Comments on: New right-wing group to have $17 million budget.

By: Chocolate Jesus

Chocolate Jesus — Sat, 06 Oct 2007 14:41:58 +0000

Guys you know why the bible humpers are doing this, right?
They run a hopeless third party presidential candidate to motivate thier people to show up to the polls.. this will dampen (not completely, but partially) their losses in congress.. if the bible humpers stay home en masse, it will be a real massacre for rethugs, they probably wouldnt even be able to retain a filibuster/obsctructionist minority in either chamber..

By: Chocolate Jesus

Chocolate Jesus — Sat, 06 Oct 2007 14:38:58 +0000

>Thatâ€™s belief in the Christian God in case some TP posters are not clear.

the point of difference between this “god ” and muslims “god” is the christian god impregnated more mortals with his holy seed? or is it something else?

wheres Norman Hsu? Hiding under a bed with Jackoff Amramhoff. Care to compare and contrast them? I’m still waiting for that list of specific dollar amounts AbrMhammy gave to democrats, bigfoots promised to get it to me any day now..

>Nah, but he does have a higher popularity rating than your Democrat >Congress..

bigfoot you got any stats on how the republican minority in congress rates?
or is that not IntellEgent enough discussion for you? hahahaha

By: mudsharks buddy

mudsharks buddy — Sat, 06 Oct 2007 04:04:45 +0000

Am I correct ….Does OBL have a more popular rating than Preznit Booosh…..well…will wonders never cease.

By: MapleStreet

MapleStreet — Fri, 05 Oct 2007 21:45:10 +0000

Even though I am a social liberal, there are a couple of conservatives from the Reagan years that I could have some trust in them.

OTOH – Newtie is one of the founding members ??????? Considering how he accelerated the slide to where we are now, how is this anything but a shallow attempt to pretend that the neocons weren’t involved with Shrub. Can I assume Ollie North will march in with Rush Limbaugh at his side ?

By: Chris L

Chris L — Fri, 05 Oct 2007 21:28:27 +0000

Of course, our side doesnâ€™t have the inside track on Chinese communists or Bhudist temples so we are opperating at a slight disadvantage.
Comment by Godfather2 â€” October 5, 2007 @ 5:09 pm
#

Well, there is always hope.

By: Chris L

Chris L — Fri, 05 Oct 2007 21:24:22 +0000

You know, no matter how bad the republicans do this next election, I honestly believe they could have a decent shot at taking it all back in 2012 – if they can keep each other from constantly getting arrested. They just need to keep their noses clean and stay quiet for the next four years and then they will seriously stand a chance.

By: Wayne

Wayne — Fri, 05 Oct 2007 20:47:51 +0000

Theyâ€™ll use some of the money to dig St. Ronnie up and run him.
-Comment by blogenfreude

Put some skates and roll him around, let Nancy actually run things, it will be just like his 2nd term. =P

By: katy

katy — Fri, 05 Oct 2007 20:35:12 +0000

wayne s. @3:55 pm – your comment reminded me of this quote…
thom hartmann plays it frequently:

“Roosevelt is dead. His policies may live but we’re in the process of doing something about that as well” -the limpballs

never ever doubt them when they tell you what they are…
pompous @ss…
.

By: bitblt

bitblt — Fri, 05 Oct 2007 20:32:56 +0000

but, iâ€™ve been hearing lately about another â€œconservativeâ€ group,
comprised of RICHARD VIGORY, TONY PERKINS, JAMES DOBSONâ€¦
who want to run a 3rd party candidate if rudy gets the nodâ€¦

i have an idea:
LETâ€™S LET THE REPUGS DIVIDE THEMSELVES UP THIS TIME.

eh?

OVERWHELMING DEMOCRATIC VOTER TURNOUT.

THEN THEY CANâ€™T STEAL THE ELECTION.

get used to itâ€¦ hehâ€¦
.

Comment by katy â€” October 5, 2007 @ 4:07 pm

Dr. Dobson says the reported splintering of the conservatives is not happening. DrD doesnâ€™t post on TP but he does find a national â€œstageâ€ from which to speak.

His New York Times Op-Ed: ‘The Values Test’ is linked from http://www.family.org. The piece gives a brief summary of what happened in SLC last Saturday.

Some of Dr. Dobsonâ€™s words from NYT:

.
.
.
After two hours of deliberation, we voted on a resolution that can be summarized as follows: If neither of the two major political parties nominates an individual who pledges himself or herself to the sanctity of human life, we will join others in voting for a minor-party candidate. Those agreeing with the proposition were invited to stand. The result was almost unanimous.

The other issue discussed at length concerned the advisability of creating a third party if Democrats and Republicans do indeed abandon the sanctity of human life and other traditional family values. Though there was some support for the proposal, no consensus emerged.

Speaking personally, and not for the organization I represent or the other leaders gathered in Salt Lake City, I firmly believe that the selection of a president should begin with a recommitment to traditional moral values and beliefs. Those include the sanctity of human life, the institution of marriage, and other inviolable pro-family principles. Only after that determination is made can the acceptability of a nominee be assessed.
.
.
.

Well. This campaign is certainly shaping up interestingly.

Before the votes are counted this election will become a test between those who believes in God , and those who donâ€™t.

Thatâ€™s belief in the Christian God in case some TP posters are not clear.

By: lefty

lefty — Fri, 05 Oct 2007 20:29:18 +0000

Only Republicans would start with a shitload of money to combat “corruption”!

LOL. Oh man that’s rich.

By: Buckie Boy

Buckie Boy — Fri, 05 Oct 2007 20:26:10 +0000

Oh, the other Fascist Pigs, I see. Just the other side of the same coin.

Buck Fush

By: Xisithrus

Xisithrus — Fri, 05 Oct 2007 20:17:56 +0000

Why do they think throwing money at the problem will fix anything, the only thing it draws is the same bunch of corrupted souls cloaking themselves in pseudo-morals.

By: rastaman

rastaman — Fri, 05 Oct 2007 20:17:18 +0000

make sure you reserve those names for the list going to the Hague in 2009

By: Zimzone

Zimzone — Fri, 05 Oct 2007 20:15:44 +0000

I remember the ‘trickle down’ effect of Reaganomics.

All I got out of it was pissed on.

By: bamjaya

bamjaya — Fri, 05 Oct 2007 20:14:01 +0000

Hm. The Organization Otherwise Known as Republican Adulterers and Closet Cases…

certainly the kind of bunch that middle America wants to follow into another war!

By: Veritas

Veritas — Fri, 05 Oct 2007 20:11:50 +0000

The GOP recognizes that it will soon have zero power so the senile old men with money are trying for a quick fix. Ain’t going to work boys! sorry.

By: dim wit

dim wit — Fri, 05 Oct 2007 20:11:04 +0000

Maybe they’ll bring voodoo economics back as well.

By: Veritas

Veritas — Fri, 05 Oct 2007 20:11:01 +0000

Let these Fascist Scumbags throw their money down the toilet. Who cares?

By: Leftside Annie

Leftside Annie — Fri, 05 Oct 2007 20:10:48 +0000

Great. It’s the SOF (Senile Old Fart) Party.

YAY!!

By: Leporello

Leporello — Fri, 05 Oct 2007 20:10:11 +0000

Betrayal of conservative principles, like small government and fiscal responsibility? Conservative principles like open and accountable government? Conservative principles like governing with the consent of the governed? People can trot out St. Ronald the Revered, but he was an awful president! Does anyone out there remember the savings and loans debacle that occured on his watch? Does anyone remember how he broke the air traffic controller’s union, and the fact that we the people are still paying for it today? The Republicans bought into the neocon idiocy 6 years ago. They had their drunken fling, now its time to pay the monsterous bill that they rang up so happily.
Impeach Bush and Cheney and Save the Constitution!