Malkin: Sally Field Is The Type Of Mom Who ‘Buys Her Teenager Beer And Condoms On Prom Night’
Malkin: Sally Field Is The Type Of Mom Who ‘Buys Her Teenager Beer And Condoms On Prom Night’
Since actress Sally Field won an Emmy and spoke out against the Iraq war in her acceptance speech, the right wing has been on the attack. In addition to Fox censoring her speech, conservatives continue to criticize Field for speaking out.
Taking the slander to a very personal level, right-wing blogger Michelle Malkin attacked Field’s parenting skills with a column in the National Review entitled “Sally Field Does Not Speak For Me.” In it, she writes:
Sally Field is the mom who looks the other way when the brat on the elementary-school slide pushes your son to the ground or throws dirt in your daughter’s face.
She’s the mom who holds her tongue at the mall when thugs spew profanities and make crude gestures in front of her brood.
She’s the mom who tells her child never to point out when a teacher gets her facts wrong.
She’s the mom who buys her teenager beer, condoms, and a hotel room on prom night, because she’d rather give in than assert her parental authority and do battle.
Fox and Friends hosted Malkin this morning to promote her hate-filled column. On the show, Malkin — a mother herself — posited her theory of parenting: “motherhood should bring a ferocity, and dare I say, make us more violent.”
Watch it:
Fox was overjoyed to have Malkin on the air. Co-host Gretchen Carlson said Malkin’s “best line in the article” was about the condoms and beer. Malkin responded, “as a Mom, I know, I’ve dealt with moms like [Fields], who look the other way.”
After a few more exchanges of laughter and contempt, co-host Steve Doocy closed the segment stating, “Hollywood probably thinks you are dangerous and offensive.” So do many others.
Sort Comments By: Top Rated | Date
You’re an obnoxious pig, Ms. Malkin. My kids went to school with Sally Fields’ kids and I know them and her.
September 20th, 2007 at 2:43 pmGee, I wonder if the Republicans in Congress are going to ask to have Malkin censored for her hateful comments about Sally Field?
September 20th, 2007 at 2:43 pmI hope she takes over Tony Snow’s job. This is just the person we want to explain the republican viewpoint to America.
September 20th, 2007 at 2:44 pmIs there any way to destroy the Fox studios from space with a giant gamma ray emitter or repulsor ray or something?
September 20th, 2007 at 2:45 pmThe world is going crazy. Astonishing.
September 20th, 2007 at 2:45 pmSally should slap her with a slander or libel suit immediately. And the National Review should be embarrassed to be publishing such obvious drivel; the magazine used to at least maintain a facade of intellectual honesty but commentary like this is the same sort of “schoolyard” dribble often oozing out from under Ann Coulter.
September 20th, 2007 at 2:45 pms there any way to destroy the Fox studios from space with a giant gamma ray emitter or repulsor ray or something?
Comment by norbizness — September 20, 2007 @ 2:45 pm
#
No need. They are destroying themselves.
September 20th, 2007 at 2:46 pmMalkin is an idiot.
September 20th, 2007 at 2:46 pmBoy, I hope Sally sues that poisonous little b!tch over this…this is way beyond the pale.
September 20th, 2007 at 2:47 pmMichelle is the kind of Mom who’s not even a Mom, and ought to keep her little Shih-tzu mouth shut about anyone who is.
September 20th, 2007 at 2:48 pmAs much as right wing blow hards and demogouges like Malkin should just be ignored, it’s impossible in this day and age to just sit back and let them detroy people’s character. So, I say Sally Fields needs to use this as a springboard to get many, many other celebrities on the wagon to start rebutting these hatemongers. If these people truly only occupy about 25-30% of the political spectrum, they should be pub;licly and repeatedly rebutted and called out for what they are.
September 20th, 2007 at 2:48 pmShe’s the mom who holds her tongue at the mall when thugs spew profanities and make crude gestures in front of her brood.
——————————————————————————–
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
And what would you do if that someone was me , Michelle Mentalcase ?
Believe your retarded and ridiculously stupid FAUX Comedy Channel rants at me in public would do anything besides elicit anything besides a hearty laugh in your ignorant catcher’s mitt-like face ?
============================================
She’s the mom who tells her child never to point out when a teacher gets her facts wrong.
——————————————————————————–
Yeah , as opposed to calling those who point out the outright lies and inaccuracies of a dishonest president and his horseshit administration and political party “traitors” , and consider yourselves justified and righteous.
What a moronic and stupid ass this dopey broad is ; she gives women a bad name and has nothing relevant nor intelligent to contribute……….
September 20th, 2007 at 2:49 pmLOL remember when John Kerry’s kids were well behaved, and Bush’s kids were getting caught drinking while underage in seedy bars in Texas. Please Mrs. Malkin, leave you hatred and vitriol at the door.
I wonder if Malkin would be okay with her kids joining the army to go fight in Iraq?
September 20th, 2007 at 2:50 pmUnfortunately for us, Michelle’s grandma didn’t buy her daughter condoms on prom night. Must have been a lot of beer though…
September 20th, 2007 at 2:51 pmC’mon Sally, go Sybil on her ass!
September 20th, 2007 at 2:51 pmEverytime you think the Reich Wingbats have reached their lowest, “Pundits” like Malkin lower the bar even lower. If this was a limbo contest, she’d break her back. This is so beyond the pale that their is no way to catagorize it.
September 20th, 2007 at 2:52 pmYeah, the best part of Michelle ran down the crack of her momma’s ass… along with the beer to drwon out the stench
September 20th, 2007 at 2:52 pmI’m a feminist. I believe and insist on equality for men and women. But, I object to the notion that women (specifically, mothers) somehow possess a monopoly on the propagation of peace. I respect Sally’s right to oppose war, but her comment was sexiest.
Comment by CaptainMantastic — September 20, 2007 @ 2:49 pm
“Sexiest” ?
BTW
How come you object to Sally Field’s 1 statement , as opposed to Michelle Mentalcase’s numerous idiotic ones ?
Because GOP backing morons like you and her are allowed to say all types of stupid shit without ever being questioned and/or criticized ?
You’re an imbecile………….
September 20th, 2007 at 2:54 pmCalpatnMantastic sez:
You posted the same dreck back in the “foxs-goddamn-hypocrisy” thread. I didn’t believe it then, and I don’t believe it now.
September 20th, 2007 at 2:54 pmAnyone else see Malkin’s first - and only appearance - on Hardball? She accused Kerry of self-inflicting his war wounds, offered no proof of it, and Chris Matthews waxed her like a sarcophagus, and she was summarily dismissed.
September 20th, 2007 at 2:54 pm“I’m a feminist.”
“…her comment was sexiest.”
“CaptainMantastic”
confusion?
September 20th, 2007 at 2:55 pmm.a.l.k.i.n.
September 20th, 2007 at 2:55 pmMacho
A$$
Licking
Klan
Insane
Nazi
21: She was an asshat then, and remains an asshat.
September 20th, 2007 at 2:58 pmCall it right wing consistency.
Self preservation and giving up everything to protect your child are two entiirely different things. Too bad the syncophants at Faux did not have th eballs to point this out to the beast.
Also when the beast tlaks about knowing those types of moms, I assume that she is referrng to right wingers because admittedly those are the only people she associates with.
September 20th, 2007 at 2:58 pmGee, Isn’t Sally doing exactly what Malkin claims Sally would not do? I see Sally voicing her concerns, making a stance and declaring that she will not be bullied. Yo Malkin, what do you see?
September 20th, 2007 at 2:58 pmMaklin, like Coulter, is the kind of vile, brutal, fascist punk who thrives by sucking off the adulation of hate-cheerleaders like Fox and Friends. It’s a self-validating circle of evil.
September 20th, 2007 at 2:58 pmwell, i can tell you this:
we have a lot of parent sponsored teen drinking parties -
still, after several have led to fatalities during or after -
and i would bet that every one of those parent enablers
are members of the republicRAT party…
and one mom, who lost her son because he was too drunk
September 20th, 2007 at 2:59 pmand passed out in the road and run over by another kid driving
home at 2am, had the audacity to write a letter demanding
that the driver, a 16yr old who thought she may have hit a dog,
be charged with murder…
not a mention of her son’s illegal, underage drinking
that put him in that situation in the first place…
not a hint about taking persosnal responsiblity…
…
malkin is the type of mom, who teaches her kids bigotry, hate and blind obedience to authority. Seig, what, Michelle?
September 20th, 2007 at 3:00 pmI respect Sally’s right to oppose war, but her comment was sexiest.
Comment by CaptainMantastic — September 20, 2007 @ 2:49 pm
Sexiest???
If you mean sexist, in your Bushism imitation, then prove it.
September 20th, 2007 at 3:00 pmMalkin ideal mom is somewhat north, south and west of Cariie’s mom.
September 20th, 2007 at 3:00 pmMalkin is a even bigger hatemonger than Coulter IMHO.
September 20th, 2007 at 3:01 pm“She’s the mom who tells her child never to point out when a teacher gets her facts wrong.”
Since when does a self-hating war monger like Michelle Malkin give a sh@t about getting the facts right? Lies and bigotry have served her so good all these years.
Michelle Malkin is the kind of mother who teaches her children how to hate the truth, spread bigotry and rumors and support the worst president this country has ever seen.
She’s also the mother who gives the pool boy a blowjob while the nanny takes her kids for a walk.
September 20th, 2007 at 3:01 pmMalkin’s, Carrie’s …what the hell is wrong with my fingers?
September 20th, 2007 at 3:01 pm#28: typical response from the tolerant left, also how do we know Michelles statement isnt true? I would rather have a parent ditribute the condoms then public schools
September 20th, 2007 at 3:02 pm- - See comment #1. I know her and her kids and they went to private school here in Los Angeles.
her comment was pretty damn sexy, capn…
September 20th, 2007 at 3:03 pmjeesh…
not sexiest?
Comment by CaptainMantastic — September 20, 2007 @ 3:00 pm
George, is that you?
( damn, I am laughing so hard at this troll. )
September 20th, 2007 at 3:03 pmCoulter IMHO.
Coulter, Intensely Manic Hate Orgier?
September 20th, 2007 at 3:03 pmRegarding someone she doesn’t even know, Michelle Malkin hallucinates a series of completely disparate images in her mind from one statement by Sally Field:
“If mothers ruled the, ruled the world, there would be no god-damned wars in the first placeâ€
Malkin is most definitely on drugs.
And I notice that Malkin did not address the question of war.
September 20th, 2007 at 3:03 pmron: Not “ditribute”, but, “distribute”: Are you a “C” student like bush? Why is the right so moronic? Are they all home schooled?
P.S. It’s “Michelle’s”, not, “Michelles”. One malkin is too many.
P.P.S. It’s “than” not “then” you illiterate troll.
September 20th, 2007 at 3:04 pmMalkin: Sally Field Is The Type Of Mom Who ‘Buys Her Teenager Beer And Condoms On Prom Night’
And she knows this how? My bet is on the fact that Sally Field is a much better mom that the hate-monger Malkin ever would be. But, then, she’s not married and doesn’t have any kids. That’s probably why she is so hateful, because no one loves her.
I think I dislike this woman even more than Mann Coulter.
September 20th, 2007 at 3:05 pmThis is how stupid Malkin is; she is accusing Sally Field of being passive on issues. Yet, the entire incident that is being debated is Sally Field standing up and being a strong and non passive person.
Most Republicans are not stupid. Most Stupid people are republican.
September 20th, 2007 at 3:05 pmmoms must be peace makers? what kind of fifties crap is that?
September 20th, 2007 at 3:06 pmShe’s also the mother who gives the pool boy a blowjob while the nanny takes her kids for a walk.
Comment by A Patriot Acting — September 20, 2007 @ 3:01 pm
woo hoo!!!
September 20th, 2007 at 3:09 pmLOL
I respect Sally’s right to oppose war, but her comment was sexiest.
Comment by CaptainMantastic
Oh really? Can you list for me all the names of mothers who have started wars on this earth? Can you count for me the number of mothers who think this so-called “war” in Iraq is a good idea as opposed to those who don’t? I don’t think that remark was sexist in any way. The fact is that many testosterone driven men seem to think that attacking and hurting other people is an acceptable way to act. That sure is a fact with our current government and the lemming Republic congress.
September 20th, 2007 at 3:09 pmlets elect hilary clinton and see if shes right….republicans seem so afraid of experimentation - not realizing thats what bush has been doing with the country
September 20th, 2007 at 3:11 pmtypical response from the tolerant left, also how do we know Michelles statement isnt true? I would rather have a parent ditribute the condoms then public schools
Comment by ron
Straw man on aisle Nine, we need a cleanup please.
September 20th, 2007 at 3:12 pmAfter reading this, I now agree with Sally. Screw the Iraqi’s. Let them face our enemies alone. We should abandom them to AQ and a life without freedom and democracy. I know on the feminist groups on the far left agree. We need to leave Iraq ASAP. We need to declare defeat and let AQ rule the middle east since they are much better for Iraq then the idea of freedom and democracy. I now fully agree with the far left. Lets leave and leave the fate of the Iraqi women to our terrorist enemies.
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=22487
September 20th, 2007 at 3:13 pmMalkin: Sally Field Is The Type Of Mom Who ‘Buys Her Teenager Beer And Condoms On Prom Night’
so?
September 20th, 2007 at 3:13 pmMichelle Malkin is the kind of mother who teaches her children how to hate the truth, spread bigotry and rumors and support the worst president this country has ever seen.
Michelle Malkin is not a mother and probably never will be a mother. Can you imagine breeding with that b1tch?
September 20th, 2007 at 3:13 pmAh Roger_Roger…..another strawman mess to clean up.
September 20th, 2007 at 3:14 pmDoes anyone find it ironic that the same corporation that censored the initial comment is now allowing a critic of that comment to use their forum to belittle the initial, censored comment?
September 20th, 2007 at 3:15 pmAfter reading this, I now agree with Sally. Screw the Iraqi’s. Let them face our enemies alone. We should abandom them to AQ and a life without freedom and democracy.
Too bad you don’t really mean that rogerx2. Why should Iraq have to face OUR enemies? They are not the enemy of Iraq, they are our enemies who we brought to Iraq (if they really and truly are there, which I tend to doubt). And how about we allow the people of Iraq to determine what measure of freedom and democracy they want. Who in the hell are we to dictate to them? The most recent poll showed that somewhere near 70% of the people in Iraq want us to get the hell out of their country. If that’s what the people of Iraq want, then who are we to stand in their way. Who are we to tell them anything other than “goodbye”?
September 20th, 2007 at 3:16 pmComment by Roger_Rhetoric — September 20, 2007 @ 3:13 pm
That’s a marvelous Straw Man, RR. Well done.
Let us know when you feel up to debating one of our actual positions, mmmkay?
September 20th, 2007 at 3:17 pmUnfortunately, bibobaggins, she is married with TWO little hate-filled ignorant children.
September 20th, 2007 at 3:17 pmIs there any evidence at all that Malkin and Fields have even met in a social setting ?
September 20th, 2007 at 3:18 pm…at least a few logic torturers still coming around post-registration requirements - thanks Rog - we all need reminders of how/where righties run afoul of regular reasoning.
false premises+false causality+false conclusions = following false prophets
September 20th, 2007 at 3:18 pmofftopic:
Gold Star Father Who Lost Son In Iraq Beaten By Members Of Pro-War Group
September 20th, 2007 at 3:19 pmRoger Roger, that was one of the more idiotic statements you have ever made.
All or nothing with you huh? We have to fully stand behind this president or we are anti everything. That’s BS.
September 20th, 2007 at 3:20 pmMethinks Roger is just feeling a bit down over that failed Republican war of choice.
September 20th, 2007 at 3:20 pmRR(x2): Is your home-schooled degree in “making nonsensical straw-man arguments”, “how to ignore history” or “making the most out of hypocrisy?”
No, don’t tell us, you’re a triple major.
September 20th, 2007 at 3:20 pmUsing polls when they contort to your side and ignoring them when they don’t.
How Rovian Capt.
September 20th, 2007 at 3:21 pmAs always, attack the messenger, not the message. It might be slightly more effective if I didn’t think she was just pulling stuff out of her ass anyway. I feel sorry for Malkin’s children.
September 20th, 2007 at 3:23 pm62: Right wing brown shirts at their best.
September 20th, 2007 at 3:23 pmMalkin is the kind of mom that names all her kids the same first name. She tells them apart by their last name.
September 20th, 2007 at 3:24 pmI’m shocked to learn she’s reproduced. Surely the end of times is nigh.
September 20th, 2007 at 3:25 pm#21 Anyone else see Malkin’s first - and only appearance - on Hardball? …
Comment by Badmoodman — September 20, 2007 @ 2:54 pm
===============
yah Matthews crucifies her, I winced despite that she deserved it. You can view the gutting at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Awynald_Yk
September 20th, 2007 at 3:25 pm68. Don’t be; she’s making gobs of money, selling her neo-nazi philosophy to her fox masters.
September 20th, 2007 at 3:26 pmMs. Malkin, you just cannot Swiftboat The Flying Nun. Nope, no way.
September 20th, 2007 at 3:26 pmWhy is this cunt on this site?
September 20th, 2007 at 3:28 pm72: malkin is one sick right wing wacko. How do you out coulter, coulter?
September 20th, 2007 at 3:30 pmExcuse me, but this is just flat-out slander, isn’t it?
Libel in print, and repeated as slander live?
Hey, Joe Klein–you going to write about this incivility?
September 20th, 2007 at 3:32 pmDavid Broder?
#13: “…[Malkin] gives women a bad name and has nothing relevant nor intelligent to contribute……….”
Don’t lay Malkin’s inanity on women. Malkin has mutated into a whole new species, and the fact that’s she procreating is scary indeed.
September 20th, 2007 at 3:32 pmLiberal=hate
Comment by yourfreedomofspeechendswheremyrightsbegin
And you call liberals hypocrites?
September 20th, 2007 at 3:32 pmYou spew nothing but hate on here. You clearly have nothing but contempt for anyone not on the right.
liberal=hate?
your words = hate
you have no room to criticise here, friend.
captainlittlemanhood: The amendment does not mention MoveOn.org.
September 20th, 2007 at 3:32 pmSo, now what are you bored grand old perverts going to do?
#51 R2
Screw the Iraqi’s.
Been doing that since 03/2003
Let them face our enemies alone.
We have met the enemy, and it’s US
We should abandom them to AQ and a life without freedom and democracy
The Iraqis will deal with AQI as soon as they’re finished dealing with US
We need to declare defeat and let AQ rule the middle east
Assumption that AQI is capable of taking over something other than a cave or two on the Pakistani border
since they are much better for Iraq then the idea of freedom and democracy.
September 20th, 2007 at 3:33 pmI wonder how much more freedom and democracy the Iraqis can stand from us.
Attacking Sally Fields is like attacking the Energizer Bunny. Malkin must be really desperate. Who watches the Emmy’s anyway? Judging by the ratings this year, fewer and fewer people. And those lonely few who did didn’t get to hear what Fields said, anyway, so really, what’s the point?
Poor Michelle. Scraping the barrel for anything to say that will attract attention.
September 20th, 2007 at 3:33 pmWow. Michelle Malkin claims to know a great deal about how Sally Field has raised her children. Has she witnessed Sally’s parenting first-hand? Or is she just creating a straw man (straw mom?) to rail against?
I was raised by a mother who was politically liberal — someone who Michelle would consider a “Sally Field type” mother. I can assure you she never handed me beer or condoms, but she did teach me that doing stupid things carry certain consequences. She didn’t stop me from from challenging authority figures who had their facts wrong, but she did teach me politeness and manners — to be used when I did so. She didn’t beat up people who exhibited vulgar behavior in front of me, but she taught me tolerance instead of bigotry. And like Sally Field’s child, I signed up for the military after high school.
Michelle seems to have written this hate column entirely as a reaction to Sally saying something about mothers being less likely to start wars. Does Michelle want to go out and start a war or something?
September 20th, 2007 at 3:33 pmMalkin is an utter waste of space. I wonder what fills the whole where her soul should be.?
September 20th, 2007 at 3:34 pmtypical response from the tolerant left, also how do we know Michelles statement isnt true? I would rather have a parent ditribute the condoms then public schools
Recommend | Report Abuse
Comment by ron — September 20, 2007 @ 2:59 pm
You should try going to public school. You clearly have no education.
September 20th, 2007 at 3:34 pmDammit!
yourfreedomofspeechendswheremyrightsbegin got booted before I had a chance to respond
September 20th, 2007 at 3:34 pm#85 GollyMissMolly
September 20th, 2007 at 3:35 pmstraw mom? ROFLMAO!!!!
bilbobaggins
I can think of numerous mothers/females who have started wars. Queen Elizabeth, Queen Mary, Joan of Arc, etc. Men don’t have a monopoly on aggression.
September 20th, 2007 at 3:36 pmMichelle Malkin is the type of Mom who would burn down the house of a neighbor because they were the same race as the person who threw sand in her child’s face on the playground. Then she’d publicly call for anyone else from that race be sent to concentration camps. Then she’d write books about it for personal profit.
September 20th, 2007 at 3:37 pmTP: Please change the topic. I think we’re a little tired of beating that dead horse, malkin.
September 20th, 2007 at 3:37 pmShe’s a small piece of sh@t, stuck to the toilet paper on America’s shoe.
#56 Are you really that naive to think AQ isn’t in Iraq? The August report showed they were responsible for over 35% of all civilian deaths in Iraq in August of this year. They aren’t just in Iraq, they are in Iraq raping women, killing civilians, and murdering Americans. Please explain how abandoning the Iraqi’s and declaring defeat against AQ somehow furthers my security.
September 20th, 2007 at 3:39 pmPsycho President - wow, I am starting to login just to read your skits. Nice satire for sure…very funny.
Malkin is a repukian tool, and I hope Sally Fields sues the crap out of her for these slanderous lies.
Buck Fush
September 20th, 2007 at 3:41 pmrr(x2): AQ is 2 - 5 per cent of the insurgency. How’s that home-schooling going?
September 20th, 2007 at 3:42 pmoff topic: This new PassWord system sucks.
September 20th, 2007 at 3:47 pm#62 That is both sad and disgusting. following the links to the eagles website and comments is quite illuminating. First they claim to not have anything to do with what went on, then they claim to be liberating the picture of a hero from the #^*$^$*&*$%# left. They also claim that they are a bipartisan organization, while their site spews forth rightwing talking points and is rife with inaccuracies aimed at the left, including but not limited to pinning Fred Phelps and the Westboro Baptist church on the left. Of course any dissenting opinions get scrubbed from the site very quickly and get slammed from a right only perspective. I guess when they say they are bi-partisan they mean war supporters and pro-war supporters or republicans and conservatives because it ibis painfully obvious that they have no interest in debate or even in hearing what anyone with opinions other than those that match their own.
I don’t think it is off topic at all, afterall these are Malkins readers, these are Bush’s supporters, these are the base.
September 20th, 2007 at 3:48 pmThe deaths in Iraq from “Al Qaeda in Iraq” (which is separate from the international Al Qaeda organization) by our government are HIGHLY exaggerated.
http://www.iht.com/ articles/ ap/ 2007/ 06/ 09/ africa/ ME-GEN-Iraq-Enemy-No.-1.php
The Bush admin wants to PRETEND we’re in Iraq because of Al Qaeda attacking us on 9/11, but like most things they claim, it is BS.
September 20th, 2007 at 3:49 pmThere are Salafi extremists who have branded themselves al Qaeda in Iraq, but they are not the same group that was in Afghanistan and planned the 9/11 attack. BTW, this Salafi extremists were not functioning in Iraq until we toppled the Ba’athist regime.
No it didn’t. The DoD (and compliant media) have taken up the fraudulent practice since last summer of claiming all vehicular bombings are the work of “al Qaeda”, which is wholly unsupported by any facts.
Simple, the Sunni insurgents and the Shite majority are enemies of al Qaeda and will dispose of al Qaeda in Iraq because it is in their own interest to do so. What you and every pro-war moron can’t seem to grasp is, that the Sunni/tribal run secular Ba’athist regime were ENEMIES of political islam and particularly of extremists like al Qaeda. Furthermore, Iran and the Shites are also enemies of the sunni extremist Salafi jihadists like al Qaeda.
I would point out however, that our invasion and ocntinued occupation of Iraq is putting your security MORE at risk becaus eof the long-term hatred it is isntilling in the non-extrmeist muslim world and througout the region.
Simply put, you don’t know jack-shit about what you are talking about while you stand there in your puddle of pee you made from the moment the planes hit on 9/11. Typical ignorant warmongering Fright-winger and neocon enabler. Quell surprise.
September 20th, 2007 at 3:52 pmAnd like Sally Field’s child, I signed up for the military after high school.
Michelle seems to have written this hate column entirely as a reaction to Sally saying something about mothers being less likely to start wars. Does Michelle want to go out and start a war or something?
Comment by missmolly — September 20, 2007 @ 3:33 pm
i’d forgotten about that - is malkin aware that sally field’s son is in the military… something to hit her back with, for sure…
good comment all ’round…
September 20th, 2007 at 3:55 pm…
Unfortunately, bibobaggins, she is married with TWO little hate-filled ignorant children
Comment by A Patriot Acting
You’re kidding me. Someone actually chose to breed with her. YUCK!
September 20th, 2007 at 3:56 pm#95 While the figures show AQ is only 5%-10% of the insurgency, they do in fact account for over 35% of all civilian deaths in Iraq. 35% IS ALOT in my world. They are in Iraq. The are raping women, and murdering thousands. Why again do you want to walk away from AQ?
While I fully agree that invading Iraq was a serious mistake, never the less we did it. We made a mess and AQ came after us and the Iraqi’s. Do you think it is honestly fair to the Iraqi’s if we leave now? We made the mess. Shouldn’t we clean it up? AQ is killing Iraqi’s (35% of all deaths are credited to them in August). Personally, I feel that we owe the Iraqi’s a chance at freedom and democracy. We need to rebuild that country since we wrecked it. We need to rid them of extremist like AQ. Isn’t that fair?
September 20th, 2007 at 3:58 pmComment by missmolly — September 20, 2007 @ 3:33 pm
Malkin, your crow is served.
September 20th, 2007 at 4:01 pm#90…I don’t think any of the women you list were mothers
September 20th, 2007 at 4:02 pmNo offense to the malkin lovers here, but michelle is just a product of our time.
September 20th, 2007 at 4:03 pmShe probably believes about as much of what she says as Limbaugh, which is usually less than half.
It’s about shock, and ratings.
Clearly, as with Rush, she would never have the cajones to actually confront her opponent and utter these remarks.
rogerx2 how can you use any stats when they are skewed from the begining? Car bombs don’t count as deaths but are they counted as AQI deaths? Does the AQI shoot in the front of the head or back? Just where do you get these numbers?
September 20th, 2007 at 4:03 pmCan we start calling Malkin and her ilk what they are now? Nazis. Plain and simple.
September 20th, 2007 at 4:05 pmofftopic:
Gold Star Father Who Lost Son In Iraq Beaten By Members Of Pro-War Group
Comment by Wayne
That is disgusting beyond words. And, one has to ask, why weren’t the men arrested and charged with assault. It sounds like this assault was similar to the Jena assaults referenced on this blog and those young men were all arrested and charged with assault.
Could it be because they were “pro-war” protesters that they were not arrested for assault?
September 20th, 2007 at 4:06 pm#107 Please answer my second paragragh.
September 20th, 2007 at 4:06 pmThis post is seriously disturbing. I haven’t paid too much attention to the wingnuts lately; I forgot about Malkin. That, or I hoped that maybe she would have grown up by now. Oh well. Give ‘m hell Sally; it’s a shame that these days, the only time we get to hear any real truths on the tube; their spoken on awards shows (remember Kanye after Katrina?).
September 20th, 2007 at 4:10 pmRedbeard72
Malkin would never meet with or challenge Field to a debate on a discussion of their differences regarding war. That’s too grown-up, too adult for her to manage. Instead she chooses to attack Field’s motherhood, and by inference, her children and who they are as human beings.
She really has now earned herself Worst Person in the World, lifetime membership.
September 20th, 2007 at 4:13 pm#56 Are you really that naive to think AQ isn’t in Iraq? The August report showed they were responsible for over 35% of all civilian deaths in Iraq in August of this year.
Roger roger, you are taking the word of our government as gospel. Well, I feel sorry for you. You’ve been lied to, what 100 times, and yet you still drink the kool-aid. What our government has done is to call insurgents “al queda in Mesopotamia” to create a new boogy man. While our military estimates that these so-called “al Queda” types are less than 5% of the people fighting in Iraq, they credit them with 35% of civilian deaths. That’s quite an accomplishment, don’t you think.
No, I am not naive, you are. You buy anything the lying sack of shit Bush tells you without any critical thought at all. I feel very sorry for you but I feel more sorry for the people who live around you.
September 20th, 2007 at 4:13 pmThis hatefest by Malkin, National Review, and Fox illustrates well the meltdown being experienced by the neo-Nazi right in this country. Deadenders all, in their last throes.
September 20th, 2007 at 4:17 pmWhile our military estimates that these so-called “al Queda†types are less than 5% of the people fighting in Iraq, they credit them with 35% of civilian deaths. That’s quite an accomplishment, don’t you think.
Comment by bilbobaggins — September 20, 2007 @ 4:13 pm
I think the official estimate is 2%.
R2 doesn’t calibrate against reality. Ever.
September 20th, 2007 at 4:18 pmWayne, that story is not off topic at all. Malkin touted the Gathering of Eagles march for weeks on her website, she was a sponsor of their march. And she has posted nothing about this horrible beating of a father who lost his child.
Her rhetoric ala Field and anyone who dares to speak out - including parents of fallen troops - feeds this kind of thing. She gives people who hate Muslims, hate Mexicans and even hate grieving families permission to act out that hate with these kinds of acts.
How brave. Beating up a man who has lost a son and has decided it was wrong. I think of Carlos pulling his memorial to his son around from state to state and my heart hurts.
September 20th, 2007 at 4:23 pmSo she is a irresponsible parent because she doesn’t believe in war. She didn’t in fact single out Iraq. She was talking about war in general. It’s unimaginable the lengths these cowards who won’t fight themselves go to promote war. These self-proclaimed followers of Jesus. Who is referred to in the Bible as The Prince of Peace.
September 20th, 2007 at 4:23 pmI have to say I’m totally shocked that Michelle Malkin is behaving like a right wing goon, focusing a personal attack of the most vicious kind against someone she somehow disagrees with. I mean, it’s not like Malkin does this every single day of her life, or that she’s made a career out of it.
September 20th, 2007 at 4:29 pmJust where do you get these numbers?
Comment by hellinabucket — September 20, 2007 @ 4:03 pm
From the B.R.R.B., hellinabucket…
The prestigious “Bureau of Roger_Roger’s Butt”.
September 20th, 2007 at 4:37 pm#115 Do you have any proof to say our elected officails are incorrect? I am looking for hard evidence, not just some theory your hoping is true to further your agenda. Call me what you want, but I back our troops and when our generals provide stats, I trust them. Why is it so hard for you to trust the troops fighting for your freedom (and Iraqi freedom)?
September 20th, 2007 at 4:38 pmOkay, you’re a fu*king idiot. General Petraeus. You know, the guy you support said that it wasn’t his report and that it was the White Houses report, because that is what is required by Congress.
Get your facts straight you fu*king idiot.
September 20th, 2007 at 4:44 pmI’m a feminist.
If your a feminist why would you say this:
Although, Sally is sexy.
Ah I know, it’s the hypocrite in you coming out for all to see.
September 20th, 2007 at 4:46 pmCaptainMantastic,
Why don’t you try reading your own link about Bush’s comments before invading Iraq. Try searching for the words “Al Qaeda” in that whitehouse.gov link you posted, and you’ll find that Bush very clearly tried to use Saddam’s connection to Al Qaeda as a reason for our invasion of Iraq.
Since that speech, they have continued to use Al Qaeda as the reason for staying in Iraq. To say otherwise is a flat out lie.
September 20th, 2007 at 4:58 pmI notice RogerDodger refuses to address my refutation of his nonsense.
Typical.
September 20th, 2007 at 5:04 pmThis Michelle Malkin character, Where did she come from? Or more pointedly, what Z rated fluff palace in Olangapo PI (bestride the mighty river shit), did that skank crawl out of? Formerly drunken, carousing, nightmare besieged, expeditionary Jarheads wish to know? Shheeeesh, if we had passed like ships in the night, lo so many years ago, her re-visitations to your humble, though somnambulist narrator would have caused nightmares of Timothy Learyesque proportions. Not saying I don’t deserve them, but is nothing sacred? That is one Scary looking Femme!
September 20th, 2007 at 5:06 pm#124 Someone can be a feminist and find someone sexy. Feminist doesn’t equal asexual.
September 20th, 2007 at 5:07 pmWhile I continue to agree we should not have invaded Iraq, I fail to understand why we should leave now. We destroyed Iraq. Isn’t it our responsibility to restore it? Isn’t it fair that we provide security for the folks of Iraq and help them rebuild? Isn’t it our duty to rid the country of extremism, AQ, and other terrorist organizations? How can we possibliy abandom the Iraqi people right now?
September 20th, 2007 at 5:07 pmAs opposed to Malkin’s parents who apparently taught her early that the “oldest profession” would come quite easily to her.
September 20th, 2007 at 5:08 pmWhy is it so hard for you to trust the troops fighting for your freedom (and Iraqi freedom)?
I trust what the troops say, such as what 7 members of the 82nd (my old division ) wrote, what my son who is in Iraq tells me, what my bro-in law who is in Iraq tell me. Also what my sister, who was wounded in Iraq tells me ( especially about how the wounded have been treated ). I also trust my own experiences with what the VA has become under Bushco
You are nothing but a Bush bootlicker who does not really even give a damn about the troops. “Support the Troops” is just an empty slogan coming from you neocon bootlickers.
You are full of it, Roger(x2)
September 20th, 2007 at 5:09 pmRoger Roger, Wayne brings some very strong convictions with his statement. He appears to speak with more than just a knee jerk reaction to Bush.
Your argument bounces from fighting for our freedom in Iraq (which I have never been convinced of) and staying in Iraq to fix what we broke. Why is it that we have to “fix” it with our military? Why not an increase in economic aid?
I don’t trust the same administration that broke it to fix it and I certainly can’t justify the death of one more soldier or marine in the false name of keeping us free or providing them security.
September 20th, 2007 at 5:14 pm#132 I fought in Desert Storm. Does my conviction mean anything?
September 20th, 2007 at 5:17 pmGawd. That hateful beeyatch ought to just drop dead.
September 20th, 2007 at 6:00 pmI don’t see how Malkin can judge Sally Field to be a mother who would buy her kids beer and condoms just from an anti-war statement. But based on Malkin’s tendency to make judgments about people based on no facts or reason at all, I can judge her to be of reprehensible character.
After all, this is the woman after all who
September 20th, 2007 at 6:02 pm1) claimed that an Iraqi captain “Jamil Hussein”, who reported on 6 Sunnis being set on fire, did not exist, only to be embarrassingly proven wrong when Iraq Ministry of the Interior confirmed that Jamil Hussein did in fact exist,
2) claimed, despite having no evidence, that John Kerry shot himself in Vietnam in order to get a Purple Heart despite, you know, what the guys who were with him in Vietnam said,
3) thinks Joseph McCarthy was right and a great man despite what practically all historians think, and
4) believes that we were right to put Japanese in concentration camps and confiscate all their property during World War II.
If we were winning we’d have won.
Our army is hideously overstretched, we are hunkered down in the green zone, and we don’t even control the road to the airport.
If we were acting as a damper on violence, can anybody cite one single instance where we intervened in a firefight and stopped it?
No, we just send out patrols to get shot at, kill a bunch of people that could be Al Qaeda or Shiites or hapless civilians–and then go back and crunch numbers so that it shows we’re winning.
This isn’t even Vietnam, where they fed us spurious numbers of people we killed to assure us we were winning.
No, they’re feeding us crime statistics–details of what these guys are doing to those guys, which proves we’re winning!. Not sorties flown, not territory gained–crime statistics.
It’s like the Crips and the Bloods shooting it out, and when there’s a lull in the fighting, the LAPD shouts “Success!”
Does Petraeus speak Arabic? No? Then how does he know AT ALL what’s happening in Iraq? Why. of vourse he can trust his Iraqi interpreters!
With millions of internal refugees, and millions fleeing the country, what is thte US doing about it? Doesn’t that come under the Pottery Barn theory?
We aren’t trying to secure the borders,m we aren’t trying to secure the oil pipelines, we aren’t trying to bring aid to the refugees. Just hunkered down.
It really doesn’t matter if the wingnuts don’t believe we’ve lost. Osama Bin Laden knows we’ve lost. Vladimir Putin knows we’ve lost. The rest of the world knows we’ve lost. And we’ve lost in a war we chose, at the time we chose, amd using white phosphorous on people and torturing them in our fortress of evil. We brought in mercenaries–and if you think because it’s called Blackwater that they’re Americanns, think again. Russian Spetsnaz, Ex central American Death Squad members, Stasi, South Africann ex-polce,you nsme it. Many of those would never get into this country with their records.And free of thte UCMJ, or any rules for that matter. And we’re still losing.
George Bush has had four years to win his war, with the largest and most technologically advanced army the world has ever seen. He was give an as much money as he asked for, with absolutely no strings attached. If he had asked for a draft he’d have gotten one.
And he’s got us hunkered down in the Green Zone, while Iraqi kills Iraqi and we follow it like it’s fantasy baseball.
Even if we throw the bums out, bring the troops home, we will never lead the world again. Europe watches our sinking currency, our horrifying medical system, our news media and they shake their heads. They look at Michael Savage and Michelle Malkin–and they will not see the America of Eisennhowet, Kennnedy, Bill Clinton, or even George Herbet Walker Bush.
they see a ruin.
September 20th, 2007 at 6:17 pmI fought in Desert Storm. Does my conviction mean anything?
Comment by Roger_Roger — September 20, 2007 @ 5:17 pm
82nd Airborne, 2nd Brigade, MOS 18B - Special Weapons Sergeant 1982-1991
I fought in Desert Storm and was wounded ( ending my military carear after 9 years, I was wounded 2 times previously ), My sister was wounded in Iraq, I have family currently there.
You want to claim my conviction does not mean anything?
which division and brigade did you serve in and your mos?
September 20th, 2007 at 6:19 pmIt’s all about equality and respect. Just ask my wife, EmpressChicktabulous.
Comment by CaptainMantastic — September 20, 2007 @ 5:49 pm
Sounds better then LadyIntercontinentaButtocks
/snark
September 20th, 2007 at 6:28 pmOh my goodness, no wonder your(sic) are lefty!
List all the mothers who have started wars? holy smokes, holy cow!!!!
Open up a history book!!!! get an education, go to elementry(SIC) school, then to high school and finally go to college!!!!
How can any educated person ask such a question?!
geez!!! I am embarrassed for you!
Are you kidding me? child, uneducated person,
such great lack of education.
Comment by yourfreedomofspeechendswheremyrightsbegin — September 20, 2007 @ 3:17 pm
I love how you always call others uneducated here, yourfreedomofspeechendswheremyrightsbegin/howsad/and at least a half a dozen other monikers.
September 20th, 2007 at 7:10 pmYou should be embarrassed for yourself first: unable to spell, punctuate and use capital letters to start a sentence–something I learned in elementary school. Oh, that’s right; you only went to “elementry” school.
Moreover, you are the biggest and most pathetic hypocrite of all: always posting bile and hatred here, while accusing those to the left of you of being full of hatred. Typical Rovian tactic of accusing your ideological opponent of what you are guilty of. Sorry, sosad, that doesn’t work on me.
Michelle is only trying to get a job and say anything that makes news even lies. Now Michelle better hope the GOP gets kicked out because her children might be forced in the military to invade other countries. Yes Sally’s children are grown with kids of their own. When the Republican party says woman should stay at home and raise their kids Michelle will be out of a job. Sucking up to the GOP is what alot of people are doing these days. Michelle should try interviewing Nelson Mandela as her leader idiot Bush said Saddam killed Nelson Mandela.
September 20th, 2007 at 7:43 pmMalkin is such a slime ball. Maybe she should be renditioned to the Mariana islands to work in a sweat shop?
September 20th, 2007 at 7:44 pmMan, I’ve seen people sued for a lot less than this. Fields should sue Michelle Malkin for millions. Fields has a son in the military. Is there any jury in the country that wouldn’t rule in Sally Fields’ favor against a horrible harpie like Malkin?
And, Mantastic, it’s hard to believe you linked to Bush’s original message on Iraq as a means of supporting him. The thing’s a cavalcade of balls-out lies. Iraq has ballistic missles capable of killing up to 135,000 Americans???!!!! Stockpiles of chemical weapons???!!!!! That message simply reminds us of how Bush lied us into a horrible war.
September 20th, 2007 at 8:09 pmSomebody throw Malkin a fart. She is irrelevant.
September 20th, 2007 at 8:15 pmAnd, Mantastic, it’s hard to believe you linked to Bush’s original message on Iraq as a means of supporting him. The thing’s a cavalcade of balls-out lies. Iraq has ballistic missles capable of killing up to 135,000 Americans???!!!! Stockpiles of chemical weapons???!!!!! That message simply reminds us of how Bush lied us into a horrible war.
Comment by Ret. Col. Jack Ripper — September 20, 2007 @ 8:09 pm
Yeah, I was wondering why he would remind us of those lies too.
Also curious why when I confront roger(x2) he always disappears…..
September 20th, 2007 at 8:18 pmThat is curious too.
My sense (it might be wrong, of course) is that Sally is more strict (in the right way) with her children than Michelle would ever be. So, why is she (Michelle) saying this? Because she’s playing for the anti-liberal base. She will lose the argument and I, as a father of three children know she’s a loser!
September 20th, 2007 at 8:41 pmMale..kin has a kid. Could it be Coulter’s? They look like they could have 1 together. Don’tcha just feel sorry for the kid and their parents.
September 20th, 2007 at 9:27 pmThere are some abortions that should have happened and then sterilization. In my life I never would believe I would say that.
too bad she’s not as smart as liberals are:
http://www.alternet.org/story/62436
that is correct, righties - you’re less intelligent, and we can prove it.
September 20th, 2007 at 9:30 pmWhere did Michelle get HER beer and condoms on prom night? Sounds like a pretty cool mom to me. Michelle on prom night: like throwing a hot dog down a hallway, and now she’s all “uptight” about it.
September 20th, 2007 at 9:37 pmSally Field Is The Type Of Mom Who ‘Buys Her Teenager Beer And Condoms On Prom Night’
Hell, I’d buy my son condoms on prom night. He can get his own beer.
Heh.
September 20th, 2007 at 9:49 pmSorry Michelle, but your teeth are so white they look like dentures. Scale it back a bit, hun.
September 20th, 2007 at 9:50 pmdangerous and offensive doesn’t even begin to cover it. Perverse, deceitful, self agrandizing, venal, giddy in a helter skelter way, and just plain dumb offers a bit better insight.
September 20th, 2007 at 10:03 pmAnd let us praise merciful God that Michelle’s not a mom.
September 20th, 2007 at 10:05 pmWhile reading this post, I kept thinking back to the Max Blumenthal video of Michele Malkin at CPAC earlier this year. I remembered that Malklin was the one guilty of “spewing profanities” after she was filmed by Blumentahl. Check out this audio, which was taped after the Blumenthal video was made:
http://sadlyno.com/archives/5247.html
Also, there is a link to the actual Blumenthal video of Malkin at the bottom of the sadlyno.com post.
September 20th, 2007 at 10:52 pmEw. I looked it up. Malkin IS a mother.
Blech…
September 20th, 2007 at 11:46 pmMalkin: Sally Field Is The Type Of Mom Who ‘Buys Her Teenager Beer And Condoms On Prom Night’
September 21st, 2007 at 12:48 amIt just goes to show what a one track mind these Gross Odd Perverts have… must be a genetic defect of some sort.
“…motherhood should bring a ferocity, and dare I say, make us more violent.” …saith Momma Malkin
Well, Malkin certainly qualifies for motherhood, because she is one VIOLENT MUTHA!
September 21st, 2007 at 1:07 am>Isn’t it our duty to rid the country of extremism,
And we’re going to do this by military force? How well did that work for Israel in Palestine? Do you approve of the democratically elected goverment of palestine?
Do you support Iraqis having the freedom to become and ally of Iran who supports everything Iran supports?
You spout your “I agree we shouldnt have invaded Iraq” garbage, but I say its lies….anyone who still cant figure out that bush lied isnt going to disagree with his decision to invade…”we know where the weapons are”..”we know without a doubt that saddam has wmd”…”i will fire anyone involved in the leak”…..”saddam tried to buy uranium”,.. blah blah on and on..and you cant find one untruth in all this?
Stop trying to claim your anything but a goose-stepping bootlicker for Duh Fuhrer Rodger…
September 21st, 2007 at 4:25 amWow Wayne,
September 21st, 2007 at 6:04 amRoger x2 is busy reading his daddy’s Time-Life WWII books trying to find something that sounds real to hit you back with.
Good job I say!
Malkin is a ######## (rhymes with “female dog and useless vagina”). What a truly nasty piece of work….
Cheers,
September 21st, 2007 at 7:03 amMichelle Malkin is the kind of mother to raise a Pol Pot and be proud of it.
Poor Ms. Malkin, it is really hard to watch a person who attacks others to disguise her self-hatred. The poor girl wishes beyond measure that she were a blue-eyed, blond, white woman, and no matter how much money she gets and how great her fulminations it won’t be enough to make her white.
Michael Jackson sliced off his face in the same quest that Ms. Malkin slices off her decency, only Jackson was an artist and Malkin is a hack.
September 21st, 2007 at 3:48 pmI feel sorry for Malkin. The flying nun is a paradigm of intellectual honesty and moral fortitude. Malkin had better watch who she picks a fight with, Sally still believes everyone really, really likes her. I know I still do.
September 26th, 2007 at 12:09 pm