like those specific numbers for the specific amounts Abrahmhoff contributed to democrats? still waiting for those…. maybe micheal can help you, he’s so fact obsessed in sure he has them.

> Am I arrogant in my knowledge?
>Certainly. I have no problem with that.

Right.. your too stupid to realise that someone who doesnt understand the difference between “accoutant” and “accountability” doesnt deserve to be arrogant about his vocabularly, let alone his worldly knowledge in general.

Figures though, that someone who beleives Bush is a good president has NO idea what the word “accoutability” means, or what an accountant does (balance the books, something bush is incapeable of).

But then again, you’re supporting a party whose current 2008 frontrunner insists we can pay for one tax cut by making a second one…

You’re white trash, redneck scum. Period. Your wife is obviously an even worse judge of character than you, or she’d still be with the father of her children instead of making what could only be considered a fall down the evolutionary ladder by marrying you.

Please explain your intellectual or educational background that makes you deludedly beleive your better than any of us?

>you spout your George Soros talking points.

right, its just you poor common folk against us champagne sipped burgoies fruitcakes, such a shame you have no ridiculously rich right wing people to help you out in your crusade to manipulate popular opinion..

Coming from a WMD bedwetter, I can’t decide if this is truly hilarious, or just sadly pathetic.

You have provided ZERO facts. You consider a fact to be anything that you say or anything that you cite from your Right Wing Loon websites.

Here are some facts for you, read them and weep:

http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=312

cultist.

I think we should ask him these questions wherever he raises his scaly head.

Comment by gummitch — September 29, 2007 @ 9:18 pm

If Li’l Footie has a nasty taste in his mouf, I assures ya, it ain’t jes’ from hypocrisy!

Comment by The Republic of Stupidity — September 29, 2007 @ 9:06 pm

Not to mention, he has yet to respond to the thread: a retired colonel, a regular contributor to FoxNews, has maligned acting general staff. Where is the outrage from the “conservatives”? Where is the outrage from O. Bigfoot? Doesn’t hypocrisy leave a nasty taste in the mouth?

I think we should ask him these questions wherever he raises his scaly head.

I just heard Sam Seder on the Ring of Fire podcast from last week. Sam was talking about Larry Craig and the Republican politicians and I think he was right on.

Sam said that the gay Republican politicians are in the closet and repressed. This explains their bizarre illegal behavior like Craig admittedly soliciting gay sex in an airport bathroom stall. It explains that Republican official in Florida recently caught trying to explain his buying a blowjob from an undercover police officer in a bathroom stall by saying he was afraid of black people. It explains Haggerty and his drug addiction and gay affair.

Sam said he personally knows of at least two other Republican Senators he thinks are gay. I’m guessing Lindsay Graham, a former JAG officer no less (a double whammy with the Republican we don’t want gays in the military policy).

Sam recounted how he walked the floor of the Republican convention trying to find a single person who would admit they were gay. He said he walked and walked. Finally someone took him aside and pointed him to an admittedly gay Republican delegate from Florida. Sam said the man was about 64 years old and had undergone a life changing self-realization. Sam said the man was almost crying as he told Sam, if I don’t stay here who will voice the opinion of gay people? That is the only gay person Sam could find. Right.

So all this brings me to, who else, the evil object of Republicans’ obsessions – Ahmadinejad. When asked about gay people at Columbia, Ahmadinejad said, oh no, we don’t have those kind of people in Iran. The crowd burst out laughing at how ridiculous and homophobic the statement was. That is how out of touch the Republican Party is today. No gays in Iran. No gays in the Republican Party.

PS Sam speculated that the person who had the enormous juice to set that gay prostitute up with a phony security clearance and press pass for hundreds of “social visits” to the White House is none other than Rove. That would be the ultimate irony. The master gay basher – the biggest of them all – pulling hundreds of Larry Craig’s in the White House. Seder speculated that shortly after the gay prostitute in the White House scandal a story was floated that Rove was having a heterosexual affair to act as cover for Rove’s real sexual orientation. It reminds me of hearing Palast say after reading hundreds of Rove’s emails which he accidentally sent to the wrong address (a friend of Palast’s), that he would not comment on Rove’s sexual orientation. Palast said it in such a way that raised an issue in my mind. Normally I couldn’t care less about a person’s sexual orientation, but it would be highly relevant for Rove because he is the ringleader of gay bashers in the Republican Party. Rove put the issue in play. Anyway, it’s all speculation, just based on someone else’s public statement.

Comment by Zooey — September 29, 2007 @ 7:11 pm

He’s a manly man’s con, Zooey. He’s making his own reality, just like Fox News and Bush Admin. That’s why nothing gets across to him. You can call him on his lies a hundred times, document ‘em endlessly, and he’s just going keep repeating them. He thinks if he says it enough times, it’ll become true, because he says so.

He’s a stone fraud, period.

Please feel free to copy and paste this on every thread Li’L Footie shows up on. Mebbe we can laugh him offa this site.

Comment by The Republic of Stupidity — September 29, 2007 @ 9:06 pm

America will be a third world country by the time we pay off that 9 trillion dollar deficit.

Winning in Iraq is the issue, money should not be an issue in that cause. Borrow more if need be.

If you borrow more, you decrease the value of dollar.

Subprime loans: People shouldn’t have borrowed what they couldn’t pay back.

The lenders shouldn’t have made loans to people who couldn’t afford them.

The problem is minor and is being worked on by both loan companies and the Federal Government.

I think we have a major problem on our hands. And I don’t think the government should be helping any lenders who made loans people who couldn’t afford them.

Buy a house for a place to live, not as an investment you think you are going to make money from. Net effect to the economy: negligable.

The economy depends on people taking equity out of their homes and spending the money.

Health Care: Red Herring issue. Health care is fine in this country. Only liberal scare tactics try to make this an issue.

Nah, There’s a crisis.

Civil Liberties: No erosion, no issue. You have more freedom today than the day Bush took office.

Nah, there has been erosions.

The “Unitary Executive”: Non-issue.

Nah, big issue.

Comment by O. Bigfoot — September 29, 2007 @ 8:11 pm

Wow! Listen to him describe himself w/ such candor and accuracy…

Comment by gummitch — September 29, 2007 @ 8:31 pm

That’s not “sand” he’s got his head stuck in, or, perhaps “UP” would be more descriptive…

Comment by O. Bigfoot — September 29, 2007 @ 8:34 pm

Sorry, you poor, deluded liar. All the numbers were far better under Clinton. i know it’s uncomfortable for a loser like you to admit, but it’s just a fact. All the numbers were better under Clinton. 8 years of peace and prosperity, what a horrible nightmare for you rightard whackjobs. Republicans are fiscally reckless, failures at national defense, and perverts on a universal scale. No wonder you don’t want to look at the truth, you’d shoot yourself.

Comment by O. Bigfoot — September 29, 2007 @ 8:34 pm

Irony piled on irony.

Would you suggest news sources like, oh, NewsMax or the Grudge Report? Because we certainly wouldn’t want to be stuck with a bunch of “talking points.” We want to be a genius like you!

As opposed to Bill Kristol and the Neocons’ vision of a “New America”?

Comment by O. Bigfoot — September 29, 2007 @ 8:21 pm

Run off quickly, because none of your “facts” stand any scrutiny at all, even when you attempt to offer “facts” rather than your retarded “non-issue” response. Clearly, you’re more than happy with the notion of an over-powering executive, you’re in denial about the state of the armed forces (ask the generals how prepared we are), you’ve got health coverage so tough noogies for everyone else, ditto the poor saps encouraged by the head of the federal reserve to take the subprime loans handed out by the fed head’s pals, and the massive debt being created by this “conservative” administration is no concern to you because, hell, you’ll be dead and those aren’t really your kids anyway.

You’re a great example of a pathetic, head-in-the-sand pseudo-conservative. Enjoy your steaks.

There, now I’m a Republican.