White House ‘happy’ over Gore win.
By on Oct 12th, 2007 at 9:30 am
White House ‘happy’ over Gore win.
Reacting to the Nobel Peace Prize announcement, White House spokesman Tony Fratto said: “Of course we’re happy for Vice President Gore and the IPCC for receiving this recognition.”
View Most Popular
Advertisement
What We're About
What We're Fighting For
What We're Fighting Against
Featured
Subscribe to the Progress Report
Topic CloudView topics sorted by popularity
Afghanistan
Bachmann
Beck
Boehner
Business
Cheney
Civil Rights
Congress
Corporate Ethics
Dobbs
Economy
Education
Election
Energy
Environment
Ethics
Fox News
Gingrich
Glenn Beck
Global Warming
Health Care
Immigration
International Relations
Justice
LGBT
Lieberman
Limbaugh
Media
Military
O'Reilly
Obama
Palin
Pelosi
Politics
Race
Radical Right
Religion
Sports
Steele
Stimulus
Tea Parties
Tea Party
Terrorism
Veterans
Women's Rights
Visit Our Affiliated Sites
Reports
In-depth studies on select topics
Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.
ArchivesBlog Roll
White House spokesman Tony Fratto said: Of course we’re happy
Reporters noted his head burst into flames as he left the podium…
October 12th, 2007 at 9:34 amGDumbya was informed about Gore’s prize this morning when he awoke. He is reported to have said: “Gore won a ‘noble piece’ of what?”
October 12th, 2007 at 9:37 amI’ll bet they are. This must be very frustrating for them. Everything they do these days turns to shit. Now the Democrat they hate the most is basking in the limelight. My bet is steam is coming out of both Bush and Chaney’s ears.
October 12th, 2007 at 9:37 amSo let’s see…President Gore has now won an Academy Award, the Nobel Peace Prize, and the 2000 election. And yet the reichwingers STILL want to deny that global climate change is a problem recognized around the world (except in their own little sandboxes, of course).
Fragging of Gore and the Nobel Committee by the trolls to begin in 3….2….1…
October 12th, 2007 at 9:41 amthey delayed any actions 8 years and let big oil earn billions in extra cash over that time.
October 12th, 2007 at 9:42 amIn other news Dick Cheney was given the Boris Karloff Award for being the creepiest man on the plant and Laura Bush was given a blue ribbon by the Buffalo Woman’s Cotillion for her book Pickles and The Decider Meet Pootie.
-GSD
October 12th, 2007 at 9:44 ambush is pissed he didnt win the peace prize….. ATTACK!
October 12th, 2007 at 9:48 am“Of course we’re happy for Vice President Gore”
=
“We can see how receiving an award like that would make the goofy treehugger a happy man, and it’s nice and all, if you’re into peace and stuff.”
October 12th, 2007 at 9:48 amOf course they say they are happy for Gore. Now let’s watch their minions trash Gore, the award, and global warming.
October 12th, 2007 at 9:48 amThere is already an on-line poll = Does Gore deserve the Nobel?
After targeting a kid last week, now they will have a new target; their meanness and malice is a pathetic sight.
Suck it, trolls.
October 12th, 2007 at 9:57 amI was trying to find out if there is a tradition of the White House hosting the US citizens that win the Nobel Prize. That would be an interesting dinner…
October 12th, 2007 at 9:59 amWhat else can they say? It’s pretty tough to spin this one negatively – it’s a lose/lose proposition and Bush is backed into a corner. Gotta love it!
Here’s the link to the work of David Hawkins, M.D. on spiritual calibration:
October 12th, 2007 at 9:59 amhttp://www.miraclescenter.us/Hawkins.htm
this one focuses on the spiritual aspect of “non duality” –
October 12th, 2007 at 10:00 amhttp://www.translucents.org/hawkins.htm
and one more…..http://www.veritaspub.com/
later TP buddies!
October 12th, 2007 at 10:01 amSeven years ago BushCo & their operatives, including those on the Supreme Court, made Al Gore a “loser.†Since then which of the two has brought honor to America. And who has brought the opposite…
And further, an American wins the Nobel Peace Prize. So when do we hear that “proud of American accomplishments” congratulatory phone call from the WH on CNN?
October 12th, 2007 at 10:05 amNot much of an endorsement.
Typical
Party before Country
October 12th, 2007 at 10:10 amI don’t have a problem with Al Gore winning the award…it really doesn’t matter to me, the award is rather irrelevant these days….who won last year, without looking it up on the internet?
Comment by O. Bigfoot — October 12, 2007 @ 10:02 am
HA HA HA! Typical spin from the Repugs. Still in denial about GW when the rest of the world and 99% of legitimate scientists agree.
About the same view as “WMDs” and “In the last throes of insurgency”. If this attitude wasn’t causing death and endangering our children’s future, it would be funny …. now, it is just pathetic.
When the Big Flush comes in ‘09, the swirling action will begin to clean the shitstreaks off this country and the Constitution.
October 12th, 2007 at 10:10 amProducing a failed movie that is being proven more and more alarmist evey day, thus putting in jeopardy the very theory of which he is trying to convince the world is going to cause imminent disaster? As more and more points in the movie are proven to be scientifically innacurate, it throw doubt upon the whole global warming problem.
A failed movie that won an Academy Award? Interesting twisted logic. And the fact that a few predictions made in the movie are disputed by some climate scientists does not “throw doubt upon the whole global warming problem.” More interesting twisted logic.
Interesting that Gore shares the award with the U.N., even though they do not even agree on the possible ramifications, nor the causes, of global warming. Regardless of claims to the contrary, there is no “consensus†on global warming.
He doesn’t share it with the UN, he shares it with the IPCC. And there is in fact a consensus on global climate change. Just because climate scientists are in disagreement about some details does not mean that they don’t agree on the big picture. That’s what science IS – a constant effort to test and re-test theories in order to improve understanding on a topic.
I don’t have a problem with Al Gore winning the award…it really doesn’t matter to me, the award is rather irrelevant these days….who won last year, without looking it up on the internet?
Mohammed Yunus, and I didn’t have to look it up on the Internet. I’m a big fan of the Grameen Bank, thank you very much.
October 12th, 2007 at 10:12 amHappy news to wake up to this morning. :)
October 12th, 2007 at 10:13 amPoor Bigfoot, I am sure George W. will win the Pat Robertson Most Likely to Bring on The Apocalypse Award.
Suck it up.
-GSD
P.S. Bigfoot, did you see that Russia’s Putin attacked Condi Rice and Gates so severely that they were “visibly taken aback”?
Condi should get the Michael Brown Do Nothing Award.
October 12th, 2007 at 10:14 am>Just to put it all in context, here’s a few previous Nobel Prize nominees:
Anybody can be nominated by anyone for the prize you neanderthallic nazi. Add bush to that list. So what? Heck, a few loons have even won, but that doesnt invalidate the entire thing by any means.
More and more alarmist?
Cite some evidence for the crap you spew. Even fox news is admitting global warming exists these days, their just saying its a good thing so we can get to more oil.
Still waiting for that list of amounts Abramhoff gave to specific democrats. Do you have anything intellEgent to say Bigfwat?
hhahah.
Have you figured out the difference between “accoutant” and “accountability” yet?
Speaking of alarmist, do you have any idea how much more likely your life is to be ended by one of your fellow americans than it is by a foriegner bigfwat? Its hundreds of thousands of times more likely to be an american that ends it, you ignorant whitetrash inbred hick.
October 12th, 2007 at 10:14 amFragging of Gore and the Nobel Committee by the trolls to begin in 3….2….1…
Comment by The Dogfather — October 12, 2007 @ 9:41 am
CNN has already made some negative comments regarding it, noting the British High Court has found some problems with showing The Inconvienent Truth to British school children. I don’t watch or listen to Fox “News” but I’d imagine they’re just bashing the award outright.
October 12th, 2007 at 10:14 amShorter O Bigass: Waaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!
October 12th, 2007 at 10:15 amYeah, the 28 percenters are all over the net, continue to spew their tired lies about Gore.
Sucks to be them.
October 12th, 2007 at 10:17 amBigfoot, thank your mighty stars that TP moderators arent pricks like redstate, etc, or you wouldnt even be able to post here, and you’d have to spend more time reflecting on your tedious life watching the paint peel and eating peach cobbler.
You think this is some sort of bizarre testiment to your resilience but ironically you dont see that the very people you criticize are more willing to let dissenters speak than the people you claim are “the good guys”.
October 12th, 2007 at 10:18 amWhat a joke you, and everythign you believe, are..
#11 wrote: “I was trying to find out if there is a tradition of the White House hosting the US citizens that win the Nobel Prize. That would be an interesting dinner…
Comment by Dr Benway — October 12, 2007 @ 9:59 am
Even if there was a tradition, they’ll (the WH) will back out because Al Gore is a co-winner, not the sole winner.
On the other hand, I’d like to see the WH extend an invite which Al Gore would decline…
October 12th, 2007 at 10:21 amGSD at #6
October 12th, 2007 at 10:22 amThanks ! Your quick wit is responsible for my morning chuckle today.
Yeah, and they’ll sell little maps at O Bigfats cemetary so his grandkids can make sure they’re pissing on the right grave.
October 12th, 2007 at 10:23 amIn celebration of Vice President Gore’s winning of the Nobel Peace prize, President Bush announced his list for Presidential Medals of Freedumb:
Rush Limbaugh
Anne Coulture
Bill O’Reilly
Michelle Malkin
Himself
VP Cheney
Alberto Gonzales
Larry Craig
Mr. P
Big Ole Footinmouth
Jake (the Snake as Bush calls him)
During his announcement Bush had a message for the younger generation:
October 12th, 2007 at 10:24 am“you see if you childrens learn real hard, one day in the future after I enact the National Security Presidential Directives and become your lifelong Dictator, maybe then yous too can get one of these here medals…they’re REALLY shiny!
Comment by Chocolate Jesus — October 12, 2007 @ 10:18 am
Gotta wonder how obiggie and the rest of the Reality Denial gang make it through the day without total meltdowns. To continue to blindly drink the BushCo Kool-aid must be like a dog who constantly licks his own ass for nutrients.
October 12th, 2007 at 10:24 amOBigfoot is a case of ‘open anus/insert head’ – living in the dark ages still.
October 12th, 2007 at 10:25 amGore Envy is rampant today – especially with the 28 percenter Under Achievers! Gotta love it!
October 12th, 2007 at 10:26 amJust to put it all in context, here’s a few previous Nobel Prize nominees:
Josef Stalin
Benito Mussalini
Adolph Hitler
Comment by O. Bigfoot — October 12, 2007 @ 10:02 am
————————————–
Just to put YOUR comment into even better context — remember that anybody can be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize, and hundreds are nominated every year, including many who don’t have a snowball’s chance in hell of making it (such as those on your list). Getting nominated is meaningless. The Nobel committee attaches no special honor to being nominated. It’s not like getting nominated for an Academy Award.
As far as your challenge about knowing who won last year, I admit I don’t know that and I would have to look it up. But I do know (without looking it up) that the last American who won the Peace Prize was Jimmy Carter, who won about 5 years ago (I think — I may be wrong on the year).
Being a Nobel Laureate is a bigger deal than you claim, because there are enough of us who respect the Nobel organization. They have managed to operate outside of politics and focus on those who truly promote the cause of peace and betterment of the world. Your entire post smacks of sour grapes.
October 12th, 2007 at 10:29 amEven if there was a tradition, they’ll (the WH) will back out because Al Gore is a co-winner, not the sole winner.
On the other hand, I’d like to see the WH extend an invite which Al Gore would decline…
Comment by Theresa — October 12, 2007 @ 10:21 am
No no no – the White House recognizes global climate change now, and is indeed doing something about it. Based on their previous work in this area, I believe they would extend an invitation.
To an international panel of leaders who would convene and decide on a target date for setting up a meeting at which they’d decide whether or not to invite Al Gore to the White House. THEN they’d convene a second series of meetings at which the leaders would all check their schedules and decide on a mutually-acceptable date to hold another meeting at which they’d come up with a date for Al Gore’s visit to the White House.
A third series of meetings would determine when to convene the committee to pick out the invitation stationary and decide on the font size and color for the invitation. But that would only be after a series of private meetings with representatives of the major paper-manufacturing and font-making companies and the limited-bid selection of a contractor to draft the text of the invitation.
Finally, a fourth series of meetings would set a target date for mailing the invitation and negotiate the terms of the stamp purchase, which would occur during the fifth series of meetings.
All told, I think we’ll see Al Gore meeting with the President some time in 2038.
October 12th, 2007 at 10:32 amRegardless of claims to the contrary, there is no “consensus†on global warming.
Well, there wasn’t a consensus on how many troops we needed to send to Iraq in 2003, there wasn’t a consensus on the long-term effects of our occupation of said country, there was no plan in place for what to do after “Mission Accomplished,” and there wasn’t a consensus on the validity of the intelligence that got us there in the first place.
Yet Bush insists on touting the “war” in the quagmire called Iraq as his, and America’s, greatest foreign policy achievement.
Never mind that the place is a hell hole, the number of terrorists worldwide has risen, and Mrs. Dick Cheney announces that terrorist attacks on Britain and Spain are meaningless to America because they are not in our greater interest.
October 12th, 2007 at 10:32 am#15 – “Just to put it all in context, here’s a few previous Nobel Prize nominees: Josef Stalin, Benito Mussalini, Adolph Hitler” Comment by O. Bigfoot — October 12, 2007 @ 10:02 am
Your forgot one more on your list!
George W. Bush
October 12th, 2007 at 10:34 amanyone want to know what bigfoot looks like?
i found a pic: http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/n/U/moran.jpg
October 12th, 2007 at 10:34 amFragging of Gore and the Nobel Committee by the trolls to begin in 3….2….1…
Comment by The Dogfather — October 12, 2007 @ 9:41 am
oh my gosh, that is exactly what i was about to post!!!
October 12th, 2007 at 10:35 amComment by toasterhead — October 12, 2007 @ 10:32 am
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA — LOVED your post!
Seriously, though — the White House DOES recognize global warming now. They enthusiastically support it, because the melting of the arctic ice cap means it’s now easier to get the oil underneath it.
October 12th, 2007 at 10:35 am#35, toasterdhead: Silly me. I completely forgot about the invite protocol.
October 12th, 2007 at 10:36 amYour forgot one more on your list!
George W. Bush
Comment by Democrat Soldier — October 12, 2007 @ 10:34 am
You are correct, sir!
BBC News, via Google:
UK Prime Minister Tony Blair and US President George W Bush have been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize by a Norwegian politician.
Harald Tom Nesvik, a member of the right-wing Party for Progress, said that he had nominated the two world leaders for fighting terrorism and promoting world peace.
October 12th, 2007 at 10:38 amtheyr all part of the same club. Guiliani and Hillary are both on the CFR committee. Theyr all in on it together, Please take the wool from over your eyes
October 12th, 2007 at 10:38 amCongrats to Al Gore!
Now we need to draft him for President.
October 12th, 2007 at 10:39 amCome on, Bigfoot. Please put Bush’s nomination into context by comparing it with Hitler’s and Stalin’s.
October 12th, 2007 at 10:39 amThat nomination was in 2002, BTW.
October 12th, 2007 at 10:40 amBigfoot/LittleP*nis does the usual right wing bait and switch. He did the lame “anyone can be nominated” line instead of the “Who actually wins” line.
When you do the “who won” list it is not Hitler, Staling and Bush, it is:
*The Dalai Lama
*Nelson Mandela(The most righwingers I knew called Mandela a “terrorist” throughout the 80’s)
*Elie Wiesel
*Lech Walesa(The last union guy the rightwing fell in love with)
*Mother Theresa
*Anwar Sadat/Menachem Begin
*Martin Luther King
A little honesty always punctures the flaccid rightwing talking points.
-GSD
October 12th, 2007 at 10:43 amWhat an idiot that Norwegian must be. Nominating a person who “promotes” world peace yet invades a country that was of no threat to the U.S. and carries on a “war” for 4.5 years with no end in sight and doesn’t give a damn about capturing the alleged mastermind of the 9/11 attacks (I say alleged because the FBI itself does not attempt to link B.L. with the attacks).
October 12th, 2007 at 10:45 amJust to put things into perspective, Bigfoot was nominated to be employee of the month at his local Dairy Queen Fast Food and Dessert Joint, and he lost to the “Soecial needs” fella who’s only in charge of keeping the heat lamps on the french fries from burning out. Bigfoot’s mom tried to console him by reminding him that it’s just a popularity contest. Reminding him that he is therefore unpopular, Bigfoot spend the remainder of that weekend in an Absolut-n-NyQuil stupor.
October 12th, 2007 at 10:45 amA little honesty always punctures the flaccid rightwing talking points.
-GSD
Comment by GSD — October 12, 2007 @ 10:43 am
Facts: The Prince Albert of the Right
October 12th, 2007 at 10:49 amOh, and Bigfoot, the New York Sun wanted Patraeus to be nominated, too.
While you are thinking of how to put Bush’s nomination into context with Stalin and Hitler, add Patraeus to your explanation, too.
October 12th, 2007 at 10:51 amBigfoot is known as Bigfoot because of his toe-tapping abilities. He is always a “big” hit at the local GOPervert restrooms during election season.
-GSD
October 12th, 2007 at 10:54 amWhy is Rudy Giuliani such a bad judge of character?
Bernard Kerik’s legal nightmare is about to get worse, with federal prosecutors expected to file charges against the former police commissioner that will likely include allegations of bribery, tax fraud and obstruction of justice, the Daily News has learned.
Rudy’s friend, and confidante is corrupt to the core.
-GSD
October 12th, 2007 at 10:56 amI heard O Biggie studied under (literally) the famous Tappy McWideStance.
October 12th, 2007 at 10:57 amMeanwhile, latest data show that the polar ice cap is melting faster than even the most dire predictions. It’s nice that Bigfoot has to suck on Gore’s prize, but it may be a detail if we’re all under water or dunes in 25 years.
October 12th, 2007 at 10:58 amI thought General Petraeus was supposed the win this award for all the peace and prosperity he brought to Baghdad.
October 12th, 2007 at 11:01 amJosef Stalin
Benito Mussalini
Adolph Hitler
Comment by O. Bigfoot — October 12, 2007 @ 10:02 am
Those were your nominees, I suspect, bigyap. Great spelling, as usual. You’re still an ignorant chickenhawk.
October 12th, 2007 at 11:02 am#47
http://pubs.acs.org/subscribe/journals/esthag-w/2007/aug/science/ee_seaice.html
Yes.
October 12th, 2007 at 11:04 amNobel is sweet revenge for Gore, blow to Bush
[...]
It may also be interpreted as a part of an international backlash not only against seven years of what many see as environmental backsliding under Bush but also against his Iraq war policy and perceived arrogance in world affairs.
“The Nobel Committee’s recognition of Vice President Gore shines a bright light on the most inconvenient truth of all — the selection of George Bush as president has endangered the peace and prosperity of the entire planet,” said fellow Democrat John Edwards, a 2008 White House contender.
It was a double slap to the Republican president, marking the second prize to a leading Democratic critic during Bush’s administration.
The 2002 prize went to former President Jimmy Carter, which the Nobel committee head at the time said was a signal of disapproval over Bush’s preparations for the invasion of Iraq.
October 12th, 2007 at 11:09 am[...]
http://www.reuters.com/article/reutersEdge/idUSN1220734420071012
…
That’s IF happiness is eating sour grapes.
∞
October 12th, 2007 at 11:19 amwho won last year, without looking it up on the internet?
Comment by O. Bigfoot
Mohammad Yunus.
October 12th, 2007 at 11:36 amMy, the vitriol from you lefties! So much for being the people of toleration, eh?
Comment by O. Bigfoot — October 12, 2007 @ 11:41 am
We are the people of toleration. It’s the only reason we haven’t exterminated you morons on the right.
October 12th, 2007 at 11:46 am>My, the vitriol from you lefties! So much for being the people of toleration, >eh?
have an answer any of my questions? you come on here with your educated, arrogant banter and your imaginary illusions of intellect and what do you expect?
>And as for “accountant†and “accountabilityâ€
>…I believe I used the term: “accountingâ€
nope… your a liar or an idiot, or both. your quote was “we shouldnt let ACCOUNTANTS run the war” that was your lame attempt to knock down what the GAO said.
October 12th, 2007 at 11:58 am>And as for “accountant†and “accountabilityâ€
>…I believe I used the term: “accountingâ€
whoops, too bad for you they invented the google so people like you can’t lie as easily.”Never let the accountants run the war. ”
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/07/thinkfast-september-7-2007/#comment-4063084
Again, look at a dictionary idiot. Accounting/accountants are NOT the same thing as accountability. Maybe what you meant to say is “never let ACCOUNTABLE people run the war.” at least wars you like.
Admit your an idiot with a poor vocabulary instead of trying to make excuses. Do you deny you blatantly misspelled “intelligent” as well?
October 12th, 2007 at 12:05 pm>Man adapts, the earth adapts, and there is no reason to believe either >won’t continue to do so.
Right, it happened before so it will happen again. Using this brilliant hypothesis we will all live forever and the sun will rise for eternity. I’m sorry, what university did you graduate from again?
October 12th, 2007 at 12:08 pmSo much for being the people of toleration, eh?
See Redstate.org. They are the epitome of toleration.
October 12th, 2007 at 12:19 pm>and generated less in revenues than “Snakes on a Planeâ€
lol. moron. you realize revenue is only relevant in the context of cost right?
business 101 mr. capitalist.
i didnt see lots of fancy computer generated animals in gore’s film.
>so even the cheapest of cheap can pick up a copy if they want to >look “worldly†to the liberal-bimbo women they drag home from bars
i prefer giving piggyback rides rather than dragging.
cut us some slack big-o, not everyone has the ability or desire get thier kicks from fondling thier stepchildren.. loL!
October 12th, 2007 at 12:19 pmhttp://www.gao.gov/
“The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) is known as “the investigative arm of Congress” and “the congressional watchdog.” ”
http://www.gao.gov/about.htm
HOW MANY PLACES DO YOU SEE the WORD “ACCOUNTANTS” ON THIS PAGE?
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/accountant
ac·count·ant
–noun a person whose profession is inspecting and auditing personal or commercial accounts.
n. One that keeps, audits, and inspects the financial records of individuals or business concerns and prepares financial and tax reports
VS.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/accountability
accountability
noun
responsibility to someone or for some activity
ac·count·a·ble :Liable to being called to account; answerable.
See Synonyms at responsible.
the state of being accountable, liable, or answerable.
again , these two words are NOT the same thing and you need to show me where on the GAO page it talks about how they are accountants and not investigators
October 12th, 2007 at 12:27 pm>And I did call the “GAO†the “Government Accounting Officeâ€, rather than >the official name: “Government Accountability Officeâ€.
Official versus WRONG.. ahahahah. idiot. I showed you the dictionary definitions of both AGAIN, plainly showing they have no similarities and yet still you insist..
October 12th, 2007 at 12:29 pmFirst thing GW666 and Darth Dick did this morning was to call Faux NonNews, Drug Rush, Limpballs, Insanity, Man Coultergist and told them to start the attacks, smear alway guys.
Buck Fush
October 12th, 2007 at 12:33 pmHey, BigMouth, I do believe it is your side of the toilet that is stained.
Buck Fush
October 12th, 2007 at 12:34 pmOne merely cannot honestly state that there is “consensus†on global warming, while at the same time acknowledging that scientists do not agree on the causes or effects of global warming.
Yes one can. Climate scientists agree in principle on the man-made causes and effects of global climate change. They disagree on some of the details.
Man adapts, the earth adapts, and there is no reason to believe either won’t continue to do so.
Comment by O. Bigfoot — October 12, 2007 @ 12:03 pm
Not disputing you there. The Earth will adapt. It has done so before and it will do it again. Over the next few decades and centuries the planet will reach a new stable equilibrium of temperature and atmospheric composition. And if past periods of runaway climate change are any indication, many species will become extinct in the process. Including possibly ours.
October 12th, 2007 at 12:36 pm>You folks have the right to be alarmists.
Right. And you’re just the guys who want to shred the constituion and turn the country into an unquestioned, challenged monarchy because of a group of people who are statistically about as likely to take our lives as lightning is?
Ah, the only irony you idiots can fathom is in your guns..
October 12th, 2007 at 12:59 pm>And a bit of advice to you: Never bring a knife to a gunfight.
Another bit of advice. Never enter a spelling bee with braindamage.
October 12th, 2007 at 1:04 pmbigfoot – do you have some notion that YOU may be able to change any minds here, make the commenters here stupid?
’cause the only other reason you are here is to get the
undue attention that your stoopidity generates…
just wonderin’…
October 12th, 2007 at 1:09 pm.
“The Day After TomArrow†– O. BigMouth
Guess that’s how they spell it in the south.
Buck Fush
October 12th, 2007 at 1:25 pm>> “The Day After TomArrow†– O. BigMouth
>Guess that’s how they spell it in the south.
Hey, O Bigfwat is just a common everyday joe, working hard, he doesnt have time to try and play scrabble with effette, elite snobs like us. He knows that just because we’re in the pocket of “big vocabulary” doesnt mean we’re smarter than him.
October 12th, 2007 at 1:30 pmthis is rich…
just heard on AP radio news that the limpballs is
directing al gore to give his winning to an actual Peace institution…
what a pusball…
October 12th, 2007 at 2:07 pm.
O. Bigfoot…
Still waiting on your wise intelligence that will explain the context of George W. Bush and Hitler and Stalin all being Nobel Peace Prize nominees.
October 12th, 2007 at 3:10 pmCorrection, should read “drama” not “documentary.” Most of the claims in the movie have been refuted, the movie has lost its “documentary” standing in the scientific community.
October 13th, 2007 at 1:37 amThe White House is Happy over Gore’s win …. The same White House that refused to respect the Kioto Protocol … What is this but “Hypocrisy with Excellence”.
The Nobel Peace prize is very politicised and it has lost its glory. Among the past Peace prize winners are:
Menachem Begin
Yitzahaq Rabin
Shimon Perez
The three Senior Leaders of the terrorist state of Israel.
Also on the list is:
Mohammad Al-Baradei and Anwar Sadat (You must be jocking).
Who else: Kofi Anan and the United Nations …. Goodness Gracious
Some more? What about: Henry Kissinger? Good grief.
Well … after all with this trend Mr. Ehud Olmert will qualify for the next term Awards.
Izzat Sajdi
October 13th, 2007 at 3:23 amhttp://www.izzat-sajdi.blogspot.com