<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Harkin: &#8216;Maybe Limbaugh was high on drugs again.&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/01/harkin-maybe-limbaugh-was-high-on-drugs-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/01/harkin-maybe-limbaugh-was-high-on-drugs-again/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:09:15 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: richg</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/01/harkin-maybe-limbaugh-was-high-on-drugs-again/comment-page-16/#comment-4108623</link>
		<dc:creator>richg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 01:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/10/01/harkin-maybe-limbaugh-was-high-on-drugs-again/#comment-4108623</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;
By JOSE LAMBIET

Palm Beach Post Staff Writer

Friday, October 05, 2007

No, Sen. Tom Harkin, radio talker Rush Limbaugh isn&#039;t back on drugs!   So says the state of Florida.&lt;/em&gt;
.........
Now, what do you say?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><br />
By JOSE LAMBIET</p>
<p>Palm Beach Post Staff Writer</p>
<p>Friday, October 05, 2007</p>
<p>No, Sen. Tom Harkin, radio talker Rush Limbaugh isn&#8217;t back on drugs!   So says the state of Florida.</em><br />
&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;<br />
Now, what do you say?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4108623', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hotelcali4nia1</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/01/harkin-maybe-limbaugh-was-high-on-drugs-again/comment-page-16/#comment-4102985</link>
		<dc:creator>hotelcali4nia1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 13:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/10/01/harkin-maybe-limbaugh-was-high-on-drugs-again/#comment-4102985</guid>
		<description>The only comment that comes to mind is that anyone that truly believes Rush diparaged our soldiers needs to take another long pull on their cup of Kool-Aid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only comment that comes to mind is that anyone that truly believes Rush diparaged our soldiers needs to take another long pull on their cup of Kool-Aid.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4102985', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rusty1</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/01/harkin-maybe-limbaugh-was-high-on-drugs-again/comment-page-16/#comment-4102969</link>
		<dc:creator>Rusty1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 12:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/10/01/harkin-maybe-limbaugh-was-high-on-drugs-again/#comment-4102969</guid>
		<description>I think this article says it all. 
By Noel Sheppard &#124; October 2, 2007 - 11:39 ET 

On Monday, Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) stepped onto the floor of the Senate and strongly denounced talk radio host Rush Limbaugh for what have proven to be out of context statements made by the conservative personality on his program last Wednesday. 

Yet, with the exception of a CNN segment aired Monday, and articles by Fox News, USA Today&#039;s On Politics blog, The Hill, NewsMax, and the New York Post, virtually no major media outlets covered Reid&#039;s statements.

Not the New York Times. Not the Washington Post. Ditto all three broadcast network evening news programs Monday, and the Associated Press.

This raises an important question:

AdvertisementHave most major press outlets correctly concluded that the leftwing organization Media Matters did indeed cherry-pick and misrepresent Limbaugh&#039;s statements thereby making earlier reports on the subject erroneous?

Or, did they recognize how hypocritical it would be to castigate Limbaugh for basically reiterating what ABC&#039;s Brian Ross and Charles Gibson reported last Monday evening just two days before Rush made his statements?

Of course, a more cynical view would be that the media - now that it has been shown that Democrat presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton admitted her connection to Media Matters - want to bury this story as quickly as possible so as to shelter her and her husband from any scrutiny concerning these ties.

Regardless of the reason, there&#039;s been a peculiar silence regarding Reid&#039;s statements Monday, and, although the leftwing organization VoteVets.org is about to run a rather disgraceful ad denouncing Limbaugh, most media outlets appear to be running away from this story as fast as they can.

Whether this continues is anyone&#039;s guess, as is the cause.

Stay tuned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this article says it all.<br />
By Noel Sheppard | October 2, 2007 &#8211; 11:39 ET </p>
<p>On Monday, Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) stepped onto the floor of the Senate and strongly denounced talk radio host Rush Limbaugh for what have proven to be out of context statements made by the conservative personality on his program last Wednesday. </p>
<p>Yet, with the exception of a CNN segment aired Monday, and articles by Fox News, USA Today&#8217;s On Politics blog, The Hill, NewsMax, and the New York Post, virtually no major media outlets covered Reid&#8217;s statements.</p>
<p>Not the New York Times. Not the Washington Post. Ditto all three broadcast network evening news programs Monday, and the Associated Press.</p>
<p>This raises an important question:</p>
<p>AdvertisementHave most major press outlets correctly concluded that the leftwing organization Media Matters did indeed cherry-pick and misrepresent Limbaugh&#8217;s statements thereby making earlier reports on the subject erroneous?</p>
<p>Or, did they recognize how hypocritical it would be to castigate Limbaugh for basically reiterating what ABC&#8217;s Brian Ross and Charles Gibson reported last Monday evening just two days before Rush made his statements?</p>
<p>Of course, a more cynical view would be that the media &#8211; now that it has been shown that Democrat presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton admitted her connection to Media Matters &#8211; want to bury this story as quickly as possible so as to shelter her and her husband from any scrutiny concerning these ties.</p>
<p>Regardless of the reason, there&#8217;s been a peculiar silence regarding Reid&#8217;s statements Monday, and, although the leftwing organization VoteVets.org is about to run a rather disgraceful ad denouncing Limbaugh, most media outlets appear to be running away from this story as fast as they can.</p>
<p>Whether this continues is anyone&#8217;s guess, as is the cause.</p>
<p>Stay tuned.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4102969', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rusty1</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/01/harkin-maybe-limbaugh-was-high-on-drugs-again/comment-page-16/#comment-4102967</link>
		<dc:creator>Rusty1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 12:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/10/01/harkin-maybe-limbaugh-was-high-on-drugs-again/#comment-4102967</guid>
		<description>What is really interesting about this whole discussion is the fact that a week before Rush mentioned the &quot;Phoney Soldier&quot; phrase, the news did a big report on the Phoney Soldiers&quot; but nobody condemed the media about that. But let a conservative say it and the s%^t hits the fan. Talk about double standards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is really interesting about this whole discussion is the fact that a week before Rush mentioned the &#8220;Phoney Soldier&#8221; phrase, the news did a big report on the Phoney Soldiers&#8221; but nobody condemed the media about that. But let a conservative say it and the s%^t hits the fan. Talk about double standards.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4102967', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: obsolete</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/01/harkin-maybe-limbaugh-was-high-on-drugs-again/comment-page-16/#comment-4102958</link>
		<dc:creator>obsolete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 11:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/10/01/harkin-maybe-limbaugh-was-high-on-drugs-again/#comment-4102958</guid>
		<description>Wow,
Glad I don&#039;t have to clean up now that all the sh*t-flinging Repub monkeys are done parading through here. This was definately the &quot;C&quot; team, as their talking points were stale and have lost their effectiveness (Clinton! Commies! Surrender monkeys! etc.).
The Concern Trollsâ„¢ were especially poor (&quot;As a lifelong Democrat, I sometimes wish we didn&#039;t hate America and love Osama so much...&quot;).

My Conclusion? These republic wingnuts hate at least 50% of their fellow Americans more than they hate Al Qaeda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow,<br />
Glad I don&#8217;t have to clean up now that all the sh*t-flinging Repub monkeys are done parading through here. This was definately the &#8220;C&#8221; team, as their talking points were stale and have lost their effectiveness (Clinton! Commies! Surrender monkeys! etc.).<br />
The Concern Trollsâ„¢ were especially poor (&#8221;As a lifelong Democrat, I sometimes wish we didn&#8217;t hate America and love Osama so much&#8230;&#8221;).</p>
<p>My Conclusion? These republic wingnuts hate at least 50% of their fellow Americans more than they hate Al Qaeda.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4102958', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barfly</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/01/harkin-maybe-limbaugh-was-high-on-drugs-again/comment-page-16/#comment-4102393</link>
		<dc:creator>barfly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 01:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/10/01/harkin-maybe-limbaugh-was-high-on-drugs-again/#comment-4102393</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a question.

If your doctor was revealed to be a drug addict, and had been treating your family for years while he was high, would you still use him?

Judging by the synchophantic chorus, I guess the answer would be &quot;yes.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a question.</p>
<p>If your doctor was revealed to be a drug addict, and had been treating your family for years while he was high, would you still use him?</p>
<p>Judging by the synchophantic chorus, I guess the answer would be &#8220;yes.&#8221;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4102393', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane E. Gaffigan</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/01/harkin-maybe-limbaugh-was-high-on-drugs-again/comment-page-16/#comment-4102371</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane E. Gaffigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 01:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/10/01/harkin-maybe-limbaugh-was-high-on-drugs-again/#comment-4102371</guid>
		<description>kmpk, I&#039;m afraid reasonable arguments fall on deaf ears here.  Neither logic nor truth are heeded by Democrats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kmpk, I&#8217;m afraid reasonable arguments fall on deaf ears here.  Neither logic nor truth are heeded by Democrats.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4102371', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kmpk</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/01/harkin-maybe-limbaugh-was-high-on-drugs-again/comment-page-16/#comment-4102274</link>
		<dc:creator>kmpk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 00:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/10/01/harkin-maybe-limbaugh-was-high-on-drugs-again/#comment-4102274</guid>
		<description>You Democrats/Leftwingers hate Limbaugh so much you will grab on to anything in the hopes of discrediting him.  To bad so sad, your twisting and spinning has been revealed for what it is.  A lie.  The transcripts show Rush is right and once again you are wrong.  You tried to make an issue out of the Joke song, &quot;Obama the Magic Negro&quot; and paint Rush as a biggot.  That didn&#039;t work either because a black columnist called Obama that in a News Column.   Rush is to smart for you leftist idiots.  You can&#039;t beat him in the arena of Ideas so you try to smear him.   Rush is fighting back.  He has once again demonstrated to the American people just how viscious and how low liberals will stoop to gain power in this country.

There are &quot;phony soldiers&quot; out there that liberals have held up as genuine in order to push for American Defeat. ABC has done stories on phony soldiers.

When a leading Democrat says that good news from Iraq is bad for Democrats.  I have to wonder whose side Democrats are on.  They certianly aren&#039;t on America&#039;s side. Winning in Iraq is good. American Victory is good.   You people make me sick.  You want power for yourselves at any price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You Democrats/Leftwingers hate Limbaugh so much you will grab on to anything in the hopes of discrediting him.  To bad so sad, your twisting and spinning has been revealed for what it is.  A lie.  The transcripts show Rush is right and once again you are wrong.  You tried to make an issue out of the Joke song, &#8220;Obama the Magic Negro&#8221; and paint Rush as a biggot.  That didn&#8217;t work either because a black columnist called Obama that in a News Column.   Rush is to smart for you leftist idiots.  You can&#8217;t beat him in the arena of Ideas so you try to smear him.   Rush is fighting back.  He has once again demonstrated to the American people just how viscious and how low liberals will stoop to gain power in this country.</p>
<p>There are &#8220;phony soldiers&#8221; out there that liberals have held up as genuine in order to push for American Defeat. ABC has done stories on phony soldiers.</p>
<p>When a leading Democrat says that good news from Iraq is bad for Democrats.  I have to wonder whose side Democrats are on.  They certianly aren&#8217;t on America&#8217;s side. Winning in Iraq is good. American Victory is good.   You people make me sick.  You want power for yourselves at any price.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4102274', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: conservativemom</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/01/harkin-maybe-limbaugh-was-high-on-drugs-again/comment-page-16/#comment-4102120</link>
		<dc:creator>conservativemom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 23:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/10/01/harkin-maybe-limbaugh-was-high-on-drugs-again/#comment-4102120</guid>
		<description>CW02 sends...
Thank you so much for the sacrifices you have made for our country.  You and all of the other soldiers are in my prayers daily.  You have far more people supporting you and backing you than you can imagine and the leftists love to report.  Thank you for speaking you peace on this site.
God bless you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CW02 sends&#8230;<br />
Thank you so much for the sacrifices you have made for our country.  You and all of the other soldiers are in my prayers daily.  You have far more people supporting you and backing you than you can imagine and the leftists love to report.  Thank you for speaking you peace on this site.<br />
God bless you!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4102120', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YosemiteFudd</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/01/harkin-maybe-limbaugh-was-high-on-drugs-again/comment-page-16/#comment-4102095</link>
		<dc:creator>YosemiteFudd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 23:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/10/01/harkin-maybe-limbaugh-was-high-on-drugs-again/#comment-4102095</guid>
		<description>Hee-hee, nothing gets liberals ranting, raving, and frothing at the mouth -- and adopting a self-righteous, sanctimonious, finger-wagging demeanor over their usual spineless, wishy-washy, verbally and factually challenged disposition -- than the mere suggestion (however contrived) that Limbaugh might have said something that could possibly serve to compromise his popularity and credibility. You lefties really are beside yourselves, shaking in your shoes and trembling with rage, when it comes to right-wing media and the remarkable amount of resonance enjoyed by conservative broadcasts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hee-hee, nothing gets liberals ranting, raving, and frothing at the mouth &#8212; and adopting a self-righteous, sanctimonious, finger-wagging demeanor over their usual spineless, wishy-washy, verbally and factually challenged disposition &#8212; than the mere suggestion (however contrived) that Limbaugh might have said something that could possibly serve to compromise his popularity and credibility. You lefties really are beside yourselves, shaking in your shoes and trembling with rage, when it comes to right-wing media and the remarkable amount of resonance enjoyed by conservative broadcasts.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4102095', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: conservativemom</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/01/harkin-maybe-limbaugh-was-high-on-drugs-again/comment-page-16/#comment-4102088</link>
		<dc:creator>conservativemom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 23:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/10/01/harkin-maybe-limbaugh-was-high-on-drugs-again/#comment-4102088</guid>
		<description>Senators and leftists, you should be ashamed of yourself for not reading the entire transcript of Mr. Limbaugh&#039;s.  If you did, then you would surely know that he was NOT making a derogatory remark about all of the soldiers being &quot;phony&quot;, but only those who are actually being investigated for fraud (pretending to be a soldier who served in the war when they never even made it out of boot camp.)  

It is the leftists (including some senators) who have bashed our troops over and over and over again!  No one &quot;demanded&quot; an apology from any of them.  But Mr. Limbaugh gets on a hot topic about a &quot;phony soldier&quot; (you know, one that pretends they served in the war, but never made it out of boot camp) and some lamebrain has to cut and paste the transcript in such a way as to make it appear one of the most pro-troops persons in America was degrading our soldier?!?  Shame on all of you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senators and leftists, you should be ashamed of yourself for not reading the entire transcript of Mr. Limbaugh&#8217;s.  If you did, then you would surely know that he was NOT making a derogatory remark about all of the soldiers being &#8220;phony&#8221;, but only those who are actually being investigated for fraud (pretending to be a soldier who served in the war when they never even made it out of boot camp.)  </p>
<p>It is the leftists (including some senators) who have bashed our troops over and over and over again!  No one &#8220;demanded&#8221; an apology from any of them.  But Mr. Limbaugh gets on a hot topic about a &#8220;phony soldier&#8221; (you know, one that pretends they served in the war, but never made it out of boot camp) and some lamebrain has to cut and paste the transcript in such a way as to make it appear one of the most pro-troops persons in America was degrading our soldier?!?  Shame on all of you!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4102088', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snuffy Smith</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/01/harkin-maybe-limbaugh-was-high-on-drugs-again/comment-page-16/#comment-4102024</link>
		<dc:creator>Snuffy Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 22:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/10/01/harkin-maybe-limbaugh-was-high-on-drugs-again/#comment-4102024</guid>
		<description>I dont know wich is worse the wacky democrats or the miligment scourge in the middle east.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont know wich is worse the wacky democrats or the miligment scourge in the middle east.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4102024', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davidknows</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/01/harkin-maybe-limbaugh-was-high-on-drugs-again/comment-page-16/#comment-4101995</link>
		<dc:creator>Davidknows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 22:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/10/01/harkin-maybe-limbaugh-was-high-on-drugs-again/#comment-4101995</guid>
		<description>So, a &quot;real soldier is proud to serve, they want to be over in Iraq, they understand their sacrifice and they&#039;re willing to sacrifice for their country.&quot;
And what if a soldier is all that -- and still believes the war is wrong, as for example, Pat Tillman did. He felt the invasion of a soverign nation like Iraq was completely wrong. He did however believe we had a right and an obligation to destroy the Taliban who had offered support to the killers of 9/11. So how about it? Is Pat Tillman a phoney soldier?

I&#039;m not accusing anyone of lying by the way. That is a word you people use all the time when you don&#039;t want to deal with the facts. When the facts fail to support your argument you immediately attack the facts. At no point have any of you found a single fact I&#039;ve written to be false. Not one. You may disagree with my conclusion, I understand you can see it your way. It&#039;s not right but it&#039;s not completely illogical. But I wouldn&#039;t call you a liar for supporting Rush, I would simply call you a Dittohead. To me, that&#039;s a much greater insult.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, a &#8220;real soldier is proud to serve, they want to be over in Iraq, they understand their sacrifice and they&#8217;re willing to sacrifice for their country.&#8221;<br />
And what if a soldier is all that &#8212; and still believes the war is wrong, as for example, Pat Tillman did. He felt the invasion of a soverign nation like Iraq was completely wrong. He did however believe we had a right and an obligation to destroy the Taliban who had offered support to the killers of 9/11. So how about it? Is Pat Tillman a phoney soldier?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not accusing anyone of lying by the way. That is a word you people use all the time when you don&#8217;t want to deal with the facts. When the facts fail to support your argument you immediately attack the facts. At no point have any of you found a single fact I&#8217;ve written to be false. Not one. You may disagree with my conclusion, I understand you can see it your way. It&#8217;s not right but it&#8217;s not completely illogical. But I wouldn&#8217;t call you a liar for supporting Rush, I would simply call you a Dittohead. To me, that&#8217;s a much greater insult.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4101995', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kmpk</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/01/harkin-maybe-limbaugh-was-high-on-drugs-again/comment-page-16/#comment-4101958</link>
		<dc:creator>kmpk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 21:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/10/01/harkin-maybe-limbaugh-was-high-on-drugs-again/#comment-4101958</guid>
		<description>For up to date Liberal/Democratic talking points tune into Radio Havana Cuba.  Not only will you hear Democratic Talking Points Cuba Style.  You&#039;ll also hear Hugo Chavez&#039;s Democratic talking Points.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For up to date Liberal/Democratic talking points tune into Radio Havana Cuba.  Not only will you hear Democratic Talking Points Cuba Style.  You&#8217;ll also hear Hugo Chavez&#8217;s Democratic talking Points.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4101958', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmurdock36</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/01/harkin-maybe-limbaugh-was-high-on-drugs-again/comment-page-16/#comment-4101936</link>
		<dc:creator>dmurdock36</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 21:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/10/01/harkin-maybe-limbaugh-was-high-on-drugs-again/#comment-4101936</guid>
		<description>Well I gotta go it just go busy at work I have to go to work so I can pay for all of you Liberals health care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I gotta go it just go busy at work I have to go to work so I can pay for all of you Liberals health care.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4101936', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmurdock36</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/01/harkin-maybe-limbaugh-was-high-on-drugs-again/comment-page-16/#comment-4101922</link>
		<dc:creator>dmurdock36</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 21:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/10/01/harkin-maybe-limbaugh-was-high-on-drugs-again/#comment-4101922</guid>
		<description>as you can see the pause before mentioning the phony soldier Macbeth was caused because Rush was addressing what the caller was saying but as soon as he had addressed the callers question he went on to explain about the phony soldier and only a liberal could missinterpret this as referring to any soldier that disagrees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as you can see the pause before mentioning the phony soldier Macbeth was caused because Rush was addressing what the caller was saying but as soon as he had addressed the callers question he went on to explain about the phony soldier and only a liberal could missinterpret this as referring to any soldier that disagrees.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4101922', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmurdock36</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/01/harkin-maybe-limbaugh-was-high-on-drugs-again/comment-page-16/#comment-4101913</link>
		<dc:creator>dmurdock36</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 21:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/10/01/harkin-maybe-limbaugh-was-high-on-drugs-again/#comment-4101913</guid>
		<description>oh I am tired of you so here it is exactly what was said.

RUSH:  There&#039;s a lot more than that that they don&#039;t understand.  The next guy that calls here I&#039;m going to ask them, &quot;What is the imperative of pulling out?  What&#039;s in it for the United States to pull out?&quot;  I don&#039;t think they have an answer for that other than, &quot;When&#039;s he going to bring the troops home? Keep the troops safe,&quot; whatever.  

CALLER:  Yeah.

RUSH:  It&#039;s not possible intellectually to follow these people.

CALLER:  No, it&#039;s not.  And what&#039;s really funny is they never talk to real soldiers.  They pull these soldiers that come up out of the blue and spout to the media.

RUSH:  The phony soldiers.

CALLER:  Phony soldiers.  If you talk to any real soldier and they&#039;re proud to serve, they want to be over in Iraq, they understand their sacrifice and they&#039;re willing to sacrifice for the country.

RUSH:  They joined to be in Iraq.

CALLER:  A lot of people.

RUSH:  You know where you&#039;re going these days, the last four years, if you sign up.  The odds are you&#039;re going there or Afghanistan, or somewhere.

CALLER:  Exactly, sir.  My other comment, my original comment, was a retort to Jill about the fact we didn&#039;t find any weapons of mass destruction.  Actually, we have found weapons of mass destruction in chemical agents that terrorists have been using against us for a while now.  I&#039;ve done two tours in Iraq, I just got back in June, and there are many instances of insurgents not knowing what they&#039;re using in their IEDs.  They&#039;re using mustard artillery rounds, VX artillery rounds in their IEDs.  Because they didn&#039;t know what they were using, they didn&#039;t do it right, and so it didn&#039;t really hurt anybody.  But those munitions are over there.  It&#039;s a huge desert. If they bury it somewhere, we&#039;re never going to find it.

RUSH:  Well, that&#039;s a moot point for me right now.

CALLER:  Right.
RUSH:  The weapons of mass destruction.  We gotta get beyond that.  We&#039;re there.  We all know they were there, and Mahmoud even admitted it in one of his speeches here talking about Saddam using the poison mustard gas or whatever it is on his own people.  But that&#039;s moot.  What&#039;s more important is all this is taking place now in the midst of the surge working, and all of these anti-war Democrats are getting even more hell-bent on pulling out of there, which means that success on the part of you and your colleagues over there is a great threat to them.  It&#039;s frustrating and maddening, and why they must be kept in the minority.  I want to thank you, Mike, for calling.  I appreciate it very much.  

Here is a Morning Update that we did recently, talking about fake soldiers.  This is a story of who the left props up as heroes.  They have their celebrities and one of them was Army Ranger Jesse Macbeth.  Now, he was a &quot;corporal.&quot;  I say in quotes.  Twenty-three years old.  What made Jesse Macbeth a hero to the anti-war crowd wasn&#039;t his Purple Heart; it wasn&#039;t his being affiliated with post-traumatic stress disorder from tours in Afghanistan and Iraq.  No. What made Jesse Macbeth, Army Ranger, a hero to the left was his courage, in their view, off the battlefield, without regard to consequences.  He told the world the abuses he had witnessed in Iraq, American soldiers killing unarmed civilians, hundreds of men, women, even children.  In one gruesome account, translated into Arabic and spread widely across the Internet, Army Ranger Jesse Macbeth describes the horrors this way:  &quot;We would burn their bodies.  We would hang their bodies from the rafters in the mosque.&quot; 

I stopped here. because if you read this you will see what he is talking about and he at no time refers to all soldiers that are against the ware as being phony he only refers to phony soldiers being those that are truly phony</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh I am tired of you so here it is exactly what was said.</p>
<p>RUSH:  There&#8217;s a lot more than that that they don&#8217;t understand.  The next guy that calls here I&#8217;m going to ask them, &#8220;What is the imperative of pulling out?  What&#8217;s in it for the United States to pull out?&#8221;  I don&#8217;t think they have an answer for that other than, &#8220;When&#8217;s he going to bring the troops home? Keep the troops safe,&#8221; whatever.  </p>
<p>CALLER:  Yeah.</p>
<p>RUSH:  It&#8217;s not possible intellectually to follow these people.</p>
<p>CALLER:  No, it&#8217;s not.  And what&#8217;s really funny is they never talk to real soldiers.  They pull these soldiers that come up out of the blue and spout to the media.</p>
<p>RUSH:  The phony soldiers.</p>
<p>CALLER:  Phony soldiers.  If you talk to any real soldier and they&#8217;re proud to serve, they want to be over in Iraq, they understand their sacrifice and they&#8217;re willing to sacrifice for the country.</p>
<p>RUSH:  They joined to be in Iraq.</p>
<p>CALLER:  A lot of people.</p>
<p>RUSH:  You know where you&#8217;re going these days, the last four years, if you sign up.  The odds are you&#8217;re going there or Afghanistan, or somewhere.</p>
<p>CALLER:  Exactly, sir.  My other comment, my original comment, was a retort to Jill about the fact we didn&#8217;t find any weapons of mass destruction.  Actually, we have found weapons of mass destruction in chemical agents that terrorists have been using against us for a while now.  I&#8217;ve done two tours in Iraq, I just got back in June, and there are many instances of insurgents not knowing what they&#8217;re using in their IEDs.  They&#8217;re using mustard artillery rounds, VX artillery rounds in their IEDs.  Because they didn&#8217;t know what they were using, they didn&#8217;t do it right, and so it didn&#8217;t really hurt anybody.  But those munitions are over there.  It&#8217;s a huge desert. If they bury it somewhere, we&#8217;re never going to find it.</p>
<p>RUSH:  Well, that&#8217;s a moot point for me right now.</p>
<p>CALLER:  Right.<br />
RUSH:  The weapons of mass destruction.  We gotta get beyond that.  We&#8217;re there.  We all know they were there, and Mahmoud even admitted it in one of his speeches here talking about Saddam using the poison mustard gas or whatever it is on his own people.  But that&#8217;s moot.  What&#8217;s more important is all this is taking place now in the midst of the surge working, and all of these anti-war Democrats are getting even more hell-bent on pulling out of there, which means that success on the part of you and your colleagues over there is a great threat to them.  It&#8217;s frustrating and maddening, and why they must be kept in the minority.  I want to thank you, Mike, for calling.  I appreciate it very much.  </p>
<p>Here is a Morning Update that we did recently, talking about fake soldiers.  This is a story of who the left props up as heroes.  They have their celebrities and one of them was Army Ranger Jesse Macbeth.  Now, he was a &#8220;corporal.&#8221;  I say in quotes.  Twenty-three years old.  What made Jesse Macbeth a hero to the anti-war crowd wasn&#8217;t his Purple Heart; it wasn&#8217;t his being affiliated with post-traumatic stress disorder from tours in Afghanistan and Iraq.  No. What made Jesse Macbeth, Army Ranger, a hero to the left was his courage, in their view, off the battlefield, without regard to consequences.  He told the world the abuses he had witnessed in Iraq, American soldiers killing unarmed civilians, hundreds of men, women, even children.  In one gruesome account, translated into Arabic and spread widely across the Internet, Army Ranger Jesse Macbeth describes the horrors this way:  &#8220;We would burn their bodies.  We would hang their bodies from the rafters in the mosque.&#8221; </p>
<p>I stopped here. because if you read this you will see what he is talking about and he at no time refers to all soldiers that are against the ware as being phony he only refers to phony soldiers being those that are truly phony<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4101913', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kmpk</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/01/harkin-maybe-limbaugh-was-high-on-drugs-again/comment-page-15/#comment-4101882</link>
		<dc:creator>kmpk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 21:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/10/01/harkin-maybe-limbaugh-was-high-on-drugs-again/#comment-4101882</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t it amazing that Osama Bin Ladin&#039;s talking points in his last public statement sounded like they could have been written by Howard Dean Himself.  Democratic Leadership in this country have done nothing but provide aid and comfort to these animals.

In fact the Democrats have provided aid and comfort to most of our enemies.  Their words are echoed back in these countries public statements denouncing the United States.  Give a listen to Communist Cuba Radio.  Radio Havana sounds like a Democratic Party Commercial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it amazing that Osama Bin Ladin&#8217;s talking points in his last public statement sounded like they could have been written by Howard Dean Himself.  Democratic Leadership in this country have done nothing but provide aid and comfort to these animals.</p>
<p>In fact the Democrats have provided aid and comfort to most of our enemies.  Their words are echoed back in these countries public statements denouncing the United States.  Give a listen to Communist Cuba Radio.  Radio Havana sounds like a Democratic Party Commercial.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4101882', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davidknows</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/01/harkin-maybe-limbaugh-was-high-on-drugs-again/comment-page-15/#comment-4101835</link>
		<dc:creator>Davidknows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 21:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/10/01/harkin-maybe-limbaugh-was-high-on-drugs-again/#comment-4101835</guid>
		<description>sad sad dmurdock, let me go through it again and please, don&#039;t let the facts hit you in the ass. A liar is someone who doesn&#039;t tell the truth. The truth is that Rush referred to phoney soldiers one minute and 50 seconds before mentioning MacBeth&#039;s name for the first time, and one his website he eliminated that one minute and 50 seconds. Now if you choose to deny that, that&#039;s simply irrational. If you say it didn&#039;t happen, that&#039;s a lie. But there is no possible way simply stating the facts as they exist is a lie -- unless you don&#039;t want reality to be true, in which case you&#039;re a conservative.

Rush scare me? Are you kidding? As Keith Olberman correctly refers to him, he&#039;s a comedian. And you Dittohead, his joke is on you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sad sad dmurdock, let me go through it again and please, don&#8217;t let the facts hit you in the ass. A liar is someone who doesn&#8217;t tell the truth. The truth is that Rush referred to phoney soldiers one minute and 50 seconds before mentioning MacBeth&#8217;s name for the first time, and one his website he eliminated that one minute and 50 seconds. Now if you choose to deny that, that&#8217;s simply irrational. If you say it didn&#8217;t happen, that&#8217;s a lie. But there is no possible way simply stating the facts as they exist is a lie &#8212; unless you don&#8217;t want reality to be true, in which case you&#8217;re a conservative.</p>
<p>Rush scare me? Are you kidding? As Keith Olberman correctly refers to him, he&#8217;s a comedian. And you Dittohead, his joke is on you.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4101835', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kmpk</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/01/harkin-maybe-limbaugh-was-high-on-drugs-again/comment-page-15/#comment-4101833</link>
		<dc:creator>kmpk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 21:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/10/01/harkin-maybe-limbaugh-was-high-on-drugs-again/#comment-4101833</guid>
		<description>Rush has received has been honored by many veteran and current serving military groups for his unwavering support of the military.  He is a champion of the US Military and supports them and thier mission to the hilt.  His radio show is the most requested show by armed service personnel all over the world.  Bill Clinton has written that he &quot;Loathed the Military&quot;.  Democrats know they are not cared for by the military.  Hell if only the military voted we probably wouldn&#039;t have any elected democrats.  That is why Democrats tried to keep Military Service Personnel Absentee ballots from being counted in the 2000 Presidential Election in Florida.  Face it you libs.  The country knows and the Military knows you are not thier friends.  

For God sakes,  could you imagine a political party during World War II saying &quot;We&#039;ve Lost&quot; when military personnel were in harms way.  Back in the 40&#039;s that would be treason.

Well Harry Ried and the rest of the Democratic Leadership have said, &quot;We&#039;ve Lost the War&quot;.  There is not one of you Liberal Democratic Idiots that can defend these unconscionable statements.  Statements like this undermine the mission, the president and give aid and comfort to the enemy.  This is the ultimate in unpatriotic behavior.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rush has received has been honored by many veteran and current serving military groups for his unwavering support of the military.  He is a champion of the US Military and supports them and thier mission to the hilt.  His radio show is the most requested show by armed service personnel all over the world.  Bill Clinton has written that he &#8220;Loathed the Military&#8221;.  Democrats know they are not cared for by the military.  Hell if only the military voted we probably wouldn&#8217;t have any elected democrats.  That is why Democrats tried to keep Military Service Personnel Absentee ballots from being counted in the 2000 Presidential Election in Florida.  Face it you libs.  The country knows and the Military knows you are not thier friends.  </p>
<p>For God sakes,  could you imagine a political party during World War II saying &#8220;We&#8217;ve Lost&#8221; when military personnel were in harms way.  Back in the 40&#8217;s that would be treason.</p>
<p>Well Harry Ried and the rest of the Democratic Leadership have said, &#8220;We&#8217;ve Lost the War&#8221;.  There is not one of you Liberal Democratic Idiots that can defend these unconscionable statements.  Statements like this undermine the mission, the president and give aid and comfort to the enemy.  This is the ultimate in unpatriotic behavior.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4101833', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
