Beck: CA wildifires hitting some ‘people who hate America.’
At least 10 different wildfires are raging across California, forcing hundreds of thousands of residents to flee their homes. “It’s a tragic time for California,” Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R-CA) said. Right-wing pundit Glenn Beck views the situation quite differently. On his radio show today, Beck said: “I think there is a handful of people who hate America. Unfortunately for them, a lot of them are losing their homes in a forest fire today.” Media Matters has the audio.
Sort Comments By: Top Rated | Date
What is it with the Reichtwingnutz?
They Hate real Americans day in and day out.
And newspapers and TV then dutifully publishes the bullshit.
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:15 pm“I think there is a handful of people who hate America. Unfortunately for them, a lot of them are losing their homes in a forest fire today. - - WTF??
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:16 pmwow
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:16 pmhe’s writing some big checks with that mouth
Beck: CA wildifires hitting some ‘people who hate America.’
I didn’t know Beck had a house there!
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:17 pmI hate Glenn Blech, but that’s not really news.
This little piss stained blabbermouth hasn’t ‘had time’ to serve.
He should be given ‘hard time to serve’ for all his racist, rambling
remarks.
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:17 pmWhat do you expect from a guy who asked the first Muslim elected to Congress if he is working with the enemy? Beck puts the ‘ass’ in ‘dumbass’.
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:18 pmWow…just wow.
And these people really wanted a better life for Iraqis?
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:19 pmThe beckster will continue to spiral in as he becomes less and less relevant over the next year.
Even some of the worst Reich Wingers have abandoned this Nazi-wannabe, as per his ratings loss.
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:20 pmYeah, them Marines in Camp Pendleton and sailors on San Diego really do hate America, huh, Glenda?
What a f*&king jerk!
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:20 pmOops! “in” San Diego…
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:21 pmthat’s funny. Beck says he thinks.
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:22 pmMonday Morning Quarterbacking is OK for football games. Claiming that the Malibu fires are a result of God’s vindictiveness against the Hollywood types is absolutely no different that the Islams calling their terrorist attacks against the “infidels” Allah’s will. Neither God nor Allah is a registered Republican contrary to what bushco an sycophats would have us believe. Are these people so weak and insecure they must invoke some imagined superpower to give them creditability? And to think that even Harry Potter’s mom bowed to the Repugs and outed from the closet one of the great leaders of the Hogwarts.
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:24 pmDid you read his whole commentary over there?
WTF?
Is that guy on meds or is all the incoherent rambling the result of no meds?
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:27 pmHmmm, kinda like 9/11 happened because of the gays? What the hell is wrong with these people? I know, I know.
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:28 pmIs that guy on meds or is all the incoherent rambling the result of no meds?
Comment by Frosty Cupcake — October 22, 2007 @ 4:27 pm
Indeed. It makes absolutely no sense at all.
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:28 pmWhat is wrong w/this guy?!?!? I’ve got friends in the fire area, Glenn, you dumbass sack of shit. Care about your fellow Americans much? Or are your ill chosen words only another sop to some lame-ass radio audience? Bet you don’t repeat this canard on tv. Too ugly for broadcast on CNN, but ok for the radio, so it can be echoed in the bs echo chamber?
Think of the people who actually live there, if you can figure out how to do that…
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:29 pmWhat do you expect from a guy who asked the first Muslim elected to Congress if he is working with the enemy? Beck puts the ‘ass’ in ‘dumbass’.
Comment by Bob — October 22, 2007 @ 4:18 pm
I find this comment insulting to both donkeys and butts.
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:30 pmIt is no small irony that the language of Beck and Fats Limbaugh etc.. is verbatim of Joe McCarthy. Same act, same bullshit. Just change out commies for whatever filth the wingnuts are spewing at that moment and voila! we are right back at HUAC with Nixon and Roy Cohn.
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:30 pmThis is the same jerkoff who stated if NYC was nuked, he’d be OK because he lives in Conn.
He’s not only a first class prick, he’s as stupid as Bush.
Or Rummy.
Or Cheney.
Or…
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:30 pmI had no idea wildfires were selective and only burned down the houses of the liberal Democrats. Thank God all those rich white Republican houses were spared, right Beck?
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:31 pmSo…
If you truly hate America, you hate God, who will get you for it.
This is not so different than when people said that we who lived in the sinful city of New Orleans deserved the flooding caused by the Army Corp of Engineers.
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:31 pmI live in San Diego where 8 fires are burning. Most business is shut down and I have a friend that has lost a house in Ramona (including three horses that they had to leave behind) I think I speak for most of San Diego when I say “F#@k Glen Beck”.
Sincerely,
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:31 pmAnd to think that even Harry Potter’s mom bowed to the Repugs and outed from the closet one of the great leaders of the Hogwarts.
-Comment by Clyde the Ripper
BUSH IS GAY?
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:36 pmwtf???
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:39 pmA quarter of a million people are evacuating their homes.
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:40 pmFor anyone to find pleasure in the loss and devastation is beyond the pale.
Beck has shown (again) the callousness and sub-human nature of his desire to be relevant.
I had no idea Glenn Beck claimed to have an inside track to God more than the rest of us — similar to Pat Robertson or the late Jerry Falwell.
Or maybe Beck is just showing his ignorance on the demographics of California. He obviously thinks the only people who live in California are far-left liberals. Southern California, where the fires are raging, is home to both Orange and San Diego counties — probably the two most conservative counties in the state. Many of the victims of the fires are conservatives, some of whom no doubt listen to Beck’s show. Or DID.
Does Glenn Beck think Duncan Hunter, one of the most conservative GOP Congressmen, “hates” America? Does Beck know that Hunter represents a district profoundly affected by these fires?
Does Beck know he’s a complete idiot?
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:41 pmThe first building lost in Malibu was the Presbyterian church. Burned to the ground. I don’t know the church or its parishoners, but I wonder if Beck thinks that congregation hates America?
The Presbyterian church is right above Pepperdine. Home to Kenneth Starr, Dean of the Law School. One of those “hate America” lefties, no doubt.
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:42 pmWell, truth be told, Ken Starr DOES seem to hate America. Or at least he did in the late nineties.
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:44 pmIt is part of their game plan to make ALL AMERICANS be supicious and hateful of ALL other Americans. They want you to HATE, it is their plan to be able to lable anyone they want as America Haters…it is EASIER TO LOCK ANYONE THEY WANT UP WHEN GW666 DECLARES MARTIAL LAW.
They are trying to start a Civil War here, just read some of the posts on the REDHATE site, they want an excuse to KILL people they disagree with.
Buck Fush
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:45 pmWe don’t hate America - WE HATE YOU BECK!
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:47 pmI have to say, just when you think this tool can’t get his head any father up his own ass, he manages another inch or two. Does he even know the politcal make-up of the San Diego area? Not exactly a “blue” town with all the military and defense contractors in the area. Perhaps he’ll finally annoy some of CNN’s corporate sponsors that TimeWarner will actually bow to (Martin Marietta, General Dynamics–are you listening?) and Beck will finally get the plug pulled. You’d have to think they’d welcome an excuse to drop this money-loser.
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:48 pmIs there no catastrophe that the ridiculous radical right won’t try to confabulate into some sort of sign that their side is right and the other side is wrong?
What’s scary is that I’m sure there were people who were listening to that blather and nodded to themselves in agreement.
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:49 pmI guess my first comment was too profane to get through the filter. I have brothers and sisters who have already evacuated their homes. Glenn Beck is a hateful piece of filth.
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:49 pmdoes this kind of childish remark still offend? i don’t know what’s more immature, making this statement or reacting to it.
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:50 pmBeck: CA wildifires hitting some ‘people who hate America.’
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:50 pmIt appears with this comment it is Beck that hates America.
Not to nit pick, TP, but you have a typo…
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:51 pmwildifires
should be
wildfires
does this kind of childish remark still offend? i don’t know what’s more immature, making this statement or reacting to it.
Comment by spearNmagicHelmet — October 22, 2007 @ 4:50 pm
Oh, and aren’t we smug and superior, troll?
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:51 pm#30 Winski
To him, it’s the same thing.
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:55 pmComment by spearNmagicHelmet — October 22, 2007 @ 4:50 pm
I’ve noticed a new kind of troll lately. It is similar to the concern troll. It is the smug troll. The strategy is clear: try to undercut legitimate outrage by pretending that nothing outrageous has been said or done. Nothing to see here, folks! Move along now, move along!
I’ve know your game troll, so take it somewhere else.
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:56 pmTo add to the comments above about the church, the destroyed Malibu Castle is owned by Lilly Lawrence, the philanthropist daughter of Reza Fallah, once the oil minister for the Shah of Iran. A real lefty, Beck.
October 22nd, 2007 at 5:00 pmI can understand some people saying this 10,000 years ago before it was very well understood how the world worked—–but in 2007 AD???
Did all those years as an alcoholic leave his brain damaged? Or does he not believe what he says but is just hoping for ratings?
October 22nd, 2007 at 5:01 pm#39
My other favorite kind of troll is the “I’m a regular reader of TP and normally agree with the articles here, but…” then this person I’ve never seen before launches an attack about how unfair the article is.
Anyway, yeah, they’re kind of funny, in an obvious, weird sort of way.
October 22nd, 2007 at 5:01 pmspearNmagicHelmet
LOL
That’s what my girlfriend calls my… well… you know…
October 22nd, 2007 at 5:03 pmOh, and aren’t we smug and superior, troll?
Comment by VerbalKint — October 22, 2007 @ 4:51 pm
if you say so.
October 22nd, 2007 at 5:04 pmSomeone who chose spearNmagicHelmet as his name is calling someone else childish?
October 22nd, 2007 at 5:05 pmTed Turner has stated many times that selling CNN to Time Warner was “the biggest mistake I ever made”.
CNN has been going downhill ever since.
October 22nd, 2007 at 5:07 pmdoes this kind of childish remark still offend? i don’t know what’s more immature, making this statement or reacting to it.
Comment by spearNmagicHelmet — October 22, 2007 @ 4:50 pm
Oh, and aren’t we smug and superior, troll?
Comment by VerbalKint — October 22, 2007 @ 4:51 pm
You’re right, VK — but through the smugness, this troll doesn’t see the hypocrisy of his remark. It’s OK to react with great moral indignation if you’re a Republican. In fact, the proper thing for Republicans to do when they’ve been offended by words is to get a Senate resolution passed condemning it. But when Don Imus makes racist and sexist remarks, when Ann Coulter insults Jews, when Rush Limbaugh disses our soldiers, when working families get swiftboated, and when Glenn Beck asserts that victims of wildfires somehow deserve their misfortune because they “hate” America — well, any reaction to any of that is “immature”.
This troll is like all the rest…
October 22nd, 2007 at 5:08 pmif you say so.
Comment by spearNmagicHelmet — October 22, 2007 @ 5:04 pm
How about sticking around a little while on this thread and finding out what other people here think about you.
October 22nd, 2007 at 5:09 pmRight on, missmolly. How is that for laying it bare, troll?
October 22nd, 2007 at 5:10 pmBeck is correct…if he’s talking about Duke Cunningham’s house. Hehehehe….
October 22nd, 2007 at 5:10 pmSomeone who chose spearNmagicHelmet as his name is calling someone else childish?
all i was saying is getting all excited about someone who uses phrases like ‘hates america’ is pointless. all you accomplish is what they want, that is, to talk about the outrage and not the actual problem.
and yeah, i’m more than a little cynical and sarcastic. can you blame me?
PEACE
October 22nd, 2007 at 5:10 pmSomeone who chose spearNmagicHelmet as his name is calling someone else childish?
Comment by Keith — October 22, 2007 @ 5:05 pm
It is a game played by members of the Society for Creative Anachronism.
October 22nd, 2007 at 5:10 pmBeck apparently has never been to So. Cal, or he’d know that in East and North County (where the SD fires are burning), the homeowners are majority conservative.
Talk about shooting yourself in the foot…
October 22nd, 2007 at 5:11 pmComment by spearNmagicHelmet — October 22, 2007 @ 5:04 pm
How about sticking around a little while on this thread and finding out what other people here think about you.
Comment by VerbalKint — October 22, 2007 @ 5:09 pm
This troll is relevant enough to think about??
Hows that? =)
October 22nd, 2007 at 5:14 pmAll those liberal Hollywood types like President Ron and Nancy Reagan, John Wayne, Bob Hope, President Fred Thompson, Bruce Willis, Gimme Moore, Mel Gibson, Chuck Norris, Cong. Sonny Bono, John Milius, etc.?!?!
October 22nd, 2007 at 5:20 pmWait… What?
October 22nd, 2007 at 5:21 pmMaybe Beck was thinking of Charlton Heston….
October 22nd, 2007 at 5:22 pmIn Beck’s geopolitical map of the US, Orange county, San Diego counties, and Malibu are the hot beds of liberalism -you know, the America-hatin’ kind.
How does an obviously mental case like Beck get their own radio show?
(Please ThinkProgress, stop calling this man a “pundit”. Or at least put his self-given title in quotes.)
October 22nd, 2007 at 5:25 pmtalk about the outrage and not the actual problem.
Comment by spearNmagicHelmet — October 22, 2007 @ 5:10 pm
I would say the “actual problem” is that global warming, caused by conservative policies promoted by Glen Beck, is causing the increase in number and severity of forest fires.
This was one of the stories on 60 Minutes last night. Fire experts said that:
October 22nd, 2007 at 5:31 pm1) the last seven years have produced seven of the ten worst fire seasons in history.
2)Tree rings show that the last 15 years have been the hottest in 1,000 years.
3)An increase of one degree will cause four times as many fires.
4)We can lose one half of all forests in the western US over the next 30-100 years due to global warming.
I was wondering when the talking heads would start saying the fire was because of the progressives in California. You know they are open about homosexuality and all. Bet O’Reilly will have to put his 2 cents in as well. Yeah, must be those atheists out there that believe in freedom of choice.
You just have to wonder if these people are real or just paid so well to act so stupid.
October 22nd, 2007 at 5:32 pm#59 - Saw that then today John Stotsel’s show Friday was quoted deneying everything and the scientists were being threatened that said there wasn’t a global warming, even climate change.
Funny how the word threaten always comes up when the Republicans are trying to smear the opposite side. Republicans really need some new writting material.
Oh and now another Osama tape has been released, such a coincidence just when Bush wants more money.
October 22nd, 2007 at 5:35 pmRight, Nevar, I left out Charlton Heston. I also left out our governor The Terminator who I just saw on CNN. He still cannot pronounce the name of the state!!!
October 22nd, 2007 at 5:37 pmSpeechless… I am without speech.
October 22nd, 2007 at 5:37 pmBeck also once said on his radio show that he’d like to kill Michael Moore. This was a few months before he got his TV show. Did he get in trouble for publically inciting violence on a public figure? No. He got his own television show. Those lefties running the media sure are cagey. They’re obviously trying to fool us into believing the mainstream media is run by a bunch of corporatist conservative crackpots.
October 22nd, 2007 at 5:45 pmRupert Murdoch owns 20th Century Fox.
October 22nd, 2007 at 5:48 pmBeck’s boss owns Warner Brothers.
October 22nd, 2007 at 5:49 pmKeith, you seem a reasoned individual but I am afraid that you at 59 is going to bring on the local “no such thing as climate change either natural, human induced, or human aggrevated” crew.
October 22nd, 2007 at 5:56 pm#61 Stossel is a flaming idiot and a hardcore AGW denier. I suspect he is getting paid to deny AGW.
October 22nd, 2007 at 6:08 pmDoesn’t this puke’s show originate in Atlanta?
Those racist, red-neck crackers are facing massive drought because they attacked Max Cleland, rigged voting machines and passed voter photo ID laws. That really made the rain godess mad!
And these states-righters, take responsibilities want Dubya to bail them out! What hypocrites!
October 22nd, 2007 at 6:14 pmThis is nothing,
October 22nd, 2007 at 6:17 pmYou must have missed his explanation today of how World Trade Center 7 collapsed.
“World Trade Centers 1 and 2 fell on it.”
Comment by dbadass — October 22, 2007 @ 5:56 pm
The topic is ‘WILDFIRES”. 60 Minutes last night had experts saying the number and severity of the wildfires are increased by global warming. You say I am not allowed to mention this for fear of the wingnut response out there???
October 22nd, 2007 at 6:21 pmHollywood liberal Chuck Norris just endorsed Huckabee for President.
October 22nd, 2007 at 6:22 pmSorry Keith I was commenting on those who come hear to look for reasons to deny any and all aspects of climate science. The joke was intended to be on them, not you. You are free to post anything you wish as are they. Sorry for any confusion.
October 22nd, 2007 at 6:29 pmMaybe if our National Guard and all their equipment were not in Iraq they could battle the fires.
October 22nd, 2007 at 6:30 pmChuck Norris is one badass crackpot!
October 22nd, 2007 at 6:30 pm“The sky is falling! The sky is falling! Liberal idiots”
Gay marriage somehow never defined threatens heteromarriage. Conservative cretins
October 22nd, 2007 at 6:32 pmComment by michael — October 22, 2007 @ 6:29 pm
These “idiots” are scientists who know a hell of a lot more about the subject than you could ever dream of. Their statements are facts. Not opinions. There are actually records kept of number of acres burned over the years, temperatures for every day and every location, etc. There actually are records kept.
October 22nd, 2007 at 6:33 pmSorry dbadass. Read you wrong.
October 22nd, 2007 at 6:35 pmActually. he’s going to deny that he was referring to the entire population. He was only talking about a few scattered people who Hate America.
He is instead referring to the Ancient and Secret Order of Masonic He-Man America-Haters and Evildoers society, founded in a mansion in Hollywood by Fatty Arbuckle and Theda Bara in 1921, and which is currently presided over by Larry David. These America-hater are responsible for all the sexuality, bad language and bad portrayals of bsnkers and congresmen in movies, not to mention rock and roll, marijuana, and the stagnation of John Milius’s career.
October 22nd, 2007 at 6:39 pmIt’s those people, with their secret handshakes, their wild orgies and fabulous lunches, and uncanny influence over vast swathes of America, that he oppposes.
Now the National Guard is used to put out fires?
Comment by michael — October 22, 2007 @ 6:33 pm
You are joking, right? What do you think the mission of the National Guard is?
October 22nd, 2007 at 6:44 pmfour California National Guard UH-60 helicopters were fighting the fire and the state had requested help from the New Mexico National Guard
October 22nd, 2007 at 6:44 pm2)Tree rings show that the last 15 years have been the hottest in 1,000 years.
Comment by Keith — October 22, 2007 @ 5:31 pm
Why was it so hot in 1007 A.D?
October 22nd, 2007 at 6:45 pmCould someone please ask Michael a question? I love that!
October 22nd, 2007 at 6:45 pmhttp://www.earthtimes.org/ articles/ show/ news_press_release,176495.shtml
Comment by michael — October 22, 2007 @ 6:43 pm
You post something from the Hudson Foundation? BAHAHAHA, you might as well have posted a link to the Heritage Foundation!!!!!
These guys are even more dishonest and disreputable than YOU ARE - and that says a lot michael!!!
October 22nd, 2007 at 6:46 pmNow the National Guard is used to put out fires?
Comment by michael — October 22, 2007 @ 6:33 pm
Not now–not any more, mikey. However, before Bush, who got into the National Guard to avoid going to Vietnam but is now using it for soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan, used to help out in natural disasters and other emergencies like this and Hurricane Katrina. Neo-CON idiot!
October 22nd, 2007 at 6:46 pmFor michael, another know-it-all “patriot,” from the Army National Guard site:
For over 360 years the citizen soldiers of the Army National Guard have come to the aid of their neighbors during times of need. The Guard plays a key role during floods, fires and other natural disasters.
October 22nd, 2007 at 6:47 pmNow the National Guard is used to put out fires?
Comment by michael — October 22, 2007 @ 6:33 pm
They’re used in all sorts of national emergencies.
You probably didn’t know they had specific equipment for the task - did you? Wow, were you home schooled, or just born retarded michael?
http://www.nextparadigm.com/viewpoints/MAFFS.htm
October 22nd, 2007 at 6:48 pmThe sky is falling! The sky is falling! Liberal idiots!
Comment by michael — October 22, 2007 @ 6:29 pm
Well to hear a Limbaugh or O’Reilly diatribe on ‘global terrorism’, one would think! Your SELF CRITICISM is HYSTERICAL as always michael, even if you aren’t smart enough to get that YOU are the JOKE!
October 22nd, 2007 at 6:49 pmGoogle search shows National Guard in every state being used as firefighters. From the air and on foot. Not only are half the personnel in Iraq, but so are half the equipment. Michael is ignorant.
October 22nd, 2007 at 6:49 pmmichael?
what do you think of Beck’s statement?
thanks?
October 22nd, 2007 at 6:49 pmlmao, ralph!
October 22nd, 2007 at 6:50 pmThanks to Candyce for schooling Michael on something about which most Americans are intuitively aware. Our various National Guards have always been there for natual emergencies. And congrats to Michael for “kneejerking” his foot right into his mouth.
October 22nd, 2007 at 6:51 pmAh come on guys don’t hassle Michael about that National Guard stuff. He has a superior nonpublic education and is a sophisticated debater. Don’t believe me, ask him.
October 22nd, 2007 at 6:52 pmThen who guards our nation? The Bush twins?
October 22nd, 2007 at 6:53 pm“What do you think the mission of the National Guard is?
Comment by Candyceâ€
To fight in Iraq!
Comment by michael — October 22, 2007 @ 6:51 pm
BAHAHA, poor little homeschooled ‘tard! You WOULD believe that - but she said WHAT DO YOU THINK? So far you haven’t demonstrated you THINK about anything, michael?
October 22nd, 2007 at 6:53 pm“I suspect he is getting paid to deny AGW.
Comment by VerbalKint â€
“And I suspect that even if YOU were getting paid to support it you couldn’t, in your own words, elaborate why.”
Michael
Why do you say that Michael?
Why is the sky blue Michael?
Why do the majority of Americans hate you and your ilk Michael?
Why don’t you post something rational instead of driveby questions, dipsht?
October 22nd, 2007 at 6:53 pmBetter to use the National guard over there so as to not have them come here. What was that again about the sky is falling. Sissy righties
October 22nd, 2007 at 6:54 pm“what do you think of Beck’s statement?
thanks?
Comment by ralph the wonder llamaâ€
Which one?
Comment by michael — October 22, 2007 @ 6:53 pm
Ah, michael, do try to stay on topic - since we all know your ADHD is a real problem for you, OK?
October 22nd, 2007 at 6:54 pmTo fight in Iraq!
Comment by michael — October 22, 2007 @ 6:51 pm
No, no. You don’t get off that easily. Why do you think the National Guard wouldn’t be involved in natural disaster situations? Please be specific, yet brief.
October 22nd, 2007 at 6:55 pmHow do you know that Avery is a wingnut? He quotes Fred Singer as his SOURCE and PROOF!!! The guy who was completely discredited on every theory he has - the man who isn’t even trained in climatology!!!
Poor michael, is showing his sad, pathetic little wine soaked dementia ridden idiocy again!
October 22nd, 2007 at 6:55 pmPoor Fred Singer doesn’t think UV radiation causes skin cancer - this is michael’s RESOURCE!! BAHAHAAHA, poor little ‘tardS!
October 22nd, 2007 at 6:56 pmWhich one?
Comment by michael — October 22, 2007 @ 6:53 pm
Ah, michael, do try to stay on topic - since we all know your ADHD is a real problem for you, OK?
Comment by republicans hate facts — October 22, 2007 @ 6:54 pm
Wow, that’s some serious short attention span, eh?
October 22nd, 2007 at 6:57 pmWhy can’t you answer a simple question on the topic, michael?
October 22nd, 2007 at 6:57 pmAnd why can’t you answer the question?
Comment by michael — October 22, 2007 @ 6:56 pm
Why can’t you? retardation? dementia? psychosis?
October 22nd, 2007 at 6:57 pmThanks Ralph, you beat me to it. Michael’s entire goal is to ask rhetorical nonsense questions that derail threads.
Can’t blame him though, if your goal was to defend GW you really wouldn’t have much to work with. Better to just derail a thread than defend why the National Guard is protecting Bush’s ego instead of functioning as intended.
October 22nd, 2007 at 6:57 pmWhy can’t you answer a simple question on the topic, michael?
Comment by ralph the wonder llama — October 22, 2007 @ 6:57 pm
Little ‘tards like michael think looking stupid is being funny - they’re sorta the dementia retirement version of jack@ss the movie!
October 22nd, 2007 at 6:58 pmReally? Which ones are you referring to?
Comment by michael — October 22, 2007 @ 6:57 pm
You posted the link to a discredited site that references discredited scientists as its ‘proof’!!! Poor little dementia-tard!
October 22nd, 2007 at 6:59 pmPoor michael is so stupid he doesn’t even know his posts show EXACTLY how stupid he is! Now THAT is STUPID!
October 22nd, 2007 at 6:59 pmMichael is trolling with red herrings. Don’t take the bait, it’s an empty meal.
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:00 pmtough time concentrating, michael?
distracted by getting your a$$ kicked by Candyce?
can I make it easier for you?
What’s your take on Beck’s statement: I think there is a handful of people who hate America. Unfortunately for them, a lot of them are losing their homes in a forest fire today., michael?
thanks?
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:01 pmWhy do you say that nanlichi?
Michael
There little guy, beat you to it.
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:01 pmAre you going to tell us which of his theories have been discredited?
Comment by michael — October 22, 2007 @ 7:00 pm
All of them, dementia man! Or didn’t you know that? Of course not, you only know how to repost propaganda from the oil industry! Poor dementia-tard!
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:01 pm2)Tree rings show that the last 15 years have been the hottest in 1,000 years.
Comment by Keith — October 22, 2007 @ 5:31 pm
And it was so hot 1000 years ago….why?
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:02 pmSo michael, if there are 500 articles that debunk global warming, why does Avery only list the discredited work of Singer - that WASN’T PEER REVIEWED?
Poor little dementia-tard!
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:02 pmOkay Michael has gotten the attention he so needs. Time to move on.
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:03 pmReally? Which ones are you referring to?
Comment by michael — October 22, 2007 @ 6:57 pm
The theory on why you a self professed Navy veteran did not know what an NEC was/is, maybe?
You are so full of BS questions, but you can never back up anything you say….
What a loser……
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:04 pmOkay Michael has gotten the attention he so needs. Time to move on.
Comment by dbadass — October 22, 2007 @ 7:03 pm
Not yet, he’s still looking for the mens room… Keltoi at Night, care to give him a hand?
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:05 pmYou are so full of BS questions, but you can never back up anything you say….
What a loser……
Comment by Wayne — October 22, 2007 @ 7:04 pm
Why does michael have to back up his questions?
All he does is ask questions?
He never answers them?
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:05 pmOkay Michael has gotten the attention he so needs. Time to move on.
Comment by dbadass — October 22, 2007 @ 7:03 pm
Excellent! Now someone can explain why it was so hot 1000 years ago!
2)Tree rings show that the last 15 years have been the hottest in 1,000 years.
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:07 pmComment by Keith — October 22, 2007 @ 5:31 pm
You think the congregation of the Presbyterian church was a bunch of America haters, michael? Really?
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:08 pmComment by Keltoi at Night — October 22, 2007 @ 7:02 pm
There are changes in global temperature that have occurred that were NOT man-made. But if you have a natural increase and at the same time have a very very severe mad-made increase—then we are in big trouble.
99% of scientists agree with me on this. The only scientists who do not agree are those being paid lots of money by polluters like Exxon. Sometimes laundered through the Heritage/Hudson Foundation.
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:09 pmYou better believe that these right wingers were giddy over New York City getting hit on 9-11, too. Some of them are even openly saying they hope New York City gets hit again.
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:09 pmAnd it was so hot 1000 years ago….why?
Comment by Keltoi at Night — October 22, 2007 @ 7:02 pm
We could explain it to you again, but then you’d just ignore the explanation.
Here’s one small link if you want to educate yourself, junior. Please note that ALL of this research was accounted for in the IPCC report and the research that exists on global warming.
What Avery (michael’s retarded GOP link) does is claim that any article that discusses one point of global warming means that it denounces it - like the tree-ring issue. However that’s a complete distortion of the science and the consensus.
It’s a non-scientist denying the consensus with an unscientific press release. Typical wingnut hysteria and disinformation - nothing more!
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:10 pmI think he is correct only it’s more than a handful if they live in Malibu.
Comment by michael — October 22, 2007 @ 7:06 pm
Haha! My tactic worked to draw michael out from his feces-strewn cave and answer a question.
Strangely enough, his answer reveals him to be a heartless sub-human who celebrates the tragedies that befall others. What were the odds THAT would happen?
Or maybe it’s just the Assbarger’s Syndrome?
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:11 pmI think he is correct only it’s more than a handful if they live in Malibu.
Comment by michael — October 22, 2007 @ 7:06 pm
Hateful b!tch!
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:11 pmYou CAN’T answer the question, can you? You still haven’t told me the box # on my DD214 that contains my NEC. Is that because you are just another phony soldier?
Comment by michael — October 22, 2007 @ 7:11 pm
Says the coward that never served in combat but slanders real soldiers! You’re a PHONY SOLDIER michael!
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:12 pmThere are changes in global temperature that have occurred that were NOT man-made.
Comment by Keith — October 22, 2007 @ 7:09 pm
Thank you, that had to hurt.
How do the “99% of scientists who agree with you” explain the retreat of polar ice caps on Mars?
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:13 pmWho’s a real soldier?
Comment by michael — October 22, 2007 @ 7:13 pm
Not you! Phony!
No, just stupid liberals.
Comment by michael — October 22, 2007 @ 7:12 pm
Spoken like a true NAZI - they gassed and burned liberals just like you’re calling for!
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:14 pmYou’re a PHONY SOLDIER michael!
Comment by republicans hate facts — October 22, 2007 @ 7:12 pm
Everybody here who pays any attention knows this.
michael may convince himself we don’t, but either way, he’s got nothing to lose by continuing the farce. It’s not like he’s got any credibility to save if he owns up to his lie.
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:14 pmThank you, that had to hurt.
How do the “99% of scientists who agree with you†explain the retreat of polar ice caps on Mars?
Comment by Keltoi at Night — October 22, 2007 @ 7:13 pm
Oh good grief, not that stupid one again? You really are completely ignorant aren’t you?
Here, go educate yourself, so you stop sounding so stupid!
http://www.realclimate.org/ index.php/ archives/ 2005/ 10/ global-warming-on-mars/
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:15 pm“Strangely enough, his answer reveals him to be a heartless sub-human who celebrates the tragedies that befall others.
Comment by ralph the wonder llamaâ€
No, just stupid liberals.
Comment by michael — October 22, 2007 @ 7:12 pm
“Stupid liberals”? Like the congregation of the Malibu Presbyterian Church, michael?
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:15 pmSome people were glad when the tsunami hit Phuket, Thailand because there were allegedly people there having sex. Like God smiting Sodom and Gomorrah. Ditto NYC and New Orleans.
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:16 pmSome people were glad when the tsunami hit Phuket, Thailand because there were allegedly people there having sex. Like God smiting Sodom and Gomorrah. Ditto NYC and New Orleans.
Comment by Keith — October 22, 2007 @ 7:16 pm
yeah, except for the fact that in New Orleans it destroyed almost all of the churches - but the gay neighborhood was apparently untouched! Jon Stewart did a funny bit on that one!
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:18 pmHow do the “99% of scientists who agree with you†explain the retreat of polar ice caps on Mars?
Comment by Keltoi at Night — October 22, 2007 @ 7:13 pm
Nice one, Keitol! I expect that, since these retreating Martian ice caps indicate a solar-system-wide warming, there would be similar affects observed on Venus, Jupiter and Saturn?
Otherwise that kind of blows your suggested theory out of the water and leaves us with the assumption that the climates of Mars and of Earth are different dynamic systems, right?
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:18 pmThank you, that had to hurt.
How do the “99% of scientists who agree with you†explain the retreat of polar ice caps on Mars?
Comment by Keltoi at Night — October 22, 2007 @ 7:13 pm
1)No it didn’t hurt at all.
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:20 pm2)That is an example of warming that was NOT man-made
3)Boy, you are dense.
1) “What do you think the mission of the National Guard is?
Comment by Candyceâ€
To fight in Iraq!
Comment by michael — October 22, 2007 @ 6:51 pm
2) Strangely enough, his answer reveals him to be a heartless sub-human who celebrates the tragedies that befall others.
Comment by ralph the wonder llamaâ€
No, just stupid liberals.
Comment by michael —
1) So you think that the mission of the National Guard, which has existed for over 300 years, is to fight in Iraq, eh? Was that its mission a century or two ago, or during the Vietnam War, michael moron?
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:22 pm2) You have claimed here to have attended Pepperdine University, but you don’t seem to care that it has been in the fire’s path. Not that I ever believed, considering your lower elementary school-level spelling and lack of knowledge about subjects as basic as the National Guard, that you ever attended even a second-rate university, michael moron.
I hope a GOOD, outdoorsy Californian, preferably a Vet wounded by the LIES of TRAITOR Bush the MURDERER coxucker PUNK,
uses his MILITARY RIFLE on Beck.
End of story.
End of Nazi scum.
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:24 pmReally? michael claimed to have attended Pepperdine?
Then he would have been familiar with the Maliu Presbyterian Church. And still he reacts as callously as this: I think (Beck) is correct only it’s more than a handful if they live in Malibu when the church burns to the ground.
What a dick.
Of course, the other explanation is that he lied about attending Pepperdine.
Which is it, michael? Or you a liar or a dick?
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:26 pm“Some people were glad when the tsunami hit Phuket, Thailand because there were allegedly people there having sex.
Comment by Keithâ€
No, because there were people wearing osama bin laden t-shirts!
Comment by michael — October 22, 2007 @ 7:22 pm
The Bin Laden family FINANCED George aWol Bush’s failed oil companies.
His OTHER Saudi Buddies have been FINANCING Al Queda in Iraq.
George is a COXUCKER punk TRAITOR to the USA…
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:27 pmMichael is right. In 1636 the National Guard was created because they knew that in 2003 W would not have enough Army and Marine troops for his crusade in Iraq!
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:31 pmYou CAN’T answer the question, can you? You still haven’t told me the box # on my DD214 that contains my NEC. Is that because you are just another phony soldier?
Comment by michael — October 22, 2007 @ 7:11 pm
As I said before, if you cannot tell me which of the 2 types of dd214 you have, how can anyone tell you which area has your NEC, which you should f*(king know, idiot!!!
Give it up loser.
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:32 pm“Now the National Guard is used to put out fires?”
Comment by michael —
Is there any clearer proof that Troll Michael isn’t an American citizen?
If he doesn’t know the Guard is responsible for assisting states to fight fires, it just means he doesn’t know because he doesn’t really live here.
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:33 pmMan, has anyone seen a troll ass-whuppin’ like this in a long, long time?
michael sure is a glutton for punishment?
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:36 pmI didn’t know what you were referring to by NEC.
Comment by Michael — September 28, 2007 @ 5:10 pm
I didn’t know what you were referring to by NEC.
Comment by Michael — September 28, 2007 @ 5:10 pm
I didn’t know what you were referring to by NEC.
Comment by Michael — September 28, 2007 @ 5:10 pm
I didn’t know what you were referring to by NEC.
Comment by Michael — September 28, 2007 @ 5:10 pm
LMAO!!
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:38 pmmichael sure is a glutton for punishment?
Comment by ralph the wonder llama — October 22, 2007 @ 7:36 pm
Short attention span, he gets whacked and comes back later to deny it.
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:41 pmComment by ralph the wonder llama — October 22, 2007 @ 7:36 pm
michael always gets trashed, spanked, whupped and whipped up and down the threads where he posts his “questions”, but always seems unaware of what is happening around him.
If you point it out, he usually replies:
“Really? How so?
Point me where?”
or some other equally moronic answer…
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:42 pmNo, because there were people wearing osama bin laden t-shirts!
Comment by michael — October 22, 2007 @ 7:22 pm
So they were just like you then, a Republican? You’re sounding more insane by the day, dementia-tard!
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:44 pmmichael always gets trashed, spanked, whupped and whipped up and down the threads where he posts his “questionsâ€, but always seems unaware of what is happening around him.
Comment by Gregor Samsa — October 22, 2007 @ 7:42 pm
Agreed, but this seemed even more brutal than usual, as he got spanked on around four different subjects — everytime he opened his mouth to introduce another distraction, it backfired on him.
He’s like our little catnip mouse.
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:46 pmAnyone who opines on the role of the National Guard, without knowing their long standing role in fire fighting, is unworthy of notice.
As for Mr. Beck, I don’t know what disturbs me more. His, fundamentally, unchallenged notion that the areas affected are liberal strongholds. Or the notion that anyone may deserve a catastrophe because of political leanings. Either notion supports the conclusion that Mr. Beck is a creepy little snot; stuck to the bottom of the table of the “news media”.
If he believes that fire is seeking out the homes of “America haters”? He should be confined and treated.
On a related note…
I wonder how many of the “America hating” citizens of S. Ca. will face indefinite stays is trailers because, their insurance company declares fire “an act of God”? At least they had the sense to not rely on levees built, maintained and guaranteed by the U.S. Govt.
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:46 pmIf you point it out, he usually replies:
“Really? How so?
Point me where?â€
or some other equally moronic answer…
Comment by Gregor Samsa — October 22, 2007 @ 7:42 pm
Poor old ‘tard is so dementia laden and ‘out of date’, he probably thinks he’s being funny. Instead, he’s just being sad, pathetic, and foolish - like oh so many GOP ‘tools’. They’ll degrade themselves and look more and more stupid in their ‘loyalty’, poor little terrorist sympathizers!
I mean, how else can you explain them protecting a GOP CIA agent named Ali Mohamed even after he planned the first WTC bombing AND THEY KNEW IT? Heck, Mukasey was the JUDGE that protected him? Then you have the matter of Bush being bailed out in Arbusto by the Bin Ladens - and now Osama is ‘no-threat’! Wow, sure, Georgie/michael! Yeah, these wingnuts are too funny with calling everyone else a terrorist, while protecting their extremist friends!
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:48 pmHow do the “99% of scientists who agree with you†explain the retreat of polar ice caps on Mars?
Comment by Keltoi at Night — October 22, 2007 @ 7:13 pm
Nice one, Keitol! I expect that, since these retreating Martian ice caps indicate a solar-system-wide warming, there would be similar affects observed on Venus, Jupiter and Saturn?
Otherwise that kind of blows your suggested theory out of the water and leaves us with the assumption that the climates of Mars and of Earth are different dynamic systems, right?
Comment by ralph the wonder llama — October 22, 2007 @ 7:18 pm
This is the danger of non-Scientists debating techinical issues that must remain obscure - it becomes a battle of websites, where all you have to do is say “your website sucks, mine rules.” For example, I THINK Venus is too hot for ice caps and Jupiter and Saturn are Gas giants much, much farther away from the Sun and so might not expect the same effect in fluctuations of solar activity.
And RHF, I went to your site, read the explanation, I had not heard that, thanks for the info. They seemed pretty certain but left room for doubt in their conclusions - would it kill you to be a little less sneering about your own? I would suggest neither you nor I can know for certain to what extent humans are affecting climate change, a bit of humility about a 4.5 billion year old system befits complicated apes with a 70 year life span.
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:49 pmOn Climate change, I found this article on Slate
http://www.slate.com/id/2176156/
which framed some interesting questions.
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:53 pmThis is the danger of non-Scientists debating techinical issues that must remain obscure - it becomes a battle of websites, where all you have to do is say “your website sucks, mine rules.†For example, I THINK Venus is too hot for ice caps and Jupiter and Saturn are Gas giants much, much farther away from the Sun and so might not expect the same effect in fluctuations of solar activity.
Comment by Keltoi at Night — October 22, 2007 @ 7:49 pm
You’re right, the territory is hazardous for us non-scientists. But I never said anything about ice caps on Venus. i can see where you would infer that from what I wrote, but all I said was “similar effects” meaning similar warming effects. It would stand to reason that, if solar activity was the source of global warming on Earth and on Mars, one might reasonably expect to observe similar warming trends on the other planets within the sun’s influence. That might be a step toward validating the idea you suggested. In the absence of some kind of validation, however, all you are doing is presenting two phenomena and implying a direct causal link between them where none is established.
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:56 pmThis is the danger of non-Scientists debating techinical issues that must remain obscure - it becomes a battle of websites, where all you have to do is say “your website sucks, mine rules.†Comment by Keltoi at Night — October 22, 2007 @ 7:49 pm
Speak for yourself! Many that post on this website are in fact quite versed in the science of these matters - we just don’t waste our time trying to explain this to idiots like yourself!
For example, I THINK Venus is too hot for ice caps and Jupiter and Saturn are Gas giants much, much farther away from the Sun and so might not expect the same effect in fluctuations of solar activity. Comment by Keltoi at Night — October 22, 2007 @ 7:49 pm
You do realize that temperatures on those planets can be measured still -right dumbass?
And RHF, I went to your site, read the explanation, I had not heard that, thanks for the info. Comment by Keltoi at Night — October 22, 2007 @ 7:49 pm
Then you’re an idiot, because anyone discussing this topic with any degree of knowledge on the subject knows this! Stop confusing YOUR ignorance, with your opinion being equivalent to those of us that KNOW SOMETHING! Ignorance is always the defense of you lazy, stupid ‘tards - either educate yourself, or STFU until you do!
They seemed pretty certain but left room for doubt in their conclusions - would it kill you to be a little less sneering about your own? Comment by Keltoi at Night — October 22, 2007 @ 7:49 pm
Says the sneering jack*ss (you) that posted a completely stupid claim! They left NO room for doubt, that’s your OWN FANTASY!
I would suggest neither you nor I can know for certain to what extent humans are affecting climate change, a bit of humility about a 4.5 billion year old system befits complicated apes with a 70 year life span. Comment by Keltoi at Night — October 22, 2007 @ 7:49 pm
Oh please, just because you’re TOO STUPID and IGNORANT to know, don’t project that ignorance on me - moron!
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:57 pmOn Climate change, I found this article on Slate
http://www.slate.com/id/2176156/
which framed some interesting questions.
Comment by Keltoi at Night — October 22, 2007 @ 7:53 pm
Framed is the correct term - it’s a stupid hit piece, written by a moron!
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:58 pm“a bit of humility about a 4.5 billion year old system befits complicated apes with a 70 year life span.”
Comment by Keltoi at Night
Now there’s some loopy reasoning.
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:59 pmHe’s like our little catnip mouse.
Comment by ralph the wonder llama — October 22, 2007 @ 7:46 pm
Heh. Or verbal punching bag. Heh.
he probably thinks he’s being funny.
Comment by republicans hate facts — October 22, 2007 @ 7:48 pm
I am afraid you might be right… or worse, he might think he is making sense and winning the “debate”.
October 22nd, 2007 at 8:00 pmKeltoi: “This is the danger of non-Scientists debating techinical issues..”
If this is a concern for you, I would think you would pay more attention to the overwhelming consensus among legitimate scientists and less attention to professional debunkers who get their funding from fossile fuel corporations.
October 22nd, 2007 at 8:02 pmComment by Keltoi at Night — October 22, 2007 @ 7:49 pm
And you rely on 3 years worth of incomplete observations to assert that there is, indeed, global warming on Mars, while disputing the much more comprehensive evidence -product of many years of research by many scientists around the world- of global climate change on Earth.
You skepticism smacks of fact cherry-picking… the sort bible literalists engage in to cling on to their beliefs.
October 22nd, 2007 at 8:04 pm“a bit of humility about a 4.5 billion year old system befits complicated apes with a 70 year life span.â€
Comment by Keltoi at Night
Now there’s some loopy reasoning.
Comment by barfly — October 22, 2007 @ 7:59 pm
Well at least he admitted we’re apes - that’s unusual for an anti-science religious wingnut! You have to admit!
Of course calling us ‘complicated apes’ (a term meant to imply we have very little capacity to do big things - how demeaning from a not so complicated monkey) doesn’t account for our ability to shove almost 30 billion metric tons of CO2 into the air annually, not to mention the other greenhouse gases! Yeah, 30 billion tons, what an ‘insignificant’ act by a complicated monkey!
Wow, these wingnuts are utterly and completely insanely stupid!
October 22nd, 2007 at 8:05 pmI am afraid you might be right… or worse, he might think he is making sense and winning the “debateâ€.
Comment by Gregor Samsa — October 22, 2007 @ 8:00 pm
Yeah, they have medications to resolve those kinds of problems, but of course he probably thinks EVERYONE ELSE are the insane ones ;)
October 22nd, 2007 at 8:05 pmIf this is a concern for you, I would think you would pay more attention to the overwhelming consensus among legitimate scientists and less attention to professional debunkers who get their funding from fossile fuel corporations.
Comment by Ret. Col. Jack Ripper — October 22, 2007 @ 8:02 pm
Ah, you’re expecting a wingnut to be rational and logical! Unfortunately, if they had that capacity, they wouldn’t post the stupid things they do daily!
October 22nd, 2007 at 8:06 pmI’m not going to jump in the middle of another GW fight but, here’s a quick factoid. The CO2 content of the atmosphere is, as nearly as science can estimate, the highest it’s been in, at least, 800,000 years. Give or take. This level has increased, exponentially, since reliable records have been kept. This fact is beyond dispute. And I’ll leave it to you all to choose how to use it in your arguments.
I will offer one quick opinion though. Messing with the composition of the Earth’s atmosphere has unknowable consequences. I hope we, as a race, don’t eff it up!
October 22nd, 2007 at 8:08 pmKeltoi at Night,
It is true that you and I and ralph and republicanshatefacts have not spent our lives studying earth’s temperatures. But of the scientists who HAVE, all but a very tiny percentage agree with Al Gore or what I am saying.
This tiny percentage who does not agree that we are now experiencing severe man-made climate change are mostly paid large amounts of money to say the things they are saying. Look at where Heritage/Hudson gets its money.
Of course ice ages have come and gone on the Earth before there ever were human beings. But it is also true that there are records in Antarctica’s ice that go back 600,000 years. When they are studied, they say we are really experiencing something unusual today.
October 22nd, 2007 at 8:11 pmThe reason Venus is much hotter than Mercury, even though Mercury is closer to the Sun, is due to Venus’ greenhouse effect.
October 22nd, 2007 at 8:18 pm“Of course calling us ‘complicated apes’ (a term meant to imply we have very little capacity to do big things - how demeaning from a not so complicated monkey) doesn’t account for our ability to shove almost 30 billion metric tons of CO2 into the air annually, not to mention the other greenhouse gases! ”
And when the methane clathrates begin to melt, they’ll look back at the present, nostalgic for “the good old days” when they could just willfully ignore the truth.
October 22nd, 2007 at 8:19 pmKeith, yes, but the site I linked Keltoi the brainless to IS RUN BY THE SCIENTISTS THAT DO THIS FOR A LIVING! That’s right, the REAL climate scientists run that site! People that are both trained and published in the field! Unlike the Oil funded wingnut sites he believes is ‘equivalent’ to scientists!
Yeah, and Keltoi at night, the vatican thought its opinion on the solar system and a flat earth were equivalent to Galileo as well - they were wrong, just like you and your unscientific websites you link to! Unless you’re going to state that we shouldn’t talk about the earth being round unless we are geologists, your claims about climate science is equally stupid! What I can say is I wouldn’t trust a fundamentalist christian about the flatness, age or evolution of the earth - no more than I trust them with global warming (what you’re doing!). Leave the science to the scientists, and grow up - ok?
October 22nd, 2007 at 8:19 pmComment by republicans hate facts — October 22, 2007 @ 8:19 pm
I agree. It was only a few years ago that the Vatican said Galileo was right and apologized for his excommunication. There is a museum in Kentucky that says humans lived with dinosaurs. One of the top legislators in Texas hands out a pamphlet saying the entire universe revolves around a fixed Earth.
October 22nd, 2007 at 8:28 pmOh please, just because you’re TOO STUPID and IGNORANT to know, don’t project that ignorance on me - moron!
Comment by republicans hate facts — October 22, 2007 @ 7:57 pm
You’re an angry little guy, aren’t you? Was that you in Bill Maher’s audience the other night?
October 22nd, 2007 at 8:33 pmThe people in the area hit by fires pay high taxes to the Federal Treasury. Now the Bush Family and the GOP felt that the victims of Katrina didn’t count because they were poor but now the GOP is telling those with multi-million dollar homes and income that don’t count either. One home was valued at 17 million dollars I guess the White House thinks that a cheap home. Millions are losing their homes because of sub-prime, millions are losing their jobs now all the taxpayers money is going to Iraq/Afghanistan/Halliburton profits. Americans need international help as the fires, health care and Americans suffering from stolen economy. Can the Saudi King give a little help as he is best friends with Bush.
October 22nd, 2007 at 9:00 pmYou’re an angry little guy, aren’t you? Was that you in Bill Maher’s audience the other night?
Comment by Keltoi at Night — October 22, 2007 @ 8:33 pm
More projection. You really identified with Maher - eh? Yeah, he was so NOT ANGRY that he didn’t go hunt and walk them out of the audience because he was such a crappy host he couldn’t control the crowd! Easy to see why you’d try to post such a ‘hateful’ remark after the thrashing I gave you for your stupid comments! Don’t worry, it’ll only hurt every time I remind you of how ignorant you are!
October 22nd, 2007 at 9:40 pmI agree. It was only a few years ago that the Vatican said Galileo was right and apologized for his excommunication. There is a museum in Kentucky that says humans lived with dinosaurs. One of the top legislators in Texas hands out a pamphlet saying the entire universe revolves around a fixed Earth.
Comment by Keith — October 22, 2007 @ 8:28 pm
Those are your constituents! And that’s YOUR attitude! Learn something on the topic, or STFU, ok junior?
October 22nd, 2007 at 9:41 pmI don’t think most American Christians hold no truck with no Papists! That there Gally Leo is Burnin’ in Hell right now. /sarc off
October 22nd, 2007 at 10:06 pmIt truly amazes me that conservatives are never embarassed. Beck is a moron. I think my dog is smarter.
October 22nd, 2007 at 10:08 pmWould the media please stop repeating what these inane controversialists say. It wont make me watch Gwynn Blechhs show or listen to the audio.
October 23rd, 2007 at 12:10 amThose are your constituents! And that’s YOUR attitude! Learn something on the topic, or STFU, ok junior?
Comment