Think Progress

FBI investigating HUD secretary over Katrina contracts.

In May, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Alphonso Jackson told Congress, “I don’t touch contracts.” But now the FBI and HUD Inspector General Kenneth Donohue are investigating whether Jackson “lined up a contract” for his “golfing buddy”:

The investigation appears to focus, in part, on whether Jackson misled Congress when he testified earlier this year that he had never intervened in awarding HUD contracts. “I don’t touch contracts,” the HUD boss told a Senate panel on May 3.

Investigators are exploring whether Jackson, despite that testimony, had actually lined up a contract at the HUD-controlled Housing Authority of New Orleans, or HANO, for a golfing buddy and social friend from Hilton Head Island, S.C. The friend, William Hairston, was paid more than $485,000 for working at HANO during an 18-month period, according to figures provided by HUD and a former HANO official. The work was not competitively bid.



15 Responses to “FBI investigating HUD secretary over Katrina contracts.”

  1. Frosty Cupcake says:

    Is there no level to which this corrupt administration won’t sink?


  2. Veritas says:

    Boom…boom…boom….another BushButt bites the dust!


  3. Veritas says:

    #1 Absolutely NONE!


  4. Rebel in CA says:

    This is sad. We have been reduced to a level of a Third World country by these bastards.


  5. gummitch says:

    I’m shocked. Shocked! Bush administration officials engaging in such shoddy behavior? It boggles the mind.

    Wait. No, it doesn’t. It’s just exactly what we would expect.


  6. Leftside Annie says:

    I’d be more surprised if he HADN’T lined up a contract for his golfing buddy.


  7. RUCerious says:

    Caughtcha
    Redhanded
    Only
    Now
    You’reGoingtoJail


  8. Menehune says:

    Perhaps this “golf” should be banned. It seems to lead alot of good men into corrupt business practices.


  9. texaslady says:

    Venezuela requires under the table payment to move anything, build anything etc. Saw this first hand in the mid-80s’ working for a Venezuelan company. How is the U.S. any different now ?

    Only contributors to the Republicans get any contracts, do shoddy work paying sub standard scale to illegals, (check it out with a tradesman) they leave the area and the taxpapers will pick up the problems down the road.

    Got to love the Republican motto of fiscal responsibility…guess that means anyone other than a Republican.


  10. Candyce says:

    We are the legendary banana republic, where patronage trumps everything.


  11. Nevar says:

    Perhaps this “golf” should be banned. It seems to lead a lot of good men into corrupt business practices.

    Comment by Menehune — October 4, 2007 @ 5:47 pm

    Not to forget the horrors wrought on the environment and the waste of water.


  12. RUCerious says:

    Don’t get me started on water usage and golf courses.
    In Santa Barbara in the 1970s the six major golf courses got as much water as they needed for pennies on the acre foot, while there was a housing moratorium for new development because of the ‘water shortage’. Rents were astronomical. F*(k golf.


  13. Marie says:

    Isn’t this the way Bush&Co have always operated?
    It makes no difference who has needs, who suffers, who pays, or what the tragedy or the circumstance. It only matters how many of your friends and cronies can benefit.
    They have 15 months more to make all they can – I expect the corruption, graft and greed to prevail to the nth degree until Bush is gone.


  14. barfly says:

    Shades of “Sleepy Sam” Pierce! Another Bushite tries to best a Reagan record.


  15. Bienville says:

    GAO study denounces housing program
    FEMA awarded Miss. lion’s share of money

    Wednesday, October 03, 2007
    By Bill Barrow
    The Times-Picayune

    http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/frontpage/index.ssf?/base/news-9/1191392691129840.xml&coll=1

    BATON ROUGE — A new government accountability report criticizes the way the Federal Emergency Management Agency handled a controversial alternative housing program, bolstering the claims of Louisiana elected officials who say the state was shortchanged.

    A different path, according to the report’s authors, could have steered more than $140 million to three separate housing projects in Louisiana, rather than the $74.5 million directed to one project in the state that still has not broken ground.

    As it is, two projects in Mississippi got $281 million or three-fourths of the grant pool, dwarfing Louisiana’s share for one project. One plan each in Alabama and Texas roughly split the rest.

    That memo included three financing options, one of which would have spread the $388 million to 10 projects in the same four states. … Besides bumping Louisiana’s take past $140 million, that formula would have added a third project in Mississippi and cut the state’s overall award to about $150 million.

    “By selecting and funding the five projects it did, rather than the 10 under this option, FEMA awarded the vast majority of the available funds (about 71 percent) to one project in one state,” the report states.



Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2009 Center for American Progress Action Fund
View Most Popular

Advertisement

What We're About

Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report



imageTopic Cloud


Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
Reports


Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll