Comment by WC — September 17, 2007 @ 8:07 pm

“Next, Clinton didn’t drag the nation through the scandal…”

No, Clinton did by bald face lying on national TV… Please don’t try to make this pussy into a victim.

“…compared to an SOB that lied about a threat that did not exist.”

Provide proof that Bush lied about the WMD threat. BTW why did Clinton throughout the 1990s call for regime change in Iraq?

1). First, it’s “through,” not “threw.”

2). Next, Clinton didn’t drag the nation through the scandal, the Republics did, going so far as to post the salacious details on the Internet for all (including school-aged children) to see and read. After countless investigations into his presidency, THIS is all that they could prove and this is the only thing they could get on him that they hoped would bring him down.

3). The Clinton/Lewinsky affair was between two consenting ADULTS.

4). I doubt you’d be so forthcoming if you had an affair on your wife or girlfriend or whomever if you were confronted about it.

5). You want to talk about lies? How about Bush telling the world that Iraq had WMDs and a mushroom cloud was just around the corner while at the same time pulling the WMD inspectors out of Iraq and before they had to finish their jobs and claiming that Saddam kicked them out? Remember Rummy saying in 2003 that “we know where the WMDs are” and 3 years later saying that he didn’t say that?????

I’d much rather have a president lie about a sexual affair as compared to an SOB that lied about a threat that did not exist (Iraq/Saddam) (I have quotes from Powell and Rice that confirm this, but I doubt you’d be interested because it would make you look like an idiot) and then commit this country to an endless “war.”

Bush: “May I go to the bathroom?”

Fox: “Ahhh…my little taco. You know better than to ask such a question.”

Jeez…who hasn’t written a book?

George: “I do.”
Vicente: “And you will again”

Comment by Juan C — September 17, 2007 @ 3:04 pm

Thank you very much – I appreciate it!

I’ve been lazy about updating today but maybe later.

Sort of like the petulant child who doesn’t understand, but stomps her feet and shrieks ad nauseum…

“Politics is not a bad profession. If you succeed there are many rewards, if you disgrace yourself you can always write a book.” – Ronald Reagan.

Looks like Fox took the latter route, after he dumped his failures on us, the tax-paying U.S. citizens.

Couldnt tell. At least Fox was intelligent enough to stop the planning of the Texcoco airport. But, of course, he retaliate in Atenco with the beatings and the rapings.

I’m laughing at the superior intellect

Comment by TripMaster Monkey — September 17, 2007 @ 2:51 pm

Perhaps he meant “ad homonym” attack. Something that sounds like an ad hominem attack but is written differently.

Neither did anyone else except those that were in control and knew he would be a quality puppet.

Luis M can only post ad hominen attacks on those who don’t agree with him. Typical reaction of an ignorant person who is unable to meaningfully engage those with superior intellect.

First of all, it’s “ad hominem”.

Second, pointing out your ignorance of the fact that Vicente Fox hasn’t been the President of Mexico for over a year is hardly an “ad hominem” attack.

“Superior intellect”, indeed…