<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bush&#8217;s approval rating hits new low.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 05:09:42 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: texaslady</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/comment-page-3/#comment-4107537</link>
		<dc:creator>texaslady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 15:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/#comment-4107537</guid>
		<description>#126 - Where do you come up with your ideas ?  Warren Buffington, Bill Clinton, Bill Maher, John Kerry  have ALL stated they DO NOT  pay the same in taxes as people from $35,000 to $400,000 a year.   This group is carrying the most in tax.

Check how much Dick Cheney and Bush paid last year, it is public information you would have your eyes opened wide.   

The difference between a progressive and a conservative, progressives  use facts to think with conservatives just run their mouth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#126 &#8211; Where do you come up with your ideas ?  Warren Buffington, Bill Clinton, Bill Maher, John Kerry  have ALL stated they DO NOT  pay the same in taxes as people from $35,000 to $400,000 a year.   This group is carrying the most in tax.</p>
<p>Check how much Dick Cheney and Bush paid last year, it is public information you would have your eyes opened wide.   </p>
<p>The difference between a progressive and a conservative, progressives  use facts to think with conservatives just run their mouth.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4107537', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chocolate Jesus</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/comment-page-3/#comment-4107304</link>
		<dc:creator>Chocolate Jesus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 08:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/#comment-4107304</guid>
		<description>&gt;and the mainstream/liberal media.

uh huh. how much airplay the &quot;liberal media&quot; give the &quot;cheney said invading iraq would be a quagmire in 94&#039; &quot; story?

how many times did our liberal media point out that memeber of the bush regimed LIED by saying &quot;we know where the weapons are&quot; ..&quot;we know without a doubt that saddam has WMD&quot;

&gt; all this b.s. like â€œthe rich donâ€™t pay taxesâ€ doesnâ€™t fly.

they should pay the same percentage as poor people im sure.
 because people like bill gates don&#039;t get any more benefits from the pre-existing highways, telephone lines, internet, and other societal structures than the average factory worker does. 

by the way, bin laden agrees with you that taxes in this country are &quot;insanely high&quot;, and he further advocates taxes in this country should be replaced by a 2.5 percent flat tax. do you agree?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;and the mainstream/liberal media.</p>
<p>uh huh. how much airplay the &#8220;liberal media&#8221; give the &#8220;cheney said invading iraq would be a quagmire in 94&#8242; &#8221; story?</p>
<p>how many times did our liberal media point out that memeber of the bush regimed LIED by saying &#8220;we know where the weapons are&#8221; ..&#8221;we know without a doubt that saddam has WMD&#8221;</p>
<p>&gt; all this b.s. like â€œthe rich donâ€™t pay taxesâ€ doesnâ€™t fly.</p>
<p>they should pay the same percentage as poor people im sure.<br />
 because people like bill gates don&#8217;t get any more benefits from the pre-existing highways, telephone lines, internet, and other societal structures than the average factory worker does. </p>
<p>by the way, bin laden agrees with you that taxes in this country are &#8220;insanely high&#8221;, and he further advocates taxes in this country should be replaced by a 2.5 percent flat tax. do you agree?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4107304', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chocolate Jesus</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/comment-page-3/#comment-4107303</link>
		<dc:creator>Chocolate Jesus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 08:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/#comment-4107303</guid>
		<description>&gt;â€œFascistâ€ is a term usually applied to the German NAZI party. 

Several hundred years ago &quot;flat&quot; used to be a term usually applied to the earth. Does that make the earth flat? 

&gt;NAZI was short hand for the â€œNational Socialistâ€

Its something they labeled themselves. So what? Is every country that calls itself a Democratic Republic always a democratic republic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;â€œFascistâ€ is a term usually applied to the German NAZI party. </p>
<p>Several hundred years ago &#8220;flat&#8221; used to be a term usually applied to the earth. Does that make the earth flat? </p>
<p>&gt;NAZI was short hand for the â€œNational Socialistâ€</p>
<p>Its something they labeled themselves. So what? Is every country that calls itself a Democratic Republic always a democratic republic?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4107303', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rastamon</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/comment-page-3/#comment-4106812</link>
		<dc:creator>Rastamon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 00:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/#comment-4106812</guid>
		<description>Jack el al

I am new here but what I have seen here is too much name calling , finger pointing, half truths etc.  I guess I had hoped for more...perhaps my expectations were too high.  I have a few miles on me so I have seen this &quot;dance&quot; before and time and time again.  

The &quot;they do this&quot; and &quot;the others do that&quot; discussion becomes a drone below which real issues lie.  That&#039;s where all these arguments become moot.  That&#039;s why I insist on my congress people hear my voice.  Until such time as both sides start looking forward this can only spiral into a society devoid of dignity or respect and end in a totally failed country.

I don&#039;t believe anyone wants that and since I am closer to the end then the start I have less of a stake in it.  I have done well and can take care of myself and my family so in that regard I am fortunate.  But have we lowered the bar so far, across the board, that there is no hope for generations to come?  The only answer is complete transparency and accountability for all elected officials.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack el al</p>
<p>I am new here but what I have seen here is too much name calling , finger pointing, half truths etc.  I guess I had hoped for more&#8230;perhaps my expectations were too high.  I have a few miles on me so I have seen this &#8220;dance&#8221; before and time and time again.  </p>
<p>The &#8220;they do this&#8221; and &#8220;the others do that&#8221; discussion becomes a drone below which real issues lie.  That&#8217;s where all these arguments become moot.  That&#8217;s why I insist on my congress people hear my voice.  Until such time as both sides start looking forward this can only spiral into a society devoid of dignity or respect and end in a totally failed country.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t believe anyone wants that and since I am closer to the end then the start I have less of a stake in it.  I have done well and can take care of myself and my family so in that regard I am fortunate.  But have we lowered the bar so far, across the board, that there is no hope for generations to come?  The only answer is complete transparency and accountability for all elected officials.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4106812', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ret. Col. Jack Ripper</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/comment-page-3/#comment-4106567</link>
		<dc:creator>Ret. Col. Jack Ripper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 21:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/#comment-4106567</guid>
		<description>Mantastic: &quot;By that standard, Bushâ€™s 31% approval is excellent by comparasion to the democratically controlled congresses 22%.&quot;

Again, this comparison is apples and oranges. How about comparing this president&#039;s ratings to the last one. That would make much more sense so I assume you&#039;ll avoid it at all costs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mantastic: &#8220;By that standard, Bushâ€™s 31% approval is excellent by comparasion to the democratically controlled congresses 22%.&#8221;</p>
<p>Again, this comparison is apples and oranges. How about comparing this president&#8217;s ratings to the last one. That would make much more sense so I assume you&#8217;ll avoid it at all costs.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4106567', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ret. Col. Jack Ripper</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/comment-page-3/#comment-4106559</link>
		<dc:creator>Ret. Col. Jack Ripper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 21:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/#comment-4106559</guid>
		<description>Rastamon, I never even implied that both sides don&#039;t try to use procedural rules to obstruct. I will point out, however, that your position seems to be that there is no difference between Dems attempting to stop the Repubs from appointing mendacious right-wing ideologues to lifetime positions on the Supreme Court and repubs attempting to stop Democrats from doing what is clearly the will of the majority in getting out of Iraq.

On the one hand, Repubs obstruct the will of the majority and on the other, Dems obstruct the will of a small, powerful minority.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rastamon, I never even implied that both sides don&#8217;t try to use procedural rules to obstruct. I will point out, however, that your position seems to be that there is no difference between Dems attempting to stop the Repubs from appointing mendacious right-wing ideologues to lifetime positions on the Supreme Court and repubs attempting to stop Democrats from doing what is clearly the will of the majority in getting out of Iraq.</p>
<p>On the one hand, Repubs obstruct the will of the majority and on the other, Dems obstruct the will of a small, powerful minority.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4106559', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ret. Col. Jack Ripper</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/comment-page-3/#comment-4106543</link>
		<dc:creator>Ret. Col. Jack Ripper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 21:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/#comment-4106543</guid>
		<description>Tampashwhatever: &quot;(The top 50% of wage earners pay 96.03% of income taxes; the top 10% pay 64.89%; the top 1% pay 33.89%).&quot;

Ah, yes, the conservatives&#039; favorite phony argument. Here&#039;s a thought. Take a look at your own paycheck stub (if you draw one.) Is income tax the only tax you pay? There are also the things we call &quot;payroll taxes,&quot; you know, Social Security, etc.

Add the amount working people pay into Social Security and you get completely different numbers. In fact, a huge percentage of working people pay more social security taxes than they do income taxes. And please don&#039;t try to argue that these are not taxes. Ever since the Reagan people doubled the Social Security tax and began using this revenue to pay for government, this has been like any other tax except that only working class people pay it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tampashwhatever: &#8220;(The top 50% of wage earners pay 96.03% of income taxes; the top 10% pay 64.89%; the top 1% pay 33.89%).&#8221;</p>
<p>Ah, yes, the conservatives&#8217; favorite phony argument. Here&#8217;s a thought. Take a look at your own paycheck stub (if you draw one.) Is income tax the only tax you pay? There are also the things we call &#8220;payroll taxes,&#8221; you know, Social Security, etc.</p>
<p>Add the amount working people pay into Social Security and you get completely different numbers. In fact, a huge percentage of working people pay more social security taxes than they do income taxes. And please don&#8217;t try to argue that these are not taxes. Ever since the Reagan people doubled the Social Security tax and began using this revenue to pay for government, this has been like any other tax except that only working class people pay it.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4106543', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: texaslady</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/comment-page-3/#comment-4106537</link>
		<dc:creator>texaslady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 21:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/#comment-4106537</guid>
		<description>Well Rory said good by so Capt Mantastic had to fly in on his cape.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Rory said good by so Capt Mantastic had to fly in on his cape.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4106537', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: loretta</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/comment-page-3/#comment-4106431</link>
		<dc:creator>loretta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 21:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/#comment-4106431</guid>
		<description>Geez--like a mental midget like Bush can be trusted with all that complex math.  He&#039;s done such a screaming job with everything else, why not let him knock the whole damned house down.
You want to allow a retarded person to dismantle the only good thing this country has ever done?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geez&#8211;like a mental midget like Bush can be trusted with all that complex math.  He&#8217;s done such a screaming job with everything else, why not let him knock the whole damned house down.<br />
You want to allow a retarded person to dismantle the only good thing this country has ever done?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4106431', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Neat</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/comment-page-3/#comment-4106371</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Neat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 20:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/#comment-4106371</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;You call the republicans in the congress obstructionist. Okay, what do you call the last 7 years of obstruction of the Bush administration by liberals? Comment by CaptainMantastic â€” October 4, 2007 @ 3:31 pm&lt;/em&gt;

Republicans got everything they wanted, except Harriet Miers and the constitutional persecution of gay people.  Care to list what specifically you are upset about - obstruction wise?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>You call the republicans in the congress obstructionist. Okay, what do you call the last 7 years of obstruction of the Bush administration by liberals? Comment by CaptainMantastic â€” October 4, 2007 @ 3:31 pm</em></p>
<p>Republicans got everything they wanted, except Harriet Miers and the constitutional persecution of gay people.  Care to list what specifically you are upset about &#8211; obstruction wise?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4106371', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: loretta</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/comment-page-3/#comment-4106335</link>
		<dc:creator>loretta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 20:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/#comment-4106335</guid>
		<description>Oh, god, Captain Mantasic is back.
Please, do tell, what obstructionist tactics did poor little Georgie boy suffer, at the hands of the evil Democrats, over the last 7 years?
Details please.  Otherwise you&#039;re just pleasuring yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, god, Captain Mantasic is back.<br />
Please, do tell, what obstructionist tactics did poor little Georgie boy suffer, at the hands of the evil Democrats, over the last 7 years?<br />
Details please.  Otherwise you&#8217;re just pleasuring yourself.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4106335', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nanlichi</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/comment-page-3/#comment-4106284</link>
		<dc:creator>nanlichi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 19:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/#comment-4106284</guid>
		<description>Who are the 30%ers?  They are the Born Again Xians, the ones who believe the earth was created 6k years ago and the Bearded Wonder is going to come down again to scoop them all up to live happily ever after.

They don&#039;t need no stinkin&#039; facts or logic or reality.  They ignore the facts that don&#039;t support their myth and will support their Brother George regardless of the evil he perpetrates.

Thank God and Baby Jesus and Poseidon that they are only 30% of the population.  We need more lions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who are the 30%ers?  They are the Born Again Xians, the ones who believe the earth was created 6k years ago and the Bearded Wonder is going to come down again to scoop them all up to live happily ever after.</p>
<p>They don&#8217;t need no stinkin&#8217; facts or logic or reality.  They ignore the facts that don&#8217;t support their myth and will support their Brother George regardless of the evil he perpetrates.</p>
<p>Thank God and Baby Jesus and Poseidon that they are only 30% of the population.  We need more lions.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4106284', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: missmolly</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/comment-page-3/#comment-4106193</link>
		<dc:creator>missmolly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 19:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/#comment-4106193</guid>
		<description>Comment by Johnny Swank â€” October 4, 2007 @ 2:59 pm

Ah, Johnny -- I was wondering when you&#039;d show up.  Go back to the Tom Tancredo thread.  I answered your accusation about Muslims not condemning terrorism.  I apologize that it took me awhile to get back to my computer, but I had some errands to run and you were gone by the time I posted it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment by Johnny Swank â€” October 4, 2007 @ 2:59 pm</p>
<p>Ah, Johnny &#8212; I was wondering when you&#8217;d show up.  Go back to the Tom Tancredo thread.  I answered your accusation about Muslims not condemning terrorism.  I apologize that it took me awhile to get back to my computer, but I had some errands to run and you were gone by the time I posted it.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4106193', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith1Phx</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/comment-page-3/#comment-4106191</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith1Phx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 19:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/#comment-4106191</guid>
		<description>Note the definition. The word is an Italian derivative and primarily referred to the Mussolini regime rather than the German Nazi Party, but has come to be applied to others over time.

Fascist
Function: noun 
Etymology: Italian fascismo, from fascio bundle, fasces, group, from Latin fascis bundle &amp; fasces fasces 
Date: 1921 
1often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition
2: a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control 

Also, refer to http://www.the-emperor-has-no-clothes.com/Documents/Fascism.html
for the characteristics of a fascist state</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note the definition. The word is an Italian derivative and primarily referred to the Mussolini regime rather than the German Nazi Party, but has come to be applied to others over time.</p>
<p>Fascist<br />
Function: noun<br />
Etymology: Italian fascismo, from fascio bundle, fasces, group, from Latin fascis bundle &amp; fasces fasces<br />
Date: 1921<br />
1often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition<br />
2: a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control </p>
<p>Also, refer to <a href="http://www.the-emperor-has-no-clothes.com/Documents/Fascism.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.the-emperor-has-no-clothes.com/Documents/Fascism.html</a><br />
for the characteristics of a fascist state<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4106191', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theswan</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/comment-page-3/#comment-4106190</link>
		<dc:creator>theswan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 19:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/#comment-4106190</guid>
		<description>It must be just a fact of life that 30% of the electorate haven&#039;t got a clue.  
And I bet the prison population may be more intelligent than that 30% for they poll at 2%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It must be just a fact of life that 30% of the electorate haven&#8217;t got a clue.<br />
And I bet the prison population may be more intelligent than that 30% for they poll at 2%.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4106190', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: missmolly</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/comment-page-3/#comment-4106183</link>
		<dc:creator>missmolly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 19:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/#comment-4106183</guid>
		<description>Why are Liberals so afraid to call themselves Liberals, now hiding behind the word â€œProgressiveâ€ as if tax and spend big-government, Socialism is progress?

Comment by Tampachessdon â€” October 4, 2007 @ 2:25 pm

I realize you are not asking this in any spirit of open-mindedness.  Your post reeks of snarky sarcasm.  But I&#039;ll ignore that and answer your questions as if you asked them seriously.

First, liberals do not hide behind the word &quot;progressive&quot;.  Many liberals are progressives and vice versa.  However, they are not exact synonyms.  I&#039;ll even save you from having to look it up:

libÂ·erÂ·al  (lÄ­b&#039;É™r-É™l, lÄ­b&#039;rÉ™l)  adj.   

a. Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas; free from bigotry. 
b. Favoring proposals for reform, open to new ideas for progress, and tolerant of the ideas and behavior of others; broad-minded. 

proÂ·gresÂ·sive  (prÉ™ËˆgrÉ›sÉªv)  adj.

a. favoring or advocating progress, change, improvement, or reform, as opposed to wishing to maintain things as they are, esp. in political matters: &quot;a progressive mayor&quot;.  
b. making progress toward better conditions; employing or advocating more enlightened or liberal ideas, new or experimental methods, etc.: &quot;a progressive community&quot;.

As you can see, there is some overlap, but the two are not the same.

Now to your point about liberals and progressives being &quot;tax and spend&quot; big-government socialists:

The right-wing has been trying to hang the &quot;tax and spend&quot; label on us for decades.  Yes, we believe in &quot;tax and spend&quot;.  And so do you, unless you advocate the elimination of all taxes.  We recognize that it costs money to run a country (or a state, or a municipality) and that requires some revenue.

However, the conservatives have added another concept -- that of &quot;borrow and spend&quot;.  This policy has dug us into debt measuring trillions of dollars.  Perhaps you would be kind enough to explain why borrowing money to pay our way (and paying interest on the debt -- $408 billion just for 2006) is a better way of financing the government?

The right-wing also likes to try to label us as Socialists (or Marxists), but that doesn&#039;t really fly either.  Just because we advocate ensuring all Americans have access to a few things we consider to be basic rights (education, health care) does not mean we advocate government-controlled distribution of all goods.  And just because we find that profit-taking greedheads have priced health insurance out of reach of the middle class (unless employers provide it for them), doesn&#039;t mean we advocate an elimination of marketplace competition in general.

I hope that helps to answer your question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are Liberals so afraid to call themselves Liberals, now hiding behind the word â€œProgressiveâ€ as if tax and spend big-government, Socialism is progress?</p>
<p>Comment by Tampachessdon â€” October 4, 2007 @ 2:25 pm</p>
<p>I realize you are not asking this in any spirit of open-mindedness.  Your post reeks of snarky sarcasm.  But I&#8217;ll ignore that and answer your questions as if you asked them seriously.</p>
<p>First, liberals do not hide behind the word &#8220;progressive&#8221;.  Many liberals are progressives and vice versa.  However, they are not exact synonyms.  I&#8217;ll even save you from having to look it up:</p>
<p>libÂ·erÂ·al  (lÄ­b&#8217;É™r-É™l, lÄ­b&#8217;rÉ™l)  adj.   </p>
<p>a. Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas; free from bigotry.<br />
b. Favoring proposals for reform, open to new ideas for progress, and tolerant of the ideas and behavior of others; broad-minded. </p>
<p>proÂ·gresÂ·sive  (prÉ™ËˆgrÉ›sÉªv)  adj.</p>
<p>a. favoring or advocating progress, change, improvement, or reform, as opposed to wishing to maintain things as they are, esp. in political matters: &#8220;a progressive mayor&#8221;.<br />
b. making progress toward better conditions; employing or advocating more enlightened or liberal ideas, new or experimental methods, etc.: &#8220;a progressive community&#8221;.</p>
<p>As you can see, there is some overlap, but the two are not the same.</p>
<p>Now to your point about liberals and progressives being &#8220;tax and spend&#8221; big-government socialists:</p>
<p>The right-wing has been trying to hang the &#8220;tax and spend&#8221; label on us for decades.  Yes, we believe in &#8220;tax and spend&#8221;.  And so do you, unless you advocate the elimination of all taxes.  We recognize that it costs money to run a country (or a state, or a municipality) and that requires some revenue.</p>
<p>However, the conservatives have added another concept &#8212; that of &#8220;borrow and spend&#8221;.  This policy has dug us into debt measuring trillions of dollars.  Perhaps you would be kind enough to explain why borrowing money to pay our way (and paying interest on the debt &#8212; $408 billion just for 2006) is a better way of financing the government?</p>
<p>The right-wing also likes to try to label us as Socialists (or Marxists), but that doesn&#8217;t really fly either.  Just because we advocate ensuring all Americans have access to a few things we consider to be basic rights (education, health care) does not mean we advocate government-controlled distribution of all goods.  And just because we find that profit-taking greedheads have priced health insurance out of reach of the middle class (unless employers provide it for them), doesn&#8217;t mean we advocate an elimination of marketplace competition in general.</p>
<p>I hope that helps to answer your question.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4106183', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lefty Patriot</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/comment-page-3/#comment-4106161</link>
		<dc:creator>Lefty Patriot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 18:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/#comment-4106161</guid>
		<description>By that standard, Bushâ€™s 31% approval is excellent by comparasion to the democratically controlled congresses 22%. Donâ€™t want the comparasion - stop perpetuating the value of the poll that you refuse to judge yourself by.

Comment by CaptainMantastic â€” October 4, 2007 @ 2:49 pm

Only if your standards are lying and manipulation, which is certainly the hallmark of the treasonous, lazy, antiAmerican right. Democrats have been denied the leadership rolls by obstructionist fascist republican tools, and by turncoats like the Senator from israel, LIEberman. You do have a nice collection of rightard lies and talking points, though, it&#039;s no wonder you didn&#039;t want them to go to waste. Take them to redstate, where the single-digit IQs will make you feel right at home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By that standard, Bushâ€™s 31% approval is excellent by comparasion to the democratically controlled congresses 22%. Donâ€™t want the comparasion &#8211; stop perpetuating the value of the poll that you refuse to judge yourself by.</p>
<p>Comment by CaptainMantastic â€” October 4, 2007 @ 2:49 pm</p>
<p>Only if your standards are lying and manipulation, which is certainly the hallmark of the treasonous, lazy, antiAmerican right. Democrats have been denied the leadership rolls by obstructionist fascist republican tools, and by turncoats like the Senator from israel, LIEberman. You do have a nice collection of rightard lies and talking points, though, it&#8217;s no wonder you didn&#8217;t want them to go to waste. Take them to redstate, where the single-digit IQs will make you feel right at home.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4106161', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lefty Patriot</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/comment-page-3/#comment-4106154</link>
		<dc:creator>Lefty Patriot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 18:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/#comment-4106154</guid>
		<description>In other words, genious, Fascism was a form of Socialism â€” just the opposite of conservatism.

Comment by Tampachessdon â€” October 4, 2007 @ 2:46 pm

well, it figures that you would happily display your ignorance of political manipulation through messaging, happy Good German that you are. Fascist is not a term usually applied to the NAZI party, by the way, except in your imaginary world. Fascist is a term applied to corporate-run states, as you weaklings and chickenhawks have allowed the US to become.

Thanks for proving my point, though, you were very helpful. Always the dependable, bootlicking tool, you rightards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In other words, genious, Fascism was a form of Socialism â€” just the opposite of conservatism.</p>
<p>Comment by Tampachessdon â€” October 4, 2007 @ 2:46 pm</p>
<p>well, it figures that you would happily display your ignorance of political manipulation through messaging, happy Good German that you are. Fascist is not a term usually applied to the NAZI party, by the way, except in your imaginary world. Fascist is a term applied to corporate-run states, as you weaklings and chickenhawks have allowed the US to become.</p>
<p>Thanks for proving my point, though, you were very helpful. Always the dependable, bootlicking tool, you rightards.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4106154', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lefty Patriot</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/comment-page-3/#comment-4106148</link>
		<dc:creator>Lefty Patriot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 18:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/#comment-4106148</guid>
		<description>You are why I come here. I eat my burger and share my fries, and you are the toy that amuses me. Thank you.

Bush and the Congress seem to not give a damn about any of us. A do nothing stae of affairs we are in.

Comment by Johnny Swank â€” October 4, 2007 @ 2:44 pm

Your ignorance of the makeup of the visitors here is astounding, as is your faux superiority complex. You stuff your fat face with your burget and fries, and die an early death as a tool of the rightwing power sructure that actively hates you and your fellow morons, while we fight to regain what America was throughout its history: a liberal, socialist democracy with a capitalist monetary system. it was a good combination, until the willfully lazy among you let it sink.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are why I come here. I eat my burger and share my fries, and you are the toy that amuses me. Thank you.</p>
<p>Bush and the Congress seem to not give a damn about any of us. A do nothing stae of affairs we are in.</p>
<p>Comment by Johnny Swank â€” October 4, 2007 @ 2:44 pm</p>
<p>Your ignorance of the makeup of the visitors here is astounding, as is your faux superiority complex. You stuff your fat face with your burget and fries, and die an early death as a tool of the rightwing power sructure that actively hates you and your fellow morons, while we fight to regain what America was throughout its history: a liberal, socialist democracy with a capitalist monetary system. it was a good combination, until the willfully lazy among you let it sink.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4106148', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zimzone</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/comment-page-3/#comment-4106147</link>
		<dc:creator>Zimzone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 18:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edit.thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/#comment-4106147</guid>
		<description>Bush and the Congress seem to not give a damn about any of us. A do nothing state of affairs we are in.  -Comment by Johnny Swank

You&#039;re not going to get much of an argument on that one here, JS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bush and the Congress seem to not give a damn about any of us. A do nothing state of affairs we are in.  -Comment by Johnny Swank</p>
<p>You&#8217;re not going to get much of an argument on that one here, JS<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4106147', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
