Of course you do , you are a stupid democrat. Many years from now when it finally sinks in , remember who told you so.

And lefty crybaby you maggot scum, George W Bush “IS” the President of the United States. Now go change your diaper little punk ass.

All comments by Bartlebee show the desperation of a party of criminal frauds. You are such a joke , the exact opposite is true. The fact is that democrats are the ones who are guilty of what you accused Republicans of.

Say hello to the criminal democrat party of perpetual fraud. It’s because of infantile tantrum throwing losers like you that I no longer vote democrat. Thanks a million stupid bed wetter.

I am glad to see the party of traitors and frauds have been reduced to a bunch of sniveling lying nitwits. It’s time to rid this Country of Un-American democrat trash.

You don’t accept that that the words “accounting” and “accoutability” have two totally different meanings even though I’ve plainly displayed the dictionary defintion for each. So what?

>http://www.junkscience.com/

Hahahahaha. Ah muckdogs favorite site. The guy repsonsible for this site has made a few other “interesting” assertions:

Cigarette smoke isnt bad for you.

If the world trade center had more asbestos in it, it wouldnt have collapsed.

Excuse us if we dont want to get our scientific evidence from people who get paid thousands of dollars an hour in consulting fees from the oil industry..

yes, bighole, and some folks think that Bush is president. No accounting for the vast, deep stupidity of the right. thanks for pointing out how stupid you are, though. I might have forgotten.

Comment by Vinnie — October 13, 2007 @ 12:27 pm

Bigfoot is a coward and a liar, so everything he says is suspect. I wager that his little “green” story is an outright lie as well.

To boil down this argument to its simpliest terms – Some scientists predicted in the 1970’s that man’s activities would lead to a global cooling effect. Thus, anyone suggesting today that man’s activities will lead to a warming effect must be wrong. Sorry, that just doesn’t pass the most basic logic test.

Secondly, I have no problem with Exxon supporting their business, which is oil. …

So, in short, my answer is: “Yes.”

Comment by O. Bigfoot — October 13, 2007 @ 11:56 am

If there’s no consensus, let’s hear the scientific organizations that support your side. I provided numerous ESTABLISHED SCIENTIFIC ORGANIZATIONS that take my side. You provided a link to articles written by two INDIVIDUALS.

You have the right to your own opinion. You can even doubt evolution if you want. You should just be open enough to admit that you are going against established scientific consensus. IMHO, it’s pretty arrogant to suggest that you’re right but the scientific community, the broad group of experts in the matter, are wrong. That’s exactly what you are implying.

Exxon is clearly more concerned with their short-term profits than with the future of the planet we inhabit. You don’t have a problem with that. I do.

I believe in a free flow of information where research is done for the sole purpose of getting the right answer – the true intent of the scientific method. You think that it’s ok that those with the most money can submit “research” that distorts the real situation. That is not science. It is propoganda!

BTW, your “rest of the country” comment implies that we are in the minority. There have been many polls that show a majority of people in this country think our government is not doing enough to combat global warming. In fact, YOU are in the minority on this. Al Gore is responsible for educating a lot of people on this and for that I thank him.

As to be expected, we hear the line about the huge danger in trying to solve this problem. What possible damage could there be in doing simple things like driving more fuel-efficient vehicles and investing more money in alternative energy sources?

Again as to be expected, this global warming denier slips into the “out of my control” line of thinking which implies that we are powerless to do anything about it anyway. He goes on about his personal life style which is not at all the issue here. The issue is what kinds of decisions are made by our government at the much larger level. Indeed, there are many, many things that the Bush administration could have done to help ameliorate this problem. They have been completely negligent in this regard which is why Al Gore, and none of the Republicans that served under Bush won the Nobel peace prize.

http://www.junkscience.com/sep98/scilet.html

Bigfoot, do you think it’s ok to take money from companies like Exxon and write pieces that appear to be scientific and counter prevailing scientific consensus on global warming?

Now, where are the scientific organizations that support your opinion on global warming? BTW, here is a list of the organizations that I was able to find that support the consensus view.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)

Joint science academies’ statement 2005

American Meteorological Society

American Geophysical Union

American Institute of Physics

The American Astronomical Society

American Association for the Advancement of Science

Stratigraphy Commission of the Geological Society of London

Geological Society of America

American Association of State Climatologists

Australian Medical Association

American Chemical Society

American Quaternary Association

Engineers Australia (The Institution of Engineers Australia)

Still waiting for yours

Comment by O. Bigfoot — October 13, 2007 @ 10:21 am

How about a four year long war that costs hundreds of billions of dollars, that has killed four thousand Americans and, at least, tens of thousands of Iraqis all fought over a rationale that turned out to be incorrect. I think any lover of ‘peace’ would find all of this a little disturbing.

And of course, this is the typical right-wing tactic of turning the argument around. YOU are the one who is so angry that they feel compelled to come to a web site where they are obviously going to start and argument.

Comment by O. Bigfoot — October 13, 2007 @ 9:04 am

Since Fox is ‘balanced’ can you tell us the person on this segment who provided the point of view that Gore is a great man that deserved this award? Hmmm. Maybe their wasn’t one. Maybe Fox CONSISTENTLY provides a forum for extreme righties like Ann Coulter and Michelle Malkin without providing a balance. (Michael’s favorite Steven Milloy is also a Fox News regular.)

Here’s a game I like to play with the global warming denier trolls. It’s called “Quote the Scientific Organization”. We go back and forth providing quotes from scientific organizations that have taken a position on global warming. The organizations have to be valid scientific organizations not places like Junk Science that have been clearly shown to take money from corportations (like big tobacco) and issue reports that are clearly in their favor.

I’ll start with one from the predominant meteorological organization in this country, the American Meteorological Society.

“Despite uncertainties, there is adequate evidence from observations and interpretations of climate simulations to conclude that the atmosphere, ocean, and land surface are warming; that humans have significantly contributed to this change; and that further climate change will continue to have important impacts on human societies, on economies, on ecosystems and on wildlife through the 21st century snd beyond, according to a new information statement on climate change issued by the American Meteorological Society today. The AMS is the nation’s leading professional society for those involved in the atmospheric and related sciences.”

Reference: http://www.ametsoc.org/amsnews/2007climatechangerelease.pdf

OK Bigfoot, your turn. Isn’t this a great way to debate the topic? Let’s let only the established scientific organizations give their point of view.

When I talk about this in public there is always a 20% squirming like they just ’sharted’ their pants, it happened again last night.