Reporters sure seemed to care about this issue months ago, and over the issues of Iraq which is all ‘ole Dana Perino wanted to talk about:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=oSPnNeQwhP0

If a dem wins the presidency, will hse be able to look at these emails and all of the other documents from the Bush regime? Can they bring charges against anyone if documents show illegal actions? What if there’s a “smoking gun” document from Cheney saying “I know there are no WMD and SH wasn’t supporting/working with AQ and that he had nothing to do w/9/11.” Can that be used to bring war crimes charges? What about details of his Energy Policy meetings? Or of the no-bid KBR contracts? If there’re docs showing that money was subverted from needed war supplies (e.g. body and vehicle armor) to KBR inflated contracts, I would consider that to be the act of an enemy combatant. And once that’s done, their fate is at the whim of, say, Hillary’s unitary executive power.

If any of these things are possible then they will do anything to keep a democrat out of the WH. The stakes will just too high. I don’t think there’s any possibility they can destroy all of their incriminating documents in time.

–
E Pleb Neesta
GODISNOWHERE
If HPV vaccination promotes promiscuity, then confession promotes sin.

The enemies are not “Lefties”. The enemies, being Islamic extremists, are CONSERVATIVES. Religious fundamentalists. Hard-Righties.

The people we support in Iran, for instance, are LIBERAL.

Comment by Jake D. — September 10, 2007 @ 3:50 pm

Since we all KNOW YOU as a FACIST, REICH-WING cHeArLeAdEr….should we take your comment as a threat to Cindy Sheehan? I can’t think of any other interpretation?

You may have just committed a crime!!

Right.. this is a pretty pathethic attempt to analogize a few DUPLICATES
of documents to original copies of millions of emails. Try again troll.

>How about Bush promises to release them after the
> next election ala Hillary Clinton?

Difference is Hillary has no legal obligation to either retain or release those documents. The stuff Bush is stonewalling is mandated to be retained by the Presidential Records act. And its being mandated by subpeana to be released. And if you wernt so stupid, you’d know that even if you can validly prevent a document from being released by claiming some sort of privledge, you have to provide the judge and party seeking disclosure a list of documents you witholding, and a basic description of said documents, and your justification for withholding them. The white house has done NONE of these things which are required prerequisites for claiming a document is privledged. They are thus in violation of the law, which of course means nothing to them..

Try again trolls

Jake D Fake, I see you are still taking those Stupid Pills, and you have been selling them to Dean CT (CT_V1 in disguise)

Right.. this is a pretty pathethic attempt to analogize a few DUPLICATES
of documents to original copies of millions of emails. Try again troll.

>How about Bush promises to release them after the
> next election ala Hillary Clinton?

Difference is Hillary has no legal obligation to either retain or release those documents. The stuff Bush is stonewalling is mandated to be retained by the Presidential Records act. And its being mandated by subpeana to be released. And if you wernt so stupid, you’d know that even if you can validly prevent a document from being released by claiming some sort of privledge, you have to provide the judge and party seeking disclosure a list of documents you witholding, and a basic description of said documents, and your justification for withholding them. The white house has done NONE of these things which are required prerequisites for claiming a document is privledged. They are thus in violation of the law, which of course means nothing to them..

Try again trolls…