Comments on: Judge ’scolds’ Bush administration on spying secrecy. http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/05/judge-scolds-bush-administration-on-spying-secrecy/ Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:04:02 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: JakeIsATerrorist http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/05/judge-scolds-bush-administration-on-spying-secrecy/comment-page-1/#comment-4060215 JakeIsATerrorist Wed, 05 Sep 2007 22:26:55 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/09/05/judge-scolds-bush-administration-on-spying-secrecy/#comment-4060215 <em>While the judge agreed that the documents could not be released, he criticized the government’s reasons for holding them back “Could not” doesn’t sound like “MUST” to me. Comment by r — September 5, 2007 @ 4:50 pm</em> Actually the judge was clear that the MUST release those they don't have a LEGITIMATE claim to the secrecy of. Read the order, dolt. While the judge agreed that the documents could not be released, he criticized the government’s reasons for holding them back
“Could not” doesn’t sound like “MUST” to me.
Comment by r — September 5, 2007 @ 4:50 pm

Actually the judge was clear that the MUST release those they don’t have a LEGITIMATE claim to the secrecy of. Read the order, dolt.

]]> By: JakeIsATerrorist http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/05/judge-scolds-bush-administration-on-spying-secrecy/comment-page-1/#comment-4060211 JakeIsATerrorist Wed, 05 Sep 2007 22:24:37 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/09/05/judge-scolds-bush-administration-on-spying-secrecy/#comment-4060211 <em>For the record, I read the entire article and the Judge’s order — I also “comprehend” that a LIST of documents is not the same thing as the DOCUMENT itself — veritas claimed above that DoJ “MUST release the documents - what don’t you get about that statement, JakeMoron?” Comment by Jake D. — September 5, 2007 @ 5:24 pm</em> For the record this contradicts your previous assertion, thereby proving that you're a retard. You're welcome for me pointing out you were wrong though! Good thing Clinton appointed a COMPETENT and THOROUGH judicious individual who's NOTHING like you and your federalist loser friends! For the record, I read the entire article and the Judge’s order — I also “comprehend” that a LIST of documents is not the same thing as the DOCUMENT itself — veritas claimed above that DoJ “MUST release the documents – what don’t you get about that statement, JakeMoron?” Comment by Jake D. — September 5, 2007 @ 5:24 pm

For the record this contradicts your previous assertion, thereby proving that you’re a retard. You’re welcome for me pointing out you were wrong though! Good thing Clinton appointed a COMPETENT and THOROUGH judicious individual who’s NOTHING like you and your federalist loser friends!

]]> By: DA http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/05/judge-scolds-bush-administration-on-spying-secrecy/comment-page-1/#comment-4060199 DA Wed, 05 Sep 2007 22:17:20 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/09/05/judge-scolds-bush-administration-on-spying-secrecy/#comment-4060199 "Scolds" ... B.F.D. Heck, that never worked when his Momma did it. But then maybe she never did, and THAT's the problem. Or, maybe ... nah, never-mind. How about IMPEACHING the scumbag! “Scolds” … B.F.D. Heck, that never worked when his Momma did it. But then maybe she never did, and THAT’s the problem. Or, maybe … nah, never-mind. How about IMPEACHING the scumbag!

]]> By: Jake D. http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/05/judge-scolds-bush-administration-on-spying-secrecy/comment-page-1/#comment-4060093 Jake D. Wed, 05 Sep 2007 21:24:45 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/09/05/judge-scolds-bush-administration-on-spying-secrecy/#comment-4060093 For the record, I read the entire article and the Judge's order -- I also "comprehend" that a LIST of documents is not the same thing as the DOCUMENT itself -- veritas claimed above that DoJ "MUST release the documents - what don’t you get about that statement, JakeMoron?" For the record, I read the entire article and the Judge’s order — I also “comprehend” that a LIST of documents is not the same thing as the DOCUMENT itself — veritas claimed above that DoJ “MUST release the documents – what don’t you get about that statement, JakeMoron?”

]]> By: dlet http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/05/judge-scolds-bush-administration-on-spying-secrecy/comment-page-1/#comment-4060082 dlet Wed, 05 Sep 2007 21:20:43 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/09/05/judge-scolds-bush-administration-on-spying-secrecy/#comment-4060082 Hey r and Jake, If you actually read the article, and comprhend it, "must" does come up with regards to releasing documents. Just thought you would like to know that.....I mean you seem to be interested in facts and all... Kennedy agreed with the Justice Department that many records should not be turned over, either because they were classified or because they were drafts of documents not covered by public records laws. In other instances, Kennedy said the Justice Department must release a list of its documents and explain why each cannot be released. Kennedy had particularly strong words for the FBI, whose response he called "wholly inadequate." Hey r and Jake,

If you actually read the article, and comprhend it, “must” does come up with regards to releasing documents. Just thought you would like to know that…..I mean you seem to be interested in facts and all…

Kennedy agreed with the Justice Department that many records should not be turned over, either because they were classified or because they were drafts of documents not covered by public records laws.

In other instances, Kennedy said the Justice Department must release a list of its documents and explain why each cannot be released. Kennedy had particularly strong words for the FBI, whose response he called “wholly inadequate.”

]]> By: katy http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/05/judge-scolds-bush-administration-on-spying-secrecy/comment-page-1/#comment-4060081 katy Wed, 05 Sep 2007 21:20:04 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/09/05/judge-scolds-bush-administration-on-spying-secrecy/#comment-4060081 * <em><strong>How Orwellian! New documents reveal that British intelligence monitored George Orwell.</strong> -randi http://books.guardian.co.uk/news/articles/0,,2161853,00.html</em> . *
How Orwellian! New documents reveal that British intelligence monitored George Orwell. -randi

http://books.guardian.co.uk/news/articles/0,,2161853,00.html
.

]]> By: dlet http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/05/judge-scolds-bush-administration-on-spying-secrecy/comment-page-1/#comment-4060076 dlet Wed, 05 Sep 2007 21:17:22 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/09/05/judge-scolds-bush-administration-on-spying-secrecy/#comment-4060076 Now that they have to release a specific list of documents that they want to be kept secret and have to give specific reasons why each document deserves that status I can't wait to see the amount that is rejected for having no basis to be kept hidden. Many documents probably have titles like "Democrat Political Action Group", "Amish Quilting Bee/Peace Mothers", "San Francisco Day Care Center/Future Democratic voters", etc. Now that they have to release a specific list of documents that they want to be kept secret and have to give specific reasons why each document deserves that status I can’t wait to see the amount that is rejected for having no basis to be kept hidden. Many documents probably have titles like “Democrat Political Action Group”, “Amish Quilting Bee/Peace Mothers”, “San Francisco Day Care Center/Future Democratic voters”, etc.

]]> By: Jake D. http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/05/judge-scolds-bush-administration-on-spying-secrecy/comment-page-1/#comment-4060015 Jake D. Wed, 05 Sep 2007 20:57:00 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/09/05/judge-scolds-bush-administration-on-spying-secrecy/#comment-4060015 "r": You must be a "troll" -- stop pointing out the facts to them!!! “r”:

You must be a “troll” — stop pointing out the facts to them!!!

]]> By: Peter C http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/05/judge-scolds-bush-administration-on-spying-secrecy/comment-page-1/#comment-4059993 Peter C Wed, 05 Sep 2007 20:52:25 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/09/05/judge-scolds-bush-administration-on-spying-secrecy/#comment-4059993 Again, notice how our active our troll characters are in a thread which is threatening to this regime's fundamental legitimacy. The more childish, the better. They just hope we'll all go away. Again, notice how our active our troll characters are in a thread which is threatening to this regime’s fundamental legitimacy. The more childish, the better. They just hope we’ll all go away.

]]> By: r http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/05/judge-scolds-bush-administration-on-spying-secrecy/comment-page-1/#comment-4059981 r Wed, 05 Sep 2007 20:50:18 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/09/05/judge-scolds-bush-administration-on-spying-secrecy/#comment-4059981 Kennedy says Justice Department MUST release the documents - what don’t you get about that statement, JakeMoron? Comment by veritas — September 5, 2007 @ 4:39 pm While the judge agreed that the documents could not be released, he criticized the government’s reasons for holding them back "Could not" doesn't sound like "MUST" to me. Kennedy says Justice Department MUST release the documents – what don’t you get about that statement, JakeMoron?

Comment by veritas — September 5, 2007 @ 4:39 pm

While the judge agreed that the documents could not be released, he criticized the government’s reasons for holding them back

“Could not” doesn’t sound like “MUST” to me.

]]> By: Jake D. http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/05/judge-scolds-bush-administration-on-spying-secrecy/comment-page-1/#comment-4059973 Jake D. Wed, 05 Sep 2007 20:47:02 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/09/05/judge-scolds-bush-administration-on-spying-secrecy/#comment-4059973 Good one, TripMaster SandMonkey! Good one, TripMaster SandMonkey!

]]> By: Jake D. http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/05/judge-scolds-bush-administration-on-spying-secrecy/comment-page-1/#comment-4059969 Jake D. Wed, 05 Sep 2007 20:44:14 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/09/05/judge-scolds-bush-administration-on-spying-secrecy/#comment-4059969 And, Nancy Pelosi took impeachment OFF THE TABLE!!! And, Nancy Pelosi took impeachment OFF THE TABLE!!!

]]> By: Jake D. http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/05/judge-scolds-bush-administration-on-spying-secrecy/comment-page-1/#comment-4059966 Jake D. Wed, 05 Sep 2007 20:42:21 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/09/05/judge-scolds-bush-administration-on-spying-secrecy/#comment-4059966 For the record, I am not really an attorney. I'm not a Korean War veteran, either. Uh-oh... I pooped my pants again. For the record, I am not really an attorney. I’m not a Korean War veteran, either.

Uh-oh… I pooped my pants again.

]]> By: JakeIsATerrorist http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/05/judge-scolds-bush-administration-on-spying-secrecy/comment-page-1/#comment-4059964 JakeIsATerrorist Wed, 05 Sep 2007 20:41:17 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/09/05/judge-scolds-bush-administration-on-spying-secrecy/#comment-4059964 <em>He “believes in protecting the Constitution” so much that he did NOT order the documents released . . . LOL!!! Comment by Jake D. — September 5, 2007 @ 4:36 pm</em> You've prematurely judicated again, dumbass. Re-read the order, he demands they explain each reason individually and THEN he'll rule on whether there is a legitimate reason any should remain secret. That's what a REASONABLE judge does, and why a retard like you is unsuited to ever hold a gavel, whether in a mensroom or courtroom! He “believes in protecting the Constitution” so much that he did NOT order the documents released . . . LOL!!!
Comment by Jake D. — September 5, 2007 @ 4:36 pm

You’ve prematurely judicated again, dumbass. Re-read the order, he demands they explain each reason individually and THEN he’ll rule on whether there is a legitimate reason any should remain secret. That’s what a REASONABLE judge does, and why a retard like you is unsuited to ever hold a gavel, whether in a mensroom or courtroom!

]]> By: Guido, OBGYN, Lover http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/05/judge-scolds-bush-administration-on-spying-secrecy/comment-page-1/#comment-4059962 Guido, OBGYN, Lover Wed, 05 Sep 2007 20:39:48 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/09/05/judge-scolds-bush-administration-on-spying-secrecy/#comment-4059962 If we know anything about the Republican party it is that they like to spy on Americans. They will never stop trying to spy on Americans. They feel they have complete authority to spy on Americans. They will lie about this and tell you that they don't. The Republican party wants to know everything about each and every American and they do not respect privacy or the rule of law. If we know anything about the Republican party it is that they like to spy on Americans.

They will never stop trying to spy on Americans.

They feel they have complete authority to spy on Americans.

They will lie about this and tell you that they don’t.

The Republican party wants to know everything about each and every American and they do not respect privacy or the rule of law.

]]> By: veritas http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/05/judge-scolds-bush-administration-on-spying-secrecy/comment-page-1/#comment-4059961 veritas Wed, 05 Sep 2007 20:39:44 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/09/05/judge-scolds-bush-administration-on-spying-secrecy/#comment-4059961 Perhaps Kennedy will be the ONE who takes down this entire administration of smoke & mirrors, high crimes and criminal chicanery?? Perhaps Kennedy will be the ONE who takes down this entire administration of smoke & mirrors, high crimes and criminal chicanery??

]]> By: veritas http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/05/judge-scolds-bush-administration-on-spying-secrecy/comment-page-1/#comment-4059958 veritas Wed, 05 Sep 2007 20:39:09 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/09/05/judge-scolds-bush-administration-on-spying-secrecy/#comment-4059958 Kennedy says Justice Department MUST release the documents - what don't you get about that statement, JakeMoron? Kennedy says Justice Department MUST release the documents – what don’t you get about that statement, JakeMoron?

]]> By: JakeIsATerrorist http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/05/judge-scolds-bush-administration-on-spying-secrecy/comment-page-1/#comment-4059955 JakeIsATerrorist Wed, 05 Sep 2007 20:38:30 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/09/05/judge-scolds-bush-administration-on-spying-secrecy/#comment-4059955 <em>So, bottom line, the documents aren’t released, right? Go ahead and enforce that “scolding” then, Judge . . . Comment by Jake D. — September 5, 2007 @ 4:26 pm</em> Self righteous prick attorneys like yourself are the reasons that Judges have to scold so much. Your disrespect for the law is exactly what I expect from a lawless terrorist like you Jake D. Watch out with that WIDE STANCE, we can see how little your gavel is from here! So, bottom line, the documents aren’t released, right? Go ahead and enforce that “scolding” then, Judge . . .
Comment by Jake D. — September 5, 2007 @ 4:26 pm

Self righteous prick attorneys like yourself are the reasons that Judges have to scold so much. Your disrespect for the law is exactly what I expect from a lawless terrorist like you Jake D. Watch out with that WIDE STANCE, we can see how little your gavel is from here!

]]> By: Peter C http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/05/judge-scolds-bush-administration-on-spying-secrecy/comment-page-1/#comment-4059954 Peter C Wed, 05 Sep 2007 20:38:24 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/09/05/judge-scolds-bush-administration-on-spying-secrecy/#comment-4059954 Again, the Bush Administration refuses to be bound by the law. There is only one recourse: Impeachment. How many more times do Federal Judges need to point out instances of this administration's lawlessness before Congress acts? If our government is above the law, we don't live in a democracy. Again, the Bush Administration refuses to be bound by the law.

There is only one recourse: Impeachment.

How many more times do Federal Judges need to point out instances of this administration’s lawlessness before Congress acts?

If our government is above the law, we don’t live in a democracy.

]]> By: Jake D. http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/05/judge-scolds-bush-administration-on-spying-secrecy/comment-page-1/#comment-4059953 Jake D. Wed, 05 Sep 2007 20:38:22 +0000 http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/09/05/judge-scolds-bush-administration-on-spying-secrecy/#comment-4059953 i make peepee i make peepee

]]>