Comments on: Ezra Klein challenges Malkin to an SCHIP debate.

By: upright left

upright left — Fri, 12 Oct 2007 04:37:21 +0000

“trollop, succubus, mud-wrestling match between Malkin and Coulter, she is go FUGLY, SKANKS, She looks like a cheap vinyl blowup doll in that picture, an appropriate image considering the roll she plays for the GOP!,”

Hmm, I thought I remembered reading that libs here address the issues while conservatives use personal attacks. And libs are the ones who oppose gender specific attacks against women that would never be used to attack a male. Guess that was a mistake. ;)

By: deebaser

deebaser — Thu, 11 Oct 2007 18:41:35 +0000

I just read her “Im too much of a coward to debate anything of substance, so Im going to snipe at Klein from the safety of my own blog” rant.

She has cemented her position as the guest you call when Ann Coulter isn’t throwing feces on orphans to promote a book.

By: JoshDest

JoshDest — Thu, 11 Oct 2007 17:37:20 +0000

Apparently, she says it’s a waste of time, and would essentially be lowering herself to take part in a debate.

Translation: I’m too scared.

By: hterrya

hterrya — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 19:50:36 +0000

Q – Will Malkin accept or will she run and hide?

A – Last time she was seen, she was hiding out in the bushes in Maryland! {:-)

By: kuvasz

kuvasz — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 19:41:17 +0000

Her silence speaks volumes.

now shall we refer to that woman as “the mentally challenged” ms malkin?

By: FunMe

FunMe — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:41:29 +0000

SKANKS like MiliCON always “cut and run”!

By: cage free brown

cage free brown — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:10:58 +0000

well, EZRA… if EZRA really is your name!!!!
you won’t be so cocky when you find Freepers going through your garbage, will you?

as for ‘Stuart Saves His Family’, anybody who’s ever been in ‘the program’ or knows anybody in ‘the program’ will agree that it is a timeless classic!

By: bluestatedon

bluestatedon — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:49:59 +0000

” The question is: HOW will Malkin decline?”

She’ll cite her personal physician’s fears that her eyeballs will finally detach themselves from their sockets if she gets too agitated by facts.

By: toasterhead

toasterhead — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:30:15 +0000

Really, how would one ever call Al Franken a political terrorist?

Comment by bilbobaggins â€” October 10, 2007 @ 1:07 pm

Obviously you haven’t seen Stuart Saves His Family.

By: slappy magoo

slappy magoo — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:15:07 +0000

The question really isn’t “Will Malkin debate Ezra?” I think we all know that’s a “no.” The question (and maybe we should take wagers on this) is: HOW will Malkin decline? Will she ignore the request? Will she say she’s not going to accept a debate where someone else sets the rules (ala “no hotair TV”)? Will she pretend to take the “high road,” and claim this issue is no longer worth talking about and why won’t the libs just let it go since they know they’re wrong? Or will she take it to the same sort of screechy harpy extremes she normally takes when she finds something offensive – post Ezra’s address online, point out where his family lives, and let the Freepers loose to do their damage?

By: bilbobaggins

bilbobaggins — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:08:00 +0000

Troll Patrol is very active this morning, Iâ€™m guessing Rory/Jake is freaking out about nowâ€¦ LOL
Comment by Nevar

Why don’t they just kill the account. I thought that was the purpose of a registration system. If someone abuses their privileges, you revoke their registration.

By: bilbobaggins

bilbobaggins — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:07:01 +0000

Rhetorical question, Iâ€™m sure. Folks like Malkin, Limbaugh, Coulter (and sadly, Franken) are political terrorists.
Franken? Surely you jest,sirâ€¦
Comment by whiteyfresh

Really, how would one ever call Al Franken a political terrorist?

By: Yamara

Yamara — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:54:28 +0000

Actually, I was referring to the pic on the Think Progress article, not GoTFreedumb’s.

She’s hasing plenty of cheezdog on that other one.

By: RUCerious

RUCerious — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:53:28 +0000

Thanks admins…

By: RUCerious

RUCerious — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:53:02 +0000

Hey, GOT, that’s not nice.

By: Yamara

Yamara — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:52:41 +0000

I love that shot of Malkin.

“I can’t has cheezburger!?”

By: RUCerious

RUCerious — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:50:12 +0000

Malkin shows her heartless soulless nature every time she opens her mouth and utters anything.

Why can’t conservatives remember that, BUT FOR THE GRACE of their deity, there they would be???

By: MarkD

MarkD — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:16:38 +0000

Shorter Rory/Malkin: They had a house they could have sold to pay those six-figure medical bills!

Response: Um … then where would they live?

Rory/Malkin: WHO CARES?! We can’t give health insurance to people who can’t afford it because … well, because!

Response: But we spend billions in Iraq every week.

Rory/Malkin: As we should!! Invading countries is much, much more important than giving health care to our own people! After all, health care is a privilege for those who can afford it!!!

Response: *Stunned silence at the stupidity and soulessness*

Rory/Malkin: WE WON THE DEBATE! WOO HOO!!!

Okay … so I paraphrased a bit. But you get the point.

By: OxyCon

OxyCon — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:14:08 +0000

Malkin is emboldened to act like a right wing thug by her connections to Fox News and because of the traffic America’s 25%ER mouthbreathers send to her hate speech website. She’s a bully, a thug, a stormtooper and a coward. She’ll never engage an opponant on equal ground.

By: Dumb_Fox

Dumb_Fox — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:06:31 +0000

Malkin:

“The refusal to do assets tests on federal health insurance programs is why federal entitlements are exploding and government keeps expanding.”

Perhaps this sounds intelligent to the terminally stupid, but it is wrong, both factually and logically.