Cenk Uyger of “The Young Turks” is on record as a Genocide denier, and is used as a source for Anti-Armenian hate groups

The name of his show is not coincidental and is meant as a deliberate and cruel insult. But he does it as a coward would. If you check out their web page definition and compare with the actual American Heritage Dictionary definition you find that the primary definition referencing the Genocide was eliminated by Mr. Uyger.

Another notable Genocide denier:

The State of Israel.

What a twinkie — he’s nothing but gooey white cream filling.

but the 1 and 1/2 million (probably plus), people, many who will never ever be known to even have ever existed, and who were brutually tortured and
massacred,
well, let’s just forget about. Isn’t that what gave Hitler the idea that nobody would care what happened to the Jews? and one of the reasons for the Holocaust?
Methinks this has something to do with militiary bases, power in the area, access to nearby oil, and American power. An absolute disgrace. What does THE VATICAN have to say about this? I’m waiting…….

Invading and killing a few hundred thousand people in Iraq?
Fear of Turkish reprisal and exposure of certain Congressmen being bribed with drug money?
Keeping Turkey from moving on the Kirkuk oilfields?
General idiocy?

All of the above?

The case for labeling the 1915 massacre a genocide isn’t as clear-cut as it seems. The danger in the US giving the events that label–appropriate as it may be–to the 1915 events is that it will only serve to increase tension between ethnic Turks and Kurds in Turkey when the country is struggling to unify.

Yes, I think it was a genocide. But a lot of harm could come from the US declaring that rather than Turkey doing it eventually. The Economist this week explains it well: http://www.economist.com/world/europe/displaystory.cfm?story_id=9910136

But I also wonder, getting away from the Armenian resolution and focusing on the situation with the Kurds *TODAY* : Considering the rhetoric Shrub gave for our actions after 9/11 to pre-emptively strike at terror, wouldn’t Turkey have a better argument for attacking *TODAY* the Kurds than we have in attacking say Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan ?

Turkey and the Kurds have long held an “interesting” relationship. Kurds exist in the border regions and just across the border where they could easily pass into Turkey. (although similar to there being no homosexuals in Iran, some may insist that the Turkish Kurds are actually something else).

So if there is as much as a cap gun fired by a Kurd within the nation of Turkey, using Shrubs so-called “logic”, Turkey would have full justification of military invasion of the Kurds (and, of course, taking their oil reserves).

Bush: “Yeah, it’s a tragedy. There. I recognized it.”

Libs have no shame, happy to help any enemy, and alienate any ally during a war. You are treasonous, traitorous cowards.

I need only to point at you know who.

Comment by MCMetal

No, Imperical beliefs are.

BBC Article

Ha! They edited their article! LMAO. It used to say something like, “the facts are still disputed,” or the evidence isn’t substantial.

I’d tell those BBC bureacrons to go read A Problem From Hell.

Read it. Love it.

Actually, you just agreed with what I said, and I do not say that to argue, but to show that most people think history repeats thru some mystical unknown cause.

Comment by Xisithrus — October 10, 2007 @ 5:28 pm

Stupidity is a mystical unknown cause ?

Actually, you just agreed with what I said, and I do not say that to argue, but to show that most people think history repeats thru some mystical unknown cause.

Comment by MCMetal

Has it occured to you that intentionally repetitive history works to preserve past ideologies for a purpose?

Just asking.

Comment by Xisithrus — October 10, 2007 @ 5:21 pm

No
I believe past history that is terrible/horrible , repeats itself because it’s enacted by selfish , shitty people once again……..