONGRESS should decide both…


  34. zappodave Says:

    Hey Scooter?

    Why is it that time after time - the one’s that protest so much like yourself over Gay rights, are the one’s that wind up getting caught in the bathroom smoking another man’s joint? (tap tap - tap tap tap)

    Just curious? Why is that?


  35. Don Says:

    scooter,

    TP lied!
    Read the poll!


  36. scooter Says:

    Hey Scooter?

    Ever seen two gals kiss? Does that repulse you too?

    Why do you hate Gay people so much?

    Comment by zappodave

    DITTO,,,
    Ever seen a BROTHER and SISTER KISS? Does that repuse you too?

    Why do you hate INCESTUAS people so much?

    PLEASE use this for PEDOPHILE, BESTIALS, POLYGAMISTS, ETC…. Rights baby Rights


  37. Jasper Says:

    Good point scooter. Bestialists are BORN that way, dont you know, and need to be accepted into our forgiving multicultural society. Fourth grade field trips to the zoo are going to become quite the adventure for the little tots.

    And lets not forget the muslim honor-killers who hack apart their daughters because they wore tight jeans…they need to be accepted too.

    Lets also not forget the folks who want to perform female circumcisions on toddlers, they need to be respected as part of our society.

    Cant wait for this; we might not like it but we’re going to have to live with it.


  38. scooter Says:

    Hey Scooter?

    Why is it that time after time - the one’s that protest so much like yourself over Gay rights, are the one’s that wind up getting caught in the bathroom smoking another man’s joint? (tap tap - tap tap tap)

    Just curious? Why is that?

    Comment by zappodave

    zappo,,, can this be used to say something about YOU considering you MAY oppose PEDOPHILE RIGHTS?
    And I emphasize MAY due to your current LOGIC.


  39. zappodave Says:

    I’m about as supportive of states determining GAY RIGHTS as YOU are on states determining ABORTION.

    At least you are admitting you are picking and choosing. Now.

    The problem with that arguement is the Right Wing and Republicans are supposed to the the champions of State’s Rights, not Democrats, don’t you agree? Therefore you’re position is twisted.


  40. jb Says:

    These bigots against gay marriage are just afraid the gays will be better at marriage than they are.


  41. zappodave Says:

    PEDOPHILE RIGHTS ?? Scooter

    Are there not laws in place now against pedophiles?


  42. ronjazz Says:

    Do YOU think ONE day YOUR going to have to live with other RIGHTS you might not approve of?

    Comment by scooter — September 5, 2007 @ 11:01 pm

    Hey, nobody’s shot you yet, so obviously we’re all living with RIGHTARDS we don’t approve of. Your pride in your bigotry and ignorance marks you as one of those hill folk that Deliverance was based on, so really, go back to making it with your goats, but don’t do it in the open, because that’s still illegal. As far as the rest of your list goes, pedophiles, bestiality, polygamy and incest, take it up with your GOP, they’re the ones doing all that stuff, and getting away with it. You’re wasting your time yelling about it here, we don’t support any of that. Gay marriage, however, is another thing entirely, and you’ll find that we civilized people support it because it harms nobody, and it’s not really any of our business, or yours. And as far as judges are concerned, all you’re really saying is that you don’t believe in the Constitution or American law and custom, so why should anyone listen to a word you have to say? You’re not an American, you have no say on this subject. Therefore, gays will attain the rights we all have, and sooner than later. This is a liberal country, that’s what keeps us strong and free. The only time we are weak and in danger is when conservatives steal the government, like right now, when China could destroy us justby shutting off the money. That’s what the GOP has brought us; danger from terrorists, danger from China and Russia, danger from within. Gays marrying are not a danger, not even to ignorant bigots like you.


  43. zappodave Says:

    Ahhhh let’s hear all those bathroom toe tappers chime in against Gay Rights.

    Cracks me up.


  44. jb Says:

    Against gay marriage …don’t marry one. against abortion…don’t have one. Stop pushing your ideology on me…take responsibility for yourself and shut the F up.


  45. scooter Says:

    Lets start a wager on what future RIGHT will be the NEXT one to follow in the footsteps of GAY RIGHTS.

    HMMMMM,,, pedophilia, bestiality, incest, polygamy, obesity, short folks, redheads, and hockey players named RALPH…

    I’m going with the PEDO’S,,, they seem to have the best help with the LIBTARDS and ACLU,,, giving moral support to NAMBLA,,, (north american man boy love association)

    This could change very quickly however if any other RIGHTS look KINDLY upon the LIBTARD ideology.


  46. ronjazz Says:

    You sure they weren’t just booing Brownback?

    Comment by BARTLEBEE — September 5, 2007 @ 11:03 pm

    You mean on general principles? That would be pretty cool at a FOX-sponsored Repig “debate”. I thought it was a meeting of the Stupid Blow-dried Closet Club.


  47. scooter Says:

    At least you are admitting you are picking and choosing. Now.

    The problem with that arguement is the Right Wing and Republicans are supposed to the the champions of State’s Rights, not Democrats, don’t you agree? Therefore you’re position is twisted.

    Comment by zappodave

    Dave,,, one side is no more picking and choosing than the other… Or don’t you think LIBTARDS are PICKING.

    Furthermore,,,, both GAY RIGHTS and ABORTION were not passed by CONGRESS but by JUDGES. Massachusetts being the exception.


  48. Jasper Says:

    Against gay marriage …don’t marry one. against abortion…don’t have one. Stop pushing your ideology on me…take responsibility for yourself and shut the F up.

    Against exposing yourself to kids, dont do it. Against walking naked through the mall, dont walk there. Against hearing someone call you a racial slur, close your ears.

    Take responsibility for yourself, thats rich. Ill remember that next time I openly carry a handgun through San Franciso or demand that a welfare-abuser prove they cant work.


  49. scooter Says:

    RON,,,, your definition TODAY on what HARMS us is as different 40 years ago (back then GAYS were mentally unbalanced and harmed each other) as in the next 40 years YOU have NO idea where RIGHTS are going.

    Or do you think YOUR counterpart 40 years ago also saw the progress of GAY RIGHTS.


  50. ronjazz Says:

    Can you list anything government does better than private industry?

    Comment by Kevin — September 5, 2007 @ 10:37 pm

    How big a list do you want? Can you list anything that private industry can do better than government?


  51. LibTeenie Says:

    Im surprised the new dem houses havent pushed this issue, considering the groundswell of support it has from the American people.

    Must be an election year coming up….what are they afraid of?


  52. ronjazz Says:

    Furthermore,,,, both GAY RIGHTS and ABORTION were not passed by CONGRESS but by JUDGES. Massachusetts being the exception.

    Comment by scooter — September 5, 2007 @ 11:22 pm

    Judges are part of the system, Scooper. YUou’re inability to accept that disqualifes you from discussing the issue. Nothing you say has any relevance. Thsi is America, not Scooperville.


  53. scooter Says:

    the year 2030,,, JUDGE miller rules that the AGE of CONSENT is discriminatory towards citizens of this nation that are very young. He therefore rules that societies laws on ADULT are changed to 10 and PEDOPHILES the world over REJOICE and set up a REAL PARADE,,, (not one of those boring GAY one’s)

    He uses the prior precedent of the 1965 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT and says he only follows the same precedent of other judges changing,,, Sodomy, Marriage, and Adoption for GAY RIGHTS.

    The future’s sooo bright ,,,, gotta wear shades.


  54. LibTeenie Says:

    Can you list anything that private industry can do better than government?

    Ill take a stab at it: create and foster an entreprenurial spirit which currently provides us access to so many cool things.


  55. jb Says:

    Thsi is America, not Scooperville.

    Comment by ronjazz — September 5, 2007 @ 11:28 pm

    Poor scooter…afraid of his own thoughts.


  56. scooter Says:

    Judges are part of the system, Scooper. YUou’re inability to accept that disqualifes you from discussing the issue. Nothing you say has any relevance. Thsi is America, not Scooperville.

    Comment by ronjazz

    They sure are,,,, they are needed to determine MORE rights than the CIVIL RIGHTS ACT of 1965 recognized.
    Those bigots back then,,, recognizing BLACK and WOMENS rights but not GAYS….
    YEP,,,, Judges just part of the system…

    When they recognize RIGHTS YOU don’t like will they be part of the SYSTEM then? Or will you just become a simple minded BIGOT that revels in being a PEDOPHOBE?


  57. jb Says:

    Next thing, scooter will be demanding that women wear head scarves.


  58. LibTeenie Says:

    Keep going scooter, your opponents have been reduced to ad hominems.

    This has been quite the one-sided show so far.


  59. Patrick Says:

    I agree that marriage is going downhill in the country and that the government should step in a do what it can to save this valuable institution. In order to fight the real cause of the breakdown of marriages, I support a constitutional admendment that would ban all divorces and would make adultary a federal crime punishable by 20 years in prison. THAT would save the sanctity of marriage.


  60. ronjazz Says:

    Or do you think YOUR counterpart 40 years ago also saw the progress of GAY RIGHTS.

    Comment by scooter — September 5, 2007 @ 11:24 pm

    I fought for gay rights 40 years ago, and I won. And I’m not even gay, but I am a true American, believing in freedom for all, not bigotry and fear. I have been a civil rights activist for 45 years now, and I don’t separate out the citizens needs like you do, scooper. All Americans are free and equal, that’s my position. Incest, bestiality and pedophilia are illegal, for good reason. Homosexuality isn’t, also for good reason. Polygamy is an interesting question, but I’m not going to fight for polygamist’s rights; they have enough problems. I know this for a fact: the GOP has done far more damage to America than all the gays in the world could do, ever. If anything should be outlawed, it’s the Republican Party.


  61. scooter Says:

    Poor scooter…afraid of his own thoughts.

    Comment by jb

    Actually,,, I welcome all RIGHTS and societies abilty to determine them.
    Such as PEDOHILE, BESTIAL, INCEST, POLYGAMY, etc…
    When YOU support GAY RIGHTS and not the OTHERS then the FEAR becomes quite apparent.


  62. ronjazz Says:

    When they recognize RIGHTS YOU don’t like will they be part of the SYSTEM then? Or will you just become a simple minded BIGOT that revels in being a PEDOPHOBE?

    Comment by scooter — September 5, 2007 @ 11:32 pm

    Judges hand down decisions all the time that I don’t like. The SCOTUS handed this country to an evil sociopath in 2000, a very bad, unConstitutional, illegal, immoral, totally political decision based on money and power. I don’t blame all judges, and I’m not about to throw the whole system out because of a handful of traitors. They can be dealt wth once we flush your party of pedophiles and mul–f*ckers.


  63. jb Says:

    When they recognize RIGHTS YOU don’t like will they be part of the SYSTEM then?

    #

    Comment by scooter — September 5, 2007 @ 11:32 pm
    #

    They already do….Bigot christians have the right to breathe and shoot off their big mouths and I don’t like it, but I accept that everyone has the right to be as stupid as they want to be as long as they don’t infringe on my rights. Hence my suggestion: Against gay marriage …don’t marry one. against abortion…don’t have one. Stop pushing your ideology on me…take responsibility for yourself and shut the F up.


  64. ronjazz Says:

    scooper, you are so obsessed with the pedophile, bestiality, etc. list that you are starting to sound pretty weird. are you just another filthy pervert? you sure sound like one.


  65. LibTeenie Says:

    I fought for gay rights 40 years ago, and I won. And I’m not even gay, but I am a true American, believing in freedom for all, not bigotry and fear.

    Baloney. You once referred to Oklahoma as “Oklahomo”…right here on this very site.

    Dont be dishonest in your attempt to defend.


  66. scooter Says:

    I fought for gay rights 40 years ago, and I won. And I’m not even gay, but I am a true American, believing in freedom for all, not bigotry and fear. I have been a civil rights activist for 45 years now, and I don’t separate out the citizens needs like you do, scooper. All Americans are free and equal, that’s my position. Incest, bestiality and pedophilia are illegal, for good reason. Homosexuality isn’t, also for good reason. Polygamy is an interesting question, but I’m not going to fight for polygamist’s rights; they have enough problems. I know this for a fact: the GOP has done far more damage to America than all the gays in the world could do, ever. If anything should be outlawed, it’s the Republican Party.

    Comment by ronjazz

    Nice to see your INVOLVED in the system….
    How about letting the rest of us in where WE have a say too,,, LIKE VOTING

    Sad to see your a HYPOCRITE for not supporting others RIGHTS (and if you don’t support them then recognize the process they will copy).

    Maybe you don’t know about the folks that support these other RIGHTS,,,, just waiting for JUDGES to make them LEGAL too…..

    Alls well that ends well,,,,,, ehhh


  67. toasterhead Says:

    Against gay marriage …don’t marry one. against abortion…don’t have one. Stop pushing your ideology on me…take responsibility for yourself and shut the F up.

    Comment by jb — September 5, 2007 @ 11:37 pm

    How dare you infringe on the rights of the intolerant like that! Can’t they be allowed to hate in peace?


  68. LibTeenie Says:

    Like I said, ad hominems, witness the regression of ronjazz and jb.

    Game. Set. Match. Scooter.

    This has been a dismantling of epic proportions.


  69. jb Says:

    How dare you infringe on the rights of the intolerant like that! Can’t they be allowed to hate in peace?

    Comment by toasterhead — September 5, 2007 @ 11:39 pm

    I’m sure they will continue no matter what I say.


  70. scooter Says:

    They already do….Bigot christians have the right to breathe and shoot off their big mouths and I don’t like it, but I accept that everyone has the right to be as stupid as they want to be as long as they don’t infringe on my rights. Hence my suggestion: Against gay marriage …don’t marry one. against abortion…don’t have one. Stop pushing your ideology on me…take responsibility for yourself and shut the F up.

    Comment by jb

    JB,,,, against pedophile marriage… don’t marry one.
    against bestial PARADES,, don’t go to one.
    against INCEST couples don’t be one,,,, stop pushing your ideology on me …. ETC ETC


  71. LibTeenie Says:

    take responsibility for yourself and shut the F up.

    I must agree with the earlier poster. I wish to responsibily carry a gun in public and of course no one will have a problem with that since I am being responsible and not pushing my ideology on anyone.

    Dont like guns? Ok with me, dont carry one.


  72. Kyle Says:

    I wish the republicans would get some real balls in being pro marriage and go after divorce. You in Newt?


  73. ronjazz Says:

    JB,,,, against pedophile marriage… don’t marry one.
    against bestial PARADES,, don’t go to one.
    against INCEST couples don’t be one,,,, stop pushing your ideology on me …. ETC ETC

    just get rid of Republicans scooper, all of that will go away.


  74. numfar Says:

    the year 2030,,, JUDGE miller rules that the AGE of CONSENT is discriminatory towards citizens of this nation that are very young. He therefore rules that societies laws on ADULT are changed to 10 and PEDOPHILES the world over REJOICE and set up a REAL PARADE,,, (not one of those boring GAY one’s)

    He uses the prior precedent of the 1965 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT and says he only follows the same precedent of other judges changing,,, Sodomy, Marriage, and Adoption for GAY RIGHTS.

    The future’s sooo bright ,,,, gotta wear shades.

    Comment by scooter — September 5, 2007 @ 11:29 pm

    This, I assume, must be some sort of twisted fantasy you use to jerk off with.

    Maybe you should find a consenting adult and live out your fantasies that way.


  75. jb Says:

    JB,,,, against pedophile marriage… don’t marry one.
    against bestial PARADES,, don’t go to one.
    against INCEST couples don’t be one,,,, stop pushing your ideology on me …. ETC ETC

    Comment by scooter — September 5, 2007 @ 11:42 pm

    Thanks, I won’t if you won’t.


  76. scooter Says:

    How dare you infringe on the rights of the intolerant like that! Can’t they be allowed to hate in peace?

    Comment by toasterhead

    YEP,,,, I’m soo intolerant that i’m asking this country to pass GAY RIGHTS laws in CONGRESS…. just like the CIVIL RIGHTS ACT was passed for BLACKS and WOMEN.

    You are so liberated that you approve of the process wherby I (and everyone else) has no say in the matter.

    LIBTARD liberation at its best,,,,


  77. LibTeenie Says:

    Ad hominem’er #3 in numfar.

    So much for “Think Progress”.


  78. scooter Says:

    This, I assume, must be some sort of twisted fantasy you use to jerk off with.

    Maybe you should find a consenting adult and live out your fantasies that way.

    Comment by numfar

    YOUR opinion of who is an ADULT and just what constitutes CONSENT will be very different from what a future JUDGE will view it.
    Just look at societies view on GAY RIGHTS 40 years ago VS. today and copy that for OTHER RIGHTS.

    PLUS,,, in that DAY you will be a BIGOT and have NO SAY in the matter or VOTE. NICE ehhhhh


  79. Power Nugget Says:

    Holy crapoly, I leave for awhile and come back to this? WOW, Ive never seen the libs so…so…so…silenced.

    Heh, I wont read all the posts but its not looking good for the resident libtrolls.


  80. jb Says:

    I has no say in the matter.

    Comment by scooter — September 5, 2007 @ 11:45 pm

    You can SAY whatever you want.


  81. scooter Says:

    You can SAY whatever you want.

    Comment by jb

    I’d assume you would recognize that this means a VOTE on the MATTER or ,,, a congressman VOTEING on the MATTER (can be voted out by you).

    I now recognize LIBTARD ideology has rendered you MUTE when it comes to recognizing societies RIGHTS and VOTING….


  82. numfar Says:

    Oops…my bad…I didn’t realize scooter was a troll full of douchebaggery.


  83. scooter Says:

    I don’t know why BROWNBACK is pushing for a LEGISLATIVE BAN on gay marriage,,, when all he needs to do is follow the example of the GAY RIGHTS LOBBY and just get a JUDGE to do his (DIRTY) work for him?


  84. aBetterNation Says:

    I hate to point this out, but the CNN poll sited states the OPPOSITE of what is claimed. 57% do NOT think that gays should have the same rights for marriage.

    *sigh*. Still too many backwards people in this country that think that there is choice in area of sexual preference. It’s purely out of bigotry, with the backdrop of “christian” values.


  85. Kilo Says:

    A recent CNN poll found that 57 percent of the American public believe gay marriages should have the “same rights as traditional marriages.

    Liar. That poll says 57% oppose such rights.

    http://pollingreport.com/civil.htm

    CNN/Opinion Research Corporation Poll. Aug. 6-8, 2007.
    N=1,029 adults nationwide. MoE ± 3.

    “Do you think marriages between homosexuals should or should not be recognized by the law as valid, with the same rights as traditional marriages?”

    Should – 40 %
    Should Not — 57 %
    Unsure — 3 %


  86. LibTeenie Says:

    Youve done well scooter, thanks for the show. Even ronjazz has been silenced and he is usually good for a few slurs when he starts to lose.

    Night all, its workie workie time in a few hours.


  87. scooter Says:

    Oops…my bad…I didn’t realize scooter was a troll full of douchebaggery.

    Comment by numfar

    Do you think the SUPPORTERS of PEDOPHILE RIGHTS will use this comment on YOU when they are recognized by a JUDGE too?

    NAHHH,,,, they will probably be a little to high class for that..


  88. jb Says:

    I now recognize LIBTARD ideology has rendered you MUTE when it comes to recognizing societies RIGHTS and VOTING….

    Comment by scooter — September 5, 2007 @ 11:52 pm

    I’ve been married for 35 years and I don’t want anybody voting as to whether my marriage is legal or not. Nobody elses business by that of my wife and myself.


  89. alp3 Says:

    scooter needs an outlet. i’m not offering up mine. but, there’s got to be one in somewhere. Try Nevada, sir squeaky.


  90. Kilo Says:

    Hey, with such gross factual error, this could be the perfect opportunity for ThinkProgress’ first ever correction to a misleading claim in an article.
    Anyone want to bet that happens before the sun burns out ?
    Such great standards here.


  91. scooter Says:

    A recent CNN poll found that 57 percent of the American public believe gay marriages should have the “same rights as traditional marriages.

    Liar. That poll says 57% oppose such rights

    Of course it was a LIE to begin with…. the fact the GAY LOBBY is not TAKING it to the people is all WE need to know about societies opinions


  92. alp3 Says:

    why do you have such a huge hard on over gay rights, squeak?


  93. jb Says:

    Now, if I think christians should be castrated after the birth of their second child and managed to pass such a law, would you want a judge to strike it down?


  94. scooter Says:

    I’ve been married for 35 years and I don’t want anybody voting as to whether my marriage is legal or not. Nobody elses business by that of my wife and myself.

    Comment by jb

    GREAT…. then recognize the 50 year old GEEZER and his 12 year old (very mature) wife is none of YOUR BUSINESS either.


  95. toasterhead Says:

    YEP,,,, I’m soo intolerant that i’m asking this country to pass GAY RIGHTS laws in CONGRESS…. just like the CIVIL RIGHTS ACT was passed for BLACKS and WOMEN.

    You are so liberated that you approve of the process wherby I (and everyone else) has no say in the matter.

    LIBTARD liberation at its best,,,,

    Comment by scooter — September 5, 2007 @ 11:45 pm

    I do approve of the process, as well as the process of judicial review that correctly strikes down “Defense of Marriage” hate legislation.

    See, a functioning democracy needs all three branches in order to function. The legislative and executive branches are subject to the political whims of the many interest groups that manipulate public opinion.

    Without judicial review, we’d still have segregated schools, interracial marriages would be banned, housing discrimination would be legal, arrested suspects would not be guaranteed a lawyer or even be notified of their rights at the time of their arrest, prior restraint would be legal, and the government could arrest and imprison you for speaking against it.

    Is that the type of country you’d rather live in?


  96. jb Says:

    Scooter, children are already protected by law. Between consenting adults its nobody elses business.


  97. alp3 Says:

    Everything that TP posts is incorrect, and anyone with at least half a brain realizes immediately that TP is blatantly lying.

    And, no, they will not correct the post.

    Comment by Master P — September 6, 2007 @ 12:03 am

    just what are a master of, p?


  98. scooter Says:

    Without judicial review, we’d still have segregated schools, interracial marriages would be banned, housing discrimination would be legal, arrested suspects would not be guaranteed a lawyer or even be notified of their rights at the time of their arrest, prior restraint would be legal, and the government could arrest and imprison you for speaking against it.

    Is that the type of country you’d rather live in?

    Comment by toasterhead

    Would we still have that? How about SLAVERY? How was it abolished? How about womens SUFFRAGE? How about the civil rights act of 1965? What did that change?

    Your assumption that WE would not have changed these is ridiculous at best.

    How is the CIVIL RIGHTS ACT of 1965 related to GAY RIGHTS when nothing was done FOR gay rights when they passed it? How can judicial REVIEW interpret that?
    How come when they passed this act in 1965 they did not also change SODOMY? They had HOMOSEXUALS back then you know….

    How come YOU are defending JUDICIAL ACTIVISM and calling it REVIEW when you should be pushing CONGRESS to extend the CIVIL RIGHTS ACT towards GAY RIGHTS? Is BAD LAW good, just for groups you approve of?


  99. alp3 Says:

    Master p.. where? little sniveler? that;s the question.


  100. Frank J Says:

    Then I’m sure that Hillary will make this issue the centerpiece of her campaign.


  101. gummitch Says:

    Do you think the SUPPORTERS of PEDOPHILE RIGHTS will use this comment on YOU when they are recognized by a JUDGE too?

    NAHHH,,,, they will probably be a little to high class for that..

    Comment by scooter — September 5, 2007 @ 11:56 pm

    Why are dumbsh!ts like scooter (and that’s a wonderful image; why not get your dog’s worms treated?) unable to distinguish between adult relationships and pedophilia?


  102. alp3 Says:

    and if not, frank j, will you stomp and whine? like a good little con.


  103. toasterhead Says:

    Toasterhead,

    Fukc YOU!!!

    Comment by Master P — September 6, 2007 @ 12:07 am

    Still waiting for you to prove me wrong. What’s your ETA on that answer?


  104. gummitch Says:

    Fukc YOU!!!

    Comment by Master P — September 6, 2007 @ 12:07 am

    I thought you hated the homos, Mr Pee. You were all about throwing them under the bus, and now you want to fukc a guy? Can’t you make up your “mind”?


  105. ronjazz Says:

    You are so liberated that you approve of the process wherby I (and everyone else) has no say in the matter.

    LIBTARD liberation at its best,,,,

    Comment by scooter — September 5, 2007 @ 11:45 pm

    of course you have no say in the matter. Slavery was also outlawed.


  106. scooter Says:

    Scooter, children are already protected by law. Between consenting adults its nobody elses business.

    Comment by jb

    Sure JB,,,, all you do is change the definition of ADULT…
    Who decides what age is an ADULT and why PEDOPHILES are not being discriminated against because they are BORN with an attraction to 10 year olds?

    DING DING DING,,,, A JUDGE…. CORRECTO

    Any law society sets can be changed for a group and their RIGHTS that a JUDGE determines is part of the CIVIL RIGHTS ACT of 1965.
    bestials, polygamy, incests, obesity, redheads


  107. toasterhead Says:

    How come YOU are defending JUDICIAL ACTIVISM and calling it REVIEW when you should be pushing CONGRESS to extend the CIVIL RIGHTS ACT towards GAY RIGHTS? Is BAD LAW good, just for groups you approve of?

    Comment by scooter — September 6, 2007 @ 12:08 am

    Because I believe Congress has about 17,500 better ways to spend their time other than gay marriage legislation.


  108. gummitch Says:


    Then I’m sure that Hillary will make this issue the centerpiece of her campaign.

    Comment by Frank J — September 6, 2007 @ 12:09 am

    WTF has Hillary got to do with this? Oh, sorry. Nothing. It’s just another attempt by lame whiny little morons like “frank j” to change the subject.


  109. alp3 Says:

    what’s it going to be, master P? where are you willing to put that thing?


  110. scooter Says:

    of course you have no say in the matter. Slavery was also outlawed.

    Comment by ronjazz

    By CONGRESS no less,,,, (gotta love those judges and REVIEW)


  111. Frank J Says:

    If you really believe the vast majority of the American people want gay marriage then I would think a shrewd poll driven candidate like Hillary would make this the centerpiece of her campaign.

    That is if you believe this thread…..apparently she and all the other Democrats do not.


  112. flo Says:

    tap tap tap tap tap tap …………..


  113. gummitch Says:

    Sure JB,,,, all you do is change the definition of ADULT…
    Who decides what age is an ADULT and why PEDOPHILES are not being discriminated against because they are BORN with an attraction to 10 year olds?

    DING DING DING,,,, A JUDGE…. CORRECTO

    Any law society sets can be changed for a group and their RIGHTS that a JUDGE determines is part of the CIVIL RIGHTS ACT of 1965.
    bestials, polygamy, incests, obesity, redheads

    Comment by scooter — September 6, 2007 @ 12:12 am

    Scoots, please take your medication. This is gibberish.

    If you think I’m giving up redheads just because you experimented too much with your buddies, you have another think coming.


  114. scooter is cuz Says:

    scooter! i just fetched me up a bucket full of ball sacks!
    come on over, ther’s enough to ger around!


  115. scooter Says:

    Because I believe Congress has about 17,500 better ways to spend their time other than gay marriage legislation.

    Comment by toasterhead

    BUT not our JUDICIAL system,,,, they most certainly don’t have better things to REVIEW than GAY RIGHTS.

    Apparently it’s important enough that YOU think it is a RIGHT. What could be more important for CONGRESS in YOUR opinion than that?


  116. ronjazz Says:

    Toasterhead,

    Fukc YOU!!!

    Comment by Master P — September 6, 2007 @ 12:11 am

    No proof there, masterbaiter p. Just your usual lack of control and chidish tantrum.


  117. Hugo Chavez Says:

    Hey guys New poll!

    58% of democrats support Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
    20% support Osama Bin Laden
    15% support Hugo Chavez!


  118. jb Says:

    Scooter, How come YOU are calling Judicial Review and making up this paranoid term “Judicial Activism”. If you personally condemn a GOOD LAW that has passed the Review process, then the burden of legislation is upon you. Of course any law passed must pass review to make sure it is constitutional. Remember the Constitution and the Bill of Rights are the basis for our system. Are you being willfully ignorant?


  119. gummitch Says:

    Nothing brings out irrational troll behavior (from frankie j, mr pee, and wormsmakemedragmybottomacrosstherug) like a discussion of gay sex between men. They inevitably end up foaming and barking at the sky.

    Seek professional help, boys. According to the “christians”, homosexuality can be cured. Try not to freak out.


  120. Hugo Chavez Says:

    Why do Democats support Iran?


  121. alp3 Says:

    please… please master p, embrace yer homosexuality…


  122. scooter Says:

    Scoots, please take your medication. This is gibberish.

    If you think I’m giving up redheads just because you experimented too much with your buddies, you have another think coming.

    Comment by gummitch

    Nice to see your defending the REDHEADS….
    now please open your HEART and extend the same to pedophiles, bestials, polygamists, incests,
    AND hockey players named RALPH….


  123. Hugo Chavez Says:

    gummitch,
    What do you have to say about TP kying about support for Gay Marriage?


  124. Hugo Chavez Says:

    ronjazz,
    You’re a bum!


  125. scooter Says:

    please… please master p, embrace yer homosexuality…

    Comment by alp3

    I’m sure he will be on board as soon as you embrace yer pederophilia…


  126. alp3 Says:

    you still got hocky, squeak. fight teh good fight!


  127. Osama Bin Laden (R-Camp David) Says:

    I agree with scooter, he is a man after my own heart. The United States cannot be a proper theocracy without the bigotry and discrimination of fundamentalists such as I and my radical christian friends, like scooter. If America allows the homosexuals to marry and achieve the same rights as the normal people, then it is all the proof we need to declare Fatwah and Jihad! Only by adhereing to our fundamentalist beliefs can you be clean and worthy. Listen to scooter, he knows of what he speaks. All praise to Allah and GeorgeBush.


  128. alp3 Says:

    ohhhhhhhhh, master p, what’s it gonna be, tappin yer toes for all humanitee?


  129. Mahmod Ahmadinejad (D-New York) Says:

    I want vote thank all for your support of my candidacy!
    When I become President of America, Jews and Christians will be put in their place!
    Thank you!


  130. ronjazz Says:

    Fukc YOU, muslim!!!

    Comment by Master P — September 6, 2007 @ 12:22 am

    meth running out, tweaker? you do crash like NASCAR, I must say.


  131. scooter Says:

    My apologies to all those that ASSUME i’m equating the actions of HOMOSEXUALS with that of pedophiles, bestials, incests, polygamists, etc…

    I’m only comparing the PROCESS where they all become RIGHTS.

    To assume they are the same would be a derogatory statement to all RIGHTS other than GAYS due to the patience the others are currently exhibiting to get thier rights recognized.
    What is it??? Patience is a virtue.


  132. scooter Says:

    Do you guys think the CIVIL RIGHTS ACT can also be interpreted to mean that I can piss on YOUR grass?

    I mean if you can get GAY RIGHTS from it why not the PISS on GRASS thing.


  133. Steve Says:

    Hahaha. You think that this audience proves something? Polls show that a majority even in New Hampshire don’t want gay marriage legal. Don’t kid yourself. Brownback holds the majority viewpoint, but I don’t support him for President.


  134. alp3 Says:

    Patience is a virtue.

    bring it up with da rabbit, squeak. tricks are for kids?


  135. jb Says:

    Scooter, Piss on your own grass if you must.


  136. scooter Says:

    I hope Muslims unite and destroy America!
    I hope Iran nukes Israel and causes a 2nd holocaust!
    Death to Christians!
    Death to Jews!

    Comment by ronjazz

    c’mon RON,,,, we all know that ISLAM is a religion of PEACE that in it’s pure form gives liberty to others. When you say these things it makes people JADED towards ISLAM… People get this way because of what YOU SAY,,, not the fact that a very large % of ISLAM really does this.

    So stop it… man,,,, YOU and not ISLAM itself is the reason that people are JADED on it…


  137. Buck Fush Says:

    Marriage is a legal and religious issue, we need not be involved in who others want to marry, none of our business. Banning is simple bigotry….we are all equal under the law, what part to the repukian tards not get that.


  138. alp3 Says:

    I know that you get a bit o’ over excited when you see a nakid man in teh shower stalls, squeak. does that make me unpatriotic?

    squeak?


  139. scooter Says:

    Scooter, Piss on your own grass if you must.

    Comment by jb

    NOPE,,,, I must shove it in your face,,,, HEY,,,
    Will you come to the inaugural (pissers on others lawns) PRIDE PARADE?
    We really need your support and hope that society will become more accepting of US…

    Also,,, don’t EVEN think you can PISS on mine…
    Whats good for the GOOSE is definitely not good for the GANDER,,, in this case.


  140. alp3 Says:

    ,,,,,,,,,,,, say wha? squeak? what are you dreamin’ about shoving in yer face?


  141. jb Says:

    Against gay marriage …don’t marry one. against abortion…don’t have one. Stop pushing your ideology on me…take responsibility for yourself and shut the F up.


  142. wired2aliens Says:

    So we are organizing a collective ‘Piss On The Whitehouse Lawn’?


  143. loudandproud Says:

    “Gay Marriage”, here we go again….

    In my opinion, this issue does not even belong in the Presidential debate. It should be decided at the State level!

    Moreover, is it possible for those who support “Gay Marriage” rights, to not label those of us who do not support “Gay Marriage” rights as bigots and homophobes! Quite frankly, it’s tiresome, naive, and presumptuous!

    It’s how we feel, and we have that right! Just as those of you who do not support the “War in Iraq” as being labeled UnPatriotic! It’s how you feel, and you have that right!

    In addition, and I’ve posted in enough forums to come to this simple realization, that people who post in these forums are very opinionated and head strong and it makes it extremely difficult to persuade one to your point of view! If you’re lucky, maybe you can come to a compromise!

    In closing, I would just like to add that I feel there are far more pressing and life threatening issues facing us right now. And the “Gay Marriage” rights, in my opinion is not one of them….

    And to finally play off of what the flamboyant James Carville so rightly put it during President Clintons re-election campaign back in 1996, “It’s the Economy Stupid”, well, in the next election it’s going to be “the Iraq War/War on Terror” stupid…

    loudandproud


  144. scooter Says:

    I know that you get a bit o’ over excited when you see a nakid man in teh shower stalls, squeak. does that make me unpatriotic?

    squeak?

    Comment by alp3

    How about a NAKED child (or very young adult to some).
    You could also try your sister.
    Or the neighbors GREAT DANE.
    How about a polygamous 3some?
    Don’t even get me started about REDS….

    Would any and all of those make YOU unpatriotic?


  145. jb Says:

    Gays are not pissing on your lawn. You are pissing on theirs.


  146. jb Says:

    #

    So we are organizing a collective ‘Piss On The Whitehouse Lawn’?

    Comment by wired2aliens — September 6, 2007 @ 12:41 am

    The chief resident certainly has it coming.


  147. alp3 Says:

    hey squeak, what you imagine to be in yer showa is no business of mine.

    although, you do seem to be the right man for the job.


  148. scooter Says:

    So we are organizing a collective ‘Piss On The Whitehouse Lawn’?

    Comment by wired2aliens

    NO silly,,,, the oppressed group (piss on others lawns) is to be set up as an oppressed minority,, (like GAYS) and thus have JUDGES change society laws for US.

    YEA,,,,, As for pissing on the WHITEHOUSE lawn,,, I suggest we hold it in case HILLARY gets in there.


  149. darla Says:

    sounds like there were more cheers than boos

    unfortunately


  150. ronjazz Says:

    scooter, are you crashing with p? did your meth run out as well? you are one unhinged moonbat. I’m very grateful the GOP has finally imploded if you’re a representative of that sick, deluded, ignorant group of backwards bigots and closet-cases. Denying Americans their Constitutional freedoms, what have you become? have you joined Al Qaeda, or the Klan? Must be the Klan, Al Qaeda has standards.


  151. jb Says:

    Comment by Master P — September 6, 2007 @ 12:44 am
    Lot of empty space in that post….like your brain.


  152. scooter Says:

    hey squeak, what you imagine to be in yer showa is no business of mine.

    although, you do seem to be the right man for the job.

    Comment by alp3

    YES,,,,, I’m free,,, now where did the neighbors CAT run off to.


  153. alp3 Says:

    so gays piss on yer lawn, squeak? oh my, now i see yer dilemma!

    so many choices! tis confusing to such a man…


  154. ronjazz Says:

    YEA,,,,, As for pissing on the WHITEHOUSE lawn,,, I suggest we hold it in case HILLARY gets in there.

    Comment by scooter — September 6, 2007 @ 12:45 am

    Good idea. she’ll need some time to clean up George and KKKarls turds.

    p has run out of Sterno to drink, it looks like. complete meltdown. Good job, toasterhead, I think you’ve finished him off.


  155. wired2aliens Says:

    Oh, I get it… so if I want to piss on other peoples’ lawns all I have to do is ring up my local ACTIVIST JUDGE and get him to strike down any laws against it?


  156. scooter Says:

    scooter, are you crashing with p? did your meth run out as well? you are one unhinged moonbat. I’m very grateful the GOP has finally imploded if you’re a representative of that sick, deluded, ignorant group of backwards bigots and closet-cases. Denying Americans their Constitutional freedoms, what have you become? have you joined Al Qaeda, or the Klan? Must be the Klan, Al Qaeda has standards.

    Comment by ronjazz

    RON,,, this reply is so SMART and INTELLIGENT,,, so full of examples that show me HOW i’m wrong that I have absolutely no response to it….
    WOWWWW,,,, we are all in the presence of greatness here folks.


  157. alp3 Says:

    scoot! i want to know more about teh pissin’

    it seems to be all you little cons can do!

    ew!


  158. scooter Says:

    Oh, I get it… so if I want to piss on other peoples’ lawns all I have to do is ring up my local ACTIVIST JUDGE and get him to strike down any laws against it?

    Comment by wired2aliens

    NO silly,,, A judge will recognize YOU as an oppressed MINORITY under the CIVIL RIGHTS ACT of 1965 (like gays). Then you can enjoy PISSING on others at will,,,, AND as a bonus you can change other LAWS as well. Whatever a JUDGE claims your MINORITY group is…


  159. Jackie Says:

    Senator Craig will now vote for gay rights as he’s seen first hand how people are treated. The hate his GOP party shows has been shown to him and they stabbed him in the back after 27 years of loyalty. If he is or isn’t gay he was treated like trash by his own party. Senator Specter came out to support him later but not one of his so called friends would speak up for him. I noticed Vitter had the hold gang of GOP supporting him with his actions of paying for prostitutes over many years. Now we see that if a Senator is gay it’s a crime but if he pays for prostitutes or threatens peoples lives or even has an open affair like the President and Connie Rice there’s no problem.


  160. Buck Fush Says:

    Wow, I would hate to be that Scooter idiot…what a freaking sick individual….wow, all I can is wow what an idiot….you’re sick, sick, sick scooter. Very, very, very sick.


  161. alp3 Says:

    more talk of teh pissin’ from teh scootah!

    eagley sneagaly snargaly snorf
    look out san francisco there is teh
    cons just a pissin’ offa da wharf.

    toodalz!


  162. angelique Says:

    A true intelligent Americans believe the nation should have a constitutional
    amendment banning gay marriage.
    I support Sen.Sam Brownback proposal.


  163. jb Says:

    Whatever a JUDGE claims your MINORITY group is…
    You christos have too many rights already….need to be castrated after the birth of your second child.


  164. scooter Says:

    scoot! i want to know more about teh pissin’

    it seems to be all you little cons can do!

    ew!

    Comment by alp3

    WELL,,,, first of all you must get the MEDIA to work on society at large to make it POSSIBLE that PISSIN on others is possible. Next you get the PSYCHIATRISTS to change your behaivor from mentally unbalanced to balanced (this will be backed up with studies that have a predetermined result). Don’t forget to claim that you are BORN THAT WAY and cannot change. Finally, concentrate on a JUDGE who may have a CLOSET pissing habit himself and go for GOLD BABY….

    I hope this helps


  165. alp3 Says:

    i don’t need no silly doctas to tell me that you love teh pissin’ silly.

    you do just fine.


  166. jb Says:

    True intelligent Americans support banning christians from bearing children.


  167. wired2aliens Says:

    Oh gee was I disallusioned, I thought I have to go piss on someone’s lawn, be arrested, spend time in jail, spend big bucks on a lawyer and appeal my case all the way to the supreme court in order to get the law itself judged as unconstitutional.

    But in reality all I have to do is carry around a printout of the CIVIL RIGHTS ACT of 1965 and any judge will recognize me as a MINORITY?


  168. scooter Says:

    Wow, I would hate to be that Scooter idiot…what a freaking sick individual….wow, all I can is wow what an idiot….you’re sick, sick, sick scooter. Very, very, very sick.

    Comment by Buck Fush

    Hey BUCK,,, please rewind yourself 40 years ago and THINK how your counterpart would say the same thing about YOU and GAY RIGHTS.

    Kinda IRONIC ehhh


  169. alp3 Says:

    teh irony is your love of teh peein’ little scootah man.

    embrace yer mornin’ wood… learn to love it!

    little buddy!


  170. scooter Says:

    Oh gee was I disallusioned, I thought I have to go piss on someone’s lawn, be arrested, spend time in jail, spend big bucks on a lawyer and appeal my case all the way to the supreme court in order to get the law itself judged as unconstitutional.

    But in reality all I have to do is carry around a printout of the CIVIL RIGHTS ACT of 1965 and any judge will recognize me as a MINORITY?

    Comment by wired2aliens

    No you got the ACLU and a whole slew of PISSERS that look really sad. And you got to pick and choose,,, don’t go at the SUPREME court right away as there are certainly much easier ones first,,, LIKE MASSACHUSETTS.