So you are still holding to “Jesus is a socialist” even though you admitted you have no evidence of that. Not exactly sound theology or logic, but if it works for ya, fine.

I make a point of knowing as little as possible about gay sex, but I assume it’s generally peaceful. It’s still immoral. That pesky immorality again. ;)

“larry craig doesn’t look to be too ashamed, strutting his creepy old junk around D.C. like he’d just gotten a speeding ticket.”

Obviously he had sense enough to be ashamed of it, so he hid it. Unfortunately, he gave in to it. He’s slimey because of his behavior, not his politics.

“you’re edging over towards hysterical now – accusing me of some unknown immorality leadership thing or something, so i’m going to leave you alone to your apocaplypse forecasting.”
Comment by tombaker — September 25, 2007 @ 6:36 pm

Not hysterical in the least, bud. I’m quite content with the whole situation because I know how it’ll end and that I’ll be fine. You might have noticed that I said folks like you, not you personally, will lead the way to decline. Don’t worry, you won’t take all the responsibility. ;)

larry craig doesn’t look to be too ashamed, strutting his creepy old junk around D.C. like he’d just gotten a speeding ticket.

you’re edging over towards hysterical now – accusing me of some unknown immorality leadership thing or something, so i’m going to leave you alone to your apocaplypse forecasting.

the only “moral decline” I see much about is that of righties, who keep getting caught doing the sickest things.

is your defense that married lesbians MADE them do it??

Comment by tombaker — September 25, 2007 @ 6:00 pm

Peace doesn’t equate with morality, tommie boy. Sick behavior is the result of people giving in to deviant desires. Deviance is present in all groups. Most righties at least have sense enough to be ashamed of their deviant urges. That doesn’t mean they never give in to it. Immorality is rampant in our society and it will only get worse. And folks like you will be in the lead. ;)

the only “moral decline” I see much about is that of righties, who keep getting caught doing the sickest things.

is your defense that married lesbians MADE them do it??

Of course there has.

“But there will be, in time.”
Comment by tombaker — September 25, 2007 @ 1:14 pm

Yes, there will be more, since we already know the moral decline in the U.S. and the world will continue. ;)

Not that it’s any of your business, but it was John Sharp.

“Oh, and by the way, calling someone redneck (aka klanlovin, ignorant bigot) trailer trash isnt an attack on all people who are poor, or even all people who live in trailers. Is calling a guy who bombs abortion clinics a “relgious wacko” an attack on all religious people?”

Trailer trash is a reference to a group of people as is redneck. An abortion clinic bomber is an individual. The two don’t compare. If you use the term trailer trash, don’t claim to care about the poor or you are a hypocrite, bud.

“Allegations of hipocracy, from someone who voted for a guy who starts wars based on lies but refuses allow tax dollars to be used to experiment on single celled entities destined for the garbage because “he wont allow taxpayer money to be used for the taking of innocent life”.. hahahahahah.”

I see. As long as you get to decide who is eligible for killing, everything is ok. Got it! ;)

“If the democratic party was “ultra-liberal” this war would already have been defunded, because one thing a majority CAN do in congress is not do anything. Stop pretending your anything but a dyed in the wool flaghumping republican.”
Comment by Chocolate Jesus — September 25, 2007 @ 6:35 am

Where did I say that a majority of the Democrat party is currently ultra liberal? Ultra libs were taking control back in the 70’s. That’s why Reagan was elected in the 80’s and many conservative dems became Republicans. Dems swung back nearer to the middle in most of America. Obvious bastions of lib lunacy excepted. Now the hard left is rearing it’s ugly head again with the issue of the war driving normal people back to the dems. ;)

I call B.S.

The last Democrat deserving of your vote was?

Oh, and by the way, calling someone redneck (aka klanlovin, ignorant bigot) trailer trash isnt an attack on all people who are poor, or even all people who live in trailers. Is calling a guy who bombs abortion clinics a “relgious wacko” an attack on all religious people?

Allegations of hipocracy, from someone who voted for a guy who starts wars based on lies but refuses allow tax dollars to be used to experiment on single celled entities destined for the garbage because “he wont allow taxpayer money to be used for the taking of innocent life”.. hahahahahah.

If the democratic party was “ultra-liberal” this war would already have been defunded, because one thing a majority CAN do in congress is not do anything. Stop pretending your anything but a dyed in the wool flaghumping republican.

Comment by Ret. Col. Jack Ripper — September 24, 2007 @ 6:49 pm

I don’t support a lot of what Bush has done. I voted for him because he claimed he would support conservative ideals. He hasn’t done that. I also voted for him because of the candidates chosen by Dems. I’d happily vote for a conservative Democrat. I would never have voted for a Republican if the Dem party hadn’t been hijacked by ultra liberals. ;)

No one is obliged, by virtue of political stripe, to tolerate bullsh*t.

Go feign shock and indignation elsewhere. No one here buys the act.

Comment by tombaker — September 24, 2007 @ 3:31 pm

I’d probably be a little angry if the intended insult applied to me, tommie boy. Since it doesn’t, I’m neither hurt nor angry. I am, however, amused at your loonie response. According to views on this site, anytime a lib is called on their hypocrisy, it’s actually someone else feigning shock and indignation. Or it’s someone else using a strawman. Or it’s someone else…….whatever. Always someone else’s fault or someone else’s responsibility, eh bud? ;)

I didn’t say it was ok. I don’t make “trailer park” jokes myself because I think they are elitist. I’m just saying is that it’s ironic that someone who supports a president and party which has made life much tougher on the working classes would sit there and pretend to care about trailer park residents. You can’t really care about working class people if you support Bush and if you think you do, you’re just fooling yourself.

*eyeroll*

VIDEOS

Alan Greenspan: The Iraq War is Largely About Oil
http://beta.redlasso.com/Community/ClipPlayer.aspx?i=7c626177-7df1-4aab-820d-30147db847b3

Alan Greenspan Criticizes Bush/GOP Spending
http://beta.redlasso.com/Community/ClipPlayer.aspx?i=364a5dec-8930-4e23-8ae4-f35109f31ee1

was this not true for the APOLLO PROJECT?

do you not understand why it’s important to label ANY project of this kind as something POSITIVE and not negative, such as nuclear war?
…

I don’t decide anything that has to do with you. I just calls ‘em like everybody sees ‘em.
Comment by Spudge Boy — September 24, 2007 @ 2:34 pm

I agree. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck…

No one is obliged, by virtue of political stripe, to tolerate bullsh*t.

Our liberal Founders didn’t tolerate King James, Redcoats, or Tories, and we don’t tolerate righty propagandists and their taskmasters.

Go feign shock and indignation elsewhere. No one here buys the act.

Comment by criticalthinker — September 24, 2007 @ 2:28 pm

You could admit that I am partially right. I do at least know how electricity is generated. I understand you point however. I think as we produce the keys to solar power, and other non-polluting sources, the cost will go down. Their is also the start-up investment, that would well be worth not using fossil fews in say 20-30 years. Or whenever the oil supply runs out.